Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viremia and Provirus in Resting CD4+ T Cells Reveals a Novel Source of Residual Viremia in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can reduce human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia to clinically undetectable levels. Despite this dramatic reduction, some virus is present in the blood. In addition, a long-lived latent reservoir for HIV-1 exists in resting memory CD4⁺ T cells. This reservoir is believed to be a source of the residual viremia and is the focus of eradication efforts. Here, we use two measures of population structure—analysis of molecular variance and the Slatkin-Maddison test—to demonstrate that the residual viremia is genetically distinct from proviruses in resting CD4⁺ T cells but that proviruses in resting and activated CD4⁺ T cells belong to a single population. Residual viremia is genetically distinct from proviruses in activated CD4⁺ T cells, monocytes, and unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The finding that some of the residual viremia in patients on HAART stems from an unidentified cellular source other than CD4⁺ T cells has implications for eradication efforts.Successful treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) reduces free virus in the blood to levels undetectable by the most sensitive clinical assays (18, 36). However, HIV-1 persists as a latent provirus in resting, memory CD4⁺ T lymphocytes (6, 9, 12, 16, 48) and perhaps in other cell types (45, 52). The latent reservoir in resting CD4⁺ T cells represents a barrier to eradication because of its long half-life (15, 37, 40-42) and because specifically targeting and purging this reservoir is inherently difficult (8, 25, 27).In addition to the latent reservoir in resting CD4⁺ T cells, patients on HAART also have a low amount of free virus in the plasma, typically at levels below the limit of detection of current clinical assays (13, 19, 35, 37). Because free virus has a short half-life (20, 47), residual viremia is indicative of active virus production. The continued presence of free virus in the plasma of patients on HAART indicates either ongoing replication (10, 13, 17, 19), release of virus after reactivation of latently infected CD4⁺ T cells (22, 24, 31, 50), release from other cellular reservoirs (7, 45, 52), or some combination of these mechanisms. Finding the cellular source of residual viremia is important because it will identify the cells that are still capable of producing virus in patients on HAART, cells that must be targeted in any eradication effort.Detailed analysis of this residual viremia has been hindered by technical challenges involved in working with very low concentrations of virus (13, 19, 35). Recently, new insights into the nature of residual viremia have been obtained through intensive patient sampling and enhanced ultrasensitive sequencing methods (1). In a subset of patients, most of the residual viremia consisted of a small number of viral clones (1, 46) produced by a cell type severely underrepresented in the peripheral circulation (1). These unique viral clones, termed predominant plasma clones (PPCs), persist unchanged for extended periods of time (1). The persistence of PPCs indicates that in some patients there may be another major cellular source of residual viremia (1). However, PPCs were observed in a small group of patients who started HAART with very low CD4 counts, and it has been unclear whether the PPC phenomenon extends beyond this group of patients. More importantly, it has been unclear whether the residual viremia generally consists of distinct virus populations produced by different cell types.Since the HIV-1 infection in most patients is initially established by a single viral clone (23, 51), with subsequent diversification (29), the presence of genetically distinct populations of virus in a single individual can reflect entry of viruses into compartments where replication occurs with limited subsequent intercompartmental mixing (32). Sophisticated genetic tests can detect such population structure in a sample of viral sequences (4, 39, 49). Using two complementary tests of population structure (14, 43), we analyzed viral sequences from multiple sources within individual patients in order to determine whether a source other than circulating resting CD4⁺ T cells contributes to residual viremia and viral persistence. Our results have important clinical implications for understanding HIV-1 persistence and treatment failure and for improving eradication strategies, which are currently focusing only on the latent CD4⁺ T-cell reservoir.     

Selective Expression of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nef in Specific Immune Cell Populations of Transgenic Mice Is Associated with Distinct AIDS-Like Phenotypes

We previously reported that CD4C/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)^Nef transgenic (Tg) mice, expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells and cells of the macrophage/dendritic cell (DC) lineage, develop a severe AIDS-like disease, characterized by depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, as well as lung, heart, and kidney diseases. In order to determine the contribution of distinct populations of hematopoietic cells to the development of this AIDS-like disease, five additional Tg strains expressing Nef through restricted cell-specific regulatory elements were generated. These Tg strains express Nef in CD4⁺ T cells, DCs, and macrophages (CD4E/HIV^Nef); in CD4⁺ T cells and DCs (mCD4/HIV^Nef and CD4F/HIV^Nef); in macrophages and DCs (CD68/HIV^Nef); or mainly in DCs (CD11c/HIV^Nef). None of these Tg strains developed significant lung and kidney diseases, suggesting the existence of as-yet-unidentified Nef-expressing cell subset(s) that are responsible for inducing organ disease in CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice. Mice from all five strains developed persistent oral carriage of Candida albicans, suggesting an impaired immune function. Only strains expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells showed CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, activation, and apoptosis. These results demonstrate that expression of Nef in CD4⁺ T cells is the primary determinant of their depletion. Therefore, the pattern of Nef expression in specific cell population(s) largely determines the nature of the resulting pathological changes.The major cell targets and reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in vivo are CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (macrophages and dendritic cells [DC]) (21, 24, 51). The cell specificity of these viruses is largely dependent on the expression of CD4 and of its coreceptors, CCR5 and CXCR-4, at the cell surface (29, 66). Infection of these immune cells leads to the severe disease, AIDS, showing widespread manifestations, including progressive immunodeficiency, immune activation, CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, wasting, dementia, nephropathy, heart and lung diseases, and susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens, such as Candida albicans (1, 27, 31, 37, 41, 82, 93, 109). It is reasonable to assume that the various pathological changes in AIDS result from the expression of one or many HIV-1/SIV proteins in these immune target cells. However, assigning the contribution of each infected cell subset to each phenotype has been remarkably difficult, despite evidence that AIDS T-cell phenotypes can present very differently depending on the strains of infecting HIV-1 or SIV or on the cells targeted by the virus (4, 39, 49, 52, 72). For example, the T-cell-tropic X4 HIV strains have long been associated with late events and severe CD4⁺ T-cell depletion (22, 85, 96). However, there are a number of target cell subsets expressing CD4 and CXCR-4, and identifying which one is responsible for this enhanced virulence has not been achieved in vivo. Similarly, the replication of SIV in specific regions of the thymus (cortical versus medullary areas), has been associated with very different outcomes but, unfortunately, the critical target cells of the viruses were not identified either in these studies (60, 80). The task is even more complex, because HIV-1 or SIV can infect several cell subsets within a single cell population. In the thymus, double (CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (DN) or triple (CD3⁻ CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (TN) T cells, as well as double-positive (CD4⁺ CD8⁺) (DP) T cells, are infectible by HIV-1 in vitro (9, 28, 74, 84, 98, 99, 110) and in SCID-hu mice (2, 5, 91, 94). In peripheral organs, gut memory CCR5⁺ CD4⁺ T cells are primarily infected with R5 SIV, SHIV, or HIV, while circulating CD4⁺ T cells can be infected by X4 viruses (13, 42, 49, 69, 70, 100, 101, 104). Moreover, some detrimental effects on CD4⁺ T cells have been postulated to originate from HIV-1/SIV gene expression in bystander cells, such as macrophages or DC, suggesting that other infected target cells may contribute to the loss of CD4⁺ T cells (6, 7, 32, 36, 64, 90).Similarly, the infected cell population(s) required and sufficient to induce the organ diseases associated with HIV-1/SIV expression (brain, heart, and kidney) have not yet all been identified. For lung or kidney disease, HIV-specific cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells (1, 75) or infected podocytes (50, 95), respectively, have been implicated. Activated macrophages have been postulated to play an important role in heart disease (108) and in AIDS dementia (35), although other target cells could be infected by macrophage-tropic viruses and may contribute significantly to the decrease of central nervous system functions (11, 86, 97), as previously pointed out (25).Therefore, because of the widespread nature of HIV-1 infection and the difficulty in extrapolating tropism of HIV-1/SIV in vitro to their cell targeting in vivo (8, 10, 71), alternative approaches are needed to establish the contribution of individual infected cell populations to the multiorgan phenotypes observed in AIDS. To this end, we developed a transgenic (Tg) mouse model of AIDS using a nonreplicating HIV-1 genome expressed through the regulatory sequences of the human CD4 gene (CD4C), in the same murine cells as those targeted by HIV-1 in humans, namely, in immature and mature CD4⁺ T cells, as well as in cells of the macrophage/DC lineages (47, 48, 77; unpublished data). These CD4C/HIV Tg mice develop a multitude of pathologies closely mimicking those of AIDS patients. These include a gradual destruction of the immune system, characterized among other things by thymic and lymphoid organ atrophy, depletion of mature and immature CD4⁺ T lymphocytes, activation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, susceptibility to mucosal candidiasis, HIV-associated nephropathy, and pulmonary and cardiac complications (26, 43, 44, 57, 76, 77, 79, 106). We demonstrated that Nef is the major determinant of the HIV-1 pathogenicity in CD4C/HIV Tg mice (44). The similarities of the AIDS-like phenotypes of these Tg mice to those in human AIDS strongly suggest that such a Tg mouse approach can be used to investigate the contribution of distinct HIV-1-expressing cell populations to their development.In the present study, we constructed and characterized five additional mouse Tg strains expressing Nef, through distinct regulatory elements, in cell populations more restricted than in CD4C/HIV Tg mice. The aim of this effort was to assess whether, and to what extent, the targeting of Nef in distinct immune cell populations affects disease development and progression.     

Caveolin-1 Modulates HIV-1 Envelope-Induced Bystander Apoptosis through gp41

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope (Env)-mediated bystander apoptosis is known to cause the progressive, severe, and irreversible loss of CD4⁺ T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. Env-induced bystander apoptosis has been shown to be gp41 dependent and related to the membrane hemifusion between envelope-expressing cells and target cells. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1), the scaffold protein of specific membrane lipid rafts called caveolae, has been reported to interact with gp41. However, the underlying pathological or physiological meaning of this robust interaction remains unclear. In this report, we examine the interaction of cellular Cav-1 and HIV gp41 within the lipid rafts and show that Cav-1 modulates Env-induced bystander apoptosis through interactions with gp41 in SupT1 cells and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes isolated from human peripheral blood. Cav-1 significantly suppressed Env-induced membrane hemifusion and caspase-3 activation and augmented Hsp70 upregulation. Moreover, a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence markedly inhibited bystander apoptosis and apoptotic signal pathways. Our studies shed new light on the potential role of Cav-1 in limiting HIV pathogenesis and the development of a novel therapeutic strategy in treating HIV-1-infected patients.HIV infection causes a progressive, severe, and irreversible depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, which is responsible for the development of AIDS (9). The mechanism through which HIV infection induces cell death involves a variety of processes (58). Among these processes, apoptosis is most likely responsible for T-cell destruction in HIV-infected patients (33), because active antiretroviral therapy has been associated with low levels of CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (7), and AIDS progression was shown previously to correlate with the extent of immune cell apoptosis (34). Importantly, bystander apoptosis of uninfected cells was demonstrated to be one of the major processes involved in the destruction of immune cells (58), with the majority of apoptotic CD4⁺ T cells in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes being uninfected in HIV patients (22).Binding to uninfected cells or the entry of viral proteins released by infected cells is responsible for the virus-mediated killing of innocent-bystander CD4⁺ T cells (2-4, 9, 65). The HIV envelope glycoprotein complex, consisting of gp120 and gp41 subunits expressed on an HIV-infected cell membrane (73), is believed to induce bystander CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (58). Although there is a soluble form of gp120 in the blood, there is no conclusive agreement as to whether the concentration is sufficient to trigger apoptosis (57, 58). The initial step in HIV infection is mediated by the Env glycoprotein gp120 binding with high affinity to CD4, the primary receptor on the target cell surface, which is followed by interactions with the chemokine receptor CCR5 or CXCR4 (61). This interaction triggers a conformational change in gp41 and the insertion of its N-terminal fusion peptide into the target membrane (30). Next, a prehairpin structure containing leucine zipper-like motifs is formed by the two conserved coiled-coil domains, called the N-terminal and C-terminal heptad repeats (28, 66, 70). This structure quickly collapses into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure with an N-terminal heptad repeat inside and a hydrophobic C-terminal heptad repeat outside (28, 66, 70). The formation of the six-helix bundle leads to a juxtaposition and fusion with the target cell membrane (28, 66, 70). The fusogenic potential of HIV Env is proven to correlate with the pathogenesis of both CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic viruses by not only delivering the viral genome to uninfected cells but also mediating Env-induced bystander apoptosis (71). Initial infection is dominated by the CCR5-tropic strains, with the CXCR4-tropic viruses emerging in the later stages of disease (20). Studies have shown that CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 triggers more depletion of CD4⁺ T cells than CCR5-tropic strains (36).Glycolipid- and cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, are spatially organized plasma membranes and are known to have many diverse functions (26, 53). These functions include membrane trafficking, endocytosis, the regulation of cholesterol and calcium homeostasis, and signal transduction in cellular growth and apoptosis. Lipid rafts have also been implicated in HIV cell entry and budding processes (19, 46, 48, 51). One such organelle is the caveola, which is a small, flask-shaped (50 to 100 nm in diameter) invagination in the plasma membrane (5, 62). The caveola structure, which is composed of proteins known as caveolins, plays a role in various functions by serving as a mobile platform for many receptors and signal proteins (5, 62). Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a 22- to 24-kDa major coat protein responsible for caveola assembly (25, 47). This scaffolding protein forms a hairpin-like structure and exists as an oligomeric complex of 14 to 16 monomers (21). Cav-1 has been shown to be expressed by a variety of cell types, mostly endothelial cells, type I pneumocytes, fibroblasts, and adipocytes (5, 62). In addition, Cav-1 expression is evident in immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (38, 39). However, Cav-1 is not expressed in isolated thymocytes (49). Furthermore, Cav-1 and caveolar structures are absent in human or murine T-cell lines (27, 41, 68). Contrary to this, there has been one report showing evidence of Cav-1 expression in bovine primary cell subpopulations of CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD21⁺, and IgM⁺ cells with Cav-1 localized predominantly in the perinuclear region (38). That report also demonstrated a membrane region staining with Cav-1-specific antibody of human CD21⁺ and CD26⁺ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Recently, the expression of Cav-1 in activated murine B cells, with a potential role in the development of a thymus-independent immune response, was also reported (56). It remains to be determined whether Cav-1 expression is dependent on the activation state of lymphocytes. For macrophages, however, which are one of the main cell targets for HIV infection, Cav-1 expression has been clearly documented (38).The scaffolding domain of Cav-1, located in the juxtamembranous region of the N terminus, is responsible for its oligomerization and binding to various proteins (5, 62, 64). It recognizes a consensus binding motif, ΦXΦXXXXΦ, ΦXXXXΦXXΦ, or ΦXΦXXXXΦXXΦ, where Φ indicates an aromatic residue (F, W, or Y) and X indicates any residue (5, 62, 64). A Cav-1 binding motif (WNNMTWMQW) has been identified in the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41 (42, 43). Cav-1 has been shown to associate with gp41 by many different groups under various circumstances, including the immunoprecipitation of gp41 and Cav-1 in HIV-infected cells (42, 43, 52). However, the underlying pathological or physiological functions of this robust interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 remain unclear.Here, we report that the interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 leads to a modification of gp41 function, which subsequently regulates Env-induced T-cell bystander apoptosis. Moreover, we show that a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence is capable of modulating Env-induced bystander apoptosis, which suggests a novel therapeutic application for HIV-1-infected patients.     

Effective Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Lack an Easily Detectable,Shared Characteristic

The immune correlates of human/simian immunodeficiency virus control remain elusive. While CD8⁺ T lymphocytes likely play a major role in reducing peak viremia and maintaining viral control in the chronic phase, the relative antiviral efficacy of individual virus-specific effector populations is unknown. Conventional assays measure cytokine secretion of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells after cognate peptide recognition. Cytokine secretion, however, does not always directly translate into antiviral efficacy. Recently developed suppression assays assess the efficiency of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to control viral replication, but these assays often use cell lines or clones. We therefore designed a novel virus production assay to test the ability of freshly ex vivo-sorted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication from SIVmac239-infected CD4⁺ T cells. Using this assay, we established an antiviral hierarchy when we compared CD8⁺ T cells specific for 12 different epitopes. Antiviral efficacy was unrelated to the disease status of each animal, the protein from which the tested epitopes were derived, or the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I restriction of the tested epitopes. Additionally, there was no correlation with the ability to suppress viral replication and epitope avidity, epitope affinity, CD8⁺ T-cell cytokine multifunctionality, the percentage of central and effector memory cell populations, or the expression of PD-1. The ability of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication therefore cannot be determined using conventional assays. Our results suggest that a single definitive correlate of immune control may not exist; rather, a successful CD8⁺ T-cell response may be comprised of several factors.CD8⁺ T cells may play a critical role in blunting peak viremia and controlling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) replication. The transient depletion of CD8⁺ cells in SIV-infected macaques results in increased viral replication (26, 31, 51, 70). The emergence of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells coincides with the reduction of peak viremia (12, 39, 42, 63), and CD8⁺ T-cell pressure selects for escape mutants (6, 9, 13, 28, 29, 38, 60, 61, 85). Furthermore, particular major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles are overrepresented in SIV- and HIV-infected elite controllers (15, 29, 33, 34, 46, 56, 88).Because it has been difficult to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (Abs), the AIDS vaccine field is currently focused on developing a vaccine designed to elicit HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (8, 52, 53, 82). Investigators have tried to define the immune correlates of HIV control. Neither the magnitude nor the breadth of epitopes recognized by virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses correlates with the control of viral replication (1). The quality of the immune response may, however, contribute to the antiviral efficacy of the effector cells. It has been suggested that the number of cytokines that virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells secrete may correlate with viral control, since HIV-infected nonprogressors appear to maintain CD8⁺ T cells that secrete several cytokines, compared to HIV-infected progressors (11, 27). An increased amount of perforin secretion may also be related to the proliferation of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in HIV-infected nonprogressors (55). While those studies offer insight into the different immune systems of progressors and nonprogressors, they did not address the mechanism of viral control. Previously, we found no association between the ability of SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell clones to suppress viral replication in vitro and their ability to secrete gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), or interleukin-2 (IL-2) (18).Evidence suggests that some HIV/SIV proteins may be better vaccine targets than others. CD8⁺ T cells recognize epitopes derived from Gag as early as 2 h postinfection, whereas CD8⁺ T cells specific for epitopes in Env recognize infected cells only at 18 h postinfection (68). Additionally, a previously reported study of HIV-infected individuals showed that an increased breadth of Gag-specific responses was associated with lower viral loads (35, 59, 65, 66). CD8⁺ T-cell responses specific for Env, Rev, Tat, Vif, Vpr, Vpu, and Nef were associated with higher viral loads, with increased breadth of Env in particular being significantly associated with a higher chronic-phase viral set point.None of the many sophisticated methods employed for analyzing the characteristics of HIV- or SIV-specific immune responses clearly demarcate the critical qualities of an effective antiviral response. In an attempt to address these questions, we developed a new assay to measure the antiviral efficacy of individual SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses sorted directly from fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Using MHC class I tetramers specific for the epitope of interest, we sorted freshly isolated virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells and determined their ability to suppress virus production from SIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells. We then looked for a common characteristic of efficacious epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells using traditional methods.     

Activation of the Inositol (1,4,5)-Triphosphate Calcium Gate Receptor Is Required for HIV-1 Gag Release

The structural precursor polyprotein, Gag, encoded by all retroviruses, including the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), is necessary and sufficient for the assembly and release of particles that morphologically resemble immature virus particles. Previous studies have shown that the addition of Ca²⁺ to cells expressing Gag enhances virus particle production. However, no specific cellular factor has been implicated as mediator of Ca²⁺ provision. The inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) gates intracellular Ca²⁺ stores. Following activation by binding of its ligand, IP3, it releases Ca²⁺ from the stores. We demonstrate here that IP3R function is required for efficient release of HIV-1 virus particles. Depletion of IP3R by small interfering RNA, sequestration of its activating ligand by expression of a mutated fragment of IP3R that binds IP3 with very high affinity, or blocking formation of the ligand by inhibiting phospholipase C-mediated hydrolysis of the precursor, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate, inhibited Gag particle release. These disruptions, as well as interference with ligand-receptor interaction using antibody targeted to the ligand-binding site on IP3R, blocked plasma membrane accumulation of Gag. These findings identify IP3R as a new determinant in HIV-1 trafficking during Gag assembly and introduce IP3R-regulated Ca²⁺ signaling as a potential novel cofactor in viral particle release.Assembly of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is determined by a single gene that encodes a structural polyprotein precursor, Gag (71), and may occur at the plasma membrane or within late endosomes/multivesicular bodies (LE/MVB) (7, 48, 58; reviewed in reference 9). Irrespective of where assembly occurs, the assembled particle is released from the plasma membrane of the host cell. Release of Gag as virus-like particles (VLPs) requires the C-terminal p6 region of the protein (18, 19), which contains binding sites for Alix (60, 68) and Tsg101 (17, 37, 38, 41, 67, 68). Efficient release of virus particles requires Gag interaction with Alix and Tsg101. Alix and Tsg101 normally function to sort cargo proteins to LE/MVB for lysosomal degradation (5, 15, 29, 52). Previous studies have shown that addition of ionomycin, a calcium ionophore, and CaCl₂ to the culture medium of cells expressing Gag or virus enhances particle production (20, 48). This is an intriguing observation, given the well-documented positive role for Ca²⁺ in exocytotic events (33, 56). It is unclear which cellular factors might regulate calcium availability for the virus release process.Local and global elevations in the cytosolic Ca²⁺ level are achieved by ion release from intracellular stores and by influx from the extracellular milieu (reviewed in reference 3). The major intracellular Ca²⁺ store is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER); stores also exist in MVB and the nucleus. Ca²⁺ release is regulated by transmembrane channels on the Ca²⁺ store membrane that are formed by tetramers of inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) proteins (reviewed in references 39, 47, and 66). The bulk of IP3R channels mediate release of Ca²⁺ from the ER, the emptying of which signals Ca²⁺ influx (39, 51, 57, 66). The few IP3R channels on the plasma membrane have been shown to be functional as well (13). Through proteomic analysis, we identified IP3R as a cellular protein that was enriched in a previously described membrane fraction (18) which, in subsequent membrane floatation analyses, reproducibly cofractionated with Gag and was enriched in the membrane fraction only when Gag was expressed. That IP3R is a major regulator of cytosolic calcium concentration (Ca²⁺) is well documented (39, 47, 66). An IP3R-mediated rise in cytosolic Ca²⁺ requires activation of the receptor by a ligand, inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate (IP3), which is produced when phospholipase C (PLC) hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂] at the plasma membrane (16, 25, 54). Paradoxically, PI(4,5)P₂ binds to the matrix (MA) domain in Gag (8, 55, 59), and the interaction targets Gag to PI(4,5)P₂-enriched regions on the plasma membrane; these events are required for virus release (45). We hypothesized that PI(4,5)P₂ binding might serve to target Gag to plasma membrane sites of localized Ca²⁺ elevation resulting from PLC-mediated PI(4,5)P₂ hydrolysis and IP3R activation. This idea prompted us to investigate the role of IP3R in Gag function.Here, we show that HIV-1 Gag requires steady-state levels of IP3R for its efficient release. Three isoforms of IP3R, types 1, 2, and 3, are encoded in three independent genes (39, 47). Types 1 and 3 are expressed in a variety of cells and have been studied most extensively (22, 39, 47, 73). Depletion of the major isoforms in HeLa or COS-1 cells by small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited viral particle release. Moreover, we show that sequestration of the IP3R activating ligand or blocking ligand formation also inhibited Gag particle release. The above perturbations, as well as interfering with receptor expression or activation, led to reduced Gag accumulation at the cell periphery. The results support the conclusion that IP3R activation is required for efficient HIV-1 viral particle release.     

Additive Contribution of HLA Class I Alleles in the Immune Control of HIV-1 Infection

Previous studies have identified a central role for HLA-B alleles in influencing control of HIV infection. An alternative possibility is that a small number of HLA-B alleles may have a very strong impact on HIV disease outcome, dominating the contribution of other HLA alleles. Here, we find that even following the exclusion of subjects expressing any of the HLA-B class I alleles (B*57, B*58, and B*18) identified to have the strongest influence on control, the dominant impact of HLA-B alleles on virus set point and absolute CD4 count variation remains significant. However, we also find that the influence of HLA on HIV control in this C-clade-infected cohort from South Africa extends beyond HLA-B as HLA-Cw type remains a significant predictor of virus and CD4 count following exclusion of the strongest HLA-B associations. Furthermore, there is evidence of interdependent protective effects of the HLA-Cw*0401-B*8101, HLA-Cw*1203-B*3910, and HLA-A*7401-B*5703 haplotypes that cannot be explained solely by linkage to a protective HLA-B allele. Analysis of individuals expressing both protective and detrimental alleles shows that even the strongest HLA alleles appear to have an additive rather than dominant effect on HIV control at the individual level. Finally, weak but significant frequency-dependent effects in this cohort can be detected only by looking at an individual''s combined HLA allele frequencies. Taken together, these data suggest that although individual HLA alleles, particularly HLA-B, can have a strong impact, HIV control overall is likely to be influenced by the additive effect of some or all of the other HLA alleles present.HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells play a central role in resolution of primary viremia and the long-term suppression of viral replication (13). Supporting this notion is the observed correlation between possession of particular human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I alleles and control of HIV, measured both directly by time-to-AIDS (5, 6) and indirectly via clinical markers of disease progression (viral load [VL] and CD4 count) (15, 26, 28). Specific HLA class I alleles have been associated with relatively successful control of viral replication and slow disease progression, most notably, alleles HLA-B*57 and HLA-B*27 (1, 7, 12, 15, 21, 23), and also with relatively ineffective control of viral replication and rapid disease progression [B*35(Px), B*5802, and B*18] (5, 15, 17, 23). In addition, general trends suggesting an HLA class I heterozygote advantage (5) and rare allele advantage (28) and, most recently, a correlation between levels of surface expression linked to certain HLA-Cw alleles (11, 27) and HIV control has also been described.Among the different HLA class I loci, the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses restricted by HLA-B alleles are thought to play the central role in determining disease outcome: the majority of detectable HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses are restricted by HLA-B alleles (3, 15, 16), HLA-B-restricted responses typically express a more effective “polyfunctional” phenotype (14), the strongest HLA-associations with either slow or rapid progression are with HLA-B alleles (5, 10, 11, 15), and HLA-B-restricted CD8⁺ T cells exert the strongest selection pressure on the virus (15, 19, 24). However, whether this apparent association between HIV immune control and HLA-B is a general and causal trend or, rather, is biased by the coincidence that the strongest HLA associations with either extreme of disease control happen, by chance, to involve HLA-B alleles remains uncertain.In order to further investigate the correlation between HLA type and HIV infection control, we here examine a cohort now comprising >1,200 chronically HIV C-clade-infected, treatment-naïve subjects from Durban, South Africa, in an extended analysis following from our previous studies of a smaller cohort (15). We first address the question of whether the dominant role of HLA-B in this population compared to the roles of HLA-A or HLA-C results from the influence of HLA-B alleles in general or is dependent on a few known strong associations, such as that between HLA-B*57 alleles and low viremia. Second, in light of recent data (11, 27), we assess the impact of HLA-C alleles on HIV disease outcome and examine the effect of HLA haplotypes on observed HLA associations with disease control. Third, we investigate the question of whether the impact of certain HLA-B alleles on HIV outcome dominates that of other HLA-B alleles to negate the contribution of the latter or whether the impact of individual HLA alleles can be additive. Finally, we compare the impact of individual HLA alleles on HIV on immune control to the impact of heterozygote and rare allele advantage in this cohort.     

Defective Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Polyfunctionality,Proliferation, and Cytotoxicity Are Not Restored by Antiretroviral Therapy

Identifying the functions of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells that are not merely modulated by the level of virus but clearly distinguish patients with immune control from those without such control is of paramount importance. Features of the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response in antiretroviral-treated patients (designated Rx <50) and untreated patients (long-term nonprogressors [LTNP]) matched for very low HIV RNA levels were comprehensively examined. The proliferative capacity of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells was not restored in Rx <50 to the level observed in LTNP, even though HIV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation in the two patient groups was comparable. This diminished HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation in Rx <50 was primarily due to a smaller fraction of antigen-specific cells recruited to divide and not to the numbers of divisions that proliferating cells had undergone. Exogenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) induced proliferating cells to divide further but did not rescue the majority of antigen-specific cells with defective proliferation. In addition, differences in HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation could not be attributed to differences in cellular subsets bearing a memory phenotype, IL-2 production, or PD-1 expression. Although polyfunctionality of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in Rx <50 was not restored to the levels observed in LTNP despite prolonged suppression of HIV RNA levels, per-cell cytotoxic capacity was the functional feature that most clearly distinguished the cells of LTNP from those of Rx <50. Taken together, these data suggest that there are selective qualitative abnormalities within the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell compartment that persist under conditions of low levels of antigen.Understanding the features of an effective immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is among the most important goals for the design of HIV vaccines and immunotherapies. Most HIV-infected patients develop persistent viremia and CD4⁺ T-cell decline in the absence of antiviral therapy. However, evidence that immunologic control of HIV is possible can be drawn from a small group of rare patients who maintain normal CD4⁺ T-cell counts and restrict HIV replication to below 50 copies/ml plasma for up to 25 years without antiretroviral therapy (ART) (4, 22, 31, 40). Historically, these unique individuals were included within heterogeneous cohorts referred to as long-term survivors or long-term nonprogressors (LTNP), categorized solely based on their disease-free survival exceeding 7 to 10 years and their stable CD4⁺ T-cell counts (21). Over time, it became apparent that only a small subset of individuals within these cohorts had truly nonprogressive infection, maintaining good health with nondeclining CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and these true nonprogressors tended to have HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels below the lower detection limits of the newly available assays (23, 31). Some investigators have adopted other designations more recently, including elite controllers, elite suppressors, or HIV controllers. These designations vary by institution and, in some cases, rely only upon viral load measurements without a requirement for stable CD4⁺ T-cell counts (4, 22, 40). However, for our designation of true LTNP, we employ the inclusion criteria of stable health, nondeclining CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and maintenance of plasma viral RNA levels below 50 copies/ml without ART (29-31).Several lines of evidence strongly suggest that CD8⁺ T cells mediate this control of HIV in LTNP. HLA B*5701 is highly overrepresented in these patients, and in B*5701⁺ patients, the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response is largely focused on peptides restricted by the B57 protein (15, 31). In addition, similar control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication has been described in rhesus macaques carrying the Mamu B*08 or B*17 allele (25, 49). In these macaques, CD8⁺ T-cell depletion studies have strongly suggested that control of viral replication is mediated by CD8⁺ T cells (14). Although these results support the idea that CD8⁺ T cells are responsible for immunologic control, the mechanism remains incompletely understood.Several lines of evidence suggest that immunologic control in LTNP is not simply due to differences in autologous virus recognition by CD8⁺ T cells. The frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells specific for HIV or individual HIV-encoded gene products in the peripheral blood are not different in LTNP and untreated progressors (reviewed in reference 32). Putative “escape” mutations are found in viruses of both HLAB*57⁺ LTNP and HLA-matched progressors (4, 6, 28, 33, 34). In addition, comparable frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells of LTNP and progressors recognize autologous CD4⁺ T cells infected with the autologous virus (12, 28). Similar observations have recently been made in the rhesus macaque model (26). Collectively, these observations strongly suggest that features of the CD8⁺ T-cell response associated with immunologic control are not due to quantitative differences in the numbers of HIV-specific cells or to differential abilities of the autologous virus gene products to be recognized between patient groups.Several qualitative features in the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response have been associated with immunologic control in LTNP. LTNP have been found to have higher frequencies of “polyfunctional” CD8⁺ T cells, named for their ability to degranulate and produce multiple cytokines, including interleukin-2 (IL-2) (2, 5, 51). However, these cells comprise an extremely small proportion of the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response. In addition, there is considerable overlap between patient groups, and many LTNP have few or no such cells. Compared to those of progressors, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells of LTNP have a dramatically higher proliferative capacity, a greater ability to upregulate granzyme B (GrB) and perforin production, and a greater cytolytic capacity against autologous HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells (3, 17, 24, 29, 30). Increased HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity in LTNP compared to progressors has also been associated with lower PD-1 expression or IL-2 production by HIV-specific CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells (11, 24, 48, 51).Considerable controversy exists over the cause-and-effect relationships between these qualitative differences in the CD8⁺ T-cell response and HIV viremia between patient groups. High levels of antigen can have potent effects on diverse cell types in humans and in animal models. For HIV, lowering the level of viremia through ART has been observed to increase the function of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, NK cells, monocytes, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (16, 18, 20, 37, 41, 45-47, 50). However, the vast majority of treated progressors will not control HIV replication when ART is interrupted (7, 9, 35), suggesting that many of the qualitative differences in the CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T-cell response between LTNP and untreated progressors are not the cause of control over HIV but rather are likely an effect of viremia. In some but not all studies, ART was sufficient to restore the proliferative capacity, phenotype, and cytokine production by CD4⁺ T cells to levels similar to responses to other viruses or to the HIV-specific response of LTNP (13, 16, 18, 20, 37, 46, 50). Because better IL-2 production or function of HIV-specific CD4⁺ T cells has been associated with increased CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity (24), it has also been suggested that diminished proliferative capacity of progressor CD8⁺ T cells may be an effect of viremia during the chronic phase of infection. In some studies, ART is sufficient to increase the frequency of polyfunctional HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells or to decrease PD-1 expression (30, 41). However, the interpretations of the observations within these studies have relied on extrapolations between studies based upon cohorts with differing levels and durations of viral suppression or on examination of a limited number of functions or subsets in either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells.In the present study, we extended our earlier work and comprehensively examined a broad array of functions of HIV-specific T cells derived from two large patient groups, LTNP and progressors on ART, who possess comparable levels of HIV viremia as determined by a sensitive single-copy assay. In response to autologous HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity, IL-2 responsiveness, surface phenotype, PD-1 expression, polyfunctionality, and cytotoxic capacity were measured in considerable detail. We observe that although ART results in restoration of many of these functions, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell polyfunctionality and proliferative and killing capacities are not restored to levels observed in LTNP.     

The Receptor Complex Associated with Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 3 (HTLV-3) Env-Mediated Binding and Entry Is Distinct from,but Overlaps with,the Receptor Complexes of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2

Little is known about the transmission or tropism of the newly discovered human retrovirus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 3 (HTLV-3). Here, we examine the entry requirements of HTLV-3 using independently expressed Env proteins. We observed that HTLV-3 surface glycoprotein (SU) binds efficiently to both activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. This contrasts with both HTLV-1 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD4⁺ T cells, and HTLV-2 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD8⁺ T cells. Binding studies with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), two molecules important for HTLV-1 entry, revealed that these molecules also enhance HTLV-3 SU binding. However, unlike HTLV-1 SU, HTLV-3 SU can bind efficiently in the absence of both HSPGs and NRP-1. Studies of entry performed with HTLV-3 Env-pseudotyped viruses together with SU binding studies revealed that, for HTLV-1, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) functions at a postbinding step during HTLV-3 Env-mediated entry. Further studies revealed that HTLV-3 SU binds efficiently to naïve CD4⁺ T cells, which do not bind either HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 SU and do not express detectable levels of HSPGs, NRP-1, and GLUT-1. These results indicate that the complex of receptor molecules used by HTLV-3 to bind to primary T lymphocytes differs from that of both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.The primate T-cell lymphotropic virus (PTLV) group of deltaretroviruses consists of three types of human T-cell lymphotropic viruses (HTLVs) (HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3), their closely related simian T-cell lymphotropic viruses (STLVs) (STLV-1, STLV-2, STLV-3), an HTLV (HTLV-4) for which a simian counterpart has not been yet identified, and an STLV (STLV-5) originally described as a divergent STLV-1 (5-7, 30, 35, 37, 38, 45, 51, 53). HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, which have a 70% nucleotide homology, differ in both their pathobiology and tropism (reviewed in reference 13). While HTLV-1 causes a neurological disorder (tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy) and a hematological disease (adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma) (15, 42, 55), HTLV-2 is only rarely associated with tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy-like disease and is not definitively linked to any lymphoproliferative disease (12, 20). In vivo, both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infect T cells. Although HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, other cell types in the peripheral blood of infected individuals have been found to contain HTLV-1, including CD8⁺ T cells, dendritic cells, and B cells (19, 29, 33, 36, 46).Binding and entry of retroviruses requires specific interactions between the Env glycoproteins on the virus and cell surface receptor complexes on target cells. For HTLV-1, three molecules have been identified as important for entry, as follows: heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) (16, 22, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39, 44). Recent studies support a model in which HSPG and NRP-1 function during the initial binding of HTLV-1 to target cells, and GLUT-1 functions at a postattachment stage, most likely to facilitate fusion (29, 34, 49). Efficient HTLV-2 binding and entry requires NRP-1 and GLUT-1 but not HSPGs (16, 26, 39, 49).This difference in the molecules required for binding to target cells reflects differences in the T-cell tropisms of these two viruses. Activated CD4⁺ T cells express much higher levels of HSPGs than CD8⁺ T cells (26). In infected individuals, HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, while HTLV-2 is primarily found in CD8⁺ T cells (21, 43, 46). In vitro, HTLV-1 preferentially transforms CD4⁺ T cells while HTLV-2 preferentially transforms CD8⁺ T cells, and this difference has been mapped to the Env proteins (54).We and others have reported the discovery of HTLV-3 in two Cameroonese inhabitants (6, 7, 53). We recently uncovered the presence of a third HTLV-3 strain in a different population living several hundred kilometers away from the previously identified groups (5), suggesting that this virus may be common in central Africa. Since the HTLV-3 sequences were obtained by PCR amplification of DNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of infected individuals, little is known about its tropism and pathobiology in vivo. Based on the correlation between HSPG expression levels and viral tropisms of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, we reasoned that knowledge about the HTLV-3 receptors might provide insight into the tropism of this virus. We therefore generated vectors expressing HTLV-3 Env proteins and used them to begin to characterize the receptor complex used by HTLV-3 to bind and enter cells.     

Impact of HLA in Mother and Child on Disease Progression of Pediatric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

A broad Gag-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response is associated with effective control of adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The association of certain HLA class I molecules, such as HLA-B*57, -B*5801, and -B*8101, with immune control is linked to mutations within Gag epitopes presented by these alleles that allow HIV to evade the immune response but that also reduce viral replicative capacity. Transmission of such viruses containing mutations within Gag epitopes results in lower viral loads in adult recipients. In this study of pediatric infection, we tested the hypothesis that children may tend to progress relatively slowly if either they themselves possess one of the protective HLA-B alleles or the mother possesses one of these alleles, thereby transmitting a low-fitness virus to the child. We analyzed HLA type, CD8⁺ T-cell responses, and viral sequence changes for 61 mother-child pairs from Durban, South Africa, who were monitored from birth. Slow progression was significantly associated with the mother or child possessing one of the protective HLA-B alleles, and more significantly so when the protective allele was not shared by mother and child (P = 0.007). Slow progressors tended to make CD8⁺ T-cell responses to Gag epitopes presented by the protective HLA-B alleles, in contrast to progressors expressing the same alleles (P = 0.07; Fisher''s exact test). Mothers expressing the protective alleles were significantly more likely to transmit escape variants within the Gag epitopes presented by those alleles than mothers not expressing those alleles (75% versus 21%; P = 0.001). Reversion of transmitted escape mutations was observed in all slow-progressing children whose mothers possessed protective HLA-B alleles. These data show that HLA class I alleles influence disease progression in pediatric as well as adult infection, both as a result of the CD8⁺ T-cell responses generated in the child and through the transmission of low-fitness viruses by the mother.Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells play a central role in controlling viral replication (12). It is the specificity of the CD8⁺ T-cell response, particularly the response to Gag, that is associated with low viral loads in HIV infection (7, 17, 34). Although immune control is undermined by the selection of viral mutations that prevent recognition by the CD8⁺ T cells, evasion of Gag-specific responses mediated by protective class I HLA-B alleles typically brings a reduction in viral replicative capacity, facilitating subsequent immune control of HIV (2, 20, 21). The same principle has been demonstrated in studies of simian immunodeficiency virus infection (18, 22).Recent studies showed that the class I HLA-B alleles that protect against disease progression present more Gag-specific CD8⁺ T-cell epitopes and drive the selection of more Gag-specific escape mutations than those alleles that are associated with high viral loads (23). These protective HLA-B alleles not only are beneficial to infected individuals expressing those alleles but also benefit a recipient following transmission, since the transmitted virus carrying multiple Gag escape mutations may have substantially reduced fitness (3, 4, 8). However, there is no benefit to the recipient if he or she shares the same protective allele as the donor because the transmitted virus carries escape mutations in the Gag epitopes that would otherwise be expected to mediate successful immune control in the recipient (8, 11).The sharing of HLA alleles between donor and recipient occurs frequently in mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). The risk of MTCT is related to viral load in the mother, and a high viral load is associated with nonprotective alleles, such as HLA-B*18 and -B*5802. This may contribute in two distinct ways to the more rapid progression observed in pediatric HIV infection (24, 26, 27). First, because infected children share 50% or more of their HLA alleles with the transmitting mother, they are less likely than adults to carry protective HLA alleles (16). Thus, infected children as a group carry fewer protective HLA alleles and more nonprotective HLA alleles. Second, even when the child has a protective allele, such as HLA-B*27, this allele does not offer protection if the maternally transmitted virus carries escape mutations within the key Gag epitopes that are presented by the protective allele (11, 19).However, it is clear that infected children who possess protective alleles, such as HLA-B*27 or HLA-B*57, can achieve durable immune control of HIV infection if the virus transmitted from the mother is not preadapted to those alleles (6, 10). HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses are detectable from birth in infected infants (32). Furthermore, as in adult infection (3, 8), HIV-infected children have the potential to benefit from transmission of low-fitness viruses in the situation where the mother possesses protective HLA alleles and the child does not share those protective alleles. MTCT of low-fitness viruses carrying CD8⁺ T-cell escape mutations was recently documented (28; J. Prado et al., unpublished data).In this study, undertaken in Durban, South Africa, we set out to test the hypothesis that HIV-infected children are less likely to progress rapidly to disease if either the infected child or the transmitting mother possesses a protective HLA allele that is not shared. The HLA alleles most strongly associated with low viral loads and high CD4 counts in a cohort of >1,200 HIV-infected adults in Durban are HLA-B*57 (-B*5702 and -B*5703), HLA-B*5801, and HLA-B*8101 (16; A. Leslie et al., unpublished data). These four alleles all present Gag-specific CD8⁺ T-cell epitopes, and in each case the escape mutations selected in these epitopes reduce viral replicative capacity (2-4, 8, 21, 23).Analyzing a previously described cohort of 61 HIV-infected children in Durban (24, 26, 32), South Africa, who were all monitored from birth, we first addressed the question of whether possession of any of these four alleles by either mother or child is associated with slower disease progression in the child and then determined whether sharing of protective alleles by mother and child affects the ability of the child to make the Gag-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses restricted by the shared allele.     

Protective HLA Class I Alleles That Restrict Acute-Phase CD8+ T-Cell Responses Are Associated with Viral Escape Mutations Located in Highly Conserved Regions of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

The control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) associated with particular HLA class I alleles suggests that some CD8⁺ T-cell responses may be more effective than others at containing HIV-1. Unfortunately, substantial diversities in the breadth, magnitude, and function of these responses have impaired our ability to identify responses most critical to this control. It has been proposed that CD8 responses targeting conserved regions of the virus may be particularly effective, since the development of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) escape mutations in these regions may significantly impair viral replication. To address this hypothesis at the population level, we derived near-full-length viral genomes from 98 chronically infected individuals and identified a total of 76 HLA class I-associated mutations across the genome, reflective of CD8 responses capable of selecting for sequence evolution. The majority of HLA-associated mutations were found in p24 Gag, Pol, and Nef. Reversion of HLA-associated mutations in the absence of the selecting HLA allele was also commonly observed, suggesting an impact of most CTL escape mutations on viral replication. Although no correlations were observed between the number or location of HLA-associated mutations and protective HLA alleles, limiting the analysis to mutations selected by acute-phase immunodominant responses revealed a strong positive correlation between mutations at conserved residues and protective HLA alleles. These data suggest that control of HIV-1 may be associated with acute-phase CD8 responses capable of selecting for viral escape mutations in highly conserved regions of the virus, supporting the inclusion of these regions in the design of an effective vaccine.Despite substantial advances in antiretroviral therapies, development of an effective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine remains a critical goal (6, 39, 82). Unfortunately, current vaccine efforts have failed to reduce infection rates in humans (9, 75) and have only achieved modest decreases in viral loads in the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/SHIV macaque model (21, 44, 81). A majority of these vaccine approaches have focused on inducing T-cell responses, utilizing large regions of the virus in an attempt to induce a broad array of immune responses (6, 34, 44, 81). While it is well established that CD8⁺ T-cell responses play a critical role in the containment of HIV-1 (45, 49, 67), supported in part by the strong association of particular HLA class I alleles with control of HIV (20, 33, 42, 61), it remains unclear which particular CD8⁺ T-cell responses are best able to control the virus and thus should be preferentially targeted by a vaccine. Studies comparing the magnitude, breadth, and function of CD8⁺ T-cell responses in subjects exhibiting either enhanced or poor control of HIV-1 have yielded few clues as to the specific factors associated with an effective CD8⁺ T-cell response (2, 28, 64, 67). Various differences in the functional capacity of T-cell responses have been observed in long-term nonprogressors (1, 26, 64), although it is possible that these differences may be reflective of an intact immune response, as opposed to having had directly enhanced immune control. As such, efforts are needed to identify factors or phenotypes associated with protective CD8⁺ T-cell responses in order to enable vaccines to induce the most effective responses.Recent studies have begun to suggest that the specificity of the CD8⁺ T-cell response, or the targeting of specific regions of the virus, may be associated with control of HIV-1. Preferential targeting of Gag, a structurally conserved viral protein responsible for multiple functions, has been associated with lower viral loads (25, 43, 56, 60, 77, 85). Furthermore, Kiepiela et al. (43) recently illustrated in a large cohort of 578 clade C-infected subjects that Gag-specific responses were associated with lowered viremia, in contrast to Env-specific responses, which were associated with higher viremia. These data are in line with previous observations that many of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles most strongly associated with control of HIV-1 and SIV, namely, HLA-B57, HLA-B27, and Mamu-A*01, restrict immunodominant CD8⁺ T-cell responses against the Gag protein (8, 10, 24, 63, 68, 83). However, other alleles associated with slower disease progression, such as HLA-B51 in humans and Mamu-B08 and B-17 in the rhesus macaque, do not immunodominantly target Gag, suggesting that targeting of some other regions of the virus may also be capable of eliciting control (8, 52-54). In addition, recent studies investigating the pattern of HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses during acute infection reveal that only a small subset of CD8⁺ T-cell responses restricted by any given HLA allele arise during acute infection and that there exist clear immunodominance patterns to these responses (8, 77, 85). Since control of HIV-1 is likely to be established or lost during the first few weeks of infection, these data suggest that potentially only a few key CD8⁺ T-cell responses may be needed to adequately establish early control of HIV-1.One of the major factors limiting the effectiveness of CD8⁺ T-cell responses is the propensity for HIV-1 to evade these responses through sequence evolution or viral escape (3, 13, 66). Even single point mutations within a targeted CD8 epitope can effectively abrogate recognition by either the HLA allele or the T-cell receptor. However, recent studies have begun to highlight that many sequence polymorphisms will revert to more common consensus residues upon transmission of HIV-1 to a new host, including many cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) escape mutations (4, 30, 33, 48, 50). Notably, the more rapidly reverting mutations have been observed to preferentially occur at conserved residues, indicating that structurally conserved regions of the virus may be particularly refractory to sequence changes (50). In support of these data, many CTL escape mutations have now been observed to directly impair viral replication (15, 23, 55, 74), in particular those known to either revert or require the presence of secondary compensatory mutations (15, 23, 73, 74). Taken together, these data suggest that, whereas CTL escape mutations provide a benefit to the virus to enable the evasion of host immune pressures, some of these mutations may come at a substantial cost to viral replication. These data may also imply that the association between Gag-specific responses and control of HIV-1 may be due to the targeting of highly conserved regions of the virus that are difficult to evade through sequence evolution.The propensity by which HIV-1 escapes CD8⁺ T-cell responses, and the reproducibility by which mutations arise at precise residues in targeted CD8 epitopes (3, 48), also enables the utilization of sequence data to predict which responses may be most capable of exerting immune selection pressure on the virus. Studies in HIV-1, SIV, and hepatitis C virus (16, 58, 65, 78) are now rapidly identifying immune-driven CTL escape mutations across these highly variable pathogens at the population level by correlating sequence polymorphisms in these viruses with the expression of particular HLA alleles. We provide here an analysis of HLA-associated mutations across the entire HIV-1 genome using a set of sequences derived from clade B chronically infected individuals. Through full-length viral genome coverage, these data provide an unbiased analysis of the location of these mutations and suggest that the control of HIV-1 by particular HLA alleles correlates with their ability to preferentially restrict early CD8⁺ T-cell responses capable of selecting for viral escape mutations at highly conserved residues of the virus. These data provide support for the inclusion of specific highly conserved regions of HIV-1 into vaccine antigens.