胰腺癌患者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化及联合诊断的ROC曲线分析

目的:探讨胰腺癌患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原242(CA242)、糖类抗原199(CA199)水平变化,并分析上述指标对胰腺癌的联合诊断价值,为胰腺癌的临床诊断提供参考。方法:选择2014年2月至2018年2月我院收治的186例胰腺癌患者(胰腺癌组)、89例胰腺炎患者(胰腺炎组)作为研究对象,并取同期来我院检查的268例健康人作为对照组。比较三组受试者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化,对比分析血清CEA、CA242、CA199的单一以及联合诊断的准确度、特异度以及灵敏度,并绘制ROC曲线以分析上述指标的诊断价值。结果:三组受试者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。且胰腺炎组和胰腺癌组的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于对照组,胰腺癌组患者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于胰腺炎组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,CEA诊断价值最大,CA199诊断价值最小。CEA是胰腺癌单项肿瘤标志物中敏感度最高的,为85.48%;特异度最高的为CA242(96.72%);三项肿瘤标志物联合诊断的准确度增加至92.27%,敏感度增加至95.16%,特异度相比略有下降。结论:与单一肿瘤标记物诊断胰腺癌相比,CEA、CA242、CA199联合诊断的敏感度和准确度均明显升高,可以明显改善胰腺癌的漏诊率,提高患者的生存率,具有较好的临床应用价值。     

Laminin,gamma 2 (LAMC2): A Promising New Putative Pancreatic Cancer Biomarker Identified by Proteomic Analysis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Tissues

In pancreatic cancer, the incidence and mortality curves coincide. One major reason for this high mortality rate in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients is the dearth of effective diagnostic, prognostic, and disease-monitoring biomarkers. Unfortunately, existing tumor markers, as well as current imaging modalities, are not sufficiently sensitive and/or specific for early-stage diagnosis. There is, therefore, an urgent need for improved serum markers of the disease. Herein, we performed Orbitrap® mass spectrometry proteomic analysis of four PDAC tissues and their adjacent benign tissues and identified a total of 2190 nonredundant proteins. Sixteen promising candidates were selected for further scrutiny using a systematic scoring algorithm. Our preliminary serum verification of the top four candidates (DSP, LAMC2, GP73, and DSG2) in 20 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 20 with benign pancreatic cysts, showed a significant (p < 0.05) elevation of LAMC2 in pancreatic cancer serum. Extensive validation of LAMC2 in healthy, benign, and PDAC sera from geographically diverse cohorts (n = 425) (Japan, Europe, and USA) demonstrated a significant increase in levels in early-stage PDAC compared with benign diseases. The sensitivity of LAMC2 was comparable to CA19.9 in all data sets, with an AUC value greater than 0.85 in discriminating healthy patients from early-stage PDAC patients. LAMC2 exhibited diagnostic complementarity with CA19.9 by showing significant (p < 0.001 in two out of three cohorts) elevation in PDAC patients with clinically low CA19.9 levels.Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)¹ is one of the most devastating cancers and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in North America (1). Ninety-five percent of patients will not survive beyond five years; this high mortality rate is primarily attributed to the lack of effective diagnostic techniques and treatment regimens. The hallmark features of pancreatic cancer (PC) are late presentation and aggressive metastatic progression (2, 3). The National Cancer Institute statistics estimate that approximately $1.9 billion is being spent in the United States alone each year on PC diagnosis and treatment. PDAC is classified into resectable (∼10–20%), locally advanced unresectable (∼30–40%), and metastatic (∼50%) (3). PDAC diagnosed at resectable stage can possibly be cured with complete surgical removal. This could improve the survival rates and considerably lower treatment costs. It is projected that 20–40% of patients with resectable PDAC survive more than five years after complete surgical removal, highlighting the importance of early-stage diagnosis. Unfortunately, carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19.9), the current standard serum tumor marker for PDAC, has certain limitations as an early detection biomarker (its sensitivity for small tumors {<3 cm} is ∼50% and it is significantly elevated in many benign conditions (e.g. biliary obstruction, hepatic cirrhosis, chronic pancreatitis)) (4, 5). In light of the scarcity of other, more reliable markers, CA19.9 is currently used in the clinic as a prognostic and surveillance marker. Undoubtedly, the need for a more reliable consistent biomarker (or biomarker panel) for early PDAC diagnosis remains unmet. In pursuit of novel PDAC biomarker candidates, we have previously delineated the proteomes of malignant pancreatic ascitic fluids, pools of pancreatic juice, and pancreatic cancer cell lines (BxPC3, CAPAN, CFPAC1, MIA-Paca2, PANC1, and SU.86.86). We identified a panel of five potential candidate biomarkers, which, in combination, slightly outperformed CA19.9 in a pilot verification study (40 individuals; 20 healthy, and 20 PDAC) (6).From a different perspective, in the current study, we deployed a comparative quantitative tissue proteomic methodology to compare the proteome of malignant pancreatic tissues with that of their adjacent normal counterparts. A total of 2190 nonredundant proteins were identified, which were further scrutinized using a systematic scoring algorithm based on their quantified cancer-versus-normal ratios, on their identification in malignant pancreatic ascites fluid, on their cancer-specific nature, and on their tissue-expression profiles. Our analysis resulted in sixteen promising candidate biomarkers, which fulfilled our criteria and selected for further validation studies. In a multistep validation approach, the selected candidates were first verified in serum samples obtained from 20 patients with benign pancreatic diseases and 20 patients with pancreatic cancer, using commercially available ELISA kits. The best candidate (LAMC2) was further tested in three geographically diverse cohorts from Germany, Japan, and the US composed of 435 serum samples from healthy, benign, and early and late stage cancer patients. Our approach brought to light a previously unknown, promising PDAC candidate biomarker, LAMC2.     

血清miR-92a在胰腺癌诊断及预后评估中的临床意义研究

目的:探讨血清miR-92a在胰腺癌诊断和预后分析中的价值,为胰腺癌早诊断以及预后评估提供潜在的分子标志物。方法:回顾性分析我院及重庆医科大学附属第一、第二医院2014年8月~2016年12月收治的30例胰腺癌未转移患者、30例胰腺癌转移患者和30例慢性胰腺炎患者的临床资料,另选择同期在我院进行健康体检的30例健康人作为健康组。收集血清,应用定量PCR法检测各组血清miR-92a的表达水平,利用化学发光法检测各组血清中的糖蛋白抗原19-9(CA-19-9)含量。以ROC分析比较血清miR-92a与CA 19-9在胰腺癌诊断中的特异度、敏感性。结果:胰腺癌未转移组患者和胰腺癌转移组患者血清中miR-92a水平显著高于健康组和慢性胰腺炎组(P0.05),胰腺癌转移组患者血清中miR-92a水平显著高于胰腺癌未转移组患者(P0.05)。胰腺癌未转移组患者和胰腺癌转移组患者血清中CA19-9水平显著高于健康组和慢性胰腺炎组(P0.05)。miR-92a诊断胰腺癌的敏感度高于CA19-9和miR-92a+CA 19-9,而miR-92a+CA 19-9诊断胰腺癌的特异度显著高于miR-92a和CA19-9(P0.05),且有较高的胰腺癌转移预测应用价值。结论:血清miR-92a联合CA 19-9检测能够诊断胰腺癌,具有良好的敏感度和特异度,miR-92a还具有较好的胰腺癌转移预测价值,可作为胰腺癌早期无创筛查方法加以应用。     

Carbohydrate markers of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in the world and the sixth in Europe. Pancreatic cancer is more frequent in males than females. Worldwide, following diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, <2% of patients survive for 5 years, 8% survive for 2 years and <50% survive for only approx. 3 months. The biggest risk factor in pancreatic cancer is age, with a peak of morbidity at 65 years. Difficulty in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer causes a delay in its detection. It is one of the most difficult cancers to diagnose and therefore to treat successfully. Additional detection of carbohydrate markers may offer a better diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Carbohydrate markers of cancer may be produced by the cancer itself or by the body in response to cancer, whose presence in body fluids suggests the presence and growth of the cancer. The most widely used, and best-recognized, carbohydrate marker of pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9 [CA (carbohydrate antigen) 19-9]. However, the relatively non-specific nature of CA 19-9 limits its routine use in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but it may be useful in monitoring treatment of pancreatic cancer (e.g. the effectiveness of chemotherapy), as a complement to other diagnostic methods. Some other carbohydrate markers of pancreatic cancer may be considered, such as CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), CA 50 and CA 242, and the mucins MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC, but enzymes involved in the processing of glycoconjugates could also be involved. Our preliminary research shows that the activity of lysosomal exoglycosidases, including HEX (N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase), GAL (β-D-galactosidase), FUC (α-L-fucosidase) and MAN (α-D-mannosidase), in serum and urine may be used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.     

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a comparative clinical study between CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 50

Seventy-eight patients were evaluated to ascertain the usefulness of markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer, using a less specific marker (CEA) as reference. Three groups were considered: a) 36 controls; b) 22 patients with benign obstructive jaundice; c) 20 patients with pancreatic cancer. Preoperative blood samples were obtained to ascertain CEA (E.I.A.), CA 19-9 (R.I.A.) and CA 50 (T.R.-F.I.A.). Serum concentrations of the various markers were significantly higher for patients with pancreatic cancer in comparison with the other groups, at cut-offs of 10 ng/ml (CEA), 100 ng/ml (CA 19-9) and 170 U/ml (CA 50). The sensitivity of CA 19-9 (94%) and CA 50 (88%) was much greater than that of CEA (30%). The specificity of the three markers in patients with pancreatic cancer, with respect to the control group, was 100% and this figure is reduced with respect to the group suffering from benign obstructive jaundice (CEA: 90%; CA 19-9: 88% and CA 50: 87%). Diagnostic results (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (P.P.V.) and negative predictive value (N.P.V.] did not significantly increase with respect to CA 19-9 and CA 50 when considered individually. It is concluded that the serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 50 showed high sensitivity and specificity as markers of pancreatic cancer with respect to the other groups, pointing towards clinical routine clinical use of both markers. In addition, a comparative study of the literature has been made and prospects for short-term development and concrete applications for early and reliable diagnosis have been highlighted.     

血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

目的:探讨血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统在乳腺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法:临床确诊的乳腺癌患者307例为乳腺癌组,非乳腺癌的其他恶性肿瘤患者495例为对照组。应用多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统检测12种肿瘤标志物水平,评价血清肿瘤标志物的在乳腺癌组与对照组之间的差异。结果:CA153,CEA,Free-PSA这三项指标为诊断乳腺癌的独立相关因素(P<0.05),比较三项指标ROC曲线下面积可见,CA153对于鉴别乳腺癌准确性更高,其敏感性、特异性分别为78.92和56.14,女性乳腺癌患者Free-PSA可见明显升高,对乳腺癌有特殊提示意义,手术前后标志物CA199、CA242、Ferrin、CA125水平差异有统计学意义。结论:在临床常用的肿瘤标记物中,CA153,CEA,Free_PSA水平的升高与乳腺癌发生独立相关,其中CA153具有更高的诊断准确性,Free_PSA水平升高对乳腺癌的诊断有特别提示意义。     

CA19-9及CA72-4联合检测在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值

目的:探究联合检测血清糖类抗原(CA)19-9和CA72-4水平在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性选取我院2016年1月～2017年12月收治的72例胰腺癌患者作为胰腺癌组,以同期住院的68例良性胰腺病患者作为良性胰腺疾病组,同时纳入67例健康体检者作为对照组。检测三组人群血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)及曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估各单项检测指标及联合检测指标对胰腺癌特异性诊断的价值。结果:胰腺癌组患者血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平分别为(137.69±25.32)U/mL和(6.96±1.25)U/mL,显著高于良性胰腺疾病组和对照组(P0.05)。血清CA19-9和CA72-4联合检测诊断胰腺癌的ROC曲线AUC高于其单独检测(P0.05),CA19-9和CA72-4的最佳临界值分别为86.94 U/m L和4.23 U/m L,此时联合检测诊断胰腺癌的敏感性为94.7%,特异性为95.2%。结论:联合检测血清CA19-9和CA72-4诊断胰腺癌的临床价值明显优于其单独检测。     

Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Circulating YKL-40, IL-6, and CA 19.9 in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Purpose

We tested the hypothesis that high plasma YKL-40 and IL-6 associate with pancreatic cancer and short overall survival.

Patients and Methods

In all, 559 patients with pancreatic cancer from prospective biomarker studies from Denmark (n = 448) and Germany (n = 111) were studied. Plasma YKL-40 and IL-6 were determined by ELISAs and serum CA 19.9 by chemiluminescent immunometric assay.

Results

Odds ratios (ORs) for prediction of pancreatic cancer were significant for all biomarkers, with CA 19.9 having the highest AUC (CA 19.9: OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.97 to 2.68, p<0.0001, AUC = 0.94; YKL-40: OR = 4.50, 3.99 to 5.08, p<0.0001, AUC = 0.87; IL-6: OR = 3.68, 3.08 to 4.44, p<0.0001, AUC = 0.87). Multivariate Cox analysis (YKL-40, IL-6, CA 19.9, age, stage, gender) in patients operated on showed that high preoperative IL-6 and CA 19.9 (dichotomized according to normal values) were independently associated with short overall survival (CA 19.9: HR = 2.51, 1.22–5.15, p = 0.013; IL-6: HR = 2.03, 1.11 to 3.70, p = 0.021). Multivariate Cox analysis of non-operable patients (Stage IIB-IV) showed that high pre-treatment levels of each biomarker were independently associated with short overall survival (YKL-40: HR = 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64, p = 0.029; IL-6: HR = 1.71, 1.33 to 2.20, p<0.0001; CA 19.9: HR = 1.54, 1.06 to 2.24, p = 0.022). Patients with preoperative elevation of both IL-6 and CA 19.9 had shorter overall survival (p<0.005) compared to patients with normal levels of both biomarkers (45% vs. 92% alive after 12 months).

Conclusions

Plasma YKL-40 and IL-6 had less diagnostic impact than CA 19.9. Combination of pretreatment YKL-40, IL-6, and CA 19.9 may have clinical value to identify pancreatic cancer patients with the poorest prognosis.     

糖类抗原153在恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值

目的:采用电化学免疫发光法探讨糖类抗原153在不同恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析CA153对807例恶性肿瘤患者的诊断价值,包括胰腺癌162例、结肠癌101例、胃癌139例、肺癌131例、乳腺癌101例、宫颈癌65例和前列腺癌108例。结果:与健康对照组比较,糖类抗原153在7种肿瘤中的含量均有显著性升高。与乳腺癌组相比,除肺癌组异常率无统计学差异外,其余各组均有统计学差异。CA153对于乳腺癌的诊断价值最高,灵敏性和特异性分别为70.4%和56.7%。结论:血清CA153水平的检测对恶性肿瘤的诊断具有一定的临床应用价值,但其灵敏性和特异性均不高,证明单一标志物对于肿瘤的诊断价值有限。     

Relationship of CA 125 and CA 19.9 with lung carcinoma histological subtype: preliminary study

The aim of this work was to study the possible utility of simultaneous determination of CA 125 and CA 19.9 in patients with lung cancer. Serum levels of both markers were studied in 87 patients without metastases (Mo), 72 patients with distant metastases (MT) and 15 cases without clinical evidence of disease after primary treatment (NED). Sixty-five tumors were epidermoid, 34 were adenocarcinomas, 24 were cell undifferentiated carcinomas and 51 were small-cell carcinomas. Sera from 75 healthy subjects and 20 patients with benign lung disease were used as controls. The cut-off values used were 35 and 37 U/ml for CA 125 and CA 19.9, respectively. CA 125 and CA 19.9 serum levels were within normal limits in all control patients. In NED patients these markers were not elevated, except in one with chronic liver disease who showed elevated CA 19.9 (76 U/ml). Twenty-five percent of Mo lung cancer patients and 40.3% of MT cases had CA 19.9 over 37 U/ml. Abnormally high levels of CA 125 were found in 18.7% and 22.9% of Mo and MT patients, respectively. Sixty percent of patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinoma had elevated CA 125 (mean 176 U/ml) compared to 15.4% of patients with all other histological types of tumors combined (54.3 U/ml, p less than 0.01). CA 19.9 serum levels were also more often elevated in patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinomas (50%, 7/14 cases) than in other histological types (30%, 36/120 patients), but the difference was not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检联合基因检测对胰腺癌的诊断价值

目的:研究超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)联合K-ras基因检测对胰腺癌的诊断价值,为临床诊疗提供依据。方法:选取2013年11月到2015年11月我院收治的胰腺占位病变患者90例,患者入院次日行EUS-FNA,检测患者血清及活检物中K-ras基因阳性率,比较EUS-FNA单独与EUS-FNA联合K-ras基因检测对胰腺癌诊断的准确率与敏感性。结果:90例胰腺占位病变者中,经病理证实胰腺癌56例,EUS-FNA单独与EUS-FNA联合K-ras基因分别检出胰腺癌50例、53例,准确率分别为89.29%、94.64%,敏感性分别为92.59%、98.15%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。胰腺癌患者活检物中K-ras阳性率为83.93%,明显高于血清中的41.07%(P0.05)。结论:EUS-FNA联合K-ras基因检测可提高对胰腺癌诊断的准确率与敏感性。     

Serum tumor markers may precede instrumental response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer

PURPOSE: Although serum tumor markers (STMs) are widely used in clinical practice, their predictive role for the response to anticancer treatment is still controversial. The correlation of CEA, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CA 125 (only with peritoneal involvement) and NSE levels with imaging response and clinical benefit was investigated in 60 non-selected patients with metastatic epithelial cancers treated by single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: STM measurement was performed at baseline and subsequently every three to four weeks. We applied the WHO criteria to evaluate both STM and instrumental responses. Concordance analysis was performed by the Cohen Kw index, and the significance of the results was established using the Fleiss, Cohen & Everitt test. Qualitative interpretation of data was obtained with the Landis & Koch scale. Correlations of STM response with clinical benefit (PS or pain improvement) were evaluated by the chi-square test. RESULTS: The primary tumors included breast cancers (38 patients), gastrointestinal non-colorectal cancers (12 patients), and lung cancers (10 patients). An overall significant good degree of agreement was observed between STM and instrumental response (p < 0.0005). The degree of agreement for each marker was as follows: excellent for CEA (p < 0.0005) and CA 125 (p = 0.006), good for CA 15.3 (p < 0.0005) and CA 19.9 (p = 0.011). Restricted analysis for the correlation of each marker with primary tumor origin showed good prediction of radiological response for CA 15.3 and CEA in breast cancer patients (p<0.0005 for both), for CEA and CA 19.9 in gastrointestinal cancer patients (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and for CEA+NSE in lung cancer patients (p = 0.01). Conversely, STM response did not correlate significantly with the clinical benefit for the patients, both in terms of PS and pain improvement (p = 0.24 and p=0.42, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed STMs to be good predictors of tumor response. Although STMs cannot replace diagnostic imaging, in metastatic cancer they might be useful to optimize the timing of radiological re-evaluation in the palliative setting.     

CT联合肿瘤标志物与MRI联合肿瘤标志物对于直肠癌患者术前诊断 的准确率与特异性的研究

目的:探讨CT联合肿瘤标志物与MRI联合肿瘤标志物对于直肠癌患者术前诊断的准确率与特异性,为大肠癌的术前诊断提供一定的理论依据。方法:选取我院在2015年01月至2016年01月间收治的86例直肠癌患者以及64例肠道良性病变患者分别作为观察组I组和观察II组的研究对象,另外选取来我院进行健康体检的80例人员作为对照组研究,分别分析CT联合肿瘤标志物与MRI联合肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA125、CA199、CA242、CA724)对大肠癌患者诊断的准确率与特异性之间的差别。结果:观察I组肿瘤标志物水平要明显高于观察II组和对照组,差异显著,具有统计学意义;肿瘤标志物CEA、CA125、CA199、CA242、CA724对大肠癌患者检测的阳性率分别为67.44%(58/86)、26.74%(23/86)、84.88%(73/86)、72.09%(62/86)、33.72%(29/86),肿瘤标志物并联检测对大肠癌的阳性检测率为94.19%(81/86)。CT联合肿瘤标志物对大肠癌的准确率为97.67%(84/86),特异性为94.44%(136/144);MRI联合肿瘤标志物对大肠癌的阳性检测率为100.00%(86/86),特异性为98.61%(142/144)。结论:CT联合肿瘤标志物对大肠癌诊断的准确率与特异性均不如MRI联合肿瘤标志物,因此MRI联合肿瘤标志物可作为大肠癌除病理学鉴定外最佳的诊断方式。     

血清和胸水中CA125在结核性和癌性胸水中的表达及临床意义

目的:探讨血清和胸水中CA125在结核性和癌性胸水中的表达及鉴别诊断意义。方法:抽选我院确诊的结核性胸水病人85例(结核组)和癌性胸水病人71例(癌症组),检测两组患者血清和胸水中CA125表达,并以胸水/血清中CA125比值10(p-CA125/s-CA12510)为临界值,观察其对癌性胸水的鉴别特异度、灵敏度及准确性。结果:癌症组胸水中CA125表达及p-CA125/s-CA125比值均显著高于结核组(P0.05);但血清中两组CA125表达比较差异无显著性(P0.05);两组胸水中,以35U/ml为临界值,两组患者阳性率92.9%(79/85)、100%(71/71)比较差异无显著性(X2=7.0718,P=0.0078)。癌症组中p-CA125/sCA125比值10的比率(84.5%VS 17.6%)明显高于结核组(X2=66.6244,P=0.0000);并以其为诊断癌性胸水的临界值,鉴别诊断特异度、灵敏度及准确性分别为82.3%、84.5%、83.3%。结论:血清和胸水中CA125表达对于鉴别结核性或者是癌性胸水的临床意义不大,但是p-CA125/s-CA125比值对于鉴别结核性和癌性胸水具有一定临床价值。     

多种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床意义分析

目的:探讨CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测对肺癌的诊、诊断的敏感度以及特异性。方法:对我院收治的确诊为肺癌的患者选取120例作为A组,同期选择肺部良性病变患者61例作为B组,以及50例健康体检患者作为C组,将三组研究对象分别进行CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的检测。结果:A组患者CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的血清中含量明显高于B组以及C组(P<0.05);五种标记物联合检测的敏感度明显高于单一标志物的敏感度(P<0.05),但其特异性有明显的降低(P<0.05)。结论:采用CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测,对肺癌的早期诊断以及治疗预后有较好的指导作用。     

胰腺癌相关肿瘤标志物研究进展

胰腺癌起病隐匿,进展快,预后差,发病率约等于死亡率。胰腺癌死亡率高的原因有发病机制不明,缺乏有效的早期诊断和预后的肿瘤标志物,进展期相关治疗效果不理想。近年来在血清标志物、基因标志物、表观遗传学标志物等分子生物技术及生物信息学方面的发展为胰腺癌的诊断,尤其是早期诊断、评估预后和监测早期复发提供了新的途径。本文就近期胰腺癌相关肿瘤标志物的研究进展作一综述。     

钼靶X线摄片联合肿瘤相关标志物检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值

目的:探讨乳腺钼靶X射线摄片与血清糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和骨桥蛋白(OPN)联合检测对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值。方法:选择在我院经手术和病理证实为乳腺癌的患者60例作为研究组,另选取60例健康体检者作为对照组。分别检测两组的血清CA15-3、CEA和OPN水平,并采用乳腺钼靶X射线检查。比较X射与血清学检测单独检测及联合检测的阳性率。结果:研究组患者血清CA15-3、CEA及OPN水平均显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);血清CA15-3、CEA、OPN和钼靶X射线摄片联合检测的敏感性显著高于单独检测,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对乳腺癌患者进行钼靶X射线摄片及肿瘤相关标志物检测可提高阳性检出率,有利于乳腺癌的早期诊断及治疗。     

血清CA72-4、CA199对结直肠癌的诊断价值及与肿瘤进展的关系研究

摘要 目的：探讨血清糖类抗原72-4（CA72-4）、糖类抗原199（CA199）对结直肠癌的诊断价值及与肿瘤进展的关系。方法：选取2016年7月到2018年7月期间在我院接受治疗的结直肠癌患者60例作为结直肠癌组,另选取同期在我院接受治疗的结直肠良性病变患者40例作为良性病变组,比较结直肠癌组、良性病变组血清CA72-4、CA199的水平,比较不同TNM分期、不同分化程度的结直肠癌患者血清CA72-4、CA199的水平,以病理诊断为金标准,分析血清CA72-4、CA199对结直肠癌的诊断价值。结果：结直肠癌组的血清CA72-4、CA199水平高于良性病变组（P<0.05）。TNM分期为III-IV期的结直肠癌患者的血清CA72-4、CA199水平高于I-II期的患者（P<0.05）,分化程度为低分化的结直肠癌患者的血清CA72-4、CA199水平高于中高分化的患者（P<0.05）。CA72-4联合CA199检测对结直肠癌的灵敏度高于CA72-4、CA199单独检测。结论：CA72-4与CA199联合检测对结直肠癌具有较高的诊断价值,且两指标的水平与结直肠癌的分化程度和TNM分期有关,可在一定程度上反映肿瘤进展情况。     

Establishment and characterization of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line in tissue culture and the nude mouse

We established a human pancreatic carcinoma cell line, designated SPH, from cancerous ascites of a 57-year-old male patient with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The cells have been cultured for 32 months with RPMI-1640 medium supplemental with 10% fetal calf serum. The population doubling time of this cell line was about 35 h, and the modal number of chromosomes was 85 at passage 20. The cells produced CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-2 in the conditioned medium and formed tumors in nude mice, the histology of which was similar to that of the primary tumor. Based on these findings, this cell line is considered to be a very useful model for studying many aspects of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer cell biology.     

血清肿瘤标志物联合多层螺旋CT和核磁共振对胆管癌的诊断价值及其与组织侵袭分子的关系分析

目的:探讨血清癌抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、多层螺旋CT和核磁共振(MRI)联合检测对胆管癌的诊断价值,并分析肿瘤标志物与组织侵袭分子的相关性。方法:选择2017年1月至2018年8月赤峰学院附属医院收治的胆管癌患者62例作为胆管癌组,另选择同期我院收治的胆管良性病变患者55例作为胆管良性病变组。比较两组血清CA19-9、CA125水平以及组织侵袭分子含量,观察胆管癌患者和胆管良性病变患者的多层螺旋CT和MRI影像学征象,分析血清CA19-9、CA125、多层螺旋CT和MRI对胆管癌的诊断价值,并分析血清CA19-9、CA125水平与组织侵袭分子含量的相关性。结果:胆管癌组血清CA19-9、CA125水平高于胆总管良性病变组,胆管癌组织赖氨酰氧化酶样蛋白-2(LOXL2)、瞬时受体电位阳离子通道7(TRPM7)含量高于胆总管良性病变组,组织E钙黏素(E-cadherin)含量低于胆总管良性病变组(P0.05)。多层螺旋CT影像学征象:胆管癌可见胆总管、肝管内圆形或类圆形高密度影伴有管壁浸润,胆管内出现不规则结节,肿块与周围组织界限模糊,胆囊管及胆囊颈部浸润,肝叶萎缩,淋巴结肿大等;胆管良性病变则多为圆形或类圆形高密度影,管壁浸润、淋巴结肿大并不多见。MRI影像学征象:胆管癌肝内胆管与肝组织分界不清,肿块呈不规则或分叶状,胆囊增大,肝内外胆管不同程度扩张,胰管扩张,肝叶萎缩,淋巴结肿大;胆管良性病变胆管则多为"杯口状"低信号充盈缺损,胆管梗阻上方出现"鸟嘴样"改变等。血清CA19-9、CA125、多层螺旋CT和MRI联合检测对胆管癌诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确度均高于CA19-9、CA 125、多层螺旋CT、MRI单独诊断。胆管癌患者血清CA19-9、CA125水平与组织LOXL2、TRPM7含量呈正相关,与组织E-cadherin含量呈负相关(P0.05)。结论:血清CA19-9、CA125、多层螺旋CT和MRI联合检测对胆管癌诊断具有较好的价值,患者血清CA19-9、CA125水平与组织侵袭分子存在相关性,可以为胆管癌恶性程度的评估提供依据。