Molecular chaperones in biology and medicine at Obernai

No Abstract Available     

Molecular biology and pathogenesis of hepatitis E virus

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a small RNA virus and the etiological agent for hepatitis E, a form of acute viral hepatitis. The virus has a feco-oral transmission cycle and is transmitted through environmental contamination, mainly through drinking water. Recent studies on the isolation of HEV-like viruses from animal species also suggest zoonotic transfer of the virus. The absence of small animal models of infection and efficient cell culture systems has precluded virological studies on the replication cycle and pathogenesis of HEV. A vaccine against HEV has undergone successful clinical testing and diagnostic tests are available. This review describes HEV epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, molecular virology and the host response to HEV infection. The focus is on published literature in the past decade. Equal contribution     

Complex between glycoproteins gI and gp63 of pseudorabies virus: its effect on virus replication.

To ascertain the biological functions of different glycoproteins that are nonessential for pseudorabies virus growth in vitro, we have constructed mutants defective in one (or a combination) of these glycoproteins and have examined various aspects of their role in the infective process. We made the following two observations. (i) Glycoproteins gI and gp63 are noncovalently complexed to each other. They are coprecipitated by antisera against either one of these glycoproteins but do not share antigenic determinants: monoclonal antibodies against gp63 do not immunoprecipitate gI from extracts of gp63- mutant-infected cells, and monoclonal antibodies against gI do not immunoprecipitate gp63 from extracts of gI- mutant-infected cells. (ii) Mutants unable to synthesize either gI or gp63 have some common biological characteristics; they have a growth advantage in primary chicken embryo fibroblasts. Furthermore, we have shown previously that in conjunction with glycoprotein gIII, gI and gp63 are necessary for the expression of virulence (T. C. Mettenleiter, C. Schreurs, F. Zuckermann, T. Ben-Porat, and A. S. Kaplan, J. Virol. 62, 2712-2717, 1988). These results show that the functional entity affecting virus replication in chicken embryo fibroblasts, as well as affecting virulence, is the complex between gI and gp63. The gI-gp63 complex of pseudorabies virus does not appear to have Fc receptor activity as does its homolog, the gI-gE complex of herpes simplex virus.     

Identification and characterization of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein H.

On the basis of DNA sequence analysis, it has recently been shown that the pseudorabies virus (PrV) genome encodes a protein homologous to glycoprotein H (gH) of other herpesviruses (B. Klupp and T.C. Mettenleiter, Virology 182:732-741, 1991). To obtain antibodies specific for gH(PrV), rabbits were immunized with synthetic peptides representing two potential epitopes on gH(PrV) as predicted by computer analysis. The antipeptide sera recognized the gH precursor polypeptide pgH translated in vitro from an in vitro-transcribed mRNA. Western blot (immunoblot) analyses of purified pseudorabies virions using these antisera revealed specific reactivity with a protein with an apparent molecular mass of 95 kDa. Specificity of the reaction could be demonstrated by competition experiments with respective peptides. Analysis of PrV deletion mutants defective in genes encoding known glycoproteins proved that gH(PrV) constitutes a novel PrV glycoprotein not previously found. Treatment of purified virion preparations with endoglycosidase H reduced the apparent molecular mass of gH(PrV) to 90 kDa, indicating the presence of N-linked high-mannose (or hybrid) carbohydrates in mature virions. Removal of all N-linked carbohydrates by N-glycosidase F resulted in a product of 76 kDa. In summary, our results demonstrate the existence of gH in PrV as a structural component of the virion.     

Glycoprotein gIII of pseudorabies virus is multifunctional.

One of the major glycoproteins of pseudorabies virus, gIII, is nonessential for growth in cell culture. Mutants defective in gIII, however, consistently yield lower titers of infectious virus (3- to 20-fold) than does wild-type virus. The interactions of gIII- mutants with their host cells were compared with those of wild-type virus in an attempt to uncover the functions of gIII. We show that gIII plays a major role in the stable adsorption of the virus to its host cell; in the absence of gIII, the rate of adsorption is reduced and adsorption is easily reversed by washing. Thus, adsorption of pseudorabies virus can be said to occur in at least the following two ways: (i) a gIII-mediated rapid adsorption or (ii) a slower and more labile adsorption that is independent of gIII. After virions have been complexed with monoclonal antibodies against gIII (but not some monoclonal antibodies against other glycoproteins), both modes of adsorption were inhibited. Glycoprotein gIII affects virus stability and virus release, as well as adsorption. The effect on virus release is marked when the virus is defective in additional functions. Thus, although we found no obvious difference in the release of virus from gIII- or wild-type virus-infected rabbit kidney cells, release of a gIII-/gI- double mutant from the cells occurred less readily than did release of a gI- mutant. The gIII-/gI- and gIII- mutants, however, adsorbed to cells at a similar rate, indicating that the effects of gIII on adsorption and virus release constitute separate functions. The Bartha vaccine strain of pseudorabies virus has a defective gIII gene and is released poorly from rabbit kidney cells. After the resident Bartha gIII gene was replaced by the gIII gene of wild-type virus, virus release was enhanced considerably. Since inactivation of gIII in wild-type pseudorabies virus did not significantly affect virus release, the Bartha strain must be defective in another function which, in conjunction with gIII, significantly affects virus release. These results indicate again that gIII affects virus release in conjunction with other functions. Also, although the Bartha strain was functionally defective in virus release, it adsorbed to cells as well as wild-type virus did, showing that the effects of gIII on virus adsorption and release constitute separate functions. We conclude that gIII is a multifunctional glycoprotein.     

Adaptability in herpesviruses: glycoprotein D-independent infectivity of pseudorabies virus.

Initial contact between herpesviruses and host cells is mediated by virion envelope glycoproteins which bind to cellular receptors. In several alphaherpesviruses, the nonessential glycoprotein gC has been found to interact with cell surface proteoglycans, whereas the essential glycoprotein gD is involved in stable secondary attachment. In addition, gD is necessary for penetration, which involves fusion between virion envelope and cellular cytoplasmic membrane. As opposed to other alphaherpesvirus gD homologs, pseudorabies virus (PrV) gD is not required for direct viral cell-to-cell spread. Therefore, gD- PrV can be passaged in noncomplementing cells by cocultivating infected and noninfected cells. Whereas infectivity was found to be strictly cell associated in early passages, repeated passaging resulted in the appearance of infectivity in the supernatant, finally reaching titers as high as 10(7) PFU/ml (PrV gD- Pass). Filtration experiments indicated that this infectivity was not due to the presence of infected cells, and the absence of gD was verified by Southern and Western blotting and by virus neutralization. Infection of bovine kidney cells constitutively expressing PrV gD interfered with the infectivity of wild-type PrV but did not inhibit that of PrV gD- Pass. Similar results were obtained after passaging of a second PrV mutant, PrV-376, which in addition to gD also lacks gG, gI, and gE. Penetration assays demonstrated that PrV gD- Pass entered cells much more slowly than wild-type PrV. In summary, our data demonstrate the existence of a gD-independent mode of initiation of infection in PrV and indicate that the essential function(s) that gD performs in wild-type PrV infection can be compensated for after passaging. Therefore, regarding the requirement for gD, PrV seems to be intermediate between herpes simplex virus type 1, in which gD is necessary for penetration and cell-to-cell spread, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which lacks a gD gene. Our data show that the relevance of an essential protein can change under selective pressure and thus demonstrate a way in which VZV could have evolved from a PrV-like ancestor.