Replication control in plasmid R1: duplex formation between the antisense RNA, CopA, and its target, CopT, is not required for inhibition of RepA synthesis.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is regulated by an antisense RNA, CopA, which inhibits the synthesis of the rate-limiting initiator protein RepA. The inhibition requires an interaction between the antisense RNA and its target, CopT, in the leader of the RepA mRNA. This binding reaction has previously been studied in vitro, and the formation of a complete RNA duplex between the two RNAs has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Here we investigate whether complete duplex formation is required for CopA-mediated inhibition in vivo. A mutated copA gene was constructed, encoding a truncated CopA which is impaired in its ability to form a complete CopA/CopT duplex, but which forms a primary binding intermediate (the 'kissing complex'). The mutated CopA species (S-CopA) mediated incompatibility against wild-type R1 plasmids and inhibited RepA-LacZ fusion protein synthesis. Northern blot, primer extension and S1 analyses indicated that S-CopA did not form a complete duplex with CopT in vivo since bands corresponding to RNase III cleavage products were missing. An in vitro analysis supported the same conclusion. These data suggest that formation of the 'kissing complex' suffices to inhibit RepA synthesis, and that complete CopA/CopT duplex formation is not required. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

Translational control by antisense RNA in control of plasmid replication

Control of replication of plasmids involves two processes: measurement of the copy number of the plasmid and adjustment of the replication frequency accordingly. For both these processes IncFII plasmids use an antisense RNA (CopA RNA) that forms a duplex with the upstream region (CopT) of the mRNA of the rate-limiting RepA protein. The kinetics of duplex formation was measured in vitro for the wild type and for a cop mutant plasmid; the mutant showed a reduction in the second-order rate constant for the formation of the RNA duplex and a similar increase in copy number. Hence, the kinetics of duplex formation and the concentration of CopA RNA determines the copy number of the plasmid.     

Control of replication of plasmid R1: formation of an initial transient complex is rate-limiting for antisense RNA--target RNA pairing.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is determined by the availability of the initiator protein RepA. Synthesis of RepA is negatively controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, which forms a duplex with the upstream region of the RepA mRNA, CopT. We have previously shown that the in vitro formation of the CopA-CopT duplex follows second-order kinetics and occurs in at least two steps. The first step is the formation of a transient (kissing) complex, which is subsequently converted to a persistent duplex. Here, we investigate the details of the reaction scheme and determine the rate constants of the pathway from the free RNAs to the complete duplex. Using a shortened CopA RNA (CopI) we have been able to determine the association and dissociation rate constants (k1,k-1) for the kissing complex (which are inferred to be the same for CopI-T and CopA-T), and measured the hybridization rate constant k2 (for CopA-T k2 is at least 1000-fold greater than for CopI-T). The analysis of CopA derivatives of mutant and wild-type origin shows that the rate of formation of the kissing complex is rate-limiting for the overall pairing reaction between CopA and CopT, both in vitro and in vivo. The biological implications of the kinetically irreversible RNA-RNA binding reaction scheme are discussed.     

Regulation of plasmid R1 replication: PcnB and RNase E expedite the decay of the antisense RNA, CopA

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is controlled by an unstable antisense RNA, CopA, which, by binding to its complementary target, blocks translation of the replication rate-limiting protein RepA. Since the degree of inhibition is directly correlated with the intracellular concentration of CopA, factors affecting CopA turnover can also alter plasmid copy number. We show here that PcnB (PAP I — a poly(A)polymerase of Escherichia coli  ) is such a factor. Previous studies have shown that the copy number of ColE1 is decreased in pcnB mutant strains because the stability of the RNase E processed form of RNAI, the antisense RNA regulator of ColE1 replication, is increased. We find that, analogously, the twofold reduction in R1 copy number caused by a pcnB lesion is associated with a corresponding increase in the stability of the RNase E-generated 3' cleavage product of CopA. These results suggest that CopA decay is initiated by RNase E cleavage and that PcnB is involved in the subsequent rapid decay of the 3' CopA stem-loop segment. We also find that, as predicted, under conditions in which CopA synthesis is unaffected, pcnB mutation reduces RepA translation and increases CopA stability to the same extent.     

Control of replication of plasmid R1: the intergenic region between copA and repA modulates the level of expression of repA

The RepA protein of plasmid R1 is rate-limiting for initiation of R1 replication. Its synthesis is mainly regulated by interactions of the antisense RNA, CopA, with the leader region of the RepA mRNA, CopT. This work describes the characterization of several mutants with sequence alterations in the intergenic region between the copA gene and the repA reading frame. The analysis showed that most of the mutations led both to a decrease in stability of maintenance of mini-R1 derivatives and to lowered repA expression assayed in translational repA-lacZ fusion constructs. Destruction of the copA gene and replacement of the upstream region by the tac promoter in the latter constructs indicated that these mutations per se alter the expression of repA. In addition, we show that particular mutations in this region can directly affect CopA-mediated control, either by changing the kinetics of interaction of CopA RNA with the RepA mRNA and/or by modifying the activity of the copA promoter. These data indicate the importance of the region analysed in the process that controls R1 replication.     

Bulged-out nucleotides protect an antisense RNA from RNase III cleavage.

Bulged-out nucleotides or internal loops are present in the stem-loop structures of several antisense RNAs. We have used the antisense/target RNA system (CopA/CopT) that controls the copy number of plasmid R1 to examine the possible biological function of bulged-out nucleotides. Two regions within the major stem-loop of the antisense RNA, CopA, carry bulged-out nucleotides. Base pairing in either one or both of these regions of the stem was restored by site-specific mutagenesis and in one case a new internal loop was introduced. The set of mutant and wild-type CopA variants was characterized structurally in vitro. The results reported here indicate a possible function of the bulges: their presence protects CopA RNA from being a substrate for the double-strand-specific enzyme RNase III. In vitro cleavage rates were drastically increased when either the lower or both bulges were absent. This is paralleled by a similar, but not identical, effect of the bulges on metabolic stability of the CopA RNAs in vivo. The degradation pathways of wild-type and mutant CopA in various strain backgrounds are discussed. In the accompanying paper, we address the significance of bulges in CopA for binding to the target RNA in vitro and for its inhibitory efficiency in vivo.     

Four-way junctions in antisense RNA-mRNA complexes involved in plasmid replication control: a common theme?

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. In plasmid R1, we have recently shown that the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by the formation of two intermolecular helices, resulting in a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. Based on lead-induced cleavage and ribonuclease (RNase) V(1) probing combined with molecular modeling, a strikingly similar topology is supported for the complex formed between the antisense RNA (Inc) and mRNA (RepZ) of plasmid Col1b-P9. In particular, the position of the four-way junction and the location of divalent ion-binding site(s) indicate that the structural features of these two complexes are essentially the same in spite of sequence differences. Comparisons of several target and antisense RNAs in other plasmids further indicate that similar binding pathways are used to form the inhibitory antisense-target RNA complexes. Thus, in all these systems, the structural features of both antisense and target RNAs determine the topologically possible and kinetically favored pathway that is essential for efficient in vivo control.     

Progression of a loop-loop complex to a four-way junction is crucial for the activity of a regulatory antisense RNA

The antisense RNA, CopA, regulates the replication frequency of plasmid R1 through inhibition of RepA translation by rapid and specific binding to its target RNA (CopT). The stable CopA-CopT complex is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side alignment of two long intramolecular helices. The significance of this structure for binding in vitro and control in vivo was tested by mutations in both CopA and CopT. High rates of stable complex formation in vitro and efficient inhibition in vivo required initial loop-loop complexes to be rapidly converted to extended interactions. These interactions involve asymmetric helix progression and melting of the upper stems of both RNAs to promote the formation of two intermolecular helices. Data presented here delineate the boundaries of these helices and emphasize the need for unimpeded helix propagation. This process is directional, i.e. one of the two intermolecular helices (B) must form first to allow formation of the other (B'). A binding pathway, characterized by a hierarchy of intermediates leading to an irreversible and inhibitory RNA-RNA complex, is proposed.     

Bulged residues promote the progression of a loop-loop interaction to a stable and inhibitory antisense-target RNA complex

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA–CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop–loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop–loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop–loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.     

Plasmid replication functions: two distinct segments of plasmid R1, RepA and RepD, express incompatibility and are capable of autonomous replication.

The genetic determinants for replication and incompatibility of plasmid R1 were investigated by gene cloning methods, and three types of R1 miniplasmid derivatives were generated. The first, exemplified by plasmid pKT300, consisted of a single BglII endonuclease-generated deoxyribonucleic acid fragment derived from the R1 region that is located between the determinants for conjugal transfer and antibiotic resistance. Two types of miniplasmids could be formed from PstI endonuclease-generated fragments of pKT300. One of these, which is equivalent to miniplasmids previously generated from plasmids R1-19 and R1-19B2, consisted of two adjacent PstI fragments that encode the RepA replication system of plasmid R1. The other type contained a segment of R1, designated the RepD replication region, that is adjacent to the RepA region and that has not been identified previously as having the capacity for autonomous replication. Plasmid R1, therefore, contained two distinct deoxyribonucleic acid segments capable of autonomous replication. The RepA-RepD miniplasmid pKT300 had a copy number about eightfold higher than that of R1 and hence lacked a determinant for the regulation of plasmid copy number. Like R1, it was maintained stably in dividing bacteria. RepA miniplasmids had copy numbers which were two- to fourfold higher than that of R1 (i.e., which were lower than that of pKT300) and were maintained slightly less stably than those of pKT300 and R1. The RepD miniplasmid was not maintained stably in dividing bacteria. Previous experiments have shown that incompatibility of IncFII group plasmids is specified by a plasmid copy control gene. Despite the fact that RepA miniplasmids of R1 were defective in copy control, they nevertheless expressed incompatibility. This suggests that two genes are responsible for plasmid copy control, one that specifies incompatibility and is located on RepA miniplasmids and another that is located outside of, but adjacent to, the RepA replication region. Hybrid plasmids composed of pBR322 and one PstI fragment from the RepA region, P-8, exhibited incompatibility towards R2 and RepA miniplasmids but not the RepD miniplasmid, whereas hybrids composed of pBR322 and the PstI fragment of the RepD region, P-3, exhibited incompatibility towards R1 and the RepD miniplasmid but not RepA miniplasmids. These results indicate that the two replication systems are functionally distinct and that, although the RepA system is the principal replication system of R1, the RepD system also plays a role in the maintenance of this plasmid.     

Isolation and properties of the RepA1 protein of the IncFII replicon, RepFIC

The initiator protein RepA1 of the IncFII replicon RepFIC derived from the enterotoxin plasmid EntP307 has been cloned under the control of the lambda PL promoter. This has enabled us to overproduce this protein and study its properties. Here we show that RepA1 is a soluble basic protein with an experimentally determined molecular weight of 40,000. Deletion analysis indicates that the overproduced protein originates from the open reading frame which we previously designated as coding for RepA1. We have also shown that the replication function of the replicon RepFIC depends on the intact RepA1 coding frame.     

Real time kinetic studies of the interaction between folded antisense and target RNAs using surface plasmon resonance

Antisense RNAs interact with their complementary target RNAs as folded structures. The formation of early binding intermediates is the most important step in determining the overall rates of stable complex formation in vitro and the efficiency of control in vivo. In the case of CopA and CopT (antisense/target RNA pair of plasmid R1), recent studies have identified a four-way junction structure as the major binding intermediate. Previously, the kinetics of antisense/target RNA interaction was studied by indirect methods. Here we have used surface plasmon resonance to follow the binding of CopI (a truncated variant of CopA) to CopT in real time. A protocol was developed that permitted the determination of association and dissociation rate constants for wild-type and mutant CopI-CopT pairs. The K(D)-values calculated from these rate constants were in good agreement with the results obtained by indirect methods. In comparison to earlier model studies of interactions between simple complementary nucleic acids, we observe a different temperature dependence for dissociation rate constants. This may be indicative of the complexity of the steps required for interacting folded RNAs; intramolecular structure competes with intermolecular helix progression during complex formation. The association rate constants were not significantly dependent on temperature. The analysis presented shows that the stability of a kissing complex is not the primary determinant of the rate of stable CopA/CopT complex formation.