Functional and Spatial Regulation of Mitotic Centromere- Associated Kinesin by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1

Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) plays an essential role in spindle formation and in correction of improper microtubule-kinetochore attachments. The localization and activity of MCAK at the centromere/kinetochore are controlled by Aurora B kinase. However, MCAK is also abundant in the cytosol and at centrosomes during mitosis, and its regulatory mechanism at these sites is unknown. We show here that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) phosphorylates T537 in the core domain of MCAK and attenuates its microtubule-destabilizing activity in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of MCAK by Cdk1 promotes the release of MCAK from centrosomes and is required for proper spindle formation. Interfering with the regulation of MCAK by Cdk1 causes dramatic defects in spindle formation and in chromosome positioning. This is the first study demonstrating that Cdk1 regulates the localization and activity of MCAK in mitosis by directly phosphorylating the catalytic core domain of MCAK.Chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindles, and chromosome movement is tightly linked to the structure and dynamics of spindle microtubules during mitosis. Important regulators of microtubule dynamics are the kinesin-13 proteins (37). This kinesin superfamily is defined by the localization of the conserved kinesin core motor domain in the middle of the polypeptide (19). Kinesin-13 proteins induce microtubule depolymerization by disassembling tubulin subunits from the polymer end (6). Among them, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) is the best-characterized member of the family. It depolymerizes microtubules in vitro and in vivo, regulates microtubule dynamics, and has been implicated in correcting misaligned chromosomes (12, 14, 16, 24). In agreement with these observations, both overexpression and inhibition of MCAK result in a disruption of microtubule dynamics, leading further to improper spindle assembly and errors in chromosome alignment and segregation (7, 11, 15, 22, 33). The importance of MCAK in ensuring the faithful segregation of chromosomes is consistent with the observation that MCAK is highly expressed in several types of cancer and thus is likely to be involved in causing aneuploidy (25, 32).While MCAK is found both in the cytoplasm and at the centromeres throughout the cell cycle, it is highly enriched on centrosomes, the centromeres/kinetochores, and the spindle midzone during mitosis (18, 21, 36, 38). In accordance with its localizations, MCAK affects many aspects throughout mitosis, from spindle assembly and maintenance (3, 10, 36) to chromosome positioning and segregation (14, 21, 35). Thus, the precise control of the localization and activity of MCAK is crucial for maintaining genetic integrity during mitosis. Regulation of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores by Aurora B kinase in mitosis has been intensively investigated (1, 28, 29, 43). The data reveal that MCAK is phosphorylated on several serine/threonine residues by Aurora B, which inhibits the microtubule-destabilizing activity of MCAK and regulates its localization on chromosome arms/centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis (1, 18, 28). Moreover, in concert with Aurora B, ICIS (inner centromere KinI stimulator), a protein targeting the inner centromeres in an MCAK-dependent manner, may regulate MCAK at the inner centromeres and prevent kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors in mitosis by stimulating the activity of MCAK (27). Interestingly, hSgo2, a recently discovered inner centromere protein essential for centromere cohesion, has been reported to be important in localizing MCAK to the centromere and in spatially regulating its mitotic activity (13). These data highlight that the activity and localization of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis are tightly controlled by Aurora B and its cofactors. Remarkably, MCAK concentrates at spindle poles from prophase to telophase during mitosis (18); however, only a few studies have been done to deal with that issue. Aurora A-depleted prometaphase cells delocalize MCAK from spindle poles but accumulate the microtubule-stabilizing protein ch-TOG at poles (5), implying that Aurora A might influence the centrosomal localization of MCAK in mitosis. Aurora A is also found to be important for focusing microtubules at aster centers and for facilitating the transition from asters to bipolar spindles in Xenopus egg extracts (42). In addition, it has been revealed that Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II gamma (CaMKII gamma) suppresses MCAK''s activity, which is essential for bipolar spindle formation in mitosis (11). More work is required to gain insight into the regulatory mechanisms of MCAK at spindle poles during mitosis.Deregulated cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are very often linked to genomic and chromosomal instability (20). Cyclin B1, the regulatory subunit of Cdk1, is localized to unattached kinetochores and contributes to efficient microtubule attachment and proper chromosome alignment (2, 4). We observed that knockdown of cyclin B1 induces defects in chromosome alignment and mitotic spindle formation (N.-N. Kreis, M. Sanhaji, A. Krämer, K. Sommor, F. Rödel, K. Strebhardt, and J. Yuan, submitted for publication). Yet, how Cdk1/cyclin B1 carries out these functions is not very well understood. In this context, it is extremely interesting to investigate the relationship between the essential mitotic kinase Cdk1 and the microtubule depolymerase MCAK in human cells.     

Ric-8A and Giα Recruit LGN,NuMA, and Dynein to the Cell Cortex To Help Orient the Mitotic Spindle

In model organisms, resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8 (Ric-8), a G protein α (Gα) subunit guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), functions to orient mitotic spindles during asymmetric cell divisions; however, whether Ric-8A has any role in mammalian cell division is unknown. We show here that Ric-8A and Gα_i function to orient the metaphase mitotic spindle of mammalian adherent cells. During mitosis, Ric-8A localized at the cell cortex, spindle poles, centromeres, central spindle, and midbody. Pertussis toxin proved to be a useful tool in these studies since it blocked the binding of Ric-8A to Gα_i, thus preventing its GEF activity for Gα_i. Linking Ric-8A signaling to mammalian cell division, treatment of cells with pertussis toxin, reduction of Ric-8A expression, or decreased Gα_i expression similarly affected metaphase cells. Each treatment impaired the localization of LGN (GSPM2), NuMA (microtubule binding nuclear mitotic apparatus protein), and dynein at the metaphase cell cortex and disturbed integrin-dependent mitotic spindle orientation. Live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tubulin also revealed that reduced Ric-8A expression prolonged mitosis, caused occasional mitotic arrest, and decreased mitotic spindle movements. These data indicate that Ric-8A signaling leads to assembly of a cortical signaling complex that functions to orient the mitotic spindle.The cortical capture of astral microtubules is essential to generate the forces needed for mitotic spindle positioning for both symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions (23, 29). Failure to either capture astral microtubules or the inappropriate application of pulling forces adversely affects mitotic spindle orientation, and can impede embryogenesis and alter cell fate decisions. Studies examining mitotic spindle orientation in Drosophila embryonic and larval neuroblasts have identified two critical pathways, the Gα/Pins/Mud pathway and the Pins/Dlg/Khc73 pathway (29). The heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit (Gα), Pins (Partner-of-Inscuteable), and Mud (Mushroom body defect) are members of an evolutionarily conserved noncanonical G-protein signaling pathway, which form a tripartite protein complex linked to the apical Par complex by the adapter protein Inscuteable (29, 37). Reducing the level of Gα_i, Pins, or Mud prevents neuroblast mitotic spindle alignment. A second spindle orientation pathway involves Pins, the tumor suppressor Discs large (Dlg) and the microtubule plus-end-directed kinesin heavy chain 73 (Khc73). Khc73 binds Dlg and coimmunoprecipitates with Pins. Khc73 localized to astral microtubules can induce Pins-Dlg cortical polarity (27).In canonical G-protein signaling pathways, the binding of ligand to a seven-transmembrane receptor triggers a heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit (Gα) to exchange GTP for GDP, resulting in the dissociation of the Gα subunit from its associated Gβγ heterodimer (12, 20). This exposes interactive sites in the Gα and Gβγ subunits, allowing their binding to and activation of downstream effectors. Since Gα subunits possess an intrinsic GTPase activity, GTP hydrolysis leads to the reassembly of heterotrimeric G protein causing signaling to cease. In noncanonical G-protein signaling the seven-transmembrane receptor is replaced by an intracellular guanine nucleotide exchange factor, such as Ric-8 (37). In studies in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans Ric-8 has been shown to positively regulate Gα_i activity and is essential for asymmetric cell divisions (1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 36). Although initially characterized as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for isolated G_αsubunits, more recent biochemical studies have shown that Ric-8A (the mammalian equivalent of Ric-8) also acts on a complex of GDP-Gα_i, the mammalian Pins homolog LGN, and NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein; the mammalian equivalent of Mud) catalytically releasing GTP-Gα_i and causing liberation of NuMA from LGN (30, 31). Ric-8A can also catalyze guanine nucleotide exchange on Gα_i1 bound to the GPR/GoLoco exchange inhibitor AGS3, a paralog of LGN (33). During mitosis the N-terminal portion of LGN binds NuMA and the C-terminal domain binds GDP-Gα_i and the trimolecular complex localizes to the cell cortex, where the dynamic release of NuMA from LGN may regulate aster microtubule pulling during cell division (3, 9, 10, 22).In the present study we examined the role of Ric-8A in mitotic spindle orientation in adherent cells and in polarized MDCK cells. In nonpolarized adherent cells cell such as HeLa, integrin mediated cell-substrate adhesion orients the mitotic spindle parallel to the substratum, and thereby both daughter cells remain attached. This requires the actin cytoskeleton, astral microtubules, the microtubule plus end tracking protein EB1, myosin X, cdc42, LIM kinase 1, and phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP₃) (13, 18, 32, 34, 35). PIP₃ may direct dynein/dynactin-dependent pulling forces on the spindle midcortex to orient the mitotic spindle (34). In polarized cells such as Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, the mitotic spindle is constrained by the topology of the cell and cortical cues provided by adherens junctions (24). In contrast to HeLa cells these cues are insensitive to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition, which blocks the generation of PIP₃ (34). We found that inhibiting either Ric-8A or Gα_i expression impairs the orientation of the metaphase mitotic spindle in HeLa cells and pertussis toxin, which blocks Ric-8A triggered nucleotide exchange, disrupts the normal mitotic spindle alignment of both HeLa and MDCK cells. Impairment of Ric-8A expression or function inhibits the localization of Gα_i1, LGN, NuMA, and dynein to the metaphase cortex opposite the spindle poles.     

Aurora-A Kinase Is Essential for Bipolar Spindle Formation and Early Development

Aurora-A is a conserved kinase implicated in mitotic regulation and carcinogenesis. Aurora-A was previously implicated in mitotic entry and spindle assembly, although contradictory results prevented a clear understanding of the roles of Aurora-A in mammals. We developed a conditional null mutation in the mouse Aurora-A gene to investigate Aurora-A functions in primary cells ex vivo and in vivo. We show here that conditional Aurora-A ablation in cultured embryonic fibroblasts causes impaired mitotic entry and mitotic arrest with a profound defect in bipolar spindle formation. Germ line Aurora-A deficiency causes embryonic death at the blastocyst stage with pronounced cell proliferation failure, mitotic arrest, and monopolar spindle formation. Aurora-A deletion in mid-gestation embryos causes an increase in mitotic and apoptotic cells. These results indicate that murine Aurora-A facilitates, but is not absolutely required for, mitotic entry in murine embryonic fibroblasts and is essential for centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in vitro and in vivo. Aurora-A deletion increases apoptosis, suggesting that molecular therapies targeting Aurora-A may be effective in inducing tumor cell apoptosis. Aurora-A conditional mutant mice provide a valuable system for further defining Aurora-A functions and for predicting effects of Aurora-A therapeutic intervention.The equal partitioning of chromosomes at mitosis is critical for avoiding aneuploidy, a condition associated with spontaneous miscarriage, developmental disorders, and cancer (50). Mitosis requires coordinated completion of multiple events including nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome condensation and congression to the metaphase plate, centrosome separation, spindle formation, chromosome-spindle attachment and error correction, sister chromatid separation, and cytokinesis. Multiple regulators, many of which are kinases, are required to ensure that each event is completed in a timely fashion and in the proper order (reviewed in reference 46). Although a number of mitotic kinases have been identified, their targets and the intricacies of mitotic signal transduction pathways are just beginning to be understood.The Aurora kinases are key mitotic regulators in eukaryotes (reviewed in reference 45). The Aurora family includes a single member in yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ipl1p, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ark1), two members each in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, and two or three members in vertebrates. Although originally given a variety of names, Aurora kinases in multicellular eukaryotes have subsequently been classified into A, B, and C groups based on patterns of mitotic subcellular localization and homology, which also appear to reflect functional distinctions (8, 46). Aurora-A kinases are observed at centrosomes and adjacent spindle fibers, and current evidence supports key roles in regulating protein localization and function at centrosomes, as well as regulation of the assembly, stability, and function of the mitotic spindle (reviewed in reference 43). Aurora-B kinases display “chromosomal passenger” localization, residing on mitotic chromosomes and subsequently moving to the spindle midzone after separation of sister chromatids. Aurora-B family members have been implicated in the regulation of kinetochore-spindle attachment, the spindle checkpoint, and cytokinesis (reviewed in references 1 and 8). Aurora-C kinases, which have only been identified in mammals, have a limited expression pattern and appear to have functions that overlap those of Aurora-B (7, 53).The human Aurora-A kinase (hAurA) was first identified because of its overexpression in cancer cell lines (5, 58). The hAurA gene (stk15) resides on chromosome 20q13, a region frequently amplified in human cancers (5, 58). hAurA has been dubbed an oncogene because of the fact that its overexpression transforms immortalized rodent fibroblasts (5, 70). Polymorphisms in hAurA are associated with an increased risk of colon cancer, while murine AurA (mAurA) polymorphisms confer increased susceptibility to experimentally induced skin tumors (14). The mAurA gene is frequently amplified in radiation-induced lymphomas from p53 heterozygous mice, while loss of one mAurA allele has been observed in lymphomas from p53-null mice (41). Thus, aberrant AurA expression is associated with tumorigenesis, suggesting that insight into AurA functions will lead to a better understanding of tumorigenesis mechanisms.A number of experimental observations suggest that AurA kinases are required for normal centrosome maturation and bipolar spindle assembly. The AurA ortholog in Drosophila melanogaster (Aurora) was identified in a screen for mutations that impact the centrosome cycle (21). Syncytial embryos from hypomorphic Aurora mutant females display a variety of mitotic abnormalities resulting from a failure to separate centrosomes. Aurora-null flies die at the larval stage with characteristic monopolar spindles and circular chromosome arrays in larval neuroblasts. Such monopolar spindles arise from failed centrosome separation (21). Subsequent studies of Drosophila Aurora mutant alleles revealed additional defects in centrosome maturation (including a failure to localize transforming acidic coiled-coil protein, centrosomin, and γ-tubulin at centrosomes) and in asymmetric localization of Numb protein in sensory organ precursor cells (3, 17). Similar to the case in Drosophila, disruption of the C. elegans AurA ortholog AIR-1 by RNA interference (RNAi) or mutation causes defects in centrosome maturation and monopolar spindle formation. Centrosomes undergo normal separation but collapse, leading to monopolar spindle formation (16, 24, 56). Studies of the Xenopus AurA homolog pEg2 revealed similar phenotypes after overexpression of kinase-dead mutants, antibody-mediated inhibition, or immunodepletion (18, 19, 38, 52). Furthermore, Xenopus AurA has been shown to interact with and phosphorylate Eg5, a mitotic kinesin required for bipolar spindle formation, suggesting a possible mechanism by which AurA could influence bipolar spindle formation and/or stabilization (19). Thus, existing reports from these systems are quite consistent in implicating AurA in centrosome separation and function.In contrast to the systems described above, published reports of RNAi-mediated reduction of AurA expression in mammalian cell lines have contained conflicting results about the role of AurA in mitotic entry, bipolar spindle formation, and mitotic progression. AurA RNAi in HeLa cells was reported to block or delay mitotic entry, prompting the conclusion that AurA is essential for mitotic commitment in mammalian cells (27, 36). In contrast, other AurA RNAi studies showed accumulation of mitotic cells with monopolar spindles (12, 20, 67). These discrepancies call into question the functional conservation of AurA in mammals and highlight a need for additional studies to definitively address the roles of AurA. This is particularly critical for understanding the roles of AurA in cancer and for projecting possible effects of AurA inhibitors currently in development as anticancer agents. We used gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to produce a conditional null allele at the AurA locus. Here we describe cellular phenotypes of AurA deletion in primary cells in vitro and developmental phenotypes of AurA mutant mice. We show that AurA deletion in primary embryonic fibroblasts causes delayed mitotic entry with accumulation of cells in early prophase, consistent with a role for AurA in mitotic entry. Nevertheless, AurA-deficient cells that enter prometaphase arrest with monopolar spindles and eventually exit mitosis without segregating their chromosomes. Prolonged culture of AurA-deficient cells leads to polyploidy with abnormal nuclear structure. Germ line AurA deficiency causes embryonic death at the blastocyst stage with mitotic arrest and monopolar spindle formation, while AurA deletion in mid-gestation embryos causes an increased mitotic index and increased apoptosis. Together, our findings indicate that AurA is required for timely mitotic entry and bipolar spindle formation in vitro and in vivo.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Abrogation of the Postmitotic Checkpoint Contributes to Polyploidization in Human Papillomavirus E7-Expressing Cells

High-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are considered the major causative agents of cervical carcinoma. The transforming ability of HPV resides in the E6 and E7 oncogenes, yet the pathway to transformation is not well understood. Cells expressing the oncogene E7 from high-risk HPVs have a high incidence of polyploidy, which has been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and predisposes the cells to aneuploidy. The mechanism through which E7 contributes to polyploidy is not known. It has been hypothesized that E7 induces polyploidy in response to mitotic stress by abrogating the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. It was also proposed that E7 may stimulate rereplication to induce polyploidy. We have tested these hypotheses by using human epithelial cells in which E7 expression induces a significant amount of polyploidy. We find that E7-expressing cells undergo normal mitoses with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint and that they are able to complete cytokinesis. Our results also exclude DNA rereplication as a major mechanism of polyploidization in E7-expressing cells upon microtubule disruption. Instead, we have shown that while normal cells arrest at the postmitotic checkpoint after adaptation to the spindle assembly checkpoint, E7-expressing cells replicate their DNA and propagate as polyploid cells. Thus, abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint leads to polyploidy formation in E7-expressing human epithelial cells. Our results suggest that downregulation of pRb is important for E7 to induce polyploidy and abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint.An important hallmark of human cancers is aneuploidy, the state in which a cell has extra or missing chromosomes (12, 25). Polyploidy is the state in which cells have more than two equal sets of chromosomes and is thought to be an early event in multistep carcinogenesis that can lead to aneuploidy (1, 24), as exemplified in Barrett''s esophagus (11). Polyploidy has recently been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and to predispose the cells to aneuploidy (26). Other recent studies have shown that tetraploid but not diploid mouse or human cells induce tumor formation in mice (3, 9). These studies highlight the potential importance of polyploidy in carcinogenesis.The cellular mechanisms responsible for this polyploidy formation are as of yet undetermined, but several models have been proposed. First, abrogation of the spindle assembly checkpoint followed by cleavage failure may lead to polyploidy formation (36, 40). A second proposed model is rereplication, a process of multiple rounds of DNA replication without an intervening mitosis. Third, cells that adapt to the mitotic spindle checkpoint halt in a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content. Abrogation of this postmitotic checkpoint allows the cells to replicate their 4C DNA content, leading to polyploidy formation. This has been shown in cells that express the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) E6 oncogene that degrades p53 (21). Finally, cleavage failure, which yields binucleate cells with 4C DNA content, is also a potential mechanism for polyploidy formation (31).The postmitotic checkpoint becomes activated when cells with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint become arrested during mitosis for a prolonged period of time and eventually adapt to the checkpoint, exit mitosis without cleavage, and progress into a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content (19, 22). The cells are prevented from continuing through the cell cycle and replicating their DNA by a proposed p53- and pRb-dependent postmitotic checkpoint (18, 19).High-risk types of HPV (of which HPV-16 is the most prevalent) are commonly associated with lesions that can progress to cervical carcinoma, which is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women worldwide (42). The transforming properties of high-risk HPVs primarily reside in the E6 and E7 oncogenes (reviewed in reference 7). The ability of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 proteins to promote the degradation of p53 and pRb, respectively, has been suggested as a mechanism by which HPV induces cellular transformation (6, 30). Expression of the high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes in human keratinocytes leads to polyploidy, which is enhanced by DNA damage and by activation of the spindle checkpoint through microtubule disruption (15, 27, 37, 38).Previously, it was thought but not directly shown that high-risk E6 and E7 induce polyploidy in response to microtubule disruption by abrogating the spindle checkpoint and that degradation of the tumor suppressor p53 by E6 is the mechanism by which E6 accomplishes this polyploidy formation (27, 37, 38). Others have proposed that E7 may play a role in stimulating DNA rereplication that occurs prior to mitosis initiation and polyploidy formation (20). Our recent studies demonstrate that E6 does not affect the mitotic spindle checkpoint (21). Instead, E6 abrogates the postmitotic checkpoint to induce polyploidy after microtubule disruption. Interestingly, E6 mutant proteins defective in inducing p53 degradation also induce polyploidy (21). The mechanism by which HPV E7 induces polyploidy remains to be determined. In this study, we investigate these possible mechanisms through which HPV-16 E7 induces polyploidy formation.     

The Alternative TrkAIII Splice Variant Targets the Centrosome and Promotes Genetic Instability

The hypoxia-regulated alternative TrkAIII splice variant expressed by human neuroblastomas exhibits oncogenic potential, driven by in-frame exon 6 and 7 alternative splicing, leading to omission of the receptor extracellular immunoglobulin C₁ domain and several N-glycosylation sites. Here, we show that the TrkAIII oncogene promotes genetic instability by interacting with and exhibiting catalytic activity at the centrosome. This function depends upon intracellular TrkAIII accumulation and spontaneous interphase-restricted activation, in cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase (tk) domain orientation, predominantly within structures that closely associate with the fully assembled endoplasmic reticulum intermediate compartment and Golgi network. This facilitates TrkAIII tk-mediated binding of γ-tubulin, which is regulated by endogenous protein tyrosine phosphatases and geldanamycin-sensitive interaction with Hsp90, paving the way for TrkAIII recruitment to the centrosome. At the centrosome, TrkAIII differentially phosphorylates several centrosome-associated components, increases centrosome interaction with polo kinase 4, and decreases centrosome interaction with separase, the net results of which are centrosome amplification and increased genetic instability. The data characterize TrkAIII as a novel internal membrane-associated centrosome kinase, unveiling an important alternative mechanism to “classical” cell surface oncogenic receptor tk signaling through which stress-regulated alternative TrkAIII splicing influences the oncogenic process.Alternative splicing is fundamental for differential protein expression from the same gene and not only increases the proteomic complexity of higher organisms (29) but is also involved in cancer pathogenesis, activating several oncogenes and inactivating several oncosuppressors (17).The neurotrophin receptor tropomyosin-related kinase A (TrkA) is among the proto-oncogenes activated by alternative splicing, with a novel hypoxia-regulated oncogenic alternative TrkAIII splice variant recently identified in advanced-stage human neuroblastomas (NB) and primary glioblastomas (44, 45). In contrast to wild-type TrkAI/TrkAII, the expression of which is associated with better prognosis for NB, induces NB cell differentiation, exhibits a tumor suppressor function in NB models in vivo (9, 19, 22, 30, 44, 45), and may regulate both spontaneous and therapy-induced NB regression (30), TrkAIII is expressed by more-advanced-stage NB and exhibits oncogenic activity in NB models (44, 45). This has challenged the hypothesis of an exclusively tumor-suppressing function for TrkA in NB by providing a way through which tumor-suppressing signals from TrkA can be converted to oncogenic signals from TrkAIII during tumor progression.The oncogenic potential of TrkAIII, characterized by NIH 3T3 cell transforming and NB xenograft primary and metastatic tumor-promoting activity (44, 45), is driven by in-frame alternative splicing of exons 6 and 7. This results in the omission of the receptor extracellular immunoglobulin C₁ (Ig C₁) Ig-like domain and several N-glycosylation sites important in regulating TrkA cell surface expression and preventing ligand-independent activation (2, 44, 45, 48). As a consequence, and unlike TrkAI and TrkAII, TrkAIII is not expressed at the cell surface but accumulates in the intracellular membrane compartment, within which it exhibits spontaneous tyrosine kinase (tk) and phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) activity and induces chronic signaling through PI3K/Akt/NF-κB but not Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), inducing a more stress-resistant, angiogenic, and tumorigenic NB cell phenotype (44, 45). This differs from ligand-activated cell surface TrkA, which signals transiently through Ras/MAPK in NB cells to induce differentiation and a less angiogenic and tumorigenic NB cell phenotype (9, 19, 22, 30, 44, 45). This difference in signaling provides a potential basis for the opposing tumor-suppressing and oncogenic effects of alternative TrkA splice variants, which may not only depend upon the dislocation of TrkAIII from cell surface caveolae, which are the sites of TrkAI expression and Ras/MAPK signal initiation (45, 48), but also TrkAIII-associated PI3K activity below the Ras/MAPK activation threshold and/or TrkAIII-associated PI3K antagonism of Raf/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling (44). Signal transduction from intracellular TrkAIII bears close resemblance to the transient signaling through PI3K/Akt/NF-κB but not Ras/MAPK induced by A2a adenosine receptor/c-Src-mediated transactivation of immature TrkAI within the Golgi network (GN) (37), suggesting that the intracellular localization of TrkAIII is a critical determinant of both differential signaling and oncogenic potential.Intracellular nonnuclear membranes are separated into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER-GN intermediate compartment (ERGIC), GN, and transport vesicles, which assemble around, integrate, and interact with the centrosome (38). The centrosome, comprised of two centrioles embedded within a pericentriolar matrix of over 100 proteins, including γ-tubulin, acts as the major microtubule-organizing center and orchestrates the assembly, organization, and integration of the ER, ERGIC, GN, and associated vesicles (38). The centrosome also maintains genomic integrity by duplicating once per cell cycle S phase, ensuring bipolar mitotic spindle formation, accurate chromosome segregation, and the inheritance of a single centrosome by each daughter cell (23).Centrosome duplication is tightly regulated by protein kinases Aurora-A and -B, polo kinases 1 and 4 (Plk-1 and Plk-4), Cdk2, PI3K, Zyg-1, Syk, Nek2, regulators Pin-1 and separase, and related phosphatases (11, 12, 18, 31, 42, 47, 53). The deregulation of centrosome duplication leads to centrosome amplification and subsequently to aberrant mitotic spindle formation, which promotes aneuploidy and polyploidy. These manifestations of genetic instability represent hallmarks of malignancy and drive tumor progression by promoting a more malignant phenotype (11, 12, 26, 35, 49). Centrosome amplification and subsequent genetic instability are induced by kinases that target the centrosome, the loss of centrosome-associated kinase inhibitors, altered levels of centrosome-associated regulators, and oncosuppressor inactivation (6, 7, 11, 12, 35, 40, 42, 49, 53).The localization of TrkAIII to internal membranes, as a prerequisite for oncogenic activity (44, 45), makes identification of the membrane context within which TrkAIII exhibits activity and novel substrate interactions within this environment important in elucidating how TrkAIII exerts oncogenic potential. In the present study, we unveil a novel oncogenic mechanism for TrkAIII by demonstrating that TrkAIII activation within membranes that associate closely with the assembled ER/ERGIC/GN facilitates recruitment to the centrosome, results in centrosome amplification, and promotes genetic instability.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Serine Dephosphorylation of Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase α in Mitosis Induces Src Binding and Activation

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α (RPTPα) is the mitotic activator of the protein tyrosine kinase Src. RPTPα serine hyperphosphorylation was proposed to mediate mitotic activation of Src. We raised phosphospecific antibodies to the two main serine phosphorylation sites, and we discovered that RPTPα Ser204 was almost completely dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, whereas Ser180 and Tyr789 phosphorylation were only marginally reduced in mitosis. Concomitantly, Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 were dephosphorylated, resulting in 2.3-fold activation of Src in mitosis. Using inhibitors and knockdown experiments, we demonstrated that dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 in mitosis was mediated by PP2A. Mutation of Ser204 to Ala did not activate RPTPα, and intrinsic catalytic activity of RPTPα was not affected in mitosis. Interestingly, binding of endogenous Src to RPTPα was induced in mitosis. GRB2 binding to RPTPα, which was proposed to compete with Src binding to RPTPα, was only modestly reduced in mitosis, which could not account for enhanced Src binding. Moreover, we demonstrate that Src bound to mutant RPTPα-Y789F, lacking the GRB2 binding site, and mutant Src with an impaired Src homology 2 (SH2) domain bound to RPTPα, illustrating that Src binding to RPTPα is not mediated by a pTyr-SH2 interaction. Mutation of RPTPα Ser204 to Asp, mimicking phosphorylation, reduced coimmunoprecipitation with Src, suggesting that phosphorylation of Ser204 prohibits binding to Src. Based on our results, we propose a new model for mitotic activation of Src in which PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204 facilitates Src binding, leading to RPTPα-mediated dephosphorylation of Src pTyr527 and pTyr416 and hence modest activation of Src.Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are responsible for dephosphorylation of the phosphotyrosyl residues. The human genome contains approximately 100 genes that encode members of the four PTP families, and most of them have mouse orthologues (2, 48). According to their subcellular localization, the classical PTPs, encoded by less than half of the total PTP genes, are divided into two subfamilies: cytoplasmic and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs). The majority of the RPTPs contain, besides a variable extracellular domain and a transmembrane domain, two highly homologous phosphatase domains (27), with the membrane-proximal domain comprising most of the catalytic activity (33).RPTPα is a typical RPTP with a small, highly glycosylated extracellular domain (13). RPTPα function is regulated by many mechanisms, including proteolysis (18), oxidation (55), dimerization (7, 23, 24, 47, 52), and phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues (16, 17, 49). RPTPα is broadly expressed in many cell types, and over the years, RPTPα has been shown to be involved in a number of signaling mechanisms, including neuronal (15) and skeletal muscle (34) cell differentiation, neurite elongation (8, 9, 56), insulin receptor signaling downregulation (3, 28, 30, 31, 35), insulin secretion (25), activation of voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.2 (51), long-term potentiation in hippocampal neurons (32, 38), matrix-dependent force transduction (53), and cell spreading and migration (21, 45, 57).The majority of the roles played in these cellular processes involve RPTPα''s ability to activate the proto-oncogenes Src and Fyn by dephosphorylating their C-terminal inhibitory phosphotyrosine (5, 15, 39, 45, 61). Normally, this phosphotyrosine (pTyr527 in chicken Src) binds to the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, keeping the protein in an inactive closed conformation. A displacement mechanism was proposed for RPTPα-mediated Src activation in which pTyr789 of RPTPα is required to bind the SH2 domain of Src before RPTPα dephosphorylates Tyr527 (58). This model is the subject of debate since other studies show that RPTPα lacking Tyr789 is still able to dephosphorylate and activate Src (12, 26, 29, 56). In normal cells, Src reaches its activation peak during mitosis (4, 11, 40, 42), and with the help of overexpressing cells, it was shown that this activation is triggered mainly by RPTPα. The model that emerged is that RPTPα is activated in mitosis due to serine hyperphosphorylation and detaches from the GRB2 scaffolding protein (59, 60) that normally binds most of the pTyr789 of RPTPα via its SH2 domain (14, 17, 46). Two serine phosphorylation sites were mapped in the juxtamembrane domain of RPTPα, Ser180 and Ser204 (49). The kinases that were found responsible for their phosphorylation were protein kinase C delta (PKCdelta) (10) and CaMKIIalpha (9), but there is no clear evidence that these kinases are activated in mitosis. We set out to investigate the role of serine phosphorylation of RPTPα in mitotic activation of Src.We generated phosphospecific antibodies and show that RPTPα pSer204, but not pSer180, is dephosphorylated in mitotic NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells, concomitantly with activation of Src. Selective inhibitors suggested that PP2A was the phosphatase that dephosphorylated pSer204. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of the catalytic subunit of PP2A demonstrated that indeed PP2A was responsible for mitotic dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204. It is noteworthy that PP2A is known to be activated in mitosis. Intrinsic PTP activities of RPTPα were similar in unsynchronized and mitotic cells, and mutation of Ser204 did not activate RPTPα in in vitro PTP assays. Yet, Src binding to RPTPα was induced in mitotic NIH 3T3 cells and RPTPα-S204D with a phosphomimicking mutation at Ser204 coimmunoprecipitated less efficiently with Src. Based on our results, we propose a mechanism for mitotic activation of Src that is triggered by dephosphorylation of RPTPα pSer204, resulting in enhanced affinity for Src and subsequent dephosphorylation and activation of Src.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Safeguarding Entry into Mitosis: the Antephase Checkpoint

Maintenance of genomic stability is needed for cells to survive many rounds of division throughout their lifetime. Key to the proper inheritance of intact genome is the tight temporal and spatial coordination of cell cycle events. Moreover, checkpoints are present that function to monitor the proper execution of cell cycle processes. For instance, the DNA damage and spindle assembly checkpoints ensure genomic integrity by delaying cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA or spindle damage, respectively. A checkpoint that has recently been gaining attention is the antephase checkpoint that acts to prevent cells from entering mitosis in response to a range of stress agents. We review here what is known about the pathway that monitors the status of the cells at the brink of entry into mitosis when cells are exposed to insults that threaten the proper inheritance of chromosomes. We highlight issues which are unresolved in terms of our understanding of the antephase checkpoint and provide some perspectives on what lies ahead in the understanding of how the checkpoint functions.Segregation of sister chromosomes during the metaphase-to-anaphase transition is a dramatic event that results in the inheritance of a complete set of chromosomes by each daughter cell undergoing cell division. This process, which occurs during mitosis, requires the temporal and spatial coordination of a myriad of proteins. As many excellent reviews on the process of chromosome segregation have been published (9, 37, 84, 97, 136), we give here an overview of the process.In essence, duplicated chromosomes are condensed and then lined up at the metaphase plate, where the sister chromatids are subsequently pulled apart by microtubules attached to the kinetochores. The duplicated chromosomes are condensed by condensin I and II complexes that function to pack interphase chromatin so that it can then be neatly divided into daughter cells (6, 48, 50) (see below). Yet other protein complexes essential for ensuring genomic integrity during nuclear separation are the cohesins which maintain cohesion between sister chromatids (17, 85). The cohesins are loaded onto the duplicated chromosomes toward the end of mitosis in the preceding round of cell division or in late G₁/early S phase in the new round of cell division (9, 90, 111, 130). The presence of the cohesins helps keep the sister chromatids together until the kinetochores are correctly attached to spindle microtubules emanating from both microtubule-organizing centers (i.e., the spindle pole bodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the centrosomes in higher eukaryotes) in a process known as bi-orientation (122). Upon proper attachment of the mitotic spindles to the kinetochores, the sister chromatids separate as cohesins are destroyed through proteolysis by separase, a CD clan protease (129). Chromosome separation occurs as the spindle microtubules pull the chromosomes toward opposite ends of the dividing cells. This process of chromosome segregation is highly complex and requires tight regulation in order that genomic stability is maintained over successive rounds of cell division (1).In addition to the tight coordination of events during chromosome segregation, the genomic integrity of dividing cells is kept in check by the presence of checkpoints (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) that are needed to prevent the propagation of transformed cells (44). In mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in the surveillance of spindle integrity and elicits a delay in the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in the presence of spindle damage (83). The requirement for an intact spindle assembly checkpoint to maintain genomic integrity as cells undergo division is underscored by the correlations between mutations in the spindle assembly checkpoint genes and chromosome instability (15, 16, 72). Key players at the spindle assembly checkpoint include MAD2 and BUB1 (83).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Cell cycle checkpoint pathways impinging upon the cell division cycle. The cell division cycle is monitored throughout by various checkpoints, including the DNA replication (blue box) and DNA damage (red box) checkpoints, as well as the spindle assembly checkpoint (gray box). In addition, the antephase checkpoint (green box) plays an important role in preventing mitotic entry in the presence of various stress conditions (see text).Of late, interest has been gathering around a checkpoint that is presumably present in antephase and delays entry into mitosis. This checkpoint, named the “antephase checkpoint” by Matsusaka and Pines (71), is distinct from the G₂ checkpoints, which are activated in response to DNA damage (4, 5) and unreplicated DNA (100, 101). Also, a decatenation checkpoint that monitors the status of chromosome decatenation by topoisomerase II appears to act in a manner distinct from that of the antephase checkpoint (24). The antephase checkpoint has been proposed to function in response to a range of stress agents to delay entry into mitosis (97).In this review, we highlight the initial experiments which led to the idea of the existence of an antephase checkpoint which functions to prevent chromosome condensation, thereby safeguarding entry into mitosis in the presence of perturbations as cells prepare for chromosome condensation and segregation. We also review the players implicated in the checkpoint, such as CHFR (checkpoint with FHA and RING domains) (109) and p38 stress kinase (66), and discuss their roles in modulating the antephase checkpoint and the correlations between mutations or alterations in these genes with tumor formation. Lastly, we look at how the antephase checkpoint is likely to function, based on the current understanding of entry into mitosis and chromosome condensation.