Analysis of Modified Human Papillomavirus Type 16 L1 Capsomeres: the Ability To Assemble into Larger Particles Correlates with Higher Immunogenicity

L1 capsomeres purified from Escherichia coli represent an economic alternative to the recently launched virus-like particle (VLP)-based prophylactic vaccines against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (HPV-16 and HPV-18), which are causative agents of cervical cancer. It was recently reported that capsomeres are much less immunogenic than VLPs. Numerous modifications of the L1 protein leading to the formation of capsomeres but preventing capsid assembly have been described, such as the replacement of the cysteine residues that form capsid-stabilizing disulfide bonds or the deletion of helix 4. So far, the influence of these modifications on immunogenicity has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we describe the purification of eight different HPV-16 L1 proteins as capsomeres from Escherichia coli. We compared them for yield, structure, and immunogenicity in mice. All L1 proteins formed almost identical pentameric structures yet differed strongly in their immunogenicity, especially regarding the humoral immune responses. Immunization of TLR4^−/− mice and DNA immunization by the same constructs confirmed that immunogenicity was independent of different degrees of contamination with copurifying immune-stimulatory molecules from E. coli. We hypothesize that immunogenicity correlates with the intrinsic ability of the capsomeres to assemble into larger particles, as only assembly-competent L1 proteins induced high antibody responses. One of the proteins (L1ΔN10) proved to be the most immunogenic, inducing antibody titers equivalent to those generated in response to VLPs. However, preassembly prior to injection did not increase immunogenicity. Our data suggest that certain L1 constructs can be used to produce highly immunogenic capsomeres in bacteria as economic alternatives to VLP-based formulations.Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are the cause of cervical cancer, most frequently HPV types 16 and 18 (HPV-16 and HPV-18), which are responsible for about 50% and 20% of cases, respectively (8, 15, 16). Recently, two vaccines that prevent infection with HPV-16 and HPV-18 have been introduced to the market. These vaccines are based on the viral major structural protein L1, which can spontaneously self-assemble in vitro into empty virus-like particles (VLPs) that resemble the native virions in size and shape. VLPs have been shown to be highly immunogenic, as they can induce high titers of neutralizing antibodies (29, 30). HPV virions and VLPs consist of 72 L1 pentamers, also called capsomeres, which are arranged in an icosahedral T=7 particle lattice with a diameter of 55 nm. Cryo-electron microscopic analysis has revealed the presence of 60 hexavalent and 12 pentavalent capsomeres (4).Capsid assembly has been reported to be optimal at low pH (pH 5.4) and high ionic strength, whereas both high pH (pH 8.2) and the presence of reducing agents favor disassembly into capsomeres, the latter because the viral particles are stabilized by intercapsomeric disulfide bonds between two conserved cysteine residues at positions 175 and 428 (11, 35, 44). VLP formation is not affected by deletions of up to 9 amino acids (aa) from the N terminus and up to 34 aa from the C terminus of the L1 protein (11, 36). An N-terminally truncated L1 protein lacking 10 aa has been shown to assemble into particles consisting of 12 L1-pentamers with a T=1 lattice referred to as small VLPs (11, 12). Crystallographic analysis of the T=1 particles revealed that interpentameric contacts are established by hydrophobic interactions between the α-helices 2 and 3 of one capsomere and α-helix 4 of a neighboring capsomere (12). Consequently, a mutant L1 with helix 4 deleted formed homogenous capsomeres but failed in T=1 and T=7 particle assembly (7). Deletion of helices 2 and 3 impeded even pentamer formation, as a large fraction of the L1 protein was found to be insoluble, which suggests an essential role for these regions in L1 folding (7, 11).VLP-based prophylactic vaccines have been shown to induce high titers of neutralizing antibodies, which protect against virus challenge and associated diseases in humans (24, 31). However, due to the relatively high production and distribution costs of the vaccines—they are expressed in and purified from eukaryotic cells and require a cold chain for storage—they will probably be largely unavailable to developing countries, where more than 80% of all cervical cancer cases occur (1, 38, 46).L1 capsomeres represent a potentially lower cost alternative to VLPs, as they can be produced in large amounts from Escherichia coli and are considered more stable at room temperature (11, 34, 35). Capsomeres have been shown to induce high titers of neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses upon oral, intranasal, and subcutaneous immunization and have also protected against viral challenge in the canine oral papillomavirus model (18, 19, 37, 42, 48, 53). Most of the immunization data for HPV capsomeres have been obtained from administration of full-length or N-terminally deleted (10 aa) wild-type L1 proteins (18, 37, 53). A recent report in which the L1 pentamers were derived from an L1 protein in which the conserved cysteines (aa 175 and 428) were replaced by alanines revealed that HPV-16 VLPs induce about 20- to 40-fold-higher humoral immune responses than capsomeres (47). The influence on immunogenicity of the other mutations and deletions of the L1 protein that prevent capsid assembly has so far not been studied in depth.In a comparative analysis of eight differently modified HPV-16 L1 proteins purified as capsomeres from E. coli, we now report that their potential to induce humoral immune responses in mice correlates with their ability to assemble into particles larger than capsomeres. One of the constructs, L1ΔN10, encoded for capsomeres that exhibited immunogenicity similar to that of VLPs.     

Tissue-Spanning Redox Gradient-Dependent Assembly of Native Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Virions

Papillomavirus capsids are composed of 72 pentamers reinforced through inter- and intrapentameric disulfide bonds. Recent research suggests that virus-like particles and pseudovirions (PsV) can undergo a redox-dependent conformational change involving disulfide interactions. We present here evidence that native virions exploit a tissue-spanning redox gradient that facilitates assembly events in the context of the complete papillomavirus life cycle. DNA encapsidation and infectivity titers are redox dependent in that they can be temporally modulated via treatment of organotypic cultures with oxidized glutathione. These data provide evidence that papillomavirus assembly and maturation is redox-dependent, utilizing multiple steps within both suprabasal and cornified layers.Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) exclusively infect cutaneous or mucosal epithelial tissues (14, 15, 30). HPV types that infect the mucosal epithelia can lead to the development of benign or malignant neoplasms, thus allowing for their categorization into low-risk or high-risk HPV types, respectively (14, 15, 30). A small subset of the more than 200 HPV types now identified are the causative agents of over 75% of all cervical cancers. HPV16 is the most prevalent type worldwide, found in ca. 50 to 62% of squamous cell carcinomas (14, 50).HPV16 virions contain a single, circular double-stranded DNA genome of ∼8 kb which associates with histones to form a chromatin-like structure. This minichromosome is packaged within a nonenveloped, icosahedral capsid composed of the major capsid protein L1 and the minor capsid protein L2. Similar to polyomaviruses, 72 capsomeres of L1 are geometrically arranged on a T=7 icosahedral lattice (2, 9, 17, 19, 36, 42). Recent cryoelectron microscopy images of HPV16 pseudovirions (PsV) suggest that L2 is arranged near the inner conical hollow of each L1 pentamer, although it is not known whether each L1 pentamer is occupied with a single L2 protein (5, 42).Due to technical constraints in the production of native HPV virions in organotypic culture, assembly studies of HPV particles have largely been restricted to the utilization of in vitro-derived particles such as virus-like particles (VLPs), PsV, and quasivirions (QV) (6, 12, 25, 40, 43). Recent research suggests that HPV and bovine papillomavirus PsV can undergo a redox-dependent conformational change that takes place over the course of many hours. This conformational change is characterized by resistance to proteolysis and chemical reduction and the appearance of a more orderly capsid structure via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (7, 20).We present evidence that native virions, in the context of the complete papillomavirus life cycle, utilize a tissue-spanning redox gradient that facilitates multiple redox-dependent assembly and maturation events over the course of many days. We show that stability and specific infectivity of 20-day virions increases over 10-day virions, 20-day virions are more susceptible to neutralization than 10-day virions, and both viral DNA encapsidation and infectivity of HPV-infected tissues are redox dependent in that they can be manipulated via the treatment of organotypic tissues with oxidized glutathione (GSSG), which is concentration and temporally dependent.     

Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Infection of Human Keratinocytes Requires Clathrin and Caveolin-1 and Is Brefeldin A Sensitive

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) has been identified as being the most common etiological agent leading to cervical cancer. Despite having a clear understanding of the role of HPV16 in oncogenesis, details of how HPV16 traffics during infection are poorly understood. HPV16 has been determined to enter via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, but the subsequent steps of HPV16 infection remain unclear. There is emerging evidence that several viruses take advantage of cross talk between routes of endocytosis. Specifically, JCV and bovine papillomavirus type 1 have been shown to enter cells by clathrin-dependent endocytosis and then require caveolin-1-mediated trafficking for infection. In this paper, we show that HPV16 is dependent on caveolin-1 after clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We provide evidence for the first time that HPV16 infection is dependent on trafficking to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This novel trafficking may explain the requirement for the caveolar pathway in HPV16 infection because clathrin-mediated endocytosis typically does not lead to the ER. Our data indicate that the infectious route for HPV16 following clathrin-mediated entry is caveolin-1 and COPI dependent. An understanding of the steps involved in HPV16 sorting and trafficking opens up the possibility of developing novel approaches to interfere with HPV16 infection and reduce the burden of papillomavirus diseases including cervical cancer.Human papillomavirus (PV) type 16 (HPV16) is a member of the family Papillomaviridae, a group of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses with a tropism for squamous epithelia (70). Most PV infections result in benign lesions, although a subset of high-risk HPVs are capable of malignant transformation, resulting in various cancers including cervical carcinoma (21, 38). Infection with HPV16 is responsible for causing approximately half of the cases of invasive cervical cancer (7). In spite of the link between HPV16 and cervical cancer, the intracellular movement of HPV16 through target keratinocyte cells during infection has not been defined in detail.Viruses can enter into target cells by taking advantage of the cell''s natural endocytosis machinery (60). One of the best-characterized modes of internalization is by receptor-mediated, clathrin-dependent endocytosis. In this mode of entry, clathrin-coated pits internalize cargo into clathrin-coated vesicles, which are pinched from the plasma membrane by dynamin-2 in order to internalize (68). The process of clathrin-mediated endocytosis occurs rapidly, resulting in the delivery of cargo to early/sorting endosomes within seconds to minutes (23, 31). From the sorting endosome, most clathrin-dependent ligands are trafficked back to the plasma membrane in recycling endosomes or to lysosomes for degradation (35, 56). Another well-studied model of ligand entry is caveolin-1-mediated endocytosis. The caveolar pathway typically involves entry via cholesterol-rich caveolae at the plasma membrane, which deliver their contents to pH-neutral organelles known as caveosomes (44, 65). The delivery of cargo from caveosomes to the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was demonstrated previously (44, 46, 50). The traffickings of cargo internalized via clathrin- and caveolin-1-mediated endocytosis were once thought to be separate; however, it is becoming evident that viruses including bovine PV type 1 (BPV1), JCV, HPV31, and BKV rely on both pathways depending on the stage of infection (29, 32, 50, 63).PV internalization is preceded by virion attachment to the extracellular matrix, followed by binding to heparan sulfate (14, 15, 25). The involvement of a secondary receptor has been suggested, putatively an alpha-6 integrin (24, 37). Postbinding, a conformational change in the PV capsid results in a furin cleavage event at the N terminus of the minor capsid protein L2, which has been suggested to play a role in the endosomal escape of the viral genome (19, 30, 52). An increasing body of evidence supports the entry of HPV16 by clathrin-mediated endocytosis (9, 27, 62). Electron microscopy of HPV16 infection in COS-7 cells demonstrated HPV16 pseudovirions in clathrin-coated vesicles 20 min after entry and within structures resembling endosomes by 1 h postentry (9). HPV16 infection of HaCaT keratinocyte, COS-7, and 293TT cells has been blocked by chlorpromazine, an inhibitor of the formation of clathrin-coated pits (9, 27, 62, 67). Importantly, those studies showed that two inhibitors of caveolin-1-mediated internalization, filipin and nystatin, did not interfere with HPV16 infection (9, 27, 62). Our laboratory demonstrated the importance of dynamin in HPV16 infection, presumably in the scission of clathrin-coated vesicles from the plasma membrane (1). Recently, a clathrin-, caveolin-, and dynamin-independent endocytosis of HPV16 was suggested, although the use of the HPV18-positive, heteroploid HeLa cell line calls into question the relevance of this finding to natural infection (64).In a previous study, we described the postentry trafficking of BPV1 from endosomes to caveolin-1-positive vesicles, similarly to a related nonenveloped dsDNA virus, JCV (32, 50). Our data demonstrated that the infectious route of BPV1 involved entry by clathrin-mediated endocytosis followed by transport to the caveolar pathway in order to traffic to the ER (32). We found that BPV1 infection was neutralized by an antibody that prevented viral particle transport to the ER (33). The movement of BPV1 from the endosome to the caveosome provides a possible explanation for why BPV1 trafficking is so slow compared to those of other ligands of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (20, 26). The kinetics of BPV1 and HPV16 entry were previously reported to be identical, and the coincident internalization of HPV16 and BPV1 virus-like particles (VLPs) showed colocalization between the VLPs during infection (20, 62). These data suggest that HPV16 and BPV1 infection may be occurring by a similar mechanism.Our goal in the present study was to determine the intracellular trafficking events leading to HPV16 infection. The use of reporter virion technology has allowed the production of high-titer HPV16 virions by a method previously shown to yield virions that are infectious in vivo (16). In this study, we used HPV16 reporter virions to study HPV16 infection in the spontaneously immortalized human HaCaT keratinocyte cell line. Our data show that the infectious route of HPV16 is from early endosomes to caveolin-1-positive vesicles and then to the ER. Using immunofluorescence and short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against caveolin-1, we demonstrate the importance of the caveolar pathway after HPV16 has been internalized. We show that HPV16 infection was blocked by inhibiting the formation of COPI transport vesicles, which function in trafficking between the ER and the Golgi apparatus and from caveosomes to the ER (5, 39). We provide evidence that after reaching the caveosome, HPV16 requires passage to the ER for successful infection, a trafficking event made possible by COPI vesicle-mediated movement from the caveosome to the ER.     

The Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E5 Oncoprotein Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Trafficking Independently of Endosome Acidification

The human papillomavirus type 16 E5 oncoprotein (16E5) enhances acute, ligand-dependent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and concomitantly alkalinizes endosomes, presumably by binding to the 16-kDa “c” subunit of the V-ATPase proton pump (16K) and inhibiting V-ATPase function. However, the relationship between 16K binding, endosome alkalinization, and altered EGFR signaling remains unclear. Using an antibody that we generated against 16K, we found that 16E5 associated with only a small fraction of endogenous 16K in keratinocytes, suggesting that it was unlikely that E5 could significantly affect V-ATPase function by direct inhibition. Nevertheless, E5 inhibited the acidification of endosomes, as determined by a new assay using a biologically active, pH-sensitive fluorescent EGF conjugate. Since we also found that 16E5 did not alter cell surface EGF binding, the number of EGFRs on the cell surface, or the endocytosis of prebound EGF, we postulated that it might be blocking the fusion of early endosomes with acidified vesicles. Our studies with pH-sensitive and -insensitive fluorescent EGF conjugates and fluorescent dextran confirmed that E5 prevented endosome maturation (acidification and enlargement) by inhibiting endosome fusion. The E5-dependent defect in vesicle fusion was not due to detectable disruption of actin, tubulin, vimentin, or cytokeratin filaments, suggesting that membrane fusion was being directly affected rather than vesicle transport. Perhaps most importantly, while bafilomycin A₁ (like E5) binds to 16K and inhibits endosome acidification, it did not mimic the ability of E5 to inhibit endosome enlargement or the trafficking of EGF. Thus, 16E5 alters EGF endocytic trafficking via a pH-independent inhibition of vesicle fusion.High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the causative agent of cervical cancer (63) and HPV type 16 (HPV-16) is associated with a majority of cervical malignancies worldwide (13). HPV-16 encodes three oncoproteins: E5, E6, and E7. While the contributions of E6 and E7 to cellular immortalization and transformation have been characterized in detail (20), the role of HPV-16 E5 (16E5) is poorly understood (53). Nevertheless, a number of studies suggest that 16E5 does contribute to the development of cervical cancer. Most high-risk HPV types encode an E5 protein (48), and targeted expression of the three HPV-16 oncogenes in basal epithelial cells of transgenic mice (4) leads to a higher incidence of cervical cancer than does the expression of E6 and E7 alone (44). In addition, targeted epithelial expression of 16E5 (without E6 and E7) in transgenic mice induces skin tumors (21). It may be noteworthy that unlike high-risk HPV-18, which integrates into the host DNA and potentially disrupts E5 gene expression (20, 64), the HPV-16 genome often persists in episomal form in malignant lesions (12, 16, 24, 36, 42).Biological activities of 16E5 that may facilitate carcinogenesis include evading host immune detection by interfering with the transport of antigen-presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules to the cell surface (6), promoting anchorage-independent growth (33, 41, 52) and disrupting gap junctions responsible for cell-cell communication (37, 58). The 16E5 phenotype most frequently linked to the development of cancer is enhanced ligand-dependent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (15, 41, 46, 52). 16E5 stimulates EGF-dependent cell proliferation in vitro (7, 33, 40, 41, 52, 60) and in vivo (21), which might expand the population of basal or stemlike keratinocytes and thereby increase the probability that some of these cells would undergo malignant transformation. A number of studies indicate that 16E5 may enhance ligand-dependent EGFR activation by interfering with the acidification of early endosomes containing EGF bound to activated EGFRs (17, 51, 57). It has been hypothesized that 16E5 inhibits the H⁺ V-ATPase responsible for maintaining an acidic luminal pH in late endosomes and lysosomes (28) by associating with the V-ATPase 16-kDa “c” subunit (16K) (1, 5, 14, 22, 46) and disrupting assembly of the V-ATPase integral (V_o) and peripheral (V_i) subcomplexes (10). In contrast, Thomsen et al. (57) reported that 16E5 inhibits early endosome trafficking in fibroblasts by completely depolymerizing actin microfilaments.Due to the unavailability of antibodies that recognize native 16E5 and 16K, direct association of 16E5 with 16K has only been observed by overexpressing epitope-tagged forms of both proteins in vitro (5, 46) or in vivo (1, 14, 22). It is uncertain, therefore, whether these associations occur when the proteins are expressed at “physiological” levels. In yeast, both wild-type 16E5 (10) and several 16E5 mutants that associate with 16K in COS cells (1) inhibit vacuolar acidification, although another study in yeast concludes the opposite (5). 16K is a component of the V-ATPase V_o subcomplex, which is assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (28), and 16E5 localizes to the ER and nuclear envelope in epithelial cells (32, 54). Thus, the export of V_o from the ER could potentially be inhibited by a significant level of 16K binding to 16E5, although the differential alkalinization of endosomes rather than the Golgi apparatus (17) would require specificity for those proton pumps directed to those sites.In the present study, we generated an antibody against native 16K and used it to determine whether 16K/16E5 complexes formed in primary keratinocytes. We also synthesized a new pH-sensitive fluorescent EGF conjugate to evaluate whether there was a correlation between E5-induced EGFR activation, trafficking and endosome alkalinization. Finally, we simultaneously monitored EGFR endocytic trafficking (using pH-insensitive fluorescent EGF), endosome fusion (using fluorescent EGF and dextran), and the status of cellular filaments and microtubules to evaluate whether E5 might disrupt some of these structures that mediate vesicle transport.     

Membrane Orientation of the Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E5 Oncoprotein

The E5 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 is a small, hydrophobic protein that localizes predominantly to membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). To define the orientation of E5 in these membranes, we employed a differential, detergent permeabilization technique that makes use of the ability of low concentrations of digitonin to selectively permeabilize the plasma membrane and saponin to permeabilize all cellular membranes. We then generated a biologically active E5 protein that was epitope tagged at both its N and C termini and determined the accessibility of these termini to antibodies in the presence and absence of detergents. In both COS cells and human ectocervical cells, the C terminus of E5 was exposed to the cytoplasm, whereas the N terminus was restricted to the lumen of the ER. Finally, the deletion of the E5 third transmembrane domain (and terminal hydrophilic amino acids) resulted in a protein with its C terminus in the ER lumen. Taken together, these topology findings are compatible with a model of E5 being a 3-pass transmembrane protein and with studies demonstrating its C terminus interacting with cytoplasmic proteins.Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small, nonenveloped, double-stranded DNA viruses (25) that are the causative agents of benign and malignant tumors in humans (43). Most cancers of the cervix, vagina, and anus are caused by HPVs, as are a fraction of oropharyngeal cancers (29, 44). HPV type 16 (HPV-16) is the type most frequently found in anogenital cancers (15, 29), including cervical cancer, the most common cancer of women worldwide (44).Some of the biological activities of the HPV-16 E5 protein (16E5) include the augmentation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling pathways (8), stimulation of anchorage-independent growth (38), alkalinization of endosomal pH (11), and alteration of membrane lipid composition (39). 16E5 also exhibits weak transforming activity in vitro (12), induces epithelial tumors in transgenic mice (13), and plays an important role in koilocytosis (20). There are multiple documented intracellular binding targets for 16E5 such as the 16-kDa subunit of the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase (7, 36), the heavy chain of HLA type I (1), EGF receptor family member ErbB4 (6), calnexin (16), the zinc transporter ZnT-1 (21), the EVER1 and EVER2 transmembrane channel-like proteins that modulate zinc homeostasis (21, 31), the nuclear import receptor family member karyopherin β3 (KNβ3) (19), and BAP31, which was previously reported to contribute to B-cell receptor activation (35).16E5 is a small, hydrophobic protein that localizes to intracellular membranes. When overexpressed in COS cells, it is present in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and, to a lesser extent, in the Golgi apparatus (7). At a lower level of expression in human foreskin keratinocytes and human ectocervical cells (HECs), 16E5 is present predominantly in the ER (10, 39). 16E5 contains three hydrophobic regions (14, 16, 22, 30, 41), and it was reported previously that the first hydrophobic region determines various biological properties of the protein (16, 22). It was also shown previously that the 16E5 C terminus plays a role in binding to karyopherin β3 (19) and in the formation of koilocytes (20). While theoretical predictions have been made for the topology of E5 in membranes (16), no experimental data exist. However, a recent study suggested that some highly expressed 16E5 localizes to the plasma membrane, with its C terminus exposed externally (18).The aim of the present study was to establish the orientation of 16E5 in the ER membrane. By using immunofluorescence microscopy coupled with differential membrane permeabilization (24, 34), we demonstrate the membrane orientation of an N- and C-terminally tagged, biologically active 16E5 protein. Our results indicate that the N terminus is intralumenal and that the C terminus is cytoplasmic, consistent with a model of E5 being a three-pass transmembrane protein and with current data on the interaction of its C terminus with cytoplasmic proteins.     

The Canine Papillomavirus E5 Protein Signals from the Endoplasmic Reticulum

The recently discovered Canis familiaris papillomavirus (PV) type 2 (CfPV2) provides a unique opportunity to study PV gene functions in vitro and in vivo. Unlike the previously characterized canine oral PV, CfPV2 contains an E5 open reading frame and is associated with progression to squamous cell carcinoma. In the current study, we have expressed and characterized the CfPV2-encoded E5 protein, a small, hydrophobic, 41-amino-acid polypeptide. We demonstrate that, similar to the E5 protein from high-risk human PV type 16, the CfPV2 E5 protein is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and that its expression decreases keratinocyte proliferation and cell life span. E5 expression also increases the percentage of cells in the G₁ phase of the cell cycle, with a concomitant decrease in the percentage of cells in S phase. To identify a potential mechanism for E5-mediated growth inhibition from the ER, we developed a real-time PCR method to quantify the splicing of XBP1 mRNA as a measure of ER stress. We found that the CfPV2 E5 protein induced ER stress and that this, as well as the observed growth inhibition, is tempered significantly by coexpression of the CfPV2 E6 and E7 genes. It is possible that the spatial/temporal regulation of E6/E7 gene expression during keratinocyte differentiation might therefore modulate E5 activity and ER stress.Papillomaviruses (PVs) are a large group of DNA tumor viruses that infect differentiated cutaneous and mucosal epithelia in a wide variety of mammalian species. There are nearly 200 types of human PVs (HPVs) (61), some of which are termed high risk (e.g., HPV type 16 [HPV-16]) and have the potential to immortalize primary cells and facilitate malignant progression to cervical cancer (52). An estimated 20 million cases of HPV infection occur each year in the United States alone, and cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among women worldwide. In general, PV infections are species specific, making it impossible to study the in vivo life cycle of HPV and the roles of its encoded proteins in viral replication and tumorigenesis. However, a few animal models do exist and the canine oral PV (COPV) has been helpful in mimicking certain biological properties of the high-risk mucosatropic HPVs, leading to the development of highly effective prophylactic vaccines (39, 49, 56). Although COPV mimics the mucosal tropism of the high-risk HPVs, it rarely progresses to cancer and lacks one of the early viral genes that may play an important role in tumorigenesis, E5. Recently, a new canine PV (Canis familiaris PV type 2 [CfPV2]) was isolated from the footpads of dogs (43). Unlike COPV, CfPV2 induces epidermal tumors and, when persistent, these benign infections progress to squamous cell carcinoma and metastasize widely. CfPV2 also encodes an E5 protein. In general, PV E5 proteins are small hydrophobic oncoproteins that localize to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or Golgi membranes (11, 16) but have limited amino acid sequence homology. Numerous cellular binding partners have been described for HPV-16 E5 proteins, including the V-ATPase 16-kDa subunit (1, 16), the nuclear import protein karyopherin beta 3 (25), the ER-resident protein Bap31 (40), proteins involved in zinc transport (ZnT1, EVER1, and EVER2) (27, 35), erbB4 (24), and HLA I (2). The HPV-16 E5 protein alters signaling pathways, predominantly the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway (17, 21, 46, 58); induces koilocytosis in cooperation with the E6 protein (26); and alters the plasma membrane expression of caveolin (47), HLA (3), and ganglioside GM1 (47). The last two changes might explain the ability of HPV-16-infected cells to circumvent detection by the host immune response and initiate tumor formation (3, 4, 21, 36, 46, 47).To provide a foundation for future in vivo studies, we initiated a series of in vitro experiments to define the intracellular localization and biological activity of CfPV2 E5. The current study demonstrates that CfPV2 E5 exhibits several properties of the HPV-16 E5 protein, including ER localization and inhibition of cell proliferation. A novel finding is that CfPV2 E5 activates the ER stress-signaling pathway, which may explain some of E5''s growth-related activities.     

The Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase USP15 Regulates Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 Protein Stability

Proteomic identification of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6-interacting proteins revealed several proteins involved in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. In addition to the well-characterized E6AP ubiquitin-protein ligase, a second HECT domain protein (HERC2) and a deubiquitylating enzyme (USP15) were identified by tandem affinity purification of HPV16 E6-associated proteins. This study focuses on the functional consequences of the interaction of E6 with USP15. Overexpression of USP15 resulted in increased levels of the E6 protein, and the small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of USP15 decreased E6 protein levels. These results implicate USP15 directly in the regulation of E6 protein stability and suggest that ubiquitylated E6 could be a substrate for USP15 ubiquitin peptidase activity. It remains possible that E6 could affect the activity of USP15 on specific cellular substrates, a hypothesis that can be tested as more is learned about the substrates and pathways controlled by USP15.Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are associated with several human cancers, most notably human cervical cancer, the second most common cancer among women worldwide (43). Papillomaviruses cause proliferative squamous epithelial lesions, and more than 100 HPV types have been described (14). The HPV types associated with mucosal squamous epithelial lesions have been further classified into high- or low-risk types based on the propensity for the lesions with which they are associated to progress to cancer. Among the high-risk HPV types, HPV type 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 account for approximately 70% of cervical cancers (43). The high-risk HPV types carry two genes, the E6 and E7 genes, which have oncogenic properties and are always expressed in HPV-positive cancers. E6 and E7 interfere with the p53 and retinoblastoma (pRB) tumor suppressor pathways, respectively, and contribute directly to cell cycle alterations, protection from apoptosis, and transformation (14). The dysregulated expression of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins is an important step in the progression from a preneoplastic stage to cancer in HPV-infected cells and is often a consequence of the integration of the viral genome into the host chromosome.The interaction between E6 and p53 is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase E6AP (15). E6, p53, and E6AP form a complex in which E6 directs the ligase activity of E6AP to p53, thereby targeting p53 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation (36). E6, however, has a number of other cellular partners and other functions. For instance, the C terminus of the high-risk E6 protein contains a PDZ binding motif (20, 25) that mediates the interaction with several PDZ domain-containing proteins, including discs large (Dlg), Scribble (Scrib), the MAGI family of proteins, MUPP1, and PATJ (9, 10, 29). Some of these proteins are also targeted for degradation in an E6AP-dependent manner (22, 29). While the major mechanism of oncogenesis revolves around E6''s ability to inhibit the proapoptotic effects of p53, recent work involving the PDZ domain proteins indicates that these interactions are also important to the oncogenic potential of E6 (38, 41). Furthermore, E6 has been reported to bind a number of other cellular proteins, including but not limited to Bak, CBP/p300, c-Myc, E6TP1, hADA3, IRF3, MCM7, PTPH1, and TNF-R1 (7, 8, 17, 23, 24, 32, 35, 39, 40). The importance of the binding of several of these proteins with regard to the transformation or other functions of E6 remains to be established. E6 itself is thought to be targeted for degradation by an ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (18), although how E6 protein stability is regulated has not been well studied.Many of the E6 binding partners have been identified using purified bacterially expressed E6 fusion proteins and cell lysates from various cell types or using yeast two-hybrid screenings. While some of these interactions with E6 have been validated, the physiologic relevance of a number of proposed E6 targets remains undetermined. In an effort to identify E6-interacting proteins, perhaps under more physiologic conditions, we employed tandem affinity purification (TAP) using tagged HPV16 E6 stably expressed in the HPV16-positive cervical cancer cell line SiHa. We have discovered several new interacting proteins, including an interaction between E6 and the cellular deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) USP15. USP15 is not targeted for degradation by E6, but we found that USP15 stabilizes E6 protein levels, suggesting that E6 may itself be a target for USP15 DUB activity.     

Nuclear Export of Human Papillomavirus Type 31 E1 Is Regulated by Cdk2 Phosphorylation and Required for Viral Genome Maintenance

The initiator protein E1 from human papillomavirus (HPV) is a helicase essential for replication of the viral genome. E1 contains three functional domains: a C-terminal enzymatic domain that has ATPase/helicase activity, a central DNA-binding domain that recognizes specific sequences in the origin of replication, and a N-terminal region necessary for viral DNA replication in vivo but dispensable in vitro. This N-terminal portion of E1 contains a conserved nuclear export signal (NES) whose function in the viral life cycle remains unclear. In this study, we provide evidence that nuclear export of HPV31 E1 is inhibited by cyclin E/A-Cdk2 phosphorylation of two serines residues, S92 and S106, located near and within the E1 NES, respectively. Using E1 mutant proteins that are confined to the nucleus, we determined that nuclear export of E1 is not essential for transient viral DNA replication but is important for the long-term maintenance of the HPV episome in undifferentiated keratinocytes. The findings that E1 nuclear export is not required for viral DNA replication but needed for genome maintenance over multiple cell divisions raised the possibility that continuous nuclear accumulation of E1 is detrimental to cellular growth. In support of this possibility, we observed that nuclear accumulation of E1 dramatically reduces cellular proliferation by delaying cell cycle progression in S phase. On the basis of these results, we propose that nuclear export of E1 is required, at least in part, to limit accumulation of this viral helicase in the nucleus in order to prevent its detrimental effect on cellular proliferation.Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are small double-stranded DNA viruses that infect keratinocytes of the differentiating epithelium of the skin or mucosa (reviewed in references 4 and 63). Of more than 150 different HPV types identified thus far, about 25 infect the anogenital region (9). The low-risk types, such as HPV11 and HPV6, are associated with the development of genital warts, while the high-risk types, such as HPV16, -18, and -31, cause high-grade lesions that can progress to invasive cervical carcinoma (17, 38, 61).The HPV life cycle is coupled with the differentiation program that keratinocytes undergo in the epithelium. After infection of the basal cell layer of the epithelium, the virus establishes and maintains its genome as an extrachromosomal element (episome) in the nucleus of infected cells. While the viral episome is maintained at low levels in basal cells, its amplification to a high copy number is trigged in the upper layers of the epithelium by the action of the viral oncogenes E6 and E7 and the differentiation of the infected keratinocytes (reviewed in reference 21). Replication of the HPV genome relies on the viral proteins E1 and E2 and the host DNA replication machinery. Viral DNA replication is initiated by the binding of E2 to specific sites on the viral origin where it facilitates the recruitment and assembly of E1 into a double hexamer that is required to unwind DNA ahead of the bidirectional replication fork (3, 14, 15, 31, 33, 36, 43-45, 52, 60). In addition to its helicase activity, E1 interacts with several cellular replication factors, including polymerase α-primase, replication protein A (RPA), and topoisomerase I, to replicate the viral episome (5, 6, 19, 32, 35, 39).E1, which belongs to helicase superfamily III (SF3) (22, 26), can be divided into three functional regions. Its C-terminal domain has ATPase and helicase activity and can self-assemble into hexamers. It is also this domain that is contacted by E2 to recruit E1 at the origin (50, 57, 58). The middle portion of E1 encompasses the origin-binding domain (OBD) that binds and dimerizes on specific sequences in the origin (55, 56). We and others previously found that a fragment of E1 containing only the C-terminal enzymatic domain and the OBD is capable of supporting viral DNA replication in vitro but is inactive in vivo (2, 51). This suggested that the N-terminal region of E1 plays an essential regulatory function in vivo. As such, it has been shown for HPV11 E1 that this region contains a cyclin E/A-Cdk2 (cyclin-dependent kinase 2) binding motif (CBM), a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) and an CRM1-dependent nuclear export signal (NES), which together regulate the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the protein (10, 30, 34). Specifically, it has been shown that phosphorylation of HPV11 E1 on three serine residues within its N-terminal region inhibits its nuclear export (10, 62). Interestingly, bovine papillomavirus (BPV) E1 was also shown to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. In this case, however, Cdk2 phosphorylation was found to promote, rather than inhibit, the export of the viral helicase (24). This apparent discrepancy between HPV11 and BPV E1 prompted us to examine the regulation of a third E1 protein, specifically that of the high-risk HPV31.We report here that HPV31 E1 also shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm through its conserved NLS and NES. We determined that nuclear export of HPV31 E1 is dependent on the CRM1 export pathway and is inhibited by Cdk2 phosphorylation of serines 92 and 106. We also found that nuclear export of E1 is not required for transient viral DNA replication and thus investigated its role in viral genome maintenance and amplification in immortalized keratinocytes. In contrast to the wild type (WT), a mutant genome carrying a defective E1 NES was poorly maintained and progressively lost upon cell division, indicating that nuclear export of E1 is required for long-term maintenance of the viral episome. Because nuclear export of E1 is not required for viral DNA replication per se but needed for episomal maintenance over several cell divisions, we investigated the possibility that continuous accumulation of E1 into the nucleus is detrimental to cellular proliferation. In support of this possibility, we found that the accumulation of E1 at high levels in the nucleus impedes cellular proliferation by delaying cell cycle progression in the S phase. In addition, we found that this delay was alleviated when nuclear export of E1 was increased. Altogether, these results suggest that nuclear export of E1 is required, at least in part, to limit accumulation of this viral helicase in the nucleus in order to prevent its detrimental effect on cellular proliferation.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Detection of Infectious Adenoviruses in Environmental Waters by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Assay

Methods for rapid detection and quantification of infectious viruses in the environment are urgently needed for public health protection. A fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) assay was developed to detect infectious adenoviruses (Ads) based on the expression of viral protein during replication in cells. The assay was first developed using recombinant Ad serotype 5 (rAd5) with the E1A gene replaced by a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene. Cells infected with rAd5 express GFP, which is captured and quantified by FACS. The results showed that rAd5 can be detected at concentrations of 1 to 10⁴ PFU per assay within 3 days, demonstrating a linear correlation between the viral concentration and the number of GFP-positive cells with an r² value of >0.9. Following the same concept, FACS assays using fluorescently labeled antibodies specific to the E1A and hexon proteins, respectively, were developed. Assays targeting hexon showed greater sensitivity than assays targeting E1A. The results demonstrated that as little as 1 PFU Ads was detected by FACS within 3 days based on hexon protein, with an r² value greater than 0.9 over a 4-log concentration range. Application of this method to environmental samples indicated positive detection of infectious Ads in 50% of primary sewage samples and 33% of secondary treated sewage samples, but none were found in 12 seawater samples. The infectious Ads ranged in quantity between 10 and 165 PFU/100 ml of sewage samples. The results indicate that the FACS assay is a rapid quantification tool for detecting infectious Ads in environmental samples and also represents a considerable advancement for rapid environmental monitoring of infectious viruses.Waterborne viral infection is one of the most important causes of human morbidity in the world. There are hundreds of different types of human viruses present in human sewage, which, if improperly treated, may become the source of contamination in drinking and recreational waters (6, 12, 19). Furthermore, as water scarcity intensifies in the nation, so has consideration of wastewater reuse as a valid and essential alternative for resolving water shortages (31).Currently, routine viral monitoring is not required for drinking or recreational waters, nor is it required for wastewater that is discharged into the environment. This lack of a monitoring effort is due largely to the lack of methods that can rapidly and sensitively detect infectious viruses in environmental samples. In the past 20 years, tremendous progress has been made in detection of viruses in the environment based on molecular technology (32, 33, 35). PCR and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) methods have improved both the speed and sensitivity of viral detection compared with detection by the traditional tissue culture method (2, 11, 17, 18). However, they provide little information on viral infectivity, which is crucial for human health risk assessment (22-24, 35). Our previous work using a real-time PCR assay to detect human adenoviruses (Ads) in sewage could not differentiate the infectious viruses in the secondary treated sewage from those killed by chlorination disinfection (15). In this research, we pursued an innovative approach to detecting infectious viruses in water using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This method is rapid and sensitive, with an established record in microbiological research (29, 34, 39).FACS is a specialized type of flow cytometry which provides a method for counting and sorting a heterogeneous mixture of biological cells into two or more kinds, one cell at a time, based upon the specific light-scattering and fluorescent characteristics of each cell (4, 25, 34, 38). It is a useful method since it provides fast and quantitative recording of fluorescent signals from individual cells (14, 16, 34, 47). The FACS viral assay is based on the expression of viral protein inside the recipient cell during viral replication (16). Specific antibody labeled with fluorescence is bound to the target viral protein, which results in fluorescence emission from infected cells. Viral particles outside the cell will not be captured, because the size of virus is below the detection limit of flow cytometry. Therefore, detection of cells, which can be captured with fluorescently labeled viral antibody, is a definitive indication of the presence of infectious virus.This research used human Ads as the target for development of the FACS method. The rationale for this choice is as follows. (i) Ads are important human pathogens that may be transmitted by water consumption and water spray (aerosols) (26, 32). The health hazard associated with exposure to Ads has been demonstrated by epidemiological data and clinical research (1, 7, 9, 35, 40, 43). (ii) Ads are among the most prevalent human viruses identified in human sewage and are frequently detected in marine waters and the Great Lakes (17, 32, 33, 35). (iii) Ads are more resistant to UV disinfection than any other bacteria or viruses (3, 5, 10, 24, 41, 42, 44). Thus, they may survive wastewater treatment as increasing numbers of wastewater treatment facilities switch from chlorination to UV to avoid disinfection by-products. (iv) Some serotypes of Ads, including enteric Ad 40 and 41, are fastidious. They are difficult to detect by plaque assay, and a routine assay of infectivity takes 7 to 14 days (8, 20).In this study, recombinant Ad serotype 5 (rAd5) with the E1A gene (the first transcribed gene after infection) replaced by a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was first used to test for sensitivity and speed of the assay. Two other viral proteins were then used as targets for development of FACS assays using Ad serotype 2 (Ad2) and Ad41. This study demonstrated the feasibility, sensitivity, and reliability of the assay for detection of infectious Ads in environmental samples.