Control of Azospirillum brasilense NifA activity by PII: effect of replacing Tyr residues of the NifA N-terminal domain on NifA activity

It was previously reported that the N-terminal domain of Azospirillum brasilense NifA was a negative regulator of the NifA activity and that the P(II) protein prevented this inhibition under nitrogen fixing conditions. Here, we show that a mutation of a single Tyr residue at position 18 of the N-terminal domain of NifA led to an active NifA protein that did not require P(II) for activation under nitrogen fixation conditions.     

Modulation of NifA activity by PII in Azospirillum brasilense: evidence for a regulatory role of the NifA N-terminal domain.

Azospirillum brasilense NifA, which is synthesized under all physiological conditions, exists in an active or inactive from depending on the availability of ammonia. The activity also depends on the presence of PII, as NifA is inactive in a glnB mutant. To investigate further the mechanism that regulates NifA activity, several deletions of the nifA coding sequence covering the amino-terminal domain of NifA were constructed. The ability of these truncated NifA proteins to activate the nifH promoter in the absence or presence of ammonia was assayed in A. brasilense wild-type and mutant strains. Our results suggest that the N-terminal domain is not essential for NifA activity. This domain plays an inhibitory role which prevents NifA activity in the presence of ammonia. The truncated proteins were also able to restore nif gene expression to a glnB mutant, suggesting that PII is required to activate NifA by preventing the inhibitory effect of its N-terminal domain under conditions of nitrogen fixation. Low levels of nitrogenase activity in the presence of ammonia were also observed when the truncated gene was introduced into a strain devoid of the ADP-ribosylation control of nitrogenase. We propose a model for the regulation of NifA activity in A. brasilense.     

Control of Herbaspirillum seropedicae NifA Activity by Ammonium Ions and Oxygen

The activity of a truncated form of Herbaspirillum seropedicae NifA in different genetic backgrounds showed that its regulatory domain is involved in nitrogen control but not in O₂ sensitivity or Fe dependence. The model for nitrogen control involving PII could thus apply to the proteobacteria at large. NifA may have a role in controlling ADP-ribosylation of nitrogenase in Azospirillum brasilense.     

Role of GlnK in NifL-Mediated Regulation of NifA Activity in Azotobacter vinelandii

In several diazotrophic species of Proteobacteria, P(II) signal transduction proteins have been implicated in the regulation of nitrogen fixation in response to NH(4)(+) by several mechanisms. In Azotobacter vinelandii, expression of nifA, encoding the nif-specific activator, is constitutive, and thus, regulation of NifA activity by the flavoprotein NifL appears to be the primary level of nitrogen control. In vitro and genetic evidence suggests that the nitrogen response involves the P(II)-like GlnK protein and GlnD (uridylyltransferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme), which reversibly uridylylates GlnK in response to nitrogen limitation. Here, the roles of GlnK and GlnK-UMP in A. vinelandii were studied to determine whether the Nif (-) phenotype of glnD strains was due to an inability to modify GlnK, an effort previously hampered because glnK is an essential gene in this organism. A glnKY51F mutation, encoding an unuridylylatable form of the protein, was stable only in a strain in which glutamine synthetase activity is not inhibited by NH(4)(+), suggesting that GlnK-UMP is required to signal adenylyltransferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme-mediated deadenylylation. glnKY51F strains were significantly impaired for diazotrophic growth and expression of a nifH-lacZ fusion. NifL interacted with GlnK and GlnKY51F in a yeast two-hybrid system. Together, these data are consistent with those obtained from in vitro experiments (Little et al., EMBO J., 19:6041-6050, 2000) and support a model for regulation of NifA activity in which unmodified GlnK stimulates NifL inhibition and uridylylation of GlnK in response to nitrogen limitation prevents this function. This model is distinct from one proposed for the related bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae, in which unmodified GlnK relieves NifL inhibition instead of stimulating it.     

Oxygen, the NifA gene, Nodule Structure and the Initiation of Nitrogen Fixation

Both nitrogenase and the NifA gene, which controls the expressionof the nitrogenase enzyme, require microaerobic conditions inthe infected zone of a nodule. Such conditions depend on theability of the respiratory system to consume oxygen at approximatelythe maximum rate at which it can enter that region by diffusion.The balance between consumption and supply governs the minimumsize of a functional nodule. The nature of this balance is exploredin this paper using a model. It shows that it appears physicallyimpossible for legume root nodules, below a certain minimumsize, to fix nitrogen. Furthermore, experimental data are usedto suggest that the alternative oxidase respiratory systemsmay initially provide the large respiratory capacity requiredto create microaerobic conditions, suitable for the NifA geneand nitrogenase. Nitrogen fixation, NifA gene, diffusion resistance, oxygen     

Functional difference between <Emphasis Type="Italic">Sinorhizobium meliloti</Emphasis> NifA and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Enterobacter cloacae</Emphasis> NifA

The nifA gene is an important regulatory gene and its product, NifA protein, regulates the expression of many nif genes involved in the nitrogen fixation process. We introduced multiple copies of the constitutively expressed Sinorhizobium meliloti (Sm) or Enterobacter cloacae (Ec) nifA gene into both the nifA mutant strain SmY and the wild-type strain Sm1021. Root nodules produced by SmY containing a constitutively expressed Sm nifA gene were capable of fixing nitrogen, while nodules produced by SmY containing the Ec nifA gene remained unable to fix nitrogen, as is the case for SmY itself. However, transfer of an additional Sm nifA gene into Sm1021 improved the nitrogen-fixing efficiency of root nodules to a greater extent than that observed upon transfer of the Ec nifA gene into Sm1021. Comparative analysis of amino acid sequences between Sm NifA and Ec NifA showed that the N-terminal domain was the least similar, but this domain is indispensable for complementation of the Fix^- phenotype of SmY by Sm NifA. We conclude that more than one domain is involved in determining functional differences between Sm NifA and Ec NifA.