Domain analysis of the chloroplast polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals discrete functions in RNA degradation,polyadenylation, and sequence homology with exosome proteins

The molecular mechanism of mRNA degradation in the chloroplast consists of sequential events, including endonucleolytic cleavage, the addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to the endonucleolytic cleavage products, and exonucleolytic degradation. In spinach chloroplasts, the latter two steps of polyadenylation and exonucleolytic degradation are performed by the same phosphorolytic and processive enzyme, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). An analysis of its amino acid sequence shows that the protein is composed of two core domains related to RNase PH, two RNA binding domains (KH and S1), and an alpha-helical domain. The amino acid sequence and domain structure is largely conserved between bacteria and organelles. To define the molecular mechanism that controls the two opposite activities of this protein in the chloroplast, the ribonuclease, polymerase, and RNA binding properties of each domain were analyzed. The first core domain, which was predicted to be inactive in the bacterial enzymes, was active in RNA degradation but not in polymerization. Surprisingly, the second core domain was found to be active in degrading polyadenylated RNA only, suggesting that nonpolyadenylated molecules can be degraded only if tails are added, apparently by the same protein. The poly(A) high-binding-affinity site was localized to the S1 domain. The complete spinach chloroplast PNPase, as well as versions containing the core domains, complemented the cold sensitivity of an Escherichia coli PNPase-less mutant. Phylogenetic analyses of the two core domains showed that the two domains separated very early, resulting in the evolution of the bacterial and organelle PNPases and the exosome proteins found in eukaryotes and some archaea.     

RNA polyadenylation and degradation in cyanobacteria are similar to the chloroplast but different from Escherichia coli

The mechanism of RNA degradation in Escherichia coli involves endonucleolytic cleavage, polyadenylation of the cleavage product by poly(A) polymerase, and exonucleolytic degradation by the exoribonucleases, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase II. The poly(A) tails are homogenous, containing only adenosines in most of the growth conditions. In the chloroplast, however, the same enzyme, PNPase, polyadenylates and degrades the RNA molecule; there is no equivalent for the E. coli poly(A) polymerase enzyme. Because cyanobacteria is a prokaryote believed to be related to the evolutionary ancestor of the chloroplast, we asked whether the molecular mechanism of RNA polyadenylation in the Synechocystis PCC6803 cyanobacteria is similar to that in E. coli or the chloroplast. We found that RNA polyadenylation in Synechocystis is similar to that in the chloroplast but different from E. coli. No poly(A) polymerase enzyme exists, and polyadenylation is performed by PNPase, resulting in heterogeneous poly(A)-rich tails. These heterogeneous tails were found in the amino acid coding region, the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, as well as in rRNA and the single intron located at the tRNA(fmet). Furthermore, unlike E. coli, the inactivation of PNPase or RNase II genes caused lethality. Together, our results show that the RNA polyadenylation and degradation mechanisms in cyanobacteria and chloroplast are very similar to each other but different from E. coli.     

Blocking polyadenylation of mRNA in the chloroplast inhibits its degradation

The addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to endonuclease cleavage products of chloroplast mRNA has recently been suggested to target the polyadenylated RNA for rapid exonucleolytic degradation. This study analyzed whether the addition of a poly(A)-rich tail to RNA molecules is required for degradation by chloroplast exonuclease(s). In lyzed chloroplasts from spinach, addition of the polyadenylation inhibitor, cordycepin triphosphate (3′-dATP), inhibited the degradation of psbA and rbcL mRNAs. Furthermore, degradation intermediates generated by endonucleolytic cleavages accumulated. Similar results were obtained when yeast tRNA was added to the mRNA degradation system as a non-specific exoribonuclease inhibitor. Nevertheless, the stabilization mechanisms differ: while tRNA directly affects the exonuclease activity, 3′dATP has an indirect effect by inhibiting polyadenylation. The results indicate that the addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to endonucleolytic cleavage products of chloroplast mRNA is required to target these RNAs for rapid exonucleolytic degradation. Together with previous work, the data reported here support a model for mRNA degradation in the chloroplast in which endonucleolytic cleavages are followed by the addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to the proximal cleavage products, targeting these RNAs for rapid exonucleolytic decay.     

Characterization of the E.coli poly(A) polymerase: nucleotide specificity, RNA-binding affinities and RNA structure dependence

Polyadenylation of RNA molecules in bacteria and chloroplasts has been implicated as part of the RNA degradation pathway. The polyadenylation reaction is performed in Escherichia coli mainly by the enzyme poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I). In order to understand the molecular mechanism of RNA polyadenylation in bacteria, we characterized the biochemical properties of this reaction in vitro using the purified enzyme. Unlike the PAP from yeast nucleus, which is specific for ATP, E.coli PAP I can use all four nucleotide triphosphates as substrates for addition of long ribohomopolymers to RNA. PAP I displays a high binding activity to poly(U), poly(C) and poly(A) ribohomopolymers, but not to poly(G). The 3′-ends of most of the mRNA molecules in bacteria are characterized by a stem–loop structure. We show here that in vitro PAP I activity is inhibited by a stem–loop structure. A tail of two to six nucleotides located 3′ to the stem–loop structure is sufficient to overcome this inhibition. These results suggest that the stem–loop structure located in most of the mRNA 3′-ends may function as an inhibitor of polyadenylation and degradation of the corresponding RNA molecule. However, RNA 3′-ends produced by endonucleolytic cleavage by RNase E in single-strand regions of mRNA molecules may serve as efficient substrates for polyadenylation that direct these molecules for rapid exonucleolytic degradation.     

Different specificities of ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase in 3'mRNA decay.

We review recent evidence on the in vivo and in vitro mRNA degradation properties of 2 3'-exonucleases, ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase. Although secondary structures in the RNA can act as protective barriers against 3' exonucleolytic degradation, it appears that this effect depends on the stability of these structures. The fact that RNase II is more sensitive to RNA secondary structure than PNPase, could account for some differences observed in messenger degradation by the 2 enzymes in vivo. Terminator stem-loop structures are often very stable and 3' exonucleolytic degradation proceeds only after they have been eliminated by an endonucleolytic cleavage. Other secondary structures preceding terminator stem-loop seem to contribute to mRNA stability against exonucleolytic decay.     

Different specificities of ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase in 3'mRNA decay

We review recent evidence on the in vivo and in vitro mRNA degradation properties of 2 3'-exonucleases, ribonuclease II and polynucleotide phosphorylase. Although secondary structures in the RNA can act as protective barriers against 3' exonucleolytic degradation, it appears that this effect depends on the stability of these structures. The fact that RNase II is more sensitive to RNA secondary structure than PNPase, could account for some differences observed in messenger degradation by the 2 enzymes in vivo. Terminator stem-loop structures are often very stable and 3' exonucleolytic degradation proceeds only after they have been eliminated by an endonucleolytic cleavage. Other secondary structures preceding terminator stem-loop seem to contribute to mRNA stability against exonucleolytic decay.     

The RNA degradosome and poly(A) polymerase of Escherichia coli are required in vivo for the degradation of small mRNA decay intermediates containing REP-stabilizers

In Escherichia coli, REP-stabilizers are structural elements in polycistronic messages that protect 5'-proximal cistrons from 3'-->5' exonucleolytic degradation. The stabilization of a protected cistron can be an important determinant in the level of gene expression. Our results suggest that RNase E, an endoribonuclease, initiates the degradation of REP-stabilized mRNA. However, subsequent degradation of mRNA fragments containing a REP-stabilizer poses a special challenge to the mRNA degradation machinery. Two enzymes, the DEAD-box RNA helicase, RhlB and poly(A) polymerase (PAP) are required to facilitate the degradation of REP-stabilizers by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). This is the first in vivo evidence that these enzymes are required for the degradation of REP-stabilizers. Furthermore, our results show that REP degradation by RhlB and PNPase requires their association with RNase E as components of the RNA degradosome, thus providing the first in vivo evidence that this ribonucleolytic multienzyme complex is involved in the degradation of structured mRNA fragments.     

In vitro processing activity of Bacillus subtilis polynucleotide phosphorylase

A phosphate-dependent exonuclease activity was identified in purified protein fractions from Bacillus subtilis that were selected for binding to poly(I)-poly(C) agarose. Based on the characteristics of the degradation products and the absence of this activity in a pnpA strain, which contains a transposon insertion in the B. subtilis PNPase gene (Luttinger et al ., 1996 — accompanying paper), this exonuclease activity was shown to be due to polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). Processive 3'-to-5' exonucleolytic degradation of an SP82 phage RNA substrate was stalled at a particular site. Structure probing of the RNA showed that the stall site was downstream of a particular stem-loop structure. A similar stall site was observed for an RNA that comprised the intergenic region between the B. subtilis rpsO and pnpA genes. The ability to initiate degradation of a substrate that had a stem structure at its 3' end differed for the B. subtilis and Escherichia coli PNPase enzymes.     

Analysis of RNA cleavage at the adenovirus-2 L3 polyadenylation site.

Processing at the L3 polyadenylation site of human adenovirus-2 involves endonucleolytic cleavage generating the 3' terminal sequence -UAOH to which adenosine residues are added. This dinucleotide is 19 nucleotides downstream of the AAUAAA polyadenylation signal. The ATP analog cordycepin triphosphate (3' dATP) inhibits poly(A) synthesis, but precursor RNA is processed to give a product terminating in -UAAH. Addition of only one adenosine analog demonstrates that the initial poly(A) tract is synthesized by polymerization of single residues rather than by ligation of preformed poly(A). Cleavage is not coupled to polyadenylation since incubation with an ATP analog containing a non-hydrolyzable alpha--beta bond generates a product with a 3' terminus coincident with the -UAOH) addition site. Addition of this accurately processed RNA to a nuclear extract results in efficient polyadenylation, suggesting that downstream sequences are not required for synthesis of the poly(A) tract. Finally, processing at the L3 poly(A) site may involve both endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic activities.     

Preferential degradation of polyadenylated and polyuridinylated RNAs by the bacterial exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase.

Polyadenylation of mRNA has been shown to target the RNA molecule for rapid exonucleolytic degradation in bacteria. To elucidate the molecular mechanism governing this effect, we determined whether the Escherichia coli exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) preferably degrades polyadenylated RNA. When separately incubated with each molecule, isolated PNPase degraded polyadenylated and non-polyadenylated RNAs at similar rates. However, when the two molecules were mixed together, the polyadenylated RNA was degraded, whereas the non-polyadenylated RNA was stabilized. The same phenomenon was observed with polyuridinylated RNA. The poly(A) tail has to be located at the 3' end of the RNA, as the addition of several other nucleotides at the 3' end prevented competition for polyadenylated RNA. In RNA-binding experiments, E. coli PNPase bound to poly(A) and poly(U) sequences with much higher affinity than to poly(C) and poly(G). This high binding affinity defines poly(A) and poly(U) RNAs as preferential substrates for this enzyme. The high affinity of PNPase for polyadenylated RNA molecules may be part of the molecular mechanism by which polyadenylated RNA is preferentially degraded in bacterial cells.     

Escherichia coli poly(A)-binding proteins that interact with components of degradosomes or impede RNA decay mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase E

The multifunctional ribonuclease RNase E and the 3'-exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) are major components of an Escherichia coli ribonucleolytic "machine" that has been termed the RNA degradosome. Previous work has shown that poly(A) additions to the 3' ends of RNA substrates affect RNA degradation by both of these enzymes. To better understand the mechanism(s) by which poly(A) tails can modulate ribonuclease action, we used selective binding in 1 m salt to identify E. coli proteins that interact at high affinity with poly(A) tracts. We report here that CspE, a member of a family of RNA-binding "cold shock" proteins, and S1, an essential component of the 30 S ribosomal subunit, are poly(A)-binding proteins that interact functionally and physically, respectively, with degradosome ribonucleases. We show that purified CspE impedes poly(A)-mediated 3' to 5' exonucleolytic decay by PNPase by interfering with its digestion through the poly(A) tail and also inhibits both internal cleavage and poly(A) tail removal by RNase E. The ribosomal protein S1, which is known to interact with sequences at the 5' ends of mRNA molecules during the initiation of translation, can bind to both RNase E and PNPase, but in contrast to CspE, did not affect the ribonucleolytic actions of these enzymes. Our findings raise the prospect that E. coli proteins that bind to poly(A) tails may link the functions of degradosomes and ribosomes.     

Polyadenylation accelerates degradation of chloroplast mRNA.

The expression of chloroplast genes is regulated by several mechanisms, one of which is the modulation of RNA stability. To understand how this regulatory step is controlled during chloroplast development, we have begun to define the mechanism of plastid mRNA degradation. We show here that the degradation petD mRNA involves endonucleolytic cleavage at specific sites upstream of the 3' stem-loop structure. The endonucleolytic petD cleavage products can be polyadenylated in vitro, and similar polyadenylated RNA products are detectable in vivo. PCR analysis of the psbA and psaA-psaB-rps14 operons revealed other polyadenylated endonucleolytic cleavage products, indicating that poly(A) addition appears to be an integral modification during chloroplast mRNA degradation. Polyadenylation promotes efficient degradation of the cleaved petD RNAs by a 3'-5' exoribonuclease. Furthermore, polyadenylation also plays an important role in the degradation of the petD mRNA 3' end. Although the 3' end stem-loop is usually resistant to nucleases, adenylation renders the secondary structure susceptible to the 3'-5' exoribonuclease. Analysis of 3' ends confirms that polyadenylation occurs in vivo, and reveals that the extent of adenylation increases during the degradation of plastid mRNA in the dark. Based on these results, we propose a novel mechanism for polyadenylation in the regulation of plastid mRNA degradation.