Turnover of R1 (Type I) and R2 (Type Ii) Retrotransposable Elements in the Ribosomal DNA of Drosophila Melanogaster

R1 and R2 are distantly related non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements each of which inserts into a specific site in the 28S rRNA genes of most insects. We have analyzed aspects of R1 and R2 abundance and sequence variation in 27 geographical isolates of Drosophila melanogaster. The fraction of 28S rRNA genes containing these elements varied greatly between strains, 17-67% for R1 elements and 2-28% for R2 elements. The total percentage of the rDNA repeats inserted ranged from 32 to 77%. The fraction of the rDNA repeats that contained both of these elements suggested that R1 and R2 exhibit neither an inhibition of nor preference for insertion into a 28S gene already containing the other type of element. Based on the conservation of restriction sites in the elements of all strains, and sequence analysis of individual elements from three strains, nucleotide divergence is very low for R1 and R2 elements within or between strains (less than 0.6%). This sequence uniformity is the expected result of the forces of concerted evolution (unequal crossovers and gene conversion) which act on the rRNA genes themselves. Evidence for the role of retrotransposition in the turnover of R1 and R2 was obtained by using naturally occurring 5' length polymorphisms of the elements as markers for independent transposition events. The pattern of these different length 5' truncations of R1 and R2 was found to be diverse and unique to most strains analyzed. Because recombination can only, with time, amplify or eliminate those length variants already present, the diversity found in each strain suggests that retrotransposition has played a critical role in maintaining these elements in the rDNA repeats of D. melanogaster.     

Invasion of the human albumin-alpha-fetoprotein gene family by Alu, Kpn, and two novel repetitive DNA elements

The human albumin-alpha-fetoprotein genomic domain contains 13 repetitive DNA elements randomly distributed throughout the symmetrical structures of these genes. These repeated sequences are located at different sites within the two genes. The human albumin gene contains five Alu elements within four of its 14 intervening sequences. Two of these repeats are located in intron 2, and the remaining three are located in introns 7, 8, and 11. The human alpha-fetoprotein gene contains three of these Alu elements, one in intron 4 and the remaining two in the 3'-untranslated region. In addition, the human alpha-fetoprotein gene contains a Kpn repeat and two classes of novel repeats that are absent from the human albumin gene. Six of the Alu elements within the two genes are bound by short direct repeats that harbor five base substitutions in 120 possible positions (60 bp times 2 termini). The absence of Alu repeats from analogous positions in rodents indicates that these repeats invaded the albumin-alpha-fetoprotein domain less than 85 Myr ago (the time of mammalian radiation). Furthermore, considering the conservation of terminal repeats flanking the Alu sequences of the albumin-alpha-fetoprotein domain (0.042 changes per site), we submit that the average time of Alu insertion into this gene family could have been as recently as 15-30 Myr ago.     

Genomic and structural organization of Drosophila melanogaster G elements.

The properties and the genomic organization of G elements, a moderately repeated DNA family of D. melanogaster, are reported. G elements lack terminal repeats, generate target site duplications at the point of insertion and exhibit at one end a stretch of A residues of variable length. In a large number of recombinant clones analyzed G elements occur in tandem arrays, interspersed with specific ribosomal DNA (rDNA) segments. This arrangement results from the insertion of members of the G family within the nontranscribed spacer (NTS) of rDNA units. Similarity of the site of integration of G elements to that of ribosomal DNA insertions suggests that distinct DNA sequences might have been inserted into rDNA through a partly common pathway.     

Evolution of alu family repeats since the divergence of human and chimpanzee

Summary The DNA sequences of three members of the Alu family of repeated sequences located 5 to the chimpanzee 2 gene have been determined. The base sequences of the three corresponding human Alu family repeats have been previously determined, permitting the comparison of identical Alu family members in human and chimpanzee. Here we compare the sequences of seven pairs of chimpanzee and human Alu repeats. In each case, with the exception of minor sequence differences, the identical Alu repeat is located at identical sites in the human and chimpanzee genomes. The Alu repeats diverge at the rate expected for nonselected sequences. Sequence conversion has not replaced any of these 14 Alu family members since the divergence between chimpanzee and human.     

Human ribosomal RNA gene spacer sequences are found interspersed elsewhere in the genome

A cloned EcoRI fragment containing human 18 S rRNA gene sequences was used to screen a gene library to obtain a set of 8 overlapping cloned DNA segments extending into the non-transcribed spacer region of the human ribosomal RNA gene cluster. 19.4 kb of the approx. 43-kb rDNA repeat was obtained in cloned form and mapped with restriction endonucleases. None of the clones obtained extended into 28 S rRNA sequences. A 7-kb region of non-transcribed spacer DNA shared in common between five independent clones was subjected to comparative restriction digests. It was estimated that sequences among the five different spacer isolated varied by not more than 1.0%, if all the observed differences are assumed due to point mutation. HaeII-restriction fragments from within this same 7-kb region contain sequences carried not only within the tandem repeats of the gene cluster but interspersed elsewhere in the genome. Some of these sequences correspond to the Alu family of highly repeated interspersed sequences.     

The Evolution of MHC Diversity by Segmental Duplication and Transposition of Retroelements

Sequence analysis of a 237 kb genomic fragment from the central region of the MHC has revealed that the HLA-B and HLA-C genes are contained within duplicated segments peri-B (53 kb) and peri-C (48 kb), respectively, and separated by an intervening sequence (IF) of 30 kb. The peri-B and peri-C segments share at least 90% sequence homology except when interrupted by insertions/deletions including Alu, L1, an endogenous retrovirus, and pseudogenes. The sequences of peri-B, IF, and peri-C were searched for the presence of Alu elements to use as markers of evolution, chromosomal rearrangements, and polymorphism. Of 29 Alu elements, 14 were identified in peri-B, 11 in peri-C, and 4 in IF. The Alu elements in peri-B and peri-C clustered phylogenetically into two clades which were classified as ``preduplication' and ``postduplication' clades. Four Alu J elements that are shared by peri-B and peri-C and are flanked by homologous sequences in their paralogous locations, respectively, clustered into a ``preduplication' clade. By contrast, the majority of Alu elements, which are unique to either peri-B or peri-C, clustered into a postduplication clade together with the Alu consensus subfamily members ranging from platyrrhine-specific (Spqxcg) to catarrhine-specific Alu sequences (Y). The insertion of platyrrhine-specific Alu elements in postduplication locations of peri-B and peri-C implies that these two segments are the products of a duplication which occurred in primates prior to the divergence of the New World primate from the human lineage (35–44 mya). Examination of the paralogous Alu integration sites revealed that 9 of 14 postduplication Alu sequences have produced microsatellites of different length and sequence within the Alu 3′-poly A tail. The present analysis supports the hypothesis that HLA-B and HLA-C genes are products of an extended segmental duplication between 44 and 81 million years ago (mya), and that subsequent diversification of both genomic segments occurred because of the mobility and mutation of retroelements such as Alu repeats. Received: 21 May 1997 / Accepted: 9 July 1997     

Coding region deletions associated with the major form of rDNA interruption in Drosophila

The nucleotide sequences at and around the termini of 5 kb type 1 interruptions in three separate clones of D. melanogaster rDNA repeats have been determined, and have been compared with the sequence of the corresponding region of an insertion-free rDNA repeat. All three interrupted rDNA repeats contain a small deletion of 28S rRNA coding material at the left coding/insertion sequence junction. A second deletion was found in one of the three clones, ad other aberrations were suggested by the results of restriction enzyme digestions of unfractionated rDNA. The termini of 5 kb type 1 rDNA insertions in D. melanogaster were also compared with the corresponding regions of 28S rDNA interruptions in D. virilis: the insertion site is identical in the two species, but the termini of the two species' interruptions show no homology. I sequenced a 1.1 kb region of the 5 kb type 1 D. melanogaster rDNA interruption that covers the sequences of the 1 kb and 0.5 kb insertions. There is 98% homology between the rightmost 1 kb of the 5 kb interruption and the sequences of the shorter insertions. Data suggest that Drosophila rDNA interruptions arose as a transposable element, and that divergence had included length alterations generated by unequal crossing over.     

Evolution of Alu repeats. Imitation model

At present, nucleotide sequences of 100 different Alu repeats are known, i.e. 0.01% of the total number of Alu repeats in the genome. It is clear that one can not refer the evolutionary characteristics of Alu repeats obtained from the analysis of the available limited sample to all Alu repeats comprised in the genome, without additional statistical estimations. For supplementary investigation of such average evolutionary characteristics as the extent of intraspecific divergence, the rate of Alu repeats transposition (insertion, excision), we used the method of imitation simulation of the process of Alu repeats transposition in the genome. As a result of simulation, phylogenetic relations were obtained among all Alu repeats. It was shown that the evolutionary characteristics evaluated for different samples of repeats were similar. It was proved that the extent of divergence of Alu repeats in the model is twice as small as that evaluated, according to the real data (0.15, instead of 0.3). Possible reasons for such discrepancy have been discussed.     

Structure and variability of recently inserted Alu family members.

The HS subfamily of Alu sequences is comprised of a group of nearly identical members. Individual subfamily members share 97.7% nucleotide identity with each other and 98.9% nucleotide identity with the HS consensus sequence. Individual subfamily members are on the average 2.8 million years old, and were probably derived from a single source 'master' gene sometime after the human/great ape divergence. The recent Alu family member insertions provide a better image of the structure of Alu retroposons before they have had the opportunity to change significantly. All of the HS subfamily members are flanked by perfect direct repeats as a result of insertion at staggered nicks. The 'master' gene from which the HS subfamily members were derived had an oligo-dA rich tail at least 40 bases long. The 'master' gene is very rich in CpG dinucleotides, but nucleotide substitutions within subfamily members accumulated in a random manner typical for Alu sequence with CpG substitutions occurring 9.2 fold faster than non-CpG substitutions.     

The Contribution of Alu Elements to Mutagenic DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Alu elements make up the largest family of human mobile elements, numbering 1.1 million copies and comprising 11% of the human genome. As a consequence of evolution and genetic drift, Alu elements of various sequence divergence exist throughout the human genome. Alu/Alu recombination has been shown to cause approximately 0.5% of new human genetic diseases and contribute to extensive genomic structural variation. To begin understanding the molecular mechanisms leading to these rearrangements in mammalian cells, we constructed Alu/Alu recombination reporter cell lines containing Alu elements ranging in sequence divergence from 0%-30% that allow detection of both Alu/Alu recombination and large non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) deletions that range from 1.0 to 1.9 kb in size. Introduction of as little as 0.7% sequence divergence between Alu elements resulted in a significant reduction in recombination, which indicates even small degrees of sequence divergence reduce the efficiency of homology-directed DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Further reduction in recombination was observed in a sequence divergence-dependent manner for diverged Alu/Alu recombination constructs with up to 10% sequence divergence. With greater levels of sequence divergence (15%-30%), we observed a significant increase in DSB repair due to a shift from Alu/Alu recombination to variable-length NHEJ which removes sequence between the two Alu elements. This increase in NHEJ deletions depends on the presence of Alu sequence homeology (similar but not identical sequences). Analysis of recombination products revealed that Alu/Alu recombination junctions occur more frequently in the first 100 bp of the Alu element within our reporter assay, just as they do in genomic Alu/Alu recombination events. This is the first extensive study characterizing the influence of Alu element sequence divergence on DNA repair, which will inform predictions regarding the effect of Alu element sequence divergence on both the rate and nature of DNA repair events.     

Recently integrated human Alu repeats: finding needles in the haystack

Alu elements undergo amplification through retroposition and integration into new locations throughout primate genomes. Over 500,000 Alu elements reside in the human genome, making the identification of newly inserted Alu repeats the genomic equivalent of finding needles in the haystack. Here, we present two complementary methods for rapid detection of newly integrated Alu elements. In the first approach we employ computational biology to mine the human genomic DNA sequence databases in order to identify recently integrated Alu elements. The second method is based on an anchor-PCR technique which we term Allele-Specific Alu PCR (ASAP). In this approach, Alu elements are selectively amplified from anchored DNA generating a display or 'fingerprint' of recently integrated Alu elements. Alu insertion polymorphisms are then detected by comparison of the DNA fingerprints generated from different samples. Here, we explore the utility of these methods by applying them to the identification of members of the smallest previously identified subfamily of Alu repeats in the human genome termed Ya8. This subfamily of Alu repeats is composed of about 50 elements within the human genome. Approximately 50% of the Ya8 Alu family members have inserted in the human genome so recently that they are polymorphic, making them useful markers for the study of human evolution. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Molecular evolution of intergenic DNA in higher primates: pattern of DNA changes, molecular clock, and evolution of repetitive sequences

A 3.1-kb intergenic DNA fragment located between the psi beta-globin and delta-globin genes in the beta-globin gene cluster was cloned from gorilla, orangutan, rhesus monkey, and spider monkey, and the nucleotide sequence of each fragment was determined. The phylogeny of these four sequences, together with two previously published allelic sequences from humans and one from chimpanzee, was constructed, and the accumulation of mutations in the region was analyzed. The sites of base substitutions are not evenly distributed within the region: two Alu repeats have accumulated 0.21 + 0.02 substitutions/site with 0.15 + 0.008 substitutions/site in the remainder of the fragment. The occurrence of substitutions at neighboring sites is more frequent than would be expected if they were independent. The observed excesses disappear when ancestral -CG- dinucleotide sites are excluded. The phylogenetic relationships of the sequences indicate that the human sequence shares a most recent coancestor with the chimpanzee sequence. The data also show that great apes have accumulated fewer mutations in this part of the genome than has the rhesus monkey. The relative rates of accumulation of 12 kinds of nucleotide substitution in the region during primate evolution are asymmetric in the DNA strands. From these rates of accumulation, the origin of a simple stretch of sequence near the 3' end of the 3.1-kb fragment was deduced to be a sequence comprising 50% T and 50% C on one strand. The two oppositely oriented Alu sequences in the 3.1-kb region were inserted at their present positions before the divergence of the New-World monkeys from other lineages. Our analysis shows that the nucleotide sequences of the two Alu repeats in spider monkey are unexpectedly similar both to each other and to the deduced ancestral sequence of Alu repeats. The data suggest that there has been some type of recombinational event between the spider monkey Alu repeats but that it was not a simple gene conversion.      

Junctions between genes in the haptoglobin gene cluster of primates.

To investigate the nature of the recombination that generated the haptoglobin three-gene cluster in Old World primates, we sequenced the region between the second gene (HPR) and the third gene (HPP) in chimpanzees (15 kb), as well as the region 3' to the cluster in humans (14 kb). Comparison to the previously sequenced human haptoglobin (HP) and HPR genes showed that the junction point between HP and HPR in humans (junction 1) was not identical to the junction point between the HPR and HPP genes of the chimpanzee (junction 2). An Alu sequence was found at each junction, but both Alu sequences lacked short direct repeats of the flanking genomic DNA. The lack of direct repeats implies that both junction Alu sequences are the products of recombination between different Alu elements. In addition, other insertion and deletion events are clustered in the regions near the junction Alu sequences. The observation that Alu sequences define the junctions between genes in the haptoglobin gene cluster emphasizes the importance of Alu sequences in the evolution of multigene families.     

Large-scale analysis of the Alu Ya5 and Yb8 subfamilies and their contribution to human genomic diversity

We have utilized computational biology to screen GenBank for the presence of recently integrated Ya5 and Yb8 Alu family members. Our analysis identified 2640 Ya5 Alu family members and 1852 Yb8 Alu family members from the draft sequence of the human genome. We selected a set of 475 of these elements for detailed analyses. Analysis of the DNA sequences from the individual Alu elements revealed a low level of random mutations within both subfamilies consistent with the recent origin of these elements within the human genome. Polymerase chain reaction assays were used to determine the phylogenetic distribution and human genomic variation associated with each Alu repeat. Over 99 % of the Ya5 and Yb8 Alu family members were restricted to the human genome and absent from orthologous positions within the genomes of several non-human primates, confirming the recent origin of these Alu subfamilies in the human genome. Approximately 1 % of the analyzed Ya5 and Yb8 Alu family members had integrated into previously undefined repeated regions of the human genome. Analysis of mosaic Yb8 elements suggests gene conversion played an important role in generating sequence diversity among these elements. Of the 475 evaluated elements, a total of 106 of the Ya5 and Yb8 Alu family members were polymorphic for insertion presence/absence within the genomes of a diverse array of human populations. The newly identified Alu insertion polymorphisms will be useful tools for the study of human genomic diversity.     

Non-traditional Alu evolution and primate genomic diversity

Alu elements belonging to the previously identified "young" subfamilies are thought to have inserted in the human genome after the divergence of humans from non-human primates and therefore should not be present in non-human primate genomes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based screening of over 500 Alu insertion loci resulted in the recovery of a few "young" Alu elements that also resided at orthologous positions in non-human primate genomes. Sequence analysis demonstrated these "young" Alu insertions represented gene conversion events of pre-existing ancient Alu elements or independent parallel insertions of older Alu elements in the same genomic region. The level of gene conversion between Alu elements suggests that it may have a significant influence on the single nucleotide diversity within the genome. All the instances of multiple independent Alu insertions within the same small genomic regions were recovered from the owl monkey genome, indicating a higher Alu amplification rate in owl monkeys relative to many other primates. This study suggests that the majority of Alu insertions in primate genomes are the products of unique evolutionary events.     

Distribution of Alu repeats along the human genome: formation of clusters and features of insertion regions

The contextual analysis of nucleotide sequences of 22 Alu repeats arrangement regions in the human genome has been carried out and some of their peculiarities have been revealed. In particular, the occurrence of marked and statistical non-random homology between the repeats and the regions of their integration has been shown. A mechanism of choosing the Alu repeats insertion regions in the genome has been suggested taking into account these peculiarities. Using a sample of the 80 human Alu repeats sequences peculiarities of these repeats location within the genome has been investigated. A tendency to the formation of Alu repeats clusters in various regions of the genome was revealed. A range of possible mechanisms on such Alu clusters emergence is considered. On the basis of the data obtained an "attraction" mechanism, according to which integration of Alu repeats into the definite region of the genome increases the insertion probability of other Alu repeats into the same region, are proposed.     

Comprehensive analysis of two Alu Yd subfamilies

Alu elements have inserted in the human genome throughout primate evolution. A small number of Alu insertions have occurred after the divergence of humans from nonhuman primates and therefore should not be present in nonhuman primate genomes. Most of these recently integrated Alu elements are contained with a series of discrete Alu subfamilies that are related to each other based upon diagnostic nucleotide substitutions. We have extracted members of the Alu Yd subfamily that are derivatives of the Alu Y subfamily that share a common 12-bp deletion that defines the Yd lineage from the draft sequence of the human genome. Analysis of the Yd Alu elements resulted in the recovery of two new Alu subfamilies, Yd3 and Yd6, which contain a total of 295 members (198 Yd3 and 97 Yd6). DNA sequence analysis of each of the Alu Yd subfamilies yielded age estimates of 8.02 and 1.20 million years old for the Alu Yd3 and Yd6 subfamilies, respectively. Two hundred Alu Yd3 and Yd6 loci were screened using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine their phylogenetic origin and associated levels of human genomic diversity. The Alu Yd3 subfamily appears to have started amplifying relatively early in primate evolution and continued propagating albeit at a low level as many of its members are found in a variety of hominoid (humans, greater and lesser ape) genomes. Only two of the elements are polymorphic in the human genome and absent from the genomes of nonhuman primates. By contrast all of the members of the Alu Yd6 subfamily are restricted to the human genome, with 12% of the elements representing insertion polymorphisms in human populations. A single Alu Yd6 locus contained an independent parallel forward insertion of a paralogous Alu Sq sequence in the owl monkey. These Alu subfamilies are a source of genomic fossil relics for the study of primate phylogenetics and human population genetics.     

The 10 kb Drosophila virilis 28S rDNA intervening sequence is flanked by a direct repeat of 14 base pairs of coding sequence

Most repeat units of rDNA in Drosophila virilis are interrupted in the 28S rRNA coding region by an intervening sequence about 10 kb in length; uninterrupted repeats have a length of about 11 kb. We have sequenced the coding/intervening sequence junctions and flanking regions in two independent clones of interrupted rDNA, and the corresponding 28S rRNA coding region in a clone of uninterrupted rDNA. The intervening sequence is terminated at both ends by a direct repeat of a fourteen nucleotide sequence that is present once in the corresponding region of an intact gene. This is a phenomenon associated with transposable elements in other eukaryotes and in prokaryotes, and the Drosophila rDNA intervening sequence is discussed in this context. We have compared more than 200 nucleotides of the D. virilis 28S rRNA gene with sequences of homologous regions of rDNA in Tetrahymena pigmentosa (Wild and Sommer, 1980) and Xenopus laevis (Gourse and Gerbi, 1980): There is 93% sequence homology among the diverse species, so that the rDNA region in question (about two-thirds of the way into the 28S rRNA coding sequence) has been very highly conserved in eukaryote evolution. The intervening sequence in T. pigmentosa is at a site 79 nucleotides upstream from the insertion site of the Drosophila intervening sequence.     

Divergence of primate ribosomal RNA genes as assayed by restriction enzyme analysis

Primate ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have been compared by restriction endonuclease mapping. In all species examined, the restriction map of the reiterated ribosomal DNA is simple (within the limits of detection by hybridization with rRNA) and is consistent with a high degree of homogeneity among the repeats. Within a species, all members have similar rDNA restriction patterns. However, different species of primates have distinctly different rDNA restriction maps; even chimpanzee and man can be discerned by their rDNA restriction patterns. Possible mechanisms for maintenance of homogeneity of the rDNA repeats within a species, while allowing divergence among closely related species, are discussed.