Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Conversion of Endogenous Indole-3-Butyric Acid to Indole-3-Acetic Acid Drives Cell Expansion in Arabidopsis Seedlings

Genetic evidence in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) suggests that the auxin precursor indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) is converted into active indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) by peroxisomal β-oxidation; however, direct evidence that Arabidopsis converts IBA to IAA is lacking, and the role of IBA-derived IAA is not well understood. In this work, we directly demonstrated that Arabidopsis seedlings convert IBA to IAA. Moreover, we found that several IBA-resistant, IAA-sensitive mutants were deficient in IBA-to-IAA conversion, including the indole-3-butyric acid response1 (ibr1) ibr3 ibr10 triple mutant, which is defective in three enzymes likely to be directly involved in peroxisomal IBA β-oxidation. In addition to IBA-to-IAA conversion defects, the ibr1 ibr3 ibr10 triple mutant displayed shorter root hairs and smaller cotyledons than wild type; these cell expansion defects are suggestive of low IAA levels in certain tissues. Consistent with this possibility, we could rescue the ibr1 ibr3 ibr10 short-root-hair phenotype with exogenous auxin. A triple mutant defective in hydrolysis of IAA-amino acid conjugates, a second class of IAA precursor, displayed reduced hypocotyl elongation but normal cotyledon size and only slightly reduced root hair lengths. Our data suggest that IBA β-oxidation and IAA-amino acid conjugate hydrolysis provide auxin for partially distinct developmental processes and that IBA-derived IAA plays a major role in driving root hair and cotyledon cell expansion during seedling development.The auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) controls both cell division and cell expansion and thereby orchestrates many developmental events and environmental responses. For example, auxin regulates lateral root initiation, root and stem elongation, and leaf expansion (for review, see Davies, 2004). Normal plant morphogenesis and environmental responses require modulation of auxin levels by controlling biosynthesis, regulating transport, and managing storage forms (for review, see Woodward and Bartel, 2005a). In some storage forms, the carboxyl group of IAA is conjugated to amino acids or peptides or to sugars, and free IAA can be released by hydrolases when needed (Bartel et al., 2001; Woodward and Bartel, 2005a). A second potential auxin storage form is the side chain-lengthened compound indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), which can be synthesized from IAA (Epstein and Ludwig-Müller, 1993) and is suggested to be shortened into IAA by peroxisomal β-oxidation (Bartel et al., 2001; Woodward and Bartel, 2005a).Genetic evidence suggests that the auxin activity of both IAA-amino acid conjugates and IBA requires free IAA to be released from these precursors (Bartel and Fink, 1995; Zolman et al., 2000). Mutation of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genes encoding IAA-amino acid hydrolases, including ILR1, IAR3, and ILL2, reduces plant sensitivity to the applied IAA-amino acid conjugates that are substrates of these enzymes, including IAA-Leu, IAA-Phe, and IAA-Ala (Bartel and Fink, 1995; Davies et al., 1999; LeClere et al., 2002; Rampey et al., 2004), which are present in Arabidopsis (Tam et al., 2000; Kowalczyk and Sandberg, 2001; Kai et al., 2007).Unlike the simple one-step release of free IAA from amino acid conjugates, release of IAA from IBA is suggested to require a multistep process (Zolman et al., 2007, 2008). Conversion of IBA to IAA has been demonstrated in a variety of plants (Fawcett et al., 1960; for review, see Epstein and Ludwig-Müller, 1993) and may involve β-oxidation of the four-carbon carboxyl side chain of IBA to the two-carbon side chain of IAA (Fawcett et al., 1960; Zolman et al., 2000, 2007). Mutation of genes encoding the apparent β-oxidation enzymes INDOLE-3-BUTYRIC ACID RESPONSE1 (IBR1), IBR3, or IBR10 results in IBA resistance, but does not alter IAA response or confer a dependence on exogenous carbon sources for growth following germination (Zolman et al., 2000, 2007, 2008), consistent with the possibility that these enzymes function in IBA β-oxidation but not fatty acid β-oxidation.Both conjugate hydrolysis and IBA β-oxidation appear to be compartmentalized. The IAA-amino acid hydrolases are predicted to be endoplasmic reticulum localized (Bartel and Fink, 1995; Davies et al., 1999) and enzymes required for IBA responses, including IBR1, IBR3, and IBR10, are peroxisomal (Zolman et al., 2007, 2008). Moreover, many peroxisome biogenesis mutants, such as peroxin5 (pex5) and pex7, are resistant to exogenous IBA, but remain IAA sensitive (Zolman et al., 2000; Woodward and Bartel, 2005b).Although the contributions of auxin transport to environmental and developmental auxin responses are well documented (for review, see Petrášek and Friml, 2009), the roles of various IAA precursors in these processes are less well understood. Expansion of root epidermal cells to control root architecture is an auxin-regulated process in which these roles can be dissected. Root epidermal cells provide soil contact and differentiate into files of either nonhair cells (atrichoblasts) or hair cells (trichoblasts). Root hairs emerge from trichoblasts as tube-shaped outgrowths that increase the root surface area, thus aiding in water and nutrient uptake (for review, see Grierson and Schiefelbein, 2002). Root hair length is determined by the duration of root hair tip growth, which is highly sensitive to auxin levels (for review, see Grierson and Schiefelbein, 2002). Mutants defective in the ABCG36/PDR8/PEN3 ABC transporter display lengthened root hairs and hyperaccumulate [³H]IBA, but not [³H]IAA, in root tip auxin transport assays (Strader and Bartel, 2009), suggesting that ABCG36 functions as an IBA effluxer and that IBA promotes root hair elongation. The related ABCG37/PDR9 transporter also can efflux IBA (Strader et al., 2008b; Růžička et al., 2010) and may have some functional overlap with ABCG36 (Růžička et al., 2010). In addition to lengthened root hairs, abcg36/pdr8/pen3 mutants display enlarged cotyledons, a second high-auxin phenotype. Both of these developmental phenotypes are suppressed by the mildly peroxisome-defective mutant pex5-1 (Strader and Bartel, 2009), suggesting that IBA contributes to cell expansion by serving as a precursor to IAA, which directly drives the increased cell expansion that underlies these phenotypes. However, whether IBA-derived IAA contributes to cell expansion events during development of wild-type plants is not known.Here, we directly demonstrate that peroxisome-defective mutants are defective in the conversion of IBA to IAA, consistent with previous reports that these genes are necessary for full response to applied IBA. We found that a mutant defective in three suggested IBA-to-IAA conversion enzymes displays low-auxin phenotypes, including decreased root hair expansion and decreased cotyledon size. We further found that these mutants suppress the long-root-hair and enlarged cotyledon phenotypes of an abcg36/pdr8 mutant, suggesting that endogenous IBA-derived IAA drives root hair and cotyledon expansion in wild-type seedlings.     

Rapid Identification of a Natural Knockout Allele of ARMADILLO REPEAT-CONTAINING KINESIN1 That Causes Root Hair Branching by Mapping-By-Sequencing

In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), branched root hairs are an indicator of defects in root hair tip growth. Among 62 accessions, one accession (Heiligkreuztal2 [HKT2.4]) displayed branched root hairs, suggesting that this accession carries a mutation in a gene of importance for tip growth. We determined 200- to 300-kb mapping intervals using a mapping-by-sequencing approach of F2 pools from crossings of HKT2.4 with three different accessions. The intersection of these mapping intervals was 80 kb in size featuring not more than 36 HKT2.4-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms, only two of which changed the coding potential of genes. Among them, we identified the causative single nucleotide polymorphism changing a splicing site in ARMADILLO REPEAT-CONTAINING KINESIN1. The applied strategies have the potential to complement statistical methods in high-throughput phenotyping studies using different natural accessions to identify causative genes for distinct phenotypes represented by only one or a few accessions.Root hairs are tubular tip outgrowths of single root epidermal cells (trichoblasts). They are an excellent genetic system and serve as a model to study the molecular components regulating tip growth (Carol and Dolan, 2002; Samaj et al., 2004; Lee and Yang, 2008). One of the main regulators of tip growth in root hairs is the small G protein RHO OF PLANTS2 (ROP2; Jones et al., 2002; Payne and Grierson, 2009). ROP2 determines the position of root hairs in incipient epidermal root hair cells and remains localized in the emerging tip during root hair tip growth (Molendijk et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2002). In addition, other factors have been identified to be important for growth and its directionality including phosphoinositides, cytoplasmic [Ca²⁺] gradients and their oscillation, reactive oxygen species, the RAB GTPase homolog A4B, and the cytoskeleton (Foreman et al., 2003; Preuss et al., 2004, 2006; Carol et al., 2005; Thole et al., 2008; Heilmann, 2009).Defects in essential processes for the establishment and maintenance of tip growth lead to deviations in root hair morphology such as branching and waviness (Samaj et al., 2004; Lee and Yang, 2008). Both the microtubules (MTs) and actin are important regulators of tip growth with MTs maintaining one growth point (Bibikova et al., 1999; Miller et al., 1999; Baluska et al., 2000). The latter is evident from the finding that artificially induced [Ca²⁺] gradients can induce additional growth tips when MTs are destroyed by drug treatments (Bibikova et al., 1999).Although the genetic and molecular analysis revealed a well-understood working model for root hair growth, little is known about the natural variation of the underlying processes. Which are the adaptive processes of relevance to specific environmental cues and which have already been selected for in natural accessions? One way to address this question is to link genotype and phenotype by association mapping using various Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) accessions. This is greatly facilitated by the 1001 Genomes Project (http://1001genomes.org), providing an increasing number of sequenced accessions. In some cases, phenotypes are only found in one or a few accessions. When the minor allele frequency (AF) is low, the identification of such rare causative alleles with genome-wide association mapping studies is challenging because they cannot be discriminated from false positives (e.g. sequencing errors or synthetic associations; Korte and Farlow, 2013), they are not detectable because of chosen thresholds, or they do not support a statistically significant value (Cantor et al., 2010). Other time-consuming approaches with low mapping resolution, such as quantitative trait loci mapping, need to be followed to identify the causative gene. For this, mapping-by-sequencing, which was originally developed for the identification of mutagen-induced changes in model species (Schneeberger et al., 2009b), can help to rapidly identify causal polymorphisms including nonmodel and nonreference strains (Nordström et al., 2013; Takagi et al., 2013). The resolution of mapping-by-sequencing experiments in Arabidopsis mapping populations is typically between multiple hundreds of kilobase pairs up to a few megabase pairs (James et al., 2013). Although intervals of this size allow the identification of causal mutations in forward genetic screens, they are problematic for the analysis of diverse Arabidopsis accessions because the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density is very high; consequently, hundreds of polymorphisms have to be considered.Here we report on a modification of the mapping-by-sequencing strategy providing a shortcut from distinct, monogenic accession-specific phenotypes to the causative SNP. When studying root hair morphology in 62 accessions for which the genome sequences were released by the 1001 Genomes Project (Cao et al., 2011), we found one accession (Heiligkreuztal2 [HKT2.4]) in which almost all root hairs were branched. To identify the causative gene, we used an approach based on mapping-by-sequencing. Instead of one outcross, we used outcrosses with three different accessions. We selected F2 seedlings exhibiting the distinct, monogenic, recessive root hair branching phenotype for sequencing. Combining the intersection of the three resulting mapping intervals with a selection for accession-specific SNPs revealed two primary candidate genes responsible for the root phenotype. We demonstrate that the causative SNP renders a splicing site in ARMADILLO REPEAT-CONTAINING KINESIN1 (ARK1) inactive and therefore leads to a defective ARK1/MORPHOGENESIS OF ROOT HAIR2 (MRH2) protein that is thought to coordinate actin microfilaments and MTs during tip growth of root hairs (Yang et al., 2007; Yoo and Blancaflor, 2013).