补体第六成分（C6）在汉族5个群体中的多态分布

用聚丙烯酰胺等电聚焦技术和免疫酶标法,调查分析了汉族5个群体补体第六成分(C6)的遗传多态性,得出基因频率如下。郑州汉族:C6*A 0.4521、C6*B 0.5228、C6*B_2 0.0183、和C6*R 0.0068。兰州汉族:C6*A 0.4612、C6*B 0.5218和C6*B_2 0.0170。呼和浩特汉族:C6*A 0.4452、C6*B 0.5286、C6*B_2 0.0214和C6*R 0.0048。西安汉族:C6*A 0.4899、C6*B 0.4874、C6*B_2 0.0126和C6*R 0.0101。广东梅州客家人:C6*A 0.4569、C6*B 0.5152和C6*B_2 0.0279。C6*R为罕见等位基因之频率。     

云南汉族HLA-DRB1多态性分析及与9个汉族群体的比较

主要应用聚合酶链反应—微孔板杂交(Polymerase Chain Reaction and Microtitre Plate Hybridization,PCR-MPH)的方法对云南129个无亲缘关系的汉族样品进行了HLA-DRB1的遗传多态性分析,对MPH初分出的DRB1*15组的样品进行了单链构象多态（Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism, SSCP）检测。共发现36种等位基因,其中等位基因频率大于0.05的有DRB1*1501(0.1240),DRB1*09012(0.0969),DRB1*08032(0.0930),DRB1*1202(0.0891),DRB1*1201(0.0814),DRB1 *1401(0.0775),DRB1 *0701(0.0620)。云南汉族HLA-DRB1等位基因频率与中国其他9个汉族群体进行χ²检验,结果显示与云南汉族比较χ²>10的有西安汉族（DR8,χ²=13.9712）、上海汉族（DR4,χ²=10.1632）、广东汉族（DR9,χ²=12.6121）和南京汉族（DR4,χ²=10.5796）。从遗传距离分析发现,在9个国内汉族群体中云南汉族与辽宁汉族有最近的距离（0.0541）,而与广东汉族最远（0.1851）。云南汉族在构成上可能与辽宁汉族更为接近,尽管地处南方,但已不属典型的南方汉族。这也可能因云南汉族与当地的少数民族存在基因交流,从而形成了一个较为特殊的群体。     

五个汉族群体C7的遗传多态性

在国内首次用等电聚焦和酶连免疫标记方法调查哈尔滨、西安、成都、贵阳、漳州等五个汉族群体的补体第七成分(C7)的遗传多态性。结果表明,C7*1基因频率最高,在0.8152至0.9144之间。C7*2频率在四个亚群中为0.0528至0.0849,但在贵阳人群中高达0.1527,是目前世界上已观察到的最高值。C7*4频率在五个亚群中无显著差异,在0.0180至0.0402之间。没有观察到C7*4有由北方人群扩散到南方的明显趋势。在南方的三个汉族亚群中观察到在高加索人和日本人群中存在的C7*3基因。     

4个HLA等位基因在5个民族中分布的多样性研究

应用ARMS-SSP结合的方法调查与AIDS相关的HLA等位基因,即HLA-A*02,B*35,B*27,B*57四个基因在五个民族群体（云南汉族、彝族、傣族、新疆维吾尔族、广西壮族）中的分布情况,并进行了相应的遗传学分析。结果显示,HLA-A*02在壮族和汉族中检出的阳性样本频率非常高,在另外几个民族中的分布频率偏低;B*35基因在各民族中分布差异不大;B*27在傣族中的分布频率较高,汉族、彝族和壮族中分布的频率差异不大;B*57则在各民族中的分布差异不大;保护性的等位基因即A*02,B*27,B*57的基因型频率在5个民族中有极显著的差异。此课题增进了对我国部分AIDS流行地区AIDS相关HLA等位基因型遗传背景的了解,是对HLA与AIDS相关性研究资料的有益补充。     

CCR2-64Ⅰ在中国南方14个少数民族群体中的分布

为调查HIV-1感染相关等位基因CCR2-64Ⅰ在我国南方14个少数民族群体的频率和多态性分布, 从上述人群外周血中抽提基因组DNA, 采用PCR和PCR-RFLP等方法进行基因分型。在791例调查对象中, 636例是野生纯合子基因型, 104例为杂合子基因型, 51例为突变纯合子基因型。上述各群体等位基因型的分布符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡。14个民族群体的平均突变基因频率为13.6％, 等位基因频率范围分布在1.6％~30.3％之间, 14个民族群体之间突变基因频率具有显著差异(P<0.05)。广西壮族群体CCR2-64Ⅰ突变基因频率最低, 为1.6％, 云南的六库傈僳族频率最高, 为30.3％。12个群体的突变基因频率均低于中国汉族健康群体, 南方3个少数民族群体基因突变频率显著低于西南11个少数民族群体, 该突变基因在艾滋病发病过程中的影响值得进一步深入研究。     

我国东北地区3个群体DYS390多态位点的遗传学研究

目的　研究中国群体Y染色体微卫星位点 DYS390遗传多态性 ,可以用于追溯人类进化上的父系祖先 ,也可以为人类基因组和法医学等研究积累数据。方法　采用 PCR技术扩增微卫星DNA片段 ,再经变性凝胶电泳及银染方法 ,对我国东北地区汉族、蒙古族及朝鲜族 3个群体的1 0 2例男性个体的 DYS390位点的遗传多态性进行了研究。结果　除汉族群体发现 5种等位基因外 ,朝鲜族和蒙古族群体均检出 4种。在汉族群体中 ,我们检出 1例具223bp等位基因。等位基因频率分布在汉族、朝鲜族以211bp的频率为最高 ,分别为0.439和0.451 ;而蒙古族群体则以215bp的频率为最高 (0.433)。结论　 3个群体之间 DYS390位点等位基因频率无显著性差异 ( Fisher精确概率检验 :P=0.930 )。 3个群体中DYS390位点 5种等位基因的分化程度以223bp为最高 ,分化程度最低的为211bp。聚类分析表明3个群体的父系亲缘关系较为密切 ,其中以汉族与朝鲜族之间的遗传距离最近。     

洛阳市汉族群体ADH2和ALDH2的基因多态性研究

为研究洛阳市汉族群体ADH2和ALDH2基因的多态性分布,应用聚合酶链反应-扩增片段长度多态性（PCR-APLP）分析法,对ADH2基因外显子3和ALDH2基因外显子12的特定片段同时进行特异性扩增,用非变性的聚丙烯酰胺垂直凝胶电泳和DNA银染方法判定基因型。ADH2*1和ADH2*2等位基因频率分别为42.86%和57.14%,ADH2*1/*1、*1/*2和*2/*2的基因型频率分别为22.86%、40.00%和37.14%;ALDH2*1和ALDH2*2的等位基因频率分别为85.24%和14.76%,ALDH2*1/*1、*1/*2和*2/*2的基因型频率分别为71.43%、27.62%和0.95%。洛阳市汉族群体ADH2和ALDH2的等位基因频率和基因型频率不同于台湾人和上海人,ALDH2*1/*1基因型频率明显高于上海人和台湾人的。因而,洛阳市居民对酒精的耐受性比上海人和台湾人强。 Studies of Genetic Polymorphisms of ADH2 and ALDH2 among the Han Population in Luoyang China ZHANG Zhu-mei1,LIU Cha-zhen1,BIAN Jian-chao1,TANG Bo-ming2,JIANG Feng1,WANG Qi-jun2,WANG Qi-min2,ZHU Xin2,SHEN Fu-min1 1.Department of Epidemiology,Public Health School of Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China; 2.Section Office of Epidemiology,Luoyang Hygiene and Anti-epidemic Center,Luoyang 471000,China Abstract:In order to investigate genetic polymorphisms of ADH2 and ALDH2 among the Han population in Luoyang City,portions of exon 3 of ADH2 and exon 12 of ALDH gene were amplified by using polymerase chain reaction.The amplified products were electrophoresed on 10% undenatured vertical polyacrylamide gels and stained with argentine.Frequencies of ADH2*1 and ADH2*2 alleles are 42.86% and 57.14%.Frequencies of three genotypes of ADH2 are 22.86%、40.00% and 37.14%,respectively.Frequencies of ALDH2*1 and ALDH2*2 alleles are 85.24% and 14.76%.Genotype frequencies of ALDH2 loci are 71.43%、27.62% and 0.95%,respectively.Genetic polymorphisms of ADH2 and ALDH2 among the Han population in Luoyang City are different from those among Taiwanese and Shanghainese.Frequency of ALDH2*1/*1 in Luoyang people is higher than those in Shanghai and Taiwan.Therefore,there is a higher resistance to alcohol drinking in the Han population in Luoyang. Key words：polymerase chain reaction-amplified products length polymorphism; alcohol dehydrogenase 2; aldehyde dehydrogenase 2; genetic     

中国广东省四个民族C6别型遗传特点——附三个新的罕见变异型报道

应用等电聚焦-免疫印迹法调查了广东省四个民族(汉、苗、黎和回族)C6遗传多态性。广州地区汉族C6等位基因频率分别为:C6*A0.4225,C6*B0.5288,C6*B2 0.0387和C6*R(M91,M92,M11,B21)0.0100。海南岛三个少数民族C6遗传特点与广州汉族相似,均处于Hardy-Weinberg平衡状态。共发现五个罕见基因的杂合子,其中三个等位基因为首次报道。     

河南汉族群体6个STR基因座遗传多态性研究

对河南省河南籍汉族群体的6个短串联重复序列（Short tandem repeats,STR)基因座等位基因频率进行研究,得到河南汉族群体F13A1,F13B,D8S1179,CSF1PO,D5S818,TPOX基因座的群体遗传学依据。EDTA抗凝血样采自河南122名无血缘关系的汉族个体,采用Chelex法抽提DNA,PCR扩增,非变性聚丙烯酰胺垂直凝胶电泳,银染显色分析,得到6个基因座的等位基因频率,各基因座的杂合度分别为：0.62,0.46,0.83,0.59,0.78,0.65;人体识别率分别为0.78,0.66,0.95,0.79,0.92,0.82。6个STR基因座具有较高的杂合度,等位基因分布符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡,是较理想的遗传标记,可用于法医学个本识别和亲权鉴定。     

福建畲族群体17个Y-STR基因座单倍型及遗传关系

应用Y-filerTM试剂盒及基因分型技术,检测152份福建畲族无关男性个体17个Y-STR基因座的多态性分布,计算等位基因频率及单倍型多样性,并结合已公开发表的其他11个群体相应基因座的单倍型资料,分析福建畲族群体遗传距离和聚类关系。福建畲族DYS385a/b基因座检出50种单倍型,其余15个Y-STR基因座分别检出3-11个等位基因,基因多样性GD值在0.4037(DYS391)～0.9725(DYS385a/b);观察到DYS19和DYS390基因座双等位基因和DYS385a/b基因座三等位基因,以及DYS448等部分基因座出现的"off-ladder"等位基因现象。17个Y-STR基因座共同构成的单倍型144种,其中138种单倍型出现1次,5种出现2次,1种出现4次,累计GD值为0.9990。从遗传距离分析发现,福建畲族与浙江汉族之间的遗传距离最近(0.0042),与青海藏族(0.2378)之间的遗传距离相对较远。福建畲族最靠近由台湾群体、浙江汉族、南方汉族等典型南方汉族群体聚成的分支区域。结果表明该17个Y-STR基因座在福建畲族群体中具有丰富的遗传多态性,对建立Y染色体STR数据库,研究群体遗传学和进行法医学应用有重要意义。     

我国汉族人群的乙二醛酶Ⅰ遗传多态性

用琼脂糖平板凝胶电泳技术分析了我国六个城市的汉族共1238人的红细胞乙二醛酶I的遗传多态性。每个汉族人群的受检人数和GLO1*1基因频率分别为:郑州200人(0.1023),哈尔滨195人(0.1103),呼和浩特210人(0.1259),贵阳204人(0.1373),兰州210人(0.1476),西安199人(0.1508)。中国不同地区汉族人群之间的GLOI基因频率分布存在显著性差异,但这种差异明显小于中国不同少数民族之间的差异。     

汉族9个人群AcP_1、EsD及6-PGD的遗传多态性

用淀粉凝胶电泳法对我国汉族９个人群的红细胞酸性磷酸酶（ＡｃＰ１）、酯酶Ｄ（ＥｓＤ）、及６－磷酸葡萄糖酸脱氢酶（６－ＰＧＤ）的遗传多态性进行了研究。研究结果表明：兰州、呼和浩特、哈尔滨、西安、郑州、成都、贵阳、漳州、梅州等９市汉族人群的ＡｃＰＢ１基因频率依次为０．７９２９、０．８１６７、０．７９３８、０．８１３１、０．８０８８、０．８００５、０．７８９６、０．７７９４和０．７６７５;ＥｓＤ１基因频率依次为０．６４７３、０．６１４８、０．６４４３、０．６４３９、０．６４７５、０．６３０５、０．６２８７、０．５９０７和０．５８２５;６－ＰＧＯＡ基因频率依次为０．８８８１、０．９１４３、０．９３３０、０．９３１８、０．８７５６、０．９２１２、０．９１８８、０．９４６１和０．９３７５。ＥｓＤ１基因频率在中国南、北方人群间有差异,北方人群的ＥｓＤ１频率高于南方人群,随着北纬纬度由高向低,汉族人群ＥｓＤ１频率也随着从北向南降低。在中国汉族人群中,ＥｓＤ基因及６－ＰＧＤ基因分化比较显著,而ＡｃＰ基因分化则不显著     

我国瑶、汉、壮、苗、维五个民族补体成份B因子多态性的调查报告

用琼脂糖凝胶高压电泳及免疫固定技术对我国瑶、汉、壮、苗、维五个民族人群的补体B因子(Bf)的多态性进行了检测,结果显示,这五个民族的Bf基因频率均以s型最高,但参差不齐。从高到低的顺序是瑶0.9071,汉0.8727,壮0.8426,苗0.7667,维0.6622。BfF基因频率其次,但也高低不一,从高到低的顺序是维0.2680,苗0.2000,壮0.1343,汉0.1159,瑶0.0929。频率居第三位的是BfSO7,差别显著,维0.0586,苗0.0333,壮0.0232,汉0.0091,瑶0.0000。在罕见型方面,220例份汉族人中发现一例SO45杂合子,222例份维族中检出4例FO65及1例F1杂合子。本文结合我国其他民族及全球大量检测数据进行了一些对比讨论。     

An Analysis of HLA-A, -B,and -DRB1 Allele and Haplotype Frequencies of 21,918 Residents Living in Liaoning,China

HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 allele frequencies and their haplotype frequencies in 21,918 Chinese residents living in Liaoning Province, who were registered as volunteer donors of China Marrow Donor Registry, were investigated. They are composed of 93.37% Han Chinese, 5.1% Manchus, 0.57% Mongols, 0.46% Hui persons, 0.29% Koreans and 0.14% Xibe ethnic group. In total eighteen different HLA-A alleles, forty-eight different HLA-B alleles and fourteen different HLA-DRB1 alleles have been identified. Their frequencies are in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. For Han Chinese in Liaoning, 1,534 different HLA-A-B-DRB1 haplotypes were identified, with a frequency of higher than 0.01%. A*30-B*13-DRB1*07, A*02-B*46-DRB1*09 and A*02-B*13-DRB1*12 are the most frequent haplotypes among Liaoning Han. While Liaoning Han, Liaoning Manchu, Liaoning Mongol, Liaoning Hui and Liaoning Korean share the northern Han characteristic haplotypes, all minority ethnic groups with the exception of Liaoning Manchu have developed their own unique HLA profiles. This dataset characterizes the HLA allele and haplotype frequencies in the Liaoning area and suggests that it is different from those in other parts of China and ethnic groups, which implicates transplant donor searching strategies and studies on population genetics.     

云南九个民族中的近亲结婚调查

对云南9个民族[傣、哈尼、彝、布朗、基诺、拉祐、苦聪(人)、回、汉]共11,589起婚姻作了调查。发现:(1)城、乡之间,各民族与地区之间,近婚率差异极显著。(2)许多民族的近婚率均较国内发达地区同一民族高。(3)姑舅亲、倒姑舅、两姨亲及3/2表亲占9个民族近婚总数的84.7％。(4〕9个民族的平均近交系数同样较国内发达地区同一民族高,其中苦聪人的平均近交系数(0.018579)是目前国内最高数值之一,即使平均近交系数最低的汉族(0.001935)也明显高于北京、湖北宜昌和上海市区的汉族的平均近交系数。     

Genetic distances between Chinese populations calculated on gene frequencies of 38 loci

Genetic distances were calculated for Han subpopulations in different provinces, cities and au-tonomous regions and ethnic minorities in China by using gene frequency data of 38 loci, and genetic trees were con-structed. The results showed that, among both Han and ethnic minorities, there were two types, i.e. southern and northern Mongoloids, with Yangtze River as boundary. Therefore, both African origin theory and local origin theory about the modern man should answer the question; when did these two types separate and how did they develop. This paper also conclusively proved genetically that the Han subpopulations in different regions are genetically close to the lo-cal ethnic minorities, which indicates that much blood of ethnic minorities has mixed into Han, at the same time, some blood of Han also has mixed into the local ethnic minorities.     

Population studies in northern Sweden. XVII. Estimates of Finnish and Saamish influence

The North-Swedish population is a mixture of Finnish, Saamish and Central-Swedish ethnic groups. We have studied the Finnish and Saamish admixture by means of genetic markers in 23 North-Swedish subpopulations. The Finnish influence was estimated using the transferrin genes B0-1, DCHI and C3 and the enzyme gene SOD1*2, and markers for Saamish influence were the blood group gene ABO*A2, the serum group gene GC*1F and the enzyme gene 6PGD*C. In the subpopulations the Finnish influence (admixture) varied between 0 and 84% and the Saamish influence between 0 and 34%. The Saamish influence was strongest in the western and northern parts of the area. In the northern part of the area, between 1/4 and 1/3 of the gene pool of the present-day population may be Saamish in origin. The Finnish influence was strongest in the northern and northeastern parts of the area. In the subpopulations along the Finnish border, between 60 and 80% of the gene pool may be Finnish in origin. Significant correlations were found between the Saamish marker genes and between the Finnish marker genes. Due to geographical overlapping of Finnish and Saamish influence, significant correlations were also found between Finnish and Saamish marker genes. The geographical pictures of Saamish and Finnish influence in northern Sweden showed a fair agreement with the expectations derived from historical knowledge. Although a substantial part of the genetic heterogeneity of the North-Swedish population is ethnic in origin, it is obvious that founder effect and genetic drift also have played an important role.