Protein hydrophobic collapse and early folding steps observed in a microfluidic mixer

We demonstrate that the sub-millisecond protein folding process referred to as "collapse" actually consists of at least two separate processes. We observe the UV fluorescence spectrum from naturally occurring tryptophans in three well-studied proteins, cytochrome c, apomyoglobin, and lysozyme, as a function of time in a microfluidic mixer with a dead time of approximately 20 mus. Single value decomposition of the time-dependent spectra reveal two separate processes: 1), a spectral shift which occurs within the mixing time; and 2), a fluorescence decay occurring between approximately 100 and 300 micros. We attribute the first process to hydrophobic collapse and the second process to the formation of the first native tertiary contacts.     

Protein folding. Effect of packing density on chain conformation

Recent lattice polymer simulations by Chan & Dill suggest that compactness may be a significant driving force in the formation of secondary structure. We have addressed the robustness of this conclusion for non-lattice polymers using a rotational isomeric model of proteins. Boundary conditions are used to enforce compactness and excluded volume effects are explicitly incorporated. As in the cubic lattice studies, compactness is seen to influence secondary structure content. This effect is modest for densities comparable to native proteins but dramatic for chains that are approximately 30% more dense than native proteins. alpha-Helical structure is common but beta-sheet structure is rare. It appears that lattices impart to compact chains an organizational bias that favors beta-sheet structure. The strengths and weakness of various simplified representations of polypeptide chains are also discussed.     

Protein folding

The importance of protein folding in the biosynthesis of proteins is reviewed.     

Protein folding

The problem of protein folding is that how proteins acquire their native unique three‐dimensional structure in the physiological milieu. To solve the problem, the following key questions should be answered: do proteins fold co‐ or post‐translationally, i.e. during or after biosynthesis, what is the mechanism of protein folding, and what is the explanation for fast folding of proteins? The two first questions are discussed in the current review. The general lines are to show that the opinion, that proteins fold after they are synthesized is hardly substantiated and suitable for solving the problem of protein folding and why proteins should fold cotranslationally. A possible tentative model for the mechanism of protein folding is also suggested. To this end, a thorough analysis is made of the biosynthesis, delivery to the folding compartments, and the rates of the biosynthesis, translocation and folding of proteins. A cursory attention is assigned to the role of GroEL/ES‐like chaperonins in protein folding.     

Protein folding and chaperonins

The folding of polypeptide chains in cells, following either translation or translocation through membranes, must take place under conditions of extremely high protein concentrations. In addition, folding into a correct structure must occur in the presence of other rapidly folding species, and at temperatures known to destabilize aggregation-prone folding intermediates. To facilitate folding in vivo, molecular chaperones have evolved that stabilize protein folding intermediates, thus partitioning them towards a pathway leading to the native state rather than forming inactive aggregated structures.     

Protein folding and diseases

For most of proteins to be active, they need well-defined three-dimensional structures alone or in complex. Folding is a process through which newly synthesized proteins get to the native state. Protein folding inside cells is assisted by various chaperones and folding factors, and misfolded proteins are eliminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation system to ensure high fidelity of protein expression. Under certain circumstances, misfolded proteins escape the degradation process, yielding to deposit of protein aggregates such as loop-sheet polymer and amyloid fibril. Diseases characterized by insoluble deposits of proteins have been recognized for long time and are grouped as conformational diseases. Study of protein folding mechanism is required for better understanding of the molecular pathway of such conformational diseases.     

Protein folding mechanisms and the multidimensional folding funnel

An important idea that emerges from the energy landscape theory of protein folding is that subtle global features of the protein landscape can profoundly affect the apparent mechanism of folding. The relationship between various characteristic temperatures in the phase diagrams and landmarks in the folding funnel at fixed temperatures can be used to classify different folding behaviors. The one-dimensional picture of a folding funnel classifies folding kinetics into four basic scenarios, depending on the relative location of the thermodynamic barrier and the glass transition as a function of a single-order parameter. However, the folding mechanism may not always be quantitatively described by a single-order parameter. Several other order parameters, such as degree of secondary structure formation, collapse and topological order, are needed to establish the connection between minimalist models and proteins in the laboratory. In this article we describe a simple multidimensional funnel based on two-order parameters that measure the degree of collapse and topological order. The appearance of several different “mechanisms” is illustrated by analyzing lattice models with different potentials and sequences with different degrees of design. In most cases, the two-dimensional analysis leads to a classification of mechanisms totally in keeping with the one-dimensional scheme, but a topologically distinct scenario of fast folding with traps also emerges. The nature of traps depends on the relative location of the glass transition surface and the thermodynamic barrier in the multidimensional funnel. Proteins 32:136–158, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Protein folding forces

We investigate the average inter-residue folding forces derived from mutational data of the 15 proteins: barstar, barnase, chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2), Src SH3 domain, spectrin R16 domain, Arc repressor, apo-azurin, cold shock protein B (cspB), C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L9 (CTL9), FKBP12, α-lactalbumin, colicin E7 immunity protein 7 (IM7), colicin E9 immunity protein 9 (IM9), spectrin R17 domain, and ubiquitin. The residue-specific contributions to folding in most of the 15 protein molecules are highly non-uniformly distributed and are typically about 1 piconewton (pN) per interaction. The strongest folding forces often occur in some of the helices and strands of folding nuclei which suggests that folding nucleation−condensation is partially directed by formation of some secondary structure interactions. The correlation of the energy changes of mutants with inter-residue contact maps of the protein molecules provides a higher resolution than assigning the mutant data to certain positions in the polypeptide strand alone. In contrast to previous Φ-value analysis, we now can partially resolve folding motions. Compaction of at least one α-helix along its axis mediated by internal hydrogen bonds and stabilized by diffuse tertiary structure interactions appears to be one important molecular event during early folding in barstar, CI2, spectrin R16 domain, Arc repressor, α-lactalbumin, IM7, IM9, and spectrin R17 domain. A lateral movement of at least two strands neighbored in sequence towards each other appears to be involved in early folding of the SH3 domain, cspB, CTL9, and FKBP12.     

Protein folding and tRNA biology

Polypeptides can fold into tertiary structures while they are synthesized by the ribosome. In addition to the amino acid sequence, protein folding is determined by several factors within the cell. Among others, the folding pathway of a nascent polypeptide can be affected by transient interactions with other proteins, ligands, or the ribosome, as well as by the translocation through membrane pores. Particularly, the translation machinery and the population of tRNA under different physiological or adaptive responses can dramatically affect protein folding. This review summarizes the scientific evidence describing the role of translation kinetics and tRNA populations on protein folding and addresses current efforts to better understand tRNA biology. It is organized into three main parts, which are focused on: (i) protein folding in the cellular context; (ii) tRNA biology and the complexity of the tRNA population; and (iii) available methods and technical challenges in the characterization of tRNA pools. In this manner, this work illustrates the ways by which functional properties of proteins may be modulated by cellular tRNA populations.     

Protein folding and wring resonances

The polypeptide chain of a protein is shown to obey topological constraints which enable long range excitations in the form of wring modes of the protein backbone. Wring modes of proteins of specific lengths can therefore resonate with molecular modes present in the cell. It is suggested that protein folding takes place when the amplitude of a wring excitation becomes so large that it is energetically favorable to bend the protein backbone. The condition under which such structural transformations can occur is found, and it is shown that both cold and hot denaturation (the unfolding of proteins) are natural consequences of the suggested wring mode model. Native (folded) proteins are found to possess an intrinsic standing wring mode.     

Nonuniform chain collapse during early stages of staphylococcal nuclease folding detected by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and ultrarapid mixing methods

The development of tertiary structure during folding of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) was studied by time‐resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer measured using continuous‐ and stopped‐flow techniques. Variants of this two‐domain protein containing intradomain and interdomain fluorescence donor/acceptor pairs (Trp and Cys‐linked fluorophore or quencher) were prepared to probe the intradomain and interdomain structural evolution accompanying SNase folding. The intra‐domain donor/acceptor pairs are within the β‐barrel domain (Trp27/Cys64 and Trp27/Cys97) and the interdomain pair is between the α‐helical domain and the β‐barrel domain (Trp140/Cys64). Time‐resolved energy transfer efficiency accompanying folding and unfolding at different urea concentrations was measured over a time range from 30 μs to ～10 s. Information on average donor/acceptor distances at different stages of the folding process was obtained by using a quantitative kinetic modeling approach. The average distance for the donor/acceptor pairs in the β‐barrel domain decreases to nearly native values whereas that of the interdomain donor/acceptor pairs remains unchanged in the earliest intermediate (<500 μs of refolding). This indicates a rapid nonuniform collapse resulting in an ensemble of heterogeneous conformations in which the central region of the β‐barrel domain is well developed while the C‐terminal α‐helical domain remains disordered. The distance between Trp140 and Cys64 decreases to native values on the 100‐ms time scale, indicating that the α‐helical domain docks onto the preformed β‐barrel at a late stage of the folding. In addition, the unfolded state is found to be more compact under native conditions, suggesting that changes in solvent conditions may induce a nonspecific hydrophobic collapse.     

Protein folding and protein refolding.

The functional three-dimensional structure of proteins is determined solely by their amino acid sequences. Protein folding occurs spontaneously beginning with the formation of local secondary structure concomitant with a compaction of the molecule. Secondary structure elements subsequently interact to form subdomains and domains stabilized by tertiary interactions. Disulfide bond formation, and cis-trans isomerization of X-Pro peptide bonds, as the rate-limiting folding reactions, are enzymatically catalyzed during protein folding in the cell. Although folding of domains is fast enough to occur cotranslationally in vivo, such vectorial folding on the ribosome is not essential for attainment of the native structure of a protein. Slow steps on the pathway to the functional protein structure are docking reactions of domains, association of subunits, or reshuffling reactions at the oligomer level. Aggregation as a competing side reaction is prevented, and the kinetic partition between competing polypeptide folding and translocation reactions is regulated by chaperone proteins binding to incompletely folded polypeptides.     

Protein folding: then and now

Over the past three decades the protein folding field has undergone monumental changes. Originally a purely academic question, how a protein folds has now become vital in understanding diseases and our abilities to rationally manipulate cellular life by engineering protein folding pathways. We review and contrast past and recent developments in the protein folding field. Specifically, we discuss the progress in our understanding of protein folding thermodynamics and kinetics, the properties of evasive intermediates, and unfolded states. We also discuss how some abnormalities in protein folding lead to protein aggregation and human diseases.