A response to Dodds and Jones

In response to "Surrogacy and Autonomy," by Susan Dodds and Karen Jones in this issue of Bioethics, the author concedes that only a surrogacy practice stringently regulated by good counseling, escape clauses for pregnant women, and the prohibition of profit-making agencies will save women from exploitation, but she objects to singling out women for paternalistic "protection against themselves," and to defending women's autonomy to the extent of their right to behave in ways known to harm a fetus. Dodds and Jones' concerns about attitudes toward women, genetic bias, the concept of children as property, and the harm principle generated by surrogacy contracts are answered with arguments for why surrogacy should not be illegal.     

A response to Purdy

The authors respond to Laura Purdy's article, "Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?," in the same issue of Bioethics. They contend that focusing on what is necessarily wrong with surrogate motherhood contracts allows Purdy to overlook the contingent features of classist, patriarchal society that make such contracts morally wrong and to marginalize feminist concerns. Theoretical fallacies within Purdy's consequentialist framework create too individualistic and narrow a discussion of the possible harms of surrogate contracts, ignoring influences upon women as a group and the psychological risks to the surrogate mother. If surrogacy contracts have the potential to empower women, then we must see some specific changes that would make this a reality, given that Purdy does not mean surrogacy as it is currently practised.     

Electrokinetic response of granulocytes to concanavalin A and succinyl-concanavalin A

Electrophoretic light scattering has been used to study the effects of concanavalin A (Con A) and succinyl-Con A on the electrophoretic mobility distribution of resident guinea-pig peritoneal eosinophils and human peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes. In both cell types, incubation with Con A (a tetrameric lectin) decreases slightly the mean mobility and increases substantially the width of the electrophoretic mobility distribution. These effects can be abolished by alpha-methyl-D-mannoside, a hapten sugar of Con A. Succinyl Con A, a dimeric derivative, was found to have no effect on the mobility distribution. These results are strikingly similar to our previous report of the response of the resident guinea-pig macrophage (19), suggesting possible parallels in the endocytic mechanisms of these cell types.     

A Src-astic response to mounting tension.

The nerve growth cone binds to a complex array of guidance cues in its local environment that influence cytoskeletal interactions to control the direction of subsequent axon outgrowth. How this occurs is a critical question and must certainly involve signal transduction pathways. The paper by Suter and Forscher (2001)(this issue) begins to address how one such pathway, an Src family tyrosine kinase, enhances cytoskeletal linkage to apCAM, a permissive extracellular cue for Aplysia growth cones. Interestingly, they show that applied tension increases this kinase's localized phosphorylation that in turn further strengthens linkage. This suggests a potential positive feedback mechanism for amplifying and discriminating guidance information to guide growth cone motility.     

谷氨酸钠兴奋室旁核引起的升压效应及其与蓝斑...

In urethane-anesthetized, tubocurarine-immobilized and artificially ventilated rats, microinjection of L-glutamate (Glu) into hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (NPV) or locus coeruleus (LC) induced a pressor response. The LC-pressor response could be attenuated by preinjection of phentolamine or propranolol into bilateral NPV; Preinjection of phentolamine or bicuculline into bilateral NPV could also attenuate the depressor effect of A1-excitation by Glu, but preinjection of propranolol had no such effect; suggesting that the LC-pressor or A1-depressor effect is mediated partly by NPV, and GABAergic inhibitory interneurons in NPV may be involved in A1-depressor response.     

Cladistics and the land plants: A response to Robinson

The reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships should be based not on belief but on an explicit and logical analysis of all available characters. Hennigian phylogenetic systematics (cladistics) provides a framework for evaluating putative homologies characterizing particular hierarchical levels, determining relationships of taxa sharing congruent patterns of homologies, and constructing a classification based on this information. Fossils can and should be included in the analysis if enough of the relevant characters are preserved; this is not currently possible for early land plants because of the fragmentary fossil record. To avoid circularity, adaptive and functional considerations should be addressed only after a phylogenetic hypothesis based on patterns on patterns of shared homologies is available.