蛋白质二级结构在线服务器预测评估

蛋白质二级结构的预测,对于研究蛋白质的功能和人类生命科学意义非凡。1951年开始提出预测蛋白质二级结构,1983年对于二级结构的预测只有50%的准确率。经过多年的发展,预测方式不断的改进和完善,到如今准确率已经超过80%。但目前预测在线服务器繁多,连续自动模型评估(CAMEO)也只给出服务器三级结构的预测评估,二级结构评估还未实现。针对上述问题,选取了以下6个服务器:PSRSM、MUFOLD、SPIDER、RAPTORX、JPRED和PSIPRED,对其预测的二级结构进行评估。并且为保证测试集不在训练集内,实验数据选取蛋白质结构数据库(Protein Data Bank,PDB)最新发布的蛋白质。在基于蛋白质同源性30%、50%和70%的实验中,PSRSM取得Q3的准确率分别为91.44%、88.12%和90.17%,比其他预测服务器中最高的MUFOLD分别高出3.19%、1.33%和2.19%,证明在同一类同源性数据中PSRSM比其他服务器有更好的预测效果。除此之外实验也得到其预测的Sov准确度也比其他服务器要高。比较各类服务器的方法与结果,得出今后蛋白质二级结构预测应当重点从大数据、模板和深度学习的角度进行研究。     

神经网络在蛋白质二级结构预测中的应用

介绍了蛋白质二级结构预测的研究意义,讨论了用在蛋白质二级结构预测方面的神经网络设计问题,并且较详尽地评述了近些年来用神经网络方法在蛋白质二级结构预测中的主要工作进展情况,展望了蛋白质结构预测的前景。     

蛋白质二级结构预测服务器PSRSM

蛋白质二级结构预测是蛋白质结构研究的一个重要环节,大量的新预测方法被提出的同时,也不断有新的蛋白质二级结构预测服务器出现。试验选取7种目前常用的蛋白质二级结构预测服务器:PSRSM、SPOT-1D、MUFOLD、Spider3、RaptorX,Psipred和Jpred4,对它们进行了使用方法的介绍和预测效果的评估。随机选取了PDB在2018年8月至11月份发布的180条蛋白质作为测试集,评估角度为:Q3、Sov、边界识别率、内部识别率、转角C识别率,折叠E识别率和螺旋H识别率七种角度。上述服务器180条测试数据的Q3结果分别为:89.96%、88.18%、86.74%、85.77%、83.61%,79.72%和78.29%。结果表明PSRSM的预测结果最好。180条测试集中,以同源性30%,40%,70%分类的实验结果中,PSRSM的Q3结果分别为:89.49%、90.53%、89.87%,均优于其他服务器。实验结果表明,蛋白质二级结构预测可从结合多种深度学习方法以及使用大数据训练模型方向做进一步的研究。     

用人工神经网络方法预测蛋白质超二级结构

蛋白质超二级结构,即由α－螺旋和β－折叠等二级结构单元和连接短肽组成的超二级结构,是蛋白质结构研究中的一个重要层次。目前蛋白质超二级结构的预测工作尚属摸索阶段,还没有成熟的方法。人工神经网络预测方法是近年来在二级结构预测中发展起来的新方法。本文成功的将人工神经网络引入蛋白质超二级结构的预测工作中,结果表明蛋白质的超二级结构的发生与其局域的氨基酸的序列模式有重要联系,可以由蛋白质的一级结构序列预测该     

基于SVM的蛋白质二级结构预测

蛋白质结构预测是现代计算生物领域最重要的问题之一,而蛋白质二级结构预测是蛋白质高级结构预测的基础。目前蛋白质二级结构的预测方法较多,其中SVM方法取得了较高的预测精度。重在阐述使用SVM用于蛋白质二级结构预测的步骤,以及与其他方法进行比较时应该注意的事项,为下一步的研究提供参考及启发。     

蛋白质二级结构预测方法的评价

目前评价蛋白质二级结构预测方法主要考虑预测准确率,并没有充分考虑方法自身参数对方法的影响。本文提出一种新型评价方法,将内在评价与外在评价相结合评价预测方法的优劣。以基于混合并行遗传算法的蛋白质二级结构预测方法为例,通过内在评价,合理选取内在参数——切片长度和组内类别数,有效提高预测准确率,同时,通过外在评价,与其他基于随机算法的蛋白质二级结构预测算法比较和与CASP所提供的结论比较,说明了方法的有效性与正确性,以此验证内在评价和外在评价的客观性、公正性和全面性。     

基于 RBF 神经网络的蛋白质二级结构预测

蛋白质二级结构对于研究其功能具有重要作用。采用主成分分析方法对氨基酸的基本物化属性及其二级结构倾向性进行降维降噪处理,使用径向基神经网络对蛋白质二级结构进行预测。主成分分析使得之前 20 ×12 矩阵变为 20 ×4 矩阵,极大地减少了神经网络输入端的维数。在仿真过程中,当窗口大小为 21,扩展函数为 7 时,预测精确度达到了 71. 81%。实验结果表明 RBF 神经网络可以有效的用于蛋白质二级结构的预测。     

蛋白质二级结构指定

蛋白质二级结构是指蛋白质骨架结构中有规律重复的构象。由蛋白质原子坐标正确地指定蛋白质二级结构是分析蛋白质结构与功能的基础,二级结构的指定对于蛋白质分类、蛋白质功能模体的发现以及理解蛋白质折叠机制有着重要的作用。并且蛋白质二级结构信息广泛应用到蛋白质分子可视化、蛋白质比对以及蛋白质结构预测中。目前有超过20种蛋白质二级结构指定方法,这些方法大体可以分为两大类:基于氢键和基于几何,不同方法指定结果之间的差异较大。由于尚没有蛋白质二级结构指定方法的综述文献,因此,本文主要介绍和总结已有蛋白质二级结构指定方法。     

蛋白质二级结构预测: 基于词条的最大熵马尔科夫方法

提出了一种新的蛋白质二级结构预测方法. 该方法从氨基酸序列中提取出和自然语言中的“词”类似的与物种相关的蛋白质二级结构词条, 这些词条形成了蛋白质二级结构词典, 该词典描述了氨基酸序列和蛋白质二级结构之间的关系. 预测蛋白质二级结构的过程和自然语言中的分词和词性标注一体化的过程类似. 该方法把词条序列看成是马尔科夫链, 通过Viterbi算法搜索每个词条被标注为某种二级结构类型的最大概率, 其中使用词网格描述分词的结果, 使用最大熵马尔科夫模型计算词条的二级结构概率. 蛋白质二级结构预测的结果是最优的分词所对应的二级结构类型. 在4个物种的蛋白质序列上对这种方法进行测试, 并和PHD方法进行比较. 试验结果显示, 这种方法的Q3准确率比PHD方法高3.9%, SOV准确率比PHD方法高4.6%. 结合BLAST搜索的局部相似的序列可以进一步提高预测的准确率. 在50个CASP5目标蛋白质序列上进行测试的结果是: Q3准确率为78.9%, SOV准确率为77.1%. 基于这种方法建立了一个蛋白质二级结构预测的服务器, 可以通过http://www.insun.hit.edu.cn:81/demos/biology/index.html来访问.     

自动编码器方法的蛋白质二级结构预测

蛋白质二级结构预测是进行蛋白质三级结构研究的重要基础,氨基酸的编码方式对二级结构预测有一定的影响。本文应用了一种新的组合编码方式,即将基团编码与位置特异性打分矩阵(PSSM)进行组合的编码方式。本文中提出的基团编码是针对氨基酸的一种新的编码方式,基团编码是根据氨基酸内部组成来进行编码的,由42位属性组成。本文选取位置特异性打分矩阵(PSSM)中的Blosum62进化矩阵和新的基团编码进行组合,形成新的编码方式。然后对CB513和25pdb两组数据分别进行实验。本文中将采用贝叶斯分类器与自动编码器两种方法来对这种新的编码方式进行实验,然后比较这两种方法得到的两组数据的结果。可以很明显的发现采用自动编码器的实验结果要比使用贝叶斯分类器的结果要高出1.65%。在本文的实验中,可以提取特征的自动编码器的预测准确率更好。     

A refined accuracy index to evaluate algorithms of protein secondary structure prediction

Nowadays even a 1% increase of the accuracy for the secondary structure prediction is considered remarkable progress. In this case, we have to consider the reasonableness of the accuracy index Q3, which is used widely. A refined accuracy index, called Q8, is proposed to evaluate algorithms of secondary structure prediction. It is shown that Q8 is superior to the widely used index Q3 in that the former carries more information of the predictive accuracy matrix than does the latter. Therefore, algorithms are evaluated more objectively by Q8 than Q3. Based on 396 nonhomologous proteins, five currently available algorithms of secondary structure prediction were evaluated and compared using the new index Q8. Of the five algorithms, PHD turned out to be the unique algorithm, with Q8 accuracy better than 70%. It is suggested that Q3 should be replaced by Q8 in evaluating secondary structure prediction in future studies.     

A seqlet-based maximum entropy Markov approach for protein secondary structure prediction

A novel method for predicting the secondary structures of proteins from amino acid sequence has been presented. The protein secondary structure seqlets that are analogous to the words in natural language have been extracted. These seqlets will capture the relationship between amino acid sequence and the secondary structures of proteins and further form the protein secondary structure dictionary. To be elaborate, the dictionary is organism-specific. Protein secondary structure prediction is formulated as an integrated word segmentation and part of speech tagging problem. The word-lattice is used to represent the results of the word segmentation and the maximum entropy model is used to calculate the probability of a seqlet tagged as a certain secondary structure type. The method is markovian in the seqlets, permitting efficient exact calculation of the posterior probability distribution over all possible word segmentations and their tags by viterbi algorithm. The optimal segmentations and their tags are computed as the results of protein secondary structure prediction. The method is applied to predict the secondary structures of proteins of four organisms respectively and compared with the PHD method. The results show that the performance of this method is higher than that of PHD by about 3.9% Q3 accuracy and 4.6% SOV accuracy. Combining with the local similarity protein sequences that are obtained by BLAST can give better prediction. The method is also tested on the 50 CASP5 target proteins with Q₃ accuracy 78.9% and SOV accuracy 77.1%. A web server for protein secondary structure prediction has been constructed which is available at http://www.insun.hit.edu.cn:81/demos/biology/index.html.     

A seqlet-based maximum entropy Markov approach for protein secondary structure prediction

1 Introduction The prediction of protein structure and function from amino acid sequences is one of the most impor-tant problems in molecular biology. This problem is becoming more pressing as the number of known pro-tein sequences is explored as a result of genome and other sequencing projects, and the protein sequence- structure gap is widening rapidly[1]. Therefore, com-putational tools to predict protein structures are needed to narrow the widening gap. Although the prediction of three dim…     

Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans

Prediction of transmembrane spans and secondary structure from the protein sequence is generally the first step in the structural characterization of (membrane) proteins. Preference of a stretch of amino acids in a protein to form secondary structure and being placed in the membrane are correlated. Nevertheless, current methods predict either secondary structure or individual transmembrane states. We introduce a method that simultaneously predicts the secondary structure and transmembrane spans from the protein sequence. This approach not only eliminates the necessity to create a consensus prediction from possibly contradicting outputs of several predictors but bears the potential to predict conformational switches, i.e., sequence regions that have a high probability to change for example from a coil conformation in solution to an α‐helical transmembrane state. An artificial neural network was trained on databases of 177 membrane proteins and 6048 soluble proteins. The output is a 3 × 3 dimensional probability matrix for each residue in the sequence that combines three secondary structure types (helix, strand, coil) and three environment types (membrane core, interface, solution). The prediction accuracies are 70.3% for nine possible states, 73.2% for three‐state secondary structure prediction, and 94.8% for three‐state transmembrane span prediction. These accuracies are comparable to state‐of‐the‐art predictors of secondary structure (e.g., Psipred) or transmembrane placement (e.g., OCTOPUS). The method is available as web server and for download at www.meilerlab.org . Proteins 2013; 81:1127–1140. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A probabilistic model for secondary structure prediction from protein chemical shifts

Protein chemical shifts encode detailed structural information that is difficult and computationally costly to describe at a fundamental level. Statistical and machine learning approaches have been used to infer correlations between chemical shifts and secondary structure from experimental chemical shifts. These methods range from simple statistics such as the chemical shift index to complex methods using neural networks. Notwithstanding their higher accuracy, more complex approaches tend to obscure the relationship between secondary structure and chemical shift and often involve many parameters that need to be trained. We present hidden Markov models (HMMs) with Gaussian emission probabilities to model the dependence between protein chemical shifts and secondary structure. The continuous emission probabilities are modeled as conditional probabilities for a given amino acid and secondary structure type. Using these distributions as outputs of first‐ and second‐order HMMs, we achieve a prediction accuracy of 82.3%, which is competitive with existing methods for predicting secondary structure from protein chemical shifts. Incorporation of sequence‐based secondary structure prediction into our HMM improves the prediction accuracy to 84.0%. Our findings suggest that an HMM with correlated Gaussian distributions conditioned on the secondary structure provides an adequate generative model of chemical shifts. Proteins 2013; © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Multiple linear regression for protein secondary structure prediction

In the present work, a novel method was proposed for prediction of secondary structure. Over a database of 396 proteins (CB396) with a three-state-defining secondary structure, this method with jackknife procedure achieved an accuracy of 68.8% and SOV score of 71.4% using single sequence and an accuracy of 73.7% and SOV score of 77.3% using multiple sequence alignments. Combination of this method with DSC, PHD, PREDATOR, and NNSSP gives Q3 = 76.2% and SOV = 79.8%.     

Information on the secondary structure improves the quality of protein sequence alignment

The most popular algorithms employed in the pairwise alignment of protein primary structures (Smith-Watermann (SW) algorithm, FASTA, BLAST, etc.) only analyze the amino acid sequence. The SW algorithm is the most accurate, yielding alignments that agree best with superimpositions of the corresponding spatial structures of proteins. However, even the SW algorithm fails to reproduce the spatial structure alignment when the sequence identity is lower than 30%. The objective of this work was to develop a new and more accurate algorithm taking the secondary structure of proteins into account. The alignments generated by this algorithm and having the maximal weight with the secondary structure considered proved to be more accurate than SW alignments. With sequences having less than 30% identity, the accuracy (i.e., the portion of reproduced positions of a reference alignment obtained by superimposing the protein spatial structures) of the new algorithm is 58 vs. 35% of the SW algorithm. The accuracy of the new algorithm is much the same with secondary structures established experimentally or predicted theoretically. Hence, the algorithm is applicable to proteins with unknown spatial structures. The program is available at ftp://194.149.64.196/STRUSWER/.     

A critique of the utility of the prediction of protein secondary structure

The Chou-Fasman predictive algorithm for determining the secondary structure of proteins from the primary sequence is reviewed. Many examples of its use are presented which illustrate its wide applicability, such as predicting (a) regions with the potential for conformational change, (b) sequences which are capable of assuming several conformations in different environments, (c) effects of single amino acid mutations, (d) amino acid replacements in synthesis of peptides to bring about a change in conformation, (e) guide to the synthesis of polypeptides with definitive secondary structure,e.g. signal sequences, (f) conformational homologues from varying sequences and (g) the amino acid requirements for amphiphilicα-helical peptides.