Centromere identity in Drosophila is not determined in vivo by replication timing

Centromeric chromatin is uniquely marked by the centromere-specific histone CENP-A. For assembly of CENP-A into nucleosomes to occur without competition from H3 deposition, it was proposed that centromeres are among the first or last sequences to be replicated. In this study, centromere replication in Drosophila was studied in cell lines and in larval tissues that contain minichromosomes that have structurally defined centromeres. Two different nucleotide incorporation methods were used to evaluate replication timing of chromatin containing CID, a Drosophila homologue of CENP-A. Centromeres in Drosophila cell lines were replicated throughout S phase but primarily in mid S phase. However, endogenous centromeres and X-derived minichromosome centromeres in vivo were replicated asynchronously in mid to late S phase. Minichromosomes with structurally intact centromeres were replicated in late S phase, and those in which centric and surrounding heterochromatin were partially or fully deleted were replicated earlier in mid S phase. We provide the first in vivo evidence that centromeric chromatin is replicated at different times in S phase. These studies indicate that incorporation of CID/CENP-A into newly duplicated centromeres is independent of replication timing and argue against determination of centromere identity by temporal sequestration of centromeric chromatin replication relative to bulk genomic chromatin.     

Centromere formation: from epigenetics to self-assembly

This review is part of the Chromosome segregation and Aneuploidy series that focuses on the importance of chromosome segregation mechanisms in maintaining genome stability. Centromeres are specialized chromosomal domains that serve as the foundation for the mitotic kinetochore, the interaction site between the chromosome and the mitotic spindle. The chromatin of centromeres is distinguished from other chromosomal loci by the unique incorporation of the centromeric histone H3 variant, centromere protein A. Here, we review the genetic and epigenetic factors that control the formation and maintenance of centromeric chromatin and propose a chromatin self-assembly model for organizing the higher-order structure of the centromere.     

Chromosome Y Centromere Array Deletion Leads to Impaired Centromere Function

The centromere is an essential chromosomal structure that is required for the faithful distribution of replicated chromosomes to daughter cells. Defects in the centromere can compromise the stability of chromosomes resulting in segregation errors. We have characterised the centromeric structure of the spontaneous mutant mouse strain, BALB/cWt, which exhibits a high rate of Y chromosome instability. The Y centromere DNA array shows a de novo interstitial deletion and a reduction in the level of the foundation centromere protein, CENP-A, when compared to the non-deleted centromere array in the progenitor strain. These results suggest there is a lower threshold limit of centromere size that ensures full kinetochore function during cell division.     

Challenges to be faced in the reconstruction of metabolic networks from public databases

In the post-genomic era, the biochemical information for individual compounds, enzymes, reactions to be found within named organisms has become readily available. The well-known KEGG and BioCyc databases provide a comprehensive catalogue for this information and have thereby substantially aided the scientific community. Using these databases, the complement of enzymes present in a given organism can be determined and, in principle, used to reconstruct the metabolic network. However, such reconstructed networks contain numerous properties contradicting biological expectation. The metabolic networks for a number of organisms are reconstructed from KEGG and BioCyc databases, and features of these networks are related to properties of their originating database.     

How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity.

16S rRNA (genes coding for rRNA) sequence comparisons were conducted with the following three psychrophilic strains: Bacillus globisporus W25T (T = type strain) and Bacillus psychrophilus W16AT, and W5. These strains exhibited more than 99.5% sequence identity and within experimental uncertainty could be regarded as identical. Their close taxonomic relationship was further documented by phenotypic similarities. In contrast, previously published DNA-DNA hybridization results have convincingly established that these strains do not belong to the same species if current standards are used. These results emphasize the important point that effective identity of 16S rRNA sequences is not necessarily a sufficient criterion to guarantee species identity. Thus, although 16S rRNA sequences can be used routinely to distinguish and establish relationships between genera and well-resolved species, very recently diverged species may not be recognizable.     

Centromere identity maintained by nucleosomes assembled with histone H3 containing the CENP-A targeting domain

Active centromeres are marked by nucleosomes assembled with CENP-A, a centromere-specific histone H3 variant. The CENP-A centromere targeting domain (CATD), comprised of loop 1 and the alpha2 helix within the histone fold, is sufficient to target histone H3 to centromeres and to generate the same conformational rigidity to the initial subnucleosomal heterotetramer with histone H4 as does CENP-A. We now show in human cells and in yeast that depletion of CENP-A is lethal, but recruitment of normal levels of kinetochore proteins, centromere-generated mitotic checkpoint signaling, chromosome segregation, and viability can be rescued by histone H3 carrying the CATD. These data offer direct support for centromere identity maintained by a unique nucleosome that serves to distinguish the centromere from the rest of the chromosome.     

Centromere clustering: where synapsis begins

Centromeres congregate into a large cluster called the chromocenter during Drosophila oogenesis. Two recent studies now define a function and a genetic basis for this remarkable structure.     

Genotype to phenotype: a technological challenge

Our ability to ascribe protein function from primary DNA sequence or to predict the wide‐ranging effects of up or down regulating a single gene is still almost non‐existent. While the acquisition of raw genomic data proceeds apace, our capacity for converting this information into useful knowledge is limited. Within the next few years this “gap” will no doubt become an issue with both company and government fund providers as the drive to maximise profit and justify public expenditure becomes harder to resist. What follows is a whistle stop tour of some of the technologies that may help researchers to bridge this genotype‐phenotype gap!     

Centromere proteins and chromosome inheritance: a complex affair.

Centromeres and the associated kinetochores are involved in essential aspects of chromosome transmission. Recent advances have included the identification and understanding of proteins that have a pivotal role in centromere structure, kinetochore formation, and the coordination of chromosome inheritance with the cell cycle in several organisms. A picture is beginning to emerge of the centromere-kinetechore as a complex and dynamic structure with conservation of function at the protein level across diverse species.     

Centromere cohesion： regulating the guardian

Mitosis, a process in which duplicated chromosomes are segregated into two daughter cells, is the most spectacular event in cell cycle. In mitosis, cells undergo drastic rearrangement of cytoskeleton, lipid and chromosomes under amazingly strict temporal and spatial control so that genetic information is faithfully transmitted to daughter cells.[第一段]