Compartmentalization and Clonal Amplification of HIV-1 Variants in the Cerebrospinal Fluid during Primary Infection

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-associated dementia (HAD) is a severe neurological disease that affects a subset of HIV-1-infected individuals. Increased compartmentalization has been reported between blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 populations in subjects with HAD, but it is still not known when compartmentalization arises during the course of infection. To assess HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization early during infection, we compared HIV-1 populations in the peripheral blood and CSF in 11 primary infection subjects, with analysis of longitudinal samples over the first 18 months for a subset of subjects. We used heteroduplex tracking assays targeting the variable regions of env and single-genome amplification and sequence analysis of the full-length env gene to identify CSF-compartmentalized variants and to examine viral genotypes within the compartmentalized populations. For most subjects, HIV-1 populations were equilibrated between the blood and CSF compartments. However, compartmentalized HIV-1 populations were detected in the CSF of three primary infection subjects, and longitudinal analysis of one subject revealed that compartmentalization during primary HIV-1 infection was resolved. Clonal amplification of specific HIV-1 variants was identified in the CSF population of one primary infection subject. Our data show that compartmentalization can occur in the central nervous system (CNS) of subjects in primary HIV-1 infection in part through persistence of the putative transmitted parental variant or via viral genetic adaptation to the CNS environment. The presence of distinct HIV-1 populations in the CSF indicates that independent HIV-1 replication can occur in the CNS, even early after HIV-1 transmission.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of the central nervous system (CNS) can lead to neurological disease in a subset of HIV-infected individuals and may include the development of HIV-1-associated dementia (HAD) (2, 18). HAD is characterized by severe neurological dysfunction, and affected individuals generally have impaired cognitive and motor functions. HIV-1 enters the CNS during primary infection, most likely via the migration of infected monocytes and lymphocytes across the blood-brain barrier (33, 37, 42). The main cell types in the CNS that HIV-1 can productively infect are the perivascular macrophages and microglial cells, which express low receptor densities of CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 (7, 18, 60, 63). Previous studies have also reported that neurotropic HIV-1 variants are generally macrophage tropic (19, 20, 32, 45, 52, 61). Although cells in the CNS may be infected with HIV-1 during the course of disease, it is still unclear whether productive HIV-1 replication occurs in the CNS early during infection.Genetically compartmentalized HIV-1 variants have been detected in the brains of HAD subjects at autopsy (13, 14, 43, 48, 52) and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of HAD subjects sampled over the course of infection (26, 46, 51, 59). Extensive compartmentalization between the periphery and the CNS has been reported in subjects with HAD; however, it is not yet known when compartmentalization occurs during the course of HIV-1 infection. Primary HIV-1 infection refers to the acute and early phases of infection, during which peak plasma viremia often occurs and a viral “set point” may be reached (8, 34), within the first year after HIV exposure (64). Studies examining compartmentalization between the blood plasma and CSF during primary infection have been limited, and extensive compartmentalization has not been detected in primary infection subjects (26, 50).In this study, we examined HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization between the peripheral blood and CSF during primary HIV-1 infection. Cross-sectional and longitudinal blood plasma and CSF samples were analyzed for viral compartmentalization using the heteroduplex tracking assay (HTA) and single genome amplification (SGA). We used the HTA to differentiate between HIV-1 variants in the CSF that were either compartmentalized to the CSF or equilibrated with the peripheral blood. Previous studies have used the HTA to separate HIV-1 genetic variants in different anatomical compartments (10, 24, 27, 51) and to follow HIV-1 evolutionary variants over the course of infection (9, 25, 31, 41, 49, 50). We also conducted SGA on a subset of subjects to further examine viral genetic compartmentalization during primary infection. Here we report the detection of compartmentalized and clonally amplified HIV-1 variants in the CSF of subjects in the primary stage of HIV-1 infection. Our results suggest that minor to extensive HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization can occur between the periphery and the CNS during primary HIV-1 infection and that viral compartmentalization, as measured in the CSF, is transient in some subjects.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Preinfection Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Failed To Prevent HIV Type 1 Infection from Strains Genetically Unrelated to Viruses in Long-Term Exposed Partners

Understanding the mechanisms underlying potential altered susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) individuals and the later clinical consequences of breakthrough infection can provide insight into strategies to control HIV-1 with an effective vaccine. From our Seattle ES cohort, we identified one individual (LSC63) who seroconverted after over 2 years of repeated unprotected sexual contact with his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 variants infecting LSC63 were genetically unrelated to those sequenced from P63. This may not be surprising, since viral load measurements in P63 were repeatedly below 50 copies/ml, making him an unlikely transmitter. However, broad HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses were detected in LSC63 before seroconversion. Compared to those detected after seroconversion, these responses were of lower magnitude and half of them targeted different regions of the viral proteome. Strong HLA-B27-restricted CTLs, which have been associated with disease control, were detected in LSC63 after but not before seroconversion. Furthermore, for the majority of the protein-coding regions of the HIV-1 variants in LSC63 (except gp41, nef, and the 3′ half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the viruses to which he was exposed through P63 (termed the exposed virus) were comparable to the distances between random subtype B HIV-1 sequences and the exposed viruses. These results suggest that broad preinfection immune responses were not able to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection in LSC63, even though the infecting viruses were not particularly distant from the viruses that may have elicited these responses.Understanding the mechanisms of altered susceptibility or control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) persons may provide invaluable information aiding the design of HIV-1 vaccines and therapy (9, 14, 15, 33, 45, 57, 58). In a cohort of female commercial sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, a small proportion of individuals remained seronegative for over 3 years despite the continued practice of unprotected sex (12, 28, 55, 56). Similarly, resistance to HIV-1 infection has been reported in homosexual men who frequently practiced unprotected sex with infected partners (1, 15, 17, 21, 61). Multiple factors have been associated with the resistance to HIV-1 infection in ES individuals (32), including host genetic factors (8, 16, 20, 37-39, 44, 46, 47, 49, 59, 63), such as certain HLA class I and II alleles (41), as well as cellular (1, 15, 26, 55, 56), humoral (25, 29), and innate immune responses (22, 35).Seroconversion in previously HIV-resistant Nairobi female commercial sex workers, despite preexisting HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses, has been reported (27). Similarly, 13 of 125 ES enrollees in our Seattle ES cohort (1, 15, 17) have become late seroconverters (H. Zhu, T. Andrus, Y. Liu, and T. Zhu, unpublished observations). Here, we analyze the virology, genetics, and immune responses of HIV-1 infection in one of the later seroconverting subjects, LSC63, who had developed broad CTL responses before seroconversion.     

Virological Synapse-Mediated Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 between T Cells Is Sensitive to Entry Inhibition

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate between CD4⁺ T cells via diffusion-limited cell-free viral spread or by directed cell-cell transfer using virally induced structures termed virological synapses. Although T-cell virological synapses have been well characterized, it is unclear whether this mode of viral spread is susceptible to inhibition by neutralizing antibodies and entry inhibitors. We show here that both cell-cell and cell-free viral spread are equivalently sensitive to entry inhibition. Fluorescence imaging analysis measuring virological synapse lifetimes and inhibitor time-of-addition studies implied that inhibitors can access preformed virological synapses and interfere with HIV-1 cell-cell infection. This concept was supported by electron tomography that revealed the T-cell virological synapse to be a relatively permeable structure. Virological synapse-mediated HIV-1 spread is thus efficient but is not an immune or entry inhibitor evasion mechanism, a result that is encouraging for vaccine and drug design.As with enveloped viruses from several viral families, the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate both by fluid-phase diffusion of viral particles and by directed cell-cell transfer (39). The primary target cell for HIV-1 replication in vivo is the CD4⁺ T-cell (13), which is infectible by CCR5-tropic (R5) and CXCR4-tropic (X4) viral variants (29). R5 HIV-1 is the major transmitted viral phenotype and dominates the global pandemic, whereas X4 virus is found later in infection in ca. 50% of infected individuals, and its presence indicates a poor disease progression prognosis (23). Cell-cell HIV-1 transfer between T cells is more efficient than diffusion-limited spread (8, 16, 32, 38), although recent estimates for the differential range from approximately 1 (42) to 4 (6) orders of magnitude. Two structures have been proposed to support contact-mediated intercellular movement of HIV-1 between T cells: membrane nanotubes (33, 43) and macromolecular adhesive contacts termed virological synapses (VS) (15, 17, 33). VS appear to be the dominant structure involved in T-cell-T-cell spread (33), and both X4 (17) and R5 HIV-1 (6, 15, 42) can spread between T cells via this mechanism.VS assembly and function are dependent on HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) engaging its primary cellular receptor CD4 (2, 6, 17). This interaction recruits more CD4 and coreceptor to the site of cell-cell contact in an actin-dependent manner (17). Adhesion molecules cluster at the intercellular junction and are thought to stabilize the VS (18). In parallel, viral Env and Gag are recruited to the interface by a microtubule-dependent mechanism (19), where polarized viral budding may release virions into the synaptic space across which the target cell is infected (17). The precise mechanism by which HIV-1 subsequently enters the target T-cell cytoplasm remains unclear: by fusion directly at the plasma membrane, fusion from within an endosomal compartment, or both (4, 6, 15, 25, 34).Viruses from diverse families including herpesviruses (9), poxviruses (22) and hepatitis C virus (44) evade neutralizing antibody attack by direct cell-cell spread, since the tight junctions across which the these viruses move are antibody impermeable. It has been speculated that transfer of HIV-1 across VS may promote evasion from immune or therapeutic intervention with the inference that the junctions formed in retroviral VS may be nonpermissive to antibody entry (39). However, available evidence regarding whether neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and other entry inhibitors can inhibit HIV-1 cell-cell spread is inconsistent (25). An early analysis suggested that HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread is relatively resistant to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NMAb) (12). A later study agreed with this conclusion by demonstrating a lack of permissivity of HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread, measured by transfer of viral Gag, to interference with viral fusion using a gp41-specific NMAb and a peptidic fusion inhibitor (6). In contrast, another analysis reported that anti-gp41-specific NMAb interfered effectively with HIV-1 spread between T cells (26). Inhibitors of the HIV-1 surface glycoprotein (gp120)-CD4 or gp120-CXCR4 interaction reduced X4 HIV-1 VS assembly and viral transfer if applied prior to mixing of infected and receptor-expressing target cells (17, 19), but the effect of these inhibitors has not been tested on preformed VS. Thus, the field is currently unclear on whether direct T-cell-T-cell infectious HIV-1 spread is susceptible or not to antibody and entry inhibitor-mediated disruption of VS assembly, and the related question, whether the VS is permeable to viral entry inhibitors, including NAb. Addressing these questions is of central importance to understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis and informing future drug and vaccine design.Since estimates reported in the literature of the relative efficiency of direct HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread compared to cell-free spread vary by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (6, 38, 42), and the evidence for the activity of viral entry inhibitors on cell-cell spread is conflicting, we set out to quantify the efficiency of infection across the T-cell VS and analyze the susceptibility of this structure to NAb and viral entry inhibitors. Assays reporting on events proximal to productive infection show that the R5 HIV-1 T-cell VS is approximately 1 order of magnitude more efficient than cell-free virus infection, and imaging analyses reveal that the VS assembled by HIV-1 is most likely permeable to inhibitors both during, and subsequent to, VS assembly. Thus, we conclude that the T-cell VS does not provide a privileged environment allowing HIV-1 escape from entry inhibition.     

Transitions to and from the CD4-Bound Conformation Are Modulated by a Single-Residue Change in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Inner Domain

Binding to the primary receptor CD4 induces conformational changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 envelope glycoprotein that allow binding to the coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4) and ultimately trigger viral membrane-cell membrane fusion mediated by the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein. Here we report the derivation of an HIV-1 gp120 variant, H66N, that confers envelope glycoprotein resistance to temperature extremes. The H66N change decreases the spontaneous sampling of the CD4-bound conformation by the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, thus diminishing CD4-independent infection. The H66N change also stabilizes the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex once the CD4-bound state is achieved, decreasing the probability of CD4-induced inactivation and revealing the enhancing effects of soluble CD4 binding on HIV-1 infection. In the CD4-bound conformation, the highly conserved histidine 66 is located between the receptor-binding and gp41-interactive surfaces of gp120. Thus, a single amino acid change in this strategically positioned gp120 inner domain residue influences the propensity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions to and from the CD4-bound state.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the cause of AIDS (6, 29, 66), infects target cells by direct fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. The viral fusion complex is composed of gp120 and gp41 envelope glycoproteins, which are organized into trimeric spikes on the surface of the virus (10, 51, 89). Membrane fusion is initiated by direct binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor on target cells (17, 41, 53). CD4 binding creates a second binding site on gp120 for the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, which serve as coreceptors (3, 12, 19, 23, 25). Coreceptor binding is thought to lead to further conformational changes in the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins that facilitate the fusion of viral and cell membranes. The formation of an energetically stable six-helix bundle by the gp41 ectodomain contributes to the membrane fusion event (9, 10, 79, 89, 90).The energy required for viral membrane-cell membrane fusion derives from the sequential transitions that the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins undergo, from the high-energy unliganded state to the low-energy six-helix bundle. The graded transitions down this energetic slope are initially triggered by CD4 binding (17). The interaction of HIV-1 gp120 with CD4 is accompanied by an unusually large change in entropy, which is thought to indicate the introduction of order into the conformationally flexible unliganded gp120 glycoprotein (61). In the CD4-bound state, gp120 is capable of binding CCR5 with high affinity; moreover, CD4 binding alters the quaternary structure of the envelope glycoprotein complex, resulting in the exposure of gp41 ectodomain segments (27, 45, 77, 92). The stability of the intermediate state induced by CD4 binding depends upon several variables, including the virus (HIV-1 versus HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus [SIV]), the temperature, and the nature of the CD4 ligand (CD4 on a target cell membrane versus soluble forms of CD4 [sCD4]) (30, 73). For HIV-1 exposed to sCD4, if CCR5 binding occurs within a given period of time, progression along the entry pathway continues. If CCR5 binding is impeded or delayed, the CD4-bound envelope glycoprotein complex decays into inactive states (30). In extreme cases, the binding of sCD4 to the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins induces the shedding of gp120 from the envelope glycoprotein trimer (31, 56, 58). Thus, sCD4 generally inhibits HIV-1 infection by triggering inactivation events, in addition to competing with CD4 anchored in the target cell membrane (63).HIV-1 isolates vary in sensitivity to sCD4, due in some cases to a low affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for CD4 and in other cases to differences in propensity to undergo inactivating conformational transitions following CD4 binding (30). HIV-1 isolates that have been passaged extensively in T-cell lines (the tissue culture laboratory-adapted [TCLA] isolates) exhibit lower requirements for CD4 than primary HIV-1 isolates (16, 63, 82). TCLA viruses bind sCD4 efficiently and are generally sensitive to neutralization compared with primary HIV-1 isolates. Differences in sCD4 sensitivity between primary and TCLA HIV-1 strains have been mapped to the major variable loops (V1/V2 and V3) of the gp120 glycoprotein (34, 42, 62, 81). Sensitivity to sCD4 has been shown to be independent of envelope glycoprotein spike density or the intrinsic stability of the envelope glycoprotein complex (30, 35).In general, HIV-1 isolates are more sensitive to sCD4 neutralization than HIV-2 or SIV isolates (4, 14, 73). The relative resistance of SIV to sCD4 neutralization can in some cases be explained by a reduced affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for sCD4 (57); however, at least some SIV isolates exhibit sCD4-induced activation of entry into CD4-negative, CCR5-expressing target cells that lasts for several hours after exposure to sCD4 (73). Thus, for some primate immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins, activated intermediates in the CD4-bound conformation can be quite stable.The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements important for receptor binding, subunit interaction, and membrane fusion are well conserved among different viral strains (71, 91). Thus, these elements represent potential targets for inhibitors of HIV-1 entry. Understanding the structure and longevity of the envelope glycoprotein intermediates along the virus entry pathway is relevant to attempts at inhibition. For example, peptides that target the heptad repeat 1 region of gp41 exhibit major differences in potency against HIV-1 strains related to efficiency of chemokine receptor binding (20, 21), which is thought to promote the conformational transition to the next step in the virus entry cascade. The determinants of the duration of exposure of targetable HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements during the entry process are undefined.To study envelope glycoprotein determinants of the movement among the distinct conformational states along the HIV-1 entry pathway, we attempted to generate HIV-1 variants that exhibit improved stability. Historically, labile viral elements have been stabilized by selecting virus to replicate under conditions, such as high temperature, that typically weaken protein-protein interactions (38, 39, 76, 102). Thus, we subjected HIV-1 to repeated incubations at temperatures between 42°C and 56°C, followed by expansion and analysis of the remaining replication-competent virus fraction. In this manner, we identified an envelope glycoprotein variant, H66N, in which histidine 66 in the gp120 N-terminal segment was altered to asparagine. The resistance of HIV-1 bearing the H66N envelope glycoproteins to changes in temperature has been reported elsewhere (37). Here, we examine the effect of the H66N change on the ability of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions, either spontaneously or in the presence of sCD4. The H66N phenotype was studied in the context of both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent HIV-1 variants.     

Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8+ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid compared to those in blood among antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-positive subjects

During untreated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells partially control HIV replication in peripheral lymphoid tissues, but host mechanisms of HIV control in the central nervous system (CNS) are incompletely understood. We characterized HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood among seven HIV-positive antiretroviral therapy-naïve subjects. All had grossly normal brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy and normal neuropsychometric testing. Frequencies of epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells by direct tetramer staining were on average 2.4-fold higher in CSF than in blood (P = 0.0004), while HIV RNA concentrations were lower. Cells from CSF were readily expanded ex vivo and responded to a broader range of HIV-specific human leukocyte antigen class I restricted optimal peptides than did expanded cells from blood. HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells, in contrast to total CD8⁺ T cells, in CSF and blood were at comparable maturation states, as assessed by CD45RO and CCR7 staining. The strong relationship between higher T-cell frequencies and lower levels of viral antigen in CSF could be the result of increased migration to and/or preferential expansion of HIV-specific T cells within the CNS. This suggests an important role for HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in control of intrathecal viral replication.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) invades the central nervous system (CNS) early during primary infection (21, 30, 35), and proviral DNA persists in the brain throughout the course of HIV-1 disease (7, 25, 29, 47, 77, 83). Limited data from human and nonhuman primate studies suggest that little or no viral replication occurs in the brain during chronic, asymptomatic infection, based on the absence of demonstrable viral RNA or proteins (8, 85). In contrast, cognitive impairment affects approximately 40% of patients who progress to advanced AIDS without highly active antiretroviral therapy (21, 30, 35, 65). During HIV-associated dementia, there is active HIV-1 replication in the brain (23, 52, 61, 81), and viral sequence differences between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral tissues suggest distinct anatomic compartments of replication (18, 19, 22, 53, 75, 76, 78). Host mechanisms that control viral replication in the CNS during chronic, asymptomatic HIV-1 infection are incompletely understood.Anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells are present in blood and peripheral tissues throughout the course of chronic HIV-1 infection (2, 14). Multiple lines of evidence support a critical role for these cells in controlling HIV-1 replication. During acute HIV-1 infection, the appearance of CD8⁺ T-cell responses correlates temporally with a decline in viremia (11, 43), and a greater proliferative capacity of peripheral blood HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells correlates with better control of viremia (36, 54). In addition, the presence of certain major histocompatibility complex class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, notably HLA-B*57, predicts slower progression to AIDS and death during chronic, untreated HIV-1 infection (55, 62). Finally, in the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) model, macaques depleted of CD8⁺ T cells experience increased viremia and rapid disease progression (39, 51, 67).Little is known regarding the role of intrathecal anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells in HIV neuropathogenesis. Nonhuman primate studies have identified SIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the CNS early after infection (16, 80). Increased infiltration of SIV antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes has been detected only in CSF of slow progressors without neurological symptoms (72). In chronically infected macaques with little or no SIV replication in the brain, the frequency of HIV-specific T cells was higher in CSF than in peripheral blood but did not correlate with the level of plasma viremia or CD4⁺ T-cell counts (56). Although intrathecal anti-HIV CD8⁺ T cells may help control viral replication, a detrimental role in the neuropathogenesis of HIV-1 has also been postulated (38). Immune responses contribute to neuropathogenesis in models of other infectious diseases, and during other viral infections cytotoxic T lymphocytes can worsen disease through direct cytotoxicity or release of inflammatory cytokines such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (3, 17, 31, 37, 42, 44, 71).We tested the hypothesis that quantitative and/or qualitative differences in HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses are present in CSF compared to blood during chronic, untreated HIV-1 infection. We characterized HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses in CSF among seven antiretroviral therapy-naïve adults with chronic HIV-1 infection, relatively high peripheral blood CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and low plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations. We show that among these HIV-positive individuals with no neurological symptoms and with little or no HIV-1 RNA in CSF, frequencies of HIV-specific T cells are significantly higher in CSF than in blood. These CSF cells are at a state of differentiation similar to that of T cells in blood and are functionally competent for expansion and IFN-γ production. The higher frequency of functional HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in CSF, in the context of low or undetectable virus in CSF, suggests that these cells play a role in the control of intrathecal viral replication.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

gp340 Promotes Transcytosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Genital Tract-Derived Cell Lines and Primary Endocervical Tissue

The human scavenger receptor gp340 has been identified as a binding protein for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope that is expressed on the cell surface of female genital tract epithelial cells. This interaction allows such epithelial cells to efficiently transmit infective virus to susceptible targets and maintain viral infectivity for several days. Within the context of vaginal transmission, HIV must first traverse a normally protective mucosa containing a cell barrier to reach the underlying T cells and dendritic cells, which propagate and spread the infection. The mechanism by which HIV-1 can bypass an otherwise healthy cellular barrier remains an important area of study. Here, we demonstrate that genital tract-derived cell lines and primary human endocervical tissue can support direct transcytosis of cell-free virus from the apical to basolateral surfaces. Further, this transport of virus can be blocked through the addition of antibodies or peptides that directly block the interaction of gp340 with the HIV-1 envelope, if added prior to viral pulsing on the apical side of the cell or tissue barrier. Our data support a role for the previously described heparan sulfate moieties in mediating this transcytosis but add gp340 as an important facilitator of HIV-1 transcytosis across genital tract tissue. This study demonstrates that HIV-1 actively traverses the protective barriers of the human genital tract and presents a second mechanism whereby gp340 can promote heterosexual transmission.Through correlative studies with macaques challenged with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the initial targets of infection in nontraumatic vaginal exposure to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been identified as subepithelial T cells and dendritic cells (DCs) (18, 23, 31, 36-38). While human transmission may differ from macaque transmission, the existing models of human transmission remain controversial. For the virus to successfully reach its CD4⁺ targets, HIV must first traverse the columnar mucosal epithelial cell barrier of the endocervix or uterus or the stratified squamous barrier of the vagina or ectocervix, whose normal functions include protection of underlying tissue from pathogens. This portion of the human innate immune defense system represents a significant impediment to transmission. Studies have placed the natural transmission rate of HIV per sexual act between 0.005 and 0.3% (17, 45). Breaks in the epithelial barrier caused by secondary infection with other sexual transmitted diseases or the normal physical trauma often associated with vaginal intercourse represent one potential means for viral exposure to submucosal cells and have been shown to significantly increase transmission (reviewed in reference 11). However, studies of nontraumatic exposure to SIV in macaques demonstrate that these disruptions are not necessary for successful transmission to healthy females. This disparity indicates that multiple mechanisms by which HIV-1 can pass through mucosal epithelium might exist in vivo. Identifying these mechanisms represents an important obstacle to understanding and ultimately preventing HIV transmission.Several host cellular receptors, including DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing integrin, galactosyl ceramide, mannose receptor, langerin, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, have been identified that facilitate disease progression through binding of HIV virions without being required for fusion and infection (2, 3, 12, 14, 16, 25, 29, 30, 43, 46, 50). These host accessory proteins act predominately through glycosylation-based interactions between HIV envelope (Env) and the host cellular receptors. These different host accessory factors can lead to increased infectivity in cis and trans or can serve to concentrate and expose virus at sites relevant to furthering its spread within the body. The direct transcytosis of cell-free virus through primary genital epithelial cells and the human endometrial carcinoma cell line HEC1A has been described (7, 9); this is, in part, mediated by HSPGs (7). Within the HSPG family, the syndecans have been previously shown to facilitate trans infection of HIV in vitro through binding of a specific region of Env that is moderately conserved (7, 8). This report also demonstrates that while HSPGs mediate a portion of the viral transcytosis that occurs in these two cell types, a significant portion of the observed transport occurs through an HSPG-independent mechanism. Other host cell factors likely provide alternatives to HSPGs for HIV-1 to use in subverting the mucosal epithelial barrier.gp340 is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) family of innate immune receptors. Its numerous splice variants can be found as a secreted component of human saliva (34, 41, 42) and as a membrane-associated receptor in a large number of epithelial cell lineages (22, 32, 40). Its normal cellular function includes immune surveillance of bacteria (4-6, 44), interaction with influenza A virus (19, 20, 32, 51) and surfactant proteins in the lung (20, 22, 33), and facilitating epithelial cell regeneration at sites of cellular inflammation and damage (27, 32). The secreted form of gp340, salivary agglutinin (SAG), was identified as a component of saliva that inhibits HIV-1 transmission in the oral pharynx through a specific interaction with the viral envelope protein that serves to agglutinate the virus and target it for degradation (34, 35, 41). Interestingly, SAG was demonstrated to form a direct protein-protein interaction with HIV Env (53, 54). Later, a cell surface-associated variant of SAG called gp340 was characterized as a binding partner for HIV-1 in the female genital tract that could facilitate virus transmission to susceptible targets of infection (47) and as a macrophage-expressed enhancer of infection (10).     

Evolution of the HIV-1 env Gene in the Rag2?/? γC?/? Humanized Mouse Model

Rag2^−/− γ_C^−/− mice transplanted with human hematopoietic stem cells (DKO-hu-HSC mice) mimic aspects of human infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), including sustained viral replication and CD4⁺ T-cell decline. However, the extent of HIV-1 evolution during long-term infection in these humanized mice, a key feature of the natural infection, has not been assessed fully. In this study, we examined the types of genotypic and phenotypic changes in the viral env gene that occur in the viral populations of DKO-hu-HSC mice infected with the CCR5-tropic isolate HIV-1_JRCSF for up to 44 weeks. The mean rate of divergence of viral populations in mice was similar to that observed in a cohort of humans during a similar period of infection. Many amino acid substitutions were common across mice, including losses of N-linked glycosylation sites and substitutions in the CD4 binding site and in CD4-induced epitopes, indicating common selective pressures between mice. In addition, env variants evolved sensitivity to antibodies directed at V3, suggesting a more open conformation for Env. This phenotypic change was associated with increased CD4 binding efficiency and was attributed to specific amino acid substitutions. In one mouse, env variants emerged that exhibited a CXCR4-tropic phenotype. These sequences were compartmentalized in the mesenteric lymph node. In summary, viral populations in these mice exhibited dynamic behavior that included sequence evolution, compartmentalization, and the appearance of distinct phenotypic changes. Thus, humanized mice offer a useful model for studying evolutionary processes of HIV-1 in a complex host environment.Animal models of HIV-1 infection are important tools for studying transmission, replication, and pathogenesis, as well as therapeutic intervention, of HIV-1 infection. Nonhuman primates such as rhesus macaques, infected with simian or chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency viruses (SIV or SHIV, respectively), represent well-characterized and highly relevant models; however, key limitations include expense, genetic variability of the host animals, and the fact that SIV, while closely related, is distinct from HIV-1. Therefore, small animal models that support HIV-1 infection and recapitulate many aspects of the human infection have been sought using several approaches.Recent approaches have involved the use of genetically immunodeficient mice that have been reconstituted using human-derived hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) (known as humanized mice). Several models have been developed based on this approach, including Rag2^−/− γ_C^−/− (DKO) and NOD/SCID/γ_C^−/− (NOG or NSG) mice transplanted with human HSC (DKO-hu-HSC or NOG-hu-HSC mice) (40, 92) and the NOD/SCID mouse with transplanted human fetal thymus and liver tissue in addition to HSC (62). These models all support HIV-1 infection (1, 3, 6, 30, 87, 96, 102; for a review of these models, see the work of Denton and Garcia [22]). The DKO-hu-HSC mouse lacks both recombination activating gene 2 (Rag2) and the cytokine receptor common gamma chain (γ_C), and as a result, it does not generate murine T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells but supports engraftment of HSC and differentiation of human myeloid and lymphoid lineages. Immune reconstitution in this model likely involves education of human T cells in the mouse thymus and dissemination of differentiated human lymphoid subsets into the peripheral blood and to multiple lymphoid tissues, including lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow (92). The DKO-hu-HSC mouse, along with the other humanized mouse models, has been used in studies of transmission (5, 21), pathogenesis (43), and viral inhibition (16, 21, 53, 88, 94).One important feature of HIV-1 infection is the diversification and evolution of the viral genome over the course of infection. Diversification occurs most prominently in the envelope (env) gene, which encodes the viral surface glycoprotein (Env). Env mediates viral entry into cells through attachment to the primary receptor CD4, which primes Env for engagement with a coreceptor, either CCR5 or CXCR4, triggering virion fusion with the cellular plasma membrane (54). HIV-1 infection is typically established by one or a few CCR5-tropic (R5) variants that give rise to an initially homogenous viral population, which then diversifies over the course of chronic infection (45, 84). Diversification of Env results from immune selective pressures (27), isolation in or adaptation to different cellular and anatomical compartments (20, 28, 33, 46, 51), and selection for altered CD4 affinity (72, 90, 95) and coreceptor tropism (26, 39). In many cases, during late-stage infection, variants emerge from the R5 virus population that are CXCR4 tropic (X4), an event that is often associated with accelerated CD4 T-cell loss and progression to AIDS (9, 18, 89). In an effort to determine if any of these aspects of HIV-1 evolution are exhibited in the humanized mouse model, we examined the extent of HIV-1 diversification and the types of evolutionary changes that occur in env in mice infected with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 for up to 44 weeks.Sampling of viral env variants from the peripheral blood plasma over the course of the infection revealed increasing diversity and divergence of the viral population at rates similar to those observed in natural infection. Mutations were identified that affected Env conformation and sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies, CXCR4 coreceptor use, and potential N-linked glycosylation sites. Other mutations potentially affecting the Env phenotype were identified in CD4 binding sites and CD4-induced epitopes. The patterns of substitutions indicated that certain sites were under selection, particularly in cases where the same substitution was identified in multiple mice.This study demonstrates the potential for studying HIV-1 evolution in the DKO-hu-HSC mouse model and also gives insight into the types of selective pressures driving HIV-1 env evolution in this host environment. These findings, while highlighting some of the limitations of this model, will help to inform its appropriate use for studying different aspects of HIV-1 infection, such as the evolutionary constraints placed on HIV-1 during natural infection and in the face of pharmacological and immunological inhibition.     

Balancing Reversion of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte and Neutralizing Antibody Escape Mutations within Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env upon Transmission

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope protein (Env) is subject to both neutralizing antibody (NAb) and CD8 T-cell (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte [CTL]) immune pressure. We studied the reversion of the Env CTL escape mutant virus to the wild type and the relationship between the reversion of CTL mutations with N-linked glycosylation site (NLGS)-driven NAb escape in pigtailed macaques. Env CTL mutations either did not revert to the wild type or only transiently reverted 5 to 7 weeks after infection. The CTL escape mutant reversion was coincident, for the same viral clones, with the loss of NLGS mutations. At one site studied, both CTL and NLGS mutations were needed to confer NAb escape. We conclude that CTL and NAb escape within Env can be tightly linked, suggesting opportunities to induce effective multicomponent anti-Env immunity.CD8 T-cell responses against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have long been observed to select for viral variants that avoid cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) recognition (2, 5, 15, 18, 27). These immune escape mutations may, however, result in reduced replication competence (“fitness cost”) (11, 20, 26). CTL escape variants have been shown to revert to the wild type (WT) upon passage to major histocompatibility complex-mismatched hosts, both in macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) or chimeric SIV/HIV (SHIV) infection (11, 12) and in humans with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection (1, 19).Most analyses of CTL escape and reversion have studied Gag CTL epitopes known to facilitate control of viremia (7, 14, 21, 30). Fewer analyses have studied Env-specific CTL epitopes. Recent sequencing studies suggest the potential for mutations within predicted HIV-1 Env-specific CTL epitopes to undergo reversion to the WT (16, 23). Env-specific CTL responses may, however, have less impact on viral control of both HIV-1 and SIV/SHIV than do Gag CTL responses (17, 24, 25), presumably reflecting either less-potent inhibition of viral replication or minimal fitness cost of escape (9).Serial viral escape from antibody pressure also occurs in both macaques and humans (3, 13, 28). Env is extensively glycosylated, and this “evolving glycan shield” can sterically block antibody binding without mutation at the antibody-binding site (8, 16, 31). Mutations at glycosylation sites, as well as other mutations, are associated with escape from neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses (4, 13, 29). Mutations in the amino acid sequences of N-linked glycosylation sites (NLGS) can alter the packing of the glycan cloud that surrounds the virion, by a loss, gain, or shift of an NLGS (32), thus facilitating NAb escape.Env is the only viral protein targeted by both CTL and NAb responses. The serial viral escape from both Env-specific CTL and NAb responses could have implications for viral fitness and the reversion of multiple mutations upon transmission to naïve hosts.We previously identified three common HIV-1 Env-specific CD8 T cell epitopes, RY8_788-795, SP9_110-118, and NL9_671-679, and their immune escape patterns in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) infected with SHIV_mn229 (25). SHIV_mn229 is a chimeric virus constructed from an SIV_mac239 backbone and an HIV-1_HXB2 env fragment that was passaged through macaques to become pathogenic (11). This earlier work provided an opportunity for detailed studies of how viruses with Env-specific CTL escape mutations, as well as mutations in adjacent NLGS, evolve when transmitted to naïve pigtail macaques.     

Cell-Cell Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Overcomes Tetherin/BST-2-Mediated Restriction in T cells

Direct cell-to-cell spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) between T cells at the virological synapse (VS) is an efficient mechanism of viral dissemination. Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is an interferon-induced, antiretroviral restriction factor that inhibits nascent cell-free particle release. The HIV-1 Vpu protein antagonizes tetherin activity; however, whether tetherin also restricts cell-cell spread is unclear. We performed quantitative cell-to-cell transfer analysis of wild-type (WT) or Vpu-defective HIV-1 in Jurkat and primary CD4⁺ T cells, both of which express endogenous levels of tetherin. We found that Vpu-defective HIV-1 appeared to disseminate more efficiently by cell-to-cell contact between Jurkat cells under conditions where tetherin restricted cell-free virion release. In T cells infected with Vpu-defective HIV-1, tetherin was enriched at the VS, and VS formation was increased compared to the WT, correlating with an accumulation of virus envelope proteins on the cell surface. Increasing tetherin expression with type I interferon had only minor effects on cell-to-cell transmission. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of tetherin decreased VS formation and cell-to-cell transmission of both Vpu-defective and WT HIV-1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that tetherin does not restrict VS-mediated T cell-to-T cell transfer of Vpu-defective HIV-1 and suggest that under some circumstances tetherin might promote cell-to-cell transfer, either by mediating the accumulation of virions on the cell surface or by regulating integrity of the VS. If so, inhibition of tetherin activity by Vpu may balance requirements for efficient cell-free virion production and cell-to-cell transfer of HIV-1 in the face of antiviral immune responses.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can disseminate between and within hosts by cell-free infection or by direct cell-cell spread. Cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between CD4⁺ T cells is an efficient means of viral dissemination (65) and has been estimated to be several orders of magnitude more rapid than cell-free virus infection (6, 8, 41, 64, 74). Cell-cell transmission of HIV-1 takes place at the virological synapse (VS), a multimolecular structure that forms at the interface between an HIV-1-infected T cell and an uninfected target T cell during intercellular contact (27). Related structures that facilitate cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between dendritic cells and T cells (42) and between macrophages and T cells (16, 17) and for cell-cell spread of the related retrovirus human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) (24) have also been described. Moreover, more long-range cell-cell transfer can occur via cellular projections, including filopodia (71) and membrane nanotubes (75). The VS is initiated by binding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env), which is expressed on the surfaces of infected T cells, to HIV-1 entry receptors (CD4 and either CXCR4 or CCR5) present on the target cell membrane (6, 22, 27, 41, 61, 73). Interactions between LFA-1 and ICAM-1 and ICAM-3 further stabilize the conjugate interface and, together with Env receptor binding, help trigger the recruitment of viral proteins, CD4/coreceptor, and integrins to the contact site (27, 28, 61). The enrichment of viral and cellular proteins at the VS is an active process, dependent on cytoskeletal remodeling, and in the infected T cell both the actin and tubulin network regulate polarization of HIV-1 proteins at the cell-cell interface, thus directing HIV-1 assembly and egress toward the engaged target cell (27, 29). Virus is transferred by budding into the synaptic cleft, and virions subsequently attach to the target cell membrane to mediate entry, either by fusion at the plasma membrane or possibly following endocytic uptake (2, 22). In this way, the VS promotes more rapid infection kinetics and may enhance HIV-1 pathogenesis in vivo.Cells have evolved a number of barriers to resist invading microorganisms. One mechanism that appears to be particularly important in counteracting HIV-1 infection is a group of interferon-inducible, innate restriction factors that includes TRIM5α, APOBEC3G, and tetherin (38, 49, 69, 79). Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is a host protein expressed by many cell types, including CD4⁺ T cells, that acts at a late stage of the HIV-1 life cycle to trap (or “tether”) mature virions at the plasma membranes of virus-producing cells, thereby inhibiting cell-free virus release (49, 56, 81). This antiviral activity of tetherin is not restricted to HIV-1, and tetherin can also inhibit the release of other enveloped viruses from infected cells (31, 40, 54, 62). What the cellular function of tetherin is besides its antiviral activity is unclear, but because expression is upregulated following alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) treatment (1) and tetherin can restrict a range of enveloped viruses, tetherin has been postulated to be a broad-acting mediator of the innate immune defense against enveloped viruses.To circumvent restriction of particle release, HIV-1 encodes the 16-kDa accessory protein Vpu, which antagonizes tetherin and restores normal virus budding (47, 78). The molecular mechanisms by which Vpu does this are not entirely clear, but evidence suggests that Vpu may exert its antagonistic function by downregulating tetherin from the cell surface, trapping it in the trans-Golgi network (10) and targeting it for degradation by the proteasome (12, 39, 81) or lysosome (9, 25, 44); however, degradation of tetherin may be dispensable for Vpu activity (13), and in HIV-1-infected T cells, surface downregulation of tetherin has been reported to be minor (45), suggesting that global removal of tetherin from the plasma membrane may not be necessary to antagonize its function.Tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 and antagonism by Vpu have been the focus of much research, and inhibition of cell-free virus infection has been well documented (33, 47-49, 77, 81, 82). In contrast, less studied is the impact of tetherin on direct cell-cell dissemination. For example, it is not clear if tetherin-mediated restriction inhibits T cell-T cell spread as efficiently as cell-free release or whether tetherin affects VS formation. To address these questions, we analyzed Vpu⁺ and Vpu⁻ viruses for their ability to spread directly between Jurkat T cells and primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence or absence of endogenous tetherin. Our data suggest that tetherin does not restrict HIV-1 in the context of cell-to-cell transmission of virus between T cells expressing endogenous tetherin. Interestingly, we also that observed that Vpu-defective virus may disseminate more efficiently by cell-cell spread at the VS. We postulate that cell-cell spread may favor viral pathogenesis by allowing HIV-1 to disseminate in the presence of tetherin during an interferon-producing innate response.