In vitro reconstitution of mammalian U2 and U5 snRNPs active in splicing: Sm proteins are functionally interchangeable and are essential for the formation of functional U2 and U5 snRNPs.

An in vitro reconstitution/splicing complementation system has been developed which has allowed the investigation of the role of mammalian U2 and U5 snRNP components in splicing. U2 or U5 snRNP cores are first reconstituted from purified native snRNP core proteins and snRNA in the absence of cellular extract and are subsequently added to splicing extracts depleted of either U2 or U5 snRNP. When snRNPs reconstituted with HeLa U2 or U5 snRNA were added to U2- or U5-depleted nuclear extract, splicing was complemented. Addition of naked snRNA, on the other hand, did not restore splicing, demonstrating that the core proteins are essential for both U2 and U5 snRNP functions in splicing. Hybrid U2 or U5 snRNPs, reconstituted with core proteins isolated from U1 or U2 snRNPs, were equally active in splicing complementation, indicating that the snRNP core proteins are functionally interchangeable. U5 snRNPs reconstituted from in vitro transcribed U5 snRNA restored splicing to a level identical to that observed with particles reconstituted from authentic HeLa U5 snRNA. In contrast, splicing could not be restored to U2-depleted extract by the addition of snRNPs reconstituted from synthetic U2 snRNA, suggesting that U2 snRNA base modifications are essential for U2 snRNP function.     

U1 SnRNP association with HnRNP involves an initial non-specific splice-site independent interaction of U1 SnRNP protein with HnRNA

Precursor mRNA is complexed with proteins in the cell nucleus to form heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP), and these hnRNPs are found associated in vivo with small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs) for the processing of pre-mRNA. In order to better characterize the ATP-independent initial association of U1 snRNP with hnRNP, an important early event in assembly of the spliceosome complex, we have determined some of the components essential to an in vitro reassociation of U1 snRNP with hnRNP. U1 snRNP reassociated in vitro with 40S hnRNP particles from HeLa cells and, similar to the in vivo hnRNP/U1 snRNP association, the in vitro interaction was sensitive to high salt concentrations. U1 snRNP also associated with in vitro reconstituted hnRNP in which bacteriophage MS2 RNA, which lacks introns, was used as the RNA component. Purified snRNA alone would not associate with the MS2 RNA-reconstituted hnRNP, however, intact U1 snRNP did interact with protein-free MS2 RNA. This indicates that the U1 snRNP proteins are required for the hnRNP/U1 snRNP association, but hnRNP proteins are not. Thus, the initial, ATP-independent association of U1 snRNP with hnRNP seems to be mediated by U1 snRNP protein(s) associating with hnRNA without requiring a splice-site sequence. This complex may then be further stabilized by intron-specific interactions and hnRNP proteins, as well as by other snRNPs.     

Monospecific antibodies reveal details of U2 snRNP structure and interaction between U1 and U2 snRNPs.

Monospecific antibodies directed against several U small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U snRNP) particle proteins were affinity purified from a patient's anti-(U1,U2)RNP serum. These were used to demonstrate that: (i) proteins equivalent to the mammalian U2 snRNP-specific A' and B" proteins are present in Xenopus laevis oocytes; (ii) both proteins A' and B" have the same structural requirements for binding to U2 snRNA; (iii) proteins B, B' and D have the same structural requirement for binding to U2 snRNA; (iv) using very high specific activity RNA probes it is possible to detect a fraction of either U1 or U2 snRNA precipitable by antibodies directed against proteins specific for the other U snRNP, indicating an interaction between U1 and U2 snRNPs. The structural requirements of this interaction were studied for the U2 snRNP. All changes made to U2 snRNA or snRNP structure resulted in loss of the interaction with U1 snRNP.     

Functional organization of the Sm core in the crystal structure of human U1 snRNP

U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) recognizes the 5′‐splice site early during spliceosome assembly. It represents a prototype spliceosomal subunit containing a paradigmatic Sm core RNP. The crystal structure of human U1 snRNP obtained from natively purified material by in situ limited proteolysis at 4.4 Å resolution reveals how the seven Sm proteins, each recognize one nucleotide of the Sm site RNA using their Sm1 and Sm2 motifs. Proteins D1 and D2 guide the snRNA into and out of the Sm ring, and proteins F and E mediate a direct interaction between the Sm site termini. Terminal extensions of proteins D1, D2 and B/B′, and extended internal loops in D2 and B/B′ support a four‐way RNA junction and a 3′‐terminal stem‐loop on opposite sides of the Sm core RNP, respectively. On a higher organizational level, the core RNP presents multiple attachment sites for the U1‐specific 70K protein. The intricate, multi‐layered interplay of proteins and RNA rationalizes the hierarchical assembly of U snRNPs in vitro and in vivo.     

Reconstitution of the human U snRNP assembly machinery reveals stepwise Sm protein organization

The assembly of spliceosomal U snRNPs depends on the coordinated action of PRMT5 and SMN complexes in vivo. These trans‐acting factors enable the faithful delivery of seven Sm proteins onto snRNA and the formation of the common core of snRNPs. To gain mechanistic insight into their mode of action, we reconstituted the assembly machinery from recombinant sources. We uncover a stepwise and ordered formation of distinct Sm protein complexes on the PRMT5 complex, which is facilitated by the assembly chaperone pICln. Upon completion, the formed pICln‐Sm units are displaced by new pICln‐Sm protein substrates and transferred onto the SMN complex. The latter acts as a Brownian machine that couples spontaneous conformational changes driven by thermal energy to prevent mis‐assembly and to ensure the transfer of Sm proteins to cognate RNA. Investigation of mutant SMN complexes provided insight into the contribution of individual proteins to these activities. The biochemical reconstitution presented here provides a basis for a detailed molecular dissection of the U snRNP assembly reaction.     

In vitro reconstitution of mammalian U1 snRNPs active in splicing: the U1-C protein enhances the formation of early (E) spliceosomal complexes.

We have established an in vitro reconstitution/splicing complementation system which has allowed the investigation of the role of mammalian U1 snRNP components both in splicing and at the early stages of spliceosome formation. U1 snRNPs reconstituted from purified, native snRNP proteins and either authentic or in vitro transcribed U1 snRNA restored both early (E) splicing complex formation and splicing-activity to U1-depleted extracts. In vitro reconstituted U1 snRNPs possessing an m3G or ApppG cap were equally active in splicing, demonstrating that a physiological cap structure is not absolutely required for U1 function. However, the presence of an m7GpppG or GpppG cap was deleterious to splicing, most likely due to competition for the m7G cap binding proteins. No significant reduction in splicing or E complex formation was detected with U1 snRNPs reconstituted from U1 snRNA lacking the RNA binding sites of the U1-70K or U1-A protein (i.e., stem-loop I and II, respectively). Complementation studies with purified HeLa U1 snRNPs lacking subsets of the U1-specific proteins demonstrated a role for the U1-C, but not U1-A, protein in the formation and/or stabilization of early splicing complexes. Studies with recombinant U1-C protein mutants indicated that the N-terminal domain of U1-C is necessary and sufficient for the stimulation of E complex formation.     

The association of the U1-specific 70K and C proteins with U1 snRNPs is mediated in part by common U snRNP proteins.

The U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP)-specific 70K and A proteins are known to bind directly to stem-loops of the U1 snRNA, whereas the U1-C protein does not bind to naked U1 snRNA, but depends on other U1 snRNP protein components for its association. Focusing on the U1-70K and U1-C proteins, protein-protein interactions contributing to the association of these particle-specific proteins with the U1 snRNP were studied. Immunoprecipitation of complexes formed after incubation of naked U1 snRNA or purified U1 snRNPs lacking their specific proteins (core U1 snRNP) with in vitro translated U1-C protein, revealed that both common snRNP proteins and the U1-70K protein are required for the association of U1-C with the U1 snRNP. Binding studies with various in vitro translated U1-70K mutants demonstrated that the U1-70K N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for the interaction of U1-C with core U1 snRNPs. Surprisingly, several N-terminal fragments of the U1-70K protein, which lacked the U1-70K RNP-80 motif and did not bind naked U1 RNA, associated stably with core U1 snRNPs. This suggests that a new U1-70K binding site is generated upon association of common U1 snRNP proteins with U1 RNA. The interaction between the N-terminal domain of U1-70K and the core RNP domain was specific for the U1 snRNP; stable binding was not observed with core U2 or U5 snRNPs, suggesting essential structural differences among snRNP core domains. Evidence for direct protein-protein interactions between U1-specific proteins and common snRNP proteins was supported by chemical crosslinking experiments using purified U1 snRNPs. Individual crosslinks between the U1-70K and the common D2 or B'/B protein, as well as between U1-C and B'/B, were detected. A model for the assembly of U1 snRNP is presented in which the complex of common proteins on the RNA backbone functions as a platform for the association of the U1-specific proteins.     

Conserved loop I of U5 small nuclear RNA is dispensable for both catalytic steps of pre-mRNA splicing in HeLa nuclear extracts

The function of conserved regions of the metazoan U5 snRNA was investigated by reconstituting U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) from purified snRNP proteins and HeLa or Xenopus U5 snRNA mutants and testing their ability to restore splicing to U5-depleted nuclear extracts. Substitution of conserved nucleotides comprising internal loop 2 or deletion of internal loop 1 had no significant effect on the ability of reconstituted U5 snRNPs to complement splicing. However, deletion of internal loop 2 abolished U5 activity in splicing and spliceosome formation. Surprisingly, substitution of the invariant loop 1 nucleotides with a GAGA tetraloop had no effect on U5 activity. Furthermore, U5 snRNPs reconstituted from an RNA formed by annealing the 5' and 3' halves of the U5 snRNA, which lacked all loop 1 nucleotides, complemented both steps of splicing. Thus, in contrast to yeast, loop 1 of the human U5 snRNA is dispensable for both steps of splicing in HeLa nuclear extracts. This suggests that its function can be compensated for in vitro by other spliceosomal components: for example, by proteins associated with the U5 snRNP. Consistent with this idea, immunoprecipitation studies indicated that several functionally important U5 proteins associate stably with U5 snRNPs containing a GAGA loop 1 substitution.     

Discrete domains of human U6 snRNA required for the assembly of U4/U6 snRNP and splicing complexes.

U6 snRNA sequences required for assembly of U4/U6 snRNP and splicing complexes were determined by in vitro reconstitution of snRNPs. Both mutagenesis and chemical modification/interference assays identify a U6 snRNA domain required for U4/U6 snRNP formation. The results support the existence of a U4/U6 snRNA interaction domain previously proposed on the basis of phylogenetic evidence. In addition, two short U6 snRNA regions flanking the U4/U6 interaction domain are essential to assemble the U4/U6 snRNP into splicing complexes. These two regions may represent binding sites for splicing factors or may facilitate the formation of an alternative U6 snRNA secondary structure during spliceosome assembly.     

Sequence-specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein complex functions in the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and prob ably other RNPs. All spliceosomal snRNPs have a common core of seven Sm proteins. To mediate the assembly of snRNPs, the SMN complex must be able to bring together Sm proteins with U snRNAs. We showed previously that SMN and other components of the SMN complex interact directly with several Sm proteins. Here, we show that the SMN complex also interacts specifically with U1 snRNA. The stem--loop 1 domain of U1 (SL1) is necessary and sufficient for SMN complex binding in vivo and in vitro. Substitution of three nucleotides in the SL1 loop (SL1A3) abolishes SMN interaction, and the corresponding U1 snRNA (U1A3) is impaired in U1 snRNP biogenesis. Microinjection of excess SL1 but not SL1A3 into Xenopus oocytes inhibits SMN complex binding to U1 snRNA and U1 snRNP assembly. These findings indicate that SMN complex interaction with SL1 is sequence-specific and critical for U1 snRNP biogenesis, further supporting the direct role of the SMN complex in RNP biogenesis.     

p54nrb/NonO and PSF promote U snRNA nuclear export by accelerating its export complex assembly

The assembly of spliceosomal U snRNPs in metazoans requires nuclear export of U snRNA precursors. Four factors, nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC), phosphorylated adaptor for RNA export (PHAX), the export receptor CRM1 and RanGTP, gather at the m⁷G-cap-proximal region and form the U snRNA export complex. Here we show that the multifunctional RNA-binding proteins p54nrb/NonO and PSF are U snRNA export stimulatory factors. These proteins, likely as a heterodimer, accelerate the recruitment of PHAX, and subsequently CRM1 and Ran onto the RNA substrates in vitro, which mediates efficient U snRNA export in vivo. Our results reveal a new layer of regulation for U snRNA export and, hence, spliceosomal U snRNP biogenesis.     

RNA-protein organization of U1, U5 and U4-U6 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins in HeLa cells

Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) containing U1 and U5 snRNAs from HeLa cells have been fractionated using a combination of isopycnic centrifugation in cesium chloride and ion-exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose. The procedure is based on the extreme stability conferred upon snRNPs by Mg2+ enabling them to withstand the very high ionic strength that prevails in cesium chloride. U1 snRNP prepared by this method contains all nine major proteins (68K, A, B, B', C, D, E, F, G) corresponding to those previously identified by immunoprecipitation and is therefore precipitable by anti-RNP and anti-Sm antibodies. U5 snRNP purified in this way contains the common D to G proteins and is also enriched in a 25 X 10(3) Mr protein that may be U5 snRNP-specific. The core-resistant U5 snRNA sequence (nucleotide 84 to 3' OH) covered by D to G proteins is extended by only six nucleotides. A similar situation is seen in U4-U6 snRNP, which we have obtained in a sufficiently pure form to examine protected sequences. However, the core-resistant sequence of U4 (nucleotide 116 to 3' OH) in U4-U6 snRNP is extended by 37 nucleotides, suggesting that the protein composition of this particle could be more complex than that of U5 snRNP. The ribonucleoprotein organization of snRNPs is summarized and discussed in view of our current knowledge on snRNA sequences protected by proteins.     

Direct binding of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein G to the Sm site of small nuclear RNA. Ultraviolet light cross-linking of protein G to the AAU stretch within the Sm site (AAUUUGUGG) of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein reconstituted in vitro.

The major small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U5 and U4/U6 participate in the splicing of pre-mRNA. U1, U2, U4 and U5 RNAs share a highly conserved sequence motif PuA(U)nGPu, termed the Sm site, which is normally flanked by two hairpin loops. The Sm site provides the major binding site for the group of common proteins, B', B, D1, D2, D3, E, F and G, which are shared by the spliceosomal snRNPs. We have investigated the ability of common snRNP proteins to recognize the Sm site of snRNA by using ultraviolet light-induced RNA-protein cross-linking within U1 snRNP particles. The U1 snRNP particles, reconstituted in vitro, contained U1 snRNA labelled with 32P. Cross-linking of protein to this U1 snRNA occurred only in the presence of the single-stranded stretch of snRNA that makes up the conserved Sm site. Characterization of the cross-linked protein by one and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis indicated that snRNP protein G had become cross-linked to the U1 snRNA. This was confirmed by specific immunoprecipitation of the cross-linked RNA-protein complex with an anti-G antiserum. The cross-link was located on the U1 snRNA by fingerprint analysis with RNases T1 and A; this demonstrated that the protein G has been cross-linked to the AAU stretch within the 5'-terminal half of the Sm site (AAUUUGUGG). These results suggest that the snRNP protein G may be involved in the direct recognition of the Sm site.     

Essential Role of a Trypanosome U4-Specific Sm Core Protein in Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Assembly and Splicing

Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) in trypanosomes contain either the canonical heptameric Sm ring or variant Sm cores with snRNA-specific Sm subunits. Here we show biochemically by a combination of RNase H cleavage and tandem affinity purification that the U4 snRNP contains a variant Sm heteroheptamer core in which only SmD3 is replaced by SSm4. This U4-specific, nuclear-localized Sm core protein is essential for growth and splicing. As shown by RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown, SSm4 is specifically required for the integrity of the U4 snRNA and the U4/U6 di-snRNP in trypanosomes. In addition, we demonstrate by in vitro reconstitution of Sm cores that under stringent conditions, the SSm4 protein suffices to specify the assembly of U4 Sm cores. Together, these data indicate that the assembly of the U4-specific Sm core provides an essential step in U4/U6 di-snRNP biogenesis and splicing in trypanosomes.The excision of intronic sequences from precursor mRNAs is a critical step during eukaryotic gene expression. This reaction is catalyzed by the spliceosome, a macromolecular complex composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and many additional proteins. Spliceosome assembly and splicing catalysis occur in an ordered multistep process, which includes multiple conformational rearrangements (35). Spliceosomal snRNPs are assembled from snRNAs and protein components, the latter of which fall into two classes: snRNP-specific and common proteins. The common or canonical core proteins are also termed Sm proteins, specifically SmB, SmD1, SmD2, SmD3, SmE, SmF, and SmG (10; reviewed in reference 9), which all share an evolutionarily conserved bipartite sequence motif (Sm1 and Sm2) required for Sm protein interactions and the formation of the heteroheptameric Sm core complex around the Sm sites of the snRNAs (3, 7, 29). Prior to this, the Sm proteins form three heteromeric subcomplexes: SmD3/SmB, SmD1/SmD2, and SmE/SmF/SmG (23; reviewed in reference 34). Individual Sm proteins or Sm subcomplexes cannot stably interact with the snRNA. Instead, a stable subcore forms by an association of the subcomplexes SmD1/SmD2 and SmE/SmF/SmG with the Sm site on the snRNA; the subsequent integration of the SmD3/SmB heterodimer completes Sm core assembly.In addition to the canonical Sm proteins, other proteins carrying the Sm motif have been identified for many eukaryotes. Those proteins, termed LSm (like Sm) proteins, exist in distinct heptameric complexes that differ in function and localization. For example, a complex composed of LSm1 to LSm7 (LSm1-7) accumulates in cytoplasmic foci and participates in mRNA turnover (4, 8, 31). Another complex, LSm2-8, binds to the 3′ oligo(U) tract of the U6 snRNA in the nucleus (1, 15, 24). Finally, in the U7 snRNP, which is involved in histone mRNA 3′-end processing, the Sm proteins SmD1 and SmD2 are replaced by U7-specific LSm10 and LSm11 proteins, respectively (20, 21; reviewed in reference 28).This knowledge is based primarily on the mammalian system, where spliceosomal snRNPs are biochemically well characterized (34). In contrast, for trypanosomes, comparatively little is known about the components of the splicing machinery and their assembly and biogenesis. In trypanosomes, the expression of all protein-encoding genes, which are arranged in long polycistronic units, requires trans splicing. Only a small number of genes are additionally processed by cis splicing (reviewed in reference 11). During trans splicing, a short noncoding miniexon, derived from the spliced leader (SL) RNA, is added to each protein-encoding exon. Regarding the trypanosomal splicing machinery, the U2, U4/U6, and U5 snRNPs are considered to be general splicing factors, whereas the U1 and SL snRNPs represent cis- and trans-splicing-specific components, respectively. In addition to the snRNAs, many protein splicing factors in trypanosomes have been identified based on sequence homology (for example, see references 14 and 19).Recent studies revealed variations in the Sm core compositions of spliceosomal snRNPs from Trypanosoma brucei. Specifically, in the U2 snRNP, two of the canonical Sm proteins, SmD3 and SmB, are replaced by two novel, U2 snRNP-specific proteins, Sm16.5K and Sm15K (33). In this case, an unusual purine nucleotide, interrupting the central uridine stretch of the U2 snRNA Sm site, discriminates between the U2-specific and the canonical Sm cores. A second case of Sm core variation was reported for the U4 snRNP, in which a single protein, SmD3, was suggested to be replaced by the U4-specific LSm protein initially called LSm2, and later called SSm4, based on a U4-specific destabilization after SSm4 knockdown (30). A U4-specific Sm core variation was also previously suggested and discussed by Wang et al. (33), based on the inefficient pulldown of U4 snRNA through tagged SmD3 protein. However, neither of these two studies conclusively demonstrated by biochemical criteria that the specific Sm protein resides in the U4 Sm core; a copurification of other snRNPs could not be unequivocally ruled out.By using a combination of RNase H cleavage, tandem affinity purification, and mass spectrometry, we provide here direct biochemical evidence that in the variant Sm core of the U4 snRNP, only SmD3 is replaced by the U4-specific SSm4. SSm4 is nuclear localized, and the silencing of SSm4 leads to a characteristic phenotype: dramatic growth inhibition, general trans- and cis-splicing defects, a loss of the integrity of the U4 snRNA, as well as a destabilization of the U4/U6 di-snRNP. Furthermore, in vitro reconstitution assays revealed that under stringent conditions, SSm4 is sufficient to specify U4-specific Sm core assembly. In sum, our data establish SSm4 as a specific component of the U4 Sm core and demonstrate its importance in U4/U6 di-snRNP biogenesis, splicing function, and cell viability.     

U1 small nuclear RNA variants differentially form ribonucleoprotein particles in vitro

The U1 small nuclear (sn)RNA participates in splicing of pre-mRNAs by recognizing and binding to 5′ splice sites at exon/intron boundaries. U1 snRNAs associate with 5′ splice sites in the form of ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) that are comprised of the U1 snRNA and 10 core components, including U1A, U1-70K, U1C and the ‘Smith antigen’, or Sm, heptamer. The U1 snRNA is highly conserved across a wide range of taxa; however, a number of reports have identified the presence of expressed U1-like snRNAs in multiple species, including humans. While numerous U1-like molecules have been shown to be expressed, it is unclear whether these variant snRNAs have the capacity to form snRNPs and participate in splicing. The purpose of the present study was to further characterize biochemically the ability of previously identified human U1-like variants to form snRNPs and bind to U1 snRNP proteins. A bioinformatics analysis provided support for the existence of multiple expressed variants. In vitro gel shift assays, competition assays, and immunoprecipitations (IPs) revealed that the variants formed high molecular weight assemblies to varying degrees and associated with core U1 snRNP proteins to a lesser extent than the canonical U1 snRNA. Together, these data suggest that the human U1 snRNA variants analyzed here are unable to efficiently bind U1 snRNP proteins. The current work provides additional biochemical insights into the ability of the variants to assemble into snRNPs.     

Role of Cajal Bodies and Nucleolus in the Maturation of the U1 snRNP in Arabidopsis

Background

The biogenesis of spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in both the cytoplasm where Sm core proteins are added and snRNAs are modified at the 5′ and 3′ termini and in the nucleus where snRNP-specific proteins associate. U1 snRNP consists of U1 snRNA, seven Sm proteins and three snRNP-specific proteins, U1-70K, U1A, and U1C. It has been shown previously that after import to the nucleus U2 and U4/U6 snRNP-specific proteins first appear in Cajal bodies (CB) and then in splicing speckles. In addition, in cells grown under normal conditions U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs/snRNPs are abundant in CBs. Therefore, it has been proposed that the final assembly of these spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in this nuclear compartment. In contrast, U1 snRNA in both animal and plant cells has rarely been found in this nuclear compartment.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we analysed the subnuclear distribution of Arabidopsis U1 snRNP-specific proteins fused to GFP or mRFP in transiently transformed Arabidopsis protoplasts. Irrespective of the tag used, U1-70K was exclusively found in the nucleus, whereas U1A and U1C were equally distributed between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In the nucleus all three proteins localised to CBs and nucleoli although to different extent. Interestingly, we also found that the appearance of the three proteins in nuclear speckles differ significantly. U1-70K was mostly found in speckles whereas U1A and U1C in ∼90% of cells showed diffuse nucleoplasmic in combination with CBs and nucleolar localisation.

Conclusions/Significance

Our data indicate that CBs and nucleolus are involved in the maturation of U1 snRNP. Differences in nuclear accumulation and distribution between U1-70K and U1A and U1C proteins may indicate that either U1-70K or U1A and U1C associate with, or is/are involved, in other nuclear processes apart from pre-mRNA splicing.     

U2 snRNA-protein contacts in purified human 17S U2 snRNPs and in spliceosomal A and B complexes

The 17S U2 snRNP plays an essential role in branch point selection and catalysis during pre-mRNA splicing. Much remains to be learned about the molecular architecture of the U2 snRNP, including which proteins contact the functionally important 5' end of the U2 snRNA. Here, RNA-protein interactions within immunoaffinity-purified human 17S U2 snRNPs were analyzed by lead(II)-induced RNA cleavage and UV cross-linking. Contacts between the U2 snRNA and SF3a60, SF3b49, SF3b14a/p14 and SmG and SmB were detected. SF3b49 appears to make multiple contacts, interacting with the 5' end of U2 and nucleotides in loops I and IIb. SF3a60 also contacted different regions of the U2 snRNA, including the base of stem-loop I and a bulge in stem-loop III. Consistent with it contacting the pre-mRNA branch point adenosine, SF3b14a/p14 interacted with the U2 snRNA near the region that base pairs with the branch point sequence. A comparison of U2 cross-linking patterns obtained with 17S U2 snRNP versus purified spliceosomal A and B complexes revealed that RNA-protein interactions with stem-loop I and the branch site-interacting region of U2 are dynamic. These studies provide important insights into the molecular architecture of 17S U2 snRNPs and reveal U2 snRNP remodeling events during spliceosome assembly.     

A 69-kD protein that associates reversibly with the Sm core domain of several spliceosomal snRNP species

The biogenesis of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4, and U5 involves: (a) migration of the snRNA molecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; (b) assembly of a group of common proteins (Sm proteins) and their binding to a region on the snRNAs called the Sm-binding site; and (c) translocation of the RNP back to the nucleus. A first prerequisite for understanding the assembly pathway and nuclear transport of the snRNPs in more detail is the knowledge of all the snRNP proteins that play essential roles in these processes. We have recently observed a previously undetected 69- kD protein in 12S U1 snRNPs isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts under non-denaturing conditions that is clearly distinct from the U1-70K protein. The following evidence indicates that the 69-kD protein is a common, rather than a U1-specific, protein, possibly associating with the snRNP core particles by protein-protein interaction. (a) Antibodies raised against the 69-kD protein, which did not cross-react with any of the Sm proteins B'-G, precipitated not only U1 snRNPs, but also the other spliceosomal snRNPs U2, U4/U6 and U5, albeit to a lower extent. (b) U1, U2, and U5 core RNP particles reconstituted in vitro contain the 69-kD protein. (c) Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an immunologically related homologue of the human 69-kD protein. When U1 snRNA as well as a mutant U1 snRNA, that can bind the Sm core proteins but lacks the capacity to bind the U1-specific proteins 70K, A, and C, were injected into Xenopus oocytes to allow assembly in vivo, they were recognized by antibodies specific against the 69-kD protein in the ooplasm and in the nucleus. The 69-kD protein is under-represented, if present at all, in purified 17S U2 and in 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs, isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts. Our results are consistent with the working hypothesis that this protein may either play a role in the cytoplasmic assembly of the core domain of the snRNPs and/or in the nuclear transport of the snRNPs. After transport of the snRNPs into the nucleus, it may dissociate from the particles as for example in the case of the 17S U2 or the 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, which bind more than 10 different snRNP specific proteins each in the nucleus.     

Purification of snRNPs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 with 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine-specific antibody and definition of their constituent proteins reacting with anti-Sm and anti-(U1)RNP antisera

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) of the U-snRNP class from Ehrlich ascites tumor cells were purified in a one-step procedure by affinity chromatography with antibodies specific for 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (m23.2.7G), which is part of the 5'-terminal cap structure of snRNAs U1-U5. Antibody-bound snRNPs are desorbed from the affinity column by elution with excess nucleoside m23.2.7G; this guarantees maintenance of their native structure. The snRNPs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 can be recovered quantitatively from nuclear extracts by this procedure. Co-isolation of U6 snRNP must be due to interactions between this and other snRNPs, as anti-m23.2.7G antibodies do not react with deproteinized U6 snRNA. We have so far defined nine proteins of approximate mol. wts. 10 000, 12 000, 13 000, 16 000, 21 000, 28 000, 32 000, 34 000 and 75 000. Purified snRNPs react with anti-(U1)RNP and with anti-Sm antisera from patients with mixed connective tissue disease and from MRL/l mice. As determined by the protein blotting technique, six of the snRNP polypeptides, characterized by apparent mol. wts. 13 000, 16 000, 21 000, 28 000, 34 000 and 75 000, bear antigenic determinants for one or the other of the above autoantibody classes. This suggests strongly that the U-snRNPs produced by the procedure described here are indeed representative of the snRNPs in the cell. With highly purified snRNPs available, investigation of possible enzymic functions of the particles may now be undertaken.     

Biochemical and genetic analyses of the U5, U6, and U4/U6 x U5 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We have purified the yeast U5 and U6 pre-mRNA splicing small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) by affinity chromatography and analyzed the associated polypeptides by mass spectrometry. The yeast U5 snRNP is composed of the two variants of U5 snRNA, six U5-specific proteins and the 7 proteins of the canonical Sm core. The U6 snRNP is composed of the U6 snRNA, Prp24, and the 7 Sm-Like (LSM) proteins. Surprisingly, the yeast DEAD-box helicase-like protein Prp28 is stably associated with the U5 snRNP, yet is absent from the purified U4/U6 x U5 snRNP. A novel yeast U5 and four novel yeast U4/U6 x U5 snRNP polypeptides were characterized by genetic and biochemical means to demonstrate their involvement in the pre-mRNA splicing reaction. We also show that, unlike the human tri-snRNP, the yeast tri-snRNP dissociated upon addition of ATP or dATP.