Modulation of tumorigenesis and oestrogen receptor‐α expression by cell culture conditions in a stem cell‐derived breast epithelial cell line

Background information. The common phenotypes of cancer and stem cells suggest that cancers arise from stem cells. Oestrogen is one of the few most important determinants of breast cancer, as shown by several lines of convincing evidence. We have previously reported a human breast epithelial cell type (Type 1 HBEC) with stem cell characteristics and ERα (oestrogen receptor α) expression. A tumorigenic cell line, M13SV1R2, was developed from this cell type after SV40 (simian virus 40) large T‐antigen transfection and X‐ray irradiation. The cell line, however, was not responsive to oestrogen for cell growth or tumour development. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that deprivation of growth factors and hormones may change the tumorigenicity and oestrogen response of this cell line. Results. The M13SV1R2 cells lost their tumorigenicity after culturing in a growth factor/hormone‐deprived medium for >10 passages (referred to as R2d cells) concomitant with the expression of two tumour suppressor genes, namely those coding for maspin and α6 integrin. However, these cells acquired oestrogen responsiveness in cell growth and tumour development. By immunocytochemistry, Western blotting and flow cytometry analysis, oestrogen treatment of R2d cells was found to induce many important effects related to breast carcinogenesis, namely: (i) the emergence of a subpopulation of cells expressing CD44^+/high/CD24^?/low breast tumour stem cell markers; (ii) the induction of EMT (epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition); (iii) the acquisition of metastatic ability; and (iv) the expression of COX‐2 (cyclo‐oxygenase‐2) through a CD44‐mediated mechanism. Conclusion. An oestrogen‐responsive cell line with ERα and CD44⁺/CD24^?/low expression can be derived from breast epithelial stem cells. The tumorigenicity and oestrogen response of these cells could depend on the cell culture conditions. The findings of this study have implications in regard to the origins of (1) ERα‐positive breast cancers, (2) CD44⁺/CD24^?/low breast tumour stem cells and (3) the metastatic ability of breast cancer.     

Estrogen receptor alpha is essential for the proliferation of prostatic smooth muscle cells stimulated by 17β-estradiol and insulin-like growth factor 1

Estradiol (E₂) and its receptor estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) are implicated in the pathology of stromal‐predominant benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Insulin‐like growth factor 1(IGF1) is produced primarily by stromal cells in the prostate. Recent study showed that E₂‐mediated regulation of IGF1 in mouse uterus requires the DNA binding ability of ERα. However, the crosstalk between ERα and IGF1 in the prostate has not been addressed yet. Therefore, in this study we employed mouse prostatic smooth muscle cells (PSMCs) as a model to demonstrate that E₂ stimulated the proliferation of PSMCs and up‐regulated the expression of IGF1 and its receptor IGF1R as well as cyclin D1 in PSMCs, all of which could be inhibited by shRNA‐mediated knockdown of ERα. Furthermore, we found that exogenous IGF1 could not promote cell proliferation and cyclin D1 expression in PSMCs subjected to shRNA‐mediated knockdown of ERα. Interestingly, blockage of IGF1R by antibody could inhibit E₂‐stimulated PSMCs proliferation. Altogether our present study provides the first line of evidence that there is crosstalk between ERα and IGF1 signaling in PSMCs proliferation in which ERα up‐regulates the expression of IGF1 and IGF1R, and IGF1 signaling is indispensable to mediate downstream effects of E₂ and ERα. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

ERK1/2 and Akt pathway activated during (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1)-induced apoptosis in MCF-7 cells

(3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) was isolated from the endogenous fungus, Fusarium oxysporum J8-1-2. Previous studies showed that (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) has anti-oestrogen properties which make it cytotoxic to ER (oestrogen receptor)-positive breast cancer cells (MCF-7) by cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis. (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) suppresses mRNA and protein expression of the ERα and oestrogen responsive genes of cyclin D1 and PR. We have investigated the interaction between (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) and ERα and followed the roles of ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase), Akt and GSK3β (glycogen synthase kinase 3β) during (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1)-induced apoptosis of MCF-7 cells. (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) competed with E2 (17β-estradiol) for ERα active sites to inhibit ERα activation. However, while ERK1/2 and Akt were activated, GSK3β was inactivated during (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1)-induced apoptosis, suggesting that this compound is indeed an anti-oestrogen agent that can also activate the survival signalling pathway. Apoptosis caused by (3R,6R)-bassiatin(1) may be related to activation of ERK.     

A novel antioestrogen agent (3R,6R)-bassiatin inhibits cell proliferation and cell cycle progression by repressing cyclin D1 expression in 17β-oestradiol-treated MCF-7 cells

Bassiatin [(3R,6R)-bassiatin] was isolated from the endogenous fungus Fusarium oxysporum J8-1-2. We found that oestrogen-dependent cell growth was inhibited by bassiatin in MCF-7 ERα (oestrogen receptor α)-positive breast cancer cells. In addition, the mRNA and protein levels of ERα and the oestrogen-responsive gene cyclin D1 were down-regulated by bassiatin in the presence of 17β-oestradiol. Co-treatment of 17β-oestradiol and bassiatin increased phospho-cyclin D1 (Thr286), an indicator of cyclin D1 phosphorylation-dependent degradation. However, this effect was not obvious in the absence of 17β-oestradiol, suggesting that bassiatin may play a role in the metabolism of cyclin D1 by decreasing cyclin D1 protein expression in the presence of 17β-oestradiol. Cyclin D1, known as a key cell cycle regulator, regulates the transition of G1- and S-phase. Decreased cyclin D1 was found to be involved in bassiatin-induced MCF-7 cell cycle arrest. Collectively, our study showed that bassiatin induced cell cycle arrest and exerted an antioestrogen effect. It may prove to be a potential drug target for antioestrogen therapy in ERα-positive breast cancer.     

Docosahexaenoic acid induces proteasome-dependent degradation of estrogen receptor α and inhibits the downstream signaling target in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

About two thirds of breast cancers in women are hormone-dependent and require estrogen for growth, its effects being mainly mediated through estrogen receptor α (ERα). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) and arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4n-6) have opposite effects on carcinogenesis, with DHA suppressing and AA promoting tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism is not clear. Here, we examined whether the effect is mediated through changes in ERα distribution. MCF-7 cells, an ERα-positive human breast cancer cell line, was cultured in estrogen-free medium containing 0, 10 or 60 μM DHA or AA, then were stimulated with estradiol. DHA supplementation resulted in down-regulation of ERα expression (particularly in the extranuclear fraction), a reduction in phosphorylated MAPK, a decrease in cyclin D1 levels and an inhibition in cell viability. In contrast, AA had no such effects. The DHA-induced decrease in ERα expression resulted from proteasome-dependent degradation and not from decreased ERα mRNA expression. We propose that breast cancer cell proliferation is inhibited by DHA through proteasome-dependent degradation of ERα, reduced cyclin D1 expression and inhibition of MAPK signaling.     

Cryptotanshinone inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is dependent on oestrogen receptor alpha in breast cancer

Cryptotanshinone (CPT) has been demonstrated to inhibit proliferation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in MCF‐7 breast cancer cells. However, the same results are unable to be repeated in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Given the main difference of oestrogen receptor α (ERα) between two types of breast cancer cells, It is possibly suggested that CPT inhibits mTOR pathway dependent on ERα in breast cancer. CPT could significantly inhibit cell proliferation of ERα‐positive cancer cells, whereas ERα‐negative cancer cells are insensitive to CPT. The molecular docking results indicated that CPT has a high affinity with ERα, and the oestrogen receptor element luciferase reporter verified CPT distinct anti‐oestrogen effect. Furthermore, CPT inhibits mTOR signalling in MCF‐7 cells, but not in MDA‐MB‐231 cells, which is independent on binding to the FKBP12 and disrupting the mTOR complex. Meanwhile, increased expression of phosphorylation AKT and insulin receptor substrate (IRS1) induced by insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1) was antagonized by CPT, but other molecules of IGF‐1/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase (PI3K) were negatively affected. Finally, the MCF‐7 cells transfected with shERα for silencing ERα show resistant to CPT, and p‐AKT, phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase 1 (p‐S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E‐BP1) were partially recovered, suggesting ERα is required for CPT inhibition of mTOR signalling. Overall, CPT inhibition of mTOR is dependent on ERα in breast cancer and should be a potential anti‐oestrogen agent and a natural adjuvant for application in endocrine resistance therapy.     

Reciprocal roles of DBC1 and SIRT1 in regulating estrogen receptor α activity and co-activator synergy

Estrogen receptor α (ERα) plays critical roles in development and progression of breast cancer. Because ERα activity is strictly dependent upon the interaction with coregulators, coregulators are also believed to contribute to breast tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Regulator 1 (CCAR1) is an important co-activator for estrogen-induced gene expression and estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells. Here, we identified Deleted in Breast Cancer 1 (DBC1) as a CCAR1 binding protein. DBC1 was recently shown to function as a negative regulator of the NAD-dependent protein deacetylase SIRT1. DBC1 associates directly with ERα and cooperates synergistically with CCAR1 to enhance ERα function. DBC1 is required for estrogen-induced expression of a subset of ERα target genes as well as breast cancer cell proliferation and for estrogen-induced recruitment of ERα to the target promoters in a gene-specific manner. The mechanism of DBC1 action involves inhibition of SIRT1 interaction with ERα and of SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of ERα. SIRT1 also represses the co-activator synergy between DBC1 and CCAR1 by binding to DBC1 and disrupting its interaction with CCAR1. Our results indicate that DBC1 and SIRT1 play reciprocal roles as major regulators of ERα activity, by regulating DNA binding by ERα and by regulating co-activator synergy.     

TWIST represses estrogen receptor-alpha expression by recruiting the NuRD protein complex in breast cancer cells

Loss of estrogen receptor α (ERα) expression and gain of TWIST (TWIST1) expression in breast tumors correlate with increased disease recurrence and metastasis and poor disease-free survival. However, the molecular and functional regulatory relationship between TWIST and ERα are unclear. In this study, we found TWIST was associated with a chromatin region in intron 7 of the human ESR1 gene coding for ERα. This association of TWIST efficiently recruited the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex to this region, which subsequently decreased histone H3K9 acetylation, increased histone H3K9 methylation and repressed ESR1 expression in breast cancer cells. In agreement with these molecular events, TWIST expression was inversely correlated with ERα expression in both breast cancer cell lines and human breast ductal carcinomas. Forced expression of TWIST in TWIST-negative and ERα-positive breast cancer cells such as T47D and MCF-7 cells reduced ERα expression, while knockdown of TWIST in TWIST-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer cells such as MDA-MB-435 and 4T1 cells increased ERα expression. Furthermore, inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity including the one in NuRD complex significantly increased ERα expression in MDA-MB-435 and 4T1 cells. HDAC inhibition together with TWIST knockdown did not further increase ERα expression in 4T1 and MDA-MB-435 cells. These results demonstrate that TWIST/NuRD represses ERα expression in breast cancer cells. Therefore, TWIST may serve as a potential molecular target for converting ERα-negative breast cancers to ERα-positive breast cancers, allowing these cancers to restore their sensitivity to endocrine therapy with selective ERα antagonists such as tamoxifen and raloxifene.     

HIF-1α is necessary for activation and tumour-promotion effect of cancer-associated fibroblasts in lung cancer

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) activation is crucial for the establishment of a tumour promoting microenvironment, but our understanding of CAFs activation is still limited. In this study, we found that hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) was highly expressed in CAFs of human lung cancer tissues and mouse spontaneous lung tumour. Accordingly, enhancing the expression of HIF-1α in fibroblasts via hypoxia induced the conversion of normal fibroblasts into CAFs. HIF-1α-specific inhibitor or HIF-1α knockout (KO) significantly attenuated CAFs activation, which was manifested by the decreased expression of COL1A2 and α-SMA. In vivo, during tumour formation, the expression of Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the tumour tissue with HIF-1α KO fibroblasts was significantly lower than that of normal fibroblasts. Moreover, HIF-1α in fibroblasts could activate the NF-κB signalling pathway and enhance a subsequent secretion of CCL5, thus promoting the tumour growth. In conclusion, our results suggest that HIF-1α is essential for the activation and tumour-promotion function of CAFs in lung cancer (LC). And targeting HIF-1α expression on CAFs may be a promising strategy for LC therapy.     

Membrane progesterone receptor alpha as a potential prognostic biomarker for breast cancer survival: a retrospective study

Classically, the actions of progesterone (P4) are attributed to the binding of nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) and subsequent activation of its downstream target genes. These mechanisms, however, are not applicable to PR- or basal phenotype breast cancer (BPBC) due to lack of PR in these cancers. Recently, the function of membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRα) in human BPBC cell lines was studied in our lab. We proposed that the signaling cascades of P4→mPRα pathway may play an essential role in controlling cell proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) of breast cancer. Using human breast cancer tissue microarrays, we found in this study that the average intensity of mPRα expression, but not percentage of breast cancer with high level of mPRα expression (mPRα-HiEx), was significantly lower in the TNM stage 4 patients compared to those with TNM 1-3 patients; and both average intensities of mPRα expression and mPRα-HiEx rates were significantly higher in cancers negative for ER, as compared with those cancers with ER+. However, after adjusting for age at diagnosis and/or TNM stage, only average intensities of mPRα expression were associated with ER status. In addition, we found that the rates of mPRα-HiEx were significantly higher in cancers with epithelial growth factor receptor-1 (EGFR+) and high level of Ki67 expression, indicating positive correlation between mPRα over expression and EGFR or Ki67. Further analysis indicated that both mPRα-HiEx rate and average intensity of mPRα expression were significantly higher in HER2+ subtype cancers (i.e. HER2+ER-PR-) as compared to ER+ subtype cancers. These data support our hypothesis that P4 modulates the activities of the PI3K and cell proliferation pathways through the caveolar membrane bound growth factor receptors such as mPRα and growth factor receptors. Future large longitudinal studies with larger sample size and survival outcomes are necessary to confirm our findings.     

IL-1 induces p62/SQSTM1 and autophagy in ERα+/PR+ BCa cell lines concomitant with ERα and PR repression,conferring an ERα−/PR− BCa-like phenotype

Estrogen receptor α (ERα)^low/− tumors are associated with breast cancer (BCa) endocrine resistance, where ERα low tumors show a poor prognosis and a molecular profile similar to triple negative BCa tumors. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) downregulates ERα accumulation in BCa cell lines, yet the cells can remain viable. In kind, IL-1 and ERα show inverse accumulation in BCa patient tumors and IL-1 is implicated in BCa progression. IL-1 represses the androgen receptor hormone receptor in prostate cancer cells concomitant with the upregulation of the prosurvival, autophagy-related protein, Sequestome-1 (p62/SQSTM1; hereinafter, p62); and given their similar etiology, we hypothesized that IL-1 also upregulates p62 in BCa cells concomitant with hormone receptor repression. To test our hypothesis, BCa cell lines were exposed to conditioned medium from IL-1-secreting bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), IL-1, or IL-1 receptor antagonist. Cells were analyzed for the accumulation of ERα, progesterone receptor (PR), p62, or the autophagosome membrane protein, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), and for p62-LC3 interaction. We found that IL-1 is sufficient to mediate BMSC-induced ERα and PR repression, p62 and autophagy upregulation, and p62-LC3 interaction in ERα⁺/PR⁺ BCa cell lines. However, IL-1 does not significantly elevate the high basal p62 accumulation or high basal autophagy in the ERα⁻/PR⁻ BCa cell lines. Thus, our observations imply that IL-1 confers a prosurvival ERα⁻/PR⁻ molecular phenotype in ERα⁺/PR⁺ BCa cells that may be dependent on p62 function and autophagy and may underlie endocrine resistance.