CpG island hypermethylation of BRCA1 and loss of pRb as co-occurring events in basal/triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) occurs in approximately 15% of all breast cancer patients, and the incidence of TNBC is greatly increased in BRCA1 mutation carriers. This study aimed to assess the impact of BRCA1 promoter methylation with respect to breast cancer subtypes in sporadic disease. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed representing tumors from 303 patients previously screened for BRCA1 germline mutations, of which a subset of 111 sporadic tumors had previously been analyzed with respect to BRCA1 methylation. Additionally, a set of eight tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers were included on the TMAs. Expression analysis was performed on TMAs by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BRCA1, pRb, p16, p53, PTEN, ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR, MUC1 and Ki-67. Data on BRCA1 aberrations and IHC expression was examined with respect to breast cancer-specific survival. The results demonstrate that CpG island hypermethylation of BRCA1 significantly associates with the basal/triple-negative subtype. Low expression of pRb, and high/intense p16, were associated with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, and the same effects were seen in BRCA1 mutated tumors. The expression patterns of BRCA1, pRb, p16 and PTEN were highly correlated, and define a subgroup of TNBCs characterized by BRCA1 aberrations, high Ki-67 (≥40%) and favorable disease outcome. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that epigenetic inactivation of the BRCA1 gene associates with RB/p16 dysfunction in promoting TNBCs. The clinical implications relate to the potential use of targeted treatment based on PARP inhibitors in sporadic TNBCs, wherein CpG island hypermethylation of BRCA1 represents a potential marker of therapeutic response.     

Contribution of epigenetic alteration of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast carcinomas in Tunisian patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoter methylation in the pathogenesis of sporadic breast cancer in Tunisian patients. Methods: Breast carcinoma tissues (n = 117) and available paired normal breast tissues (n = 65) from Tunisian women who had no family history were investigated for the methylation status of BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoters using methylation-specific PCR. Breast specimens from women without carcinoma (16 fibroadenomas and 5 mastopathies) were used as control. Results: Hypermethylation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoters was detected respectively in 60.7% and 69.2% of the carcinoma tissues, and in only 7.7% and 4.6% of the paired normal breast tissues. None of the fibroadenomas and mastopathies showed hypermethylation. Correlations were found between BRCA1 and BRCA2 hypermethylation and decrease in their mRNA expression (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively). Moreover, BRCA1 methylation correlates with patients age (p = 0.01) and triple negative (ER?, PR?, HER2?) tumors (p = 0.01). Patients with methylated BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 had a significant prolonged survivals compared to those with unmethylated tumors (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Our results suggest an important role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoter methylation in breast cancer development in the Tunisian population.     

BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood DNA was identified in sporadic breast cancer and controls

Objective Epigenetics, particularly DNA methylation, has recently been shown to be important in breast cancer initiation. We investigated the clinical and prognostic importance of whole blood breast cancer early onset gene 1 (BRCA1) DNA methylation in sporadic breast cancer. Methods Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood cells (PBCs) of 902 breast cancer patients at diagnosis, with no BRCA1 mutation, and 990 control women. DNA methylation was measured by quantitative analysis of methylated alleles (QAMA) to estimate the extent of methylation of 2 CpG sites in the promoter region of BRCA1 oncosuppressor. Results BRCA1 promoter methylation rate in PBCs was 47.1% with a 95% confidence interval [46.1; 48.1] in breast cancer patients, and 45.9% with a 95% confidence interval [45.0; 46.8] in controls. We found a trend toward BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation in PBCs of sporadic breast cancer patients compared with controls. Association between methylation and clinicopathological features was evaluated using statistical tests. BRCA1 promoter methylation in PBCs increased significantly in breast cancer patients compared with controls, for age over 70 years (p = 0.022), in post-menopausal status (p = 0.013), for a body mass index (BMI) <20 (p = 0.0095) or a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) ≤76.8 (p = 0.0027). We also found an association of increased BRCA1 promoter methylation in PBCs with ACA/ACA genotype for the SNP Thr594Thr in ESR (estrogen receptor gene), known to be associated with breast cancer risk (p = 0.092), reflecting the reduced presence of this genotype in this breast cancer case-control study. Conclusion Analysis of site-specific DNA methylation in PBCs by QAMA provides quantitative DNA methylation values that may serve as important prognostic indicators.     

Studies on the Methylation Status of CpG Sequences Located in Promoters of Selected Tumour Suppressor Genes in Breast Cancer Cells

In the tested samples of sporadic breast cancer (100 cases), hypermethylation of CpG sequences located in ERα promoter was observed in 62 cases. It correlated with: (i) deficiency of ERα protein in 45%, (ii) hypermethylation of BRCA1 promoter in 95%, and (iii) nonmethylated E-cadherin promoter in 90%. Fifty-eight percent of the patients with nonmethylated E-cadherin promoter (56 cases) did not show metastasis to lymphatic nodes. The analysis of the methylation level of the promoter of ERα, BRCA1, and E-cadherin, frequently connected with their activity, shows that it can be an important parameter in the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies in sporadic breast cancer.     

Promoter hypermethylation of BRCA1 correlates with absence of expression in hereditary breast cancer tumors

Germline mutations in BRCA1 account for a low proportion of hereditary cases in diverse populations. Several efforts have been made to find new genes involved in the inheritance of breast cancer with no success until today. The participation of BRCA1 in the development of breast cancer has been proposed in several studies where hypermethylation of its promoter and a decrease in expression has been reported for sporadic cases and one study on familial cases. To explore the participation of BRCA1 in hereditary carcinogenesis through a different mechanism than the inheritance of germline mutations, we studied the methylation status of its promoter in breast tumors, from patients previously screened for BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations. We also determined the presence of the BRCA1 protein in these tumors and correlated both events with tumor grade, hormone receptors and ERBB2 presence. Promoter hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene was detected in 51% of our biopsies, among which 67% did not express the respective protein. This result leads us to suggest that hypermethylation could be considered as an inactivating mechanism for BRCA1 expression, either as a first or second hit. Moreover, a number of biopsies with absence of expression on BRCA1 showed negative detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors, a similar phenotype to BRCA1 mutated breast tumors.     

Impact of Hyperhomocysteinemia on Breast Cancer Initiation and Progression: Epigenetic Perspective

Our recent study showing association of hyperhomocysteinemia and hypomethioninemia in breast cancer and other studies indicating association of hyperhomocysteinemia with metastasis and development of drug resistance in breast cancer cells treated with homocysteine lead us to hypothesize that homocysteine might modulate the expression of certain tumor suppressors, i.e., RASSF1, RARβ1, CNND1, BRCA1, and p21, and might influence prognostic markers such as BNIP3 by inducing epigenetic alteration. To demonstrate this hypothesis, we have treated MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells with different doses of homocysteine and observed dose-dependent inhibition of BRCA1 and RASSF1, respectively. In breast cancer tissues, we observed the following expression pattern: BNIP3 > BRCA1 > RARβ1 > CCND1 > p21 > RASSF1. Hyperhomocysteinemia was positively associated with BRAC1 hypermethylation both in breast cancer tissue and corresponding peripheral blood. Peripheral blood CpG island methylation of BRCA1 in all types of breast cancer and methylation of RASSF1 in ER/PR-negative breast cancers showed positive correlation with total plasma homocysteine. The methylation of RASSF1 and BRCA1 was associated with breast cancer initiation as well as progression, while BRCA1 methylation was associated with DNA damage. Vitamin B₁₂ showed inverse association with the methylation at both the loci. RFC1 G80A and cSHMT C1420T variants showed positive association with methylation at both the loci. Genetic variants influencing remethylation step were associated positively with BRCA1 methylation and inversely with RASSF1 methylation. GCPII C1561T variant showed inverse association with BRCA1 methylation. We found good correlation of BRAC1 (r = 0.90) and RASSF1 (0.92) methylation pattern between the breast cancer tissue and the corresponding peripheral blood. To conclude, elevated homocysteine influences methionine dependency phenotype of breast cancer cells and is associated with breast cancer progression by epigenetic modulation of RASSF1 and BRCA1 .     

Prognostic Significance of Promoter DNA Hypermethylation of cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) Gene in Primary Breast Cancer

Using pharmacological unmasking microarray, we identified promoter DNA methylation of cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) gene in human cancer. In this study, we assessed the clinicopathological significance of CDO1 methylation in primary breast cancer (BC) with no prior chemotherapy. The CDO1 DNA methylation was quantified by TaqMan methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) in 7 BC cell lines and 172 primary BC patients with no prior chemotherapy. Promoter DNA of the CDO1 gene was hypermethylated in 6 BC cell lines except SK-BR3, and CDO1 gene expression was all silenced at mRNA level in the 7 BC cell lines. Quantification of CDO1 methylation was developed using Q-MSP, and assessed in primary BC. Among the clinicopathologic factors, CDO1 methylation level was not statistically significantly associated with any prognostic factors. The log-rank plot analysis elucidated that the higher methylation the tumors harbored, the poorer prognosis the patients exhibited. Using the median value of 58.0 as a cut-off one, disease specific survival in BC patients with CDO1 hypermethylation showed significantly poorer prognosis than those with hypomethylation (p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified that CDO1 hypermethylation was prognostic factor as well as Ki-67 and hormone receptor status. The most intriguingly, CDO1 hypermethylation was of robust prognostic relevance in triple negative BC (p = 0.007). Promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene was robust prognostic indicator in primary BC patients with no prior chemotherapy. Prognostic relevance of the CDO1 promoter DNA methylation is worthy of being paid attention in triple negative BC cancer.     

Thyroid Hormone Receptors Predict Prognosis in BRCA1 Associated Breast Cancer in Opposing Ways

Since BRCA1 associated breast cancers are frequently classified as hormone receptor negative or even triple negative, the application of endocrine therapies is rather limited in these patients. Like hormone receptors that bind to estrogen or progesterone, thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. TRs might be interesting biomarkers - especially in the absence of classical hormone receptors. The current study aimed to investigate whether TRs may be specifically expressed in BRCA1 associated cancer cases and whether they are of prognostic significance in these patients as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases. This study analyzed TRα and TRβ immunopositivity in BRCA1 associated (n = 38) and sporadic breast cancer (n = 86). Further, TRs were studied in MCF7 (BRCA1 wildtype) and HCC3153 (BRCA1 mutated) cells. TRβ positivity rate was significantly higher in BRCA1 associated as compared to sporadic breast cancers (p = 0.001). The latter observation remained to be significant when cases that had been matched for clinicopathological criteria were compared (p = 0.037). Regarding BRCA1 associated breast cancer cases TRβ positivity turned out to be a positive prognostic factor for five-year (p = 0.007) and overall survival (p = 0.026) while TRα positivity predicted reduced five-year survival (p = 0.030). Activation of TRβ resulted in down-modulation of CTNNB1 while TRα inhibition reduced cell viability in HCC3153. However, only BRCA1 wildtype MCF7 cells were capable of rapidly degrading TRα1 in response to T3 stimulation. Significantly, this study identified TRβ to be up-regulated in BRCA1 associated breast cancer and revealed TRs to be associated with patients’ prognosis. TRs were also found to be expressed in triple negative BRCA1 associated breast cancer. Further studies need to be done in order to evaluate whether TRs may become interesting targets of endocrine therapeutic approaches, especially when tumors are triple-negative.     

Statin induces inhibition of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells via PI3K pathway

Primary TNBCs are treated as if they were a single disease entity, yet it is clear they do not behave as a single entity in response to current therapies. Recently, we reported that statins might have a potential benefit for TNBCs associated with ets-1 overexpression. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of PTEN loss in the effects of statin on TNBC cells. In addition, we analyze the relationship between AKT downstream pathways and the effects of statin on TNBC cells. We investigated the effect of a statin on TNBC cells and analyzed the association of PI3K pathways using various TNBC cells in terms of PTEN loss and AKT pathways. Simvastatin treatments resulted in decreased cell viabilities in various TNBC cell lines. Compared with PTEN wild-type TNBC cells, PTEN mutant-type TNBC cells showed a decreased response to simvastatin. Expressions of phosphorylated Akt and total Akt showed an inverse relationship with PTEN expression. The TNBC cell lines, which showed increased expression of p-Akt, appeared to attenuate the expression of p-Akt by PTEN loss in simvastatin-treated TNBC cells. The Akt inhibitor, LY294002, augmented the effect of simvastatin on PTEN wild-type TNBC cells. Simvastatin induces inhibition of TNBC cells via PI3K pathway activation.     

High Levels of Nucleolar Spindle-Associated Protein and Reduced Levels of BRCA1 Expression Predict Poor Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose

Nucleolar spindle-associated protein (NuSAP1) is an important mitosis-related protein, and aberrant NuSAP1 expression is associated with abnormal spindles and mitosis. This study investigated the prognostic value of NuSAP1 in breast cancer.

Methods

Two sets of tissue microarrays (TMAs) that included samples from 450 breast cancer patients were constructed, of which 250 patients were training set and the other 200 patients were validation set. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to determine the NuSAP1 levels. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the prognostic value of NuSAP1 in breast cancer. A stepwise Cox analysis was performed to construct a risk-prediction model for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). All statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software.

Results

There were 108 (43.5%) and 88 (44.0%) patients expressed NuSAP1 in the training set and validation set respectively. High levels of NuSAP1 expression were related to poor disease-free survival (DFS) in both training (P = 0.028) and validation (P = 0.006) cohorts, particularly in TNBC. With combination of two cohorts, both NuSAP1 (HR = 4.136, 95% CI: 1.956–8.747, P < 0.001) and BRCA1 (HR = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.160–0.915, P = 0.031) were independent prognostic indicators of DFS in TNBC. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the combination of NuSAP1 and BRCA1 significantly improved the prognostic power compared with the traditional model (0.778 versus 0.612, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our study confirms the prognostic value of NuSAP1 in breast cancer. The combination of NuSAP1 and BRCA1 could improve the DFS prediction accuracy in TNBC.     

Triple Negative Breast Cancers Have a Reduced Expression of DNA Repair Genes

DNA repair is a key determinant in the cellular response to therapy and tumor repair status could play an important role in tailoring patient therapy. Our goal was to evaluate the mRNA of 13 genes involved in different DNA repair pathways (base excision, nucleotide excision, homologous recombination, and Fanconi anemia) in paraffin embedded samples of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to luminal A breast cancer (LABC). Most of the genes involved in nucleotide excision repair and Fanconi Anemia pathways, and CHK1 gene were significantly less expressed in TNBC than in LABC. PARP1 levels were higher in TNBC than in LABC. In univariate analysis high level of FANCA correlated with an increased overall survival and event free survival in TNBC; however multivariate analyses using Cox regression did not confirm FANCA as independent prognostic factor. These data support the evidence that TNBCs compared to LABCs harbour DNA repair defects.     

BRCA1 epigenetic inactivation predicts sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer development. Both genes are involved in DNA repair, and tumors harboring genetic defects in them are thought to be more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents used in chemotherapy. However, as only a minority of breast and ovarian cancer patients carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, few patients are likely to benefit from these pharmacogenetic biomarkers. Herein, we show that, in cancer cell lines and xenografted tumors, BRCA1 CpG island promoter hypermethylation-associated silencing also predicts enhanced sensitivity to platinum-derived drugs to the same extent as BRCA1 mutations. Most importantly, BRCA1 hypermethylation proves to be a predictor of longer time to relapse and improved overall survival in ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.     

RAD6B is a major mediator of triple negative breast cancer cisplatin resistance: Regulation of translesion synthesis/Fanconi anemia crosstalk and BRCA1 independence

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with few therapy options besides chemotherapy. Although platinum-based drugs have shown initial activity in BRCA1-mutated TNBCs, chemoresistance remains a challenge. Here we show that RAD6B (UBE2B), a principal mediator of translesion synthesis (TLS), is overexpressed in BRCA1 wild-type and mutant TNBCs, and RAD6B overexpression correlates with poor survival. Pretreatment with a RAD6-selective inhibitor, SMI#9, enhanced cisplatin chemosensitivity of BRCA1 wild-type and mutant TNBCs. SMI#9 attenuated cisplatin-induced PCNA monoubiquitination (TLS marker), FANCD2 (Fanconi anemia (FA) activation marker), and TLS polymerase POL η. SMI#9-induced decreases in γH2AX levels were associated with concomitant inhibition of H2AX monoubiquitination, suggesting a key role for RAD6 in modulating cisplatin-induced γH2AX via H2AX monoubiquitination. Concordantly, SMI#9 inhibited γH2AX, POL η and FANCD2 foci formation. RAD51 foci formation was unaffected by SMI#9, however, its recruitment to double-strand breaks was inhibited. Using the DR-GFP-based assay, we showed that RAD6B silencing or SMI#9 treatment impairs homologous recombination (HR) in HR-proficient cells. DNA fiber assays confirmed that restart of cisplatin-stalled replicating forks is inhibited by SMI#9 in both BRCA1 wild-type and mutant TNBC cells. Consistent with the in vitro data, SMI#9 and cisplatin combination treatment inhibited BRCA1 wild-type and mutant TNBC growth as compared to controls. These RAD6B activities are unaffected by BRCA1 status of TNBCs suggesting that the RAD6B function in TLS/FA crosstalk could occur in HR-dependent and independent modes. Collectively, these data implicate RAD6 as an important therapeutic target for TNBCs irrespective of their BRCA1 status.     

Promoter Hypermethylation in Tumor Suppressing Genes p16 and FHIT and Their Relationship with Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Patients from Northern India

BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation has been recognized in human breast carcinogenesis as a common molecular alteration associated with the loss of expression of a number of key regulatory genes. The present study was undertaken to determine whether methylation and expression of p16 and FHIT genes would correlate with the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. METHODS: Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis were performed to study the methylation of p16 and FHIT genes in 351 pairs of malignant/normal breast tissues. We examined the expression of ER and PR in those specimens by immunohistochemistry. Mutations of p16 and FHIT genes in tumors were detected by direct sequencing. RESULTS: The frequency of hypermethylation was 31.9% and 36.8% in p16 and FHIT genes, respectively, and showed significant harmony in concordant hypermethylation (P < .0001). In postmenopausal patients, methylation frequency in both genes is significantly higher in poorly and moderately differentiated tumors. Loss of protein expression of p16 and FHIT in 77 and 74 tumors, respectively, is associated with their methylation status in premenopausal women. CONCLUSION: We did not find any significant differences in tumor-related gene methylation patterns relevant to both ER and PR status of breast tumors.     

pRb or its cousins: Who controls the family business?

Comment on: Bazarov A, et al. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:1008–1013More than 90% of human cancers are of epithelial origin. Cellular senescence of human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) is an important barrier that protects cells from immortalization; the first step in breast cancer development.¹ Although induction of tumor suppressor p16 is not evident in some types of normal human fibroblasts undergoing senescence,² in cultured HMECs, senescence occurs by a robust p16 induction, and cells that acquire silencing of p16Ink4a locus eventually proliferate and undergo senescence again by telomere shortening in a p53-dependent manner.¹ Therefore, p16 induction is a critical barrier to immortalize HMECs in culture. p16 inhibits kinase activity of Cdk4/6-cyclinD complexes, which inactivate three pRb family proteins: pRb, p107 and p130. However, the relative contribution of these three pRb family proteins to HMEC senescence is not well understood.In a recent issue of Cell Cycle, Bazarov et al. examined the role of each pRb family protein in p16-mediated senescence in breast cancer cell lines and in HMECs (Fig. 1).³ They showed that knockdown of each of the three pRb family proteins individually did not abrogate senescence mediated by ectopically expressed p16 in the breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF7. However, the senescence induced by ectopic p16 was abrogated if they introduced E7, which inactivates all three pRb family proteins. Their data suggest that two of pRb family proteins can compensate for the loss of each pRb family protein to induce p16-mediated senescence in these cancer cells. The remaining question is whether all three pRb family members play an additive role, and whether the inactivation of at least two members of the pRb family is required to overcome p16-induced senescence in breast cancer cells. On the other hand, they showed that abrogation of pRb, but not of p107 and/ or p130, attenuates senescence in HMECs, suggesting a non-redundant critical role of pRb in HMEC senescence. These data are consistent with a recent report demonstrating that pRb has a non-redundant role in repressing DNA replication during H-ras-induced senescence of human fibroblasts,⁴ and explain why pRb, but not p107 or p130, is frequently mutated in cancer. Interestingly, although abrogation of pRb is critical for HMECs escaping senescence, simultaneous depletion of pRb together with either p107, p130 or both accelerates bypass of senescence. This suggests that p107 and p130 help pRb to trigger/maintain HMEC senescence in culture and possibly in vivo. Although each pRb family protein preferentially binds to different members of the E2F family,⁵ the contribution of each E2F family protein in escaping p16-mediated senescence remains unclear. Therefore, it will be interesting to see whether the critical role of pRb, and a supportive role of p130 and p107, in p16-mediated HMEC senescence depend on how each pRb family protein interacts with an E2F family protein.Open in a separate windowFigure 1. Contribution of pRb family proteins to p16-mediated senescence in breast cancer cells and HMECs. Knockdown of each of the three pRb family proteins in breast cancer cells does not abrogate ectopic p16-induced senescence, suggesting that either two of pRb family proteins can compensate for the loss of each pRb family proteins or all three of pRb family proteins play an additive role in p16-mediated senescence in breast cancer cells. On the other hand, knockdown of pRb, but not of p107 or p130, abrogates HMEC senescence, suggesting a non-redundant critical role for pRb in senescence of HMECs. However, the knockdown of either p107 or p130, in conjunction with pRb depletion, abrogates HMEC senescence more efficiently than pRb knockdown alone. This suggests a supporting role for p107 and p130 in maintaining HMEC senescence.Bazarov et al. also showed that even aggressive p53-negative breast cancer cells undergo cellular senescence upon ectopic p16 expression. These results are quite encouraging from an epigenetic therapy point of view. Silencing of p16 often occurs in breast cancer cells via promoter methylation. During DNA replication, cells require new p16 promoter methylation to keep p16 silenced. The observations of Bazarov et al. suggest that we may be able to stop the growth of even aggressive p53-negative breast cancers in patients by inducing p16 expression in cancer cells using DNA methylation inhibitors. Back to the question of running family business: “it appears that pRb is still the boss, but in some cases, it may get a helping hand from his cousins- p107 and p130.”     

Studies on the methylation status of CpG sequences located in promoters of selected tumour suppressor genes in breast cancer cells

In the tested samples of sporadic breast cancer (100 cases), hypermethylation of CpG sequences located in ERalpha promoter was observed in 62 cases. It correlated with: (i) deficiency of ERalpha protein in 45%, (ii) hypermethylation of BRCA1 promoter in 95%, and (iii) nonmethylated E-cadherin promoter in 90%. Fifty-eight percent of the patients with nonmethylated E-cadherin promoter (56 cases) did not show metastasis to lymphatic nodes. The analysis of the methylation level of the promoter of ERalpha, BRCA1, and E-cadherin, frequently connected with their activity, shows that it can be an important parameter in the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies in sporadic breast cancer.     

Methylation of E-cadherin and hMLH1 genes in Indian sporadic breast carcinomas

Hypermethylation of promoter regions leading to inactivation of tumor suppressor genes is a common event in the progression of several tumor types. We have employed a novel restriction digestion based multiplex PCR assay to analyse the methylation status of promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes (p16, hMLH1, MGMT and E-cadherin) in sporadic breast carcinomas of Indian women. The present results indicated the absence of hypermethylation in promoter region of p16 and MGMT genes. However, 6 of the 19 (31.6%) sporadic breast carcinomas showed hypermethylation in the promoters of two of the genes analysed; three in hMLH1 and another three in E-cad. Since our earlier studies have shown lack of genetic alterations such as missense mutations and deletions in the tumor associated genes-p16, ras and p14ARF in sporadic breast tumors, the epigenetic alterations of the two genes reported in the present study could be of interest and might be among the events in the genesis/progression of sporadic breast carcinomas.