DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1 are expressed in pancreatic beta-cells

Insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells has to be tightly regulated to ensure accurate glucose homeostasis. The capacity of beta-cells to respond to extracellular stimulation is determined by several signaling pathways. One important feature of these pathways is phosphorylation and subsequent dephosphorylation of a wide range of cellular substrates. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a major eukaryotic serine/threonine protein phosphatase that controls a multitude of physiological processes. We have investigated the expression and cellular distribution of two endogenous inhibitors of PP1 activity in beta-cells. RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry showed that DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1 are present in insulin-secreting endocrine beta-cells. Subcellular fractionation of mouse islets revealed that both PP1 inhibitors predominantly localized to cytosol-enriched fractions. Inhibitor-1 was also present in fractions containing plasma membrane-associated proteins. These data indicate a potential role for DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1 in the regulation of PP1 activity in pancreatic beta-cell stimulus-secretion coupling.     

Inhibitor-1 is not required for the activation of glycogen synthase by insulin in skeletal muscle.

Glycogen synthase is an excellent in vitro substrate for protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), which is potently inhibited by the phosphorylated forms of DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein, M(r) = 32,000) and Inhibitor-1. To test the hypothesis that the activation of glycogen synthase by insulin is due to a decrease in the inhibition of PP1 by the phosphatase inhibitors, we have investigated the effects of insulin on glycogen synthesis in skeletal muscles from wild-type mice and mice lacking Inhibitor-1 and DARPP-32 as a result of targeted disruption of the genes encoding the two proteins. Insulin increased glycogen synthase activity and the synthesis of glycogen to the same extent in wild-type and knockout mice, indicating that neither Inhibitor-1 nor DARPP-32 is required for the full stimulatory effects of insulin on glycogen synthase and glycogen synthesis in skeletal muscle.     

The isolation of novel inhibitory polypeptides of protein phosphatase 1 from bovine thymus nuclei.

Nuclei from bovine thymus contain a high level of partially latent protein phosphatase 1 (PP-1). More than 90% of this PP-1 is associated with the insoluble chromatin/matrix fraction and can be extracted with 0.3 M NaCl. The salt extract also contains three heat- and acid-stable inhibitory proteins of PP-1 that can be resolved on Mono Q. We have purified two of these nuclear inhibitors of PP-1 (NIPP-1a and NIPP-1b) until homogeneity. They are acidic proteins (pI = 4.4) with a molecular mass of 18 kDa (NIPP-1a) and 16 kDa (NIPP-1b) on SDS-PAGE. Judged from the larger molecular mass that was deduced from gel filtration (35 kDa), NIPP-1a and NIPP-1b appear to be asymmetric or dimeric proteins. The nuclear inhibitors totally inhibited the phosphorylase phosphatase activity of PP-1, but even at a 250-fold higher concentration they did not affect the activities of the other major serine/threonine protein phosphatases (PP-2A, PP-2B, and PP-2C). NIPP-1a and NIPP-1b inhibited the catalytic subunit of PP-1 with an extrapolated Ki of about 1 pM, which is some three orders of magnitude better than the cytoplasmic proteins inhibitor 1/DARPP-32 and modulator. The nuclear inhibitors were not inactivated by incubation with protein phosphatases that inactivate inhibitor 1 and DARPP-32. Unlike modulator, they were not able to convert the catalytic subunit of PP-1 into a MgATP-dependent form. Remarkably, the extent of inhibition of PP-1 by NIPP-1b depended on the nature of the substrate. The phosphorylase phosphatase and casein phosphatase activities of PP-1 were completely blocked by NIPP-1b, whereas the dephosphorylation of basic proteins was either not at all inhibited (histone IIA) or only partially (myelin basic protein). These data may indicate that the acidic NIPP-1b is inactivated through complexation by basic proteins. Indeed, nonphosphorylated histone IIA antagonized the inhibitory effect of NIPP-1b on the casein phosphatase activity of PP-1. Our data show that the nucleus contains specific and potent inhibitory proteins of PP-1 that differ from earlier described cytoplasmic inhibitors. We suggest that these novel proteins may control the activity of nuclear PP-1 on its natural substrate(s).     

Na+,K(+)-ATPase phosphorylation in the choroid plexus: synergistic regulation by serotonin/protein kinase C and isoproterenol/cAMP-PK/PP-1 pathways.

BACKGROUND: The ion pump Na+,K(+)-ATPase is responsible for the secretion of cerebrospinal fluid from the choroid plexus. In this tissue, the activity of Na+,K(+)-ATPase is inhibited by serotonin via stimulation of protein kinase C-catalyzed phosphorylation. The choroid plexus is highly enriched in two phosphoproteins which act as regulators of protein phosphatase-1 activity, DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1. Phosphorylation catalyzed by cAMP-dependent protein kinase on a single threonyl residue converts DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1 into potent inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1. Previous work has shown that in the choroid plexus, phosphorylation of DARPP-32 and I-1 is enhanced by isoproterenol and other agents that activate cAMP-PK. We have now examined the possible involvement of the cAMP-PK/protein phosphatase-1 pathway in the regulation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The state of phosphorylation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase was measured by determining the amount of radioactivity incorporated into the ion pump following immunoprecipitation from 32P-prelabeled choroid plexuses incubated with various drugs (see below). Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping was employed to identify the protein kinase involved in the phosphorylation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase. RESULTS: The serotonin-mediated increase in Na+,K(+)-ATPase phosphorylation is potentiated by okadaic acid, an inhibitor of protein phosphatases-1 and -2A, as well as by forskolin or the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, activators of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Two-dimensional phosphopeptide maps suggest that this potentiating action occurs at the level of a protein kinase C phosphorylation site. Forskolin and isoproterenol also stimulate the phosphorylation of DARPP-32 and protein phosphatase inhibitor-1, which in their phosphorylated form are potent inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here support a model in which okadaic acid, forskolin, and isoproterenol achieve their synergistic effects with serotonin through phosphorylation of DARPP-32 and inhibitor-1, inhibition of protein phosphatase-1, and a reduction of dephosphorylation of Na+,K(+)-ATPase at a protein kinase C phosphorylation site.     

DARPP-32, a dopamine- and adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate-regulated neuronal phosphoprotein. I. Amino acid sequence around the phosphorylated threonine

DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr = 32,000) is a major endogenous cytosolic substrate for dopamine- and cyclic AMP-stimulated protein phosphorylation in neurons of the basal ganglia of mammalian brain. It shares many properties with phosphatase inhibitor 1, a substrate for cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, and with G-substrate, a substrate for cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase. We have, therefore, undertaken an analysis of the amino acid sequence around the site at which purified DARPP-32 is phosphorylated by the catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. The results indicate that DARPP-32 is phosphorylated at a single threonine residue contained in the sequence Arg-Arg-Arg-Pro-Thr(P)-Pro-Ala-Met-Leu-Phe-Arg. This sequence was obtained by automated solid phase sequencing of two overlapping tryptic phosphopeptides and one overlapping chymotryptic phosphopeptide which were purified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. A 9-amino acid sequence containing the phosphorylatable threonine residue in DARPP-32 shares 8 identical residues with a sequence containing the phosphorylatable threonine residue in phosphatase inhibitor 1, and shares 5 identical residues with the two identical sequences surrounding the 2 phosphorylatable threonine residues in G-substrate. These observations support the view that DARPP-32, inhibitor 1, and G-substrate are members of a family of regulatory proteins which are involved in the control of protein phosphatase activity by both cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP, but which differ in their cellular and tissue distributions.     

DARPP-32 is required for MAPK/ERK signaling in thyroid cells

Modulation of MAPK signaling duration by cAMP defines its physiological output by driving cells toward proliferation or differentiation. Understanding how the kinetics of MAPK signaling are integrated with other cellular signals is a key issue in development and cancer. Here we show that dopamine and cAMP-regulated neuronal phosphoprotein, 32 kDa (DARPP-32), a protein required for thyroid cell differentiation, determines whether MAPK/ERK activation is sustained or transient. Serum, a stimulus that activates MAPK signaling and does not independently increase DARPP-32 levels results in transient activation of the MAPK pathway. By contrast, TSH + (IGF-I) activate MAPK signaling but also independently increase DARPP-32 levels. Our results are consistent with a model in which maintenance of DARPP-32 expression by TSH + IGF-I leads to sustained MAPK signaling. Moreover, the sensitivity of MAPK/ERK signaling in thyroid cells is lost when de novo DARPP-32 expression is blocked by small interfering RNA. Because both DARPP-32 levels and function as inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1, a key inhibitor of MAPK kinase activity, are governed by cAMP/protein kinase A, the results may explain why in thyroid cells cAMP signaling downstream from TSH controls the duration of MAPK pathway activity. Thus, fine-tuning of DARPP-32 levels leads to changes in the kinetics or sensitivity of MAPK/ERK signaling. Given the implications of MAPK signaling in thyroid cancer and the loss of DARPP-32 in tumor and transformed thyroid cells, DARPP-32 may represent a key therapeutic target.     

Neurotensin regulates DARPP-32 thr34 phosphorylation in neostriatal neurons by activation of dopamine D1-type receptors

Neurotensin modulates dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal system. DARPP-32, a dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of Mr 32 kDa, is phosphorylated on Thr34 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, resulting in its conversion into a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 (PP 1). Here, we examined the effect of neurotensin on DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation using mouse neostriatal slices. Neurotensin stimulated DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation by 4-7-fold with a K(0.5) of approximately 50 nM. The effect of neurotensin was antagonized by a combined neurotensin receptor type-1 (NTR1)/type-2 (NTR2) antagonist, SR142948. It was not antagonized by a NTR1 antagonist, SR48692 or by a NTR2 antagonist, levocabastine; neither was it antagonized by the two combined. Pretreatment with TTX or cobalt abolished the effect of neurotensin. The effect of neurotensin was antagonized by a dopamine D1 antagonist, SCH23390, and by ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists, MK801 and CNQX. These results indicate that neurotensin stimulates the release of dopamine from nigrostriatal presynaptic terminals in an NMDA receptor- and AMPA receptor-dependent manner, leading to the increase in DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation. Neurotensin stimulated the phosphorylation of Ser845 of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit in wild-type mice but not in DARPP-32 knockout mice. Thus, neurotensin, by stimulating the release of dopamine, activates the dopamine D1-receptor/cAMP/PKA/DARPP-32/PP 1 cascade.     

DARPP—32的结构,功能及其调节机制

DARPP-32是一种多巴胺（DA）和cAMP调节的磷蛋白，存在于所有接受DA能投射的神经元中，在中枢神经系统的分布与DAD1受体的分布非常一致。DA通过D1受体使DARPP-32第34位苏氨酸磷酸化，磷酸化DARPP-32成为蛋白磷酸酶1（PP-1）的强效抑制剂，在两个不同位点与PP-1相互作用，从而抑制PP-1活性。DARPP-32／PP-1级联反应在调节，如钙通道、电压依赖性钠通道、Na＋,K＋-ATPase和NMDANR1受体的功能等神经元兴奋性过程中起重要作用。DA对DARPP—32的磷酸化状态有双向调节作用，其他许多神经递质亦可调节其磷酸化状态。     

DARPP-32, a dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated neuronal phosphoprotein. Primary structure and homology with protein phosphatase inhibitor-1

The complete amino acid sequence of bovine brain DARPP-32, a dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated neuronal phosphoprotein, which is a potent and specific inhibitor of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase-1, has been determined. The S-14C-carboxymethylated protein was subjected to enzymatic cleavage by endoproteinase Lys-C, endoproteinase Arg-C, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease, and to chemical cleavage by cyanogen bromide. The overlapping sets of peptides were purified by high performance liquid chromatography and subjected to amino acid sequencing by automated Edman degradation to deduce the complete sequence. The protein consists of a single NH2-terminal blocked polypeptide chain of 202 residues, with a calculated molecular mass of 22,591 daltons, excluding the unidentified NH2-terminal blocking group. This molecular mass is significantly lower than earlier estimates based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or hydrodynamic measurements. The threonine residue that is phosphorylated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (Hemmings, H. C., Jr., Williams, K. R., Konigsberg, W. H., and Greengard, P. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 14486-14490), and that must be phosphorylated for the expression of inhibitory activity, is located at position 34. The molecule contains only 1 cysteine residue and 1 tryptophan residue, at positions 72 and 161, respectively. DARPP-32 is very hydrophilic, and contains a stretch of 16 consecutive acidic residues from position 119 to 134. The predicted secondary structure suggests the presence of 47% alpha-helix, 7% beta-sheet, and 46% random coil, with 11 beta-turns. Comparison of the complete amino acid sequence of bovine DARPP-32 with that of rabbit skeletal muscle protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 revealed a significant amount of sequence identity in the NH2-terminal regions of these two proteins. The active region of inhibitor-1 has been localized to an NH2-terminal fragment (Aitken, A., and Cohen, P. (1982) FEBS Lett. 147, 54-58), the part of the molecule that is most similar to DARPP-32. These data suggest that these two protein phosphatase inhibitors may share a common structural basis for their inhibitory activity and may be related by a common ancestral gene.     

Phosphorylation of DARPP-32, a dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein, by casein kinase II

DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphorprotein, Mr = 32,000 as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) is an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 and is enriched in dopaminoceptive neurons possessing the D1 dopamine receptor. Purified bovine DARPP-32 was phosphorylated in vitro by casein kinase II to a stoichiometry greater than 2 mol of phosphate/mol of protein whereas two structurally and functionally related proteins, protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 and G-substrate, were poor substrates for this enzyme. Sequencing of chymotryptic and thermolytic phosphopeptides from bovine DARPP-32 phosphorylated by casein kinase II suggested that the main phosphorylated residues were Ser45 and Ser102. In the case of rat DARPP-32, the identification of these phosphorylation sites was confirmed by manual Edman degradation. The phosphorylated residues are located NH2-terminal to acidic amino acid residues, a characteristic of casein kinase II phosphorylation sites. Casein kinase II phosphorylated DARPP-32 with an apparent Km value of 3.4 microM and a kcat value of 0.32 s-1. The kcat value for phosphorylation of Ser102 was 5-6 times greater than that for Ser45. Studies employing synthetic peptides encompassing each phosphorylation site confirmed this difference between the kcat values for phosphorylation of the two sites. In slices of rat caudate-putamen prelabeled with [32P]phosphate, DARPP-32 was phosphorylated on seryl residues under basal conditions. Comparison of thermolytic phosphopeptide maps and determination of the phosphorylated residue by manual Edman degradation identified the main phosphorylation site in intact cells as Ser102. In vitro, DARPP-32 phosphorylated by casein kinase II was dephosphorylated by protein phosphatases-1 and -2A. Phosphorylation by casein kinase II did not affect the potency of DARPP-32 as an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1, which depended only on phosphorylation of Thr34 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. However, phosphorylation of DARPP-32 by casein kinase II facilitated phosphorylation of Thr34 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase with a 2.2-fold increase in the Vmax and a 1.4-fold increase in the apparent Km. Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 by casein kinase II in intact cells may therefore modulate its phosphorylation in response to increased levels of cAMP.     

DARPP-32 and Phosphatase Inhibitor-1, Two Structurally Related Inhibitors of Protein Phosphatase-1, Are Both Present in Striatonigral Neurons

DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein of Mr = 32,000) and phosphatase inhibitor-1, two previously characterized inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1, were identified in both the neostriatum and the substantia nigra. Phosphatase inhibitor-1 was partially purified from bovine caudate nucleus and found to be distinct from DARPP-32 in some of its biochemical properties. The neuronal localization of DARPP-32 and phosphatase inhibitor-1 within the rat neostriatum and substantia nigra was investigated by studying the effects of kainic acid. Injection into the neostriatum of kainic acid, which destroys striatonigral neurons and striatonigral fibers, decreased the amounts of DARPP-32 and phosphatase inhibitor-1 to the same extent, both in the lesioned neostriatum and in the ipsilateral substantia nigra. The specific activity of protein phosphatase-1 in the neostriatum was unaffected by kainic acid. The results indicate that, in rat brain, DARPP-32 and phosphatase inhibitor-1 are both present in striatal neurons and in striatonigral fibers, and that they probably coexist in at least a subpopulation of striatonigral neurons. In contrast, protein phosphatase-1 does not appear to be enriched in any specific neuronal subpopulation in the neostriatum.     

Characterization of the inhibition of protein phosphatase-1 by DARPP-32 and inhibitor-2

Phospho-DARPP-32 (where DARPP-32 is dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr 32,000), its homolog, phospho-inhibitor-1, and inhibitor-2 are potent inhibitors (IC50 approximately 1 nM) of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1). Our previous studies have indicated that a region encompassing residues 6-11 (RKKIQF) and phospho-Thr-34, of phospho-DARPP-32, interacts with PP1. However, little is known about specific regions of inhibitor-2 that interact with PP1. We have now characterized in detail the interaction of phospho-DARPP-32 and inhibitor-2 with PP1. Mutagenesis studies indicate that within DARPP-32 Phe-11 and Ile-9 play critical roles, with Lys-7 playing a lesser role in inhibition of PP1. Pro-33 and Pro-35 are also important, as is the number of amino acids between residues 7 and 11 and phospho-Thr-34. For inhibitor-2, deletion of amino acids 1-8 (I2-(9-204)) or 100-204 (I2-(1-99)) had little effect on the ability of the mutant proteins to inhibit PP1. Further deletion of residues 9-13 (I2-(14-204)) resulted in a large decrease in inhibitory potency (IC50 approximately 800 nM), whereas further COOH-terminal deletion (I2-(1-84)) caused a moderate decrease in inhibitory potency (IC50 approximately 10 nM). Within residues 9-13 (PIKGI), mutagenesis indicated that Ile-10, Lys-11, and Ile-13 play critical roles. The peptide I2-(6-20) antagonized the inhibition of PP-1 by inhibitor-2 but had no effect on inhibition by phospho-DARPP-32. In contrast, the peptide D32-(6-38) antagonized the inhibition of PP1 by phospho-DARPP-32, inhibitor-2, and I2-(1-120) but not I2-(85-204). These results indicate that distinct amino acid motifs contained within the NH2 termini of phospho-DARPP-32 (KKIQF, where italics indicate important residues) and inhibitor-2 (IKGI) are critical for inhibition of PP1. Moreover, residues 14-84 of inhibitor-2 and residues 6-38 of phospho-DARPP-32 share elements that are important for interaction with PP1.     

Role of calcineurin and protein phosphatase-2A in the regulation of DARPP-32 dephosphorylation in neostriatal neurons

DARPP-32, a dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein of Mr 32 kDa, is phosphorylated on Thr34 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, resulting in its conversion to a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1). Conversely, Thr34-phosphorylated DARPP-32 is dephosphorylated and inactivated in vitro by calcineurin and protein phosphatase-2A (PP-2A). We have investigated the relative contributions of these protein phosphatases to the regulation of DARPP-32 dephosphorylation in mouse neostriatal slices. Cyclosporin A (5 microM), a calcineurin inhibitor, maximally increased the level of phosphorylated DARPP-32 by 17+/-2-fold. Okadaic acid (1 microM), an inhibitor of PP-1 and PP-2A, had a smaller effect, increasing phospho-DARPP-32 by 5.1+/-1.3-fold. The effect of okadaic acid on DARPP-32 phosphorylation was shown to be due to inhibition of PP-2A activity. Incubation of slices in the presence of cyclosporin A plus either okadaic acid or calyculin A, another PP-1/PP-2A inhibitor, caused a synergistic increase in the level of phosphorylated DARPP-32. The use of Ca2(+)-free/EGTA medium mimicked the effects of cyclosporin A on DARPP-32 phosphorylation, supporting the conclusion that the action of cyclosporin on DARPP-32 phosphorylation was attributable to blockade of the Ca2(+)-dependent activation of calcineurin. The results indicate that calcineurin and PP-2A, but not PP-1, act synergistically to maintain a low level of phosphorylated DARPP-32 in neostriatal slices.     

Inhibition of serine-threonine protein phosphatases decreases barrier function of rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells

The flux of multisized fluorescein-isothiocyanate-labeled hydroxy ethyl starch (FITC-HES) macromolecules was used to assess changes in barrier function of rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell (RPMVEC) monolayers exposed to protein phosphatase (PP) inhibitors or cGMP analogs and atriopeptin (ANF). Two potent PP inhibitors, calyculin A (CalA) and okadaic acid (OA), increased RPMVEC permeability in a dose- and time-dependent manner, and CalA had a higher intrinsic activity than OA. In contrast, ANF and potent cGMP analogs had no effect on basal RPMVEC permeability. The phosphohistone PP activity contained in RPMVEC sonicates was inhibited by OA with an inhibition profile that suggested at least two components were present, with PP2A accounting for ∼70% of the OA-inhibitable phosphohistone phosphatase activity. Following separation with heparin-Sepharose chromatography, PP activity exhibited equipotent inhibition by CalA and differential inhibition by OA. Differential inhibition of PP1 and PP2A by OA suggested that PP1 is involved in regulating RPMVEC barrier function. Permeabilized RPMVEC showed increased phosphorylation of several proteins in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. Treatment with KT 5926, a myosin light chain (MLC) kinase (MLCK) inhibitor, or rolipram, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, decreased ³²P incorporation into immunoprecipitated MLC by CalA and OA. However, this effect did not abolish either the CalA- or OA-induced decrease in the RPMVEC barrier function. Localization of filamentous (F) actin was at the periphery as well as in the cytoplasm and perinuclear region, whereas nonmuscle myosin was seen in the perinuclear region. Neither of these patterns was changed in the presence of CalA. Thus, cGMP does not alter RPMVEC permeability, but inhibition of PP activity results in loss of barrier function by a mechanism independent from MLC phosphorylation. J. Cell. Physiol. 171:259–270, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

PP1, PKA and DARPP-32 in breast cancer: A retrospective assessment of protein and mRNA expression

Cyclic AMP–dependent protein kinase A (PKA) and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) are proteins involved in numerous essential signalling pathways that modulate physiological and pathological functions. Both PP1 and PKA can be inhibited by dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein 32 kD (DARPP-32). Using immunohistochemistry, PKA and PP1 expression was determined in a large primary breast tumour cohort to evaluate associations between clinical outcome and clinicopathological criteria (n > 1100). In addition, mRNA expression of PKA and PP1 subunits was assessed in the METABRIC data set (n = 1980). Low protein expression of PKA was significantly associated with adverse survival of breast cancer patients; interestingly, this relationship was stronger in ER-positive breast cancer patients. PP1 protein expression was not associated with patient survival. PKA and PP1 subunit mRNA was also assessed; PPP1CA, PRKACG and PRKAR1B were associated with breast cancer–specific survival. In patients with high expression of DARPP-32, low expression of PP1 was associated with adverse survival when compared to high expression in the same group. PKA expression and PP1 expression are of significant interest in cancer as they are involved in a wide array of cellular processes, and these data indicate PKA and PP1 may play an important role in patient outcome.     

Protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 (PPI-1) has protective activities in stress conditions in E. coli

Protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 (PPI-1) is a major inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which regulates signal transduction in many eukaryotic cellular processes. Biophysical studies have shown that PPI-1 has a large Stokes radius and is heat stable, suggesting that it lacks extensive secondary structures. The unfolded structure of PPI-1 may enable it to interact with many proteins or ligands during stress conditions. Here we show that PPI-1 can act as a protective molecule, inhibiting protein aggregation and guarding E. coli cells against various stresses. Therefore, PPI-1 seems to have a physiological function as a protective molecule as well as regulator of protein serine/threonine phosphatases.     

Inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1. Inhibitor-1 of bovine adipose tissue and a dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of bovine brain are identical

Protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 was purified from bovine adipose tissue. The protein had an apparent molecular mass of 32 kDa by SDS/PAGE and a Stokes' radius of 3.4 nm. It was phosphorylated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase on a threonyl residue; this phosphorylation was necessary for inhibition of protein phosphatase-1. Bovine adipose tissue inhibitor-1 was compared directly with rabbit skeletal muscle inhibitor-1 and with a 32000-Mr, dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein from bovine brain (DARPP-32), also an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1. By the following biochemical and immunochemical criteria, bovine adipose tissue inhibitor-1 was found to be very similar and possibly identical to DARPP-32 and was clearly distinct from skeletal muscle inhibitor-1: molecular mass by SDS/PAGE; Stokes' radii; phosphorylation on threonine residues; Staphylococcus-aureus-V8-protease-generated peptide patterns analyzed by SDS/PAGE; tryptic phosphopeptide maps analysed by two-dimensional thin-layer electrophoresis/chromatography; elution on reverse-phase HPLC; chymotryptic peptide maps as analysed by reverse-phase HPLC; amino acid composition; antibody recognition by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting; effect of cyanogen bromide cleavage on protein phosphatase inhibitor activity. Based on these results we conclude that bovine brain and adipose tissue contain an identical phosphoprotein inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 (DARPP-32), which is distinct from that of skeletal muscle (inhibitor-1).     

Importance of the beta12-beta13 loop in protein phosphatase-1 catalytic subunit for inhibition by toxins and mammalian protein inhibitors.

Type-1 protein serine/threonine phosphatases (PP1) are uniquely inhibited by the mammalian proteins, inhibitor-1 (I-1), inhibitor-2 (I-2), and nuclear inhibitor of PP1 (NIPP-1). In addition, several natural compounds inhibit both PP1 and the type-2 phosphatase, PP2A. Deletion of C-terminal sequences that included the beta12-beta13 loop attenuated the inhibition of the resulting PP1alpha catalytic core by I-1, I-2, NIPP-1, and several toxins, including tautomycin, microcystin-LR, calyculin A, and okadaic acid. Substitution of C-terminal sequences from the PP2A catalytic subunit produced a chimeric enzyme, CRHM2, that was inhibited by toxins with dose-response characteristics of PP1 and not PP2A. However, CRHM2 was insensitive to the PP1-specific inhibitors, I-1, I-2, and NIPP-1. The anticancer compound, fostriecin, differed from other phosphatase inhibitors in that it inhibited wild-type PP1alpha, the PP1alpha catalytic core, and CRHM2 with identical IC(50). Binding of wild-type and mutant phosphatases to immobilized microcystin-LR, NIPP-1, and I-2 established that the beta12-beta13 loop was essential for the association of PP1 with toxins and the protein inhibitors. These studies point to the importance of the beta12-beta13 loop structure and conformation for the control of PP1 functions by toxins and endogenous proteins.     

Association of protein phosphatase 1 gamma 1 with spinophilin suppresses phosphatase activity in a Parkinson disease model

Sustained nigrostriatal dopamine depletion increases the serine/threonine phosphorylation of multiple striatal proteins that play a role in corticostriatal synaptic plasticity, including Thr(286) phosphorylation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIalpha (CaMKIIalpha). Mechanisms underlying these changes are unclear, but protein phosphatases play a critical role in the acute modulation of striatal protein phosphorylation. Here we show that dopamine depletion for periods ranging from 3 weeks to 10 months significantly reduces the total activity of protein phosphatase (PP) 1, but not of PP2A, in whole lysates of rat striatum, as measured using multiple substrates, including Thr(286)-autophosphorylated CaMKIIalpha. Striatal PP1 activity is partially inhibited by a fragment of the PP1-binding protein neurabin-I, Nb-(146-493), because of the selective inhibition of the PP1gamma(1) isoform. The fraction of PP1 activity that is insensitive to Nb-(146-493) was unaffected by dopamine depletion, demonstrating that dopamine depletion specifically reduces the activity of PP1 isoforms that are sensitive to Nb-(146-493) (i.e. PP1gamma(1)). However, total striatal levels of PP1gamma(1) or any other PP1 isoform were unaffected by dopamine depletion, and our previous studies showed that total levels of the PP1 regulatory/targeting proteins DARPP-32, spinophilin, and neurabin were also unchanged. Rather, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that dopamine depletion increases the association of PP1gamma(1) with spinophilin in striatal extracts. In combination, these data demonstrate that striatal dopamine depletion inhibits a specific synaptic phosphatase by increasing PP1gamma(1) interaction with spinophilin, perhaps contributing to hyperphosphorylation of synaptic proteins and disruptions of synaptic plasticity and/or dendritic morphology.     

The evolutionary strata of DARPP-32 tail implicates hierarchical functional expansion in higher vertebrates

DARPP-32 (dopamine and adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa), which belongs to PPP1R1 gene family, is known to act as an important integrator in dopamine-mediated neurotransmission via the inhibition of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1). Besides its neuronal roles, this protein also behaves as a key player in pathological and pharmacological aspects. Use of bioinformatics and phylogenetics approaches to further characterize the molecular features of DARPP-32 can guide future works. Predicted phosphorylation sites on DARPP-32 show conservation across vertebrates. Phylogenetics analysis indicates evolutionary strata of phosphorylation site acquisition at the C-terminus, suggesting functional expansion of DARPP-32, where more diverse signalling cues may involve in regulating DARPP-32 in inhibiting PP1 activity. Moreover, both phylogenetics and synteny analyses suggest de novo origination of PPP1R1 gene family via chromosomal rearrangement and exonization.