Lentiviral Vif Degrades the APOBEC3Z3/APOBEC3H Protein of Its Mammalian Host and Is Capable of Cross-Species Activity

All lentiviruses except equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) use the small accessory protein Vif to counteract the restriction activity of the relevant APOBEC3 (A3) proteins of their host species. Prior studies have suggested that the Vif-A3 interaction is species specific. Here, using the APOBEC3H (Z3)-type proteins from five distinct mammals, we report that this is generally not the case: some lentiviral Vif proteins are capable of triggering the degradation of both the A3Z3-type protein of their normal host species and those of several other mammals. For instance, SIV_mac Vif can mediate the degradation of the human, macaque, and cow A3Z3-type proteins but not of the sheep or cat A3Z3-type proteins. Maedi-visna virus (MVV) Vif is similarly promiscuous, degrading not only sheep A3Z3 but also the A3Z3-type proteins of humans, macaques, cows, and cats. In contrast to the neutralization capacity of these Vif proteins, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV), and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) Vif appear specific to the A3Z3-type protein of their hosts. We conclude, first, that the Vif-A3Z3 interaction can be promiscuous and, second, despite this tendency, that each lentiviral Vif protein is optimized to degrade the A3Z3 protein of its mammalian host. Our results thereby suggest that the Vif-A3Z3 interaction is relevant to lentivirus biology.Lentiviruses are a unique class of complex retroviruses that encode a variety of accessory proteins in addition to the required Gag, Pol, and Env proteins. The archetypal lentivirus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), infects humans, but other members include simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV), maedi-visna virus (MVV), caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus (CAEV), equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV), and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), which infect monkeys, cattle, sheep, goats, horses, and cats, respectively. The HIV-1 accessory protein viral infectivity factor (Vif) has been extensively studied because of its essential function in inhibiting the cellular antiretroviral human APOBEC3G (A3G) protein (43). HIV-1 Vif binds to human A3G (and other A3 proteins) and serves as an adaptor to link it to an ELOC-based E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (30, 51, 52). A3G is then polyubiquitinated and degraded by the cellular proteasome (7, 15, 29, 30, 43, 46, 52).Due to the potential therapeutic value of disrupting this host-pathogen interaction, a significant amount of work has been invested in defining the important contact residues between A3G and HIV-1 Vif. Primate A3G homologs have been useful tools in this effort, as many fail to be neutralized by HIV-1 Vif despite a relatively high degree of sequence similarity. For example, while HIV-1 Vif effectively neutralizes human A3G, it does not neutralize African green monkey A3G or rhesus macaque A3G despite 77% and 75% identity, respectively (4, 26, 27, 41, 51). The differential capacity of the HIV-1 and SIV_agm Vif proteins to degrade the A3G proteins of their hosts led to demonstrations that residue 128 is a key determinant: D128 made each A3G protein susceptible to HIV-1 Vif and K128 made each A3G protein susceptible to SIV_agm Vif (4, 26, 41, 51). This apparent on/off switch led to the prevailing model that the Vif-A3 interaction is species specific. However, even early data sets showed at least two hints that the story was more complex. First, the identity of the A3G residue 128 (K or D) does not diminish the interaction with the Vif proteins of SIV_mac or HIV-2 (41, 51). Second, SIV_mac Vif was shown to potently counteract the A3G proteins from rhesus macaque (as expected) but also those from human, African green monkey, and chimpanzee (27). Therefore, the implication from these studies is that the full nature of the A3-Vif interaction has yet to be elucidated.Although A3G has clearly served as the prototype for understanding the A3-Vif interaction, a growing number of studies indicate that other A3s are also capable of restricting lentivirus replication and interacting with Vif. A3G is one of seven human A3 proteins (A3A to -H) encoded in tandem on chromosome 22 (7, 16, 49). All but A3A have been implicated in the restriction of HIV-1 replication (reviewed in references 1, 10, and 45). For instance, human A3H has been shown to restrict HIV-1 replication and is susceptible to degradation by HIV-1 Vif (8, 37, 47). A3H is a Z3-type DNA deaminase characterized by a conserved threonine and a valine, in addition to the canonical H-x₁-E-x_23-28-C-x_2-4-C zinc-coordinating motif (23). The Z3-type deaminase is unique in that only one copy exists in all mammals whose genomes have been sequenced. It is encoded by a five-exon gene located at the distal end of each mammal''s A3 locus (adjacent to CBX7). Additional observations suggest that the Z3-type deaminases appear to have the capacity to restrict the Vif-deficient lentiviruses of their hosts. For example, African green monkey A3H can restrict the replication of SIV_agm and is susceptible to degradation by SIV_agm Vif, and the cat A3Z3 can restrict the replication of FIV and is susceptible to degradation by FIV Vif (33, 37, 48).Here, we take advantage of the fact that all sequenced mammals have a single A3Z3-type protein to test the hypothesis that these proteins are of general relevance to lentivirus restriction and to clarify the species-specific nature of the mammalian A3Z3/lentiviral Vif relationship. First, we ask if human, rhesus macaque, cow, sheep, and cat A3Z3-type proteins are all capable of retrovirus restriction. Second, we ask whether they are susceptible to Vif-mediated degradation in a host-specific manner. We show that each lentiviral Vif protein can indeed neutralize the Z3-type A3 protein of its host species. However, we were surprised to find that several of the Vif proteins, particularly SIV_mac and MVV Vif, can neutralize a broad number of A3Z3 proteins irrespective of the species of origin and overall degree of similarity. These data indicate that the A3-Vif interaction is more promiscuous than previously appreciated. Such broad functional flexibility may be relevant to understanding past retroviral zoonoses and predicting potential future events. We conclude that the A3Z3-Vif interaction is conserved on a macroscopic level, consistent with an important role in viral replication and particularly in species like artiodactyls and felines with fewer A3 proteins.     

Multiple Vaccine-Elicited Nonneutralizing Antienvelope Antibody Activities Contribute to Protective Efficacy by Reducing both Acute and Chronic Viremia following Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIV89.6P Challenge in Rhesus Macaques

We have shown that following priming with replicating adenovirus type 5 host range mutant (Ad5hr)-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinants, boosting with gp140 envelope protein enhances acute-phase protection against intravenous simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)_89.6P challenge compared to results with priming and no boosting or boosting with an HIV polypeptide representing the CD4 binding site of gp120. We retrospectively analyzed antibodies in sera and rectal secretions from these same macaques, investigating the hypothesis that vaccine-elicited nonneutralizing antibodies contributed to the better protection. Compared to other immunized groups or controls, the gp140-boosted group exhibited significantly greater antibody activities mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI) in sera and transcytosis inhibition in rectal secretions. ADCC and ADCVI activities were directly correlated with antibody avidity, suggesting the importance of antibody maturation for functionality. Both ADCVI and percent ADCC killing prechallenge were significantly correlated with reduced acute viremia. The latter, as well as postchallenge ADCVI and ADCC, was also significantly correlated with reduced chronic viremia. We have previously demonstrated induction by the prime/boost regimen of mucosal antibodies that inhibit transcytosis of SIV across an intact epithelial cell layer. Here, antibody in rectal secretions was significantly correlated with transcytosis inhibition. Importantly, the transcytosis specific activity (percent inhibition/total secretory IgA and IgG) was strongly correlated with reduced chronic viremia, suggesting that mucosal antibody may help control cell-to-cell viral spread during the course of infection. Overall, the replicating Ad5hr-HIV/SIV priming/gp140 protein boosting approach elicited strong systemic and mucosal antibodies with multiple functional activities associated with control of both acute and chronic viremia.A major goal of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine development is the elicitation of protective antibodies capable of neutralizing the diversity of isolates in the worldwide pandemic (6, 61). Indeed, passively administered neutralizing antibodies have been shown to protect against pathogenic HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) challenge in rhesus macaque models (4, 44, 45, 57). However, the extent to which other antibody-mediated protective mechanisms impact HIV/SIV infection is still unclear. Whether these alternate biologic activities would augment vaccine-induced protection has not been definitively established.In HIV-infected individuals, as in SIV- or simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-infected rhesus macaques, systemic nonneutralizing antibodies appear early during acute infection, often preceding a neutralizing antibody response (21, 55). Although neutralizing antibody activity is critical for sterilizing immunity, recent studies suggest that antibodies may contribute to protection by other functional activities, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (20, 29), antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI) (22, 23), and transcytosis inhibition (19, 35, 59). Antibodies in secretions may directly block viral entry into intestinal and endocervical tissues by inhibiting transcytosis across epithelium, whereas local or serum-derived antibodies that mediate ADCC or ADCVI may exert protective effects by eliminating small foci of infected cells during the brief window of time that exists between transmission of virus across an epithelial cell barrier to the lamina propria and subsequent systemic spread (32). In support of this notion, mutation of the Fc portion of the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody, IgGb12, thereby preventing interaction with the FcγR on effector cells, rendered the antibody less able to mediate protection upon subsequent passive transfer and challenge of rhesus macaques (34). Thus, neutralizing antibodies themselves may mediate protection by additional functional activities.ADCC bridges innate and adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, it involves FcγR-bearing effector cells, such as NK cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and γδ T cells, and antibodies specific for antigens expressed on the surface of target cells. Upon interaction of these three components, the target cells are killed. Since the effector cells are not major histocompatibility complex restricted, ADCC is broadly applicable to diverse populations. Because the antibody specificity need not be restricted to neutralizing epitopes, ADCC may increase the breadth of antibody reactivity. In fact, we have shown that an HIV clade B immunization regimen elicited antibodies that mediated ADCC across several HIV clades (28). Antibodies that mediate ADCC have been shown to arise early in infection, before neutralizing antibodies (55, 60). They are present in the majority of infected individuals, and they have been associated with slow disease progression following both HIV and SIV infection (5, 8).ADCVI is closely related to ADCC, also requiring antibody that forms a bridge between an infected target cell and an FcγR-bearing effector cell (24). However, ADCVI is a broader activity not restricted solely to target cell lysis but, rather, encompassing several mechanisms by which viral replication following infection of target cells is inhibited. Thus, it may include ADCC activity but also involve noncytotoxic mechanisms of virus control, such as the secretion of inhibitory chemokines or FcγR-mediated phagocytosis of immune complexes (24, 25).Most HIV infections occur via a mucosal route, including cervicovaginal and rectal tissues (39, 52). Several nonmutually exclusive mechanisms for HIV-1 transmission across mucosal epithelia have been proposed (13, 56). Transcytosis of infectious virus across polarized columnar epithelial cells following contact of virally infected cells with apical epithelial cell surfaces is one mechanism for mucosal HIV entry (12). Rather than fusion and infection, interactions between the viral envelope proteins and epithelial surface molecules, such as glycosphingolipid galactosyl-ceramide (GalCer) (13, 47), an important component of endocytotic “raft” membrane microdomains, lead to transcytosis of the virus across the epithelial barrier and its trapping by submucosal dendritic cells which disseminate it to their target CD4⁺ T cells. Studies have shown that mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody, a major component of the mucosal immune response, could block mucosal HIV-1 entry via transcytosis in vitro (2, 19). Therefore, mucosal antibodies blocking adherence of virus to epithelial cells and preventing HIV-1 transcytosis across the epithelial barrier and subsequent CD4⁺ T cell infection may afford additional protection against HIV/SIV infection.We have been pursuing a replicating adenovirus (Ad)-HIV/SIV prime/protein subunit boost AIDS vaccine approach (30, 51), which has elicited strong, durable protection against HIV, SIV, and SHIV challenges (11, 18, 41, 42, 50). An underlying goal of these studies has been elucidation of immune responses that correlate with protective efficacy. Recently, we studied the contribution of novel protein boosts to immunogenicity and protective efficacy in a SHIV_89.6P model (49). Immunized rhesus macaques were primed with Ad type 5 host range mutant (Ad5hr)-HIV_89.6Pgp140, -SIV₂₃₉gag, and -SIV₂₃₉nef recombinants. One group was not boosted, one was boosted with HIV_89.6P gp140ΔCFI protein (gp140 envelope with deletions in the cleavage site, fusion peptide, and part of the interspace between the two heptad repeats) (40), and one was boosted with a novel HIV-1 polypeptide “peptomer” representing the CD4 binding site of the envelope (54). The best protection was seen in the gp140-boosted group, with significant reductions in both acute and chronic viremia. Although Env-specific antibody and cellular responses were readily detected, none directly correlated with the better protection. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies against SHIV_89.6P did not develop until 4 weeks postchallenge. Therefore, we hypothesized that vaccine-elicited nonneutralizing anti-Env antibodies might have contributed to the better control of acute and/or chronic viremia in the gp140 group. Here, we report retrospective evaluations of sera and rectal secretions from macaques in this comparative study for serum binding antibody avidity, an important characteristic of functional antibodies (38, 58), and nonneutralizing activities of systemic and mucosal antibodies, including ADCC, ADCVI, and transcytosis inhibition.     

Heavily Isotype-Dependent Protective Activities of Human Antibodies against Vaccinia Virus Extracellular Virion Antigen B5

Antibodies against the extracellular virion (EV or EEV) form of vaccinia virus are an important component of protective immunity in animal models and likely contribute to the protection of immunized humans against poxviruses. Using fully human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), we now have shown that the protective attributes of the human anti-B5 antibody response to the smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus) are heavily dependent on effector functions. By switching Fc domains of a single MAb, we have definitively shown that neutralization in vitro—and protection in vivo in a mouse model—by the human anti-B5 immunoglobulin G MAbs is isotype dependent, thereby demonstrating that efficient protection by these antibodies is not simply dependent on binding an appropriate vaccinia virion antigen with high affinity but in fact requires antibody effector function. The complement components C3 and C1q, but not C5, were required for neutralization. We also have demonstrated that human MAbs against B5 can potently direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity of vaccinia virus-infected cells. Each of these results was then extended to the polyclonal human antibody response to the smallpox vaccine. A model is proposed to explain the mechanism of EV neutralization. Altogether these findings enhance our understanding of the central protective activities of smallpox vaccine-elicited antibodies in immunized humans.The smallpox vaccine, live vaccinia virus (VACV), is frequently considered the gold standard of human vaccines and has been enormously effective in preventing smallpox disease. The smallpox vaccine led to the worldwide eradication of the disease via massive vaccination campaigns in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the greatest successes of modern medicine (30). However, despite the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine, the mechanisms of protection remain unclear. Understanding those mechanisms is key for developing immunologically sound vaccinology principles that can be applied to the design of future vaccines for other infectious diseases (3, 101).Clinical studies of fatal human cases of smallpox disease (variola virus infection) have shown that neutralizing antibody titers were either low or absent in patient serum (24, 68). In contrast, neutralizing antibody titers for the VACV intracellular mature virion (MV or IMV) were correlated with protection of vaccinees against smallpox (68). VACV immune globulin (VIG) (human polyclonal antibodies) is a promising treatment against smallpox (47), since it was able to reduce the number of smallpox cases ∼80% among variola-exposed individuals in four case-controlled clinical studies (43, 47, 52, 53, 69). In animal studies, neutralizing antibodies are crucial for protecting primates and mice against pathogenic poxviruses (3, 7, 17, 21, 27, 35, 61, 66, 85).The specificities and the functions of protective antipoxvirus antibodies have been areas of intensive research, and the mechanics of poxvirus neutralization have been debated for years. There are several interesting features and problems associated with the antibody response to variola virus and related poxviruses, including the large size of the viral particles and the various abundances of many distinct surface proteins (18, 75, 91, 93). Furthermore, poxviruses have two distinct virion forms, intracellular MV and extracellular enveloped virions (EV or EEV), each with a unique biology. Most importantly, MV and EV virions share no surface proteins (18, 93), and therefore, there is no single neutralizing antibody that can neutralize both virion forms. As such, an understanding of virion structure is required to develop knowledge regarding the targets of protective antibodies.Neutralizing antibodies confer protection mainly through the recognition of antigens on the surface of a virus. A number of groups have discovered neutralizing antibody targets of poxviruses in animals and humans (3). The relative roles of antibodies against MV and EV in protective immunity still remain somewhat unclear. There are compelling data that antibodies against MV (21, 35, 39, 66, 85, 90, 91) or EV (7, 16, 17, 36, 66, 91) are sufficient for protection, and a combination of antibodies against both targets is most protective (66). It remains controversial whether antibodies to one virion form are more important than those to the other (3, 61, 66). The most abundant viral particles are MV, which accumulate in infected cells and are released as cells die (75). Neutralization of MV is relatively well characterized (3, 8, 21, 35). EV, while less abundant, are critical for viral spread and virulence in vivo (93, 108). Neutralization of EV has remained more enigmatic (3).B5R (also known as B5 or WR187), one of five known EV-specific proteins, is highly conserved among different strains of VACV and in other orthopoxviruses (28, 49). B5 was identified as a protective antigen by Galmiche et al., and the available evidence indicated that the protection was mediated by anti-B5 antibodies (36). Since then, a series of studies have examined B5 as a potential recombinant vaccine antigen or as a target of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (1, 2, 7, 17, 40, 46, 66, 91, 110). It is known that humans immunized with the smallpox vaccine make antibodies against B5 (5, 22, 62, 82). It is also known that animals receiving the smallpox vaccine generate antibodies against B5 (7, 20, 27, 70). Furthermore, previous neutralization assays have indicated that antibodies generated against B5 are primarily responsible for neutralization of VACV EV (5, 83). Recently Chen at al. generated chimpanzee-human fusion MAbs against B5 and showed that the MAbs can protect mice from lethal challenge with virulent VACV (17). We recently reported, in connection with a study using murine monoclonal antibodies, that neutralization of EV is highly complement dependent and the ability of anti-B5 MAbs to protect in vivo correlated with their ability to neutralize EV in a complement-dependent manner (7).The focus of the study described here was to elucidate the mechanisms of EV neutralization, focusing on the human antibody response to B5. Our overall goal is to understand underlying immunobiological and virological parameters that determine the emergence of protective antiviral immune responses in humans.     

Isolation of Human Monoclonal Antibodies That Potently Neutralize Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Targeting Different Epitopes on the gH/gL/UL128-131A Complex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a widely circulating pathogen that causes severe disease in immunocompromised patients and infected fetuses. By immortalizing memory B cells from HCMV-immune donors, we isolated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies that neutralized at extremely low concentrations (90% inhibitory concentration [IC₉₀] values ranging from 5 to 200 pM) HCMV infection of endothelial, epithelial, and myeloid cells. With the single exception of an antibody that bound to a conserved epitope in the UL128 gene product, all other antibodies bound to conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex. Antibodies against gB, gH, or gM/gN were also isolated and, albeit less potent, were able to neutralize infection of both endothelial-epithelial cells and fibroblasts. This study describes unusually potent neutralizing antibodies against HCMV that might be used for passive immunotherapy and identifies, through the use of such antibodies, novel antigenic targets in HCMV for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting previously unknown neutralizing antibody responses.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the herpesvirus family which is widely distributed in the human population and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients and upon infection of the fetus. HCMV infection causes clinical disease in 75% of patients in the first year after transplantation (58), while primary maternal infection is a major cause of congenital birth defects including hearing loss and mental retardation (5, 33, 45). Because of the danger posed by this virus, development of an effective vaccine is considered of highest priority (51).HCMV infection requires initial interaction with the cell surface through binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (8) and possibly other surface receptors (12, 23, 64, 65). The virus displays a broad host cell range (24, 53), being able to infect several cell types such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells (including retinal cells), smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and dendritic cells (21, 37, 44, 54). Endothelial cell tropism has been regarded as a potential virulence factor that might influence the clinical course of infection (16, 55), whereas infection of leukocytes has been considered a mechanism of viral spread (17, 43, 44). Extensive propagation of HCMV laboratory strains in fibroblasts results in deletions or mutations of genes in the UL131A-128 locus (1, 18, 21, 36, 62, 63), which are associated with the loss of the ability to infect endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and leukocytes (15, 43, 55, 61). Consistent with this notion, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to UL128 or UL130 block infection of epithelial and endothelial cells but not of fibroblasts (63). Recently, it has been shown that UL128, UL130, and UL131A assemble with gH and gL to form a five-protein complex (thereafter designated gH/gL/UL128-131A) that is an alternative to the previously described gCIII complex made of gH, gL, and gO (22, 28, 48, 63).In immunocompetent individuals T-cell and antibody responses efficiently control HCMV infection and reduce pathological consequences of maternal-fetal transmission (13, 67), although this is usually not sufficient to eradicate the virus. Albeit with controversial results, HCMV immunoglobulins (Igs) have been administered to transplant patients in association with immunosuppressive treatments for prophylaxis of HCMV disease (56, 57), and a recent report suggests that they may be effective in controlling congenital infection and preventing disease in newborns (32). These products are plasma derivatives with relatively low potency in vitro (46) and have to be administered by intravenous infusion at very high doses in order to deliver sufficient amounts of neutralizing antibodies (4, 9, 32, 56, 57, 66).The whole spectrum of antigens targeted by HCMV-neutralizing antibodies remains poorly characterized. Using specific immunoabsorption to recombinant antigens and neutralization assays using fibroblasts as model target cells, it was estimated that 40 to 70% of the serum neutralizing activity is directed against gB (6). Other studies described human neutralizing antibodies specific for gB, gH, or gM/gN viral glycoproteins (6, 14, 26, 29, 34, 41, 52, 60). Remarkably, we have recently shown that human sera exhibit a more-than-100-fold-higher potency in neutralizing infection of endothelial cells than infection of fibroblasts (20). Similarly, CMV hyperimmunoglobulins have on average 48-fold-higher neutralizing activities against epithelial cell entry than against fibroblast entry (10). However, epitopes that are targeted by the antibodies that comprise epithelial or endothelial cell-specific neutralizing activity of human immune sera remain unknown.In this study we report the isolation of a large panel of human monoclonal antibodies with extraordinarily high potency in neutralizing HCMV infection of endothelial and epithelial cells and myeloid cells. With the exception of a single antibody that recognized a conserved epitope of UL128, all other antibodies recognized conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex.     

Balancing Reversion of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte and Neutralizing Antibody Escape Mutations within Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env upon Transmission

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope protein (Env) is subject to both neutralizing antibody (NAb) and CD8 T-cell (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte [CTL]) immune pressure. We studied the reversion of the Env CTL escape mutant virus to the wild type and the relationship between the reversion of CTL mutations with N-linked glycosylation site (NLGS)-driven NAb escape in pigtailed macaques. Env CTL mutations either did not revert to the wild type or only transiently reverted 5 to 7 weeks after infection. The CTL escape mutant reversion was coincident, for the same viral clones, with the loss of NLGS mutations. At one site studied, both CTL and NLGS mutations were needed to confer NAb escape. We conclude that CTL and NAb escape within Env can be tightly linked, suggesting opportunities to induce effective multicomponent anti-Env immunity.CD8 T-cell responses against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have long been observed to select for viral variants that avoid cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) recognition (2, 5, 15, 18, 27). These immune escape mutations may, however, result in reduced replication competence (“fitness cost”) (11, 20, 26). CTL escape variants have been shown to revert to the wild type (WT) upon passage to major histocompatibility complex-mismatched hosts, both in macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) or chimeric SIV/HIV (SHIV) infection (11, 12) and in humans with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection (1, 19).Most analyses of CTL escape and reversion have studied Gag CTL epitopes known to facilitate control of viremia (7, 14, 21, 30). Fewer analyses have studied Env-specific CTL epitopes. Recent sequencing studies suggest the potential for mutations within predicted HIV-1 Env-specific CTL epitopes to undergo reversion to the WT (16, 23). Env-specific CTL responses may, however, have less impact on viral control of both HIV-1 and SIV/SHIV than do Gag CTL responses (17, 24, 25), presumably reflecting either less-potent inhibition of viral replication or minimal fitness cost of escape (9).Serial viral escape from antibody pressure also occurs in both macaques and humans (3, 13, 28). Env is extensively glycosylated, and this “evolving glycan shield” can sterically block antibody binding without mutation at the antibody-binding site (8, 16, 31). Mutations at glycosylation sites, as well as other mutations, are associated with escape from neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses (4, 13, 29). Mutations in the amino acid sequences of N-linked glycosylation sites (NLGS) can alter the packing of the glycan cloud that surrounds the virion, by a loss, gain, or shift of an NLGS (32), thus facilitating NAb escape.Env is the only viral protein targeted by both CTL and NAb responses. The serial viral escape from both Env-specific CTL and NAb responses could have implications for viral fitness and the reversion of multiple mutations upon transmission to naïve hosts.We previously identified three common HIV-1 Env-specific CD8 T cell epitopes, RY8_788-795, SP9_110-118, and NL9_671-679, and their immune escape patterns in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) infected with SHIV_mn229 (25). SHIV_mn229 is a chimeric virus constructed from an SIV_mac239 backbone and an HIV-1_HXB2 env fragment that was passaged through macaques to become pathogenic (11). This earlier work provided an opportunity for detailed studies of how viruses with Env-specific CTL escape mutations, as well as mutations in adjacent NLGS, evolve when transmitted to naïve pigtail macaques.     

Pathogenic Hantaviruses Andes Virus and Hantaan Virus Induce Adherens Junction Disassembly by Directing Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Internalization in Human Endothelial Cells

Hantaviruses infect endothelial cells and cause 2 vascular permeability-based diseases. Pathogenic hantaviruses enhance the permeability of endothelial cells in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, the mechanism by which hantaviruses hyperpermeabilize endothelial cells has not been defined. The paracellular permeability of endothelial cells is uniquely determined by the homophilic assembly of vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) within adherens junctions, which is regulated by VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) responses. Here, we investigated VEGFR2 phosphorylation and the internalization of VE-cadherin within endothelial cells infected by pathogenic Andes virus (ANDV) and Hantaan virus (HTNV) and nonpathogenic Tula virus (TULV) hantaviruses. We found that VEGF addition to ANDV- and HTNV-infected endothelial cells results in the hyperphosphorylation of VEGFR2, while TULV infection failed to increase VEGFR2 phosphorylation. Concomitant with the VEGFR2 hyperphosphorylation, VE-cadherin was internalized to intracellular vesicles within ANDV- or HTNV-, but not TULV-, infected endothelial cells. Addition of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) or sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) to ANDV- or HTNV-infected cells blocked VE-cadherin internalization in response to VEGF. These findings are consistent with the ability of Ang-1 and S1P to inhibit hantavirus-induced endothelial cell permeability. Our results suggest that pathogenic hantaviruses disrupt fluid barrier properties of endothelial cell adherens junctions by enhancing VEGFR2-VE-cadherin pathway responses which increase paracellular permeability. These results provide a pathway-specific mechanism for the enhanced permeability of hantavirus-infected endothelial cells and suggest that stabilizing VE-cadherin within adherens junctions is a primary target for regulating endothelial cell permeability during pathogenic hantavirus infection.Hantaviruses cause 2 human diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) (50). HPS and HFRS are multifactorial in nature and cause thrombocytopenia, immune and endothelial cell responses, and hypoxia, which contribute to disease (7, 11, 31, 42, 62). Although these syndromes sound quite different, they share common components which involve the ability of hantaviruses to infect endothelial cells and induce capillary permeability. Edema, which results from capillary leakage of fluid into tissues and organs, is a common finding in both HPS and HFRS patients (4, 7, 11, 31, 42, 62). In fact, both diseases can present with renal or pulmonary sequelae, and the renal or pulmonary focus of hantavirus diseases is likely to result from hantavirus infection of endothelial cells within vast glomerular and pulmonary capillary beds (4, 7, 11, 31, 42, 62). All hantaviruses predominantly infect endothelial cells which line capillaries (31, 42, 44, 61, 62), and endothelial cells have a primary role in maintaining fluid barrier functions of the vasculature (1, 12, 55). Although hantaviruses do not lyse endothelial cells (44, 61), this primary cellular target underlies hantavirus-induced changes in capillary integrity. As a result, understanding altered endothelial cell responses following hantavirus infection is fundamental to defining the mechanism of permeability induced by pathogenic hantaviruses (1, 12, 55).Pathogenic, but not nonpathogenic, hantaviruses use β₃ integrins on the surface of endothelial cells and platelets for attachment (19, 21, 23, 39, 46), and β₃ integrins play prominent roles in regulating vascular integrity (3, 6, 8, 24, 48). Pathogenic hantaviruses bind to basal, inactive conformations of β₃ integrins (35, 46, 53) and days after infection inhibit β₃ integrin-directed endothelial cell migration (20, 46). This may be the result of cell-associated virus (19, 20, 22) which keeps β₃ in an inactive state but could also occur through additional regulatory processes that have yet to be defined. Interestingly, the nonpathogenic hantaviruses Prospect Hill virus (PHV) and Tula virus (TULV) fail to alter β₃ integrin functions, and their entry is consistent with the use of discrete α₅β₁ integrins (21, 23, 36).On endothelial cells, α_vβ₃ integrins normally regulate permeabilizing effects of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) (3, 24, 48, 51). VEGF was initially identified as an edema-causing vascular permeability factor (VPF) that is 50,000 times more potent than histamine in directing fluid across capillaries (12, 14). VEGF is responsible for disassembling adherens junctions between endothelial cells to permit cellular movement, wound repair, and angiogenesis (8, 10, 12, 13, 17, 26, 57). Extracellular domains of β₃ integrins and VEGFR2 reportedly form a coprecipitable complex (3), and knocking out β₃ causes capillary permeability that is augmented by VEGF addition (24, 47, 48). Pathogenic hantaviruses inhibit β₃ integrin functions days after infection and similarly enhance the permeability of endothelial cells in response to VEGF (22).Adherens junctions form the primary fluid barrier of endothelial cells, and VEGFR2 responses control adherens junction disassembly (10, 17, 34, 57, 63). Vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) is an endothelial cell-specific adherens junction protein and the primary determinant of paracellular permeability within the vascular endothelium (30, 33, 34). Activation of VEGFR2, another endothelial cell-specific protein, triggers signaling responses resulting in VE-cadherin disassembly and endocytosis, which increases the permeability of endothelial cell junctions (10, 12, 17, 34). VEGF is induced by hypoxic conditions and released by endothelial cells, platelets, and immune cells (2, 15, 38, 52). VEGF acts locally on endothelial cells through the autocrine or paracrine activation of VEGFR2, and the disassembly of endothelial cell adherens junctions increases the availability of nutrients to tissues and facilitates leukocyte trafficking and diapedesis (10, 12, 17, 55). The importance of endothelial cell barrier integrity is often in conflict with requirements for endothelial cells to move in order to permit angiogenesis and repair or cell and fluid egress, and as a result, VEGF-induced VE-cadherin responses are tightly controlled (10, 17, 18, 32, 33, 59). This limits capillary permeability while dynamically responding to a variety of endothelial cell-specific factors and conditions. However, if unregulated, this process can result in localized capillary permeability and edema (2, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 29, 60).Interestingly, tissue edema and hypoxia are common findings in both HPS and HFRS patients (11, 31, 62), and the ability of pathogenic hantaviruses to infect human endothelial cells provides a means for hantaviruses to directly alter normal VEGF-VE-cadherin regulation. In fact, the permeability of endothelial cells infected by pathogenic Andes virus (ANDV) or Hantaan virus (HTNV) is dramatically enhanced in response to VEGF addition (22). This response is absent from endothelial cells comparably infected with the nonpathogenic TULV and suggests that enhanced VEGF-induced endothelial cell permeability is a common underlying response of both HPS- and HFRS-causing hantaviruses (22). In these studies, we comparatively investigate responses of human endothelial cells infected with pathogenic ANDV and HTNV, as well as nonpathogenic TULV.     

Preexisting Infection with Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 2 neither Exacerbates nor Attenuates Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac251 Infection in Macaques

Coinfection with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has been reported to have either a slowed disease course or to have no effect on progression to AIDS. In this study, we generated a coinfection animal model and investigated whether HTLV-2 could persistently infect macaques, induce a T-cell response, and impact simian immunodeficiency virus SIV_mac251-induced disease. We found that inoculation of irradiated HTLV-2-infected T cells into Indian rhesus macaques elicited humoral and T-cell responses to HTLV-2 antigens at both systemic and mucosal sites. Low levels of HTLV-2 provirus DNA were detected in the blood, lymphoid tissues, and gastrointestinal tracts of infected animals. Exposure of HTLV-2-infected or naïve macaques to SIV_mac251 demonstrated comparable levels of SIV_mac251 viral replication, similar rates of mucosal and peripheral CD4⁺ T-cell loss, and increased T-cell proliferation. Additionally, neither the magnitude nor the functional capacity of the SIV-specific T-cell-mediated immune response was different in HTLV-2/SIV_mac251 coinfected animals versus SIV_mac251 singly infected controls. Thus, HTLV-2 targets mucosal sites, persists, and importantly does not exacerbate SIV_mac251 infection. These data provide the impetus for the development of an attenuated HTLV-2-based vectored vaccine for HIV-1; this approach could elicit persistent mucosal immunity that may prevent HIV-1/SIV_mac251 infection.Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) was discovered in 1982 and recognized as the second human retrovirus found (29). HTLV-2 is closely related to the first human retrovirus discovered, HTLV-1 (49, 50)_, a pathogenic virus that causes adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) and an inflammatory neurologic disorder called HTLV-1-associated myelopathy or tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) (22, 45).HTLV-2 is prevalent in Amerindian populations of North and South America and in Africa (57). The prevalence of HTLV-2 is generally low; however, in the past 20 years, an epidemic of HTLV-2 infection has occurred among intravenous drug users (8, 24, 54, 57). HTLV-2 establishes a lifelong infection and replicates at low levels in most infected individuals. While anecdotal cases of TSP/HAM-like neurological manifestations (1, 44) and hematopoietic diseases, such as large granular lymphoma (LGL), in HTLV-2-infected individuals have been reported (3, 37-39, 46), the extent to which HTLV-2 can induce disease in humans remains unclear. Indeed, even in the condition of immune deficiency, such as infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), HTLV-2 coinfection has not been reported to be associated with cancer or neurological diseases. However, more studies are necessary to fully understand the role of HTLV-2 in human disease. While HTLV-1 infection has been connected with an accelerated course of disease in HIV-1 coinfected patients (2, 34), HTLV-2 has been reported to either have no effect (26) or suggested to exert a potential protective role during HIV-1 infection (12, 23). This protective role is thought to be due to a maintenance of CD4⁺ T cells, lowering immune activation, and delayed progression to AIDS (4, 5). In addition, modulation of cytokine and chemokine networks by HTLV-2 has been suggested to contribute to the control of HIV-1 infection (12, 36, 47). Since studies on the immunological interactions between HIV-1 and HTLV-2 have been performed in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HTLV-2 in the chronic phase of HIV-1 disease, little is known about the effects of HTLV-2 infection during acute HIV-1 replication, mucosal CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, or HIV-1-specific immune responses. Furthermore, the potential protective effect of an HTLV-2 vector that would target both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and induce a low-grade persistent infection makes HTLV-2 an interesting potential vaccine platform for an HIV-1 vaccine.Current HIV-1 vaccine strategies have focused on viral vectors delivering HIV-1 antigens. These vectors stimulate strong, systemic antigen-specific responses but are unable to protect from infection, since they generate only limited mucosal responses and do not persist. The only vaccine approach that has conferred protection in the simian immunodeficiency virus SIV_mac251 macaque model is a live attenuated virus (17), suggesting that persistent expression of viral antigens in mucosal and lymphoid tissues may be necessary. An HTLV-2 vector expressing HIV-1 antigens at mucosal sites that stimulates and maintains T-cell responses in the gut may confer protection from infection by quickly eliminating cells infected by the founder virus at the portal of entry. This study establishes that the Indian rhesus macaque model for HTLV-2 infection is a suitable model to test this hypothesis, as it demonstrates that HTLV-2 targets systemic, lymphoid, as well as mucosal tissues of rhesus macaques. HTLV-2 infection induces humoral as well as cell-mediated immune responses, and importantly, T-cell responses can be found at both systemic and mucosal sites. In this study, we demonstrate that the viral and T-cell dynamics of macaques dually infected with HTLV-2 and SIV_mac251 are similar to those of macaques singly infected with SIV_mac251.     

Multi-Low-Dose Mucosal Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac239 Challenge of Cynomolgus Macaques Immunized with “Hyperattenuated” SIV Constructs

Hyperattenuated simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239-derived constructs Δ5-CMV and Δ6-CCI are an effort to render SIV incapable of, in practical terms, both reversion and recombination while maintaining the immune features of SIV as a retrovirus. Primary inoculation of cynomolgus macaques with 10⁸ 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID₅₀) of Δ5-CMV or Δ6-CCI induced low-level humoral and cellular responses detectable in the absence of measureable in vivo replication. The first of three DNA boosts resulted in elevated gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) responses to Gag, Pol, and Env in the Δ5-CMV vaccine group compared to the Δ6-CCI vaccine group (P = 0.001). Weekly intrarectal challenge with a low dose of SIVmac239 followed by a dose escalation was conducted until all animals became infected. The mean peak viral load of the Δ5-CMV-vaccinated animals (3.7 × 10⁵ copies/ml) was ∼1 log unit lower than that of the control animals. More dramatically, the viral load set point of these animals was decreased by 3 log units compared to that of the controls (<50 versus 1.64 × 10⁴ copies/ml; P < 0.0001). Seventy-five percent (6/8) of vaccine recipients controlled virus below 1,000 copies/ml for at least 6 months, with a subset controlling virus and maintaining substantial CD4 T-cell counts for close to 2 years of follow-up. The correlates of protection from SIV disease progression may lie in the rapidity and protective value of immune responses that occur early in primary SIV infection. Prior immunization with hyperattenuated SIVmac239, even if sterilizing immunity is not achieved, may allow a more advantageous host response.To date, the most promising approach to inducing sterilizing immunity in the macaque model has been through the use of live attenuated virus (LAV) vaccines based on simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). A major advantage of an attenuated virus strategy for the development of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine is the ability of attenuated viruses to induce broad and persistent immunity (29, 51). In particular, SIV strains engineered with deletions of nef (SIVΔnef) have afforded the most significant protection upon challenge with pathogenic SIV (13, 14, 29, 60, 65, 72). Numerous SIV-derived live attenuated vaccine models have been developed, many of which employ deletions in the viral accessory genes (3, 12, 14, 15, 25, 29, 30, 53, 64, 72). In many cases, vaccinations have been shown to substantially decrease viral burden during the acute phase of infection, maintain low to undetectable levels of virus during the chronic phase of infection, and limit the progression to AIDS. Although promising, a major caveat to the live attenuated virus vaccine approach is the potential for compensatory reversion and the observations that incompletely attenuated viruses may harbor residual pathogenicity (5, 10, 14). Even SIV constructs containing multiple deletions in nef, vpr, and the negative regulatory element (NRE) can cause AIDS-like disease in adult macaques and particularly in neonates (4, 5, 27, 53). This may be analogous to some human long-term nonprogressors infected by nef-deleted HIV variants in whom a slowly increasing viral burden has been accompanied by disease progression (22, 34, 37). Additional mutations can be engineered into vaccine vectors to generate highly attenuated viruses, but this often comes at the expense of their protective efficacy (8, 23, 30).We previously made two series of novel live attenuated SIV vaccine models (25) in which the simplified SIV constructs retain all the structural viral proteins but have inactivating mutations for all viral accessory genes. These constructs retain significant antigenicity, without the pathogenic effects associated with accessory viral factors, thus limiting or eliminating the potential for reversion (25).Whether administered parenterally or mucosally, conventional challenge trials in macaques have often utilized artificially high single-dose inocula in an effort to ensure that most, if not all, of the naive or placebo-immunized animal subjects become infected following a single exposure. The rationale for using a single massive challenge has been reconsidered in light of the possibility that vaccines with protective efficacy under physiologic challenge conditions may not identified. This practice is now being replaced by an approach designed to better approximate the relatively low in vivo acquisition rates following a single sexual exposure to HIV (21, 45, 69) and should provide a more realistic assessment of vaccine efficacy in “real-world” situations. Importantly, recent studies using this approach have demonstrated viremia of magnitude and kinetics comparable to that seen following single high-dose mucosal inocula (47), and this approach has been used successfully in more recent challenge trials (31, 70). Here we are assessing the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of two hyperattenuated SIV vaccine candidates following a multi-low-dose intrarectal challenge with highly pathogenic SIVmac239 in the cynomolgus macaque model.SIV-specific humoral immune responses were assessed at various time points postvaccination and postchallenge by Western blotting. Cellular immunogenicity was monitored by evaluation of peripheral T-cell responses (via gamma interferon [IFN-γ] enzyme-linked immunospot [ELISPOT] assay) following stimulation with peptide pools spanning the entire SIVmac239 proteome. The protective efficacy of the different vaccine candidates was assessed by classical endpoints, such as quantitative analysis of plasma viral load, quantitative immunophenotyping of lymphocytes, and clinical markers of disease progression. Even using extremely attenuated SIV constructs with only minimal evidence of replication, a modest immune response that can impact long-term disease progression is generated.     

Mutations within a Conserved Region of the Hepatitis C Virus E2 Glycoprotein That Influence Virus-Receptor Interactions and Sensitivity to Neutralizing Antibodies

Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 glycoprotein have been widely reported. We identify here a single mutation (N415D) in E2 that arose during long-term passaging of HCV strain JFH1-infected cells. This mutation was located within E2 residues 412 to 423, a highly conserved region that is recognized by several broadly neutralizing antibodies, including the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33. Introduction of N415D into the wild-type (WT) JFH1 genome increased the affinity of E2 to the CD81 receptor and made the virus less sensitive to neutralization by an antiserum to another essential entry factor, SR-BI. Unlike JFH1_WT, the JFH1_N415D was not neutralized by AP33. In contrast, it was highly sensitive to neutralization by patient-derived antibodies, suggesting an increased availability of other neutralizing epitopes on the virus particle. We included in this analysis viruses carrying four other single mutations located within this conserved E2 region: T416A, N417S, and I422L were cell culture-adaptive mutations reported previously, while G418D was generated here by growing JFH1_WT under MAb AP33 selective pressure. MAb AP33 neutralized JFH1_T416A and JFH1_I422L more efficiently than the WT virus, while neutralization of JFH1_N417S and JFH1_G418D was abrogated. The properties of all of these viruses in terms of receptor reactivity and neutralization by human antibodies were similar to JFH1_N415D, highlighting the importance of the E2 412-423 region in virus entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV), which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, has a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome encoding a polyprotein that is cleaved by cellular and viral proteases to yield mature structural and nonstructural proteins. The structural proteins consist of core, E1 and E2, while the nonstructural proteins are p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B (42). The hepatitis C virion comprises the RNA genome surrounded by the structural proteins core (nucleocapsid) and E1 and E2 (envelope glycoproteins). The HCV glycoproteins lie within a lipid envelope surrounding the nucleocapsid and play a major role in HCV entry into host cells (21). The development of retrovirus-based HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) (3) and the cell culture infectious clone JFH1 (HCVcc) (61) has provided powerful tools to study HCV entry.HCV entry is initiated by the binding of virus particles to attachment factors which are believed to be glycosaminoglycans (2), low-density lipoprotein receptor (41), and C-type lectins such as DC-SIGN and L-SIGN (12, 37, 38). Upon attachment at least four entry factors are important for particle internalization. These include CD81 (50), SR-BI (53) and the tight junction proteins claudin-1 (15) and occludin (6, 36, 51).CD81, a member of the tetraspanin family, is a cell surface protein with various functions including tissue differentiation, cell-cell adhesion and immune cell maturation (34). It consists of a small and a large extracellular loop (LEL) with four transmembrane domains. Viral entry is dependent on HCV E2 binding to the LEL of CD81 (3, 50). The importance of HCV glycoprotein interaction with CD81 is underlined by the fact that many neutralizing antibodies compete with CD81 and act in a CD81-blocking manner (1, 5, 20, 45).SR-BI is a multiligand receptor expressed on liver cells and on steroidogenic tissue. It binds to high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) (31). The SR-BI binding site is mapped to the hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) of HCV E2 (53). SR-BI ligands, such as HDL and oxidized LDL have been found to affect HCV infectivity (4, 14, 58-60). Indeed, HDL has been shown to enhance HCV infection in an SR-BI-dependent manner (4, 14, 58, 59). Antibodies against SR-BI and knockdown of SR-BI in cells result in a significant inhibition of viral infection in both the HCVpp and the HCVcc systems (5, 25, 32).Although clearly involved in entry and immune recognition, the more downstream function(s) of HCV glycoproteins are poorly understood, as their structure has not yet been solved. Nonetheless, mutational analysis and mapping of neutralizing antibody epitopes have delineated several discontinuous regions of E2 that are essential for HCV particle binding and entry (24, 33, 45, 47). One of these is a highly conserved sequence spanning E2 residues 412 to 423 (QLINTNGSWHIN). Several broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) bind to this epitope. These include mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33, rat MAb 3/11, and the human MAbs e137, HCV1, and 95-2 (8, 16, 44, 45, 49). Of these, MAbs AP33, 3/11, and e137 are known to block the binding of E2 to CD81.Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the HCV glycoproteins are valuable for investigating the virus interaction(s) with cellular receptors (18). In the present study, we characterize an asparagine-to-aspartic acid mutation at residue 415 (N415D) in HCV strain JFH1 E2 that arose during the long-term passaging of infected human hepatoma Huh-7 cells. Alongside N415D, we also characterize three adjacent cell culture adaptive mutations reported previously and a novel substitution generated in the present study by propagating virus under MAb AP33 selective pressure to gain further insight into the function of this region of E2 in viral infection.     

Conserved Motifs within Ebola and Marburg Virus VP40 Proteins Are Important for Stability,Localization, and Subsequent Budding of Virus-Like Particles

The filovirus VP40 protein is capable of budding from mammalian cells in the form of virus-like particles (VLPs) that are morphologically indistinguishable from infectious virions. Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) contains well-characterized overlapping L domains, which play a key role in mediating efficient virus egress. L domains represent only one component required for efficient budding and, therefore, there is a need to identify and characterize additional domains important for VP40 function. We demonstrate here that the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ sequence of eVP40 and the corresponding ₈₄LPLGIM₈₉ sequence of Marburg virus VP40 (mVP40) are critical for efficient release of VP40 VLPs. Indeed, deletion of these motifs essentially abolished the ability of eVP40 and mVP40 to bud as VLPs. To address the mechanism by which the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 contributes to egress, a series of point mutations were introduced into this motif. These mutants were then compared to the eVP40 wild type in a VLP budding assay to assess budding competency. Confocal microscopy and gel filtration analyses were performed to assess their pattern of intracellular localization and ability to oligomerize, respectively. Our results show that mutations disrupting the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif resulted in both altered patterns of intracellular localization and self-assembly compared to wild-type controls. Interestingly, coexpression of either Ebola virus GP-WT or mVP40-WT with eVP40-ΔLPLGVA failed to rescue the budding defective eVP40-ΔLPLGVA mutant into VLPs; however, coexpression of eVP40-WT with mVP40-ΔLPLGIM successfully rescued budding of mVP40-ΔLPLGIM into VLPs at mVP40-WT levels. In sum, our findings implicate the LPLGVA and LPLGIM motifs of eVP40 and mVP40, respectively, as being important for VP40 structure/stability and budding.Ebola and Marburg viruses are members of the family Filoviridae. Filoviruses are filamentous, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that cause lethal hemorrhagic fevers in both humans and nonhuman primates (5). Filoviruses encode seven viral proteins including: NP (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (phosphoprotein), VP40 (matrix protein), GP (glycoprotein), VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24 (secondary matrix protein), and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) (2, 5, 10, 12, 45). Numerous studies have shown that expression of Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) alone in mammalian cells leads to the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) with filamentous morphology which is indistinguishable from infectious Ebola virus particles (12, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 49). Like many enveloped viruses such as rhabdovirus (11) and arenaviruses (44), Ebola virus encodes late-assembly or L domains, which are sequences required for the membrane fission event that separates viral and cellular membranes to release nascent virion particles (1, 5, 7, 10, 12, 18, 25, 27, 34). Thus far, four classes of L domains have been identified which were defined by their conserved amino acid core sequences: the Pro-Thr/Ser-Ala-Pro (PT/SAP) motif (25, 27), the Pro-Pro-x-Tyr (PPxY) motif (11, 12, 18, 19, 41, 53), the Tyr-x-x-Leu (YxxL) motif (3, 15, 27, 37), and the Phe-Pro-Ile-Val (FPIV) motif (39). Both PTAP and the PPxY motifs are essential for efficient particle release for eVP40 (25, 27, 48, 49), whereas mVP40 contains only a PPxY motif. L domains are believed to act as docking sites for the recruitment of cellular proteins involved in endocytic trafficking and multivesicular body biogenesis to facilitate virus-cell separation (8, 13, 14, 16, 28, 29, 33, 36, 43, 50, 51).In addition to L domains, oligomerization, and plasma-membrane localization of VP40 are two functions of the protein that are critical for efficient budding of VLPs and virions. Specific sequences involved in self-assembly and membrane localization have yet to be defined precisely. However, recent reports have attempted to identify regions of VP40 that are important for its overall function in assembly and budding. For example, the amino acid region ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ located at the C-terminal region was found to be important for efficient release of eVP40 VLPs, with Leu₂₁₃ being the most critical (30). Mutation of the ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ region resulted in altered patterns of cellular localization and oligomerization of eVP40 compared to those of the wild-type genotype (30). In addition, the proline at position 53 was also implicated as being essential for eVP40 VLP release and plasma-membrane localization (54).In a more recent study, a YPLGVG motif within the M protein of Nipah virus (NiV) was shown to be important for stability, membrane binding, and budding of NiV VLPs (35). Whether this NiV M motif represents a new class of L domain remains to be determined. However, it is clear that this YPLGVG motif of NiV M is important for budding, perhaps involving a novel mechanism (35). Our rationale for investigating the corresponding, conserved motifs present within the Ebola and Marburg virus VP40 proteins was based primarily on these findings with NiV. In addition, Ebola virus VP40 motif maps close to the hinge region separating the N- and C-terminal domains of VP40 (4). Thus, the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 is predicted to be important for the overall stability and function of VP40 during egress. Findings presented here indicate that disruption of these filovirus VP40 motifs results in a severe defect in VLP budding, due in part to impairment in overall VP40 structure, stability and/or intracellular localization.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Elite Neutralizers: Individuals with Broad and Potent Neutralizing Activity Identified by Using a High-Throughput Neutralization Assay together with an Analytical Selection Algorithm

The development of a rapid and efficient system to identify human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals with broad and potent HIV-1-specific neutralizing antibody responses is an important step toward the discovery of critical neutralization targets for rational AIDS vaccine design. In this study, samples from HIV-1-infected volunteers from diverse epidemiological regions were screened for neutralization responses using pseudovirus panels composed of clades A, B, C, and D and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs). Initially, 463 serum and plasma samples from Australia, Rwanda, Uganda, the United Kingdom, and Zambia were screened to explore neutralization patterns and selection ranking algorithms. Samples were identified that neutralized representative isolates from at least four clade/CRF groups with titers above prespecified thresholds and ranked based on a weighted average of their log-transformed neutralization titers. Linear regression methods selected a five-pseudovirus subset, representing clades A, B, and C and one CRF01_AE, that could identify top-ranking samples with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) neutralization titers of ≥100 to multiple isolates within at least four clade groups. This reduced panel was then used to screen 1,234 new samples from the Ivory Coast, Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States, and 1% were identified as elite neutralizers. Elite activity is defined as the ability to neutralize, on average, more than one pseudovirus at an IC₅₀ titer of 300 within a clade group and across at least four clade groups. These elite neutralizers provide promising starting material for the isolation of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to assist in HIV-1 vaccine design.Since the identification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) as the cause of AIDS, one of the greatest challenges has been the development of a vaccine that will prevent infection and/or ameliorate disease progression (38, 43). Although over 100 phase I, II, and III vaccine clinical trials of different candidates have been conducted all over the world, only a few candidates have advanced to efficacy testing and none has yet to show any benefit in prevention or control of HIV-1 (HIV Vaccine Database; www.iavi.org). In other viral diseases (such as polio, influenza, and measles), neutralizing antibodies are generated as part of either the natural immune response to infection or the response to immunization, and their role in protective immunity is well established (10, 12, 15, 22, 37, 42, 45, 47, 49, 52). For HIV-1, studies in animal models indicate that both broadly neutralizing antibodies and cell-mediated responses may be required to provide vaccine protection (7, 14, 16, 20, 29, 31, 33, 34, 39, 53). Unlike many other viruses, HIV-1 is highly variable, with multiple subtypes and recombinant forms circulating in different regions of the world. This high level of HIV-1 genetic variability, particularly in the envelope glycoproteins (gp120 and gp41), has been one of the greatest obstacles in development of a safe and effective HIV-1 vaccine and in particular in the elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies. In addition, HIV-1 has other mechanisms of immune escape preventing elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies, including the heavy glycosylation of the envelope glycoproteins, instability of such glycoproteins, and conformational masking of receptor-binding sites (6, 25, 32).Despite the enormous diversity of HIV-1, a relatively small number of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs) have been isolated, providing evidence that broad neutralization by single antibody specificities can be achieved (3-5, 8, 9, 17, 21, 23, 24, 29, 35, 36, 40, 41, 44, 50, 51, 55). Structures for such bnMAbs have been determined in complex with HIV-1 Env (26, 54) and provide starting points for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies. However, since there are only a few such bnMAbs, we established a global program as part of International AIDS Vaccine Initiative''s (IAVI''s) Neutralizing Antibody Consortium (6), aimed at screening HIV-1⁺ subjects with the goal of identifying individuals with broad and potent neutralizing activities as a potential source of novel bnMAbs, with an emphasis placed on individuals infected with non-clade B viruses. This paper describes the screening algorithm implemented to successfully identify HIV-1⁺ subjects with broadly neutralizing antibodies, including a subset of individuals termed “elite neutralizers.” These volunteers will be studied further to characterize the specificities of serum antibodies and will provide source materials for isolation of bnMAbs.     

Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Matrix Binding to Membranes and Nucleic Acids

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) matrix (MA) protein targets HIV-1 precursor Gag (PrGag) proteins to assembly sites at plasma membrane (PM) sites that are enriched in cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂]. MA is myristoylated, which enhances membrane binding, and specifically binds PI(4,5)P₂ through headgroup and 2′ acyl chain contacts. MA also binds nucleic acids, although the significance of this association with regard to the viral life cycle is unclear. We have devised a novel MA binding assay and used it to examine MA interactions with membranes and nucleic acids. Our results indicate that cholesterol increases the selectivity of MA for PI(4,5)P₂-containing membranes, that PI(4,5)P₂ binding tolerates 2′ acyl chain variation, and that the MA myristate enhances membrane binding efficiency but not selectivity. We also observed that soluble PI(4,5)P₂ analogues do not compete effectively with PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes for MA binding but surprisingly do increase nonspecific binding to liposomes. Finally, we have demonstrated that PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes successfully outcompete nucleic acids for MA binding, whereas other liposomes do not. These results support a model in which RNA binding protects MA from associating with inappropriate cellular membranes prior to PrGag delivery to PM assembly sites.The matrix (MA) domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) precursor Gag (PrGag) protein serves several functions in the viral replication cycle. One essential function is to target PrGag proteins to their assembly sites at the plasma membranes (PMs) of infected cells (4, 5, 11, 16, 25, 29, 30, 33, 35, 39, 43-45, 47, 50, 54, 56, 57). A second function is the recruitment of the viral surface/transmembrane (SU/TM; also referred to as gp120/gp41) envelope (Env) protein complex into virions (14, 15, 18, 19, 27, 51-53). In addition to these activities, numerous reports have attributed nucleic acid binding properties to retroviral MAs (24, 38, 47), and with some viruses MA appears to serve in an encapsidation capacity (24). While no encapsidation role has been assigned for HIV-1 MA, experiments have shown that MA can substitute for the HIV-1 nucleocapsid (NC) protein assembly function (38) under some circumstances, presumably by virtue of its facility to concentrate PrGag proteins by binding them to RNAs (38).A number of structural studies have been conducted on HIV-1 MA (1, 22, 41, 42, 49). The protein is N terminally myristoylated and composed of six α helices, capped by a three-strand β sheet (7, 22, 41, 42, 49). The protein trimerizes in solution and in crystals (22, 28, 49) and recently has been shown to organize as hexamers of trimers on lipid membranes (1). The membrane binding face of HIV-1 MA is basic, fostering its ability to associate with negatively charged phospholipid headgroups (1, 22, 30, 41, 42, 49). The importance of such an interaction has been underscored in molecular genetic experiments which demonstrated that depletion of PM phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂] reduced the assembly efficiency of HIV-1 (9, 36). Consistent with these observations, HIV-1 MA preferentially binds to soluble PI(4,5)P₂ mimics through contacts with the headgroup and 2′ acyl chain, and binding promotes exposure of the MA myristate group and protein oligomerization (17, 21, 40-43, 46). However, PI(4,5)P₂ is not the only lipid to demonstrate an association with HIV-1. In particular, HIV-1 appears to assemble at cholesterol-rich PM sites, cholesterol is highly enriched in HIV-1 virions, and cholesterol depletion reduces viral infectivity (2, 6, 8, 20, 23, 26, 31, 34, 37). The HIV-1 lipidome shows additional differences from the PM lipids of infected cells (2, 5, 8), suggesting that other lipids could affect PrGag-membrane binding or virus assembly site selection.To gain a better understanding of the functions and interactions of HIV-1 MA, we have examined the liposome and nucleic acid binding properties of purified myristoylated MA. Using liposome flotation assays and a novel liposome bead binding assay, we have demonstrated that the PI(4,5)P₂ binding specificity of MA is enhanced by cholesterol, that protein myristoylation increases membrane binding efficiency but not specificity, and that 2′ acyl chain variation is compatible with PI(4,5)P₂ binding. We also examined whether soluble PI(4,5)P₂ mimics could compete with liposomes for MA binding. Surprisingly, we found that soluble mimics not only failed to compete with PI(4,5)P₂ liposomes but also increased MA binding to membranes that do not contain acidic phospholipids. Finally, we have observed that while MA does bind nucleic acids, nucleic acid binding is outcompeted by PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes. Our results suggest models for PrGag-membrane and RNA association and the HIV-1 assembly pathway.     

Andes Virus Recognition of Human and Syrian Hamster β3 Integrins Is Determined by an L33P Substitution in the PSI Domain

Andes virus (ANDV) causes a fatal hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in humans and Syrian hamsters. Human α_vβ₃ integrins are receptors for several pathogenic hantaviruses, and the function of α_vβ₃ integrins on endothelial cells suggests a role for α_vβ₃ in hantavirus directed vascular permeability. We determined here that ANDV infection of human endothelial cells or Syrian hamster-derived BHK-21 cells was selectively inhibited by the high-affinity α_vβ₃ integrin ligand vitronectin and by antibodies to α_vβ₃ integrins. Further, antibodies to the β₃ integrin PSI domain, as well as PSI domain polypeptides derived from human and Syrian hamster β₃ subunits, but not murine or bovine β₃, inhibited ANDV infection of both BHK-21 and human endothelial cells. These findings suggest that ANDV interacts with β₃ subunits through PSI domain residues conserved in both Syrian hamster and human β₃ integrins. Sequencing the Syrian hamster β₃ integrin PSI domain revealed eight differences between Syrian hamster and human β₃ integrins. Analysis of residues within the PSI domains of human, Syrian hamster, murine, and bovine β₃ integrins identified unique proline substitutions at residues 32 and 33 of murine and bovine PSI domains that could determine ANDV recognition. Mutagenizing the human β₃ PSI domain to contain the L33P substitution present in bovine β₃ integrin abolished the ability of the PSI domain to inhibit ANDV infectivity. Conversely, mutagenizing either the bovine PSI domain, P33L, or the murine PSI domain, S32P, to the residue present human β₃ permitted PSI mutants to inhibit ANDV infection. Similarly, CHO cells transfected with the full-length bovine β₃ integrin containing the P33L mutation permitted infection by ANDV. These findings indicate that human and Syrian hamster α_vβ₃ integrins are key receptors for ANDV and that specific residues within the β₃ integrin PSI domain are required for ANDV infection. Since L33P is a naturally occurring human β₃ polymorphism, these findings further suggest the importance of specific β₃ integrin residues in hantavirus infection. These findings rationalize determining the role of β₃ integrins in hantavirus pathogenesis in the Syrian hamster model.Hantaviruses persistently infect specific small mammal hosts and are spread to humans by the inhalation of aerosolized excreted virus (41, 42). Hantaviruses predominantly infect endothelial cells and cause one of two vascular leak-based diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) (41). Hantavirus diseases are characterized by increased vascular permeability and acute thrombocytopenia in the absence of endothelial cell lysis (36, 41, 42, 54). In general, hantaviruses are not spread from person to person; however, the Andes hantavirus (ANDV) is an exception, since there are several reports of person-to-person transmission of ANDV infection (11, 37, 47, 52). ANDV is also unique in its ability to cause an HPS-like disease in Syrian hamsters and serves as the best-characterized hantavirus disease model with a long onset, symptoms, and pathogenesis nearly identical to that of HPS patients (20, 21, 50).Hantavirus infection of the endothelium alters endothelial cell barrier functions through direct and immunological responses (8, 14). Although the means by which hantaviruses cause pulmonary edema or hemorrhagic disease has been widely conjectured, the mechanisms by which hantaviruses elicit pathogenic human responses have yet to be defined. Hantaviruses coat the surface of infected VeroE6 cells days after infection (17), and this further suggests that dynamic hantavirus interactions with immune and endothelial cells are likely to contribute to viral pathogenesis. Hantavirus pathogenesis has been suggested to involve CD8⁺ T cells, tumor necrosis factor alpha or other cytokines, viremia, and the dysregulation of β₃ integrins (7, 8, 13-16, 25-28, 32, 34, 38, 44-46). However, these responses have not been demonstrated to contribute to hantavirus pathogenesis, and in some cases there are conflicting data on their involvement (18, 25-28, 34, 35, 44, 45, 48). Immune complex deposition clearly contributes to HFRS patient disease and renal sequelae (4, 7), but it is unclear what triggers vascular permeability in HPS and HFRS diseases or why hemorrhage occurs in HFRS patients but not in HPS patients (8, 36, 54). Acute thrombocytopenia is common to both diseases, and platelet dysfunction resulting from defective platelet aggregation is reported in HFRS patients (7, 8).Pathogenic hantaviruses have in common their ability to interact with α_IIbβ₃ and α_vβ₃ integrins present on platelets and endothelial cells (13, 16), and β₃ integrins have primary roles in regulating vascular integrity (1, 2, 6, 19, 22, 39, 40). Consistent with the presence of cell surface displayed virus (17), pathogenic hantaviruses uniquely block α_vβ₃ directed endothelial cell migration and enhance endothelial cell permeability for 3 to 5 days postinfection (14, 15). Pathogenic hantaviruses dysregulate β₃ integrin functions by binding domains present at the apex of inactive β₃ integrin conformers (38). α_vβ₃ forms a complex with vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and normally regulates VEGF-directed endothelial cell permeability (2, 3, 10, 39, 40). However, both β₃ integrin knockouts and hantavirus-infected endothelial cells result in increased VEGF-induced permeability, presumably by disrupting VEGFR2-β₃ integrin complex formation (2, 14, 19, 39, 40). This suggests that at least one means for hantaviruses to increase vascular permeability occurs through interactions with β₃ integrins that are required for normal platelet and endothelial cell functions.α_vβ₃ and α_IIbβ₃ integrins exist in two conformations: an active extended conformation where the ligand binding head domain is present at the apex of the heterodimer and a basal, inactive bent conformation where the globular head of the integrin is folded toward the cell membrane (30, 53, 55). Pathogenic HTN and NY-1 hantaviruses bind to the N-terminal plexin-semaphorin-integrin (PSI) domain of β₃ integrin subunits and are selective for bent, inactive α_vβ₃ integrin conformers (38). Pathogenic hantavirus binding to inactive α_vβ₃ integrins is consistent with the selective inhibitory effect of hantaviruses on α_vβ₃ function and endothelial cell permeability (14, 15, 38). Although the mechanism of hantavirus induced vascular permeability has yet to be defined, there is a clear role for β₃ integrin dysfunction in vascular permeability deficits (5, 6, 22, 29, 39, 40, 51) which make an understanding of hantavirus interactions with β₃ subunits important for both entry and disease processes.The similarity between HPS disease in humans and Syrian hamsters (20, 21) suggests that pathogenic mechanisms of ANDV disease are likely to be coincident. Curiously, other hantaviruses (Sin Nombre virus [SNV] and Hantaan virus [HTNV]) are restricted in Syrian hamsters and fail to cause disease in this animal, even though they are prominent causes of human disease (50). Although the host range restriction for SNV and HTNV in Syrian hamsters has not been defined (33), the pathogenesis of ANDV in Syrian hamsters suggests that both human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins may similarly be used by ANDV and contribute to pathogenesis.We demonstrate here that ANDV infection of the Syrian hamster BHK-21 cell line and human endothelial cells is dependent on α_vβ₃ and inhibited by α_vβ₃ specific ligands and antibodies. Further, polypeptides expressing the N-terminal 53 residues of human and Syrian hamster β₃ subunits block ANDV infection. This further indicates that ANDV interaction with the N-terminal 53 residues of both human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins is required for viral entry. We also demonstrate that ANDV recognition of human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins is determined by proline substitutions at residues 32/33 within the β₃ integrin PSI domain. These results define unique ANDV interactions with human and Syrian hamster β₃ integrins.