A rural emergency department.

The appropriate use of emergency departments is of growing concern. By knowing which patients are more likely to make inappropriate visits to these departments, efforts can be directed to encourage more suitable care. Our study was done in a rural county hospital in eastern New Mexico. Data were collected from all emergency department visits over a 4-week period. Patient and physician questionnaires were administered to assess aspects of emergency department use, including appropriateness based on published criteria, physicians'' opinion of appropriateness, groups who made inappropriate visits, and the perception of the need for and the urgency of a visit. We found that 32% of visits were inappropriate based on published criteria and 24% were considered inappropriate by physician opinion. Two groups with a high rate of inappropriate visits were Hispanics and Medicaid recipients. Patients and physicians have differing opinions of the urgency of a visit and of how soon medical treatment is required. To decrease the frequency of inappropriate use of emergency departments, educational efforts should be focused on the subgroups with high rates of such use.     

Incidence,severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: a prospective study

Background

Medication-related visits to the emergency department are an important but poorly understood phenomenon. We sought to evaluate the frequency, severity and preventability of drug-related visits to the emergency department.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study of randomly selected adults presenting to the emergency department over a 12-week period. Emergency department visits were identified as drug-related on the basis of assessment by a pharmacist research assistant and an emergency physician; discrepancies were adjudicated by 2 independent reviewers.

Results

Among the 1017 patients included in the study, the emergency department visit was identified as drug-related for 122 patients (12.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.1%–14.2%); of these, 83 visits (68.0%, 95% CI 59.0%–76.2%) were deemed preventable. Severity was classified as mild in 15.6% of the 122 cases, moderate in 74.6% and severe in 9.8%. The most common reasons for drug-related visits were adverse drug reactions (39.3%), nonadherence (27.9%) and use of the wrong or suboptimal drug (11.5%). The probability of admission was significantly higher among patients who had a drug-related visit than among those whose visit was not drug-related (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46–3.27, p < 0.001), and among those admitted, the median length of stay was longer (8.0 [interquartile range 23.5] v. 5.5 [interquartile range 10.0] days, p = 0.06).

Interpretation

More than 1 in 9 emergency department visits are due to drug-related adverse events, a potentially preventable problem in our health care system.Adverse drug-related events are unfavourable occurrences related to the use or misuse of medications.¹ It has been estimated that such events account for 17 million emergency department visits and 8.7 million hospital admissions annually in the United States.^2,3 Between 1995 and 2000, costs associated with adverse drug-related events rose from US$76.6 billion to over US$177.4 billion.^3,4Adverse drug-related events have recently been evaluated in ambulatory care settings and among patients admitted to hospital,^5–9 and it has been estimated that 5%–25% of hospital admissions are drug-related.^7,8 Unfortunately, emergency department visits are not reflected in most hospital studies, because patients seen in the emergency department for an adverse drug-related event are typically not admitted.¹⁰ In addition, most research evaluating drug-related visits to the emergency department has involved retrospective studies or analysis of administrative data.^11–13 Retrospective studies may underestimate the incidence of drug-related visits because information may be missing or inaccurately documented.¹⁴ Finally, studies performed to date have used variable definitions of “drug-related events,”^1,10 which limits comparative evaluation and generalizability.Despite the burden of drug-related morbidity and mortality, prospective research characterizing drug-related visits to the emergency department has been limited.^15–17 We sought to overcome some of the limitations of research in this area by using a prospective design and a comprehensive definition of adverse drug-related events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, severity and preventability of drug-related visits to the emergency department of a large tertiary care hospital, to classify the visits by type of drug-related problem and to identify patient, prescriber, drug and system factors associated with these visits.     

Self referral to accident and emergency department: patients' perceptions.

A study was conducted (a) to assess the number of patients registered with a south London general practice who over 11 weeks referred themselves to an accident and emergency department, (b) to identify the characteristics of those patients, and (c) to determine their perceptions of the services and resources available within their general practices and of the role of accident and emergency departments. Two hundred and thirty four patients referred themselves to a casualty department during the study period, of whom 217 (93%) were interviewed by means of a semistructured questionnaire. Of the 217 patients interviewed, only 15 had tried to contact their general practitioner before attending the casualty department. Eighty nine patients considered that their problem was urgent and required immediate attention and many that they would need an x ray examination. A substantial minority of patients thought that their doctor would not be available. It is concluded that patients'' perceptions of their problems and of access to their doctors are the main determinants of self referral to a casualty department. These findings have important implications for patient education.     

Edinburgh emergency asthma admission service.

In December 1968 an emergency service was set up in Edinburgh to enable patients with severe asthma to be admitted to hospital without delay. Up to 31 August 1975, 82 such patients had been admitted on 162 occasions, on 116 without the intervention of a general practitioner. The service is extended to patients particularly at risk of developing fatal asthma, and since it began no patient has died from asthma outside hospital. One patient, however, died from tension pneumothorax that developed after admission. We believe that similar services should be available throughout Britain.     

Evaluating chest pain in the emergency department.

Chest pain is one of the most difficult diagnostic problems for physicians working in an emergency department. In this setting, more malpractice dollars are awarded for missed myocardial infarction than for any other physician error. This problem usually occurs when the patient has atypical symptoms, the physician is inexperienced, or the diagnosis is not considered. The clinical manifestations of myocardial infarction vary greatly, and patients with "atypical" presentations have a poorer prognosis than those with classic symptoms. Although no feature of a patient''s history excludes infarction with certainty, pain that is sharp, positional, pleuritic, or reproduced by palpation indicates a lower probability of acute ischemic heart disease. New immunochemical methods and serial sampling strategies have increased the sensitivity of creatine kinase-MB as an indicator for the disorder. Recent investigations have also established the prognostic value of the initial electrocardiogram. These methods allow emergency physicians to assess the risk of complications and to perform triage when there is a shortage of beds in the coronary care unit. Emergency physicians must also consider other diseases for which coronary care might be beneficial.     

Bicycle-related injuries: a survey in a pediatric emergency department.

The number of bicycle-related injuries has risen significantly with the increased popularity of bicycle riding in Canada. The risk of injury is highest among children. To assess the magnitude of the problem and to identify the contributing factors we used a questionnaire, injury reports and patient charts to survey bicycle-related injuries among children brought to the emergency department of the Children''s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, between May 1 and Sept. 30, 1988. The questionnaire was completed for 517 (91%) of the 568 children; 70% were boys, and the mean age was 9.4 years. Only 2% of the patients had been wearing a helmet at the time of injury, although 13% claimed to own one for cycling. Over 60% of the accidents were attributable to carelessness or poor bicycle control; mechanical failure and environmental hazards were minor factors. Over 80% of the injuries occurred within a kilometre of the child''s home. Of the 97 children admitted to hospital 49% had head and skull injuries and 40% had limb fractures. Bicycle-related injuries represented 14.8% of all nonwinter (Apr. 1 to Oct. 31) trauma admissions among children 5 years or older. Our results further document bicycle-related injuries as an important childhood problem and underscore the need for improved safety measures.     

Syncope: Assessment of risk and an approach to evaluation in the emergency department and urgent care clinic

Syncope is among the most frequent forms of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC), and is characterized by a relatively brief and self-limited loss of consciousness that by definition is triggered by transient cerebral hypoperfusion. Most often, syncope is caused by a temporary drop of systemic arterial pressure below that required to maintain cerebral function, but brief enough not to cause permanent structural brain injury. Currently, approximately one-third of syncope/collapse patients seen in the emergency department (ED) or urgent care clinic are admitted to hospital for evaluation. The primary objective of developing syncope/TLOC risk stratification schemes is to provide guidance regarding the immediate prognostic risk of syncope patients presenting to the ED or clinic; thereafter, based on that risk assessment physicians may be better equipped to determine which patients can be safely evaluated as outpatients, and which require hospital care. In general, the need for hospitalization is determined by several key issues: i) the patient''s immediate (usually considered 1 week to 1 month) mortality risk and risk for physical injury (e.g., falls risk), ii) the patient''s ability to care for him/herself, and iii) whether certain treatments inherently require in-hospital initiation (e.g., pacemaker implantation). However, at present no single risk assessment protocol appears to be satisfactory for universal application, and development of a consensus recommendation is an essential next step.     

Patterns of local and tourist use of an emergency department.

Illness patterns of local and tourist patients in an emergency department of a medium-sized Ontario city with a single hospital were compared. Frequencies of specific and broad categories of ailments and rates of admission to the hospital were similar in the two groups. However, non-Canadian tourists were admitted to hospital at a much lower rate than Canadian tourists. Rates of visits to the emergency department within certain age categories were remarkably similar, as were rates within the sexes. It is concluded that, in view of the striking similarity in the illness pattern of a group of patients not professionally referred to the hospital and that of local patients, who have potential contact with a more extensive medical network, public attitudes, rather than availability of health professionals, determine the pattern of illness observed in an emergency department.     

SIRS评分预测急诊科抢救室病人预后的临床研究

目的探讨全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）评分对预测急诊科抢救室危重病人预后的意义。方法对急诊科抢救室救治的596例病人进行SIRS评分,分析不同SIRS评分病人的住院率、病死率,评价SIRS评分与病人住院率、病死率的相关性。结果随着SIRS分值的增加,病人住院率与病死率亦增加;SIRS评分≥2分时,病人住院率和病死率均明显增加,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。结论 SIRS评分系统作为一种简单的评分系统,能够初步预测急诊科抢救室危重病人的预后,具有一定的临床应用价值。     

Management of sudden bereavement in the accident and emergency department.

OBJECTIVE--To assess facilities available for the suddenly bereaved in accident and emergency departments and variations in care of bereaved relatives. DESIGN--Postal questionnaire survey. SETTING--England and Wales. SUBJECTS--All 98 accident and emergency departments treating over 50,000 patients a year, 78 of which replied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number of departments with specific facilities, staff training, and procedures for dealing with bereavement. RESULTS--60 hospitals had a specific room for bereaved relatives; the remainder used multipurpose rooms. In 49 hospitals relatives were taken to the room by a nurse with sole responsibility for caring for them. In 40 hospitals the nurse stayed with the relatives and 66 updated relatives on the patient''s condition. Facilities for viewing the body privately were poor, and relatives often had to ask to be left alone. 25 departments gave no written information on bereavement and only four routinely followed up relatives. Further training was requested by staff in 44 departments. CONCLUSIONS--Although facilities could be improved, immediate care of relatives is good. Care over subsequent weeks and preparation for this period is invariably inadequate.