It takes one to know one: Similarity to resident alien species increases establishment success of new invaders

Aim

Darwin's naturalization hypothesis states that dissimilarity to native species may benefit alien species establishment due to empty niches and reduced competition. We here add a new dimension to large‐scale tests of community invasibility, investigating the role that previously established alien species play in facilitating or hindering new invasions in plant communities.

Location

Permanent grasslands across France (including mainland and Corsica), as a receding ecosystem of great conservation importance.

Methods

Focusing on 121 alien plant species occurring in 7,215 vegetation plots, we quantified biotic similarity between new invaders and resident alien species (i.e., alien species with longer residence times) based on phylogenetic and trait distances. Additionally, we calculated distances to native species for each alien species and plot. Using multispecies distribution models, we analysed the influence of these biotic similarity measures and additional covariates on establishment success (presence/absence) of new invaders.

Results

We found that biotic similarity to resident alien species consistently increased establishment success of more recently introduced species. Phylogenetic relatedness to previous invaders had an equally strong positive effect as relatedness to native species. Conversely, trait similarity to natives hindered alien establishment as predicted by Darwin's naturalization hypothesis. These results highlight that various mechanisms may act simultaneously to determine alien establishment success.

Main conclusions

Our results suggest that, with greater similarity among alien species, invasion success increases. Such a pattern may arise either due to actual facilitation among invaders or as a result of weaker competitive interactions among invaders than between native and alien species, leading to an indirect facilitative effect. Alternatively, recent environmental changes (e.g., eutrophication, climate change) may have added new environmental filters. Determining how initial invasions might pave the road for subsequent invasions is crucial for effective multispecies management decisions and contributes a new aspect to our understanding of community assembly.

     

The nearness of you: the effect of population structure on siring success in a gynodioecious species

Theoretically, both balancing selection and genetic drift can contribute to the maintenance of gender polymorphism within and/or among populations. However, if strong differences exist among genotypes in the quantity of viable gametes they produce, then it is expected that these differences will play an important role in determining the relative frequency of the genotypes and contribute to whether or not such polymorphism is maintained. In this issue, De Cauwer et al. (2010) describe an investigation of gynodioecious wild sea beet, which in addition to containing females, contain two types of hermaphrodites: restored hermaphrodites carrying a cytoplasm that causes pollen sterility and a nuclear gene that restores pollen fertility, and hermaphrodites without the sterilizing cytoplasm. The results show that restored hermaphrodites, who have relatively low pollen viability, achieve disproportionately high siring success simply because of where they are located in a patchy population ( Fig. 1 ). Notably, these individuals tend to be close to females because of the genetics of sex determination. These results indicate that population structure caused by drift processes can have an unexpectedly large effect on the fitness of these low quality hermaphrodites, thereby contributing in the short term to the maintenance of gynodioecy in this population. While these results indicate that population structure caused by drift processes can have a large effect on the relative fitness of genetic variants, whether these effects promote or discourage the maintenance of polymorphism in the long term is still up for debate.

Figure 1 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint A stretch of beach along which wild sea beet can be seen to be growing among the rocks above the splash zone. This linear arrangement enhances the potential for mating success to depend on proximity to other plants (Photo: J.‐F. Arnaud).     

Experimental Invasions Using Biological Control Introductions: The Influence of Release Size on the Chance of Population Establishment

Introductions of biological control organisms offer a unique opportunity to experimentally study the process of invasion by exotic species. I used two chrysomelid beetles, Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla, which are currently being introduced into North America for the biological control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), to determine how the initial size of a release affects the probability that the introduced population grows and persists. I released both species into stands of their host plant at 36 sites scattered throughout central New York State using four release sizes: 20, 60, 180, and 540. I returned to these sites over the next 3 years to census the populations. For both species, the probability of population establishment increased with release size. Population growth rates also depended positively on release size. The implication from these results is that the demographic factors whose influence depends on population size or density such as demographic stochasticity, Allee effects, and genetics play important roles in the establishment of invading populations. A second set of releases was used to determine if it was at all possible for a single gravid female to found a population. Out of twenty individual females released, one female (a G. calmariensis) founded a population that persisted until the end of the study (3 generations). This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.