Strong morphological support for the molecular evolutionary tree of placental mammals

The emerging molecular evolutionary tree for placental mammals differs greatly from morphological trees, leading to repeated suggestions that morphology is uninformative at this level. This view is here refuted empirically, using an extensive morphological and molecular dataset totalling 17 431 characters. When analysed alone, morphology indeed is highly misleading, contradicting nearly every clade in the preferred tree (obtained from the molecular or the combined data). Widespread homoplasy overrides historical signal. However, when added to the molecular data, morphology surprisingly increases support for most clades in the preferred tree. The homoplasy in the morphology is incongruent with all aspects of the molecular signal, while the historical signal in the morphology is congruent with (and amplifies) the historical signal in the molecular data. Thus, morphology remains relevant in the genomic age, providing vital independent corroboration of the molecular tree of mammals.     

A review of iguanian and anguimorph lizard genitalia (Squamata: Chamaeleonidae; Varanoidea, Shinisauridae, Xenosauridae, Anguidae) and their phylogenetic significance: comparisons with molecular data sets

We compare phylogenetic hypotheses for iguanian (chameleonids) and anguimorph lizard groups (varanoids, xenosauroids, anguids) which were generated from analyses of genital (hemipenial) morphology, with recent molecular phylogenetic approaches towards the same groups. Taxa with infraspecific communication by means of visible, sexually dimorphic epigamic characters usually have less diverse genital structures than taxa with less developed visible epigamic characters but with a more highly developed chemical intersexual communication. Generally, it turned out in the cases considered here, that phylogenetic hypotheses based on hemipenial characters coincide much better with molecular-genetic phylogenies than with earlier concepts based solely on external morphology. It seems that genital morphological characters are phylogenetically more informative – on both the species and the supraspecific level – than external morphological characters at least in these examples, because the former seem not to be affected by environmental selective pressures but seem to be only subject to sexual selection. Our data suggest that sexual selective pressure on genital structural diversity is higher the less sexually dimorphic, optical cues for infraspecific communication have evolved. They further suggest a correlation with the mating system (single versus multiple matings).