The budding yeast kinetochore: less simple than expected

Summary We focus on the established kinetochore proteins of the budding yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The location and functional evidence for each kinetochore protein is summarized along with the data that supports protein-protein and genetic interactions. Models are proposed to illustrate how these kinetochore proteins assemble to evoke a kinetochore-centromere complex.     

Relevance of histone acetylation and replication timing for deposition of centromeric histone CENP-A

A centromere-specific variant of histone H3, centromere protein A (CENP-A), is a critical determinant of centromeric chromatin, and its location on the chromosome may determine centromere identity. To search for factors that direct CENP-A deposition at a specific chromosomal locus, we took advantage of the observation that CENP-A, when expressed at elevated levels, can get incorporated at ectopic sites on the chromosome, in addition to the centromere. As core histone hypoacetylation and DNA replication timing have been implicated as epigenetic factors that may be important for centromere identity, we hypothesized that the sites of preferential CENP-A deposition will be distinguished by these parameters. We found that, on human dicentric chromosomes, ectopically expressed CENP-A preferentially incorporates at the active centromere only, despite the fact that the levels of histone acetylation and replication timing were indistinguishable at the two centromeres. In CHO cells, ectopically expressed CENP-A is preferentially targeted to some, but not all telomeric regions. Again, these regions could not be distinguished from other telomeres by their acetylation levels or replication timing. Thus histone acetylation and replication timing are not sufficient for specifying the sites of CENP-A deposition and likely for centromere identity.     

Identification of noncoding transcripts from within CENP-A chromatin at fission yeast centromeres

The histone H3 variant CENP-A is the most favored candidate for an epigenetic mark that specifies the centromere. In fission yeast, adjacent heterochromatin can direct CENP-A(Cnp1) chromatin establishment, but the underlying features governing where CENP-A(Cnp1) chromatin assembles are unknown. We show that, in addition to centromeric regions, a low level of CENP-A(Cnp1) associates with gene promoters where histone H3 is depleted by the activity of the Hrp1(Chd1) chromatin-remodeling factor. Moreover, we demonstrate that noncoding RNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) from CENP-A(Cnp1) chromatin at centromeres. These analyses reveal a similarity between centromeres and a subset of RNAPII genes and suggest a role for remodeling at RNAPII promoters within centromeres that influences the replacement of histone H3 with CENP-A(Cnp1).     

Regulation of the subcellular shuttling of Sgo1 between centromeres and chromosome arms by Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation

A minor fraction of cohesin complexes at chromosome arms is not removed by the prophase pathway, and maintained until metaphase and enriched at centromeres. Sgo1 localizes to chromosome arms from prophase to metaphase, and is indispensable for removing cohesin complexes from chromosome arms. However, it has not been established how the chromosome arm localization of Sgo1 leads to the establishment of cohesion on chromosomes. Here, we report that Aurora B kinase interacts with and phosphorylates Sgo1 in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of Sgol by Aurora B kinase regulated the distribution of Sgo1 between centromeres and chromosome arms, and the expression of Aurora B kinase-dead mutants of Sgo1 caused mislocalization from centromeres to chromosome arms. These results suggest Aurora B kinase directly regulates the subcellular distribution of Sgo1 to facilitate the accurate separation of mitotic chromosomes     

TRIM36 interacts with the kinetochore protein CENP-H and delays cell cycle progression

The tripartite motif-containing protein (TRIM) family is defined by the presence of a common domain structure composed of a RING finger, a B-box, and a coiled-coil motif. TRIM family proteins are involved in a broad range of biological processes and, consistently, their alterations result in diverse pathological conditions such as genetic diseases, viral infection, and cancer development. In this study, we found by using yeast two-hybrid screening that TRIM36 has a ubiquitin ligase activity and interacts with centromere protein-H, one of the kinetochore proteins. We also found by immunofluorescence analysis that TRIM36 colocalizes with α-tubulin, one of the microtubule proteins. Moreover, we found that overexpression of TRIM36 decelerates the cell cycle and attenuates cell growth. These results indicate that TRIM36 is potentially associated with chromosome segregation and that an excess of TRIM36 may cause chromosomal instability.     

Evolutionary movement of centromeres in horse, donkey, and zebra

Centromere repositioning (CR) is a recently discovered biological phenomenon consisting of the emergence of a new centromere along a chromosome and the inactivation of the old one. After a CR, the primary constriction and the centromeric function are localized in a new position while the order of physical markers on the chromosome remains unchanged. These events profoundly affect chromosomal architecture. Since horses, asses, and zebras, whose evolutionary divergence is relatively recent, show remarkable morphological similarity and capacity to interbreed despite their chromosomes differing considerably, we investigated the role of CR in the karyotype evolution of the genus Equus. Using appropriate panels of BAC clones in FISH experiments, we compared the centromere position and marker order arrangement among orthologous chromosomes of Burchelli's zebra (Equus burchelli), donkey (Equus asinus), and horse (Equus caballus). Surprisingly, at least eight CRs took place during the evolution of this genus. Even more surprisingly, five cases of CR have occurred in the donkey after its divergence from zebra, that is, in a very short evolutionary time (approximately 1 million years).These findings suggest that in some species the CR phenomenon could have played an important role in karyotype shaping, with potential consequences on population dynamics and speciation.     

The CCAN complex: linking centromere specification to control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics

For over 70 years, chromosomes have been known to oscillate back-and-forth on the metaphase plate. These movements are directed by kinetochores, the microtubule-attachment complexes on centromeres that regulate the dynamics of bound spindle microtubules. Recent evidence shows that the CCAN (Constitutive Centromere Associated Network) kinetochore network, which directly binds centromeric nucleosomes, plays a crucial role in the control of kinetochore microtubule dynamics. Here we review how this 15-subunit protein network functions within the kinetochore machinery, how it may adapt dynamically both in time and in space to the functional requirements necessary for controlled and faithful chromosome movements during cell division, and how this conserved protein network may have evolved in organisms with different cell division machineries.     

Centromeres: old tales and new tools

The centromere is a specialised region of the eukaryotic chromosome that directs the equal segregation of sister chromatids into two daughter cells during mitosis. In mitosis, the kinetochores mediate (1) microtubule capture and chromosome alignment at a metaphase plate; (2) the correction of improper microtubule attachments; (3) the maintenance of an active checkpoint until bi-orientation is achieved by the whole complement of chromosomes; (4) the establishment of tension within the centromere which, in turn, contributes to silencing of the spindle checkpoint and triggers the onset of anaphase. In this review, we will analyse how centromeres are organised with respect to chromatin types and arrangements.     

Ndc80复合体在外层动粒中的作用

动粒是参与有丝分裂过程中染色体分离的蛋白的附着支架。结构保守的Ndc80复合体位于动粒的外层,连接动粒和微管,与动粒-微管连接的稳定性有关。Aurora B/Ipl1激酶参与纠正动粒-微管的错误连接。Ndc80复合体对纺锤体组装检查点的功能非常重要。本文主要介绍了Ndc80复合体的研究进展。     

Chromosome mapping in barley by means of telotrisomic analysis

Summary A total of 37 genetic markers located in chromosomes 2, 3, 4 and 5 were associated with specific arms by means of telotrisomic analysis in five telotrisomics (Triplo 2 L, 2 S, 3 S, 4 S, 5 L) of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). The genes v, gp (= gp 2), li, gs 5, tr and msg2 showed a trisomic ratio with Triplo 2 L indicating that these genes were on the long arm of chromosome 2. A disomic ratio was obtained for genes wst 4, gs 5, and v with Triplo 2 S, confirming that these genes were on the long arm of chromosome 2(2 L). A disomic ratio was observed for genes e, f(= lg), sk, and gs6 with Triplo 2 L. Two genes, f(= lg) and gs6 showed a trisomic ratio with Triplo 2S. These results indicated that genes e, f(= lg), sk, and gs 6 are on the short arm of chromosome 2 (2S). Since only one telocentric chromosome was available for chromosome 3, 4 and 5, most of the well-mapped marker genes were tested with those telocentric chromosomes. The genes cu 2, uz, wst, als, gs 2, zb,f2, and cer-zn ³⁴⁸ showed trisomic ratio with the telocentric for chromosome 3. These genes were located on the short arm of chromosome 3 (Robertson 1971). This indicated that the telocentric chromosome is for the short arm of chromosome 3(3 S). A disomic ratio was obtained for genes yst, x _c, al, yst2, a _n, ari-a ⁶ and x _s, indicating that these genes are on the long arm of chromosome 3. Two genes, f9 and K, showed trisomic ratio with the telocentric chromosome for 4, while genes gl(= gl2), br2, yh, lg 3, lg 4 and lk 5 showed disomic ratios. This indicated that the telocentric chromosome is for the short arm of chromosome 4. Two genes, fs 2 and g, were studied with Triplo 5 L. Both showed trisomic ratio, indicating that fs 2 and g are located on Triplo 5 L. The centromere position (C) on chromosome 2, 3 and 4 was thus located as (the left side of C is the short arm and the right is the long arm): chromosome 2: f — sk — gs6 — e — C — gs5 — msg2 — wst4 — v — gp — li — tr; chromosome 3: f2 — cer-zn ³⁴⁸ — uz — gs2 — als — cu2 — wst — zb — C — yst — x _c — al — yst2 — a _n — ari-a ⁶ — x _s; chromosome 4: f9 — K — C — lg4 — lg ³ — gl2 — br2 — lk5 — yh. The centromere position on chromosome 5 was not precisely located.Contribution from the Department of Agronomy, Published with the approval of the director of the Colorado State University Experiment Station as Scientific Series Paper No. 2606. This research was supported in part by by NSF Grant GB 4482X and GB 30 493 to T. Tsuchiya and Colorado State University Experiment Station Hatch Project     

Plasticity and Epigenetic Inheritance of Centromere-specific Histone H3 (CENP-A)-containing Nucleosome Positioning in the Fission Yeast

Nucleosomes containing the specific histone H3 variant CENP-A mark the centromere locus on each chromatin and initiate kinetochore assembly. For the common type of regional centromeres, little is known in molecular detail of centromeric chromatin organization, its propagation through cell division, and how distinct organization patterns may facilitate kinetochore assembly. Here, we show that in the fission yeast S. pombe, a relatively small number of CENP-A/Cnp1 nucleosomes are found within the centromeric core and that their positioning relative to underlying DNA varies among genetically homogenous cells. Consistent with the flexible positioning of Cnp1 nucleosomes, a large portion of the endogenous centromere is dispensable for its essential activity in mediating chromosome segregation. We present biochemical evidence that Cnp1 occupancy directly correlates with silencing of the underlying reporter genes. Furthermore, using a newly developed pedigree analysis assay, we demonstrated the epigenetic inheritance of Cnp1 positioning and quantified the rate of occasional repositioning of Cnp1 nucleosomes throughout cell generations. Together, our results reveal the plasticity and the epigenetically inheritable nature of centromeric chromatin organization.     

Plc1p is required for proper chromatin structure and activity of the kinetochore in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis> by facilitating recruitment of the RSC complex

High-fidelity chromosome segregation during mitosis requires kinetochores, protein complexes that assemble on centromeric DNA and mediate chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules. In budding yeast, phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (Plc1p encoded by PLC1 gene) is important for function of kinetochores. Deletion of PLC1 results in alterations in chromatin structure of centromeres, reduced binding of microtubules to minichromosomes, and a higher frequency of chromosome loss. The mechanism of Plc1p’s involvement in kinetochore activity was not initially obvious; however, a testable hypothesis emerged with the discovery of the role of inositol polyphosphates (InsPs), produced by a Plc1p-dependent pathway, in the regulation of chromatin-remodeling complexes. In addition, the remodels structure of chromatin (RSC) chromatin-remodeling complex was found to associate with kinetochores and to affect centromeric chromatin structure. We report here that Plc1p and InsPs are required for recruitment of the RSC complex to kinetochores, which is important for establishing proper chromatin structure of centromeres and centromere proximal regions. Mutations in PLC1 and components of the RSC complex exhibit strong genetic interactions and display synthetic growth defect, altered nuclear morphology, and higher frequency of minichromosome loss. The results thus provide a mechanistic explanation for the previously elusive role of Plc1p and InsPs in kinetochore function. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Conserved and divergent mechanisms of inner kinetochore assembly onto centromeric chromatin

Kinetochores are large protein complexes built on centromeric chromatin that mediate chromosome segregation. The inner kinetochore, or constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN), assembles onto centromeres defined by centromere protein A (CENP-A) nucleosomes (CENP-A^Nuc), and acts as a platform for the regulated assembly of the microtubule-binding outer kinetochore. Recent cryo-EM work revealed structural conservation of CCAN, from the repeating human regional centromeres to the point centromere of budding yeast. Centromere recognition is determined mainly through engagement of duplex DNA proximal to the CENP-A nucleosome by a DNA-binding CENP-LN channel located at the core of CCAN. Additional DNA interactions formed by other CCAN modules create an enclosed DNA-binding chamber. This configuration explains how kinetochores maintain their tight grip on centromeric DNA to withstand the forces of chromosome segregation. Defining the higher-order architecture of complete kinetochore assemblies with implications for understanding the 3D organisation of regional centromeres and mechanisms of kinetochore dynamics, including how kinetochores sense and respond to tension, are important future directions.     

Chromatin digestion with restriction endonucleases reveals 150-160 bp of protected DNA in the centromere of chromosome XIV in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Summary Isolated nuclei of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were incubated with five restriction nucleases. Out of the twenty-one recognition sequences for these nucleases in the centromere region of chromosome XIV, only five are accessible to cleavage. These sites map 11 by and 74 by to the left and 27 bp, 41 by and 290 by to the right, respectively, of the boundaries of the 118 by functional CEN14 DNA sequence. The distance between the sites accessible to cleavage and closest to CEN14 is 156 bp, suggesting this is the maximal size of DNA protected in CEN14 chromatin. The DNA in CEN14 chromatin protected against cleavage with DNase I and micrococcal nuclease overlaps almost completely with this region. Hypersensitive regions flanking both sides are approximately 60 by long. Analyses of other S. cerevisiae centromeres with footprinting techniques in intact cells or nucleolytic cleavages in isolated nuclei are discussed in relation to our results. We conclude that structural data of chromatin obtained with restriction nucleases are reliable and that the structure of CEN14 chromatin is representative for S. cerevisiae centromeres.     

SGT1-HSP90 complex is required for CENP-A deposition at centromeres

The centromere plays an essential role in accurate chromosome segregation, and defects in its function lead to aneuploidy and thus cancer. The centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A is proposed to be the epigenetic mark of the centromere, as active centromeres require CENP-A–containing nucleosomes to direct the recruitment of multiple kinetochore proteins. CENP-A K124 ubiquitylation, mediated by CUL4A-RBX1-COPS8 E3 ligase activity, is required for CENP-A deposition at the centromere. However, the mechanism that controls the E3 ligase activity of the CUL4A-RBX1-COPS8 complex remains obscure. We have discovered that the SGT1-HSP90 complex is required for recognition of CENP-A by COPS8. Thus, the SGT1-HSP90 complex contributes to the E3 ligase activity of the CUL4A complex that is necessary for CENP-A ubiquitylation and CENP-A deposition at the centromere.     

Epigenetic analysis of kinetochore assembly on variant human centromeres

Human centromere formation involves the assembly of the mitotic kinetochore onto chromosomal locations that contain the interphase prekinetochore. Immunofluorescent analysis of two functionally converse human centromere variants, neocentromeres and inactive centromeres, has been used to evaluate the functional significance of over 24 CENTROMERE proteins, providing important insight into the epigenetics of centromere formation and kinetochore assembly.     

Acceptor-photobleaching FRET analysis of core kinetochore and NAC proteins in living human cells

Faithful chromatin segregation is mediated and controlled by the kinetochore protein network which assembles at centromeres. In this study, the neighbourhood relations of inner kinetochore and nucleosome-associated complex (NAC) proteins were analysed in living human interphase cells by acceptor photobleaching FRET. The data indicate that CENP-U is in close vicinity to CENP-I as well as to CENP-B and that CENP-M is close to CENP-T. This article has been submitted as a contribution to the Festschrift entitled “Uncovering cellular sub-structures by light microscopy” in honour of Professor Cremer’s 65th birthday.