Enhancer Dependent Repositioning of TCRb Locus with Respect to the Chromosome Territory

Intranuclear position of several genes is dynamically altered during development concordant with their activation. To understand this dynamic, but non-random, nuclear organization, it is important to identify the relevant regulatory elements and trans acting factors. Murine TCRb locus gets activated during thymic development. Enhancer Eb is important for VDJ recombination at TCRb locus as it is critically required for establishment of recombination center. Our analysis revealed that TCRb locus gets located out of the chromosome territory specifically in developing thymocytes. Further, CRISPR/Cas9 based deletion mutagenesis established an unambiguous role of enhancer Eb in defining TCRb location relative to chromosome territory. The ability to reposition the target locus relative to chromosome territory highlights a novel aspect pertaining to activity of enhancers which may contribute to their ability to regulate gene expression. Additionally, our observations have implications for understanding the role of enhancers in three-dimensional genome organization and function.     

Efficient identification of regulatory sequences in the chicken genome by a powerful combination of embryo electroporation and genome comparison

Recently expanded knowledge of gene regulation clearly indicates that the regulatory sequences of a gene, usually identified as enhancers, are widely distributed in the gene locus, revising the classical view that they are clustered in the vicinity of genes. To identify regulatory sequences for Sox2 expression governing early neurogenesis, we scanned the 50-kb region of the chicken Sox2 locus for enhancer activity utilizing embryo electroporation, resulting in identification of a number of enhancers scattered throughout the analyzed genomic span. The 'pan-neural' Sox2 expression in early embryos is actually brought about by the composite activities of five separate enhancers with distinct spatio-temporal specificities. These and other functionally defined enhancers exactly correspond to extragenic sequence blocks that are conspicuously conserved between the chicken and mammalian genomes and that are embedded in sequences with a wide range of sequence conservation between humans and mice. The sequences conserved between amniotes and teleosts correspond to subregions of the enhancer subsets which presumably represent core motifs of the enhancers, and the limited conservation partly reflects divergent expression patterns of the gene. The phylogenic distance between the chicken and mammals appears optimal for identifying a battery of genetic regulatory elements as conserved sequence blocks, and chicken embryo electroporation facilitates functional characterization of these elements.     

Highly Conserved Non-Coding Sequences and the 18q Critical Region for Short Stature: A Common Mechanism of Disease?

Background

Isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) are heterogeneous disorders with several different etiologies and they are responsible for most cases of short stature. Mutations in different genes have been identified but still many patients did not present mutations in any of the known genes. Chromosomal rearrangements may also be involved in short stature and, among others, deletions of 18q23 defined a critical region for the disorder. No gene was yet identified.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We now report a balanced translocation X;18 in a patient presenting a breakpoint in 18q23 that was surprisingly mapped about 500 Kb distal from the short stature critical region. It separated from the flanking SALL3 gene a region enriched in highly conserved non-coding elements (HCNE) that appeared to be regulatory sequences, active as enhancers or silencers during embryonic development.

Conclusion

We propose that, during pituitary development, the 18q rearrangement may alter expression of 18q genes or of X chromosome genes that are translocated next to the HCNEs. Alteration of expression of developmentally regulated genes by translocation of HCNEs may represent a common mechanism for disorders associated to isolated chromosomal rearrangements.     

The Main Effect of Chromosomal Rearrangement Is Changing the Action of Regulatory Genes

Effect of chromosomal rearrangements on the expression of mutations was studied in Drosophila melanogaster regulatory genes. These were facultative dominant lethals and recessive lethals on the X chromosome obtained by the classical Muller-5 method. Chromosomal rearrangements drastically changed the expression of regulatory gene mutations. Rearrangements either caused the lethal effect of mutations or suppressed the already present lethality. The action of rearrangements exhibited the maternal or paternal effect. Irrespective of the presence in the genome of mutations of regulatory genes, a rearrangement acted as a factor decreasing fertility of the organism. The rearrangement effect is identical to the expression of regulatory genes per se. It is concluded that the chromosomal rearrangement affects the examined regulatory genes indirectly through a change in the operation of regulatory genes located within the rearrangement. Thus, rearrangements gain great importance for the definition of the pattern of genome functional activity. Widespread distribution of rearrangements in individual genotypes and their effectivity in the process of speciation are thus explained.     

Cell-type-specific long-range looping interactions identify distant regulatory elements of the CFTR gene

Identification of regulatory elements and their target genes is complicated by the fact that regulatory elements can act over large genomic distances. Identification of long-range acting elements is particularly important in the case of disease genes as mutations in these elements can result in human disease. It is becoming increasingly clear that long-range control of gene expression is facilitated by chromatin looping interactions. These interactions can be detected by chromosome conformation capture (3C). Here, we employed 3C as a discovery tool for identification of long-range regulatory elements that control the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene, CFTR. We identified four elements in a 460-kb region around the locus that loop specifically to the CFTR promoter exclusively in CFTR expressing cells. The elements are located 20 and 80 kb upstream; and 109 and 203 kb downstream of the CFTR promoter. These elements contain DNase I hypersensitive sites and histone modification patterns characteristic of enhancers. The elements also interact with each other and the latter two activate the CFTR promoter synergistically in reporter assays. Our results reveal novel long-range acting elements that control expression of CFTR and suggest that 3C-based approaches can be used for discovery of novel regulatory elements.     

Shadow enhancers flanking the HoxB cluster direct dynamic Hox expression in early heart and endoderm development

The products of Hox genes function in assigning positional identity along the anterior–posterior body axis during animal development. In mouse embryos, Hox genes located at the 3′ end of HoxA and HoxB complexes are expressed in nested patterns in the progenitors of the secondary heart field during early cardiogenesis and the combined activities of both of these clusters are required for proper looping of the heart. Using Hox bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), transposon reporters, and transgenic analyses in mice, we present the identification of several novel enhancers flanking the HoxB complex which can work over a long range to mediate dynamic reporter expression in the endoderm and embryonic heart during development. These enhancers respond to exogenously added retinoic acid and we have identified two retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) within these control modules that play a role in potentiating their regulatory activity. Deletion analysis in HoxB BAC reporters reveals that these control modules, spread throughout the flanking intergenic region, have regulatory activities that overlap with other local enhancers. This suggests that they function as shadow enhancers to modulate the expression of genes from the HoxB complex during cardiac development. Regulatory analysis of the HoxA complex reveals that it also has enhancers in the 3′ flanking region which contain RAREs and have the potential to modulate expression in endoderm and heart tissues. Together, the similarities in their location, enhancer output, and dependence on retinoid signaling suggest that a conserved cis-regulatory cassette located in the 3′ proximal regions adjacent to the HoxA and HoxB complexes evolved to modulate Hox gene expression during mammalian cardiac and endoderm development. This suggests a common regulatory mechanism, whereby the conserved control modules act over a long range on multiple Hox genes to generate nested patterns of HoxA and HoxB expression during cardiogenesis.