Against “Revolution” and “Evolution”

Those standard historiographic themes of evolution and revolution need replacing. They perpetuate mid-Victorian scientists history of science. Historians history of science does well to take in the long run from the Greek and Hebrew heritages on, and to work at avoiding misleading anachronism and teleology. As an alternative to the usual evo-revo themes, a historiography of origins and species, of cosmologies (including microcosmogonies and macrocosmogonies) and ontologies, is developed here. The advantages of such a historiography are illustrated by looking briefly at a number of transitions the transition from Greek and Hebrew doctrines to their integrations by medieval authors; the transition from the Platonist, Aristotelian, Christian Aquinas to the Newtonian Buffon and to the no less Newtonian Lamarck; the departures the early Darwin made away from Lamarcks and from Lyells views. Issues concerning historical thinking about nature, concerning essentialism and concerning classification are addressed in an attempt to challenge customary stereotypes. Questions about originality and influence are raised, especially concerning Darwins tree of life scheme. The broader historiography of Darwinian science as a social ideology, and as a worldview, is examined and the scope for revisions emphasised. Throughout, graduate students are encouraged to see this topic area not as worked out, but as full of opportunities for fresh contributions.     

Steroid hormones and the brain: Linking “nature” and “nurture”

Contrary to earlier belief, the genetic constitution of each cell of the body (nature) is subject to modulation by environmental factors (nurture) which act throughout the life of the organism to shape the individual characteristics. The nervous system adapts and changes with the environment that the organism experiences through genomic activity controlled by chemical messengers from other nerve cells and from endocrine secretions. The nervous system expresses receptors for a number of circulating hormones, and the location of these hormone receptors has revealed a great deal about the neuroanatomy of neuroendocrine and behavioral control processes. The brain controls the endocrine system through the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, and it responds to circulating hormones throughout each stage of life. These effects begin during early development (eg., sexual differentiation of the brain; effects of maternal or neonatal stress). They continue in adult life in response to cyclic events (eg., season of year; time of day, controlling reproduction and daily activity-sleep rhythms of behavior); and they also include the behavior of other animals which alters hormone output. Hormones also operate during the aging process and under conditions which induce neural damage such as hypoxia and stress. This overview summarizes involvement of steroid hormones of gonads and adrenals in many of these processes and also examines the features of the genomic activity which is modified by these hormones. This area of research is fruitful because it brings together molecular, anatomical, physiological and behavioral approaches in an attempt to understand the longterm plasticity of the nervous system.This overview article, written in recognition of the contributions to neuroscience by Professor Holger Hydén, is based upon a Presidential Special Lecture delivered by the author at the Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Washington, D.C., on November 11, 1986     

“Realism” and “relevance” in gaming simulations

How useful are gaming simulations for the study of problems that interest human ecologists? Anatol Rapoport, a principal contributor to the development of game theory, raised this issue with the editors of Human Ecology,who in turn invited him to express his views in print. In brief, Dr. Rapoport calls into question the real-world applicability of gaming simulations, and explores its limitations. The educational function of simulation, he argues, should not be confused with the research aims of laboratory experimentation. The addition of “realistic” conditions in a gaming simulation merely complicates the experiment and reduces its theoretical significance. It does, however, have some pedagogical utility, whose implications have not yet been adequately taken into account. Dr. Rapoport considers this matter with reference to the problem of “social traps,” such as the “tragedy of the commons,” an issue which concerns many human-ecology researchers.