Retina and lens regeneration in anuran amphibians

Anuran amphibians can regenerate the retina through differentiation of stem cells in the ciliary marginal zone and through transdifferentiation of the retinal pigmented epithelium. By contrast, the regeneration of the lens has been demonstrated only in larvae of species belonging to the Xenopus genus, where the lens regenerates through transdifferentiation of the outer cornea. Retinal pigmented epithelium to neural retina and outer cornea to lens transdifferentiation processes are triggered and sustained by signaling molecules belonging to the family of the fibroblast growth factor. Both during retina and lens regeneration there is a re-activation of many of the genes which are activated during development of the eye, even though the spatial and temporal pattern of gene expression is not a simple repetition of that found in development.     

Cornea-lens transdifferentiation in the anuran, Xenopus tropicalis

Previously, the only anuran amphibian known to regenerate the lens of the eye was Xenopus laevis. This occurs during larval stages through transdifferentiation of the outer cornea epithelium under control of factors presumably secreted by the neural retina. This study demonstrates that a distantly related species, X. tropicalis, is also able to regenerate lenses through this process. A transgenic line of X. tropicalis was used to examine the process of cornea-lens transdifferentiation in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) is expressed in differentiated lens cells under the control of the Xenopus gamma1-crystallin promoter element. Unlike X. laevis, the process of cornea-lens transdifferentiation typically occurs at a very low frequency in X. tropicalis due to the rapid rate at which the inner cornea endothelium heals to recover the pupillary opening. The inner cornea endothelium serves as a key physical barrier that normally prevents retinal signals from reaching the outer cornea epithelium. If this barrier is circumvented by implanting outer cornea epithelium of transgenic tadpoles directly into the vitreous chamber of non-transgenic X. tropicalis larval eyes, a higher percentage of cases formed lenses expressing GFP. Lenses were also formed if these tissues were implanted into X. laevis larval eyes, suggesting the same or similar inducing factors are present in both species. When pericorneal ectoderm and posteriolateral flank ectoderm were implanted into the vitreous chamber, only in rare cases did pericorneal ectoderm form lens cells. Thus, unlike the case in X. laevis, competence to respond to the inducing factors is tightly restricted to the cornea epithelium in X. tropicalis. As controls, all these tissues were implanted into the space located between the inner and outer corneas. None of these implants, including outer cornea epithelium, exhibited GFP expression. Thus, the essential inductive factors are normally contained within the vitreous chamber. One explanation why this type of lens regeneration is not seen in some other anurans could be due to the rapid rate at which the inner cornea endothelium heals to recover the pupillary opening once the original lens is removed. These findings are discussed in terms of the evolution of this developmental process within the anurans.     

Transdifferentiation of ocular tissues in larval Xenopus laevis

Transdifferentiation phenomena offer a useful opportunity to study experimentally the mechanisms on which cell phenotypic stability depends. The capacities of vertebrate eye tissues to reprogram cell differentiation are well known in avian and mammalian embryos, and in larval and adult newt. From research into the capacity of anuran eye tissues to reprogram differentiation into a new pathway, considerable data have accumulated concerning the transdifferentiative capacities of eye tissues in larval Xenopus laevis. This work reviews the data concerning the transdifferentiative phenomena of eye tissues in that species and, based on these, aims to establish the extent of our knowledge about the mechanism controlling these processes. In larval Xenopus laevis the outer cornea can regenerate a lens by a lens-transdifferentiation process triggered and substained by a factor(s), probably of a protein nature, produced by the neural retina. In a normal eye phenotypic stability of the outer cornea is guaranteed by the presence of the inner cornea and lens, which prevent the spread of retinal factor(s). The stimulus for lens transdifferentiation of the outer cornea can be supplied by other tissues as well, but this capacity is not widely distributed. The iris and retinal pigmented epithelium can transdifferentiate into neural retina if isolated from the surrounding tissues and implanted in the vitreous chamber. As for lens transdifferentiation of the outer cornea, retinal transdifferentiation of the iris can be stimulated by certain nonocular tissues as well.     

Neural retinal regeneration in the anuran amphibian Xenopus laevis post-metamorphosis: transdifferentiation of retinal pigmented epithelium regenerates the neural retina

In urodele amphibians like the newt, complete retina and lens regeneration occurs throughout their lives. In contrast, anuran amphibians retain this capacity only in the larval stage and quickly lose it during metamorphosis. It is believed that they are unable to regenerate these tissues after metamorphosis. However, contrary to this generally accepted notion, here we report that both the neural retina (NR) and lens regenerate following the surgical removal of these tissues in the anuran amphibian, Xenopus laevis, even in the mature animal. The NR regenerated both from the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells by transdifferentiation and from the stem cells in the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) by differentiation. In the early stage of NR regeneration (5-10 days post operation), RPE cells appeared to delaminate from the RPE layer and adhere to the remaining retinal vascular membrane. Thereafter, they underwent transdifferentiation to regenerate the NR layer. An in vitro culture study also revealed that RPE cells differentiated into neurons and that this was accelerated by the presence of FGF-2 and IGF-1. The source of the regenerating lens appeared to be remaining lens epithelium, suggesting that this is a kind of repair process rather than regeneration. Thus, we show for the first time that anuran amphibians retain the capacity for retinal regeneration after metamorphosis, similarly to urodeles, but that the mode of regeneration differs between the two orders. Our study provides a new tool for the molecular analysis of regulatory mechanisms involved in retinal and lens regeneration by providing an alternative animal model to the newt, the only other experimental model.     

Experimental analysis of lens-forming capacity in Xenopus borealis larvae

Previously, the only anuran amphibians known to have the capacity to regenerate a lens after lentectomy were Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis. This regeneration process occurs during the larval life through transdifferentiation of the outer cornea promoted by inductive factors produced by the retina and accumulated inside the vitreous chamber. However, the capacity of X. tropicalis to regenerate a lens is much lower than that of X. laevis. This study demonstrates that Xenopus borealis, a species more closely related to X. laevis than to X. tropicalis, is not able to regenerate a lens after lentectomy. Nevertheless, some morphological modifications corresponding to the first stages of lens regeneration in X. laevis were observed in the outer cornea of X. borealis. This suggested that in X borealis the regeneration process was blocked at early stages. Results from histological analysis of X. borealis and X. laevis lentectomized eyes and from implantation of outer cornea fragments into the vitreous and anterior chambers demonstrated that: (i) in X. borealis eye, the lens-forming competence in the outer cornea and inductive factors in the vitreous chamber are both present, (ii) no inhibiting factors are present in the anterior chamber, the environment where lens regeneration begins, (iii) the inability of X. borealis to regenerate a lens after lentectomy is due to an inhibiting action exerted by the inner cornea on the spreading of the retinal factor from the vitreous chamber towards the outer cornea. This mechanical inhibition is assured by two distinctive features of X. borealis eye in comparison with X. laevis eye: (i) a weaker and slower response to the retinal inducer by the outer cornea; (ii) a stronger and faster healing of the inner cornea. Unlike X. tropicalis and similar to X. laevis, in X. borealis the competence to respond to the retinal factor is not restricted to the corneal epithelium but also extends to the pericorneal epidermis.     

Complete reconstruction of the retinal laminar structure from a cultured retinal pigment epithelium is triggered by altered tissue interaction and promoted by overlaid extracellular matrices

The retina regenerates from retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells by transdifferentiation in the adult newt and Xenopus laevis when it is surgically removed. This was studied under a novel culture condition, and we succeeded, for the first time, in developing a complete retinal laminar structure from a single epithelial sheet of RPE. We cultured a Xenopus RPE monolayer sheet isolated from the choroid on a filter cup with gels overlaid and found that the retinal tissue structure differentiated with all retinal layers present. In the culture, RPE cells isolated themselves from the culture substratum (filter membrane), migrated, and reattached to the overlaid gel, on which they initiated transdifferentiation. This was exactly the same as observed during in vivo retina regeneration of X. laevis. In contrast, when RPE monolayers were cultured similarly without isolation from the choroid, RPE cells proliferated, but remained pigmented instead of transdifferentiating, indicating that alteration in tissue interaction triggers transdifferentiation. We then examined under the conventional tissue culture condition whether altered RPE‐choroid interaction induces Pax6 expression. Pax6 was upregulated in RPE cells soon after they were removed from the choroid, and this expression was not dependent of FGF2. FGF2 administration was needed for RPE cells to maintain Pax6 expression. From the present results, in addition to our previous ones, we propose a two‐step mechanism of transdifferentiation: the first step is a reversible process and is initiated by the alteration of the cell‐extracellular matrix and/or cell–cell interaction followed by Pax6 upregulation. FGF2 plays a key role in driving RPE cells into the second step, during which they differentiate into retinal stem cells. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol, 2009     

MEK mediates in vitro neural transdifferentiation of the adult newt retinal pigment epithelium cells: Is FGF2 an induction factor?

Adult newts can regenerate their entire retinas through transdifferentiation of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. As yet, however, underlying molecular mechanisms remain virtually unknown. On the other hand, in embryonic/larval vertebrates, an MEK [mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) kinase] pathway activated by fibroblast growth factor‐2 (FGF2) is suggested to be involved in the induction of transdifferentiation of the RPE into a neural retina. Therefore, we examined using culture systems whether the FGF2/MEK pathway is also involved in the adult newt RPE transdifferentiation. Here we show that the adult newt RPE cells can switch to neural cells expressing pan‐retinal‐neuron (PRN) markers such as acetylated tubulin, and that an MEK pathway is essential for the induction of this process, whereas FGF2 seems an unlikely primary induction factor. In addition, we show by immunohistochemistry that the PRN markers are not expressed until the 1–3 cells thick regenerating retina, which contains retinal progenitor cells, appears. Our current results suggest that the activation of an MEK pathway in RPE cells might be involved in the induction process of retinal regeneration in the adult newt, however if this is the case, we must assume complementary mechanisms that repress the MEK‐mediated misexpression of PRN markers in the initial process of transdifferentiation.     

Targeted expression of the dominant-negative FGFR4a in the eye using Xrx1A regulatory sequences interferes with normal retinal development

Molecular analysis of vertebrate eye development has been hampered by the availability of sequences that can selectively direct gene expression in the developing eye. We report the characterization of the regulatory sequences of the Xenopus laevis Rx1A gene that can direct gene expression in the retinal progenitor cells. We have used these sequences to investigate the role of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling in the development of retinal cell types. FGFs are signaling molecules that are crucial for correct patterning of the embryo and that play important roles in the development of several embryonic tissues. FGFs and their receptors are expressed in the developing retina, and FGF receptor-mediated signaling has been implicated to have a role in the specification and survival of retinal cell types. We investigated the role of FGF signaling mediated by FGF receptor 4a in the development of retinal cell types in Xenopus laevis. For this purpose, we have made transgenic Xenopus tadpoles in which the dominant-negative FGFR4a (Delta FGFR4a) coding region was linked to the newly characterized regulatory sequences of the Xrx1A gene. We found that the expression of Delta FGFR4a in retinal progenitor cells results in abnormal retinal development. The retinas of transgenic animals expressing Delta FGFR4a show disorganized cell layering and specifically lack photoreceptor cells. These experiments show that FGFR4a-mediated FGF signaling is necessary for the correct specification of retinal cell types. Furthermore, they demonstrate that constructs using Xrx1A regulatory sequences are excellent tools with which to study the developmental processes involved in retinal formation.     

MEK mediates in vitro neural transdifferentiation of the adult newt retinal pigment epithelium cells: Is FGF2 an induction factor?

Adult newts can regenerate their entire retinas through transdifferentiation of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. As yet, however, underlying molecular mechanisms remain virtually unknown. On the other hand, in embryonic/larval vertebrates, an MEK [mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase] pathway activated by fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) is suggested to be involved in the induction of transdifferentiation of the RPE into a neural retina. Therefore, we examined using culture systems whether the FGF2/MEK pathway is also involved in the adult newt RPE transdifferentiation. Here we show that the adult newt RPE cells can switch to neural cells expressing pan-retinal-neuron (PRN) markers such as acetylated tubulin, and that an MEK pathway is essential for the induction of this process, whereas FGF2 seems an unlikely primary induction factor. In addition, we show by immunohistochemistry that the PRN markers are not expressed until the 1-3 cells thick regenerating retina, which contains retinal progenitor cells, appears. Our current results suggest that the activation of an MEK pathway in RPE cells might be involved in the induction process of retinal regeneration in the adult newt, however if this is the case, we must assume complementary mechanisms that repress the MEK-mediated misexpression of PRN markers in the initial process of transdifferentiation.     

Tissue interaction between the retinal pigment epithelium and the choroid triggers retinal regeneration of the newt Cynops pyrrhogaster

Complete retinal regeneration in adult animals occurs only in certain urodele amphibians, in which the retinal pigmented epithelial cells (RPE) undergo transdifferentiation to produce all cell types constituting the neural retina. A similar mechanism also appears to be involved in retinal regeneration in the embryonic stage of some other species, but the nature of this mechanism has not yet been elucidated. The organ culture model of retinal regeneration is a useful experimental system and we previously reported RPE transdifferentiation of the newt under this condition. Here, we show that cultured RPE cells proliferate and differentiate into neurons when cultured with the choroid attached to the RPE, but they did not exhibit any morphological changes when cultured alone following removal of the choroid. This finding indicates that the tissue interactions between the RPE and the choroid are essential for the former to proliferate. This tissue interaction appears to be mediated by diffusible factors, because the choroid could affect RPE cells even when the two tissues were separated by a membrane filter. RPE transdifferentiation under the organotypic culture condition was abolished by a MEK (ERK kinase) inhibitor, U0126, but was partially suppressed by an FGF receptor inhibitor, SU5402, suggesting that FGF signaling pathway has a central role in the transdifferentiation. While IGF-1 alone had no effect on isolated RPE, combination of FGF-2 and IGF-1 stimulated RPE cell transdifferentiation similar to the results obtained in organ-cultured RPE and choroid. RT-PCR revealed that gene expression of both FGF-2 and IGF-1 is up-regulated following removal of the retina. Thus, we show for the first time that the choroid plays an essential role in newt retinal regeneration, opening a new avenue for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying retinal regeneration.     

Retinoic acid regulation by CYP26 in vertebrate lens regeneration

Xenopus laevis is among the few species that are capable of fully regenerating a lost lens de novo. This occurs upon removal of the lens, when secreted factors from the retina are permitted to reach the cornea epithelium and trigger it to form a new lens. Although many studies have investigated the retinal factors that initiate lens regeneration, relatively little is known about what factors support this process and make the cornea competent to form a lens. We presently investigate the role of Retinoic acid (RA) signaling in lens regeneration in Xenopus. RA is a highly important morphogen during vertebrate development, including the development of various eye tissues, and has been previously implicated in several regenerative processes as well. For instance, Wolffian lens regeneration in the newt requires active RA signaling. In contrast, we provide evidence here that lens regeneration in Xenopus actually depends on the attenuation of RA signaling, which is regulated by the RA-degrading enzyme CYP26. Using RT-PCR we examined the expression of RA synthesis and metabolism related genes within ocular tissues. We found expression of aldh1a1, aldh1a2, and aldh1a3, as well as cyp26a1 and cyp26b1 in both normal and regenerating corneal tissue. On the other hand, cyp26c1 does not appear to be expressed in either control or regenerating corneas, but it is expressed in the lens. Additionally in the lens, we found expression of aldh1a1 and aldh1a2, but not aldh1a3. Using an inhibitor of CYP26, and separately using exogenous retinoids, as well as RA signaling inhibitors, we demonstrate that CYP26 activity is necessary for lens regeneration to occur. We also find using phosphorylated Histone H3 labeling that CYP26 antagonism reduces cell proliferation in the cornea, and using qPCR we find that exogenous retinoids alter the expression of putative corneal stem cell markers. Furthermore, the Xenopus cornea is composed of an outer layer and inner basal epithelium, as well as a deeper fibrillar layer sparsely populated with cells. We employed antibody staining to visualize the localization of CYP26A, CYP26B, and RALDH1 within these corneal layers. Immunohistochemical staining of these enzymes revealed that all 3 proteins are expressed in both the outer and basal layers. CYP26A appears to be unique in also being present in the deeper fibrillar layer, which may contain cornea stem cells. This study reveals a clear molecular difference between newt and Xenopus lens regeneration, and it implicates CYP26 in the latter regenerative process.     

Activin signaling limits the competence for retinal regeneration from the pigmented epithelium

Regeneration of the retina in amphibians is initiated by the transdifferentiation of the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) into neural progenitors. A similar process occurs in the early embryonic chick, but the RPE soon loses this ability. The factors that limit the competence of RPE cells to regenerate neural retina are not understood; however, factors normally involved in the development of the eye (i.e. FGF and Pax6) have also been implicated in transdifferentiation. Therefore, we tested whether activin, a TGFbeta family signaling protein shown to be important in RPE development, contributes to the loss in competence of the RPE to regenerate retina. We have found that addition of activin blocks regeneration from the RPE, even during stages when the cells are competent. Conversely, a small molecule inhibitor of the activin/TGFbeta/nodal receptors can delay, and even reverse, the developmental restriction in FGF-stimulated neural retinal regeneration.     

Regeneration of the amphibian retina: role of tissue interaction and related signaling molecules on RPE transdifferentiation

Regeneration of eye tissue is one of the classic subjects in developmental biology and it is now being vigorously studied to reveal the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved. Although many experimental animal models have been studied, there may be a common basic mechanism that governs retinal regeneration. This can also control ocular development, suggesting the existence of a common principle between the development and regeneration of eye tissues. This notion is now becoming more widely accepted by recent studies on the genetic regulation of ocular development. Retinal regeneration can take place in a variety of vertebrates including fish, amphibians and birds. The newt, however, has been considered to be the sole animal that can regenerate the whole retina after the complete removal of the retina. We recently discovered that the anuran amphibian also retains a similar ability in the mature stage, suggesting the possibility that such a potential could be found in other animal species. In the present review article, retinal regeneration of amphibians (the newt and Xenopus laevis) and avian embryos are described, with a particular focus on transdifferentiation of retinal pigmented epithelium. One of the recent progresses in this field is the availability of tissue culture methods to analyze the initial process of transdifferentiation, and this enables us to compare the proliferation and neural differentiation of retinal pigmented epithelial cells from various animal species under the same conditions. It was revealed that tissue interactions between the retinal pigmented epithelium and underlying connective tissues (the choroid) play a substantial role in transdifferentiation and that this is mediated by a diffusible signal such as fibroblast growth factor 2. We propose that tissue interaction, particularly mesenchyme-neuroepithelial interaction, is considered to play a fundamental role both in retinal development and regeneration.     

Retinal stem/progenitor cells in the ciliary marginal zone complete retinal regeneration: A study of retinal regeneration in a novel animal model

Our research group has extensively studied retinal regeneration in adult Xenopus laevis. However, X. laevis does not represent a suitable model for multigenerational genetics and genomic approaches. Instead, Xenopus tropicalis is considered as the ideal model for these studies, although little is known about retinal regeneration in X. tropicalis. In the present study, we showed that a complete retina regenerates at approximately 30 days after whole retinal removal. The regenerating retina was derived from the stem/progenitor cells in the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ), indicating a novel mode of vertebrate retinal regeneration, which has not been previously reported. In a previous study, we showed that in X. laevis, retinal regeneration occurs primarily through the transdifferentiation of retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells. RPE cells migrate to the retinal vascular membrane and reform a new epithelium, which then differentiates into the retina. In X. tropicalis, RPE cells also migrated to the vascular membrane, but transdifferentiation was not evident. Using two tissue culture models of RPE tissues, it was shown that in X. laevis RPE culture neuronal differentiation and reconstruction of the retinal three‐dimensional (3‐D) structure were clearly observed, while in X. tropicalis RPE culture neither ßIII tubulin‐positive cells nor 3‐D retinal structure were seen. These results indicate that the two Xenopus species are excellent models to clarify the cellular and molecular mechanisms of retinal regeneration, as these animals have contrasting modes of regeneration; one mode primarily involves RPE cells and the other mode involves stem/progenitor cells in the CMZ. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 74: 739–756, 2014     

FGFR2b signaling regulates ex vivo submandibular gland epithelial cell proliferation and branching morphogenesis

Branching morphogenesis of mouse submandibular glands is regulated by multiple growth factors. Here, we report that ex vivo branching of intact submandibular glands decreases when either FGFR2 expression is downregulated or soluble recombinant FGFR2b competes out the endogenous growth factors. However, a combination of neutralizing antibodies to FGF1, FGF7 and FGF10 is required to inhibit branching in the intact gland, suggesting that multiple FGF isoforms are required for branching. Exogenous FGFs added to submandibular epithelial rudiments cultured without mesenchyme induce distinct morphologies. FGF7 induces epithelial budding, whereas FGF10 induces duct elongation, and both are inhibited by FGFR or ERK1/2 signaling inhibitors. However, a PI3-kinase inhibitor also decreases FGF7-mediated epithelial budding, suggesting that multiple signaling pathways exist. We immunolocalized FGF receptors and analyzed changes in FGFR, FGF and MMP gene expression to identify the mechanisms of FGF-mediated morphogenesis. FGFR1b and FGFR2b are present throughout the epithelium, although FGFR1b is more highly expressed around the periphery of the buds and the duct tips. FGF7 signaling increases FGFR1b and FGF1 expression, and MMP2 activity, when compared with FGF10, resulting in increased cell proliferation and expansion of the epithelial bud, whereas FGF10 stimulates localized proliferation at the tip of the duct. FGF7- and FGF10-mediated morphogenesis is inhibited by an MMP inhibitor and a neutralizing antibody to FGF1, suggesting that both FGF1 and MMPs are essential downstream mediators of epithelial morphogenesis. Taken together, our data suggests that FGFR2b signaling involves a regulatory network of FGFR1b/FGF1/MMP2 expression that mediates budding and duct elongation during branching morphogenesis.     

Retinal stem cells and regeneration

The optic vesicle gives rise to several very different epithelial tissues, including the neural retina, the pigmented epithelium, the iris, the ciliary epithelium of the ciliary body and the optic stalk. Retinal regeneration can arise from several different cellular sources; in some species, the process involves interconversion, or transdifferentiation, among cells of the different tissue types. Therefore, prior to a discussion of retinal regeneration, we will briefly discuss current knowledge about the influence of signaling molecules in cell fate determination in ocular tissues. Next, we will detail the evidence for neurogenesis in the mature retina. Lastly, we will describe various types of regenerative phenomena that occur in the retina, from complete regeneration of functional retina in fish and amphibians, to the more limited neuronal production that occurs in avian and mammalian retinas.     

Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Soluble Receptor 1 Acts as a Natural Inhibitor of FGF2 Neurotrophic Activity during Retinal Degeneration

Fibroblast growth factors (FGF) 1 and 2 and their tyrosine kinase receptor (FGFR) are present throughout the adult retina. FGFs are potential mitogens, but adult retinal cells are maintained in a nonproliferative state unless the retina is damaged. Our work aims to find a modulator of FGF signaling in normal and pathological retina. We identified and sequenced a truncated FGFR1 form from rat retina generated by the use of selective polyadenylation sites. This 70-kDa form of soluble extracellular FGFR1 (SR1) was distributed mainly localized in the inner nuclear layer of the retina, whereas the full-length FGFR1 form was detected in the retinal Muller glial cells. FGF2 and FGFR1 mRNA levels greatly increased in light-induced retinal degeneration. FGFR1 was detected in the radial fibers of activated retinal Muller glial cells. In contrast, SR1 mRNA synthesis followed a biphasic pattern of down- and up-regulation, and anti-SR1 staining was intense in retinal pigmented epithelial cells. The synthesis of SR1 and FGFR1 specifically and independently regulated in normal and degenerating retina suggests that changes in the proportion of various FGFR forms may control the bioavailability of FGFs and thus their potential as neurotrophic factors. This was demonstrated in vivo during retinal degeneration when recombinant SR1 inhibited the neurotrophic activity of exogenous FGF2 and increased damaging effects of light by inhibiting endogenous FGF. This study highlights the significance of the generation of SR1 in normal and pathological conditions.     

Role of the neural retina in newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) lens regeneration in vitro

Removal of the lens from the eye of an adult newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) is followed by regeneration of a new lens from the dorsal iris epithelial cells at the pupillary margin. This process is dependent upon the neural retina for its normal completion in vivo and in vitro. To examine the relationship between the retina and lens regeneration, we have conducted experiments that delimit the time period during which the retinal presence is critical (in vivo) and have investigated the influence of extracts of the retina on the progress of regeneration (in vitro). In vivo, removal of the retina at day 11 seriously retards further progression of regeneration while removal of the retina at day 15 does not retard regeneration significantly. This defines a "critical period" in regeneration of the lens during which the retina is required. Explantation of regenerates 11 or 12 days after lentectomy to organ culture medium enriched with either crude retinal homogenate or extracts prepared from chick or bovine retinas according to Courty et al. ('85, Biochimie, 67:265-269) reveals that the progress of regeneration can be supported in culture by the crude extract. This is the first demonstration of complete iris-lens transformation in culture in the presence of retinal extract. It is possible that the retina acts indirectly by promoting passage of the iris epithelial cells through the critical number of mitoses required before redifferentiation into lens cells can occur (as proposed by Yamada, '77, Monogr. Dev. Biol., 13:126). It is also possible that the retina acts by directly instructing the iris cells to redifferentiate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

FGF10 is required for cell proliferation and gland formation in the stomach epithelium of the chicken embryo

The development of digestive organs in vertebrates involves active epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. In the chicken proventriculus (glandular stomach), the morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation of the epithelium are controlled by the inductive signaling factors that are secreted from the underlying mesenchyme. Previous studies have shown that Fgf10 is expressed in the developing chicken proventricular mesenchyme, whereas its receptors are present in the epithelium. In our present study, we show that FGF10 is an early mesenchymal signal that is critically associated with the developmental processes in the proventricular epithelium. Furthermore, virus-mediated Fgf10 overexpression in ovo results in a hypermorphic epithelial structure and an increase in epithelial cell number. In contrast, the overexpression of a secreted FGFR2b (sFGFR2b), an FGF10 antagonist, blocks cell proliferation and gland formation in the proventricular epithelium in ovo. This downregulation of proliferative activity was subsequently found to retard gland formation and also to delay differentiation of the epithelium. These results demonstrate that FGF10 signaling, mediated by FGFR1b and/or FGFR2b, is required for proliferation and gland formation in the epithelium in the developing chick embryo.