Mutational analysis of assembly and function of the iron-sulfur protein of the cytochromebc 1 complex inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

The iron-sulfur protein of the cytochromebc ₁ complex oxidizes ubiquinol at center P in the protonmotive Q cycle mechanism, transferring one electron to cytochromec ₁ and generating a low-potential ubisemiquinone anion which reduces the low-potential cytochromeb-566 heme group. In order to catalyze this divergent transfer of two reducing equivalents from ubiquinol, the iron-sulfur protein must be structurally integrated into the cytochromebc ₁ complex in a manner which facilitates electron transfer from the iron-sulfur cluster to cytochromec ₁ and generates a strongly reducing ubisemiquinone anion radical which is proximal to theb-566 heme group. This radical must also be sequestered from spurious reactivities with oxygen and other high-potential oxidants. Experimental approaches are described which are aimed at understanding how the iron-sulfur protein is inserted into center P, and how the iron-sulfur cluster is inserted into the apoprotein.     

The pathway of electron transfer in the dimeric QH2: Cytochromec oxidoreductase

The experimental data currently available suggest that QH₂: cytochromec oxidoreductase functions according to a Q-cycle type of mechanism. The molecular weight of the enzyme in a natural or artificial phospholipid bilayer or in solution corresponds to that of a dimer. The pre-steady state kinetics of reduction of the prosthetic groups indicate that the enzyme is functionally dimeric. A double Q cycle is proposed, describing the pathway of electron transfer in the dimeric QH₂: cytochromec oxidoreductase. According to this scheme, the two monomeric halves of the enzyme act in a cooperative fashion to complete the catalytic cycle. It is proposed that high-potential cytochromeb-562 and low-potential cytochromeb-562 act cooperatively, viz. as a functional pair, in the antimycin-sensitive reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol.     

Role of the Rieske Iron–Sulfur Protein Midpoint Potential in the Protonmotive Q-Cycle Mechanism of the Cytochrome bc 1 Complex

The midpoint potential of the [2Fe–2S] cluster of the Rieske iron–sulfurprotein (E _{m 7} = +280mV) is the primary determinant of the rate of electron transfer from ubiquinol to cytochromec catalyzed by the cytochrome bc ₁ complex. As the midpoint potential of the Rieske clusteris lowered by altering the electronic environment surrounding the cluster, theubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity of the bc ₁ complex decreases; between 220 and 280 mV therate changes 2.5-fold. The midpoint potential of the Rieske cluster also affects thepresteady-state kinetics of cytochrome b and c ₁ reduction. When the midpoint potential of the Rieskecluster is more positive than that of the heme of cytochrome c ₁, reduction of cytochrome bis biphasic. The fast phase of b reduction is linked to the optically invisible reduction of theRieske center, while the rate of the second, slow phase matches that of c ₁ reduction. The ratesof b and c ₁ reduction become slower as the potential of the Rieske cluster decreases andchange from biphasic to monophasic as the Rieske potential approaches that of theubiquinone/ubiquinol couple. Reduction of b and c ₁ remain kinetically linked as the midpoint potentialof the Rieske cluster is varied by 180 mV and under conditions where the presteady statereduction is biphasic or monophasic. The persistent linkage of the rates of b and c ₁ reduction isaccounted for by the bifurcated oxidation of ubiquinol that is unique to the Q-cycle mechanism.     

Interaction of horse cytochromec with the photosynthetic reaction center ofRhodospirillum rubrum

Mitochondrial cytochromec (horse), which is a very efficient electron donor to bacterial photosynthetic reaction centersin vitro, binds to the reaction center ofRhodospirillum rubrum with an approximate dissociation constant of 0.3–0.5 µM at pH 8.2 and low ionic strength. The binding site for the reaction center is on the frontside of cytochromec which is the side with the exposed heme edge, as revealed by differential chemical acetylation of lysines of free and reaction-center-bound cytochromec. In contrast, bacterial cytochromec ₂ was found previously to bind to the detergent-solubilized reaction center through its backside, i.e., the side opposite to the heme cleft [Rieder, R., Wiemken, V., Bachofen, R., and Bosshard, H. R. (1985).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128, 120–126]. Binding of mitochondrial cytochromec but not of mitochondrial cytochromec ₂ is strongly inhibited by low concentrations of poly-l-lysine. The results are difficult to reconcile with the existence of an electron transfer site on the backside of cytochromec ₂.     

What information do inhibitors provide about the structure of the hydroquinone oxidation site of ubihydroquinone: Cytochromec oxidoreductase?

The Q cycle mechanism of thebc ₁ complex requires two quinone reaction centers, the hydroquinone oxidation (Q_P) and the quinone reduction (Q_N) center. These sites can be distinguished by the specific binding of inhibitors to either of them. A substantial body of information about the hydroquinone oxidation site has been provided by the analysis of the binding of Q_P site inhibitors to thebc ₁ complex in different redox states and to preparations depleted of lipid or protein components as well as by functional studies with mutantbc ₁ complexes selected for resistance toward the inhibitors. The reaction site is formed by at least five protein segments of cytochromeb and parts of the iron-sulfur protein. At least two different binding sites for Q_P site inhibitors could be detected, one for the methoxyacrylate-type inhibitors binding predominantly to cytochromeb, the other for the chromone-type inhibitors and hydroxyquinones binding predominantly to the iron-sulfur protein. The interactions with the protein segments, between different protein segments, and between protein and ligands (substrate, inhibitors) are discussed in detail and a working model of the Q_P pocket is proposed.     

Identification of the polypeptides in the cytochromeb 6/f complex from spinach chloroplasts with redox-center-carrying subunits

An improved procedure for the isolation of the cytochromeb ₆/f complex from spinach chloroplasts is reported. With this preparation up to tenfold higher plastoquinol-plastocyanin oxidoreductase activities were observed. Like the complex obtained by our previous procedure, the complex prepared by the modified way consisted of five polypeptides with apparent molecular masses of 34, 33, 23, 20, and 17 kD, which we call Ia, Ib, II, III, and IV, respectively. In addition, one to three small components with molecular masses below 6 kD were now found to be present. These polypeptides can be extracted with acidic acetone. Cytochromef, cytochromeb ₆, and the Rieske Fe-S protein could be purified from the isolated complex and were shown to be represented by subunits Ia + Ib, II, and III, respectively. The heterogeneity of cytochromef is not understood at present. Estimations of the stoichiometry derived from relative staining intensities with Coomassie blue and amido black gave 1:1:1:1 for the subunits Ia + Ib/II/III/IV, which is interesting in of the presence of two cytochromesb ₆ per cytochromef. Cytochromef titrated as a single-electron acceptor with a pH-independent midpoint potential of +339 mV between pH 6.5 and 8.3, while cytochromeb ₆ was heterogeneous. With the assumption of two components present in equal amounts, two one-electron transitions withE _m(1)=–40 mV andE _m(2)=–172 at pH 6.5 were derived. Both midpoint potentials were pH-dependent.Abbreviation Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - SDS sodium dodecylsulfate - SDS-PAGE SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - MES 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid     

Organization and function of cytochromeb and ubiquinone in the cristae membrane of beef heart mitochondria

The arrangement and function of the redox centers of the mammalianbc ₁ complex is described on the basis of structural data derived from amino acid sequence studies and secondary structure predictions and on the basis of functional studies (i.e., EPR data, inhibitor studies, and kinetic experiments). Two ubiquinone reaction centers do exist—a QH₂ oxidation center situated at the outer, cytosolic surface of the cristae membrane (Q₀ center), and a Q reduction center (Q _i center) situated more to the inner surface of the cristae membrane. The Q₀ center is formed by theb-566 domain of cytochromeb, the FeS protein, and maybe an additional small subunit, whereas the Q _i center is formed by theb-562 domain of cytochromeb and presumably the 13.4kDa protein (QP-C). The Q binding proteins are proposed to be protein subunits of the Q reaction centers of various multiprotein complexes. The path of electron flow branches at the Q₀ center, half of the electrons flowing via the high-potential cytochrome chain to oxygen and half of the electrons cycling back into the Q pool via the cytochromeb path connecting the two Q reaction centers. During oxidation of QH₂, 2H⁺ are released to the cytosolic space and during reduction of Q, 2H⁺ are taken up from the matrix side, resulting in a net transport across the membrane of 2H⁺ per e^– flown from QH₂ to cytochromec, the H⁺ being transported across the membrane as H (H⁺ + e^–) by the mobile carrier Q. The authors correct their earlier view of cytochromeb functioning as a H⁺ pump, proposing that the redox-linkedpK changes of the acidic groups of cytochromeb are involved in the protonation/deprotonation processes taking place during the reduction and oxidation of Q. The reviewers stress that cytochromeb is in equilibrium with the Q pool via the Q _i center, but not via the Q₀ center. Their view of the mechanisms taking place at the reductase is a Q cycle linked to a Q-pool where cytochromeb is acting as an electron pump.     

A proposed pathway of proton translocation through thebc complexes of mitochondria and chloroplasts

The cytochromebc complexes of the electron transport chain from a wide variety of organisms generate an electrochemical proton gradient which is used for the synthesis of ATP. Proton translocation studies with radiolabeled N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD), the well-established carboxyl-modifying reagent, inhibited proton-translocation 50–70% with minimal effect on electron transfer in the cytochromebc ₁ and cytochromebf complexes reconstituted into liposomes. Subsequent binding studies with cytochromebc ₁ and cytochromebf complexes indicate that DCCD specifically binds to the subunitb and subunitb ₆, respectively, in a time and concentration dependent manner. Further analyses of the results with cyanogen bromide and protease digestion suggest that the probable site of DCCD binding is aspartate 160 of yeast cytochromeb and aspartate 155 or glutamate 166 of spinach cytochromeb ₆. Moreover, similar inhibition of proton translocating activity and binding to cytochromeb and cytochromeb ₆ were noticed with N-cyclo-N-(4-dimethylamino-napthyl)carbodiimide (NCD-4), a fluorescent analogue of DCCD. The spin-label quenching experiments provide further evidence that the binding site for NCD-4 on helix cd of both cytochromeb and cytochromeb ₆ is localized near the surface of the membrane but shielded from the external medium.     

Ubiquinol regeneration by plasma membrane ubiquinone reductase

Summary Several enzyme systems have been proposed to play a role in the maintenance of ubiquinol in membranes other than the inner mitochondrial membrane. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms involved in NADH-driven regeneration of antioxidant ubiquinol at the plasma membrane. Regeneration was measured by quantifying the oxidized and reduced forms of ubiquinone by electrochemical detection after separation by high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma membrane incubation with NADH resulted in the consumption of endogenous ubiquinone, and a parallel increase in ubiquinol levels. The activity showed saturation kinetics with respect to the pyridine nucleotides and was moderately inhibited byp-hydroxymercuribenzoate. Only a slight inhibition was achieved with dicumarol at concentrations reported to fully inhibit DT-diaphorase. Salt-extracted membranes displayed full activity of endogenous ubiquinol regeneration, supporting the participation of an integral membrane protein. In liposomes-reconstituted systems, the purified cytochromeb ₅ reductase catalyzed the reduction of the natural ubiquinone homologue coenzyme Q₁₀ at rates accounting for the activities observed in whole plasma membranes, and decreased the levels of lipid peroxidation. Our data demonstrate the role of the cytochromeb ₅ reductase in the regeneration of endogenous ubiquinol.Abbreviations AAPH 2,2-azobis-(2-amidinopropane) hydrochloride - CoQ coenzyme Q, ubiquinone - CoQH₂ reduced coenzyme Q, ubiquinol - pHMB p-hydroxymercuribenzoate     

Amino acid identities in the three redox center-carrying polypeptides of cytochromebc 1/b 6 f complexes

The comparison of primary structures is extended to 22 cytochromesb orb ₆, 12 cytochromesc ₁ orf, and 8 Rieske FeS proteins. Conclusions are drawn as to their phylogenetic relationship as well as on conserved, functionally important amino acids and secondary structures. The results are in favor of two independent quinone binding sites at opposite surfaces of the membrane, topping one of the two hemes of cytochromeb each.     

How rapid are the internal reactions of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c 2 oxidoreductase?

The temperature dependence of the partial reactions leading to turn-over of the UQH₂:cyt c ₂ oxidoreductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been studied. The redox properties of the cytochrome components show a weak temperature dependence over the range 280–330 K, with coefficients of about 1 m V per degree; our results suggest that the other components show similar dependencies, so that no significant change in the gradient of standard free-energy between components occurs over this temperature range. The rates of the reactions of the high potential chain (the Rieske iron sulfur center, cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, reaction center primary donor) show a weak temperature dependence, indicating an activation energy < 8 kJ per mole for electron transfer in this chain. The oxidation of ubiquinol at the Q_z-site of the complex showed a strong temperature dependence, with an activation energy of about 32 kJ mole^–1. The electron transfer from cytochrome b-566 to cytochrome b-561 was not rate determining at any temperature, and did not contribute to the energy barrier. The activation energy of 32 kJ mole^–1 for quinol oxidation was the same for all states of the quinone pool (fully oxidized, partially reduced, or fully reduced before the flash). We suggest that the activation barrier is in the reaction by which ubiquinol at the catalytic site is oxidized to semiquinone. The most economical scheme for this reaction would have the semiquinone intermediate at the energy level indicated by the activation barrier. We discuss the plausibility of this simple model, and the values for rate constants, stability constant, the redox potentials of the intermediate couples, and the binding constant for the semiquinone, which are pertinent to the mechanism of the ubiquinol oxidizing site.Abbreviations (BChl)₂ P870, primary donor of the photochemical reaction center - b/c ₁ complex ubiquinol: cytochrome c ₂ oxidoreductase - cyt b _H cytochrome b-561 or higher potential cytochrome b - cyt b _L cytochrome b-566, or low potential cytochrome b - cyt c ₁, cyt c ₂, cyt c _t cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, and total cytochrome c (cyt c ₁ and cyt c ₂) - Fe.S Rieske-type iron sulfur center, Q - QH₂ ubiquinone, ubiquinol - Q_z, Q_zH₂, Q_z ^– ubiquinone, ubiquinol, and semiquinone anion of ubiquinone, bound at quinol oxidizing site - Q_z-site ubiquinol oxidizing site (also called Q_o-(outside) - Q_o (Oxidizing) - Q_P (Positive proton potential) site) - Q_c-site uubiquinone reductase site (also called the Q_i-(inside) - Q_R (Reducing), or - Q_N (Negative proton potential) site) - UHDBT 5-(n-undecyl)-6-hydroxy-4,7-dioxobenzothiazol     

Initial purification study of the cytochromeb 561 of bean hypocotyl plasma membrane

Summary The plasma membrane (PM) of higher plants contains a major ascorbate-reducible, high-potentialb-type cytochrome, named cytochromeb ₅₆₁ (cytb ₅₆₁). In this paper a rapid purification protocol for the cytb ₅₆₁ of bean hypocotyls PM is described. An almost 200-fold increase of cytb ₅₆₁ specific concentration was achieved with respect to the PM fraction, which contained about 0.2 nmol of ascorbate-reducible heme per mg protein. The procedure can be performed in one day starting from purified PMs obtained by the phase-partitioning procedure. However, cytb ₅₆₁ proved to be unstable during chromatographic purification and the amount of protein finally recovered was low. Purified cytb ₅₆₁ eluted as a 130,000 Da protein-detergent complex from gel-filtration columns. It was completely reduced by ascorbate and reduced-minus-oxidized spectra showed -, - and -bands at 561, 530, and 429 nm respectively, not unlike the spectra of whole PMs. This work represents an initial approach to the biochemical characterization of the cytb ₅₆₁ of higher plants, formerly suggested to be related to cytb ₅₆₁ of animal chromaffin granules.Abbreviations cytb ₅₆₁ cytochromeb ₅₆₁ - PM plasma membrane - UPV upper-phase vesicles - GSII glucan synthase II - CCR NADH-dependent cytochromec reductase - CCO cytochromec oxidase - TX-100R reduced Triton X-100     

Effect of ubiquinone extraction on the reaction of the mitochondrialbc 1 complex with ferricyanide

Depletion of endogenous ubiquinone by pentane extraction of mitochondrial membranes lowered succinate-ferricyanide reductase activity, whereas quinone reincorporation restored the enzymatic activity as well as antimycin sensitivity. The oxidant-induced cytochromeb extrareduction, normally found upon ferricyanide pulse in intact mitochondria in the presence of antimycin, was lost in ubiquinone-depleted membranes, even if cytochromec was added. Readdition of ubiquinone-2 restored the oxidant-induced extrareduction with an apparent half saturation at 1 mol/molbc ₁ complex saturating at about 5 mol/mol. These findings demonstrate a requirement for the ubiquinone pool of the cytochromeb extrareduction. Since the initial rates of cytochromeb reoxidation upon ferricyanide addition, in the presence of antimycin, did not saturate by any ferricyanide concentration in ubiquinone-depleted mitochondria, a direct chemical reaction between ferricyanide and reduced cytochromeb was postulated. The fact that such direct reaction is much faster in ubiquinone-depleted mitochondria may explain the lower antimycin sensitivity of the succinate ferricyanide reductase activity after removal of endogenous ubiquinone.     

Thebc 1 complexes ofRhodobacter sphaeroides andRhodobacter capsulatus

Photosynthetic bacteria offer excellent experimental opportunities to explore both the structure and function of the ubiquinol-cytochromec oxidoreductase (bc ₁ complex). In bothRhodobacter sphaeroides andRhodobacter capsulatus, thebc ₁ complex functions in both the aerobic respiratory chain and as an essential component of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Because thebc ₁ complex in these organisms can be functionally coupled to the photosynthetic reaction center, flash photolysis can be used to study electron flow through the enzyme and to examine the effects of various amino acid substitutions. During the past several years, numerous mutations have been generated in the cytochromeb subunit, in the Rieske iron-sulfur subunit, and in the cytochromec ₁ subunit. Both site-directed and random mutagenesis procedures have been utilized. Studies of these mutations have identified amino acid residues that are metal ligands, as well as those residues that are at or near either the quinol oxidase (Q_o) site or the quinol reductase (Q_i) site. The postulate that these two Q-sites are located on opposite sides of the membrane is supported by these studies. Current research is directed at exploring the details of the catalytic mechanism, the nature of the subunit interactions, and the assembly of this enzyme.     

A further investigation of the cytochrome<Emphasis Type="Italic"> b</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript>–cytochrome<Emphasis Type="Italic"> c</Emphasis> complex

The interaction of reduced rabbit cytochrome b₅ with reduced yeast iso-1 cytochrome c has been studied through the analysis of ¹H–¹⁵N HSQC spectra, of ¹⁵N longitudinal (R₁) and transverse (R₂) relaxation rates, and of the solvent exchange rates of protein backbone amides. For the first time, the adduct has been investigated also from the cytochrome c side. The analysis of the NMR data was integrated with docking calculations. The result is that cytochrome b₅ has two negative patches capable of interacting with a single positive surface area of cytochrome c. At low protein concentrations and in equimolar mixture, two different 1:1 adducts are formed. At high concentration and/or with excess cytochrome c, a 2:1 adduct is formed. All the species are in fast exchange on the scale of differences in chemical shift. By comparison with literature data, it appears that the structure of one 1:1 adduct changes with the origin or primary sequence of cytochrome b₅.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.Abbreviations HSQC heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy - MD molecular dynamics     

A clarification of the effects of DCCD on the electron transfer and antimycin binding of the mitochondrialbc 1 complex

We have studied in detail the effects of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) on the redox activity of the mitochondrialbc ₁ complex, and on the binding of its most specific inhibitor antimycin. An inhibitory action of the reagent has been found only at high concentration of the diimide and/or at prolonged times of incubation. Under these conditions, DCCD also displaced antimycin from its specific binding site in thebc ₁ complex, but did not apparently change the antimycin sensitivity of the ubiquinol-cytochromec reductase activity. On the other hand, using lower DCCD concentrations and/or short times of incubation, i.e., conditions which usually lead to the specific inhibition of the proton-translocating activity of thebc ₁ complex, no inhibitory effect of DCCD could be detected in the ubiquinol-cytochromec reductase activity. However, a clear stimulation of the rate of cytochromeb reduction in parallel to an inhibition of cytochromeb oxidation has been found under these conditions. On the basis of the present work and of previous reports in the literature about the effects of DCCD on thebc ₁ complex, we propose a clarification of the various effects of the reagent depending on the experimental conditions employed.     

Reaction center and UQH2:cytc 2 oxidoreductase act as independent enzymes inRps. sphaeroides

Turnover of the ubiquinol oxidizing site of the UQH₂:cyt c₂ oxidoreductase (b/c ₁ complex) ofRps. sphaeroides can be assayed by measuring the rate of reduction of cytb ₅₆₁ in the presence of antimycin (AA). Oxidation of ubiquinol is a second-order process, with a value ofk ₂ of about 3 × 10⁵ M^–1. The reaction shows saturation at high quinol concentrations, with an apparentK _m of about 6–8 mM (with respect to the concentration of quinol in the membrane). When the quinone pool is oxidized before illumination, reduction of the complex shows a substantial lag (about 1 ms) after a flash, indicating that the quinol produced as a result of the photochemical reactions is not immediately available to the complex. We have suggested that the lag may be due to several factors, including the leaving time of the quinol from the reaction center, the diffusion time to the complex, and the time for the head group to cross the membrane. We have suggested aminimal value for the diffusion coefficient of ubiquinone in the membrane (assuming that the lag is due entirely to diffusion) of about 10^–9 cm^–2 sec^–1. The lag is reduced to about 100 µsec when the pool is significantly reduced, showing that quinol from the pool is more rapidly available to the complex than that from the reaction center. With the pool oxidized, similar kinetics are seen when the reduction of cytb ₅₆₁ occurs through the AA-sensitive site (with reactions at the quinol oxidizing site blocked by myxothiazol). These results show that there is no preferential reaction pathway for transfer of reducing equivalents from reaction center tob/c ₁ complex. Oxidation of cytb ₅₆₁ through the AA-sensitive site can be assayed from the slow phase of the carotenoid electrochromic change, and by comparison with the kinetics of cytb ₅₆₁. As long as the quinone pool is significantly oxidized, the reaction is not rate-determining for the electrogenic process. On reduction of the pool below 1 quinone per complex, a slowing of the electrogenic process occurs, which could reflect a dependence on the concentration of quinone. If the process is second-order, the rate constant must be about 2–5 times greater than that for quinol oxidation, since the effect on rate is relatively small compared with the effect seen at the quinol oxidizing site when the quinol concentration is changed over theE _h range where the first few quinols are produced on reductive titration. When the quinone pool is extracted (experiments in collaboration with G. Venturoli and B. A. Melandri), the slowing of the electrochromic change on reduction of the pool is not enhanced; we assume that this is due to the fact that a minimum of one quinone per active complex is produced by turnover of the quinol oxidizing site. Two lines of research lead us to revise our previous estimate for the minimal value of the quinone diffusion coefficient. These relate to the relation between the diffusion coefficient and the rate constants for processes involving the quinones: (a) The estimated rate constant for reaction of quinone at the AA-site approaches the calculated diffusion limited rate constant, implying an improbably efficient reaction. (b) From a preliminary set of experiments, the activation energy determined by measuring the variation of the rate constant for quinol oxidation with temperature, is about 8 kcal mol^–1. Although we do not know the contribution of entropic terms to the pre-exponential factor, the result is consistent with a considerably larger value for the diffusion coefficient than that previously suggested.     

Implications of cytochromeb 6/f location for thylakoidal electron transport

The cytochromeb ₆/f complex of higher plant chloroplasts is uniformly distributed throughout both appressed and nonappressed thylakoids, in contrast to photosystem II and photosystem I, the other major membrane protein complexes involved in electron transport. We discuss how this distribution is likely to affect interactions of the cytochromeb ₆/f complex with other electron transport components because of the resulting local stoichiometries, and how these may affect the regulation of electron transport.     

1H NMR studies on ferricytochromec 3 fromDesulfovibrio vulgaris Miyazaki F and its interaction with ferredoxin I

Summary The¹H NMR signals of the heme methyl, propionate and related chemical groups of cytochromec ₃ fromDesulfovibrio vulgaris Miyazaki F (D.v. MF) were site-specifically assigned by means of ID NOE, 2D DQFCOSY and 2D TOCSY spectra. They were consistent with the site-specific assignments of the hemes with the highest and second-lowest redox potentials reported by Fan et al. (Biochemistry,29 (1990) 2257–2263). The site-specific heme assignments were also supported by NOE between the methyl groups of these hemes and the side chain of Val¹⁸. All the results contradicted the heme assignments forD.v. MF cytochromec ₃ made on the basis of electron spin resonance (Gayda et al. (1987)FEBS Lett.,217 57–61). Based on these assignments, the interaction of cytochromec ₃ withD.v. MF ferredoxin I was investigated by NMR. The major interaction site of cytochromec ₃ was identified as the heme with the highest redox potential, which is surrounded by the highest density of positive charges. The stoichiometry and association constant were two cytochromec ₃ molecules per monomer of ferredoxin I and 10⁸ M^–2 (at 53 mM ionic strength and 25°C), respectively.     

Structural aspects of the cytochromeb 6 f complex; structure of the lumen-side domain of cytochromef

The following findings concerning the structure of the cytochromeb ₆ f complex and its component polypeptides, cytb ₆, subunit IV and cytochromef subunit are discussed: