Special Sm Core Complex Functions in Assembly of the U2 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein of Trypanosoma brucei

The processing of polycistronic pre-mRNAs in trypanosomes requires the spliceosomal small ribonucleoprotein complexes (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4/U6, U5, and SL, each of which contains a core of seven Sm proteins. Recently we reported the first evidence for a core variation in spliceosomal snRNPs; specifically, in the trypanosome U2 snRNP, two of the canonical Sm proteins, SmB and SmD3, are replaced by two U2-specific Sm proteins, Sm15K and Sm16.5K. Here we identify the U2-specific, nuclear-localized U2B″ protein from Trypanosoma brucei. U2B″ interacts with a second U2 snRNP protein, U2-40K (U2A′), which in turn contacts the U2-specific Sm16.5K/15K subcomplex. Together they form a high-affinity, U2-specific binding complex. This trypanosome-specific assembly differs from the mammalian system and provides a functional role for the Sm core variation found in the trypanosomal U2 snRNP.In trypanosomes, trans-splicing is an essential step in the expression of all protein-coding genes. The resulting mRNAs always carry a noncoding spliced leader (SL) sequence of 39 nucleotides at their 5′ ends, which is derived from the SL RNA. In addition to the SL RNA, the small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) U2, U4, U5, and U6 are essential cofactors during trans-splicing (reviewed in reference 14).In previous studies, we characterized some of the protein components of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) from Trypanosoma brucei. All snRNPs contain a core of seven Sm polypeptides (18). Recently, we reported that the identity of the Sm proteins varies among spliceosomal snRNPs; specifically, two of the canonical Sm proteins, SmB and SmD3, are replaced in the U2 snRNP by two novel, U2 snRNP-specific Sm proteins, Sm15K and Sm16.5K (34). There is a similar case of Sm core variation in the U4 snRNP, where a single Sm protein, SmD3, is replaced by a U4-specific LSm protein (32; N. Jaé and A. Bindereif, unpublished data). Trypanosomal snRNAs also differ significantly from what we know in other systems, reflecting the large evolutionary distance and trypanosome-specific properties. For example, both the U1 and U5 snRNAs from trypanosomes represent the shortest known orthologues (6, 19).In addition to the Sm proteins, some snRNP-specific protein factors were found in trypanosomes. Sequence comparisons identified the U2-40K protein as the trypanosomal homologue of the human U2A′ protein (5), a finding that was unexpected, since no immunological relationship could be detected between these proteins (17). As characterized in other systems, including those of humans, yeasts, and plants (9, 29, 31), the U2 snRNP contains a second specific protein, U2B″, a protein closely related to the U1 snRNP protein U1A. Except for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae orthologue, the known U2B″ proteins are built of two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), with the N-terminal RRM being responsible for snRNA binding specificity (25). The close relatedness of these two proteins is also reflected in Drosophila melanogaster, where a single protein, SNF/D25, combines the functions of both individual proteins (11, 22). Furthermore, genetic and functional redundancy was demonstrated for the two proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans (24).From previous studies on the mammalian U2 snRNP, we know that the U2- specific proteins U2A′ and U2B″ interact with each other, independently of U2 snRNA; moreover, U2B″ binds directly to loop nucleotides of stem-loop IV, but only with the assistance of interacting U2A′ (23, 25, 26). Analogous to the cis-splicing mechanism, the U2 snRNP is likely to play an important role in early trans-spliceosome assembly. Compared with the other snRNAs, the trypanosomatid U2 snRNA differs in several important aspects from its highly conserved counterparts in other species. First, stem-loop III is precisely deleted. Second, the branch point recognition region located between stem-loops I and IIa is missing; in parallel, there is no stringent consensus of branch points in the 3′-splice site region of the polycistronic pre-mRNA. Third, the Sm protein binding site does not follow the general consensus. Finally, only some of the otherwise highly conserved loop IV nucleotides occur in the trypanosomatid U2 snRNAs (7, 12, 15, 33).Here we report the identification and characterization of the U2-specific protein U2B″ of T. brucei. Sequence analysis revealed that the trypanosomal orthologue contains only a single RRM, in contrast to the mammalian, two-RRM domain structure, and that the homology is restricted to this single RRM. We show that U2-40K (U2A′) binds very efficiently to U2B″ in the absence of U2 snRNA and increases the binding affinity of U2B″ to U2 snRNA. Furthermore U2-40K (U2A′) contacts the two specific components of the U2 Sm core, Sm16.5K and Sm 15K, forming together a high-affinity, U2-specific binding complex. This establishes a specific function of the U2 Sm core variation in mediating U2-specific protein-protein interactions.     

Essential Role of a Trypanosome U4-Specific Sm Core Protein in Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Assembly and Splicing

Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) in trypanosomes contain either the canonical heptameric Sm ring or variant Sm cores with snRNA-specific Sm subunits. Here we show biochemically by a combination of RNase H cleavage and tandem affinity purification that the U4 snRNP contains a variant Sm heteroheptamer core in which only SmD3 is replaced by SSm4. This U4-specific, nuclear-localized Sm core protein is essential for growth and splicing. As shown by RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown, SSm4 is specifically required for the integrity of the U4 snRNA and the U4/U6 di-snRNP in trypanosomes. In addition, we demonstrate by in vitro reconstitution of Sm cores that under stringent conditions, the SSm4 protein suffices to specify the assembly of U4 Sm cores. Together, these data indicate that the assembly of the U4-specific Sm core provides an essential step in U4/U6 di-snRNP biogenesis and splicing in trypanosomes.The excision of intronic sequences from precursor mRNAs is a critical step during eukaryotic gene expression. This reaction is catalyzed by the spliceosome, a macromolecular complex composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and many additional proteins. Spliceosome assembly and splicing catalysis occur in an ordered multistep process, which includes multiple conformational rearrangements (35). Spliceosomal snRNPs are assembled from snRNAs and protein components, the latter of which fall into two classes: snRNP-specific and common proteins. The common or canonical core proteins are also termed Sm proteins, specifically SmB, SmD1, SmD2, SmD3, SmE, SmF, and SmG (10; reviewed in reference 9), which all share an evolutionarily conserved bipartite sequence motif (Sm1 and Sm2) required for Sm protein interactions and the formation of the heteroheptameric Sm core complex around the Sm sites of the snRNAs (3, 7, 29). Prior to this, the Sm proteins form three heteromeric subcomplexes: SmD3/SmB, SmD1/SmD2, and SmE/SmF/SmG (23; reviewed in reference 34). Individual Sm proteins or Sm subcomplexes cannot stably interact with the snRNA. Instead, a stable subcore forms by an association of the subcomplexes SmD1/SmD2 and SmE/SmF/SmG with the Sm site on the snRNA; the subsequent integration of the SmD3/SmB heterodimer completes Sm core assembly.In addition to the canonical Sm proteins, other proteins carrying the Sm motif have been identified for many eukaryotes. Those proteins, termed LSm (like Sm) proteins, exist in distinct heptameric complexes that differ in function and localization. For example, a complex composed of LSm1 to LSm7 (LSm1-7) accumulates in cytoplasmic foci and participates in mRNA turnover (4, 8, 31). Another complex, LSm2-8, binds to the 3′ oligo(U) tract of the U6 snRNA in the nucleus (1, 15, 24). Finally, in the U7 snRNP, which is involved in histone mRNA 3′-end processing, the Sm proteins SmD1 and SmD2 are replaced by U7-specific LSm10 and LSm11 proteins, respectively (20, 21; reviewed in reference 28).This knowledge is based primarily on the mammalian system, where spliceosomal snRNPs are biochemically well characterized (34). In contrast, for trypanosomes, comparatively little is known about the components of the splicing machinery and their assembly and biogenesis. In trypanosomes, the expression of all protein-encoding genes, which are arranged in long polycistronic units, requires trans splicing. Only a small number of genes are additionally processed by cis splicing (reviewed in reference 11). During trans splicing, a short noncoding miniexon, derived from the spliced leader (SL) RNA, is added to each protein-encoding exon. Regarding the trypanosomal splicing machinery, the U2, U4/U6, and U5 snRNPs are considered to be general splicing factors, whereas the U1 and SL snRNPs represent cis- and trans-splicing-specific components, respectively. In addition to the snRNAs, many protein splicing factors in trypanosomes have been identified based on sequence homology (for example, see references 14 and 19).Recent studies revealed variations in the Sm core compositions of spliceosomal snRNPs from Trypanosoma brucei. Specifically, in the U2 snRNP, two of the canonical Sm proteins, SmD3 and SmB, are replaced by two novel, U2 snRNP-specific proteins, Sm16.5K and Sm15K (33). In this case, an unusual purine nucleotide, interrupting the central uridine stretch of the U2 snRNA Sm site, discriminates between the U2-specific and the canonical Sm cores. A second case of Sm core variation was reported for the U4 snRNP, in which a single protein, SmD3, was suggested to be replaced by the U4-specific LSm protein initially called LSm2, and later called SSm4, based on a U4-specific destabilization after SSm4 knockdown (30). A U4-specific Sm core variation was also previously suggested and discussed by Wang et al. (33), based on the inefficient pulldown of U4 snRNA through tagged SmD3 protein. However, neither of these two studies conclusively demonstrated by biochemical criteria that the specific Sm protein resides in the U4 Sm core; a copurification of other snRNPs could not be unequivocally ruled out.By using a combination of RNase H cleavage, tandem affinity purification, and mass spectrometry, we provide here direct biochemical evidence that in the variant Sm core of the U4 snRNP, only SmD3 is replaced by the U4-specific SSm4. SSm4 is nuclear localized, and the silencing of SSm4 leads to a characteristic phenotype: dramatic growth inhibition, general trans- and cis-splicing defects, a loss of the integrity of the U4 snRNA, as well as a destabilization of the U4/U6 di-snRNP. Furthermore, in vitro reconstitution assays revealed that under stringent conditions, SSm4 is sufficient to specify U4-specific Sm core assembly. In sum, our data establish SSm4 as a specific component of the U4 Sm core and demonstrate its importance in U4/U6 di-snRNP biogenesis, splicing function, and cell viability.     

A Targeted Bypass Screen Identifies Ynl187p,Prp42p,Snu71p,and Cbp80p for Stable U1 snRNP/Pre-mRNA Interaction

To understand how DEXD/H-box proteins recognize and interact with their cellular substrates, we have been studying Prp28p, a DEXD/H-box splicing factor required for switching the U1 snRNP with the U6 snRNP at the precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) 5′ splice site. We previously demonstrated that the requirement for Prp28p can be eliminated by mutations that alter either the U1 snRNA or the U1C protein, suggesting that both are targets of Prp28p. Inspired by this finding, we designed a bypass genetic screen to specifically search for additional, novel targets of Prp28p. The screen identified Prp42p, Snu71p, and Cbp80p, all known components of commitment complexes, as well as Ynl187p, a protein of uncertain function. To examine the role of Ynl187p in splicing, we carried out extensive genetic and biochemical analysis, including chromatin immunoprecipitation. Our data suggest that Ynl187p acts in concert with U1C and Cbp80p to help stabilize the U1 snRNP-5′ splice site interaction. These findings are discussed in the context of DEXD/H-box proteins and their role in vivo as well as the potential need for more integral U1-snRNP proteins in governing the fungal 5′ splice site RNA-RNA interaction compared to the number of U1 snRNP proteins needed by metazoans.Nuclear precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) splicing takes place in the spliceosome, a large dynamic complex consisting of over 100 proteins and five small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) (32, 70). During spliceosome assembly, the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) first contacts the pre-mRNA 5′ splice site (5′ss), followed by binding of the U2 snRNP to the branch site and the joining of the U5-U4/U6 tri-snRNP (32, 64, 70). The step in which U1 snRNP binds to the 5′ss is arguably one of the most critical, because it probably commits pre-mRNA to the splicing pathway (38, 48, 49, 60, 74). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in vitro system, two U1-snRNP-containing commitment complexes (CCs), CC1 and CC2, can be detected by native gel electrophoresis prior to the U2 snRNP''s joining to form the prespliceosome (38, 60). CC1, whose formation is dependent on a functional 5′ss, appears to be a kinetic precursor to CC2, whose formation requires both a functional 5′ss and branch site and the participation of the branch-site-binding protein (BBP) and Mud2p, which are likely equivalent to SF1 and U2AF65, respectively, in the mammalian system (1-3, 75).Accumulating evidence suggests that formation of the canonical 5- to 7-bp RNA duplex between U1 snRNA and the 5′ss region is not sufficient to cause a stable CC to form in the yeast system (59, 62, 78); protein-RNA contacts are also important. For example, Zhang and Rosbash (77) identified eight proteins, all present in CCs, that make physical contact with the pre-mRNA at or near the 5′ss. Four of these proteins, U1C, U1-70K, Snu56p, and Nam8p, are integral parts of the U1 snRNP (20), and another three, SmB, SmD1, and SmD3, belong to the seven-member ring that binds the conserved Sm site present on U1, U2, U4, and U5 snRNAs (33, 71). The remaining protein, Cbp80p, is a subunit of the nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC), which also contains a second subunit, Cbp20p (28, 39). Interestingly, despite being a non-snRNP factor, Cbp80p is known to collaborate with U1 snRNP to help form or stabilize CC1 (8, 40). Furthermore, the contact between the C-terminal tails of SmB, SmD1, and SmD3 and the pre-mRNA may contribute to stabilizing the U1 snRNP/pre-mRNA interaction (76). Finally, Du and Rosbash (11) more recently showed that U1C is capable of selecting splice-site-like sequences in which the first four nucleotides, GUAU, are identical to the first four nucleotides of the yeast splice-site consensus sequence.Once fully assembled, the spliceosome must progress through a number of major structural and conformational changes to form the catalytic center; these include a series of highly orchestrated RNA-RNA rearrangements (53, 64, 70). Some of these are mutually exclusive; i.e., the formation of one RNA duplex requires the disruption of another. For example, the base-pairing interaction between the U1 snRNA and the 5′ss is replaced by a U6 snRNA/5′ss pairing. This exchange appears to be coupled to U4/U6 RNA unwinding (53, 64, 70). It is now known that splicing factors belonging to the ATPase II superfamily (18), which are also termed the DEXD/H-box proteins (5, 43), promote spliceosomal RNA rearrangements (64). However, the precise roles of most DEXD/H-box proteins remain unclear.It has been nearly 2 decades since DEXD/H-box proteins were first proposed to be RNA helicases (44). Over the years, a wealth of data revealed that DEXD/H-box proteins are essential in most, if not all, RNA-related pathways, e.g., splicing, mRNA export, and ribosomal biogenesis (5, 43, 64). Their modes of action in vivo remain a mystery, however. For example, Lorsch and Herschlag (45, 46) proposed that DEXD/H-box proteins may perform functions which are distinct from RNA unwinding and include mediating large-scale RNA structural rearrangements, disrupting protein-RNA or protein-protein interactions, and functioning as fidelity sensors in RNA-RNA interactions and rearrangements. Indeed, recent data confirm that DEXD/H-box proteins can catalyze protein displacement in a manner independent of RNA duplex unwinding (30). Therefore, the essential functions of DExH/D proteins can be exerted on a wide range of RNP substrates. This “RNPase” (or ATPase for RNP remodeling) hypothesis appears especially attractive in light of the fact that RNA duplexes in vivo are rarely more than ∼10 contiguous base pairs in length and that they often require protein binding for stabilization (21, 63). To fully understand how DEXD/H-box proteins function in the cell, it is critical to identify their physiological substrates.Inspired by our previous finding that the requirement for Prp28p, an essential DEXD/H-box splicing factor, can be bypassed by mutations that alter the YHC1 gene, which encodes U1C protein (7), we sought to exploit the bypass concept to deepen our understanding of the role of Prp28p in splicing. The underlying hypothesis is that bypass mutations define gene products that Prp28p may counteract. Here we describe the outcome of this approach and provide a detailed analysis of Ynl187p, a novel protein that probably contributes to stabilizing the U1 snRNP-5′ss interaction.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Multiple Interaction Domains in FtsL,a Protein Component of the Widely Conserved Bacterial FtsLBQ Cell Division Complex

A bioinformatic analysis of nearly 400 genomes indicates that the overwhelming majority of bacteria possess homologs of the Escherichia coli proteins FtsL, FtsB, and FtsQ, three proteins essential for cell division in that bacterium. These three bitopic membrane proteins form a subcomplex in vivo, independent of the other cell division proteins. Here we analyze the domains of E. coli FtsL that are involved in the interaction with other cell division proteins and important for the assembly of the divisome. We show that FtsL, as we have found previously with FtsB, packs an enormous amount of information in its sequence for interactions with proteins upstream and downstream in the assembly pathway. Given their size, it is likely that the sole function of the complex of these two proteins is to act as a scaffold for divisome assembly.The division of an Escherichia coli cell into two daughter cells requires a complex of proteins, the divisome, to coordinate the constriction of the three layers of the Gram-negative cell envelope. In E. coli, there are 10 proteins known to be essential for cell division; in the absence of any one of these proteins, cells continue to elongate and to replicate and segregate their chromosomes but fail to divide (29). Numerous additional nonessential proteins have been identified that localize to midcell and assist in cell division (7-9, 20, 25, 34, 56, 59).A localization dependency pathway has been determined for the 10 essential division proteins (FtsZ→FtsA/ZipA→FtsK→FtsQ→FtsL/FtsB→FtsW→FtsI→FtsN), suggesting that the divisome assembles in a hierarchical manner (29). Based on this pathway, a given protein depends on the presence of all upstream proteins (to the left) for its localization and that protein is then required for the localization of the downstream division proteins (to the right). While the localization dependency pathway of cell division proteins suggests that a sequence of interactions is necessary for divisome formation, recent work using a variety of techniques reveals that a more complex web of interactions among these proteins is necessary for a functionally stable complex (6, 10, 19, 23, 24, 30-32, 40). While numerous interactions have been identified between division proteins, further work is needed to define which domains are involved and which interactions are necessary for assembly of the divisome.One subcomplex of the divisome, composed of the bitopic membrane proteins FtsB, FtsL, and FtsQ, appears to be the bridge between the predominantly cytoplasmic cell division proteins and the predominantly periplasmic cell division proteins (10). FtsB, FtsL, and FtsQ share a similar topology: short amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains and larger carboxy-terminal periplasmic domains. This tripartite complex can be divided further into a subcomplex of FtsB and FtsL, which forms in the absence of FtsQ and interacts with the downstream division proteins FtsW and FtsI in the absence of FtsQ (30). The presence of an FtsB/FtsL/FtsQ subcomplex appears to be evolutionarily conserved, as there is evidence that the homologs of FtsB, FtsL, and FtsQ in the Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae also assemble into complexes (18, 52, 55).The assembly of the FtsB/FtsL/FtsQ complex is important for the stabilization and localization of one or more of its component proteins in both E. coli and B. subtilis (11, 16, 18, 33). In E. coli, FtsB and FtsL are codependent for their stabilization and for localization to midcell, while FtsQ does not require either FtsB or FtsL for its stabilization or localization to midcell (11, 33). Both FtsL and FtsB require FtsQ for localization to midcell, and in the absence of FtsQ the levels of full-length FtsB are significantly reduced (11, 33). The observed reduction in full-length FtsB levels that occurs in the absence of FtsQ or FtsL results from the degradation of the FtsB C terminus (33). However, the C-terminally degraded FtsB generated upon depletion of FtsQ can still interact with and stabilize FtsL (33).While a portion of the FtsB C terminus is dispensable for interaction with FtsL and for the recruitment of the downstream division proteins FtsW and FtsI, it is required for interaction with FtsQ (33). Correspondingly, the FtsQ C terminus also appears to be important for interaction with FtsB and FtsL (32, 61). The interaction between FtsB and FtsL appears to be mediated by the predicted coiled-coil motifs within the periplasmic domains of the two proteins, although only the membrane-proximal half of the FtsB coiled coil is necessary for interaction with FtsL (10, 32, 33). Additionally, the transmembrane domains of FtsB and FtsL are important for their interaction with each other, while the cytoplasmic domain of FtsL is not necessary for interaction with FtsB, which has only a short 3-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain (10, 33).In this study, we focused on the interaction domains of FtsL. We find that, as with FtsB, the C terminus of FtsL is required for the interaction of FtsQ with the FtsB/FtsL subcomplex while the cytoplasmic domain of FtsL is involved in recruitment of the downstream division proteins. Finally, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the presence of FtsB, FtsL, and FtsQ homologs among bacteria and find that the proteins of this complex are likely more widely distributed among bacteria than was previously thought.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Ustilago maydis Rho1 and 14-3-3 Homologues Participate in Pathways Controlling Cell Separation and Cell Polarity

Proteins of the 14-3-3 and Rho-GTPase families are functionally conserved eukaryotic proteins that participate in many important cellular processes such as signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, malignant transformation, stress response, and apoptosis. However, the exact role(s) of these proteins in these processes is not entirely understood. Using the fungal maize pathogen, Ustilago maydis, we were able to demonstrate a functional connection between Pdc1 and Rho1, the U. maydis homologues of 14-3-3ɛ and Rho1, respectively. Our experiments suggest that Pdc1 regulates viability, cytokinesis, chromosome condensation, and vacuole formation. Similarly, U. maydis Rho1 is also involved in these three essential processes and exerts an additional function during mating and filamentation. Intriguingly, yeast two-hybrid and epistasis experiments suggest that both Pdc1 and Rho1 could be constituents of the same regulatory cascade(s) controlling cell growth and filamentation in U. maydis. Overexpression of rho1 ameliorated the defects of cells depleted for Pdc1. Furthermore, we found that another small G protein, Rac1, was a suppressor of lethality for both Pdc1 and Rho1. In addition, deletion of cla4, encoding a Rac1 effector kinase, could also rescue cells with Pdc1 depleted. Inferring from these data, we propose a model for Rho1 and Pdc1 functions in U. maydis.Morphological switching is a unique attribute of all dimorphic fungi, which alternate between budding and filamentous growth. In some cases, as with mating, this is a prerequisite for genetic diversity for this subfamily of fungi. In addition, many dimorphic fungal pathogens rely on this ability in order to effectively invade their host. In general, the transition between these alternate life forms means a complete turnover of cellular and proteomic components, which often involves cell cycle arrest and/or cytoskeletal rearrangement. Although the cellular proteomes associated with these two processes share many components, there are both temporal and spatial regulations that are manifested during the transitional phase (4).Temporal-spatial regulation of the proteome during the dimorphic transition requires cooperation and synchronized communication among different regulatory pathways. Two highly intricate, yet well-established, signaling cascades that regulate fungal morphogenesis are the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (34, 46) and protein kinase A pathways (11). These signaling cascades detect and perpetuate extracellular stimuli, e.g., pheromones and nutrients, which lead to phase transitions in dimorphic fungi. Although the mechanisms are not as fully understood, members of two highly conserved families of proteins, Rho/Rac GTPases and 14-3-3 proteins, have also been shown to control filamentation. Constituents of the Rho/Rac protein family have been shown to regulate actin organization (26, 35, 36), cytokinesis (3, 49, 52), cell integrity (42, 56), pathogenicity (29), signal transduction (22, 44, 56), and cell migration (8). Their activity is dependent upon the reversible binding of guanine nucleotides catalyzed by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) (15, 22, 23, 25, 44). Upon activation, Rho-GTPases stimulate downstream effector proteins such as p21-activated kinases (PAKs) (29, 51) or Rho kinase (ROCK) (36). Based on in silico analysis of the genome sequence, the fungal pathogen of maize, Ustilago maydis, contains six different Rho/Rac encoding genes: cdc42, rac1, and four additional genes predicted to encode Rho-like proteins (20). Of these, only the roles of Cdc42 and Rac1 have been examined in depth. Cdc42 was shown to regulate cytokinesis, while Rac1 regulates hyphal development in U. maydis (26). We examine here the place of a Rho1 homologue, Rho1, in U. maydis cell morphology, polarity, and development.Similarly, the highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed 14-3-3 proteins that are found in most eukaryotes have also been shown to contribute to cellular differentiation and cytoskeletal organization. Like Rho-GTPases, 14-3-3 proteins play multiple roles, in cytoskeletal function, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and the regulation of a variety of signaling pathways (17, 19, 33, 50). These acidic proteins have been found in each cellular compartment and most organisms examined possess multiple isoforms: seven isoforms are found in mammals, and as many as fifteen isoforms have been identified in plants (31). Interestingly, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, each possess only two 14-3-3 isoforms (50), while Candida albicans contains a single isoform (37). They function typically by binding their particular ligands at phosphoserine or phosphothreonine residues (50). It is not clear what 14-3-3 proteins do in the processes mentioned above, whether they act as scaffolds or effectors. Inspection of the U. maydis genome sequence revealed that this organism could be ideal for the study of 14-3-3 proteins because, unlike most other organisms, the U. maydis genome contains only a single 14-3-3 homologue. Due to its predicted binding of phosphorylated proteins, we named this homologue Pdc1 (for phosphorylation domain coupling protein [10]). Recently, the protein (also designated Bmh1 [32]) was also shown to be involved in cell cycle regulation.Despite the functional differences between Rho-GTPases and 14-3-3 proteins, we provide evidence that members of these two families participate in the same regulatory cascade(s) that control morphogenesis in the dimorphic fungus U. maydis. We are able to demonstrate that both Pdc1 and Rho1 are essential for cell viability. In addition, overexpression of Rho1 led to the reduction of filamentation. Overexpression of Rac1 triggers filamentation in U. maydis (13, 29). We show here that deleting Rac1 eliminates the lethal effect imposed by either Rho1 or Pdc1 depletion. Our results have led us to predict that both Rho1 and Pdc1 are negative regulators of Rac1 in U. maydis and that they play important roles in polarized growth and cytokinesis.