The other side of the coin: Hypersociability

Affiliative social motivation and behavior, that is, sociability that includes attachment, prosocial behavior (sharing, caring and helping) and empathy (the ability to understand and share the feelings of others), has high variability in the human population, with a portion of people outside of the normal range. While psychiatric disorders and autism spectrum disorders are typically associated with a deficit in social behavior, the opposite trait of hypersociability and indiscriminate friendliness are exhibited by individual with specific neurodevelopmental disorders and following early adverse care. Here we discuss both genetic and environmental factors that cause or increase the risk for developing pathological hypersociability from human to rodent models.     

Protein and DNA destabilization by osmolytes: the other side of the coin

Osmolytes are naturally occurring small molecules accumulated intracellularly to protect organisms from various denaturing stresses. Similar to the two faces of a coin, several of these osmolytes are stabilizing and destabilizing proteins depending on the concentrations and/or solvent conditions. For example, the well known stabilizing osmolyte, trehalose destabilizes some proteins at high concentration and/or high pH. In spite of the fact that destabilizing aspects of osmolytes can modulate many cellular processes including regulation of protein homeostasis (proteostasis), protein-protein interaction, and protein-DNA interaction, researchers have mostly focused on the stabilizing aspects of osmolytes. Thus, it is important to look into both aspects of osmolytes to determine their precise role under physiological conditions. In this article, we have discussed both stabilizing and destabilizing/denaturant aspects of osmolytes to uncover both sides of the coin.     

PTPs versus PTKs: the redox side of the coin

The phosphorylation of tyrosine, and to a lesser extent threonine and serine, plays a key role in the regulation of signal transduction during a plethora of eukaryotic cell functions, including cell activation, cell-cycle progression, cytoskeletal rearrangement and cell movement, differentiation, apoptosis and metabolic homeostasis. In vivo, tyrosine phosphorylation is reversible and dynamic; the phosphorylation states are governed by the opposing activities of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs)2 and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as cellular messengers in cellular processes such as mitogenic signal transduction, gene expression, regulation of cell proliferation, senescence and apoptosis. Redox regulated proteins include PTPs and PTKs, although with opposite regulation of enzymatic activity. Transient oxidation of thiols in PTPs leads to their inactivation by the formation of either an intramolecular S-S bridge or a sulfenyl-amide bond. Conversely, oxidation of PTKs leads to their activation, either by direct SH modification or, indirectly, by concomitant inhibition of PTPs that guides to sustained activation of PTKs. This review focuses on the redox regulation of both PTPs and PTKs and the interplay of their specular regulation.     

ReviewPTPs versus PTKs: The redox side of the coin

The phosphorylation of tyrosine, and to a lesser extent threonine and serine, plays a key role in the regulation of signal transduction during a plethora of eukaryotic cell functions, including cell activation, cell-cycle progression, cytoskeletal rearrangement and cell movement, differentiation, apoptosis and metabolic homeostasis. In vivo, tyrosine phosphorylation is reversible and dynamic; the phosphorylation states are governed by the opposing activities of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs)² and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as cellular messengers in cellular processes such as mitogenic signal transduction, gene expression, regulation of cell proliferation, senescence and apoptosis. Redox regulated proteins include PTPs and PTKs, although with opposite regulation of enzymatic activity. Transient oxidation of thiols in PTPs leads to their inactivation by the formation of either an intramolecular S–S bridge or a sulfenyl–amide bond. Conversely, oxidation of PTKs leads to their activation, either by direct SH modification or, indirectly, by concomitant inhibition of PTPs that guides to sustained activation of PTKs. This review focuses on the redox regulation of both PTPs and PTKs and the interplay of their specular regulation.     

The other side of the coin: dissecting molecular mechanisms behind hereditary breast cancer in search of therapeutic opportunities

Over the last quarter century several genetic alterations have been implicated in hereditary breast cancer (HBC). Two papers recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine explored the mutation prevalence in breast cancer predisposition genes across a large population of affected and unaffected subjects. These analyses designated ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C and RAD51D as the core set of genes associated with a significantly increased risk of developing breast cancer. A deeper understanding of the biological role of these genes unearths an intricate mechanism involving DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Exploiting these inherited alterations for targeted treatments, as is currently the case with PARP inhibitors, may provide additional therapeutic opportunities for HBC patients.     

Tissue-based class control: the other side of tolerance

In this Essay, we offer a new perspective on how immune responses are regulated. We do not cover how they are turned on and off, but focus instead on the second major aspect of an immune response: the control of effector class. Although it is generally thought that the class of an immune response is tailored to fit the invading pathogen, we suggest here that it is primarily tailored to fit the tissue in which the response occurs. To this end, we cover such topics as the nature of T helper (T(H)) cell subsets (current and yet to be discovered), the nature of privileged sites, the difference between oral tolerance and oral vaccination, why the route of immunization matters, whether the T(H)1-type response is really the immune system's primary defense, and whether there might be a different role for some regulatory T cells.     

Cell-penetrating peptides: breaking through to the other side

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been previously shown to be powerful transport vector tools for the intracellular delivery of a large variety of cargoes through the cell membrane. Intracellular delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA), oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), proteins and peptides, contrast agents, drugs, as well as various nanoparticulate pharmaceutical carriers (e.g., liposomes, micelles) has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. This review focuses on the peptide-based strategy for intracellular delivery of CPP-modified nanocarriers to deliver small molecule drugs or DNA. In addition, we discuss the rationales for the design of 'smart' pharmaceutical nanocarriers in which the cell-penetrating properties are hidden until triggered by exposure to appropriate environmental conditions (e.g., a particular pH, temperature, or enzyme level), applied local microwave, ultrasound, or radiofrequency radiation.     

Theca interna: the other side of bovine follicular atresia

Currently, histological classifications of ovarian follicular atresia are almost exclusively based on the morphology of the membrana granulosa without reference to the theca interna. Atresia in the bovine small antral ovarian follicle has been redefined into antral or basal atresia where cell death commences initially within antral or basal regions of the membrana granulosa, respectively. To examine cell death in the theca interna in the two types of atretic follicles, bovine ovaries were collected and processed for immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Follicles were classified as healthy, antral atretic, or basal atretic. Follicle diameter was recorded and sections stained with lectin from Bandeiraea simplicifolia to identify endothelial cells or with an antibody to cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage to identify steroidogenic cells and combined with TUNEL labeling to identify dead cells. The numerical density of steroidogenic cells within the theca interna was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in basal atretic follicles in comparison with other follicles. Cell death was greater in both endothelial cells (P < 0.05) and steroidogenic cells (P < 0.01) of the theca interna of basal atretic follicles compared with healthy and antral atretic follicles. Thus, we conclude that the theca interna is susceptible to cell death early in atresia, particularly in basal atretic follicles.     

FLC or not FLC: the other side of vernalization

Vernalization is the promotion of the competence for floweringby long periods of low temperatures such as those typicallyexperienced during winters. In Arabidopsis, the vernalizationresponse is, to a large extent, mediated by the repression ofthe floral repressor FLC, and the stable epigenetic silencingof FLC after cold treatments is essential for vernalization.In addition to FLC, other vernalization targets exist in Arabidopsis.In grasses, vernalization seems to be entirely independent ofFLC. Here, the current understanding of FLC-independent branchesof the vernalization pathway in Arabidopsis and vernalizationwithout FLC in grasses is discussed. This review focuses onthe role of AGL19, AGL24, and the MAF genes in Arabidopsis.Interestingly, vernalization acts through related molecularmachineries on distinct targets. In particular, protein complexessimilar to Drosophila Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 play a prominentrole in establishing an epigenetic cellular memory for cold-regulatedexpression states of AGL19 and FLC. Finally, the similar networktopology of the apparently independently evolved vernalizationpathways of grasses and Arabidopsis is discussed. Key words: AGL19, Arabidopsis, chromatin, epigenetics, FLC, flowering time, polycomb, PRC2, vernalization Received 19 December 2007; Revised 11 February 2008 Accepted 15 February 2008