The twisted 'life' of DNA in the cell: bacterial topoisomerases

DNA topoisomerases are essential to the cell for the regulation of DNA supercoiling levels and for chromosome decatenation. The proposed mechanisms for these reactions are essentially the same, except that a change in supercoiling is due to an intramolecular event, while decatenation requires an intermolecular event. The characterized bacterial topoisomerases appear capable of both types of reaction in vitro. Four DNA topoisomerases have been identified in Escherichia coli. Topoisomerase I, gyrase, and topoisomerase IV normally appear to have distinct essential functions within the cell, Gyrase and topoisomerase I are responsible for the regulation of DNA supercoiling. Both gyrase and topoisomerase IV are necessary for chromosomal decatenation. Multiple topoisomerases with distinct functions may give the cell more precise control over DNA topology by allowing tighter regulation of the principal enzymatic activities of these different proteins.     

Untangling intracellular DNA topology

The biochemical steps by which bacterial topoisomerases alter the topology of DNA are well known. However, it has been a more vexing task to establish physiological roles and sites of action of the different topoisomerases within the context of the bacterial cell cycle. This difficulty can be attributed in part to the redundancy among the activities of the different enzymes. In this microreview, we will focus on recent progress in understanding the topological structure of the chromosome, analysis of topoisomerase mechanism in single-molecule assays and recent data on the regulation and integration of topoisomerase activity within the cell cycle that have all brought a new perspective to the action of topoisomerases in the bacterial cell.     

Role of topoisomerases in cytotoxicity induced by DNA ligand Hoechst-33342 and UV-C in a glioma cell line

DNA ligand Hoechst-33342 significantly enhances UV induced cytotoxicity in human glioma cell lines (BMG-1 & U-87) with supra additive increase in cell death, cytogenetic damage, cell cycle delay, apoptosis and inhibition of PLDR. Cytotoxicity of Hoechst-33342 arises due to its interference in the breakage-rejoining reaction of DNA topoisomerases by stabilization of cleavable complexes. Since topoisomerases have also been implicated in the generation of potentially lethal DNA breaks by interaction with various types of DNA damage including UV induced DNA lesions, we investigated in present studies the role of functional topoisomerases in the synergistic cytotoxicity of Hoechst-33342 and UV in a human glioma cell line (BMG-1). Topoisomerase I activity analyzed by the plasmid relaxation assay, was significantly enhanced upon UV irradiation, implying a possible role of this enzyme in the processing of UV induced lesions. However, this increase in the activity was reduced by >50% in cells incubated with Hoechst-33342 for 1 hr prior to irradiation. Imunoflowcytometric analysis of the chromatin bound topoisomerases I and II levels (cleavable complex) using topoisomerases I and II anti-antibodies showed a good correlation between the induction of apoptosis by Hoechst-33342 and UV and enhancement in the level of topoisomerase II mediated cleavable complexes. Induction of apoptosis was associated with a decline in the level of Bcl2. Taken together, these studies show that supra additive cytotoxic effects of UV-C and Hoechst-33342 in BMG-1 cells are consequences of enhanced stabilization of topo II mediated cleavable complexes and alterations in specific signal transduction pathways of apoptosis, besides the inhibition of topoisomerase mediated repair processes.     

Gossypol Interferes with Both Type I and Type II Topoisomerase Activities Without Generating Strand Breaks

A considerable number of agents with chemotherapeutic potentials reported over the past years were shown to interfere with the reactions of DNA topoisomerases, the essential enzymes that regulate conformational changes in DNA topology. Gossypol, a naturally occurring bioactive phytochemical is a chemopreventive agent against various types of cancer cell growth with a reported activity on mammalian topoisomerase II. The compounds targeting topoisomerases vary in their mode of action; class I compounds act by stabilizing covalent topoisomerase-DNA complexes resulting in DNA strand breaks while class II compounds interfere with the catalytic function of topoisomerases without generating strand breaks. In this study, we report Gossypol as the interfering agent with type I topoisomerases as well. We also carried out an extensive set of assays to analyze the type of interference manifested by Gossypol on DNA topoisomerases. Our results strongly suggest that Gossypol is a potential class II inhibitor as it blocked DNA topoisomerase reactions with no consequently formed strand breaks.     

Functional interactions of DNA topoisomerases with a human replication origin

The human DNA replication origin, located in the lamin B2 gene, interacts with the DNA topoisomerases I and II in a cell cycle-modulated manner. The topoisomerases interact in vivo and in vitro with precise bonds ahead of the start sites of bidirectional replication, within the pre-replicative complex region; topoisomerase I is bound in M, early G1 and G1/S border and topoisomerase II in M and the middle of G1. The Orc2 protein competes for the same sites of the origin bound by either topoisomerase in different moments of the cell cycle; furthermore, it interacts on the DNA with topoisomerase II during the assembly of the pre-replicative complex and with DNA-bound topoisomerase I at the G1/S border. Inhibition of topoisomerase I activity abolishes origin firing. Thus, the two topoisomerases are closely associated with the replicative complexes, and DNA topology plays an essential functional role in origin activation.     

新生霉素抑制拓扑异构酶Ⅱ对多瘤病毒DNA合成的影响

本文报告了Ⅱ型拓扑异构酶抑制剂——新生霉素对多瘤病毒DNA合成的抑制作用,发现新生霉素对细胞和病毒DNA的体外合成具有不同的抑制曲线。新生霉素在复制过程中抑制复制中间物转变成成熟的病毒DNA分子的过程,同时影响病毒DNA分子的负超螺旋密度。本文结果提示Ⅱ型拓扑异构酶是病毒DNA复制末期所必须的酶。     

Dna topoisomerase activities in plants: Involvement in cell proliferation

Abstract

The role of DNA topoisomerases in cell processes related to DNA metabolism, their involvement in the regulation of cell proliferation and their distribution in plant tissues are discussed.     

Synergistic interactions between tumor necrosis factor and inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I and II

TNF is a pleiotropic cytokine that mediates diverse cellular responses, including cytotoxicity, cytostasis, proliferation, differentiation, and the expression of specific genes. Many of these processes require the activity of DNA topoisomerases I and II. We have investigated the interactions of TNF with inhibitors of both topoisomerases in 16-h assays using the murine L929 and human ME-180 cell lines, which undergo a cytotoxic TNF response. Camptothecin, a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I, enhanced TNF cytotoxicity 150-fold against both cell lines. The topoisomerase II inhibitors VM-26 and VP-16, which stabilize covalent DNA-topoisomerase intermediates, greatly enhance TNF cytotoxicity against both cell lines. The most effective, VM-26, can lower the TNF LD50 to femtomolar levels. In contrast, the topoisomerase II inhibitors novobiocin and coumermycin, which bind to the enzyme ATPase site, protect L929 cells from TNF cytotoxicity but enhance TNF cytotoxicity in ME-180 cells. The large changes in TNF sensitivity induced by drug concentrations that by themselves show no effect, and the opposing synergistic effects of inhibitors with different inhibitory mechanisms (in L929 cells), suggest the active involvement of topoisomerases in TNF-mediated cytotoxicity. The correlation of cytotoxic synergy with the stabilization of DNA strand breaks indicates that DNA damage may play a significant role in TNF-mediated cytotoxicity.     

Bacterial type II topoisomerases as targets for antibacterial drugs

Bacterial type II DNA topoisomerases are essential enzymes for correct genome functioning and cell growth. Gyrase is responsible for maintaining negative supercoiling of bacterial chromosome, whereas topoisomerase IV acts in disentangling daughter chromosomes following replication. Type II DNA topoisomerases possess an ATP binding site, which can be treated as a target for antibacterial drugs. Resolving crystal structures of protein fragments consisting of an ATP binding site complexed with ADPNP/antibiotics have proven to be valuable for the understanding of the mode of action of existing antibacterial agents and presented new possibilities for novel drug design. Coumarins, quinolones and cyclothialidines are diverse group of antibiotics that interfere with type II DNA topoisomerases, however their mode of action is different. Recently a new class of antibiotics, simociclinones, was characterized. Their mechanism of action towards gyrase is entirely distinct from already known modes of action, therefore demonstrating the potential for development of novel anti-bacterial agents.     

Topoisomerases in kinetoplastids

Topoisomerases are enzymes that mediate topological changes in DNA that are essential for nucleic acid biosynthesis and for cell survival. The kinetoplastid protozoa, which include pathogenic trypanosomes and Leishmania, have yielded an interesting variety of purified topoisomerase activities as well as several topoisomerase genes. In these parasites, topoisomerases are involved in the metabolism of both nuclear and mitochondrial (kinetoplast) DNA. In this review, Christian Burri, Armette Bodley and Theresa Shapiro summarize what is known about topoisomerases in kinetoplastids, and consider the intriguing possibility that these enzymes may act as valuable antiparasite drug targets.     

Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by inhibitors of topoisomerases

To investigate the role of topoisomerases in the production of sister chromatid exchanges, the effects of inhibitors of type I and II topoisomerases on baseline and mutagen-induced sister chromatid exchanges were compared. V79 cells were treated with VM-26 and m-AMSA, known inhibitors of type II topoisomerase, or with camptothecin, the only known inhibitor of type I topoisomerase. We observed that inhibitors of both type I and II topoisomerases induced high levels of sister chromatid exchanges at 10^–6 M, and that the dose-response curves of these drugs were very similar. A clear heterogeneity in the distribution patterns of exchanges induced by inhibitors of topoisomerases was observed. We believe that this heterogeneity in response to these compounds is due to variation in sensitivity within the cell cycle. We also studied interactions of these agents with mitomycin-C and with PUVA (8-methoxypsoralen + UVA), both cross-linking agents and potent sister chromatid exchange inducers, and with x-rays, an agent that induces high levels of DNA strand breaks. No significant change in exchange levels was observed in interactions between topoisomerase inhibition and the levels induced by the agents studied. We conclude that double-strand break prevalence, known to be increased through inhibition of type II topoisomerase, is not the primary mechanism for induction of sister chromatid exchanges. We further conclude that acute inhibition of type I and type II topoisomerases does not influence substantially the induction of exchanges by other agents.Abbreviations MMC mitomycin C - 8-MOP 8-methoxypsoralen - SCE sister chromatid exchange - SFM serum-free medium     

Multiple bacterial topoisomerases: Specialization or redundancy?

In the past few years, two new DNA topoisomerases have been discovered in bacteria, bringing the total number of DNA topoisomerases in E. coli to four. Two classes of topoisomerases, type 1 and type 2, are distinguishable by their amino acid homology and their apparent reaction mechanism. Of the four E. coli topoisomerases, there are two type 1 and two type 2 enzymes. In eukaryotes, the existence of multiple type 1 and type 2 enzymes has also become apparent. The existence of these multiple enzymes provokes a question whose answer has both evolutionary and physiological implications: are these topoisomerases functionally redundant, or have they acquired sufficient specialization that they now perform unique biological reactions? In bacteria, there is evidence for both specialization and redundancy in the functions of topoisomerases.     

Evodiamine, a dual catalytic inhibitor of type I and II topoisomerases, exhibits enhanced inhibition against camptothecin resistant cells

DNA topoisomerases are nuclear enzymes that are the targets for several anticancer drugs. In this study we investigated the antiproliferative activity against human leukaemia cell lines and the effects on topoisomerase I and II of evodiamine, which is a quinazolinocarboline alkaloid isolated from the fruit of a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Evodia rutaecarpa. We report here the anti-proliferative activity against human leukaemia cells K562, THP-1, CCRF-CEM and CCRF-CEM/C1 and the inhibitory mechanism on human topoisomerases I and II, important anti-cancer drugs targets, of evodiamine. Evodiamine failed to trap [Topo-DNA] complexes and induce any detectable DNA damage in cells, was unable to bind or intercalate DNA, and arrested cells in the G(2)/M phase. The results suggest evodiamine is a dual catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II, with IC(50) of 60.74 and 78.81 μM, respectively. The improved toxicity towards camptothecin resistant cells further supports its inhibitory mechanism which is different from camptothecin, and its therapeutic potential.     

Cell cycle effects of the DNA topoisomerase inhibitors camptothecin and m-AMSA in lymphoblastoid cell lines from patients with Fanconi anemia

Patients with the autosomal recessive disorder Fanconi anemia (FA) present with progressive pancytopenia, skeletal abnormalities and a predisposition to leukemia. In addition to elevated rates of spontaneous chromosome aberrations occurring in cultured fibroblasts and lymphoblastoid cell lines, an increased susceptibility to DNA cross-linking agents and oxygen has been found. To explain this hypersensitivity to clastogenic agents a defective function of DNA topoisomerase I or II could be invoked, a suggestion which is supported by the co-localization of the DNA topoisomerase I gene and a putative FA gene to chromosome 20q. In order to investigate the function of DNA topoisomerases in FA, the sensitivity of lymphoid B-cell lines derived from FA patients and control cell lines to inhibitors of DNA topoisomerases I and II was compared using continuous bromodeoxyuridine labeling and bivariate Hoechst/ethidium bromide flow cytometry. Both agents inhibited cell proliferation mainly by arresting cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. However, no difference was found in sensitivity towards both DNA topoisomerase inhibitors between control and FA cell lines.