Identification of integrin beta subunit mutations that alter affinity for extracellular matrix ligand

We examined over 50 mutations in the Drosophila βPS integrin subunit that alter integrin function in situ for their ability to bind a soluble monovalent ligand, TWOW-1. Surprisingly, very few of the mutations, which were selected for conditional lethality in the fly, reduce the ligand binding ability of the integrin. The most prevalent class of mutations activates the integrin heterodimer. These findings emphasize the importance of integrin affinity regulation and point out how molecular interactions throughout the integrin molecule are important in keeping the integrin in a low affinity state. Mutations strongly support the controversial deadbolt hypothesis, where the CD loop in the β tail domain acts to restrain the I domain in the inactive, bent conformation. Site-directed mutations in the cytoplasmic domains of βPS and αPS2C reveal different effects on ligand binding from those observed for αIIbβ3 integrins and identify for the first time a cytoplasmic cysteine residue, conserved in three human integrins, as being important in affinity regulation. In the fly, we find that genetic interactions of the βPS mutations with reduction in talin function are consistent with the integrin affinity differences measured in cells. Additionally, these genetic interactions report on increased and decreased integrin functions that do not result in affinity changes in the PS2C integrin measured in cultured cells.     

Integrin ��IIb��3 Activation in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells and Platelets Increases Clustering Rather than Affinity

Integrin αIIbβ3 affinity regulation by talin binding to the cytoplasmic tail of β3 is a generally accepted model for explaining activation of this integrin in Chinese hamster ovary cells and human platelets. Most of the evidence for this model comes from the use of multivalent ligands. This raises the possibility that the activation being measured is that of increased clustering of the integrin rather than affinity. Using a newly developed assay that probes integrins on the surface of cells with only monovalent ligands prior to fixation, I do not find increases in affinity of αIIbβ3 integrins by talin head fragments in Chinese hamster ovary cells, nor do I observe affinity increases in human platelets stimulated with thrombin. Binding to a multivalent ligand does increase in both of these cases. This assay does report affinity increases induced by either Mn²⁺, a cytoplasmic domain mutant (D723R) in the cytoplasmic domain of β3, or preincubation with a peptide ligand. These results reconcile the previously observed differences between talin effects on integrin activation in Drosophila and vertebrate systems and suggest new models for talin regulation of integrin activity in human platelets.     

Specific integrin alpha and beta chain phosphorylations regulate LFA-1 activation through affinity-dependent and -independent mechanisms

Integrins are adhesion receptors that are crucial to the functions of multicellular organisms. Integrin-mediated adhesion is a complex process that involves both affinity regulation and cytoskeletal coupling, but the molecular mechanisms behind this process have remained incompletely understood. In this study, we report that the phosphorylation of each cytoplasmic domain of the leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 integrin mediates different modes of integrin activation. alpha Chain phosphorylation on Ser1140 is needed for conformational changes in the integrin after chemokine- or integrin ligand-induced activation or after activation induced by active Rap1 (Rap1V12). In contrast, the beta chain Thr758 phosphorylation mediates selective binding to 14-3-3 proteins in response to inside-out activation through the T cell receptor, resulting in cytoskeletal rearrangements. Thus, site-specific phosphorylation of the integrin cytoplasmic domains is important for the dynamic regulation of these complex receptors in cells.     

The Talin head domain binds to integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic tails and regulates integrin activation.

The beta subunit cytoplasmic domains of integrin adhesion receptors are necessary for the connection of these receptors to the actin cytoskeleton. The cytoplasmic protein, talin, binds to beta integrin cytoplasmic tails and actin filaments, hence forming an integrin-cytoskeletal linkage. We used recombinant structural mimics of beta(1)A, beta(1)D and beta(3) integrin cytoplasmic tails to characterize integrin-binding sites within talin. Here we report that an integrin-binding site is localized within the N-terminal talin head domain. The binding of the talin head domain to integrin beta tails is specific in that it is abrogated by a single point mutation that disrupts integrin localization to talin-rich focal adhesions. Integrin-cytoskeletal interactions regulate integrin affinity for ligands (activation). Overexpression of a fragment of talin containing the head domain led to activation of integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3); activation was dependent on the presence of both the talin head domain and the integrin beta(3) cytoplasmic tail. The head domain of talin thus binds to integrins to form a link to the actin cytoskeleton and can thus regulate integrin function.     

Transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in integrin activation and protein-protein interactions (review)

Integrins are heterodimeric membrane-spanning adhesion receptors that are essential for a wide range of biological functions. Control of integrin conformational states is required for bidirectional signalling across the membrane. Key components of this control mechanism are the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the alpha and beta subunits. These domains are believed to interact, holding the integrin in the inactive state, while inside-out integrin activation is accompanied by domain separation. Although there are strong indications for domain interactions, the majority of evidence is insufficient to precisely define the interaction interface. The current best model of the complex, derived from computational calculations with experimental restraints, suggests that integrin activation by the cytoplasmic protein talin is accomplished by steric disruption of the alpha/beta interface. Better atomic-level resolution structures of the alpha/beta transmembrane/cytoplasmic domain complex are still required for the resting state integrin to corroborate this. Integrin activation is also controlled by competitive interactions involving the cytoplasmic domains, particularly the beta-tails. The concept of the beta integrin tail as a focal adhesion interaction 'hub' for interactions and regulation is discussed. Current efforts to define the structure and affinity of the various complexes formed by integrin tails, and how these interactions are controlled, e.g. by phosphorylation and localization, are described.     

Transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in integrin activation and protein-protein interactions (Review)

Integrins are heterodimeric membrane-spanning adhesion receptors that are essential for a wide range of biological functions. Control of integrin conformational states is required for bidirectional signalling across the membrane. Key components of this control mechanism are the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the α and β subunits. These domains are believed to interact, holding the integrin in the inactive state, while inside-out integrin activation is accompanied by domain separation. Although there are strong indications for domain interactions, the majority of evidence is insufficient to precisely define the interaction interface. The current best model of the complex, derived from computational calculations with experimental restraints, suggests that integrin activation by the cytoplasmic protein talin is accomplished by steric disruption of the α/β interface. Better atomic-level resolution structures of the α/β transmembrane/cytoplasmic domain complex are still required for the resting state integrin to corroborate this. Integrin activation is also controlled by competitive interactions involving the cytoplasmic domains, particularly the β-tails. The concept of the β integrin tail as a focal adhesion interaction ‘hub’ for interactions and regulation is discussed. Current efforts to define the structure and affinity of the various complexes formed by integrin tails, and how these interactions are controlled, e.g. by phosphorylation and localization, are described.     

The phosphotyrosine binding-like domain of talin activates integrins

Cellular regulation of the ligand binding affinity of integrin adhesion receptors (integrin activation) depends on the integrin beta cytoplasmic domains (tails). The head domain of talin binds to several integrin beta tails and activates integrins. This head domain contains a predicted FERM domain composed of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). An integrin-activating talin fragment was predicted to contain the F2 and F3 subdomains. Both isolated subdomains bound specifically to the integrin beta3 tail. However, talin F3 bound the beta3 tail with a 4-fold higher affinity than talin F2. Furthermore, expression of talin F3 (but not F2) in cells led to activation of integrin alpha(IIb)beta3. A molecular model of talin F3 indicated that it resembles a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain. PTB domains recognize peptide ligands containing beta turns, often formed by NPXY motifs. NPX(Y/F) motifs are highly conserved in integrin beta tails, and mutations that disrupt this motif interfere with both integrin activation and talin binding. Thus, integrin binding to talin resembles the interactions of PTB domains with peptide ligands. These resemblances suggest that the activation of integrins requires the presence of a beta turn at NPX(Y/F) motifs conserved in integrin beta cytoplasmic domains.     

Transmembrane domain helix packing stabilizes integrin alphaIIbbeta3 in the low affinity state

Regulated changes in the affinity of integrin adhesion receptors ("activation") play an important role in numerous biological functions including hemostasis, the immune response, and cell migration. Physiological integrin activation is the result of conformational changes in the extracellular domain initiated by the binding of cytoplasmic proteins to integrin cytoplasmic domains. The conformational changes in the extracellular domain are likely caused by disruption of intersubunit interactions between the alpha and beta transmembrane (TM) and cytoplasmic domains. Here, we reasoned that mutation of residues contributing to alpha/beta interactions that stabilize the low affinity state should lead to integrin activation. Thus, we subjected the entire intracellular domain of the beta3 integrin subunit to unbiased random mutagenesis and selected it for activated mutants. 25 unique activating mutations were identified in the TM and membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain. In contrast, no activating mutations were identified in the more distal cytoplasmic tail, suggesting that this region is dispensable for the maintenance of the inactive state. Among the 13 novel TM domain mutations that lead to integrin activation were several informative point mutations that, in combination with computational modeling, suggested the existence of a specific TM helix-helix packing interface that maintains the low affinity state. The interactions predicted by the model were used to identify additional activating mutations in both the alpha and beta TM domains. Therefore, we propose that helical packing of the alpha and beta TM domains forms a clasp that regulates integrin activation.     

Calcium and Calmodulin-dependent Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase Type II (CaMKII)-mediated Intramolecular Opening of Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain-associated Protein-1 (ICAP-1α) Negatively Regulates β1 Integrins

Focal adhesion turnover during cell migration is an integrated cyclic process requiring tight regulation of integrin function. Interaction of integrin with its ligand depends on its activation state, which is regulated by the direct recruitment of proteins onto the β integrin chain cytoplasmic domain. We previously reported that ICAP-1α, a specific cytoplasmic partner of β1A integrins, limits both talin and kindlin interaction with β1 integrin, thereby restraining focal adhesion assembly. Here we provide evidence that the calcium and calmodulin-dependent serine/threonine protein kinase type II (CaMKII) is an important regulator of ICAP-1α for controlling focal adhesion dynamics. CaMKII directly phosphorylates ICAP-1α and disrupts an intramolecular interaction between the N- and the C-terminal domains of ICAP-1α, unmasking the PTB domain, thereby permitting ICAP-1α binding onto the β1 integrin tail. ICAP-1α direct interaction with the β1 integrin tail and the modulation of β1 integrin affinity state are required for down-regulating focal adhesion assembly. Our results point to a molecular mechanism for the phosphorylation-dependent control of ICAP-1α function by CaMKII, allowing the dynamic control of β1 integrin activation and cell adhesion.     

Identification of a Proline-Rich Sequence in the CD2 Cytoplasmic Domain Critical for Regulation of Integrin-Mediated Adhesion and Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase

The CD2 molecule is one of several lymphocyte receptors that rapidly initiates signaling events regulating integrin-mediated cell adhesion. CD2 stimulation of resting human T cells results within minutes in an increase in β1-integrin-mediated adhesion to fibronectin. We have utilized the HL60 cell line to map critical residues within the CD2 cytoplasmic domain involved in CD2 regulation of integrin function. A panel of CD2 cytoplasmic domain mutants was constructed and analyzed for their ability to upregulate integrin-mediated adhesion to fibronectin. Mutations in the CD2 cytoplasmic domain implicated in CD2-mediated interleukin-2 production or CD2 avidity do not affect CD2 regulation of integrin activity. A proline-rich sequence, K-G-P-P-L-P (amino acids 299 to 305), is essential for CD2-mediated regulation of β1 integrin activity. CD2-induced increases in β1 integrin activity could be blocked by two phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-K) inhibitors or by overexpression of a dominant negative form of the p85 subunit of PI 3-K. In addition, CD2 cytoplasmic domain mutations that abrogate CD2-induced increases in integrin-mediated adhesion also ablate CD2-induced increases in PI 3-K enzymatic activity. Surprisingly, CD2 cytoplasmic domain mutations that inhibit CD2 regulation of adhesion do not affect the constitutive association of the p85 subunit of PI 3-K association with CD2. Mutation of the proline residues in the K-G-P-P-L-P motif to alanines prevented CD2-mediated activation of integrin function and PI 3-K activity but not mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activity. Furthermore, the MEK inhibitor PD 098059 blocked CD2-mediated activation of MAP kinase but had no effect on CD2-induced adhesion. These studies identify a proline-rich sequence in CD2 critical for PI 3-K-dependent regulation of β1 integrin adhesion by CD2. In addition, these studies suggest that CD2-mediated activation of MAP kinase is not involved in CD2 regulation of integrin adhesion.     

Modulation of Integrin Activity is Vital for Morphogenesis

Cells can vary their adhesive properties by modulating the affinity of integrin receptors. The activation and inactivation of integrins by inside-out mechanisms acting on the cytoplasmic domains of the integrin subunits has been demonstrated in platelets, lymphocytes, and keratinocytes. We show that in the embryo, normal morphogenesis requires the α subunit cytoplasmic domain to control integrin adhesion at the right times and places. PS2 integrin (α_PS2β_PS) adhesion is normally restricted to the muscle termini, where it is required for attaching the muscles to the ends of other muscles and to specialized epidermal cells. Replacing the wild-type α_PS2 with mutant forms containing cytoplasmic domain deletions results in the rescue of the majority of defects associated with the absence of the α_PS2 subunit, however, the mutant PS2 integrins are excessively active. Muscles containing these mutant integrins make extra muscle attachments at aberrant positions on the muscle surface, disrupting the muscle pattern and causing embryonic lethality. A gain- of-function phenotype is not observed in the visceral mesoderm, showing that regulation of integrin activity is tissue-specific. These results suggest that the α_PS2 subunit cytoplasmic domain is required for inside-out regulation of integrin affinity, as has been seen with the integrin α_IIbβ₃.     

Structural basis of integrin activation by talin

Regulation of integrin affinity (activation) is essential for metazoan development and for many pathological processes. Binding of the talin phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain to integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic domains (tails) causes activation, whereas numerous other PTB-domain-containing proteins bind integrins without activating them. Here we define the structure of a complex between talin and the membrane-proximal integrin beta3 cytoplasmic domain and identify specific contacts between talin and the integrin tail required for activation. We used structure-based mutagenesis to engineer talin and beta3 variants that interact with comparable affinity to the wild-type proteins but inhibit integrin activation by competing with endogenous talin. These results reveal the structural basis of talin's unique ability to activate integrins, identify an interaction that could aid in the design of therapeutics to block integrin activation, and enable engineering of cells with defects in the activation of multiple classes of integrins.     

ICln, a novel integrin alphaIIbbeta3-associated protein, functionally regulates platelet activation

A critical role for the conserved alpha-integrin cytoplasmic motif, KVGFFKR, is recognized in the regulation of activation of the platelet integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3). To understand the molecular mechanisms of this regulation, we sought to determine the nature of the protein interactions with this cytoplasmic motif. We used a tagged synthetic peptide, biotin-KVGFFKR, to probe a high density protein expression array (37,200 recombinant human proteins) for high affinity interactions. A number of potential integrin-binding proteins were identified. One such protein, a chloride channel regulatory protein, ICln, was characterized further because its affinity for the integrin peptide was highest as was its expression in platelets. We verified the presence of ICln in human platelets by PCR, Western blots, immunohistochemistry, and its co-association with alpha(IIb)beta(3) by surface plasmon resonance. The affinity of this interaction was 82.2 +/- 24.4 nm in a cell free assay. ICln co-immunoprecipitates with alpha(IIb)beta(3) in platelet lysates demonstrating that this interaction is physiologically relevant. Furthermore, immobilized KVGFFKR peptides, but not control KAAAAAR peptides, specifically extract ICln from platelet lysates. Acyclovir (100 microm to 5 mm), a pharmacological inhibitor of the ICln chloride channel, specifically inhibits integrin activation (PAC-1 expression) and platelet aggregation without affecting CD62 P expression confirming a specific role for ICln in integrin activation. In parallel, a cell-permeable peptide corresponding to the potential integrin-recognition domain on ICln (AKFEEE, 10-100 microm) also inhibits platelet function. Thus, we have identified, verified, and characterized a novel functional interaction between the platelet integrin and ICln, in the platelet membrane.     

Effects of the association between the α-subunit thigh and the β-Subunit EGF2 domains on integrin activation and signaling

Integrin bidirectional signaling is mediated by conformational change. It has been shown that the separation of the α- and β-subunit transmembrane/cytoplasmic tails and the lower legs is required for transmitting integrin bidirectional signals across the plasma membrane. In this study, we address whether the separation of the αβ knee is critical for integrin activation and outside-in signaling. By introducing three disulfide bonds to restrict dissociation of the α-subunit thigh domain and β-subunit I-EGF2 domain, we found that two of them could completely abolish integrin inside-out activation, whereas the other could not. This disulfide-bonded mutant, in the context of the activation mutation of the cytoplasmic domain, had intermediate affinity for ligands and was able to mediate cell adhesion. Our data suggest that there exists rearrangement at the interface between the thigh domain and the I-EGF2 domain during integrin inside-out activation. None of the disulfide-bonded mutants could mediate cell spreading upon adhering to immobilized ligands, suggesting that dissociation of the integrin two knees is required for integrin outside-in signaling. Disrupting the interface by introducing a glycan chain into either subunit is sufficient for high affinity ligand binding and cell spreading.     

Tests of the extension and deadbolt models of integrin activation

Despite extensive evidence that integrin conformational changes between bent and extended conformations regulate affinity for ligands, an alternative hypothesis has been proposed in which a "deadbolt" can regulate affinity for ligand in the absence of extension. Here, we tested both the deadbolt and the extension models. According to the deadbolt model, a hairpin loop in the beta3 tail domain could act as a deadbolt to restrain the displacement of the beta3 I domain beta6-alpha7 loop and maintain integrin in the low affinity state. We found that mutating or deleting the beta3 tail domain loop has no effect on ligand binding by either alphaIIbbeta 3 or alphaVbeta3 integrins. In contrast, we found that mutations that lock integrins in the bent conformation with disulfide bonds resist inside-out activation induced by cytoplasmic domain mutation. Furthermore, we demonstrated that extension is required for accessibility to fibronectin but not smaller fragments. The data demonstrate that integrin extension is required for ligand binding during integrin inside-out signaling and that the deadbolt does not regulate integrin activation.     

A NPxY-independent beta5 integrin activation signal regulates phagocytosis of apoptotic cells

Integrin receptors are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors with critical functions in cell adhesion and migration, cell cycle progression, differentiation, apoptosis, and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Integrins are activated by intracellular signaling that alter the binding affinity for extracellular ligands, so-called inside to outside signaling. A common element for integrin activation involves binding of the cytoskeletal protein talin, via its FERM domain, to a highly conserved NPxY motif in the β chain cytoplasmic tails, which is involved in long-range conformation changes to the extracellular domain that impinges on ligand affinity. When the human beta-5 (β5) integrin cDNA was expressed in αv positive, β5 and β3 negative hamster CS-1 cells, it promoted NPxY-dependent adhesion to VTN-coated surfaces, phosphorylation of FAK, and concomitantly, β5 integrin-EGFP protein was recruited into talin and paxillin-containing focal adhesions. Expression of a NPxY destabilizing β5 mutant (Y750A) abrogated adhesion and β5-Y750A-EGFP was excluded from focal adhesions at the tips of stress fibers. Surprisingly, expression of β5 Y750A integrin had a potent gain-of-function effect on apoptotic cell phagocytosis, and further, a β5-Y750A-EGFP fusion integrin readily bound MFG-E8-coated 10 μm diameter microspheres developed as apoptotic cell mimetics. The critical sequences in β5 integrin were mapped to a YEMAS motif just proximal to the NPxY motif. Our studies suggest that the phagocytic function of β5 integrin is regulated by an unconventional NPxY-talin-independent activation signal and argue for the existence of molecular switches in the β5 cytoplasmic tail for adhesion and phagocytosis.     

Domain-specific interactions of talin with the membrane-proximal region of the integrin beta3 subunit

Activation (affinity regulation) of integrin adhesion receptors controls cell migration and extracellular matrix assembly. Talin connects integrins with actin filaments and influences integrin affinity by binding to the integrins' short cytoplasmic beta-tail. The principal beta-tail binding site in talin is a FERM domain, comprised of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). Previous studies of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 have shown that both F2 and F3 bind the beta3 tail, but only F3, or the F2-F3 domain pair, induces activation. Here, talin-induced perturbations of beta3 NMR resonances were examined to explore integrin activation mechanisms. F3 and F2-F3, but not F2, distinctly perturbed the membrane-proximal region of the beta3 tail. All domains also perturbed more distal regions of the beta3 tail that appear to form the major interaction surface, since the beta3(Y747A) mutation suppressed those effects. These results suggest that perturbation of the beta3 tail membrane-proximal region is associated with talin-mediated integrin activation.     

The N-terminal domains of talin cooperate with the phosphotyrosine binding-like domain to activate beta1 and beta3 integrins

The activation of integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity in response to intracellular cues controls cell adhesion and signaling. Binding of the cytoskeletal protein talin to the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail is required for beta3 activation, and the integrin-binding PTB-like F3 domain of talin is sufficient to activate beta3 integrins. Here we report that, whereas the conserved talin-integrin interaction is also required for beta1 activation, and talin F3 binds beta1 and beta3 integrins with comparable affinity, expression of the talin F3 domain is not sufficient to activate beta1 integrins. beta1 integrin activation could, however, be detected following expression of larger talin fragments that included the N-terminal and F1 domains, and mutagenesis indicates that these domains cooperate with talin F3 to mediate beta1 activation. This effect is not due to increased affinity for the integrin beta tail and we hypothesize that the N-terminal domains function by targeting or orienting talin in such a way as to optimize the interaction with the integrin tail. Analysis of beta3 integrin activation indicates that inclusion of the N-terminal and F1 domains also enhances F3-mediated beta3 activation. Our results therefore reveal a role for the N-terminal and F1 domains of talin during integrin activation and highlight differences in talin-mediated activation of beta1 and beta3 integrins.     

The N-terminal SH2 domains of Syk and ZAP-70 mediate phosphotyrosine-independent binding to integrin beta cytoplasmic domains

Syk and ZAP-70 form a subfamily of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that contain tandem SH2 domains at their N termini. Engagement of these SH2 domains by tyrosine-phosphorylated immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs leads to kinase activation and downstream signaling. These kinases are also regulated by beta3 integrin-dependent cell adhesion via a phosphorylation-independent interaction with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Here, we report that the interaction of integrins with Syk and ZAP-70 depends on the N-terminal SH2 domain and the interdomain A region of the kinase. The N-terminal SH2 domain alone is sufficient for weak binding, and this interaction is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin tail. Indeed, phosphorylation of tyrosines within the two conserved NXXY motifs in the integrin beta3 cytoplasmic domain blocks Syk binding. The tandem SH2 domains of these kinases bind to multiple integrin beta cytoplasmic domains with varying affinities (beta3 (Kd = 24 nm) > beta2 (Kd = 38 nm) > beta1 (Kd = 71 nm)) as judged by both affinity chromatography and surface plasmon resonance. Thus, the binding of Syk and ZAP-70 to integrin beta cytoplasmic domains represents a novel phosphotyrosine-independent interaction mediated by their N-terminal SH2 domains.     

A conserved lipid-binding loop in the kindlin FERM F1 domain is required for kindlin-mediated αIIbβ3 integrin coactivation

The activation of heterodimeric integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity states occurs in response to intracellular signals that act on the short cytoplasmic tails of integrin β subunits. Binding of the talin FERM (four-point-one, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain to the integrin β tail provides one key activation signal, but recent data indicate that the kindlin family of FERM domain proteins also play a central role. Kindlins directly bind integrin β subunit cytoplasmic domains at a site distinct from the talin-binding site, and target to focal adhesions in adherent cells. However, the mechanisms by which kindlins impact integrin activation remain largely unknown. A notable feature of kindlins is their similarity to the integrin-binding and activating talin FERM domain. Drawing on this similarity, here we report the identification of an unstructured insert in the kindlin F1 FERM domain, and provide evidence that a highly conserved polylysine motif in this loop supports binding to negatively charged phospholipid head groups. We further show that the F1 loop and its membrane-binding motif are required for kindlin-1 targeting to focal adhesions, and for the cooperation between kindlin-1 and -2 and the talin head in αIIbβ3 integrin activation, but not for kindlin binding to integrin β tails. These studies highlight the structural and functional similarities between kindlins and the talin head and indicate that as for talin, FERM domain interactions with acidic membrane phospholipids as well β-integrin tails contribute to the ability of kindlins to activate integrins.