The Crystal Structure of PF-8, the DNA Polymerase Accessory Subunit from Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus

Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus is an emerging pathogen whose mechanism of replication is poorly understood. PF-8, the presumed processivity factor of Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus DNA polymerase, acts in combination with the catalytic subunit, Pol-8, to synthesize viral DNA. We have solved the crystal structure of residues 1 to 304 of PF-8 at a resolution of 2.8 Å. This structure reveals that each monomer of PF-8 shares a fold common to processivity factors. Like human cytomegalovirus UL44, PF-8 forms a head-to-head dimer in the form of a C clamp, with its concave face containing a number of basic residues that are predicted to be important for DNA binding. However, there are several differences with related proteins, especially in loops that extend from each monomer into the center of the C clamp and in the loops that connect the two subdomains of each protein, which may be important for determining PF-8''s mode of binding to DNA and to Pol-8. Using the crystal structures of PF-8, the herpes simplex virus catalytic subunit, and RB69 bacteriophage DNA polymerase in complex with DNA and initial experiments testing the effects of inhibition of PF-8-stimulated DNA synthesis by peptides derived from Pol-8, we suggest a model for how PF-8 might form a ternary complex with Pol-8 and DNA. The structure and the model suggest interesting similarities and differences in how PF-8 functions relative to structurally similar proteins.Most if not all organisms with DNA genomes have mechanisms to ensure processive DNA synthesis. In bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, DNA polymerase subunits include a catalytic subunit and a processivity factor, often referred to as a “sliding clamp.” In these organisms, a clamp loader protein is required to assemble the processivity factor onto the DNA (27, 37). The bacterial sliding (beta) clamp is made up of homodimers of a subunit that comprises three structurally similar subdomains (26), whereas archaeal and eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is composed of homotrimers that comprise two structurally similar subdomains (27, 37). For both of these clamps, the monomers assemble head-to-tail to form a closed homodimeric or homotrimeric ring, respectively, around the DNA. In these organisms, a clamp loader protein is required to efficiently load the clamp onto DNA, using an ATP-dependent process. Once loaded on DNA, the processivity factor is capable of binding directly to the DNA polymerase, conferring extended strand synthesis without falling off of the template (50).Herpesviruses encode their own DNA polymerases. However, unlike bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, herpesviruses do not encode clamp loaders to assemble their processivity factors onto the DNA. Yet, the accessory subunits of the herpesvirus DNA polymerases still associate with DNA with nanomolar affinity to enable long-chain DNA synthesis (9, 16, 23, 25, 29, 35, 44, 46, 53, 56). Human herpesviruses are divided into three classes, namely, the alpha-, beta-, and gammaherpesviruses, based on homologies found in their genomic organization as well as in protein sequences and function (45). Crystal structures have been determined for the processivity factor UL42 from the alphaherpesvirus herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and for UL44 from the betaherpesvirus human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) (2, 3, 58). Despite having little if any sequence homology with processivity factors outside of their herpesvirus subfamily, these structures all share the “processivity fold” originally seen in the structure of the bacterial beta clamp (26). Interestingly, some of these processivity factors have a different quaternary structure. PCNA forms a head-to-tail trimeric ring (18, 27), HSV-1 UL42 is a monomer (10, 14, 16, 46, 58) equivalent to one-third of the PCNA complex, and HCMV UL44 is a head-to-head dimer in the form of a C-shaped clamp (2, 3, 9).Both HSV-1 UL42 and HCMV UL44 have a basic face that has been shown to be important for interacting with DNA (25, 35). In the case of dimeric HCMV UL44, the basic surface of each monomer faces inward, toward the center of the C clamp, and includes a basic loop, called the “gap loop,” that is thought to wrap around DNA (24). Recently the crystal structure of the bacterial beta clamp was determined in complex with DNA (15). In that structure, DNA was found to be located in the central pore of the clamp. Amino acid residues that interacted with DNA were in positions structurally homologous to those found on the positively charged faces of UL42 and UL44.UL42 and UL44 each also has a surface, facing away from the DNA binding face, that is important for interacting with the catalytic subunit of the viral DNA polymerase. Indeed, both of these proteins have been crystallized in complex with C-terminal peptides from their respective catalytic subunits, HSV-1 UL30 and HCMV UL54 (2, 58). Together with biochemical and mutational analyses, these crystal structures indicated that, although the details of the interaction are different, the catalytic subunit of the polymerase binds to a region including and in close proximity to a long loop that connects the N- and C-terminal subdomains, called the interdomain connector loop (32-34). The corresponding region of PCNA is also important for polymerase attachment and mediates the interactions of PCNA with many other cellular proteins (40). Both UL54 and UL30 were shown to attach to their respective subunits, UL44 and UL42, by way of their extreme C termini. The C-terminal residues responsible for this interaction correspond to amino acids that are not detectably conserved, either by sequence or by structure, among herpesvirus catalytic subunits. The HSV-1 UL30-UL42 interaction involves a groove to one side of the UL42 connector loop, with hydrophilic interactions being critical (58). The HCMV UL54-UL44 interaction involves a crevice near the UL44 connector loop, and hydrophobic interactions are crucial (2, 32, 33). Moreover, the HCMV UL44 crevice is on the opposite side of the connector loop with respect to the HSV-1 UL42 groove.Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), a gammaherpesvirus, encodes a viral DNA polymerase catalytic subunit, Pol-8, and an accessory subunit, PF-8 (4, 7, 8, 29, 48, 57). PF-8 can bind to Pol-8 directly and specifically (8, 29) and is required for long-chain DNA synthesis in vitro (29). Similarly to UL44, PF-8 forms dimers in solution and when bound to DNA (9). Although it is likely that UL44 and PF-8 are the processivity factors for HCMV and KSHV, respectively, rigorous experiments demonstrating this have not been performed. However, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we will refer to these proteins as processivity factors.Here we present the crystal structure of PF-8 and show that PF-8 forms a head-to-head homodimer akin to UL44 but lacking the long gap loops which are thought to wrap around DNA. This suggests that PF-8 binds DNA differently than does UL44 or UL42. Because Pol-8 appears to lack a long, flexible C-terminal tail with a length comparable to those of other herpesvirus Pols, we expect the mode of binding of the catalytic subunit to be different as well. Based on structural data, information from homologs, and initial biochemical results, we were able to identify possible sites for interactions with DNA and Pol-8 and to propose a model for the simultaneous interaction of all three components of the complex. Further, the availability of crystal structures for all three herpesvirus classes provides new insights into comparative structure, function, and evolution.     

Mutational Analysis of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Packaging Protein UL33

The UL33 protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is thought to be a component of the terminase complex that mediates the cleavage and packaging of viral DNA. In this study we describe the generation and characterization of a series of 15 UL33 mutants containing insertions of five amino acids located randomly throughout the 130-residue protein. Of these mutants, seven were unable to complement the growth of the UL33-null virus dlUL33 in transient assays and also failed to support the cleavage and packaging of replicated amplicon DNA into capsids. The insertions in these mutants were clustered between residues 51 and 74 and between 104 and 116, within the most highly conserved regions of the protein. The ability of the mutants to interact with the UL28 component of the terminase was assessed in immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence assays. All four mutants with insertions between amino acids 51 and 74 were impaired in this interaction, whereas two of the three mutants in the second region (with insertions at positions 111 and 116) were not affected. These data indicate that the ability of UL33 to interact with UL28 is probably necessary, but not sufficient, to support viral growth and DNA packaging.During the packaging of the double-stranded DNA genome of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the cleavage of replicated concatemeric viral DNA into single-genome lengths is tightly coupled to its insertion into preassembled spherical procapsids. Upon genome insertion, the internal scaffold protein of the procapsid is lost, and the capsid shell angularizes. Genetic analysis has revealed that successful packaging requires a cis-acting DNA sequence (the a sequence) together with seven proteins, encoded by the UL6, UL15, UL17, UL25, UL28, UL32, and UL33 genes (6, 10). By analogy with double-stranded bacteriophage, the encapsidation of HSV-1 DNA is thought to be mediated by a heteromultimeric terminase enzyme. It is envisaged that the terminase is involved in the recognition of packaging signals present in the concatemers and the association with procapsids via an interaction with the capsid portal protein. Terminase initiates packaging by cleaving at an a sequence present between adjacent genomes within concatemers and subsequently provides energy for genome insertion through the hydrolysis of ATP. Packaging is terminated by a second cleavage event at the next similarly orientated a sequence, resulting in the encapsidation of a unit-length genome.An accumulating body of evidence suggests that the HSV-1 terminase is comprised of the UL15, UL28, and UL33 gene products. Viruses lacking a functional version of any of these three proteins are unable to initiate DNA packaging, and uncleaved concatemers and abortive B-capsids (angularized forms containing scaffold but no DNA) accumulate in the nuclei of infected cells (2, 4, 5, 11, 25, 27, 30, 36, 38). Protein sequence comparisons revealed a distant relationship between UL15 and the large subunit of bacteriophage T4 terminase, gp17, including the presence of Walker A and B box motifs characteristic of ATP binding proteins (13). Subsequent experiments demonstrated that point mutations affecting several of the most highly conserved residues abolished the ability of the resulting mutant viruses to cleave and package viral DNA (26, 39). The UL28 component has been reported to interact with the viral DNA packaging signal (3), a property shared with the homologous protein of human cytomegalovirus (CMV), UL56 (9). Furthermore, both UL15 and UL28 are able to interact with UL6 (33, 37), which form a dodecameric portal complex through which DNA is inserted into the capsid (22, 23, 31). Within the terminase complex, strong interactions have previously been reported between UL15 and UL28 and between UL28 and UL33 (1, 7, 17, 19, 34). Evidence also suggests that UL15 and UL33 may be able to interact directly, albeit more weakly than UL28 and UL33 (7, 15). Temperature-sensitive (ts) lesions in UL33 or UL15 reduced both the interaction of the thermolabile protein with the other members of the terminase complex and viral growth at the nonpermissive temperature (36). Recent evidence suggests that the terminase complex assembles in the cytoplasm and is imported into the nucleus via a mechanism involving a nuclear localization signal within UL15 (35). UL15 is also necessary for the localization of the terminase to nuclear sites of DNA replication and packaging (15). At present, the enzymatic activities necessary for DNA packaging have not been demonstrated for either the complex or individual subunits of the HSV-1 terminase.This study concerns the UL33 protein, which, at 130 residues, is the smallest subunit of the presumptive terminase (7, 27). No specific role in terminase activity has yet been ascribed to UL33, but several possibilities have been proposed including (i) ensuring correct folding or assembly of the complex, (ii) regulating the functions of the other subunits, (iii) performing an essential enzymatic role per se, and (iv) ensuring correct localization of the terminase to sites of DNA packaging (7). However, recent immunofluorescence studies using mutants with defects in the individual terminase subunits suggest that UL33 is unlikely to be involved in this last function (15).In order to further investigate the role of UL33 in the cleavage-packaging process, we utilized transposon-mediated mutagenesis to introduce insertions of five codons throughout the UL33 ORF. We report the generation and characterization of 15 mutants in terms of their ability to support viral growth and DNA packaging and to interact with the terminase component UL28.     

Herpes Simplex Virus UL12.5 Targets Mitochondria through a Mitochondrial Localization Sequence Proximal to the N Terminus

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) gene UL12 encodes a conserved alkaline DNase with orthologues in all herpesviruses. The HSV-1 UL12 gene gives rise to two separately promoted 3′ coterminal mRNAs which encode distinct but related proteins: full-length UL12 and UL12.5, an amino-terminally truncated form that initiates at UL12 codon 127. Full-length UL12 localizes to the nucleus where it promotes the generation of mature viral genomes from larger precursors. In contrast, UL12.5 is predominantly mitochondrial and acts to trigger degradation of the mitochondrial genome early during infection. We examined the basis for these very different subcellular localization patterns. We confirmed an earlier report that the amino-terminal region of full-length UL12 is required for nuclear localization and provide evidence that multiple nuclear localization determinants are present in this region. In addition, we demonstrate that mitochondrial localization of UL12.5 relies largely on sequences located between UL12 residues 185 and 245 (UL12.5 residues 59 to 119). This region contains a sequence that resembles a typical mitochondrial matrix localization signal, and mutations that reduce the positive charge of this element severely impaired mitochondrial localization. Consistent with matrix localization, UL12.5 displayed a detergent extraction profile indistinguishable from that of the matrix protein cyclophilin D. Mitochondrial DNA depletion required the exonuclease activity of UL12.5, consistent with the idea that UL12.5 located within the matrix acts directly to destroy the mitochondrial genome. These results clarify how two highly related viral proteins are targeted to different subcellular locations with distinct functional consequences.All members of the Herpesviridae encode a conserved alkaline DNase that displays limited homology to bacteriophage λ red α (2, 24), an exonuclease that acts in conjunction with the synaptase red β to catalyze homologous recombination between DNA molecules (23). The most thoroughly characterized member of the herpesvirus alkaline nuclease family is encoded by the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) gene UL12 (7, 9, 22). HSV-1 UL12 has both endo- and exonuclease activity (15-17, 36) and binds the viral single-stranded DNA binding protein ICP8 (37, 39) to form a recombinase that displays in vitro strand exchange activity similar to that for red α/β (27). UL12 localizes to the nucleus (26) where it plays an important, but as-of-yet ill-defined, role in promoting the production of mature packaged unit-length linear progeny viral DNA molecules (12, 20), perhaps via a recombination mechanism (27, 28). The importance of UL12 is documented by the observation that UL12 null mutants display a ca. 1,000-fold reduction in the production of infectious progeny virions (41).HSV-1 also produces an amino-terminally truncated UL12-related protein termed UL12.5, which is specified by a separately promoted mRNA that initiates within UL12 coding sequences (7, 9, 21). UL12.5 is translated in the same reading frame as UL12 but initiates at UL12 codon 127 and therefore lacks the first 126 amino acid residues of the full-length protein. UL12.5 retains the nuclease and ICP8 binding activities of UL12 (4, 14, 26) but does not accumulate to high levels in the nucleus (26) and is unable to efficiently substitute for UL12 in promoting viral genome maturation (14, 21). We recently showed that UL12.5 localizes predominantly to mitochondria, where it triggers massive degradation of the host mitochondrial genome early during HSV infection (31). Mammalian mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA) is a 16.5-kb double-stranded circle located within the mitochondrial matrix that encodes 13 proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation and the RNA components of the mitochondrial translational apparatus (reviewed in reference 10). Inherited mutations that inactivate or deplete mt DNA impair oxidative phosphorylation, leading to a wide range of pathological conditions, including neuropathy and myopathy (reviewed in references 8 and 40). Thus, although the contribution of mt DNA depletion to the biology of HSV infection has yet to be determined, it likely has a major negative impact on host cell functions.UL12 and UL12.5 provide a striking example of a pair of highly related proteins that share a common biochemical activity yet differ markedly in subcellular location and biological function. The basis for their distinct subcellular localization patterns is of considerable interest, as the only difference in the primary sequences is that UL12.5 lacks the first 126 residues of UL12. Reuven et al. (26) demonstrated that this UL12-specific region contains one or more signals able to target enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) to the nucleus. However, the determinants of the mitochondrial localization of UL12.5 have not been previously examined. Most proteins that are imported into the mitochondrial matrix bear a matrix targeting sequence that is located at or close to the amino terminus (reviewed in references 25 and 38). We speculated that UL12.5 bears such an amino-terminal matrix targeting sequence and that the function of this element is masked in the full-length UL12 protein by the UL12-specific amino-terminal extension, which contains the nuclear localization signal(s) (NLS). Our results broadly support this hypothesis and indicate that the mitochondrial localization sequence of UL12.5 is located ca. 60 residues from its N terminus.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).     

Isolation of Human Monoclonal Antibodies That Potently Neutralize Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Targeting Different Epitopes on the gH/gL/UL128-131A Complex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a widely circulating pathogen that causes severe disease in immunocompromised patients and infected fetuses. By immortalizing memory B cells from HCMV-immune donors, we isolated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies that neutralized at extremely low concentrations (90% inhibitory concentration [IC₉₀] values ranging from 5 to 200 pM) HCMV infection of endothelial, epithelial, and myeloid cells. With the single exception of an antibody that bound to a conserved epitope in the UL128 gene product, all other antibodies bound to conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex. Antibodies against gB, gH, or gM/gN were also isolated and, albeit less potent, were able to neutralize infection of both endothelial-epithelial cells and fibroblasts. This study describes unusually potent neutralizing antibodies against HCMV that might be used for passive immunotherapy and identifies, through the use of such antibodies, novel antigenic targets in HCMV for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting previously unknown neutralizing antibody responses.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the herpesvirus family which is widely distributed in the human population and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients and upon infection of the fetus. HCMV infection causes clinical disease in 75% of patients in the first year after transplantation (58), while primary maternal infection is a major cause of congenital birth defects including hearing loss and mental retardation (5, 33, 45). Because of the danger posed by this virus, development of an effective vaccine is considered of highest priority (51).HCMV infection requires initial interaction with the cell surface through binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (8) and possibly other surface receptors (12, 23, 64, 65). The virus displays a broad host cell range (24, 53), being able to infect several cell types such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells (including retinal cells), smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and dendritic cells (21, 37, 44, 54). Endothelial cell tropism has been regarded as a potential virulence factor that might influence the clinical course of infection (16, 55), whereas infection of leukocytes has been considered a mechanism of viral spread (17, 43, 44). Extensive propagation of HCMV laboratory strains in fibroblasts results in deletions or mutations of genes in the UL131A-128 locus (1, 18, 21, 36, 62, 63), which are associated with the loss of the ability to infect endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and leukocytes (15, 43, 55, 61). Consistent with this notion, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to UL128 or UL130 block infection of epithelial and endothelial cells but not of fibroblasts (63). Recently, it has been shown that UL128, UL130, and UL131A assemble with gH and gL to form a five-protein complex (thereafter designated gH/gL/UL128-131A) that is an alternative to the previously described gCIII complex made of gH, gL, and gO (22, 28, 48, 63).In immunocompetent individuals T-cell and antibody responses efficiently control HCMV infection and reduce pathological consequences of maternal-fetal transmission (13, 67), although this is usually not sufficient to eradicate the virus. Albeit with controversial results, HCMV immunoglobulins (Igs) have been administered to transplant patients in association with immunosuppressive treatments for prophylaxis of HCMV disease (56, 57), and a recent report suggests that they may be effective in controlling congenital infection and preventing disease in newborns (32). These products are plasma derivatives with relatively low potency in vitro (46) and have to be administered by intravenous infusion at very high doses in order to deliver sufficient amounts of neutralizing antibodies (4, 9, 32, 56, 57, 66).The whole spectrum of antigens targeted by HCMV-neutralizing antibodies remains poorly characterized. Using specific immunoabsorption to recombinant antigens and neutralization assays using fibroblasts as model target cells, it was estimated that 40 to 70% of the serum neutralizing activity is directed against gB (6). Other studies described human neutralizing antibodies specific for gB, gH, or gM/gN viral glycoproteins (6, 14, 26, 29, 34, 41, 52, 60). Remarkably, we have recently shown that human sera exhibit a more-than-100-fold-higher potency in neutralizing infection of endothelial cells than infection of fibroblasts (20). Similarly, CMV hyperimmunoglobulins have on average 48-fold-higher neutralizing activities against epithelial cell entry than against fibroblast entry (10). However, epitopes that are targeted by the antibodies that comprise epithelial or endothelial cell-specific neutralizing activity of human immune sera remain unknown.In this study we report the isolation of a large panel of human monoclonal antibodies with extraordinarily high potency in neutralizing HCMV infection of endothelial and epithelial cells and myeloid cells. With the exception of a single antibody that recognized a conserved epitope of UL128, all other antibodies recognized conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex.     

Mutations That Increase DNA Binding by the Processivity Factor of Herpes Simplex Virus Affect Virus Production and DNA Replication Fidelity

The interactions of the herpes simplex virus processivity factor UL42 with the catalytic subunit of the viral polymerase (Pol) and DNA are critical for viral DNA replication. Previous studies, including one showing that substitution of glutamine residue 282 with arginine (Q282R) results in an increase of DNA binding in vitro, have indicated that the positively charged back surface of UL42 interacts with DNA. To investigate the biological consequences of increased DNA binding by UL42 mutations, we constructed two additional UL42 mutants, including one with a double substitution of alanine for aspartic acid residues (D270A/D271A) and a triple mutant with the D270A/D271A and Q282R substitutions. These UL42 mutants exhibited increased and prolonged DNA binding without an effect on binding to a peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol. Plasmids expressing any of the three UL42 mutants with an increased positive charge on the back surface of UL42 were qualitatively competent for complementation of growth and DNA replication of a UL42 null mutant on Vero cells. We then engineered viruses expressing these mutant proteins. The UL42 mutants were more resistant to detergent extraction than wild-type UL42, suggesting that they are more tightly associated with DNA in infected cells. All three UL42 mutants formed smaller plaques on Vero cells and replicated to reduced yields compared with results for a control virus expressing wild-type UL42. Moreover, mutants with double and triple mutations, which contain D270A/D271A mutations, exhibited increased mutation frequencies, and mutants containing the Q282R mutation exhibited elevated ratios of virion DNA copies per PFU. These results suggest that herpes simplex virus has evolved so that UL42 neither binds DNA too tightly nor too weakly to optimize virus production and replication fidelity.Processivity factors of DNA polymerases promote long-chain DNA synthesis by preventing dissociation of the DNA polymerase from the primer/template. Processivity factors also can influence DNA replication fidelity, as indicated by numerous in vivo and in vitro studies (1-3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 18, 28, 36). A major class of processivity factors known as “sliding clamps” includes proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) of eukaryotic cells (23) and gp45 of T4 bacteriophage (27). Sliding clamps are homodimers or homotrimers that encircle DNA and interact with the catalytic subunits (Pols) of their cognate DNA polymerases to promote processive DNA synthesis.A second class of processivity factors includes those encoded by herpesviruses and is exemplified by herpes simplex virus (HSV) UL42. UL42 forms a heterodimer with the HSV Pol. Both subunits are essential for production of infectious virus and for viral DNA replication (20, 26). UL42 can stimulate long-chain DNA synthesis by Pol, and template challenge experiments established that this stimulation is due to increased processivity (15). In addition to its interaction with Pol, which is mediated by the C terminus of Pol, UL42 also binds DNA directly with high affinity (14, 15, 30, 37). This mode of DNA binding differs from that of sliding clamps, which do not form high-affinity direct interactions with DNA (13) but must be loaded onto DNA with the aid of ATP-dependent clamp loaders for their normal functioning (16). Nevertheless, the structure of UL42 is very similar to a monomer of the sliding clamp PCNA (39). Like other processivity factors, UL42 also plays a role in maintaining DNA replication fidelity both in vivo and in vitro (5, 18).The “back face” (opposite face to the side that binds Pol) of a UL42 molecule contains several positively charged residues. By titrating the effects of cations on UL42 DNA binding, it was determined that charge-charge interactions are involved in the interaction (22). Substitutions of alanine for any of four arginine residues on the back face of UL42 resulted in substantial reductions in DNA binding without affecting the binding to peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol in vitro (31), while substitutions of lysine for arginine had little or no effect on DNA binding affinity (22). A UL42 mutant (Q282R) containing a substitution of arginine for a negatively charged glutamine residue on the back face of UL42 exhibited a fourfold increase in DNA binding without altering the interaction with the Pol C-terminal peptide in vitro (22). Therefore, the positively charged surface of UL42 is important for the interaction between UL42 and DNA. A question raised by these studies is whether UL42 could bind DNA so tightly as to affect HSV replication.Mutant viruses engineered to encode individual arginine-to-alanine substitution mutations in UL42 exhibit several phenotypes, including a delayed onset of viral DNA replication, reduced virus yields, and reduced fidelity of DNA replication (18). Recombinant viruses expressing UL42 with multiple substitutions of alanine for arginine residues exhibit even greater effects on viral DNA replication and virus yields (19). Thus, reducing DNA binding by UL42 deleteriously affects viral growth and DNA replication fidelity. However, these studies did not address whether increasing DNA binding by UL42 would have any effects on viral DNA replication, replication fidelity, or virus production.In this study we engineered two new UL42 mutant proteins (with the D270A/D271A or Q282R/D270A/D271A mutations) that contain less negative charge on the back face and examined the effects of these substitutions on DNA and Pol peptide binding. In addition, recombinant viruses were constructed to examine the effect of these multiple substitutions and the single Q282R substitution on virus production, DNA replication, and the fidelity of DNA replication.     

The Flexible Loop of the Human Cytomegalovirus DNA Polymerase Processivity Factor ppUL44 Is Required for Efficient DNA Binding and Replication in Cells

Phosphoprotein ppUL44 of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA polymerase plays an essential role in viral replication, conferring processivity to the DNA polymerase catalytic subunit pUL54 by tethering it to the DNA. Here, for the first time, we examine in living cells the function of the highly flexible loop of ppUL44 (UL44-FL; residues 162 to 174 [PHTRVKRNVKKAP¹⁷⁴]), which has been proposed to be directly involved in ppUL44''s interaction with DNA. In particular, we use a variety of approaches in transfected cells to characterize in detail the behavior of ppUL44Δloop, a mutant derivative in which three of the five basic residues within UL44-FL are replaced by nonbasic amino acids. Our results indicate that ppUL44Δloop is functional in dimerization and binding to pUL54 but strongly impaired in binding nuclear structures within the nucleus, as shown by its inability to form nuclear speckles, reduced nuclear accumulation, and increased intranuclear mobility compared to wild-type ppUL44. Moreover, analysis of cellular fractions after detergent and DNase treatment indicates that ppUL44Δloop is strongly reduced in DNA-binding ability, in similar fashion to ppUL44-L86A/L87A, a point mutant derivative impaired in dimerization. Finally, ppUL44Δloop fails to transcomplement HCMV oriLyt-dependent DNA replication in cells and also inhibits replication in the presence of wild-type ppUL44, possibly via formation of heterodimers defective for double-stranded DNA binding. UL44-FL thus emerges for the first time as an important determinant for HCMV replication in cells, with potential implications for the development of novel antiviral approaches by targeting HCMV replication.The Betaherpesviridae subfamily member human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major human pathogen, causing serious disease in newborns following congenital infection and in immunocompromised individuals (28, 42). Replication of its double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome occurs in the nuclei of infected cells via a rolling-circle process mediated by 11 virally encoded proteins (32, 33), including a viral DNA polymerase holoenzyme, comprising a catalytic subunit, pUL54, and a proposed processivity factor, ppUL44 (14). ppUL44 is readily detectable in virus-infected cells as a 52-kDa phosphoprotein of 433 amino acids with strong dsDNA-binding ability (30, 45). Defined as a “polymerase accessory protein” (PAP) whose function is highly conserved among herpesviruses, ppUL44 is an essential factor for viral replication in cultured cells and hence represents a potential therapeutic target to combat HCMV infection (39). It is a multifunctional protein capable of self-associating (5, 10), as well as interacting with a plethora of viral and host cell proteins, including the viral kinase pUL97 (29), the viral transactivating protein pUL84 (15), the viral uracil DNA glycosylase ppUL114 (37), and the host cell importin α/β (IMPα/β) heterodimer, which is responsible for its transport into the nucleus (4). The activities of ppUL44 as a processivity factor, including the ability to dimerize, as well as bind to, pUL54 and DNA, reside in the N-terminal portion (26, 45), whereas the C terminus is essential for phosphorylation-regulated, IMPα/β-dependent nuclear targeting of ppUL44 monomers and dimers (4-6). Once within the nucleus, ppUL44 is thought to tether the DNA polymerase holoenzyme to the DNA, thus increasing its processivity (14).Recent studies have identified specific residues responsible for ppUL44 interaction with pUL54, as well as for the interaction with IMPα/β and homodimerization (4, 10, 27, 41). The crystal structure of ppUL44''s N-terminal domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) reveals striking similarity to that of other processivity factors, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and its herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) homologue UL42 (10, 46). Unlike the PCNA trimeric ring, however, both ppUL44 and UL42, which bind to dsDNA as dimers and monomers, respectively, have an open structure, which is believed to be the basis for their ability to bind to dsDNA in the absence of clamp loaders and ATP (9, 10, 46). Both ppUL44 and UL42 share a very basic “back” face, which appears to be directly involved in DNA binding via electrostatic interactions (19, 22, 23, 38, 46). One striking difference between ppUL44 and UL42 is the presence on the former of an extremely basic flexible loop (UL44-FL, PHTRVKRNVKKAP¹⁷⁴) protruding from the basic back face of the protein (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). Comparison of ppUL44 homologues from different betaherpesviruses, including human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) and 7 (HHV-7), showed that all possess similar sequences in the same position (44) (Fig. ​(Fig.1B),1B), implying functional significance.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.The highly conserved flexible loop (residues 162 to 174) within ppUL44 protrudes from ppUL44 basic face and is important for efficient nuclear accumulation and localization in nuclear speckles. (A) Schematic representation of ppUL44 N-terminal domain (residues 9 to 270, protein data bank accession no. 1T6L) generated using the Chimera software based on the published crystal structure (10, 35). Color: yellow, β-sheets; red, α-helices. Residues involved in ppUL44 dimerization (P85, L86, L87, L93, F121, and M123), as well as basic residues potentially involved in DNA binding (K21, R28, K32, K35, K128, K158, K224, and K237), are represented as spacefill in orange and green, respectively. Residues P162 and C175, in black, are indicated by arrowheads, while residues 163 to 174 are not visible in the electron density maps and could potentially extend in the cavity formed by ppUL44''s basic face to directly contact DNA. Residues forming ppUL44 connector loop (128-142) are in blue. (B) Sequence alignment between HCMVUL44-FL and the corresponding region of several betaherpesvirus ppUL44 homologues. The single-letter amino acid code is used, with basic residues in boldface. (C) COS-7 cells were transfected to express the indicated GFP fusion proteins and imaged live 16 h after transfection using CLSM and a 40× water immersion objective lens. (D) Quantitative results for the Fn/c and speckle formation for GFP-UL44 fusion proteins. The data for the Fn/c ratios represent the mean Fn/c relative to each protein indicated as a percentage of the mean Fn/c relative to GFP-UL44wt ± the standard error of the mean, with the number of analyzed cells in parentheses. (E) HEK 293 cells expressing the indicated GFP-UL44 fusion proteins were lysed, separated by PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting as described in Materials and Methods, using either the anti-GFP or the anti-α-tubulin MAbs.A recent study revealed that substitution of UL44-FL basic residues with alanine residues strongly impairs the ability of a bacterially expressed N-terminal fragment of UL44 to bind 30-bp dsDNA oligonucleotides in vitro, suggesting that UL44-FL could be involved in dsDNA-binding during viral replication (22). However, the role of UL44-FL in mediating the binding of full-length UL44 to dsDNA in cells and its role in DNA replication have not been investigated. We use here a variety of approaches to delineate the role of UL44-FL in living cells, our data revealing that UL44-FL is not required for ppUL44 dimerization or binding to the catalytic subunit pUL54 but is crucial for HCMV oriLyt-dependent DNA replication, being required for the formation of nuclear aggregates, nuclear accumulation/retention, and DNA binding of ppUL44. Importantly, ppUL44Δloop exhibits a transdominant-negative phenotype, inhibiting HCMV oriLyt-dependent DNA replication in the presence of wild-type ppUL44, possibly via formation of heterodimers defective for dsDNA binding. This underlines ppUL44-FL as an important determinant for HCMV replication in a cellular context for the first time, with potential implications for the development of novel antiviral approaches.     

The Carboxy-Terminal Segment of the Human Cytomegalovirus DNA Polymerase Accessory Subunit UL44 Is Crucial for Viral Replication

The amino-terminal 290 residues of UL44, the presumed processivity factor of human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase, possess all of the established biochemical activities of the full-length protein, while the carboxy-terminal 143 residues contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS). We found that although the amino-terminal domain was sufficient for origin-dependent synthesis in a transient-transfection assay, the carboxy-terminal segment was crucial for virus replication and for the formation of DNA replication compartments in infected cells, even when this segment was replaced with a simian virus 40 NLS that ensured nuclear localization. Our results suggest a role for this segment in viral DNA synthesis.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) encodes a DNA polymerase which is composed of two subunits, UL54, the catalytic subunit, and UL44, an accessory protein (8, 12, 21). UL44 can be divided into two regions, a 290-residue amino (N)-terminal domain and a 143-residue carboxy (C)-terminal segment. The overall fold of the N-terminal domain is markedly similar to that of processivity factors such as herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL42 and eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (6, 22, 41), which function to tether catalytic subunits to DNA to ensure long-chain DNA synthesis. In vitro, the N-terminal domain of UL44 is sufficient for all of the established biochemical activities of full-length UL44, including dimerization, binding to double-stranded DNA, interaction with UL54, and stimulation of long-chain DNA synthesis, consistent with a role as a processivity factor (4, 5, 8, 11, 23, 24, 39). In contrast, little is known about the functions of the C-terminal segment of UL44 other than its having been reported from transfection experiments to be important for downregulation of transactivation of a non-HCMV promoter (7) and to contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (3). Neither the importance of this NLS nor the role of the entire C-terminal segment has been investigated in HCMV-infected cells.We first examined whether the N-terminal domain is sufficient to support DNA synthesis from HCMV oriLyt in cells using a previously described cotransfection-replication assay (27, 28). A DpnI-resistant fragment, indicative of oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis, was detected in the presence of wild-type (WT) UL44 (pSI-UL44) (34) and in the presence of the UL44 N-terminal domain (pSI-UL44ΔC290), but not in the presence of UL44-F121A (6, 34), a mutant form previously shown not to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis (34) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). Thus, the N-terminal domain alone is sufficient to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis in a transient-transfection assay.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of UL44 C-terminal truncations in various assays. (A) HFF cells were cotransfected with the pSP50 plasmid (containing the oriLyt DNA replication origin), a plasmid expressing WT or mutant UL44 (as indicated at the top of the panel), and plasmids expressing all of the other essential HCMV DNA replication proteins. At 5 days posttransfection, total DNA was extracted and cleaved with DpnI to digest unreplicated DNA and a Southern blot assay was performed to detect replicated pSP50. An arrow indicates DpnI-resistant, newly synthesized pSP50 fragments. (B) FLAG-tagged constructs analyzed in panel C are cartooned as horizontal bars. The names of the constructs are above the bars. The lengths of the constructs in amino acids are indicated by the scale at the bottom of the panel. The positions of residues required but not necessarily sufficient for features of the constructs are designated by shading, as indicated at the bottom of the panel. (C) Vero cells were transfected with plasmids expressing WT UL44 (parts a to c), FLAG-UL44 (parts d to f), FLAG-UL44-290stop (parts g to i), or FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (parts j to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to visualize the nucleus (blue) (parts a, d, g, and j) and by IF with anti-UL44 (part b) or anti-FLAG (parts e, h, and k) and a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (green). Parts c, f, i, and l are merged from images in the left and middle columns. Magnification: ×1,000. (D) Replication kinetics of rescued viruses. Rescued derivatives of UL44 mutant viruses (UL44-290stop-R and UL44-290NLSstop-R) or WT AD169 viruses were used to infect HFF cells at an MOI of 1 PFU/cell. The supernatants from infected cells were collected every 24 h, and viral titers were determined by plaque assays on HFF cells.These results were somewhat unexpected, as the C-terminal segment contains a functional NLS identified in transfection assays (3). We therefore assayed the intracellular localization of WT and mutant UL44 following transient transfection using pcDNA3-derived expression plasmids. Since the anti-UL44 antibodies that we have tested do not recognize the N-terminal domain of UL44, we constructed UL44 genes to encode N-terminally FLAG-tagged full-length UL44 (FLAG-UL44) or a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, the latter by inserting three in-frame tandem stop codons after codon 290 (FLAG-UL44-290stop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). We also constructed a mutant form encoding a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, followed by the simian virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen NLS (15-17), followed by three tandem stop codons (FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). Vero cells were transfected with each construct using Lipofectamine 2000, fixed with 4% formaldehyde at 48 h posttransfection, and assayed by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using anti-UL44 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma). We observed mostly nuclear localization of WT UL44 or FLAG-UL44 with either diffuse or more localized intranuclear distribution (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts a to c and d to f, respectively) and some occasional perinuclear staining, which may be due to protein overexpression. In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, we observed mostly diffuse nuclear localization with little to no perinuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts j to l). In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290stop, we observed mostly cytoplasmic staining, but with some cells exhibiting some nuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts g to i), which may explain the ability of truncated UL44 to support oriLyt-dependent DNA replication in a transient-transfection assay (Fig. ​(Fig.1A1A).We next investigated whether the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for viral replication. We reasoned that we could investigate whether any requirement for this segment could be due to a requirement for an NLS by testing whether the SV40 NLS could substitute for the loss of the UL44 C terminus. We therefore constructed HCMV UL44 mutant viruses by introducing the UL44-290stop and UL44-290NLSstop mutations into a WT AD169 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) using two-step red-mediated recombination as previously described (35, 38). We also constructed the same mutants with a FLAG epitope at the N terminus of UL44 (BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop and BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop) to monitor UL44 expression, and we constructed rescued derivatives of the mutant BACs by replacing the mutated sequences with WT UL44 sequences, as described previously (35). We introduced BACs into human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells using electroporation (35, 38). In several experiments using at least two independent clones for each mutant, cells electroporated with any of the mutant BACs did not exhibit any cytopathic effect (CPE) within 21 days. In contrast, within 7 to 10 days, cells electroporated with the WT AD169 BAC, a BAC expressing WT UL44 with an N-terminal FLAG tag [AD169-BACF44 (35)], or any of the rescued derivatives began displaying a CPE and yielded infectious virus. The rescued derivatives of the nontagged mutants displayed replication kinetics similar to those of the WT virus following infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 PFU/cell (Fig. ​(Fig.1D).1D). The rescued derivatives of the FLAG-tagged mutants also replicated to WT levels (data not shown). Thus, the replication defects of the mutants were due to the introduced mutations that result in truncated UL44 either with or without the SV40 NLS. We therefore conclude that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is required for viral replication.To investigate the stage of viral replication at which the UL44 C-terminal segment is important, we first assayed the subcellular localization of immediate-early proteins IE1 and IE2 and FLAG-UL44 in cells electroporated with BAC DNA expressing the FLAG-tagged WT or the two mutant UL44s using IF at 2 days postelectroporation. IE1/IE2 could be detected diffusely distributed in nuclei of cells electroporated with all three BACs (Fig. 2b, f, and j). In cells electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, FLAG-UL44 was localized largely within the nucleus (Fig. 2c and k, respectively). In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop, the FLAG epitope was mainly localized diffusely in the cytoplasm, with only a small amount diffusely distributed in the nucleus (Fig. ​(Fig.2g).2g). These data indicate that IE proteins expressed from mutant BACs are properly localized and suggest that without its C-terminal segment, which includes the NLS identified in transfection assays (3), UL44 cannot efficiently localize to the nucleus in HCMV-infected cells. However, addition of the SV40 NLS was sufficient to efficiently localize the N-terminal domain of UL44 to the nucleus. Thus, the requirement for the C-terminal segment of UL44 for viral replication is not due solely to its NLS.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Localization of IE1/IE2 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d), BAC-UL44-290stop (panels e to h), or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels i to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and probed with anti-IE1/2 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG (Sigma). Secondary antibodies coupled to fluorophores were used for visualization of IE1/2 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b, f, and j) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c, g, and k) antibodies. DAPI was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a, e, and i). Panels d, h, and l are merged images of the panels in the other columns. Magnification: ×1,000.We next investigated if the block in viral replication due to the loss of the C-terminal segment could be attributed to a defect in viral DNA synthesis. Cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and viral DNA accumulation was assayed by quantitative real-time PCR at various times postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3)3) as previously described (32, 35). In HFFs electroporated with AD169-BACF44, viral DNA began to accumulate above the input levels by 8 days postelectroporation and increased over time, with as much as a 350-fold increase over the input DNA level by 18 days postelectroporation. In contrast, levels of viral DNA in cells electroporated with BAC-UL44-290NLSstop did not increase above input levels, even by 18 days postelectroporation. These data are consistent with the notion that the UL44 C-terminal segment is required for viral DNA synthesis, although we caution that the assay did not detect DNA synthesis from AD169-BACF44 until day 8, when viral spread had likely occurred (see below).Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Quantification of viral DNA accumulation in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and total DNA was harvested on the days postelectroporation indicated. Viral DNA accumulation was assessed by real-time PCR by assessing levels of the UL83 gene and normalizing to levels of the cellular β-actin gene (32). The data are presented as the fold increase in normalized viral DNA levels over the amount of input DNA (day 1).We also analyzed the localization patterns of UL44 and UL57, the viral single-stranded DNA binding protein, which is a marker for viral DNA replication compartments (1, 2, 18, 26, 29). At 8 days postelectroporation with AD169-BACF44, UL57 and FLAG-UL44 largely colocalized within a single large intranuclear structure that likely represents a fully formed replication compartment, with some cells containing multiple smaller globular structures within the nucleus that likely represent earlier stages of replication compartments (1, 2, 29) (Fig. 4a to d). Neighboring cells also stained for UL57 and FLAG-UL44, indicative of viral spread. In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, UL57 (Fig. ​(Fig.4f)4f) was found in either punctate or small globular structures. This pattern of UL57 staining resembled that observed at very early stages of viral DNA synthesis in HCMV-infected cells, but the structures were larger and less numerous than those observed in HCMV-infected cells in the presence of a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor (2, 29). Staining for FLAG-UL44 was nuclear and largely diffuse, with some areas of more concentrated staining (Fig. ​(Fig.4g),4g), which could also be observed in some cells at day 2 postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3k).3k). This pattern of UL44 localization was generally similar to that observed in HCMV-infected cells at very early stages of infection or when HCMV DNA synthesis is blocked and also similar to the pattern in cells transfected with a UL84 null mutant BAC (2, 29, 33, 40). Importantly, little colocalization of UL57 and UL44 was observed, with areas of concentration of UL57 or UL44 occupying separate regions in the nuclei of these cells (Fig. ​(Fig.4h).4h). We are unaware of any other examples of this pattern of localization of these proteins in HCMV-infected cells and suggest that it may be a result of the loss of the UL44 C-terminal segment. These results indicate that this segment is important for efficient formation of viral DNA replication compartments, again consistent with a requirement for this portion of UL44 for viral DNA synthesis.Open in a separate windowFIG. 4.Localization of UL57 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d) or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels e to h). At 8 days posttransfection, cells were fixed and then stained with antibodies specific for UL57 (Virusys) or FLAG (Sigma), followed by a secondary antibody coupled to fluorophores to detect UL57 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b and f) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c and g) antibodies. DAPI stain was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a and e). Panels d and h are merged images of the panels in the other columns. White arrows identify punctate UL57 staining. Yellow arrows identify areas of concentration of FLAG-UL44 staining. Magnification: ×1,000.Our results, taken together, argue for a role for the C-terminal segment of UL44 in HCMV-infected cells in efficient nuclear localization of UL44 and a role in viral DNA synthesis beyond its role in nuclear localization. It is possible that this segment interacts with host or viral proteins involved in DNA replication. Of the various proteins reported to interact with UL44 (10, 19, 30, 31, 35-37), interesting candidates include the host protein nucleolin, which has been shown to associate with UL44 and be important for viral DNA synthesis (35), and the viral UL112-113 proteins, which in transfection assays were shown to recruit UL44 to early sites of DNA replication (2, 29, 33). After this paper was submitted, Kim and Ahn reported that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for interaction with a UL112-113 protein and, similar to our findings, crucial for viral replication (19). However, contrary to our findings, they reported that this segment was not necessary for efficient nuclear localization of UL44 (19). It may well be that the C-terminal segment of UL44 also has some other role later in viral replication, perhaps in gene expression, as has been suggested (7, 13, 14).A virus with a deletion of the C-terminal 150 amino acids of the HSV-1 polymerase accessory subunit UL42 displays no obvious defect in replication (9). Thus, it appears that HSV-1 and HCMV exhibit different requirements for the C-terminal segments of their respective accessory proteins. This and many other differences between these functionally and structurally orthologous proteins (5, 6, 20, 24, 25) suggest considerable selection for different features during evolution.     

Structure and Capsid Association of the Herpesvirus Large Tegument Protein UL36

The tegument of all herpesviruses contains a high-molecular-weight protein homologous to herpes simplex virus (HSV) UL36. This large (3,164 amino acids), essential, and multifunctional polypeptide is located on the capsid surface and present at 100 to 150 copies per virion. We have been testing the idea that UL36 is important for the structural organization of the tegument. UL36 is proposed to bind directly to the capsid with other tegument proteins bound indirectly by way of UL36. Here we report the results of studies carried out with HSV type 1-derived structures containing the capsid but lacking a membrane and depleted of all tegument proteins except UL36 and a second high-molecular-weight protein, UL37. Electron microscopic analysis demonstrated that, compared to capsids lacking a tegument, these capsids (called T36 capsids) had tufts of protein located at the vertices. Projecting from the tufts were thin, variably curved strands with lengths (15 to 70 nm) in some cases sufficient to extend across the entire thickness of the tegument (∼50 nm). Strands were sensitive to removal from the capsid by brief sonication, which also removed UL36 and UL37. The findings are interpreted to indicate that UL36 and UL37 are the components of the tufts and of the thin strands that extend from them. The strand lengths support the view that they could serve as organizing features for the tegument, as they have the potential to reach all parts of the tegument. The variably curved structure of the strands suggests they may be flexible, a property that could contribute to the deformable nature of the tegument.All herpesviruses have a tegument, a layer of protein located between the virus capsid and membrane. The tegument accounts for a substantial proportion of the overall virus structure. Its thickness (30 to 50 nm), for example, may be comparable to the capsid radius, and tegument proteins can account for 40% or more of the total virion protein. Herpesvirus tegument proteins are thought to function promptly after initiation of infection, before expression of virus genes can take place (11, 13, 14, 21, 33, 37).Electron microscopic analysis of virions has demonstrated that the tegument is not highly structured (9, 22). It does not have icosahedral symmetry like the capsid, and it may be uniformly or asymmetrically arranged around the capsid (26). Tegument structure is described as fibrous or granular, and its morphology is found to change as the virus matures. Studies with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), for example, indicate that the tegument structure is altered in cell-associated compared to extracellular virus (26).The tegument has been most thoroughly studied in HSV-1, where biochemical analyses indicate that it is composed of approximately 20 distinct, virus-encoded protein species. The predominant components are the products of the genes UL47, UL48, and UL49, with each protein present in 800 or more copies per virion (12, 40). Other tegument proteins can occur in 100 or fewer copies, and trace amounts of cell-encoded proteins are also present (17). Tegument proteins are classified as inner or outer components based on their association with the capsid after it enters the host cell cytoplasm. The inner tegument proteins (UL36, UL37, and US3) are those that remain bound to the capsid after entry, while the others (the outer tegument proteins) become detached (7, 18).The HSV-1 UL36 protein has the potential to play a central role in organizing the overall structure of the tegument. With a length of 3,164 amino acids, UL36 could span the thickness of the tegument multiple times. One hundred to 150 UL36 molecules are present in the tegument (12), and they are bound to the capsid by way of an essential C-terminal domain (2, 16). UL36 is able to bind the major tegument components by way of documented direct (UL37 and UL48) and indirect (UL46, UL47, and UL49) contacts (6, 15, 24, 38).Here we describe the results of studies designed to test the idea that UL36 serves to organize the tegument structure. Beginning with infectious virus, a novel method has been used to isolate capsids that contain UL36 and UL37 but lack the virus membrane and are depleted of all other tegument proteins. These capsids (T36 capsids) were examined by electron microscopy to clarify the structure of UL36 and UL37 molecules and their location on the capsid surface.     

Interaction Domains of the UL16 and UL21 Tegument Proteins of Herpes Simplex Virus

The UL16 protein of herpes simplex virus is capsid associated and was previously identified as a binding partner of the membrane-associated UL11 tegument protein (J. S. Loomis, R. J. Courtney, and J. W. Wills, J. Virol. 77:11417-11424, 2003). In those studies, a less-prominent, ∼65-kDa binding partner of unknown identity was also observed. Mass spectrometry studies have now revealed this species to be UL21, a tegument protein that has been implicated in the transport of capsids in the cytoplasm. The validity of the mass spectrometry results was tested in a variety of coimmunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down experiments. The data revealed that UL21 and UL16 can form a complex in the absence of other viral proteins, even when the assays used proteins purified from Escherichia coli. Moreover, UL11 was able to pull down UL21 only when UL16 was present, suggesting that all three proteins can form a complex. Deletion analyses revealed that the second half of UL21 (residues 268 to 535) is sufficient for the UL16 interaction and packaging into virions; however, attempts to map a subdomain of UL16 were largely unsuccessful, with only the first 40 (of 373) residues being found to be dispensable. Nevertheless, it is clear that UL16 must have two distinct binding sites, because covalent modification of its free cysteines with N-ethylmaleimide blocked binding to UL11 but not UL21. These findings should prove useful for elucidating the molecular machinery used to transmit a signal into a virion when it attaches to cells, a recently discovered mechanism in which UL16 is a central player.Herpes simplex virus (HSV) contains more than 40 different virally encoded proteins that are found in three distinct layers: the capsid containing the viral DNA, the host-derived lipid envelope with embedded glycoproteins, and the tegument, an assortment of proteins located between the nucleocapsid and the envelope (22). While these regions are often discussed as separate structures, there is now clear evidence that the virion as a whole is a machine with interconnected parts that quickly rearrange on the inside in response to glycoprotein-binding events on the outside. Specifically, tegument protein UL16 is triggered to be released from the capsid when HSV attaches to host cells prior to membrane fusion, and the signal responsible for this can be sent in a cell-free manner by binding virions to immobilized heparin (21). It appears that glycoprotein C is involved in transmitting the signal (at least in a cell-free system), but all the other molecular “cogs” that drive this part of the HSV machine are unknown. To identify these components, we have been investigating UL16 and the network of molecular interactions in which it participates.Our interest in UL16 began when we identified it as a binding partner of UL11 (17), a small tegument protein (only 96 amino acids) that is conserved among all herpesviruses. UL11 is peripherally bound to membranes via two fatty acids, myristate and palmitate (16), and trafficks through lipid raft domains (6, 12). It accumulates at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where virus budding takes place (16, 30), and mutants that lack UL11 are defective for the production of virions, resulting in an increased number of unenveloped capsids in the cytoplasm (5, 9, 19). The UL11-UL16 interaction has since been confirmed by other groups (15, 37), and more recently, we have found that the interaction is direct and requires free cysteines present within UL16 (41). That is, chemical modification of free cysteines in UL16 with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) blocks the interaction with UL11. On the UL11 side of the interaction, LI and acidic cluster motifs are needed for binding (17, 41).UL16 is a 373-amino-acid protein that is also conserved among herpesviruses and exhibits dynamic capsid-binding properties. Although it is found in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the infected cell, it is only stably associated with capsids isolated from the cytoplasm (20, 24, 26). This finding, combined with the ability of UL11 to accumulate at the site of budding, led us to hypothesize that the UL11-UL16 interaction provides a bridging function to assist the capsid in acquiring its envelope (17). However, sometime after budding—as the virus egresses from the cell—the interaction of UL16 with the capsid is destabilized (20). And, as mentioned earlier, binding of the virion to its attachment receptors on the host cell surface (heparan sulfate) further disrupts the association of UL16 with the capsid (21). Free cysteines appear to play a critical role in this outside-in signaling event, because treatment of extracellular virions with NEM prior to cell binding prevents the release of UL16 from the capsid (21).While UL16 was the most abundant protein pulled out of infected cell lysates in our search for UL11 binding partners, a much less prominent, but highly reproducible, ∼65-kDa species was also observed (17). Like UL16, this unknown protein was absent when either the LI or acidic cluster motifs were eliminated from the glutathione S-transferase (GST)-UL11 construct used in the experiment. This suggested that the unknown protein was obtained by either (i) competing with UL16 for binding to the same motifs within UL11 or (ii) binding to UL11 indirectly through an interaction with UL16. Because the LI and acidic cluster motifs of UL11 are recognized by host proteins for trafficking through lipid rafts (6, 16), the first hypothesis seemed likely; however, because UL16 participates in a complex signaling pathway within the virion, it was possible that the unknown protein would be a virus-encoded component. The purpose of the experiments described in this report was to identify this unknown protein and to determine how it fits into the UL16 network of interactions.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Conserved Residues in the UL24 Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Are Important for Dispersal of the Nucleolar Protein Nucleolin

The UL24 family of proteins is widely conserved among herpesviruses. We demonstrated previously that UL24 of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is important for the dispersal of nucleolin from nucleolar foci throughout the nuclei of infected cells. Furthermore, the N-terminal portion of UL24 localizes to nuclei and can disperse nucleolin in the absence of any other viral proteins. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that highly conserved residues in UL24 are important for the ability of the protein to modify the nuclear distribution of nucleolin. We constructed a panel of substitution mutations in UL24 and tested their effects on nucleolin staining patterns. We found that modified UL24 proteins exhibited a range of subcellular distributions. Mutations associated with a wild-type localization pattern for UL24 correlated with high levels of nucleolin dispersal. Interestingly, mutations targeting two regions, namely, within the first homology domain and overlapping or near the previously identified PD-(D/E)XK endonuclease motif, caused the most altered UL24 localization pattern and the most drastic reduction in its ability to disperse nucleolin. Viral mutants corresponding to the substitutions G121A and E99A/K101A both exhibited a syncytial plaque phenotype at 39°C. vUL24-E99A/K101A replicated to lower titers than did vUL24-G121A or KOS. Furthermore, the E99A/K101A mutation caused the greatest impairment of HSV-1-induced dispersal of nucleolin. Our results identified residues in UL24 that are critical for the ability of UL24 to alter nucleoli and further support the notion that the endonuclease motif is important for the function of UL24 during infection.The UL24 protein is conserved throughout the Herpesviridae family, and to the best of our knowledge, a UL24 homolog has been identified in all Herpesvirales genomes sequenced to date with the exception of the channel catfish virus (9, 10, 19). UL24 of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is required for efficient virus replication both in vitro and in vivo and for reactivation from latency in a mouse model of ocular infection (18). UL24 is one of the few HSV-1 genes, along with gB, gK, and UL20, in which mutations have been identified that cause the formation of syncytial plaques (2, 7, 34, 36, 39). The UL24-associated syncytial phenotype is only partially penetrant at 37°C but is fully penetrant at 39°C. Indications are that gK and UL20 have an inhibitory effect on the formation of syncytia (1), while certain mutations in gB entrain an uncontrolled fusogenic activity (11, 13, 15).UL24 is a highly basic protein of 269 amino acids that is expressed with leaky-late kinetics (31). Five homology domains (HDs), which consist of stretches of amino acids with a high percentage of identity between homologs, are present in the UL24 open reading frame (ORF) (19). In addition, a PD-(D/E)XK endonuclease motif has been identified that falls within the HDs (20); however, a role for this motif has yet to be demonstrated. In infected cells, UL24 is detected in the nucleus and the cytoplasm and transiently localizes to nucleoli (23). In the absence of other viral proteins, UL24 accumulates in the Golgi apparatus and in the nucleus, where it usually exhibits a diffuse staining pattern, but in a minority of cells it is detected in nucleoli (3).During infection, the formation of the viral replication compartments in the nucleus and the action of several viral proteins result in a remodeling of the nucleus. Chromatin is marginalized (29, 40), promyelocytic leukemia bodies are dispersed (26, 27), and the nuclear lamina is disrupted (33, 37). HSV-1 infection also affects the nucleolus, a prominent nuclear substructure implicated in the synthesis of rRNA, cell cycle regulation, and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling (5). Nucleoli become elongated following infection, and the synthesis of mature rRNA is reduced (4, 38, 42). Several HSV-1 proteins have been shown to localize to, or associate with, the nucleolus (12). The viral protein VP22 associates with the nucleolus and with dispersed nucleolin in HSV-1-infected cells (22), and RL1, US11, and ICP0 have also been shown to localize to nucleoli (24, 30, 35). Previously we showed that nucleolin is dispersed throughout the nucleus upon HSV-1 infection and that UL24 is involved in this nuclear modification (23). We further found that the N-terminal portion of UL24 is sufficient to induce the redistribution of nucleolin in the absence of other viral proteins (3).In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that the endonuclease motif, which is made up of some of the most highly conserved residues in UL24, is important for the dispersal of nucleolin. A panel of substitution mutations in UL24 was generated, and the impact on the function of UL24 was assessed.     

Inactivation and Disassembly of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Is Associated with Degradation of the APC5 and APC4 Subunits and Does Not Require UL97-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdh1

Infection of quiescent cells by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) elicits severe cell cycle deregulation, resulting in a G₁/S arrest, which can be partly attributed to the inactivation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). As we previously reported, the premature phosphorylation of its coactivator Cdh1 and/or the dissociation of the core complex can account for the inactivation. We have expanded on these results and further delineated the key components required for disabling the APC during HCMV infection. The viral protein kinase UL97 was hypothesized to phosphorylate Cdh1, and consistent with this, phosphatase assays utilizing a virus with a UL97 deletion mutation (ΔUL97 virus) indicated that Cdh1 is hypophosphorylated at early times in the infection. Mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated that UL97 can phosphorylate Cdh1 in vitro, and the majority of the sites identified correlated with previously characterized cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) consensus sites. Analysis of the APC core complex during ΔUL97 virus infection showed APC dissociation occurring at the same time as during infection with wild-type virus, suggesting that the UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this to occur. Further investigation of the APC subunits showed a proteasome-dependent loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits that was temporally associated with the disassembly of the APC. Immediate early viral gene expression was not sufficient for the degradation of APC4 and APC5, indicating that a viral early gene product(s), possibly in association with a de novo-synthesized cellular protein(s), is involved.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a highly prevalent β-herpesvirus, can cause serious birth defects and disease in immunocompromised individuals, and it may be associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease (53). Viral gene expression is temporally regulated and is dependent on many cellular factors for a productive infection. Immediate early (IE) genes are expressed by 2 h postinfection (p.i.) and transactivate the early genes required for viral DNA replication. The expression of the late genes, which encode proteins involved in virion maturation and egress, is dependent on viral DNA replication.The virus has adopted different strategies for altering the cellular environment to make it more conducive to productive infection, including the stimulation of host cell DNA replication pathways, cell cycle deregulation and arrest, immune evasion, and inhibition of apoptosis (53). Although HCMV encodes its own DNA polymerase, it is dependent on other cellular resources for DNA replication. Infection of quiescent cells induces passage toward S phase such that the host cell is stimulated to generate proteins and DNA precursors necessary for genome replication; however, entry into S phase and cellular DNA replication are subsequently blocked and the cell arrests in G₁/S (1, 10, 11, 14, 30, 45). Cellular resources are thereby presumably free to be efficiently utilized for viral replication. Cell cycle arrest by HCMV is achieved in part through the misregulation of several cell cycle proteins, including the phosphorylation and accumulation of the Rb family pocket proteins, upregulation of cyclins E and B and their associated kinase activities, inhibition of cyclin A expression, stabilization of p53, and accumulation of Cdc6 and geminin, which inhibits licensing of the cellular origins of DNA replication (8, 17, 30, 49, 54, 65). Some of these cell cycle defects can be attributed to a deregulation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) (8, 72, 79, 80), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is responsible for the timely degradation of cell cycle proteins and mitotic cyclins to promote cycle progression from mitosis through G₁ to S phase (58, 74). As the APC also appears to be a common target among other viruses, including the chicken anemia virus, adenoviruses, and poxviruses (23, 36, 52, 70), understanding the mechanisms leading to its inactivation during viral infection has been of great interest.As we have previously reported, multiple mechanisms may be involved in disabling the APC during HCMV infection (72), which is not surprising given the complexity of its structure and regulation (for a review, see references 58 and 74). The APC is a large multisubunit complex consisting of at least 11 conserved core subunits, as well as other species-specific subunits. In metazoans, the APC2 and APC11 subunits form the catalytic core, and along with APC10, provide the platform for binding the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Each of the APC3, APC8, APC6, and APC7 subunits contain multiple copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif and together make up the TPR subcomplex, which provides a platform of protein interaction surfaces for binding the coactivators (i.e., Cdh1 and Cdc20) and various substrates. These two subcomplexes are bridged by the large scaffolding subunit APC1, with the TPR subcomplex tethered to APC1 through APC4 and APC5. The binding between APC1, APC4, APC5, and APC8 is also interdependent, such that the loss of one subunit decreases the association of the other three (71).The APC is activated by either of its coactivators, Cdh1 or Cdc20, which also function in recruiting specific substrates to the APC during different phases of the cell cycle. The phosphorylation of several APC subunits at the onset of mitosis, including APC1 and the TPR subunits, by cyclin B/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and Plk1 allows the binding of Cdc20 and subsequent activation of the APC (APC^Cdc20) (19, 37), whereas the binding and activation of the complex by Cdh1 is inhibited through its phosphorylation by cyclin B/Cdk1 (9, 29, 38, 83). As cells pass the spindle assembly checkpoint, APC^Cdc20 ubiquitinates securin (to allow for sister chromatid separation) and cyclin B for degradation by the proteasome (42, 67). The subsequent inactivation of Cdk1 and activation of mitotic phosphatases during late anaphase relieves the inhibitory phosphorylation on Cdh1, presumably by Cdc14 (6, 38, 44), which then allows Cdh1 to bind and activate the APC (APC^Cdh1). APC^Cdh1 ubiquitinates Cdc20 and mitotic cyclins for degradation to facilitate mitotic exit and maintains their low levels, along with S-phase regulators (e.g., Cdc6, geminin, etc.), during G₁ (16, 50, 59, 63). The inactivation of APC^Cdh1 as cells enter S phase may be mediated in part through the phosphorylation of Cdh1 by cyclin A/Cdk2 (46) and Cdh1 binding to the inhibitor Emi1 (25). The inactivation of Cdh1 by phosphorylation has been shown in all organisms studied thus far (e.g., yeast, Drosophila, plants, mammals, etc.), and mutants mimicking constitutively phosphorylated Cdh1 on Cdk consensus sites can neither bind nor activate the APC in vivo or in vitro (9, 29, 38, 69, 83).During HCMV infection of fibroblasts in G₀/G₁, however, Cdh1 becomes prematurely phosphorylated in a Cdk-independent manner and no longer associates with the APC (72). This dissociation does not appear to be due to an overexpression of Emi1 (79). Cdc20 also can no longer associate with the APC (79), suggesting a defect in the APC core. We have further shown that the APC core complex disassembles during the infection, with the TPR subunits (i.e., APC3, APC7, and APC8) and APC10 localizing to the cytosol, while APC1 remains nuclear (72). Interestingly, both the phosphorylation of Cdh1 and the dissociation of the APC occur at similar times during HCMV infection. Although either of these mechanisms could render the APC inactive, it was unclear whether these processes are linked or represent independent (or redundant) pathways. The causative factor(s) in mediating these events and the question of whether such a factor(s) was of cellular or viral origin also remained unresolved.On the basis of the results of several recent studies (26, 32, 62), the viral protein kinase UL97 emerged as a likely candidate for involvement in the phosphorylation of Cdh1. Conserved among herpesviruses, UL97 functions in viral genome replication (7, 32, 81) and in nuclear egress of viral capsids (21, 39, 48). UL97 is present in the tegument of the virus particle (76) and is also expressed de novo with early kinetics (i.e., detectable by 5 h p.i. by Western blot assay), with increased expression at later times of the infection (51, 76, 77). UL97 is a serine/threonine (S/T) protein kinase (22), and recent studies have further characterized it as a Cdkl mimic, with predicted structural similarity to Cdk2 (64) and common substrates. UL97 has been shown to phosphorylate in vitro nuclear lamin A/C (21), the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (5), the translation elongation factor 1δ (EF1δ) (33), and Rb (26, 62) on sites targeted by Cdks, and there is considerable evidence that UL97 phosphorylates lamin A/C, EF1δ, and Rb on these sites in infected cells as well (21, 26, 33, 62). Given that cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin B/Cdk1 complexes normally phosphorylate Cdh1, thus preventing its association with the APC, we hypothesized that UL97 phosphorylates Cdh1 during HCMV infection.In the present study, we provide further mechanistic details of the events and players involved in inactivating the APC during HCMV infection. Evidence that UL97 is the viral factor mediating the phosphorylation of Cdh1 was obtained. However, APC disassembly still occurred at similar times in ΔUL97 and wild-type virus infections, indicating that UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this event. The inactivation of the APC core complex is further attributed to the loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits early during the infection. The degradation of these subunits is proteasome dependent and requires de novo synthesis of viral early or cellular proteins. While the primary mechanism of inactivation appears to be the dissociation of the complex and the targeted loss of APC5 and APC4, phosphorylation of Cdh1 may provide a small kinetic advantage and backup mechanism for disabling the APC.     

Processing of Lagging-Strand Intermediates In Vitro by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Polymerase

The processing of lagging-strand intermediates has not been demonstrated in vitro for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Human flap endonuclease-1 (Fen-1) was examined for its ability to produce ligatable products with model lagging-strand intermediates in the presence of the wild-type or exonuclease-deficient (exo⁻) HSV-1 DNA polymerase (pol). Primer/templates were composed of a minicircle single-stranded DNA template annealed to primers that contained 5′ DNA flaps or 5′ annealed DNA or RNA sequences. Gapped DNA primer/templates were extended but not significantly strand displaced by the wild-type HSV-1 pol, although significant strand displacement was observed with exo⁻ HSV-1 pol. Nevertheless, the incubation of primer/templates containing 5′ flaps with either wild-type or exo⁻ HSV-1 pol and Fen-1 led to the efficient production of nicks that could be sealed with DNA ligase I. Both polymerases stimulated the nick translation activity of Fen-1 on DNA- or RNA-containing primer/templates, indicating that the activities were coordinated. Further evidence for Fen-1 involvement in HSV-1 DNA synthesis is suggested by the ability of a transiently expressed green fluorescent protein fusion with Fen-1 to accumulate in viral DNA replication compartments in infected cells and by the ability of endogenous Fen-1 to coimmunoprecipitate with an essential viral DNA replication protein in HSV-1-infected cells.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the prototypic member of the family of Herpesviridae and that of the alphaherpesviridae subfamily, has served as the model for understanding the replication of herpesvirus genomes during lytic virus replication (29). The 152-kbp genome of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) possesses approximately 85 genes, 7 of which have been shown to be necessary and sufficient for viral DNA replication within host cells (reviewed in references 5 and 38). These seven genes encode a DNA polymerase (pol) and its processivity factor (UL42), a heterotrimeric complex containing a DNA helicase (UL5), primase (UL52), and noncatalytic accessory protein (UL8), a single-stranded DNA binding protein (infected cell protein 8 [ICP-8]), and an origin binding protein with DNA helicase activity (UL9). There is strong evidence in support of the circularization of the linear virion DNA shortly after entry, and DNA replication then is thought to initiate at one or more of the three redundant origins of replication (29, 38). At least in the earliest stages of viral DNA replication, UL9 protein is required, presumably to bind to and unwind the DNA and to attract the other DNA replication proteins (29, 38). The electron microscopic examination of pulse-labeled replicating HSV-1 DNA indicates the presence of lariats, eye-forms, and D-forms (21), which is consistent with bidirectional theta-like replication from origins. To date, however, no biochemical assay has demonstrated origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro. However, in the absence of UL9, the other six HSV DNA replication proteins can support initiation and replication from a circular single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) template in an origin-independent fashion (15, 26), resembling the rolling-circle mode of replication thought to occur during the later stages of viral replication.Although nicks and small gaps have been observed in isolated replicating and virion DNA (38), the evidence for bidirectional duplex synthesis, the rapid rate of viral DNA replication, and the absence of long stretches of ssDNA in replicating and mature DNA isolated from HSV-1-infected cells suggest that leading- and lagging-strand synthesis are closely coordinated in vivo. Falkenberg et al. (15) used a minicircle DNA template with a strand bias and the six essential HSV-1 DNA replication proteins needed for rolling circle replication to demonstrate lagging-strand synthesis in vitro. However, replication from the parental strand template (leading-strand synthesis) was more efficient than synthesis from the complementary-strand template (lagging-strand synthesis). These results suggest the possibility that one or more host functions required for efficient lagging-strand synthesis or for its close coordination with leading-strand synthesis is missing in such in vitro systems.Although leading- and lagging-strand syntheses share many of the same requirements for bulk DNA synthesis, lagging-strand synthesis is a more complex process. Because the direction of polymerization of lagging-strand intermediates is opposite the direction of replication fork movement, lagging-strand synthesis requires that priming and extension occur many times to produce discontinuous segments called Okazaki fragments (reviewed in reference 25). Okazaki fragments need to be processed to remove the RNA primer, to fill in the area previously occupied by the RNA, and to seal the remaining nick between fragments, all of which must occur efficiently, accurately, and completely. Failure to do so would result in the accumulation of DNA breaks, multiple mutations, delayed DNA replication, and/or cell death (16, 61).In eukaryotes, what is currently known regarding the process of lagging-strand synthesis is based on genetic and biochemical studies with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on in vitro reconstitution studies to define the mammalian enzymes required for simian virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen-dependent DNA replication (17, 37, 44, 57, 58). These studies have revealed that the extension of a newly synthesized Okazaki fragment DNA with pol δ causes the strand displacement of the preceding fragment to produce a 5′ flap (25). Results suggest that flap endonuclease 1 (Fen-1) is the activity responsible for the removal of the bulk of the 5′ flaps generated (1, 44, 48), although dna2 protein may facilitate the removal of longer flaps coated with the ssDNA binding protein complex (2, 44). In addition, the overexpression of exonuclease I can partially compensate for the loss of Fen-1 function in yeast (24, 51). For the proper processing of lagging-strand intermediates, the entire 5′ flap and all of the RNA primer need to be removed, and the gap must be filled to achieve a ligatable nick. DNA ligase I has been shown to be the enzyme involved in sealing Okazaki fragments in yeast and in humans (3, 31, 50, 56, 57). DNA ligase I requires a nick in which there is a 5′ phosphate on one end and a 3′ hydroxyl linked to a deoxyribose sugar entity on the other, and it works poorly in the presence of mismatches (54). The close coordination of Fen-1 and DNA ligase I activities for Okazaki fragment processing is facilitated by the interactions of these proteins with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the processivity factor for pol δ and ɛ (6, 30, 32, 46, 52, 53).HSV-1 does not appear to encode a protein with DNA ligase activity or one that can specifically cleave 5′ flaps, although it does encode a 5′-to-3′ exonuclease activity (UL12 [10, 20]) and a 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity that is part of the HSV-1 pol catalytic subunit (27). As for most eukaryotes, RNA primers are essential for HSV-1 DNA synthesis, as demonstrated by the presence of oligoribonucleotides in replicating DNA in vivo (4), by the well-characterized ability of the UL52 protein in complex with the UL5 helicase activity to synthesize oligoribonucleotide primers on ssDNA in vitro (11, 13), and by the requirement of the conserved catalytic residues in the UL52 primase in vitro and in HSV-1-infected cells (14, 26). It is the strand displacement activity of pol δ that produces the 5′ flaps that are key to the removal of RNA primers during Okazaki fragment processing (6, 25). However, we previously demonstrated that wild-type HSV-1 DNA polymerase possesses poor strand displacement activity (62), in contrast to mammalian DNA pol δ (25). Thus, it is not apparent how RNA primers would be removed when encountered by HSV-1 pol during HSV-1 lagging-strand synthesis or how such intermediates would be processed.We wished to test the hypothesis that the nick translation activity of mammalian Fen-1 could function in collaboration with HSV-1 pol to facilitate the proper removal of RNA primers and/or short flaps to produce the ligatable products required for Okazaki fragment processing. In this report, we have examined the ability of wild-type and exonuclease-deficient (exo⁻) HSV-1 pol, which differ in their respective strand displacement activities, to extend model lagging-strand substrates in the presence or absence of mammalian Fen-1. Our results demonstrate that both wild-type and exo⁻ HSV-1 pol can cooperate with and enhance Fen-1 activity to achieve a ligatable nick in vitro. Moreover, colocalization and coimmunoprecipitation studies reveal a physical association of Fen-1 with HSV-1 DNA replication proteins, supporting a model for the involvement of Fen-1 in HSV-1 DNA replication.