Morphology of adenocarcinoma in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A cytologic and ultrastructural study

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and normal endocervical columnar epithelium were studied by cytology, morphometry and electron microscopy to identify differentiating features and to ascertain the cellular origin of cervical adenocarcinoma. Smears from AIS showed the characteristic cytology, consisting of glandular rosettes, palisading and crowded sheets; most nuclei had a relatively uniform oval shape. Smears from microinvasive adenocarcinoma showed more crowded sheets, with enlarged, round and irregular-shaped nuclei and prominent oval nucleoli. These nuclear features were confirmed by the morphometric results. Ultrastructurally, reserve cells in the normal tissues contained tonofibers and secretory granules and showed squamous and adenomatous features. The ultrastructural features of microinvasive adenocarcinoma were similar to those of well-differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma. The cells from both contained tonofibers and secretory granules. These findings suggested that the reserve cell is the cell of origin for cervical adenocarcinoma.     

Laminin-5 is a biomarker of invasiveness in cervical adenocarcinoma

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Glandular lesions are often problematic for diagnostic cervical pathology. The survival of patients with adenocarcinoma is significantly poorer than that of patient with squamous cell carcinoma. One reason for this increased risk is the aggressive invasiveness of adenocarcinoma. Therefore additional biomarkers, to supplement morphological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, are necessary. We have assessed the diagnostic utility of Laminin-5 (Laminin gamma2 chain): Lam-5 in the diagnosis of the invasiveness of cervical adenocarcinoma and related glandular lesions. METHODS: Lam-5 immunohistochemistry was performed on archival specimens from 8 patients with uterine leiomyoma as a negative control group, 6 patients with endocervical gland hyperplasia, 6 patients with adenocarcinoma in situ, 6 patients with microinvasive adenocarcinoma and 24 patients with invasive adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: The expression of Lam-5 was not detected in normal mucosa, but was seen along the basement membrane in endocervical gland hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ and was observed in the cytoplasm of tumor cells in microinvasive and invasive adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Lam-5 is a useful biomarker in the evaluation of invasiveness in cervical adenocarcinoma.Virtual slidesThe virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/7316562925827381.     

Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells by the 2001 Bethesda System in cytohistologic correlation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate incidence, cytology findings and pathology outcome of atypical glandular cells (AGC) in Pap smears according to the 2001 Bethesda criteria. STUDY DESIGN: From 103,073 consecutive Pap smears, 113 (0.1%) AGC cases were identified. Of these, 91 (80%) had adequate histologic evaluation included in this study. RESULTS: Abnormal histology findings were seen in 38 patients (42%). Final pathology results revealed 14 endometrial adenocarcinomas, 5 endocervical adenocarcinomas, 1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma, 1 endometrial stromal sarcoma, 6 other malignancies, 4 endocervical adenocarcinomas in situ, 4 cases ofendometrial complex byperplasia, 1 case of endocervical glandular dysplasia and 2 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 with glandular involvement. Women with AGC, favor neoplasia, were more likely to have significant pathology than those with AGC, not otherwise specified, 74% vs. 33% (p = 0.002). Some characteristic background cytologic findings were also noticed in most cases of endometrial, fallopian tube and endocervical adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of AGC is more clinically significant by the 2001 Bethesda System, especially the "AGC, favor neoplastic" category. Some background cytologic features are important because they are indicators of malignancy.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology

A. Talaat, D. Brinkmann, J. Dhundee, Y. Hana, J. Bevan, R. Irvine, S. Bailey and R. Woolas
Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology Objective: To review the risk of pre‐invasive and invasive gynaecological pathology in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. Methods: Review of the case notes of all women referred with cervical cytology reported as ?glandular neoplasia between January 1999 and December 2008 at two UK hospitals: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and Queen Mary’s Hospital Sidcup. The category of ‘borderline nuclear change in endocervical cells’, result code 8 according to the national health service cancer screening programme (NHSCSP), was excluded from the study. Results: A total of 200 women were identified using the hospitals’ pathology computer systems. Invasive carcinoma was found in 48 women (24%): 28 endocervical adenocarcinomas, eight squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), ten endometrial and two ovarian adenocarcinomas. Pre‐invasive neoplasia was found in 115 (57.5%), including 14 cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), 31 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 and 70 concomitant CGIN and CIN2/3. CIN1/HPV was found in 25, simple endometrial hyperplasia in three and no histological abnormality in three. Thirty‐four (70.8%) of 48 invasive carcinomas (of which 23 were endocervical adenocarcinomas) were in asymptomatic women investigated for abnormal cytology. Fourteen of 34 (41.4%) of those with ?glandular neoplasia thought to be endometrial were CGIN or CIN2/3. Colposcopic appearances were normal in 47.6% of women with pure cervical glandular neoplasia (adenocarcinoma or CGIN) compared with 12.8% with squamous cell lesions (CIN2/3 or SCC): P = 0.0001. Thus, colposcopy was more sensitive for detecting squamous cell abnormalities than their glandular counterparts. Although cervical adenocarcinomas are less amenable to prevention by screening than cervical SCC, in our study cervical cytology predominantly detected these abnormalities at their early asymptomatic stages. Conclusion: At least CIN2 was found in 81.5% in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. A thorough evaluation of the whole genital tract is needed if colposcopy is negative.     

Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens

Objective: To identify in cytology, high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with endocervical glandular extension in cases previously diagnosed as atypical glandular cells (AGC), analyse possible reasons for the diagnostic pitfall and document the frequency of glandular pathology coexisting with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial lesion in histology. Methods: Thirty‐nine ThinPrep® cervical smear (Pap) tests reported as AGC of undetermined significance and showing high‐grade lesions on histology [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, endometrial or extrauterine adenocarcinoma] were reviewed retrospectively to identify the cases of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical glandular extension, using the Bethesda 2001 system. Cyto‐histological correlation was performed. Results: A high frequency of diverse glandular pathologies coexisted with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial lesions on histology. This included endocervical glandular extension in 63%, benign glandular pathology in 33% and pre‐neoplastic or malignant glandular pathology (endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ and metastatic breast carcinoma) in 17% cases. On cytology, the sensitivity was 40%, specificity was 80% and positive predictive value was 86% for endocervical gland extension in high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Conclusions: Special efforts to recognize endocervical glandular extension in high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and glandular neoplasia coexisting with squamous intraepithelial lesions from the heterogeneous category of AGC can contribute to increasing the diagnostic accuracy. The identification of endocervical glandular extension on cervical cytology would alert the gynaecologist to perform a thorough assessment of the endocervix during colposcopy. This could also help to decide on the need to perform deeper conization rather than loop electrosurgical excision procedure to ensure negative margins when colposcopic biopsy shows CIN 2 or 3.     

The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. II. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma

Criteria for the cytologic diagnosis of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix have not been previously established. Such cytologic criteria were evolved through the detailed analysis of cervical smears from 40 histologically confirmed cases. The cellular features of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) were always associated with microinvasion. Syncytia of glandular cells, small cells in very crowded sheets and papillary groupings of cells, when seen in conjunction with AIS, were suggestive of microinvasion. Dissociation of cells was common. Nuclear pleomorphism with an irregular chromatin pattern and inconspicuous-to-prominent nucleoli was frequently present. In some cases, a tumor diathesis was seen in the smear background. Using these criteria, our predictive accuracy for diagnosing microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma is improving steadily and now approaches 50%. Ongoing investigation of these cases must include a diagnostic come biopsy to further improve the predictive accuracy for this lesion.     

Decrease in numbers of glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ liquid-based cytology preparations

Objective:  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) has become standard of care in the management of cervical squamous neoplasia and with cone biopsy glandular intraepithelial neoplasia. Controversy remains about the long-term effects of this traumatic procedure. The aim of this study was to count and compare the number of endocervical glandular cell groups in pre- and post-LLETZ cervical preparations using liquid-based cytology to establish a cyto-morphological correlate of destruction of the transformation zone.
Methods:  The cytology/histology correlation audit records of the Cytopathology Department of St Luke's Hospital in 2003 and early 2004 were used to select patients with a cytological diagnosis of high grade dyskaryosis followed by LLETZ. Only those cases with post-LLETZ cytological follow-up were selected. Cases using conventional smears were excluded. One hundred and twenty slides (60 pairs of slides) in total were retrieved. The cases underwent review and all groups of >3 glandular cells in each slide were counted by AM while blinded as to whether smears were pre- or post-LLETZ. Medians were compared using a Mann–Whitney U -test.
Results:  The median number of groups of endocervical glandular cells of the pre-treatment group was 5.5 and of the post-treatment group was 2.0. There were significantly fewer endocervical glandular cell groups in the post-LLETZ population ( P  = 0.03).
Conclusions:  The number of endocervical glandular groups in cervical cytological preparations decreases significantly following LLETZ procedure. This suggests that cytological follow-up may not be as useful in glandular neoplasia cases. Few or absent glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ preparations may have implications for adequacy assessment.     

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of endocervical adenocarcinoma has increased steadily over the past two decades. Since the Bethesda System was introduced, the diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) has also risen and now accounts for 0.46-1.83% of all cervical (Pap) smears. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of a diagnosis of AGUS using cytohistologic correlation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of archival material from 1993 through 1996 identified 64 patients who had smears diagnosed as AGUS and had a subsequent surgical biopsy. The smears were reviewed and cytologic features analyzed and correlated with the histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: On biopsy, 3 (5%) of the 64 cases showed endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (1 case with invasive adenocarcinoma also), 14 (22%) had a benign glandular lesion (endocervical polyp, tubal metaplasia, microglandular hyperplasia, reactive changes), 35 (54%) had squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) (15 diagnosed on the original smear), and 12 (19%) had no abnormality. Among the cytologic criteria evaluated, feathering (P = .01), palisading (P < .001) and chromatin clearing (P = .002) were shown to have a significant association with the histopathologic diagnosis of AIS/adenocarcinoma. These features were also useful in distinguishing AIS/adenocarcinoma from SIL and benign glandular changes from AIS/adenocarcinoma but not benign/reactive glandular changes from SIL. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of AGUS correlated with a clinically significant lesion in the majority of cases. Squamous dysplasia (SIL) was the most common lesion identified. The presence of feathering, nuclear palisading and chromatin clearing increased the likelihood of a histologic diagnosis of AIS/adenocarcinoma.     

Cytological aspects of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and combined adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma: appraisal of diagnostic criteria for in situ versus invasive lesions

Cytological aspects of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma and combined adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma: appraisal of diagnostic criteria for in situ versus invasive lesions
This paper reports the cytological findings based on air-dried smears in a retrospective series of 143 cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma, combined adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma drawn from the files of the BC Cancer Registry. Cervical cytology smears were available before biopsy in 131 patients, but in 18 cases the cytology showed no abnormality. Malignant changes or high-grade atypia of glandular and/or squamous cells (defined as moderate or severe dyskaryosis) were detected in 103 cases. In 46 cases, only a high-grade squamous abnormality was detected. Low-grade glandular and/or squamous lesions were detected in nine cases and one showed atypical endometrial-type glands. The cervical smears of 64 cases were reviewed in detail to determine the important cytomorphological criteria of in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma in air-dried smears, the technique used for preparing PAP smears in British Columbia. Endocervical cells were absent in four cases. Numerous (>10) groups of glandular cells were present in 51 cases. Important clues to the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma included crowding of nuclei, stratification of nuclei, loss of polarity, syncytial balls and papillary groups of glandular cells, nuclear enlargement, nuclear pleomorphism, and the presence of free-lying atypical glandular cells. Nuclear hyperchromatism, chromatin pattern, nuclear borders, nuclear membranes, and numbers and morphology of nucleoli were not helpful criteria in our material. Criteria enabling reliable distinction between in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma and/or mixed adenocarcinoma-squamous carcinoma could not be established.     

Endocervical glandular neoplasia and its mimics in ThinPrep Pap tests. A descriptive study.

OBJECTIVE: To document the cytologic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma as observed in ThinPrep slides and to compare these features with those that have been described for conventional smears. STUDY DESIGN: Six cases of endocervical AIS and three cases of invasive adenocarcinoma were evaluated with respect to 3 low-power and 14 high-power features. All cases were biopsy proven. Glandular "look-alikes" (tubal metaplasia, n = 3; florid repair, n = 3; sampling of lower uterine segment, n = 1) were also examined. RESULTS: All cases of AIS contained dark groups and sheets at screening power. At higher power, nuclear detail was extremely well visualized. All cases had crowding, continuous depth of focus, variability of nuclear size and shape within groups, irregular nuclear membranes, uniformly stippled chromatin and at least occasional single atypical cells. Only one case lacked nucleoli. Traditional features (strips, feathering, rosettes and mitoses) were observed about as frequently as in conventional smears. Invasive lesions had many of the same features, with relatively more inflammation and lysed blood. Nonneoplastic look-alikes could be distinguished from neoplasms using traditional criteria. CONCLUSION: In this small study, AIS and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma maintained the features previously described for conventional smears. Improved visualization of nuclear detail may allow the application of additional criteria, such as irregular nuclear membranes and the more consistent presence of nucleoli, for distinguishing glandular neoplasms from their look-alikes.     

Endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. I. Morphometric and cytologic characterization of cases that "cannot rule out adenocarcinoma in situ"

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether evaluating morphologic features through morphometry and cytology can lead to a more-satisfactory characterization of endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) cases that "cannot rule out adenocarcinoma in situ" (AIS). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-seven endocervical AGUS cases showing incomplete criteria of AIS were morphometrically compared to five smears with normal endocervical columnar cells (ECC) and to five histologically confirmed endocervical adenocarcinoma cases. For each atypical nucleus, the area and shape were measured. Twenty-five cytologic criteria were used to review the AGUS and neoplastic smears. RESULTS: AGUS nuclei showed an intermediate value in terms of area and shape as compared to the values of normal and neoplastic nuclei. In particular, AGUS nuclear enlargement (136.626 micron 2) was about twice the area of normal nuclei and half the value of the area of neoplastic nuclei (P < .0000). AGUS nuclei also had the greatest variability in size and shape, indicating that anisonucleosis may be a morphologic discriminator of endocervical AGUS. The cytologic features useful in discriminating AGUS from neoplastic smears were: presence of normal ECCs, singly or in sheets (P < .001); absence of necrosis (P < .001); bare atypical cells (P < .001); papillary groups (P < .01); anisonucleosis (P < .05); irregular chromatin distribution (P < .05); and hyperchromasia (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Morphometry and cytology led to a better characterization of endocervical AGUS cases that "cannot rule out AIS."     

Guest Lecture 8.45–9.30 Monday 15 September 2003 Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and its Precursors

The incidence of malignant and pre‐malignant endocervical glandular lesions is increasing. Part of this is an apparent increase due to a reduction in the number of invasive cervical squamous carcinomas but there is evidence that there is a real increase in malignant and pre‐malignant endocervical glandular lesions. Different terminologies are in use in the UK where the term cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) is commonly used and the rest of the world where pre‐malignant lesions are classified as glandular dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (WHO classification). It is well established that high‐grade CGIN (AIS in WHO terminology) is a precursor lesion of cervical adenocarcinoma but it is controversial whether a recognizable precursor to high grade CGIN (namely low‐grade CGIN) exists and criteria for diagnosing this are poorly established and poorly reproducible. Most cases of CGIN are of usual or endocervical type but other morphological subtypes described include endometrioid, intestinal, tubal and stratified mucinous intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). The presence of skip lesions and lesions high up the endocervical canal has been overemphasised in CGIN with most cases occurring close to the transformation zone. Treatment is on an individualized basis but local excision with negative margins and close cytological follow‐up may be employed. There is evidence in the literature that early invasive adenocarcinomas behave in a similar fashion to early invasive squamous carcinomas and that, on selected occasions, conservative therapy can be safely undertaken. However, further studies are needed to ascertain the behaviour and natural history of early invasive cervical adenocarcinoma. In 10%–15% of cases it may be impossible to ascertain whether a malignant endocervical glandular lesion is invasive or in situ. There are many benign mimics of CGIN and adenocarcinoma, including tuboendometrial metaplasia (TEM), endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia (MGH). Although careful morphological examination usually allows confident distinction of these lesions, a panel of immunohistochemical stains including MIB1, bcl2 and p16 may assist.     

Outcomes of cervical liquid-based cytology suggesting a glandular abnormality

Objective: To ascertain the positive predictive value of both ?glandular neoplasia (national standard code 6) and borderline change (national standard code 8) in glandular cells in liquid‐based cervical cytology specimens in Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust and to outline the histological outcomes of these cases. Method: Eighty‐nine liquid‐based (Surepath?) cervical cytology cases were retrospectively identified from a 2‐year period (January 2005 to December 2006) and correlated with histopathological diagnoses. Results: Initial punch biopsy histology revealed 18 cases (21%) of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN). A further nine cases (10%) of CGIN were identified following local excision or hysterectomy. Ten cases of invasive malignancy were identified: four endocervical adenocarcinomas (all node negative, TNM stage T1b1), five endometrial adenocarcinomas and one squamous cell carcinoma. There were 10 with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) alone. Women diagnosed with endometrial malignancy presented later with an average age of 64.6 years compared with 34.9 years for endocervical lesions. Taking high‐grade CIN or worse as a positive outcome, the overall positive predictive value (PPV) of glandular abnormalities on cytology (both code 6 and 8) was 58.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8, 68.4]. PPV for borderline change in glandular cells alone was 24.1% (95% CI 8.5, 39.6) and for ?glandular neoplasia alone 75.4% (95% CI 64.3, 86.5). Conclusion: With our interpretation of the classification, women with cytological diagnoses of glandular neoplasia of the cervix should initially be investigated by local resection rather than punch biopsy, and those with borderline change in glandular cells with repeat cytology.     

An audit of liquid‐based cervical cytology screening samples (ThinPrep and SurePath) reported as glandular neoplasia

S. A. Thiryayi, J. Marshall and D. N. Rana
An audit of liquid‐based cervical cytology screening samples (ThinPrep and SurePath) reported as glandular neoplasia Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the number of cases diagnosed as glandular neoplasia (national report code 6) of cervical (6A) and non‐cervical (6B) types on ThinPrep (TP) and SurePath (SP) liquid‐based cytology (LBC) samples and to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of these diagnoses for significant glandular and/or squamous pathology for local audit and as a contribution to national data on glandular neoplasia. Methods: A computerized search identified all screening LBC samples reported as glandular neoplasia during the 24‐month period from January 2006 to December 2007. Corresponding histology samples were identified, with a minimum follow‐up period of 6 months for each case. Results: A total of 70 samples, representing 70 patients, were reported as glandular neoplasia, 39 TP (55.7%) and 31 SP (44.3%), with 46 samples (31 TP, 15 SP) reported as 6A and 24 samples (eight TP, 16 SP) as 6B. PPV of glandular neoplasia was calculated for a biopsy diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia/adenocarcinoma and/or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse. The PPV of 6A was 100% for both TP and SP. The PPV of 6B for adenocarcinoma was 62.5% for TP and 66.7% for SP. The combined PPV for 6A + 6B was 92.3% for TP, 83.3% for SP and 88.4% combined. The overall pick‐up rates for the two methods were significantly different (TP 0.031%, SP 0.052%; P = 0.014). Histology showed only CIN3 with endocervical crypt involvement in nine TP cases and one SP case.     

Outcomes of pregnant patients with Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells

J. Slama, P. Freitag, P. Dundr, J. Duskova, D. Fischerova, M. Zikan, I. Pinkavova and D. Cibula
Outcomes of pregnant patients with Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells Objectives: The incidence of cervical cancers increases with age. Due to the trend of increasing age of first pregnancy, abnormal Pap smears including those classified as atypical glandular cells (AGC) are being found more often in early pregnancy. Once invasive cancer is excluded, conservative management of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) in pregnancy is considered safe; however, optimal management of AGC is not well established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AGC diagnosed from smears during pregnancy. Methods: The study included 17 patients referred to us in early pregnancy with Pap smears reported as AGC: 11 not otherwise specified (AGC‐NOS), five favour neoplasia (AGC‐FN) and one adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Thirty‐one with high‐grade SIL (HSIL) Pap smears confirmed on punch biopsy in early pregnancy comprised a control group. Human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity was found in seven patients with persistent AGC‐NOS (including all four who had CIN3 postpartum). All the women were initially examined by expert colposcopy and those with AGC‐FN or AIS smears also by transrectal ultrasound to exclude invasive endocervical cancer. Follow‐up controls were carried out every 8–12 weeks and, if there were no signs of progression, revaluation was scheduled 6–8 weeks after delivery. Results: The mean age of the women was 31.4 years. Conization in one patient in the study group was performed in the 16th week of pregnancy due to colposcopic signs of microinvasive squamous cell cancer confirmed on histology. Progression to invasive cancer was not found in any of the other 16 patients in the study group or in the control group. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or AIS was confirmed postpartum by conization or punch biopsy in 47.1% (8/17) of patients in the study group and, in 77.4% (24/31) of patients in the control group. Conclusions: Conservative management of women with AGC in pregnancy is safe where invasive cancer is excluded. As histological verification of glandular pre‐cancerous lesions by punch biopsy is not reliable and the postpartum regression rate cannot be determined precisely, conization should be performed in all cases with AGC‐FN or AIS. Triage of persistent AGC‐NOS with HPV testing is useful in distinguishing significant underlying lesions.     

Comparative cytologic features of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix

The cytologic findings in 30 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and related lesions of the cervix were compared with those in 13 cases of cervical invasive adenocarcinoma and 8 cases of cervical nonneoplastic conditions that mimicked AIS cytologically. Although there was considerable overlap, the presence of large cells with irregular nuclei and uneven chromatin distribution in smears containing no normal endocervical cells helped to distinguish invasive adenocarcinoma from AIS. The presence of "feathering," rosettes, mitotic figures and very crowded nuclei with scant cytoplasm and without cilia helped distinguish AIS from benign conditions.     

The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. III. Pitfalls in diagnosis

Potential pitfalls in the cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix are illustrated by the presentation of three cases of benign cervical lesions initially diagnosed as AIS: cervical endometriosis, tubal metaplasia of the endocervix and changes due to a previous biopsy. The differential diagnosis of endocervical glandular abnormalities is discussed.     

A retrospective clinical audit of cervical smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia'.

The aims of this study were to review the diagnostic pathway of women with smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia' and to outline the management, colposcopy findings, treatment and final histological diagnosis in these women. The design was a retrospective review. A total of 114 women were identified over a 5-year period from the cytology database at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Cytology Department, whose hospital case notes were available for review. Methods included a review of the case notes for the demographic details, indication for smear, colposcopic findings, investigation and/or treatment procedures, histology, final diagnosis and current disease status. Of 114 smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia', 67 were reported as consistent with cervical glandular intra-epithelial neoplasia (CGIN), six with endocervical adenocarcinoma, 36 with endometrial adenocarcinoma and five with other glandular neoplastic abnormalities. The average age was 46.5 years. 79 (69.3%) smears were routine call/recall and 36 (30.7%) women were symptomatic. The positive predictive value (PPV) for a significant histological abnormality in the CGIN smear group was 80.6% (23.9% invasive carcinomas, 43.3% CGIN and 13.4% CIN) and the PPV of an 'endometrial adenocarcinoma' smear was 86.1%. Smears indicating glandular neoplasia are associated with a high probability of clinically significant lesions, the PPV of a CGIN smear being over 80%. Immediate referral for colposcopy and assessment by an experienced colposcopist is recommended.     

How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?

The prevalence of endocervical adenocarcinoma and its precursors has increased, in part due to increased diagnostic awareness of these lesions. To date, limited information has been published regarding the predictive value of glandular abnormalities in cervical smears. This study details the histological follow up of 418 cervical smears showing glandular abnormality, reported in our department over a six year period from 1993 to 1998. Histological follow up was available for 395 of the 418 smears (94.50%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) for this group of smears was 72.66% for either significant glandular or squamous pathology (at least low grade cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia or CIN2 on follow up biopsy), and 55.70% for significant glandular pathology alone. Examination of subcategories of abnormal glandular smear showed that the PPV increased with the degree of abnormality reported within the smears.