Widely Conserved Recombination Patterns among Single-Stranded DNA Viruses

The combinatorial nature of genetic recombination can potentially provide organisms with immediate access to many more positions in sequence space than can be reached by mutation alone. Recombination features particularly prominently in the evolution of a diverse range of viruses. Despite rapid progress having been made in the characterization of discrete recombination events for many species, little is currently known about either gross patterns of recombination across related virus families or the underlying processes that determine genome-wide recombination breakpoint distributions observable in nature. It has been hypothesized that the networks of coevolved molecular interactions that define the epistatic architectures of virus genomes might be damaged by recombination and therefore that selection strongly influences observable recombination patterns. For recombinants to thrive in nature, it is probably important that the portions of their genomes that they have inherited from different parents work well together. Here we describe a comparative analysis of recombination breakpoint distributions within the genomes of diverse single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) virus families. We show that whereas nonrandom breakpoint distributions in ssDNA virus genomes are partially attributable to mechanistic aspects of the recombination process, there is also a significant tendency for recombination breakpoints to fall either outside or on the peripheries of genes. In particular, we found significantly fewer recombination breakpoints within structural protein genes than within other gene types. Collectively, these results imply that natural selection acting against viruses expressing recombinant proteins is a major determinant of nonrandom recombination breakpoint distributions observable in most ssDNA virus families.Genetic recombination is a ubiquitous biological process that is both central to DNA repair pathways (10, 57) and an important evolutionary mechanism. By generating novel combinations of preexisting nucleotide polymorphisms, recombination can potentially accelerate evolution by increasing the population-wide genetic diversity upon which adaptive selection relies. Recombination can paradoxically also prevent the progressive accumulation of harmful mutations within individual genomes (18, 35, 53). Whereas its ability to defend high-fitness genomes from mutational decay possibly underlies the evolutionary value of sexuality in higher organisms, in many microbial species where pseudosexual genetic exchange is permissible among even highly divergent genomes, recombination can enable access to evolutionary innovations that would otherwise be inaccessible by mutation alone.Such interspecies recombination is fairly common in many virus families (8, 17, 27, 44, 82). It is becoming clear, however, that as with mutation events, most recombination events between distantly related genomes are maladaptive (5, 13, 38, 50, 63, 80). As genetic distances between parental genomes increase, so too does the probability of fitness defects in their recombinant offspring (16, 51). The viability of recombinants is apparently largely dependent on how severely recombination disrupts coevolved intragenome interaction networks (16, 32, 51). These networks include interacting nucleotide sequences that form secondary structures, sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions, interprotein interactions, and amino acid-amino acid interactions within protein three-dimensional folds.One virus family where such interaction networks appear to have a large impact on patterns of natural interspecies recombination are the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) geminiviruses. As with other ssDNA viruses, recombination is very common among the species of this family (62, 84). Partially conserved recombination hot and cold spots have been detected in different genera (39, 81) and are apparently caused by both differential mechanistic predispositions of genome regions to recombination and natural selection disfavoring the survival of recombinants with disrupted intragenome interaction networks (38, 51).Genome organization and rolling circle replication (RCR)—the mechanism by which geminiviruses and many other ssDNA viruses replicate (9, 67, 79; see reference 24 for a review)—seem to have a large influence on basal recombination rates in different parts of geminivirus genomes (20, 33, 39, 61, 81). To initiate RCR, virion-strand ssDNA molecules are converted by host-mediated pathways into double-stranded “replicative-form” (RF) DNAs (34, 67). Initiated by a virus-encoded replication-associated protein (Rep) at a well-defined virion-strand replication origin (v-ori), new virion strands are synthesized on the complementary strand of RF DNAs (28, 73, 74) by host DNA polymerases. Virion-strand replication is concomitant with the displacement of old virion strands, which, once complete, yields covalently closed ssDNA molecules which are either encapsidated or converted into additional RF DNAs. Genome-wide basal recombination rates in ssDNA viruses are probably strongly influenced by the specific characteristics of host DNA polymerases that enable RCR. Interruption of RCR has been implicated directly in geminivirus recombination (40) and is most likely responsible for increased basal recombination rates both within genes transcribed in the opposite direction from that of virion-strand replication (40, 71) and at the v-ori (1, 9, 20, 69, 74).Whereas most ssDNA virus families replicate via either a rolling circle mechanism (the Nanoviridae, Microviridae, and Geminiviridae) (3, 23, 24, 31, 59, 67, 74) or a related rolling hairpin mechanism (the Parvoviridae) (25, 76), among the Circoviridae only the Circovirus genus is known to use RCR (45). Although the Gyrovirus genus (the other member of the Circoviridae) and the anelloviruses (a currently unclassified ssDNA virus group) might also use RCR, it is currently unknown whether they do or not (78). Additionally, some members of the Begomovirus genus of the Geminiviridae either have a second genome component, called DNA-B, or are associated with satellite ssDNA molecules called DNA-1 and DNA-Beta, all of which also replicate by RCR (1, 47, 68).Recombination is known to occur in the parvoviruses (19, 43, 70), microviruses (66), anelloviruses (40, 46), circoviruses (11, 26, 60), nanoviruses (30), geminivirus DNA-B components, and geminivirus satellite molecules (2, 62). Given that most, if not all, of these ssDNA replicons are evolutionarily related to and share many biological features with the geminiviruses (22, 31, 36), it is of interest to determine whether conserved recombination patterns observed in the geminiviruses (61, 81) are evident in these other groups. To date, no comparative analyses have ever been performed with different ssDNA virus families to identify, for example, possible influences of genome organization on recombination breakpoint distributions found in these viruses.Here we compare recombination frequencies and recombination breakpoint distributions in most currently described ssDNA viruses and satellite molecules and identify a number of sequence exchange patterns that are broadly conserved across this entire group.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Tomato Bushy Stunt Virus Recombination Guided by Introduced MicroRNA Target Sequences

Previously we described Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) vectors, which retained their capsid protein gene and were engineered with magnesium chelatase (ChlH) and phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene sequences from Nicotiana benthamiana. Upon plant infection, these vectors eventually lost the inserted sequences, presumably as a result of recombination. Here, we modified the same vectors to also contain the plant miR171 or miR159 target sequences immediately 3′ of the silencing inserts. We inoculated N. benthamiana plants and sequenced recombinant RNAs recovered from noninoculated upper leaves. We found that while some of the recombinant RNAs retained the microRNA (miRNA) target sites, most retained only the 3′ 10 and 13 nucleotides of the two original plant miRNA target sequences, indicating in planta miRNA-guided RNA-induced silencing complex cleavage of the recombinant TBSV RNAs. In addition, recovered RNAs also contained various fragments of the original sequence (ChlH and PDS) upstream of the miRNA cleavage site, suggesting that the 3′ portion of the miRNA-cleaved TBSV RNAs served as a template for negative-strand RNA synthesis by the TBSV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), followed by template switching by the RdRp and continued RNA synthesis resulting in loss of nonessential nucleotides.Several plant viruses have been developed as tools for various biotechnology applications, including expression platforms for protein production in plants (1, 2, 6) and as gene silencing systems as part of reverse genetics approaches toward understanding host plant gene function (4, 5). For both of these applications, nonviral sequences conferring the desired function are cloned into the virus genome in order to be expressed during replication in plants. One advantage of using viruses engineered with nonviral sequences is flexibility in manipulating these “extra” sequences, which are not essential for viral replication or movement (1). However, recombinant viruses also tend to lose these sequences, causing instability at the insertion site and resulting in loss of function of the recombinant viral vector. The relatively high error rates of viral replicases (7, 14, 24) and the propensity for recombination events (9) contribute to the instability often seen with some viral vector systems.Recombination events in RNA viruses typically result in joining of two noncontiguous RNA segments (16). These could be sequences from two separate RNA molecules or distant regions of the same molecule. Retention by viruses of favorable sequences is selection driven and eliminates sequences that are unnecessary or negatively affect fitness (11, 31), hence making recombination critical to virus evolution (13, 29). Although phylogenetic analyses predict that recombination events have affected evolution for essentially all groups of RNA viruses (3), some viruses appear to be more prone to recombination than others. For example, plant-infecting supergroup II viruses of the family Tombusviridae appear to undergo frequent recombination, as is supported by the many well-characterized defective-interfering (DI) RNAs of Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) (10, 30). The TBSV DI RNAs, derived entirely from the parental viral RNA, are not replication competent alone and depend on the parent virus to replicate them in trans. Recent developments of in vitro systems (19, 21) have further enhanced dissection of recombination mechanisms giving rise to TBSV DI RNAs.Of the proposed mechanisms for viral recombination (12, 20), the copy choice or template-switching mechanism is the most widely reported (8, 16, 18). This occurs when the viral replicase and its attached nascent polynucleotide chain switches viral RNA templates (or jumps locations on the same template) when making cRNA. Some properties for preferred donor/acceptor sites (sequences in the RNA molecule at which viral replicase switches from one template to another) are known for various RNA viruses (3, 20, 27), suggesting that recombination is not entirely random.The previously described TBSV vectors were efficient silencers of host genes but only while the inserted sequences were retained (23). Thus, optimizing viral vectors requires a better understanding of factors responsible for recombination and consequent loss of insert sequences. In order to address possible recombination mechanisms, we used previously characterized sequence-specific microRNA (miRNA)-guided cleavage determinants as parts of our TBSV vectors. We introduced the miRNA target site sequences for miR171 or miR159 3′ to the silencing inserts of our TBSV vectors (23). After plant inoculation, we analyzed recombinant virus sequences, determining specific recombination patterns, and demonstrated miRNA-mediated recombination events in vivo for the recombinant TBSV vectors. We also showed miRNA-guided RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-mediated cleavage for recombinant TBSV RNA and evidence supporting the TBSV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) switching templates during cRNA synthesis.     

A trans-Complementing Recombination Trap Demonstrates a Low Propensity of Flaviviruses for Intermolecular Recombination

Intermolecular recombination between the genomes of closely related RNA viruses can result in the emergence of novel strains with altered pathogenic potential and antigenicity. Although recombination between flavivirus genomes has never been demonstrated experimentally, the potential risk of generating undesirable recombinants has nevertheless been a matter of concern and controversy with respect to the development of live flavivirus vaccines. As an experimental system for investigating the ability of flavivirus genomes to recombine, we developed a “recombination trap,” which was designed to allow the products of rare recombination events to be selected and amplified. To do this, we established reciprocal packaging systems consisting of pairs of self-replicating subgenomic RNAs (replicons) derived from tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) that could complement each other in trans and thus be propagated together in cell culture over multiple passages. Any infectious viruses with intact, full-length genomes that were generated by recombination of the two replicons would be selected and enriched by end point dilution passage, as was demonstrated in a spiking experiment in which a small amount of wild-type virus was mixed with the packaged replicons. Using the recombination trap and the JEV system, we detected two aberrant recombination events, both of which yielded unnatural genomes containing duplications. Infectious clones of both of these genomes yielded viruses with impaired growth properties. Despite the fact that the replicon pairs shared approximately 600 nucleotides of identical sequence where a precise homologous crossover event would have yielded a wild-type genome, this was not observed in any of these systems, and the TBEV and WNV systems did not yield any viable recombinant genomes at all. Our results show that intergenomic recombination can occur in the structural region of flaviviruses but that its frequency appears to be very low and that therefore it probably does not represent a major risk in the use of live, attenuated flavivirus vaccines.RNA viruses are able to undergo rapid genetic changes in order to adapt to new hosts or environments. Although much of this flexibility is due to the error-prone nature of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which generates an array of different point mutations within the viral population (23), recombination is also a common and important mechanism for generating viral diversity (18, 31, 42, 58). Recombination occurs when the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase switches templates during replication, an event that is favored when both templates share identical or very similar sequences. Three types of RNA recombination have been identified: homologous recombination occurs at sites with exact sequence matches; aberrant homologous recombination requires sequence homology, but crossover occurs either upstream or downstream of the site of homology, resulting in a duplication or deletion; and nonhomologous (or illegitimate) recombination is independent of sequence homology (31, 42).When the same cell is infected by viruses of two different strains, or even different species, recombination between their genomic RNAs can potentially lead to the emergence of new pathogens. A case in point is the emergence of Western equine encephalitis virus, a member of the genus Alphavirus, family Togaviridae, which arose by homologous recombination between Eastern equine encephalitis virus and Sindbis virus (14).Some mammalian RNA viruses can recombine at a frequency that is detectable in experimental settings (1, 2, 55), and phylogenetic analysis of partial or complete genome sequences suggests that RNA recombination is a widespread phenomenon. Naturally occurring recombinant viruses have been identified in almost every family of positive-stranded RNA viruses (31, 58).Flaviviruses are members of the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae, a family that also includes the genera Pestivirus and Hepacivirus. Several of the flaviviruses are important human pathogens, such as Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), West Nile virus (WNV), the dengue viruses, yellow fever virus, and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV).Although there has never been a report of a pathogenic flavivirus strain arising due to recombination involving attenuated vaccine strains (39), the urgent necessity to develop tetravalent vaccines containing all four serotypes of dengue virus—two such vaccines are currently undergoing clinical testing (45)—has recently brought the recombination issue to the forefront of discussion among researchers, regulators, and vaccine producers (39). It has been suggested that recombination, either between the strains present in a multivalent vaccine or between an attenuated vaccine strain and a wild-type strain, could lead to the emergence of new viruses with unpredictable properties (49).So far, recombination between flavivirus genomes has not been demonstrated directly in the laboratory. However, phylogenetic analysis of partial genome sequences available in the GenBank database has suggested that homologous recombination may have occurred between closely related strains of dengue virus (20, 52, 54, 59). An experimental approach for assessing the ability of flavivirus genomes to recombine is therefore urgently needed.Flavivirus virions are composed of a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome that, together with the capsid protein C, forms the viral nucleocapsid. The nucleocapsid is covered by a lipid envelope containing the surface glycoproteins prM and E. These glycoproteins drive budding at the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum during the assembly stage and mediate entry of the virus into host cells (41). Replicons, defined as self-replicating, noninfectious RNA molecules, can be generated by deleting parts or all of the region coding for the structural proteins C, prM, and E from the viral genome but maintaining all seven of the nonstructural proteins and the flanking noncoding sequences, which are required in cis for RNA replication (25). By providing the missing structural protein components in trans, replicons can be packaged into virus-like particles that are capable of a single round of infection (10, 15, 24, 47).Typically, researchers developing novel replicating vaccines, especially ones that involve multiple components, make an effort to come up with strategies to prevent recombination, for example by “wobbling” codons, i.e., replacing codons in homologous regions with synonymous ones encoding the same amino acid but consisting of a different nucleotide triplet (50, 57). In this study, in order to assess the propensity of flavivirus genomes to recombine, we took an opposite approach, establishing a “recombination trap” that favors the selection and sensitive detection of recombination products. This system takes advantage of the ability of replicon pairs containing deletions in their structural protein genes to complement each other in trans and thus be propagated together in cell culture, and by passage at limiting dilutions, it allows infectious RNA genomes arising by recombination between the two replicons to be preferentially selected.Using the recombination trap, we have now obtained the first direct evidence of recombination between flavivirus genomes in the laboratory. Aberrant homologous recombination was observed twice with JEV replicons, resulting in viruses with unnatural gene arrangements and reduced growth properties compared to those of wild-type JEV. No infectious recombinants of any kind were obtained when TBEV or WNV replicons were used. Interestingly, we never detected a fully infectious wild-type genome arising by homologous recombination in any of these systems. The results of this study show that the propensity of flavivirus genomes to recombine in the region coding for the structural proteins appears to be quite low, suggesting that recombination does not represent a major risk in the use of live, attenuated flavivirus vaccines.     

A Targeted Analysis of Cellular Chaperones Reveals Contrasting Roles for Heat Shock Protein 70 in Flock House Virus RNA Replication

Cytosolic chaperones are a diverse group of ubiquitous proteins that play central roles in multiple processes within the cell, including protein translation, folding, intracellular trafficking, and quality control. These cellular proteins have also been implicated in the replication of numerous viruses, although the full extent of their involvement in viral replication is unknown. We have previously shown that the heat shock protein 40 (hsp40) chaperone encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates RNA replication of flock house virus (FHV), a well-studied and versatile positive-sense RNA model virus. To further explore the roles of chaperones in FHV replication, we examined a panel of 30 yeast strains with single deletions of cytosolic proteins that have known or hypothesized chaperone activity. We found that the majority of cytosolic chaperone deletions had no impact on FHV RNA accumulation, with the notable exception of J-domain-containing hsp40 chaperones, where deletion of APJ1 reduced FHV RNA accumulation by 60%, while deletion of ZUO1, JJJ1, or JJJ2 markedly increased FHV RNA accumulation, by 4- to 40-fold. Further studies using cross complementation and double-deletion strains revealed that the contrasting effects of J domain proteins were reproduced by altering expression of the major cytosolic hsp70s encoded by the SSA and SSB families and were mediated in part by divergent effects on FHV RNA polymerase synthesis. These results identify hsp70 chaperones as critical regulators of FHV RNA replication and indicate that cellular chaperones can have both positive and negative regulatory effects on virus replication.The compact genomes of viruses relative to those of other infectious agents restrict their ability to encode all proteins required to complete their replication cycles. To circumvent this limitation, viruses often utilize cellular factors or processes to complete essential steps in replication. One group of cellular proteins frequently targeted by viruses are cellular chaperones, which include a diverse set of heat shock proteins (hsps) that normally facilitate cellular protein translation, folding, trafficking, and degradation (18, 64). The connection between viruses and cellular chaperones was originally identified in bacteria, where the Escherichia coli hsp40 and hsp70 homologues, encoded by dnaJ and dnaK, respectively, were identified as bacterial genes essential for bacteriophage λ DNA replication (62). Research over the past 30 years has further revealed the importance of cellular chaperones in viral replication, such that the list of virus-hsp connections is now quite extensive and includes viruses from numerous families with diverse genome structures (4, 6, 7, 16, 19, 20, 23, 25, 40, 41, 44, 51, 54, 60). These studies have demonstrated the importance of cellular chaperones in multiple steps of the viral life cycle, including entry, viral protein translation, genome replication, encapsidation, and virion release. However, the list of virus-hsp connections is likely incomplete. Further studies to explore this particular host-pathogen interaction will shed light on virus replication mechanisms and pathogenesis, and potentially highlight targets for novel antiviral agents.To study the role of cellular chaperones in the genome replication of positive-sense RNA viruses, we use flock house virus (FHV), a natural insect pathogen and well-studied member of the Nodaviridae family. The FHV life cycle shares many common features with other positive-sense RNA viruses, including the membrane-specific targeting and assembly of functional RNA replication complexes (37, 38), the exploitation of various cellular processes and host factors for viral replication (5, 23, 60), and the induction of large-scale membrane rearrangements (24, 28, 38, 39). FHV virions contain a copackaged bipartite genome consisting of RNA1 (3.1 kb) and RNA2 (1.4 kb), which encode protein A, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and the structural capsid protein precursor, respectively (1). During active genome replication, FHV produces a subgenomic RNA3 (0.4 kb), which encodes the RNA interference inhibitor protein B2 (12, 29, 32). These viral characteristics make FHV an excellent model system to study many aspects of positive-sense RNA virus biology.In addition to the benefits of a simple genome, FHV is able to establish robust RNA replication in a wide variety of genetically tractable eukaryotic hosts, including Drosophila melanogaster (38), Caenorhabditis elegans (32), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (46). The budding yeast S. cerevisiae has been an exceptionally useful model host to study the mechanisms of viral RNA replication complex assembly and function with FHV (31, 37, 39, 45, 53, 55, 56, 60) as well as other positive-sense RNA viruses (11). The facile genetics of S. cerevisiae, along with the vast array of well-defined cellular and molecular tools and techniques, make it an ideal eukaryotic host for the identification of cellular factors required for positive-sense RNA virus replication. Furthermore, readily available yeast libraries with deletions and regulated expression of individual proteins have led to the completion of several high-throughput screens to provide a global survey of host factors that impact virus replication (26, 42, 52). An alternative approach with these yeast libraries that reduces the inherently high false-negative rates associated with high-throughput screens is to focus on a select set of host genes associated with a particular cellular pathway, process, or location previously implicated in virus replication.We have utilized such a targeted approach and focused on examining the impact of cytosolic chaperones on FHV RNA replication. Previously, we have shown that the cellular chaperone hsp90 facilitates protein A synthesis in Drosophila cells (5, 23), and the hsp40 encoded by the yeast YDJ1 gene facilitates FHV RNA replication in yeast, in part through effects on both protein A accumulation and function (60). In this report, we further extend these observations by examining FHV RNA accumulation in a panel of yeast strains with deletions of known or hypothesized cytosolic chaperones. We demonstrate that cytosolic chaperones can have either suppressive or enhancing effects on FHV RNA accumulation. In particular, related hsp70 members encoded by the SSA and SSB yeast chaperone families have marked and dramatically divergent effects on both genomic and subgenomic RNA accumulation and viral polymerase synthesis. These results highlight the complexities of the host-pathogen interactions that influence positive-sense RNA virus replication and identify the hsp70 family of cytosolic chaperones as key regulators of FHV replication.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Intragenic Recombination as a Mechanism of Genetic Diversity in Bluetongue Virus

Bluetongue (BT), caused by Bluetongue virus (BTV), is an economically important disease affecting sheep, deer, cattle, and goats. Since 1998, a series of BT outbreaks have spread across much of southern and central Europe. To study why the epidemiology of the virus happens to change, it is important to fully know the mechanisms resulting in its genetic diversity. Gene mutation and segment reassortment have been considered as the key forces driving the evolution of BTV. However, it is still unknown whether intragenic recombination can occur and contribute to the process in the virus. We present here several BTV groups containing mosaic genes to reveal that intragenic recombination can take place between the virus strains and play a potential role in bringing novel BTV lineages.Bluetongue (BT) is an economically significant disease that seriously threatens sheep, some species of deer, and to a lesser extent cattle and goats. As a vector-borne viral disease of ruminants, BT is endemic in tropical and subtropical countries (46). However, a series of BT outbreaks have spread across much of southern and central Europe since 1998 (29). Thus, it is of great importance to fully understand the molecular basis driving the change of its epidemiology so as to prevent or limit future BT pandemics.Bluetongue virus (BTV), the pathogen of BT, belongs to the Orbivirus genus of the Reoviridae family (46). The virus has a segmented double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome that is packaged in a nonenveloped, icosahedral particle (46). Its 10 dsRNA segments encode 11 proteins, VP1 to VP7 (encoded by segments 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 7, respectively), NS1 to SN3 (encoded by segments 5, 8, and 10, respectively), and NS3A (encoded by segment 10) (46). Two structural proteins, VP2 and VP5, form the outer layer of the virion particle and are responsible for cell attachment and virus entry (18, 31, 32), neutralizing epitope (14, 21), and virus virulence (36). Both of them are highly variable and generate 24 serotypes of the virus (44). The inner layers contain VP1, VP3, VP4, VP6, and VP7, and form the “core” of the BTV capsid. VP1 and VP6 are involved in RNA replication as the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (54) and helicase/NTPase, respectively (49). VP7 forms the surface of the core and functions during the entry of the core into insect cells (44) and also can react with “core neutralizing” antibodies as a major serogroup-specific antigen (32, 44). These core proteins and two nonstructural proteins, NS1 and NS2, are thought to be relatively conservative, so that antigenic cross-reaction can take place between different BTV strains and serotypes, whereas NS3/N3a is more variable than the other nonstructural or core proteins (46).The genetic diversity and variation in sequences of different BTV genome segments were initially identified by RNA oligonucleotide fingerprint analysis of BTV field samples (47). Until now, reassortment and dynamic gene mutation, regarded as the key factors responsible for the genetic diversity of BTV, have been studied in details (46). The two mechanisms can result in both genetic drift and genetic shift and contribute to BTV evolution (47). It has been revealed that high-frequency genome segment reassortment occurs readily between different BTV serotypes (16). Thus, segment reassortment is an important factor in generation of genetic diversity in orbivirus populations in nature (45). In addition, it has been shown that homologous recombination can also play a role in the genetic diversity and evolution of some RNA viruses (24, 33) and bring on virulent variants of these viruses at last (8, 56). Although homologous recombination has been observed in rotavirus, a member of the Reoviridae (39, 40), it is still unknown whether the intragenic recombination can occur and play a role in the generation of genetic diversity in orbivirus populations.To determine whether homologous recombination shaped the evolution of BTV and to provide some insights into the recombination itself in the virus, we analyzed roughly 690 complete segments of BTV deposited in GenBank to see whether some of them underwent intragenic recombination event. Several BTV groups isolated at different time points and in different countries were found containing the same (or similar) mosaic segments, demonstrating that intragenic recombination had occurred in the field and that these viruses with mosaic segments had become prevailing strains. That is, intragenic recombination can play a potential role in generating genetic diversity of BTV and exert its influence on the change of BTV epidemiology.     

Characterization of Lassa Virus Glycoprotein Oligomerization and Influence of Cholesterol on Virus Replication

Mature glycoprotein spikes are inserted in the Lassa virus envelope and consist of the distal subunit GP-1, the transmembrane-spanning subunit GP-2, and the signal peptide, which originate from the precursor glycoprotein pre-GP-C by proteolytic processing. In this study, we analyzed the oligomeric structure of the viral surface glycoprotein. Chemical cross-linking studies of mature glycoprotein spikes from purified virus revealed the formation of trimers. Interestingly, sucrose density gradient analysis of cellularly expressed glycoprotein showed that in contrast to trimeric mature glycoprotein complexes, the noncleaved glycoprotein forms monomers and oligomers spanning a wide size range, indicating that maturation cleavage of GP by the cellular subtilase SKI-1/S1P is critical for formation of the correct oligomeric state. To shed light on a potential relation between cholesterol and GP trimer stability, we performed cholesterol depletion experiments. Although depletion of cholesterol had no effect on trimerization of the glycoprotein spike complex, our studies revealed that the cholesterol content of the viral envelope is important for the infectivity of Lassa virus. Analyses of the distribution of viral proteins in cholesterol-rich detergent-resistant membrane areas showed that Lassa virus buds from membrane areas other than those responsible for impaired infectivity due to cholesterol depletion of lipid rafts. Thus, derivation of the viral envelope from cholesterol-rich membrane areas is not a prerequisite for the impact of cholesterol on virus infectivity.Lassa virus (LASV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, of which Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is the prototype. Arenaviruses comprise more than 20 species, divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (19). The Old World arenaviruses include the human pathogenic LASV strains, Lujo virus, which was first identified in late 2008 and is associated with an unprecedented high case fatality rate in humans, the nonhuman pathogenic Ippy, Mobala, and Mopeia viruses, and the recently described Kodoko virus (10, 30, 49). The New World virus complex contains, among others, the South American hemorrhagic fever-causing viruses Junín virus, Machupo virus, Guanarito virus, Sabiá virus, and the recently discovered Chapare virus (22).Arenaviruses contain a bisegmented single-stranded RNA genome encoding the polymerase L, matrix protein Z, nucleoprotein NP, and glycoprotein GP. The bipartite ribonucleoprotein of LASV is surrounded by a lipid envelope derived from the plasma membrane of the host cell. The matrix protein Z has been identified as a major budding factor, which lines the interior of the viral lipid membrane, in which GP spikes are inserted (61, 75). The glycoprotein is synthesized as precursor protein pre-GP-C and is cotranslationally cleaved by signal peptidase into GP-C and the signal peptide, which exhibits unusual length, stability, and topology (3, 27, 28, 33, 70, 87). Moreover, the arenaviral signal peptide functions as trans-acting maturation factor (2, 26, 33). After processing by signal peptidase, GP-C of both New World and Old World arenaviruses is cleaved by the cellular subtilase subtilisin kexin isozyme-1/site-1 protease (SKI-1/S1P) into the distal subunit GP-1 and the membrane-anchored subunit GP-2 within the secretory pathway (5, 52, 63). For LCMV, it has been shown that GP-1 subunits are linked to each other by disulfide bonds and are noncovalently connected to GP-2 subunits (14, 24, 31). GP-1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor, while GP-2 mediates fusion between the virus envelope and the endosomal membrane at low pH due to a bipartite fusion peptide near the amino terminus (24, 36, 44). Sequence analysis of the LCMV GP-2 ectodomain revealed two heptad repeats that most likely form amphipathic helices important for this process (34, 86).In general, viral class I fusion proteins have triplets of α-helical structures in common, which contain heptad repeats (47, 73). In contrast, class II fusion proteins are characterized by β-sheets that form dimers in the prefusion status and trimers in the postfusion status (43). The class III fusion proteins are trimers that, unlike class I fusion proteins, were not proteolytically processed N-terminally of the fusion peptide, resulting in a fusion-active membrane-anchored subunit (39, 62). Previous studies with LCMV described a tetrameric organization of the glycoprotein spikes (14), while more recent data using a bacterially expressed truncated ectodomain of the LCMV GP-2 subunit pointed toward a trimeric spike structure (31). Due to these conflicting data regarding the oligomerization status of LCMV GP, it remains unclear to which class of fusion proteins the arenaviral glycoproteins belong.The state of oligomerization and the correct conformation of viral glycoproteins are crucial for membrane fusion during virus entry. The early steps of infection have been shown for several viruses to be dependent on the cholesterol content of the participating membranes (i.e., either the virus envelope or the host cell membrane) (4, 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, 40, 42, 53, 56, 76, 78, 79). In fact, it has been shown previously that entry of both LASV and LCMV is susceptible to cholesterol depletion of the target host cell membrane using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) treatment (64, 71). Moreover, cholesterol not only plays an important role in the early steps during entry in the viral life cycle but also is critical in the virus assembly and release process. Several viruses of various families, including influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), measles virus, and Ebola virus, use the ordered environment of lipid raft microdomains. Due to their high levels of glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, these domains are characterized by insolubility in nonionic detergents under cold conditions (60, 72). Recent observations have suggested that budding of the New World arenavirus Junin virus occurs from detergent-soluble membrane areas (1). Assembly and release from distinct membrane microdomains that are detergent soluble have also been described for vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (12, 38, 68). At present, however, it is not known whether LASV requires cholesterol in its viral envelope for successful virus entry or whether specific membrane microdomains are important for LASV assembly and release.In this study, we first investigated the oligomeric state of the premature and mature LASV glycoprotein complexes. Since it has been shown for several membrane proteins that the oligomerization and conformation are dependent on cholesterol (58, 59, 76, 78), we further analyzed the dependence of the cholesterol content of the virus envelope on glycoprotein oligomerization and virus infectivity. Finally, we characterized the lipid membrane areas from which LASV is released.     

Induction and Inhibition of Type I Interferon Responses by Distinct Components of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus

Type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in the host defense against viruses. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection induces robust type I IFN production in its natural host, the mouse. However, the mechanisms underlying the induction of type I IFNs in response to LCMV infection have not yet been clearly defined. In the present study, we demonstrate that IRF7 is required for both the early phase (day 1 postinfection) and the late phase (day 2 postinfection) of the type I IFN response to LCMV, and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)/mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) signaling is crucial for the late phase of the type I IFN response to LCMV. We further demonstrate that LCMV genomic RNA itself (without other LCMV components) is able to induce type I IFN responses in various cell types by activation of the RNA helicases retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and MDA5. We also show that expression of the LCMV nucleoprotein (NP) inhibits the type I IFN response induced by LCMV RNA and other RIG-I/MDA5 ligands. These virus-host interactions may play important roles in the pathogeneses of LCMV and other human arenavirus diseases.Type I interferons (IFNs), namely, alpha interferon (IFN-α) and IFN-β, are not only essential for host innate defense against viral pathogens but also critically modulate the development of virus-specific adaptive immune responses (6, 8, 28, 30, 36, 50, 61). The importance of type I IFNs in host defense has been demonstrated by studying mice deficient in the type I IFN receptor, which are highly susceptible to most viral pathogens (2, 47, 62).Recent studies have suggested that the production of type I IFNs is controlled by different innate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (19, 32, 55, 60). There are three major classes of PRRs, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (3, 40), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) (25, 48, 51), and nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (9, 22). TLRs are a group of transmembrane proteins expressed on either cell surfaces or endosomal compartments. RLRs localize in the cytosol. Both TLRs and RLRs are involved in detecting viral pathogens and controlling the production of type I IFNs (52, 60). In particular, the endosome-localized TLRs (TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9) play important roles in detecting virus-derived double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), and DNA-containing unmethylated CpG motifs, respectively. In contrast, RIG-I detects virus-derived ssRNA with 5′-triphosphates (5′-PPPs) or short dsRNA (<1 kb), whereas melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) is responsible for recognizing virus-derived long dsRNA as well as a synthetic mimic of viral dsRNA poly(I):poly(C) [poly(I·C)] (24, 60). Recognition of viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) ultimately leads to the activation and nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), which, in turn, switches on a cascade of genes controlling the production of both type I IFNs and other proinflammatory cytokines (10, 11, 60).Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection in its natural host, the mouse, is an excellent system to study the impact of virus-host interactions on viral pathogenesis and to address important issues related to human viral diseases (1, 45, 49, 67). LCMV infection induces type I IFNs as well as other proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines (6, 41). Our previous studies have demonstrated that TLR2, TLR6, and CD14 are involved in LCMV-induced proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines (66). The mechanism by which LCMV induces type I IFN responses, however, has not been clearly defined (7, 8, 31, 44). The role of the helicase family members RIG-I and MDA5 in virus-induced type I IFN responses has been recently established. RIG-I has been found to be critical in controlling the production of type I IFN in response to a number of RNA viruses, including influenza virus, rabies virus, Hantaan virus, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Sendai virus (SeV), etc. In contrast, MDA5 is required for responses to picornaviruses (15, 25, 63).In the present study, we demonstrated that LCMV genomic RNA strongly activates type I IFNs through a RIG-I/MDA5-dependent signaling pathway. Our present study further demonstrated that the LCMV nucleoprotein (NP) blocks LCMV RNA- and other viral ligand-induced type I IFN responses.