Cooperative Assembly of a Protein-DNA Filament for Nonhomologous End Joining

Nonhomologous end joining repairs DNA double-strand breaks created by ionizing radiation and V(D)J recombination. Ku, XRCC4/Ligase IV (XL), and XLF have a remarkable mismatched end (MEnd) ligase activity, particularly for ends with mismatched 3′ overhangs, but the mechanism has remained obscure. Here, we showed XL required Ku to bind DNA, whereas XLF required both Ku and XL to bind DNA. We detected cooperative assembly of one or two Ku molecules and up to five molecules each of XL and XLF into a Ku-XL-XLF-DNA (MEnd ligase-DNA) complex. XLF mutations that disrupted its interactions with XRCC4 or DNA also disrupted complex assembly and end joining. Together with published co-crystal structures of truncated XRCC4 and XLF proteins, our data with full-length Ku, XL, and XLF bound to DNA indicate assembly of a filament containing Ku plus alternating XL and XLF molecules. By contrast, in the absence of XLF, we detected cooperative assembly of up to six molecules each of Ku and XL into a Ku-XL-DNA complex, consistent with a filament containing alternating Ku and XL molecules. Despite a lower molecular mass, MEnd ligase-DNA had a lower electrophoretic mobility than Ku-XL-DNA. The anomalous difference in mobility and difference in XL to Ku molar ratio suggests that MEnd ligase-DNA has a distinct structure that successfully aligns mismatched DNA ends for ligation.     

Exonuclease Function of Human Mre11 Promotes Deletional Nonhomologous End Joining

DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are lethal if not repaired and are highly mutagenic if misrepaired. Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of the major DSB repair pathways and can rejoin the DSB ends either precisely or with mistakes. Recent evidence suggests the existence of two NHEJ subpathways: conservative NHEJ (C-NHEJ), which does not require microhomology and can join ends precisely; and deletional NHEJ (D-NHEJ), which utilizes microhomology to join the ends with small deletions. Little is known about how these NHEJ subpathways are regulated. Mre11 has been implicated in DNA damage response, thus we investigated whether Mre11 function also extended to NHEJ. We utilized an intrachromosomal NHEJ substrate in which DSBs are generated by the I-SceI to address this question. The cohesive ends are fully complementary and were either repaired by C-NHEJ or D-NHEJ with similar efficiency. We found that disruption of Mre11 by RNA interference in human cells led to a 10-fold decrease in the frequency of D-NHEJ compared with cells with functional Mre11. Interestingly, C-NHEJ was not affected by Mre11 status. Expression of wild type but not exonuclease-defective Mre11 mutants was able to rescue D-NHEJ in Mre11-deficient cells. Further mutational analysis suggested that additional mechanisms associated with methylation of Mre11 at the C-terminal glycine–arginine-rich domain contributed to the promotion of D-NHEJ by Mre11. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms by which Mre11 affects the accuracy of DSB end joining specifically through control of the D-NHEJ subpathway, thus illustrating the complexity of the Mre11 role in maintaining genomic stability.DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs)³ can be produced in physiological and genotoxic processes. Improper repair or failure to repair DSBs can lead to gene deletions, duplications, translocations, and missegregation of large chromosome fragments, which may result in gene dosage imbalance, cancer development, or cell death (1–3). Historically, two distinct pathways have been described which ensure that DSBs are repaired: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). During HR, the damaged chromosome interacts via synapsis with an undamaged DNA molecule with which it shares extensive sequence homology, usually its sister chromatid (4, 5). HR is most active in the late S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle. In contrast, NHEJ is active throughout the cell cycle and requires little or no DNA homology during repair; thus, it is traditionally considered an error-prone repair pathway (6, 7). However, accumulating evidence from recent studies suggests that there exists an error-free NHEJ subpathway (8, 9).Two types of end-joining reactions can be defined operationally. The first one, which may be called conservative NHEJ (C-NHEJ), is characterized by the precise joining of short, overhanging, complementary ends. Proteins including Ku70/Ku80 and XRCC4 (10–12) are associated with this highly efficient pathway, whereby most ends are rejoined successfully without any alteration of the DNA sequence (8). The alternative pathway for NHEJ is the highly mutagenic and deletional NHEJ (D-NHEJ), which results in short deletions after use of imperfect microhomology of about 1–10 bp at the repair junctions. D-NHEJ activity has been demonstrated in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, D-NHEJ is independent of Rad52, Rad1, or Ku80 but depends on Mre11 in yeast (13, 14). However, the genetic determinants of this subpathway have not been well established in mammalian cells.Mre11 is the core subunit of the Mre11·Rad50·Nbs1 complex (called the MRN complex), which is conserved throughout all kingdoms of life. The MRN complex is a central player in most aspects of the cellular response to DSBs, including HR, NHEJ, telomere maintenance, and DNA damage checkpoints (15–17). Loss of Mre11 results in increased radiosensitivity and chromosomal instability (17). Patients with germ line mutations of Mre11 have clinical presentations similar to those of ataxia telangiectasia patients (ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder) (18).After DNA damage, the MRN complex is recruited to the sites of damage via zinc hooks at the ends of the long, flexible arms of Rad50 (19, 20). Mre11 contains both single-stranded DNA endonuclease and 3′-5′ exonuclease activities in vitro, but in vivo Mre11 is also implicated in 5′-3′ DSB resection. The MRN complex also interacts with BRCA1 and CtIP, which may be essential for DSB end resection to generate 3′ overhanging single-stranded DNA during initiation of HR (21, 22).Mre11 has an N-terminal nuclease domain, which contains five phosphoesterase motifs, and a C-terminal glycine–arginine-rich domain (GAR). Arthur et al. (23) showed that an H85L mutation completely abrogated exonuclease activity, whereas binding to Rad50 and Nbs1 was retained. Complementation of ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder cells with this mutant, called Mre11-3, restored the localization of the MRN complex to DSBs in IR-induced foci (23, 24). Methylation of the GAR region has also been shown to be important for the DNA binding and exonuclease activity of Mre11 in vitro (25, 26). Both the crystal structure of yeast Mre11 and data from conditional knock-out mice (Mre11^H129N/Δ) reveal that the nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for HR repair of DSBs (22, 27). However, the role of Mre11 in NHEJ is not well defined (27, 28). Most recently, Mre11 was reported to support NHEJ in mammalian cell (29–31). However, whether Mre11 regulates both NHEJ subpathways or only D-NHEJ is controversial, and the mechanisms by which Mre11 is involved in NHEJ remain to be established.To address these questions, we have established a system that can analyze the accuracy and efficiency of rejoining of two adjacent DSB ends at chromosomal level in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. We show here that Mre11 siRNA knockdown in these cells results in significant reduction of the overall NHEJ efficiency. Upon sequencing the repair junctions, we found that Mre11 siRNA knockdown suppressed D-NHEJ by ∼10-fold, reflected by a reduction of small deletions in the repair junction, but it had no effect on the efficiency of C-NHEJ. Mutation of Mre11 in either the phosphoesterase domain (Mre11-3) or the GAR region (Mre11-R/A) to produce abnormal exonuclease activity impaired the D-NHEJ pathway only. The D-NHEJ deficiency is significantly more severe in cells with Mre11-R/A than that in cells with Mre11-3. Therefore, our data suggest that Mre11 is required specifically for D-NHEJ repair of DNA DSBs and that its exonuclease activity is at least one of the important mechanisms for this DNA end joining subpathway.     

Nonhomologous End Joining during Restriction Enzyme-Mediated DNA Integration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The BamHI restriction enzyme mediates integration of nonhomologous DNA into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome (R. H. Schiestl and T. D. Petes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7585–7589, 1991). The present study investigates the mechanism of such events: in particular, the mediating activity of various restriction enzymes and the processing of resultant fragment ends. Our results show that in addition to BamHI, BglII and KpnI increase DNA integration efficiencies severalfold, while Asp718, HindIII, EcoRI, SalI, SmaI, HpaI, MscI, and SnaBI do not. Secondly, the three active enzymes stimulated integrations only of fragments containing 5′ or 3′ overhangs but not of blunt-ended fragments. Thirdly, integrations mediated by one enzyme and utilizing a substrate created by another required at least 2 bp of homology. Furthermore, an Asp718 fragment possessing a 5′ overhang integrated into a KpnI (isoschizomer) site possessing a 3′ overhang, most likely by filling of the 5′ overhang followed by 5′ exonuclease digestion to produce a 3′ end. We classified and analyzed the restriction enzyme-mediated integration events in the context of their genomic positions. The majority of events integrated into single sites. In the remaining 6 of 19 cases each end of the plasmid inserted into a different sequence, producing rearrangements such as duplications, deletions, and translocations.DNA double-strand breaks occur either as a result of assaults by external agents or spontaneously during DNA metabolism, repair, or replication. Double-strand breaks may cause genome rearrangements, such as deletions, duplications, and translocations, which have been implicated in carcinogenesis. For any cell, double-strand break repair is essential, since these cytotoxic DNA lesions may cause potentially lethal losses of chromosomes. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA repair enzymes encoded by genes belonging to the RAD52 epistasis group repair double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. This process requires homologous DNA sequences, usually present on sister chromatids and on homologous chromosomes in diploids. In mammalian cells, however, the majority of double-strand breaks are repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (32). This event in S. cerevisiae occurs either in rad52 mutants in the presence of homology (18) or in the wild type in the absence of homology (26, 36). Joining reactions of restriction enzyme-produced DNA ends have frequently been used to study NHEJ both in vivo and in vitro. NHEJ of substrates with defined terminal configurations produced by different enzyme digestions were studied in vitro in the presence of Xenopus laevis extracts (2, 30, 43) and in vivo in mammalian cells (32) and fission yeast cells (12). In S. cerevisiae, illegitimate repair of a double-strand break in a plasmid was studied by Mezard and Nicolas (25) and the repair of double-strand breaks produced by an inducible HO endonuclease in the absence of homology was studied by Moore and Haber (26) (for the conclusions of those studies see Discussion).Schiestl and Petes (36) studied illegitimate integration events by transforming a BamHI URA3 fragment into yeast cells lacking homology to the transforming DNA (in a ura3 deletion mutant), so that integration into the genome was by illegitimate recombination. With BamHI in the transformation mixture, the URA3 fragment integrated into genomic BamHI sites and the frequency of integration increased sixfold (36). These experiments suggest that the BamHI restriction enzyme can cut chromosomal DNA in vivo and thus mediate integration of the transforming DNA into that site. Subsequently, restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI) has been used in a variety of organisms for insertional mutagenesis. For example, Kuspa and Loomis (20) first adapted this technology to Dictyostelium discoideum, where previously cloning of developmental genes by complementation of mutant phenotypes was not feasible. Application of REMI has led to construction of REMI-restriction fragment length polymorphism maps (19, 23) and the cloning of most developmental genes in Dictyostelium. REMI has also been adapted successfully to the ascomycete Cochliobolus heterostrophus (24) and the maize pathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis (3) to tag genes by insertional mutagenesis.Here we find that enzymes vary in their ability to mediate integration into the yeast genome. Furthermore, we present model mechanisms based on the products created from various blunt 5′ protruding single strand (PSS) and 3′ PSS joining combinations.     

Impaired Resection of Meiotic Double-Strand Breaks Channels Repair to Nonhomologous End Joining in Caenorhabditis elegans

Repair of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) by the homologous recombination (HR) pathway results in crossovers (COs) required for a successful first meiotic division. Mre11 is one member of the MRX/N (Mre11, Rad50, and Xrs2/Nbs1) complex required for meiotic DSB formation and for resection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Caenorhabditis elegans, evidence for the MRX/N role in DSB resection is limited. We report the first separation-of-function allele, mre-11(iow1) in C. elegans, which is specifically defective in meiotic DSB resection but not in formation. The mre-11(iow1) mutants displayed chromosomal fragmentation and aggregation in late prophase I. Recombination intermediates and crossover formation was greatly reduced in mre-11(iow1) mutants. Irradiation-induced DSBs during meiosis failed to be repaired from early to middle prophase I in mre-11(iow1) mutants. In the absence of a functional HR, our data suggest that some DSBs in mre-11(iow1) mutants are repaired by the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, as removing NHEJ partially suppressed the meiotic defects shown by mre-11(iow1). In the absence of NHEJ and a functional MRX/N, meiotic DSBs are channeled to EXO-1-dependent HR repair. Overall, our analysis supports a role for MRE-11 in the resection of DSBs in middle meiotic prophase I and in blocking NHEJ.     

The Exonuclease Homolog OsRAD1 Promotes Accurate Meiotic Double-Strand Break Repair by Suppressing Nonhomologous End Joining

During meiosis, programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generated to initiate homologous recombination, which is crucial for faithful chromosome segregation. In yeast, Radiation sensitive1 (RAD1) acts together with Radiation sensitive9 (RAD9) and Hydroxyurea sensitive1 (HUS1) to facilitate meiotic recombination via cell-cycle checkpoint control. However, little is known about the meiotic functions of these proteins in higher eukaryotes. Here, we characterized a RAD1 homolog in rice (Oryza sativa) and obtained evidence that O. sativa RAD1 (OsRAD1) is important for meiotic DSB repair. Loss of OsRAD1 led to abnormal chromosome association and fragmentation upon completion of homologous pairing and synapsis. These aberrant chromosome associations were independent of OsDMC1. We found that classical nonhomologous end-joining mediated by Ku70 accounted for most of the ectopic associations in Osrad1. In addition, OsRAD1 interacts directly with OsHUS1 and OsRAD9, suggesting that these proteins act as a complex to promote DSB repair during rice meiosis. Together, these findings suggest that the 9-1-1 complex facilitates accurate meiotic recombination by suppressing nonhomologous end-joining during meiosis in rice.Meiosis comprises two successive cell divisions after a single S phase, generating four haploid products. To ensure proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division, crossovers (COs) are formed between homologous chromosomes (Kleckner, 2006). CO formation requires faithful repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced by the protein SPO11 (Keeney et al., 1997; Shinohara et al., 1997).Mitotic cells employ two basic strategies for DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and classical nonhomologous end-joining (C-NHEJ; Deriano and Roth, 2013). HR requires an undamaged template sequence for repair, while the C-NHEJ pathway involves direct ligation of the broken ends in a Ku-dependent manner. Both HR and C-NHEJ safeguard genome integrity during mitosis (Ceccaldi et al., 2016; Symington and Gautier, 2011). However, DSBs are preferentially repaired by HR during meiosis, because only this pathway generates COs. C-NHEJ competes with HR and creates de novo mutations in the gametes, indicating that this activity should be restricted during meiotic DSB repair. Previous studies have identified several factors essential for preventing C-NHEJ in meiosis (Goedecke et al., 1999; Martin et al., 2005; Adamo et al., 2010; Lemmens et al., 2013).Although the mechanism inhibiting C-NHEJ during meiosis is still elusive, regulators guaranteeing the success of the HR pathway have been extensively studied. Radiation sensitive1 (RAD1) is an evolutionarily conserved protein whose best-known function is checkpoint signaling. RAD1, a member of the ring-shaped RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9-1-1) complex, plays a crucial role in activating the pachytene checkpoint, a surveillance mechanism for monitoring the progression of meiotic HR in many organisms (Lydall et al., 1996; Hong and Roeder, 2002; Eichinger and Jentsch, 2010).In addition to their well-known roles in checkpoint signaling, members of 9-1-1 complex may also play a direct role in facilitating DSB repair and HR during meiosis. RAD1 is associated with both synapsed and unsynapsed chromosomes during prophase I in mouse (Freire et al., 1998). The homolog of RAD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is Rad17, and rad17 mutant exhibits persistent Rad51 foci (Shinohara et al., 2003). Moreover, mutations in Rad17 lead to a reduced frequency of interhomolog recombination, aberrant synapsis, increased rates of ectopic recombination events, and illegitimate repair from the sister chromatids during meiosis (Grushcow et al., 1999). Recently, Rad17 was shown to be necessary for the efficient assembly of ZMM proteins (Shinohara et al., 2015). Apart from RAD1, the other partners of 9-1-1 were also shown to be involved in DSB repair. HUS1 is proved essential for meiotic DSB repair in Drosophila (Peretz et al., 2009). Moreover, Hus1 inactivation in mouse testicular germ cells results in persistent meiotic DNA damage, chromosomal defects, and germ cell depletion (Lyndaker et al., 2013). Nevertheless, little is known about the role of 9-1-1 proteins in higher plants. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutants of RAD9 show increased sensitivity to genotoxic agents and delayed general repair of mitotic DSBs (Heitzeberg et al., 2004). A recent study indicates that HUS1 is involved in DSB repair of both mitotic and meiotic cells in rice (Che et al., 2014).In this study, we showed that OsRAD1 was required for the accurate repair of DSBs in rice during meiosis. Importantly, we demonstrated that the defective meiotic DSB repair in the Osrad1 mutants could be partially suppressed by blocking the C-NHEJ pathway. We also investigated the relationship between OsRAD1 and other key recombination proteins. Together, our findings indicated that the 9-1-1 complex plays a crucial role in the meiotic DSB repair mechanism.     

Spindle Checkpoint Factors Bub1 and Bub2 Promote DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by Nonhomologous End Joining

The nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway is essential for the preservation of genome integrity, as it efficiently repairs DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Previous biochemical and genetic investigations have indicated that, despite the importance of this pathway, the entire complement of genes regulating NHEJ remains unknown. To address this, we employed a plasmid-based NHEJ DNA repair screen in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) using 369 putative nonessential DNA repair-related components as queries. Among the newly identified genes associated with NHEJ deficiency upon disruption are two spindle assembly checkpoint kinases, Bub1 and Bub2. Both observation of resulting phenotypes and chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that Bub1 and -2, either alone or in combination with cell cycle regulators, are recruited near the DSB, where phosphorylated Rad53 or H2A accumulates. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Bub kinases phosphorylated in response to DNA damage identified previously unknown kinase substrates on Tel1 S/T-Q sites. Moreover, Bub1 NHEJ function appears to be conserved in mammalian cells. 53BP1, which influences DSB repair by NHEJ, colocalizes with human BUB1 and is recruited to the break sites. Thus, while Bub is not a core component of NHEJ machinery, our data support its dual role in mitotic exit and promotion of NHEJ repair in yeast and mammals.     

Repair of Double-Strand DNA Breaks by the Human Nonhomologous DNA End Joining Pathway: The Iterative Processing Model

Naturally-occurring ionizing radiation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) from oxidative metabolism are factors that have challenged all life forms during the course of evolution. Ionizing radiation (IR) and reactive oxygen species cause a diverse set of double-strand DNA end configurations. Nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) is an optimal DNA repair pathway for dealing with such a diverse set of DNA lesions. NHEJ can carry out nucleolytic, polymerase, and ligation operations on each strand independently. This iterative processing nature of NHEJ is ideal for repair of pathologic and physiologic double-strand breaks because it permits sequential action of the NHEJ enzymes on each DNA end and on each strand. The versatility of the Artemis:DNA-PKcs endonuclease in cleaving 5’ and 3’ overhangs, hairpins, gaps, flaps, and various loop conformations makes it well-suited for DNA end modifications on oxidized overhangs. In addition, the ability to cleave stem-loop and hairpin structures permits it to open terminal fold-back configurations that may arise at DNA ends after IR damage. The ability of the XRCC4:DNA ligase IV complex to ligate one strand without ligation of the other permits additional end joining flexibility in NHEJ and raises the possibility of optional involvement of repair proteins from other pathways.     

RIF1 Is Essential for 53BP1-Dependent Nonhomologous End Joining and Suppression of DNA Double-Strand Break Resection

1. Download : Download high-res image (298KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent CSR and fusion of dysfunctional telomeres ? BRCA1 antagonizes RIF1 in S phase to prevent error-prone repair by toxic NHEJ ? N-terminal phospho-SQ/TQ domain of 53BP1 interacts with and recruits RIF1 to DSBs ? RIF1 and 53BP1 promote NHEJ in G1 by blocking 5′ end resection of DSBs     

Proofreading Activity of DNA Polymerase Pol2 Mediates 3′-End Processing during Nonhomologous End Joining in Yeast

Genotoxic agents that cause double-strand breaks (DSBs) often generate damage at the break termini. Processing enzymes, including nucleases and polymerases, must remove damaged bases and/or add new bases before completion of repair. Artemis is a nuclease involved in mammalian nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), but in Saccharomyces cerevisiae the nucleases and polymerases involved in NHEJ pathways are poorly understood. Only Pol4 has been shown to fill the gap that may form by imprecise pairing of overhanging 3′ DNA ends. We previously developed a chromosomal DSB assay in yeast to study factors involved in NHEJ. Here, we use this system to examine DNA polymerases required for NHEJ in yeast. We demonstrate that Pol2 is another major DNA polymerase involved in imprecise end joining. Pol1 modulates both imprecise end joining and more complex chromosomal rearrangements, and Pol3 is primarily involved in NHEJ-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. While Pol4 is the major polymerase to fill the gap that may form by imprecise pairing of overhanging 3′ DNA ends, Pol2 is important for the recession of 3′ flaps that can form during imprecise pairing. Indeed, a mutation in the 3′-5′ exonuclease domain of Pol2 dramatically reduces the frequency of end joins formed with initial 3′ flaps. Thus, Pol2 performs a key 3′ end-processing step in NHEJ.     

原核生物的NHEJ修复途径

DNA双链断裂(DSBs)是严重的DNA损伤形式之一,生物体对DSBs的修复可通过同源重组(HR)或非同源末端连接途径(NHEJ)进行。长期以来,人们普遍认为HR是细菌DSBs修复的惟一途径,但在分支杆菌和其它原核生物体内NHEJ途径的发现,使这一观念得以颠覆。最近的研究表明,细菌NHEJ修复系统是一个双组分系统,包含一个多功能的DNA连接酶(LigD)和DNA末端结合蛋白Ku,具有DSBs修复所需的断裂末段识别、末端加工和连接活性。重点综述细菌NHEJ修复系统的组成、结构以及生理功能。     

Intrachromosomal Gene Amplification Triggered by Hairpin-Capped Breaks Requires Homologous Recombination and is Independent of Nonhomologous End-Joining

Gene amplification is one of the major mechanisms of acquisition of drug resistance and activation of oncogenes in tumors. In mammalian cells, amplified chromosomal regions are manifested cytogenetically as extrachromosomal double minutes (DMs) and chromosomal homogeneously staining regions (HSRs). We recently demonstrated using yeast model system that hairpin-capped double strand breaks (DSBs) generated at the location of human Alu-quasipalindromes can trigger both types of gene amplification. Specifically, the dicentric chromosomes arising from replication of hairpin-capped molecules can be precursors for intrachromosomal amplicons. The formation of HSRs can be accounted for either by breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle which necessitates nonhomologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) or by the repair event involving homologous recombination (HR). In this study, we report that intrachromosomal gene amplification mediated by hairpin-capped DSBs is independent of NHEJ machinery, however requires the functions of Rad52 and Rad51 proteins. Based on our observations, we propose a HR-dependent mechanism to explain how the breakage of dicentric chromosomes can lead to the formation of HSRs.     

A Mechanism to Minimize Errors during Non-homologous End Joining

1. Download : Download high-res image (150KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Artemis and Nonhomologous End Joining-Independent Influence of DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit on Chromosome Stability

Deficiency in both ATM and the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is synthetically lethal in developing mouse embryos. Using mice that phenocopy diverse aspects of Atm deficiency, we have analyzed the genetic requirements for embryonic lethality in the absence of functional DNA-PKcs. Similar to the loss of ATM, hypomorphic mutations of Mre11 (Mre11^ATLD1) led to synthetic lethality when juxtaposed with DNA-PKcs deficiency (Prkdc^scid). In contrast, the more moderate DNA double-strand break response defects associated with the Nbs1^ΔB allele permitted viability of some Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Prkdc^scid/scid embryos. Cell cultures from Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Prkdc^scid/scid embryos displayed severe defects, including premature senescence, mitotic aberrations, sensitivity to ionizing radiation, altered checkpoint responses, and increased chromosome instability. The known functions of DNA-PKcs in the regulation of Artemis nuclease activity or nonhomologous end joining-mediated repair do not appear to underlie the severe genetic interaction. Our results reveal a role for DNA-PKcs in the maintenance of S/G₂-phase chromosome stability and in the induction of cell cycle checkpoint responses.The Mre11 complex, consisting of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 (Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), is involved in diverse aspects of DNA double-strand break (DSB) metabolism. The Mre11 complex acts as a DSB sensor, mediates cell cycle checkpoint arrest and apoptosis, and promotes DSB repair (47, 48). The influence of the Mre11 complex on DSB responses is attributable partly to its influence on ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase activity (29). ATM is a central signal transducer in the response to DSBs and is required for arrest throughout the cell cycle, as well as the efficient execution of apoptosis in response to many types of genotoxic stress (43).The Mre11 complex is required for ATM activation and governs the phosphorylation of ATM substrates such as SMC1, Chk2, and BID (4, 6, 26, 47, 49, 51). The C terminus of Nbs1 interacts with ATM and plays an important role in facilitating a subset of these events, particularly those important for apoptosis (11, 14, 47, 58). However, ATM makes multiple functional contacts with members of the Mre11 complex. Nbs1, Mre11, and Rad50 are all ATM substrates, and many aspects of ATM checkpoint signaling are impaired by hypomorphic Mre11 and Nbs1 mutations that do not affect the ATM binding domain in the C terminus of Nbs1 (32, 36, 52, 54).Several molecular and genetic observations support the view that the Mre11 complex''s role in preserving genome stability is particularly relevant to the S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle (3, 56). The complex, predominantly nucleoplasmic in G₁ cells, becomes predominantly chromatin associated and colocalizes with PCNA throughout S phase (35, 38). This association is a likely prerequisite for the complex''s influence on DNA damage signaling as well as DNA repair.Cell cultures established with samples from patients with Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS1 hypomorphism) and ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder (MRE11 hypomorphism) exhibit checkpoint defects in S phase and at the G₂/M transition, while the G₁/S transition is relatively unaffected. These checkpoint defects are correlated with reduced Mre11 complex chromatin association both in human cells and in mouse models of Nijmegen breakage syndrome and ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder (5, 45, 49, 52). Chromosomal aberrations arising in these cells are predominantly chromatid type breaks, consistent with impaired metabolism of DNA replication-associated DNA breaks (49, 52).Further supporting a predominant role for the Mre11 complex in S phase is the observation that its primary role in DSB repair is the promotion of recombination between sister chromatids (3, 24). Structural and genetic evidence that the Mre11 complex effects molecular bridging between DNA duplexes offers a mechanistic basis for this observation (10, 23, 53). Molecular bridging by the Mre11 complex may also contribute to its influence on nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (12, 34, 57). Collectively, these data strongly support the view that the Mre11 complex''s checkpoint and DSB repair functions are manifested predominantly in the S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle.Although the Mre11 complex and ATM function in the same arm of the DNA damage response, ATM deficiency is lethal in hypomorphic Mre11 and Nbs1 mutants (Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB mice, respectively) (49, 52), suggesting that aspects of ATM function are Mre11 complex independent. ATM deficiency is also synthetically lethal with mutations in Prkdc, the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) that is mutated in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency (Prkdc^scid mice) (22, 42). DNA-PKcs is an ATM paralog required for NHEJ, which appears to be the predominant mode of DSB repair in G₁ cells (16).Defective NHEJ is unlikely to be the basis for the embryonic lethality of Prkdc^−/− Atm^−/− or Prkdc^scid/scid Atm^−/− mice, as loss of ATM rescues the late embryonic lethality of both DNA ligase IV (Lig4) and XRCC4 null embryos, which have more severe NHEJ defects than Prkdc^scid mice abolished by the Atm^−/− genotype (31, 42). These observations argue that the DNA-PKcs functions required for viability in the absence of ATM do not include NHEJ.To address this issue, we crossed Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB mice with Prkdc^scid/scid mice. As these Mre11 complex hypomorphs do not completely phenocopy ATM deficiency, we reasoned that double-mutant animals would be viable and thus provide a venue in which to examine the functional relationship between the Mre11 complex/ATM arm of the DNA damage response and DNA-PKcs. Whereas the Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 mutation was synthetically lethal with the Prkdc^scid/scid genotype, some Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Prkdc^scid/scid mice were born, consistent with the more moderate DNA damage response defects associated with the Nbs1^ΔB allele than with the Mre11^ATLD1 allele (48). Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Prkdc^scid/scid embryos were born at drastically reduced Mendelian ratios, displayed gross developmental defects, and were severely runted. Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Prkdc^scid/scid cell cultures exhibited profound chromosome instability, growth defects, and increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR). DNA repair defects associated with DNA-PKcs deficiency did not appear to underlie the observed phenotypic synergy. Rather, the data suggest a novel regulatory function of DNA-PKcs in the maintenance of chromosomal stability during the S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle.     

Cell Cycle-Dependent Role of MRN at Dysfunctional Telomeres: ATM Signaling-Dependent Induction of Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) in G1 and Resection-Mediated Inhibition of NHEJ in G2

Here, we address the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex in the response to telomeres rendered dysfunctional by deletion of the shelterin component TRF2. Using conditional NBS1/TRF2 double-knockout MEFs, we show that MRN is required for ATM signaling in response to telomere dysfunction. This establishes that MRN is the only sensor for the ATM kinase and suggests that TRF2 might block ATM signaling by interfering with MRN binding to the telomere terminus, possibly by sequestering the telomere end in the t-loop structure. We also examined the role of the MRN/ATM pathway in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) of damaged telomeres. NBS1 deficiency abrogated the telomere fusions that occur in G₁, consistent with the requirement for ATM and its target 53BP1 in this setting. Interestingly, NBS1 and ATM, but not H2AX, repressed NHEJ at dysfunctional telomeres in G₂, specifically at telomeres generated by leading-strand DNA synthesis. Leading-strand telomere ends were not prone to fuse in the absence of either TRF2 or MRN/ATM, indicating redundancy in their protection. We propose that MRN represses NHEJ by promoting the generation of a 3′ overhang after completion of leading-strand DNA synthesis. TRF2 may ensure overhang formation by recruiting MRN (and other nucleases) to newly generated telomere ends. The activation of the MRN/ATM pathway by the dysfunctional telomeres is proposed to induce resection that protects the leading-strand ends from NHEJ when TRF2 is absent. Thus, the role of MRN at dysfunctional telomeres is multifaceted, involving both repression of NHEJ in G₂ through end resection and induction of NHEJ in G₁ through ATM-dependent signaling.Mammalian telomeres solve the end protection problem through their association with shelterin. The shelterin factor TRF2 (telomere repeat-binding factor 2) protects chromosome ends from inappropriate DNA repair events that threaten the integrity of the genome (reviewed in reference 32). When TRF2 is removed by Cre-mediated deletion from conditional knockout mouse embryo fibroblasts (TRF2^F/− MEFs), telomeres activate the ATM kinase pathway and are processed by the canonical nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway to generate chromosome end-to-end fusions (10, 11).The repair of telomeres in TRF2-deficient cells is readily monitored in metaphase spreads. Over the course of four or five cell divisions, the majority of chromosome ends become fused, resulting in metaphase spreads displaying the typical pattern of long trains of joined chromosomes (10). The reproducible pace and the efficiency of telomere NHEJ have allowed the study of factors involved in its execution and regulation. In addition to depending on the NHEJ factors Ku70 and DNA ligase IV (10, 11), telomere fusions are facilitated by the ATM kinase (26). This aspect of telomere NHEJ is mediated through the ATM kinase target 53BP1. 53BP1 accumulates at telomeres in TRF2-depleted cells and stimulates chromatin mobility, thereby promoting the juxtaposition of distantly positioned chromosome ends prior to their fusion (18). Telomere NHEJ is also accelerated by the ATM phosphorylation target MDC1, which is required for the prolonged association of 53BP1 at sites of DNA damage (19).Although loss of TRF2 leads to telomere deprotection at all stages of the cell cycle, NHEJ of uncapped telomeres takes place primarily before their replication in G₁ (25). Postreplicative (G₂) telomere fusions can occur at a low frequency upon TRF2 deletion, but only when cyclin-dependent kinase activity is inhibited with roscovitine (25). The target of Cdk1 in this setting is not known.Here, we dissect the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex and H2AX at telomeres rendered dysfunctional through deletion of TRF2. The highly conserved MRN complex has been proposed to function as the double-stranded break (DSB) sensor in the ATM pathway (reviewed in references 34 and 35). In support of this model, Mre11 interacts directly with DNA ends via two carboxy-terminal DNA binding domains (13, 14); the recruitment of MRN to sites of damage is independent of ATM signaling, as it occurs in the presence of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinase inhibitor caffeine (29, 44); in vitro analysis has demonstrated that MRN is required for activation of ATM by linear DNAs (27); a mutant form of Rad50 (Rad50S) can induce ATM signaling in the absence of DNA damage (31); and phosphorylation of ATM targets in response to ionizing radiation is completely abrogated upon deletion of NBS1 from MEFs (17). These data and the striking similarities between syndromes caused by mutations in ATM, Nbs1, and Mre11 (ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, and ataxia telangiectasia-like disease, respectively) are consistent with a sensor function for MRN.MRN has also been implicated in several aspects of DNA repair. Potentially relevant to DNA repair events, Mre11 dimers can bridge and align the two DNA ends in vitro (49) and Rad50 may promote long-range tethering of sister chromatids (24, 50). In addition, a binding partner of the MRN complex, CtIP, has been implicated in end resection of DNA ends during homology-directed repair (39, 45). The role of MRN in NHEJ has been much less clear. MRX, the yeast orthologue of MRN, functions during NHEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (28, 30). In mammalian cells, MRN is not recruited to I-SceI-induced DSBs in G₁, whereas Ku70 is, and MRN does not appear to be required for NHEJ-mediated repair of these DSBs (38, 54). On the other hand, MRN promotes class switch recombination (37) and has been implicated in accurate NHEJ repair during V(D)J recombination (22).The involvement of MRN in ATM signaling and DNA repair pathways has been intriguing from the perspective of telomere biology. While several of the attributes of MRN might be considered a threat to telomere integrity, MRN is known to associate with mammalian telomeres, most likely through an interaction with the TRF2 complex (48, 51, 57). MRN has been implicated in the generation of the telomeric overhang (12), the telomerase pathway (36, 52), the ALT pathway (55), and the protection of telomeres from stochastic deletion events (1). It has also been speculated that MRN may contribute to formation of the t-loop structure (16). t-loops, the lariats formed through the strand invasion of the telomere terminus into the duplex telomeric DNA (21), are thought to contribute to telomere protection by effectively shielding the chromosome end from DNA damage response factors that interact with DNA ends, including nucleases, and the Ku heterodimer (15).H2AX has been studied extensively in the context of chromosome-internal DSBs. When a DSB is formed, ATM acts near the lesion to phosphorylate a conserved carboxy-terminal serine of H2AX, a histone variant present throughout the genome (7). Phosphorylated H2AX (referred to as γ-H2AX) promotes the spreading of DNA damage factors over several megabases along the damaged chromatin and mediates the amplification of the DNA damage signal (43). The signal amplification is accomplished through a sequence of phospho-specific interactions among γ-H2AX, MDC1, NBS1, RNF8, and RNF168, which results in the additional binding of ATM and additional phosphorylation of H2AX in adjacent chromatin (reviewed in reference 33). The formation of these large domains of altered chromatin, referred to as irradiation-induced foci at DSBs and telomere dysfunction-induced foci (TIFs) at dysfunctional telomeres (44), promotes the binding of several factors implicated in DNA repair, including the BRCA1 A complex and 53BP1 (33).In agreement with a role for H2AX in DNA repair, H2AX-deficient cells exhibit elevated levels of irradiation-induced chromosome abnormalities (5, 9). In addition, H2AX-null B cells are prone to chromosome breaks and translocations in the immunoglobulin locus, indicative of impaired class switch recombination, a process that involves the repair of DSBs through the NHEJ pathway (9, 20). Since H2AX is dispensable for the activation of irradiation-induced checkpoints (8), these data argue that H2AX contributes directly to DNA repair. However, a different set of studies has concluded that H2AX is not required for NHEJ during V(D)J recombination (5, 9) but that it plays a role in homology-directed repair (53). In this study, we have further queried the contribution of H2AX to NHEJ in the context of dysfunctional telomeres.Our aim was to dissect the contribution of MRN and H2AX to DNA damage signaling and NHEJ-mediated repair in response to telomere dysfunction elicited by deletion of TRF2. Importantly, since ATM is the only kinase activated in this setting, deletion of TRF2 can illuminate the specific contribution of these factors in the absence of the confounding effects of ATR signaling (26). This approach revealed a dual role for MRN at telomeres, involving both its function as a sensor in the ATM pathway and its ability to protect telomeres from NHEJ under certain circumstances.     

AMPK Interactome Reveals New Function in Non-homologous End Joining DNA Repair

1. Download : Download high-res image (195KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •Each component of the AMPK trimeric complex was profiled by interaction proteomics.
• •The subunit composition of the AMPK complex directs interactions to distinct proteins.
• •AMPK interacts with Artemis and plays a role in Non-Homologous End Joining.

     

CHK1 Affecting Cell Radiosensitivity is Independent of Non-Homologous End Joining

CHK1 is one of the most important checkpoint proteins in mammalian cells for responding toDNA damage. Cells defective in CHK1 are sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR). The mechanismby which CHK1 protects cells from IR-induced killing remains unclear. DNA double strandbreaks (DSBs) induced by IR are critical lesions for cell survival. Two major complementaryDNA DSBs repair pathways exist in mammalian cells, homologous recombination repair (HRR)and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). By using CHK1 kinase dead human cell linesestablished in our laboratory, we show here that although these human cell lines have differentCHK1 activities with different sensitivities to IR-induced killing and G2 accumulation, all thesecell lines show similar inductions and rejoining rates of DNA DSBs. These results indicate thatthe different radiosensitivities and G2 checkpoint responses in these cell lines are independent ofNHEJ, suggesting that CHK1-regulated checkpoint facilitates HRR and therefore protects cellsfrom IR-induced killing.