c-Type Cytochrome Assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Key Residue for Apocytochrome c1/Lyase Interaction

The electron transport chains in the membranes of bacteria and organelles generate proton-motive force essential for ATP production. The c-type cytochromes, defined by the covalent attachment of heme to a CXXCH motif, are key electron carriers in these energy-transducing membranes. In mitochondria, cytochromes c and c₁ are assembled by the cytochrome c heme lyases (CCHL and CC₁HL) and by Cyc2p, a putative redox protein. A cytochrome c₁ mutant with a CAPCH heme-binding site instead of the wild-type CAACH is strictly dependent upon Cyc2p for assembly. In this context, we found that overexpression of CC₁HL, as well as mutations of the proline in the CAPCH site to H, L, S, or T residues, can bypass the absence of Cyc2p. The P mutation was postulated to shift the CXXCH motif to an oxidized form, which must be reduced in a Cyc2p-dependent reaction before heme ligation. However, measurement of the redox midpoint potential of apocytochrome c₁ indicates that neither the P nor the T residues impact the thermodynamic propensity of the CXXCH motif to occur in a disulfide vs. dithiol form. We show instead that the identity of the second intervening residue in the CXXCH motif is key in determining the CCHL-dependent vs. CC₁HL-dependent assembly of holocytochrome c₁. We also provide evidence that Cyc2p is dedicated to the CCHL pathway and is not required for the CC₁HL-dependent assembly of cytochrome c₁.THE c-type cytochromes, also referred to as cytochrome c, represent a universal class of heme-containing proteins that function as electron carriers in the energy-transducing pathways of bacteria, plastids, and mitochondria (Thöny-Meyer 1997; Nakamoto et al. 2000; Bonnard et al. 2010). Because cytochromes c carry a heme covalently attached to a CXXCH motif, they constitute an attractive object of study to address the question of cofactor protein assembly. The biochemical requirements for cytochrome c assembly were deduced from in vivo and in vitro studies, and the conclusion is that both apocytochromes c and heme are transported independently across at least one biological membrane and maintained as reduced prior to catalysis of the heme attachment reaction (Allen et al. 2003; Hamel et al. 2009; Kranz et al. 2009; Sanders et al. 2010). Bacterial cytochromes c are assembled in the periplasmic space, a compartment where cysteine pairs in proteins form disulfide bonds in reactions catalyzed by dedicated enzymes (Inaba 2009; Kadokura and Beckwith 2010). The current thinking holds that a c-type apocytochrome is a substrate of the disulfide bond-forming pathway, which introduces an intramolecular disulfide between the two cysteines of the CXXCH sequence (Allen et al. 2003; Sanders et al. 2010). This disulfide needs to be reduced to a dithiol to provide free sulfhydryls for the heme ligation. Consistent with this view is the fact that groups of specific oxido-reductases that constitute a transmembrane dithiol-disulfide relay from the cytosol to the periplasmic space have been shown to function as c-type cytochrome assembly factors (Allen et al. 2003; Kadokura et al. 2003; Mapller and Hederstedt 2006; Sanders et al. 2010). The proposal that the components of this pathway control the in vivo redox status of the CXXCH sulfhydryls has been inferred from the presence of motifs in their protein sequences that are consistent with a function in redox chemistry and also from the demonstration that their recombinant forms participate in dithiol–disulfide exchange reactions (Monika et al. 1997; Setterdahl et al. 2000). Moreover, the ability of exogenous thiol compounds to bypass the lack of these factors in vivo substantiates the view that the redox components have a disulfide-reducing activity in the pathway (e.g., Sambongi and Ferguson 1994; Fabianek et al. 1998; Beckett et al. 2000; Deshmukh et al. 2000; Bardischewsky and Friedrich 2001; Erlendsson and Hederstedt 2002; Erlendsson et al. 2003; Feissner et al. 2005; Turkarslan et al. 2008).While the role of these pathways is well established in bacteria, much less is known about the components that catalyze thiol/disulfide chemistry in the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS), which is topologically equivalent to the bacterial periplasm. By analogy with the bacterial pathways, the participation of redox-active factors that catalyze thiol formation is expected, as the mitochondrial IMS houses two c-type cytochromes, the soluble cytochrome c and the membrane-bound cytochrome c₁, both of which function in respiration. In fungi, heme attachment to apocytochromes c and c₁ is dependent upon the IMS resident cytochrome c and c₁ heme lyases, CCHL and CC₁HL, although the exact role of these lyases in the assembly process is still unclear (Dumont et al. 1987; Zollner et al. 1992). Conversion of apocytochrome to holocytochrome c depends only on CCHL, while apocytochrome c₁ can be acted upon by both CCHL and CC₁HL (Matner and Sherman 1982; Dumont et al. 1987; Stuart et al. 1990; Zollner et al. 1992; Bernard et al. 2003). In animals, apoforms of cytochromes c and c₁ are assembled by a unique heme lyase, HCCS, which carries both the CCHL and CC₁HL activities (Prakash et al. 2002; Schwarz and Cox 2002; Bernard et al. 2003).Cyc2p, a component first described as a mitochondrial biogenesis factor in yeast (Matner and Sherman 1982; Dumont et al. 1993; Pearce et al. 1998; Sanchez et al. 2001), was recently rediscovered in the context of cytochrome c₁ maturation (Bernard et al. 2003). Cyc2p is located at the mitochondrial inner membrane with its C-terminal domain containing a non-covalently bound FAD exposed to the IMS (Bernard et al. 2005). A redox function for Cyc2p is likely based on the finding that a recombinant form of the molecule exhibits a NAD(P)H-dependent reductase activity (Bernard et al. 2005). However, as Cyc2p activity is not essential for the maturation process, a functional redundancy was postulated based on the fact that a cyc2-null mutant still assembles holoforms of cytochromes c and c₁ (Bernard et al. 2005). The absolute requirement of Cyc2p was revealed via genetic analysis of the cyc2-null cyt1-34 combination that displays a synthetic respiratory-deficient phenotype with loss of holocytochrome c₁ assembly (Bernard et al. 2005). The cyt1-34 mutation maps to the gene encoding cytochrome c₁ and results in a CAPCH heme-binding site replacing the wild-type CAACH site (Bernard et al. 2005). The synthetic interaction is specific for the cyt1-34 allele carrying the A-to-P mutation and is not observed in a cyc2-null cyt1-48 strain carrying an A-to-D mutation at the heme-binding site of apocytochrome c₁ (Bernard et al. 2005). The fact that Cyc2p becomes essential when the cytochrome c₁ heme-binding site carries an A-to-P mutation suggests that the CXXCH motif could be the target of Cyc2p action in vivo. One possible interpretation for this observation is that the P residue alters the reactivity of the cysteinyl thiols to redox chemistry so that the apocytochrome c₁ CAPCH heme-binding site occurs in an oxidized (disulfide) form, which must be reduced in a Cyc2p-dependent reaction before heme attachment can occur.In this article, we have undertaken a genetic approach to elucidate this pathway and searched for suppressors that alleviate the respiratory deficiency of the cyc2-null cyt1-34 strain. Either overexpression of CC₁HL or replacement of the P mutation in the heme-binding site by H, L, S, or T residues restore the assembly of holocytochrome c₁. In vitro measurement of redox potential of apoforms of CA(A/P/T)CH cytochrome c₁ indicates that there is no change in the thermodynamic stability of the disulfide at the CXXCH motif that could account for the Cyc2p-dependent assembly of cytochrome c₁. Genetic studies reveal that the replacement of the second A residue at the CAACH motif by H, L, P, S, and T residues is key in determining the conversion of apocytochrome c₁ to its corresponding holoform via the CCHL and/or CC₁HL-dependent pathway. We also demonstrate that Cyc2p is a component dedicated to the CCHL pathway and is not required for the CC₁HL-dependent assembly of cytochrome c₁. We propose that the CAPCH cytochrome c₁ is strictly dependent upon CCHL and Cyc2p for its assembly but becomes a substrate of CC₁HL upon overexpression of CC₁HL or in the presence of H, L, S, or T mutations.     

Telomerase Recruitment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Not Dependent on Tel1-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdc13

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, association between the Est1 telomerase subunit and the telomere-binding protein Cdc13 is essential for telomerase to be recruited to its site of action. A current model proposes that Tel1 binding to telomeres marks them for elongation, as the result of phosphorylation of a proposed S/TQ cluster in the telomerase recruitment domain of Cdc13. However, three observations presented here argue against one key aspect of this model. First, the pattern of Cdc13 phosphatase-sensitive isoforms is not altered by loss of Tel1 function or by mutations introduced into two conserved serines (S249 and S255) in the Cdc13 recruitment domain. Second, an interaction between Cdc13 and Est1, as monitored by a two-hybrid assay, is dependent on S255 but Tel1-independent. Finally, a derivative of Cdc13, cdc13–(S/TQ)₁₁→(S/TA)₁₁, in which every potential consensus phosphorylation site for Tel1 has been eliminated, confers nearly wild-type telomere length. These results are inconsistent with a model in which the Cdc13–Est1 interaction is regulated by Tel1-mediated phosphorylation of the Cdc13 telomerase recruitment domain. We propose an alternative model for the role of Tel1 in telomere homeostasis, which is based on the assumption that Tel1 performs the same molecular task at double-strand breaks (DSBs) and chromosome termini.TELOMERE length homeostasis is a highly regulated process that must balance telomere loss (as the result of incomplete replication and/or nucleolytic degradation) with telomeric repeat addition (through the action of telomerase and/or recombination). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a key regulatory event is recruitment of telomerase to chromosome ends by the telomere end-binding protein Cdc13 (Nugent et al. 1996; Evans and Lundblad 1999; Pennock et al. 2001; Bianchi et al. 2004; Chan et al. 2008). Recruitment relies on a direct interaction between Cdc13 and the Est1 subunit of telomerase (Pennock et al. 2001), which brings the catalytic core of the enzyme to its site of action. Disruption of this interaction, due to mutations in either CDC13 (cdc13-2) or EST1 (est1-60), results in an Est (ever-shorter-telomere) phenotype, as manifested by progressive telomere shortening and an eventual senescence phenotype. The recruitment activity of Cdc13, which resides in a 15-kDa N-terminal domain (Pennock et al. 2001), is sufficient to direct telomerase even to nontelomeric sites (Bianchi et al. 2004). As predicted by the recruitment model, association of telomerase with telomeres is greatly reduced in strains expressing the recruitment-defective cdc13-2 allele (Chan et al. 2008).Telomerase action at individual telomeres is highly regulated. Using an assay that monitors telomere addition at single nucleotide resolution (single telomere extension, STEX), Lingner and colleagues showed that only ∼7% of telomeres with wild-type (i.e., 300 bp) length are elongated by telomerase during a single cell cycle (Teixeira et al. 2004). However, as telomere length declines, the extension frequency increases: ∼20% of telomeres 200 bp in length and >40% of 100-bp-long telomeres are elongated (Teixeira et al. 2004; Arneric and Lingner 2007). The mechanism by which telomerase distinguishes short from long telomeres has been the subject of intense investigation. Work from a number of laboratories has led to the proposal that Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Cdc13 at underelongated telomeres mediates the interaction between Cdc13 and the telomerase-associated Est1 protein, thus ensuring that telomerase is directed to the shortest telomeres in a population. In support of this model, the Est1 and Est2 telomerase subunits exhibit enhanced association with telomeres that have been artificially shortened, whereas Cdc13 displays length-independent association with telomeres (Bianchi and Shore 2007; Sabourin et al. 2007). This suggests that the preferential elongation of shorter telomeres is controlled at the level of recruitment of the telomerase holoenzyme by Cdc13. Furthermore, efficient association of Est1 and Est2 with chromosome ends requires Tel1 and Mre11 (which acts in the same pathway as Tel1 for telomere length regulation; Nugent et al. 1998; Ritchie and Petes 2000) but not Mec1 (Takata et al. 2005; Goudsouzian et al. 2006). Tel1 itself is also telomere bound (Takata et al. 2004), with enhanced binding to shorter telomeres (Bianchi and Shore 2007; Hector et al. 2007; Sabourin et al. 2007; Abdallah et al. 2009), although there is considerable controversy over the degree and timing of Tel1 association with chromosome termini during the cell cycle. As expected for a key regulator of the interaction between Cdc13 and a telomerase subunit, a tel1-Δ strain has short telomeres (Lustig and Petes 1986), although telomere length is not impaired enough to confer the Est phenotype displayed by cdc13-2 and est1-60 strains.Implicit in the above proposal is that Cdc13 must be a direct substrate of Tel1. In support of this, Teng and colleagues reported several years ago that the recruitment domain of Cdc13 has a cluster of potential Tel1 (and/or Mec1) phosphorylation sites (Tseng et al. 2006). Substrates of the DNA damage kinases often contain several closely spaced phosphorylation sites, termed S/TQ cluster domains (SCDs), which are considered a structural hallmark of many DNA damage-response proteins (Traven and Heierhorst 2005). On the basis of in vitro kinase assays with GST fusions to 75- to 90-amino-acid portions of the Cdc13 recruitment domain, Tseng et al. 2006 concluded that four SQ sites in the recruitment domain of Cdc13 are overlapping substrates for both Tel1 and Mec1, leading to the proposal that telomerase recruitment in S. cerevisiae is regulated by Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Cdc13.The above model makes a key prediction: in a tel1-Δ strain, telomerase should no longer exhibit a length-dependent pattern of elongation. However, preferential elongation of short telomeres still occurs at native chromosome ends in the absence of Tel1 (Arneric and Lingner 2007). In addition, Petes and colleagues have argued, on the basis of epistasis data, that Tel1 performs an indirect role in the telomerase pathway, rather than directly targeting a telomerase regulator (Ritchie et al. 1999; Ritchie and Petes 2000). These observations are not easily explained, if preferential recognition of short telomeres by telomerase is mediated by Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Cdc13. In this current study, we have re-examined the evidence for phosphorylation of Cdc13 as a regulatory mechanism for telomere length homeostasis. We report on a series of observations that indicate that Tel1 contributes to telomere length control through a mechanism other than phosphorylation of the Cdc13 S/TQ cluster.     

Remodeling of the Rad51 DNA Strand-Exchange Protein by the Srs2 Helicase

Homologous recombination is associated with the dynamic assembly and disassembly of DNA–protein complexes. Assembly of a nucleoprotein filament comprising ssDNA and the RecA homolog, Rad51, is a key step required for homology search during recombination. The budding yeast Srs2 DNA translocase is known to dismantle Rad51 filament in vitro. However, there is limited evidence to support the dismantling activity of Srs2 in vivo. Here, we show that Srs2 indeed disrupts Rad51-containing complexes from chromosomes during meiosis. Overexpression of Srs2 during the meiotic prophase impairs meiotic recombination and removes Rad51 from meiotic chromosomes. This dismantling activity is specific for Rad51, as Srs2 Overexpression does not remove Dmc1 (a meiosis-specific Rad51 homolog), Rad52 (a Rad51 mediator), or replication protein A (RPA; a single-stranded DNA-binding protein). Rather, RPA replaces Rad51 under these conditions. A mutant Srs2 lacking helicase activity cannot remove Rad51 from meiotic chromosomes. Interestingly, the Rad51-binding domain of Srs2, which is critical for Rad51-dismantling activity in vitro, is not essential for this activity in vivo. Our results suggest that a precise level of Srs2, in the form of the Srs2 translocase, is required to appropriately regulate the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament dynamics during meiosis.     

Integrity and Function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spindle Pole Body Depends on Connections Between the Membrane Proteins Ndc1, Rtn1, and Yop1

The nuclear envelope in Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbors two essential macromolecular protein assemblies: the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) that enable nucleocytoplasmic transport, and the spindle pole bodies (SPBs) that mediate chromosome segregation. Previously, based on metazoan and budding yeast studies, we reported that reticulons and Yop1/DP1 play a role in the early steps of de novo NPC assembly. Here, we examined if Rtn1 and Yop1 are required for SPB function in S. cerevisiae. Electron microscopy of rtn1Δ yop1Δ cells revealed lobular abnormalities in SPB structure. Using an assay that monitors lateral expansion of the SPB central layer, we found that rtn1Δ yop1Δ SPBs had decreased connections to the NE compared to wild type, suggesting that SPBs are less stable in the NE. Furthermore, large budded rtn1Δ yop1Δ cells exhibited a high incidence of short mitotic spindles, which were frequently misoriented with respect to the mother–daughter axis. This correlated with cytoplasmic microtubule defects. We found that overexpression of the SPB insertion factors NDC1, MPS2, or BBP1 rescued the SPB defects observed in rtn1Δ yop1Δ cells. However, only overexpression of NDC1, which is also required for NPC biogenesis, rescued both the SPB and NPC associated defects. Rtn1 and Yop1 also physically interacted with Ndc1 and other NPC membrane proteins. We propose that NPC and SPB biogenesis are altered in cells lacking Rtn1 and Yop1 due to competition between these complexes for Ndc1, an essential common component of both NPCs and SPBs.     

DNA Replication Checkpoint Signaling Depends on a Rad53–Dbf4 N-Terminal Interaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) are essential to initiate DNA replication at individual origins. During replication stress, the S-phase checkpoint inhibits the DDK- and CDK-dependent activation of late replication origins. Rad53 kinase is a central effector of the replication checkpoint and both binds to and phosphorylates Dbf4 to prevent late-origin firing. The molecular basis for the Rad53–Dbf4 physical interaction is not clear but occurs through the Dbf4 N terminus. Here we found that both Rad53 FHA1 and FHA2 domains, which specifically recognize phospho-threonine (pT), interacted with Dbf4 through an N-terminal sequence and an adjacent BRCT domain. Purified Rad53 FHA1 domain (but not FHA2) bound to a pT Dbf4 peptide in vitro, suggesting a possible phospho-threonine-dependent interaction between FHA1 and Dbf4. The Dbf4–Rad53 interaction is governed by multiple contacts that are separable from the Cdc5- and Msa1-binding sites in the Dbf4 N terminus. Importantly, abrogation of the Rad53–Dbf4 physical interaction blocked Dbf4 phosphorylation and allowed late-origin firing during replication checkpoint activation. This indicated that Rad53 must stably bind to Dbf4 to regulate its activity.     

DNA Replication Error-Induced Extinction of Diploid Yeast

Genetic defects in DNA polymerase accuracy, proofreading, or mismatch repair (MMR) induce mutator phenotypes that accelerate adaptation of microbes and tumor cells. Certain combinations of mutator alleles synergistically increase mutation rates to levels that drive extinction of haploid cells. The maximum tolerated mutation rate of diploid cells is unknown. Here, we define the threshold for replication error-induced extinction (EEX) of diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Double-mutant pol3 alleles that carry mutations for defective DNA polymerase-δ proofreading (pol3-01) and accuracy (pol3-L612M or pol3-L612G) induce strong mutator phenotypes in heterozygous diploids (POL3/pol3-01,L612M or POL3/pol3-01,L612G). Both pol3-01,L612M and pol3-01,L612G alleles are lethal in the homozygous state; cells with pol3-01,L612M divide up to 10 times before arresting at random stages in the cell cycle. Antimutator eex mutations in the pol3 alleles suppress this lethality (pol3-01,L612M,eex or pol3-01,L612G,eex). MMR defects synergize with pol3-01,L612M,eex and pol3-01,L612G,eex alleles, increasing mutation rates and impairing growth. Conversely, inactivation of the Dun1 S-phase checkpoint kinase suppresses strong pol3-01,L612M,eex and pol3-01,L612G,eex mutator phenotypes as well as the lethal pol3-01,L612M phenotype. Our results reveal that the lethal error threshold in diploids is 10 times higher than in haploids and likely determined by homozygous inactivation of essential genes. Pronounced loss of fitness occurs at mutation rates well below the lethal threshold, suggesting that mutator-driven cancers may be susceptible to drugs that exacerbate replication errors.     

The Anaphase Promoting Complex Regulates Yeast Lifespan and rDNA Stability by Targeting Fob1 for Degradation

Genomic stability, stress response, and nutrient signaling all play critical, evolutionarily conserved roles in lifespan determination. However, the molecular mechanisms coordinating these processes with longevity remain unresolved. Here we investigate the involvement of the yeast anaphase promoting complex (APC) in longevity. The APC governs passage through M and G1 via ubiquitin-dependent targeting of substrate proteins and is associated with cancer and premature aging when defective. Our two-hybrid screen utilizing Apc5 as bait recovered the lifespan determinant Fob1 as prey. Fob1 is unstable specifically in G1, cycles throughout the cell cycle in a manner similar to Clb2 (an APC target), and is stabilized in APC (apc5^CA) and proteasome (rpn10∆) mutants. Deletion of FOB1 increased replicative lifespan (RLS) in wild type (WT), apc5^CA, and apc10∆ cells, and suppressed apc5^CA cell cycle progression and rDNA recombination defects. Alternatively, increased FOB1 expression decreased RLS in WT cells, but did not reduce the already short apc5^CA RLS, suggesting an epistatic interaction between apc5^CA and fob1∆. Mutation to a putative L-Box (Fob1^E420V), a Destruction Box-like motif, abolished Fob1 modifications, stabilized the protein, and increased rDNA recombination. Our work provides a mechanistic role played by the APC to promote replicative longevity and genomic stability in yeast.     

The Mechanism of Nucleotide Excision Repair-Mediated UV-Induced Mutagenesis in Nonproliferating Cells

Following the irradiation of nondividing yeast cells with ultraviolet (UV) light, most induced mutations are inherited by both daughter cells, indicating that complementary changes are introduced into both strands of duplex DNA prior to replication. Early analyses demonstrated that such two-strand mutations depend on functional nucleotide excision repair (NER), but the molecular mechanism of this unique type of mutagenesis has not been further explored. In the experiments reported here, an ade2 adeX colony-color system was used to examine the genetic control of UV-induced mutagenesis in nondividing cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We confirmed a strong suppression of two-strand mutagenesis in NER-deficient backgrounds and demonstrated that neither mismatch repair nor interstrand crosslink repair affects the production of these mutations. By contrast, proteins involved in the error-prone bypass of DNA damage (Rev3, Rev1, PCNA, Rad18, Pol32, and Rad5) and in the early steps of the DNA-damage checkpoint response (Rad17, Mec3, Ddc1, Mec1, and Rad9) were required for the production of two-strand mutations. There was no involvement, however, for the Pol η translesion synthesis DNA polymerase, the Mms2-Ubc13 postreplication repair complex, downstream DNA-damage checkpoint factors (Rad53, Chk1, and Dun1), or the Exo1 exonuclease. Our data support models in which UV-induced mutagenesis in nondividing cells occurs during the Pol ζ-dependent filling of lesion-containing, NER-generated gaps. The requirement for specific DNA-damage checkpoint proteins suggests roles in recruiting and/or activating factors required to fill such gaps.     

Fertility and Polarized Cell Growth Depends on eIF5A for Translation of Polyproline-Rich Formins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

eIF5A is an essential and evolutionary conserved translation elongation factor, which has recently been proposed to be required for the translation of proteins with consecutive prolines. The binding of eIF5A to ribosomes occurs upon its activation by hypusination, a modification that requires spermidine, an essential factor for mammalian fertility that also promotes yeast mating. We show that in response to pheromone, hypusinated eIF5A is required for shmoo formation, localization of polarisome components, induction of cell fusion proteins, and actin assembly in yeast. We also show that eIF5A is required for the translation of Bni1, a proline-rich formin involved in polarized growth during shmoo formation. Our data indicate that translation of the polyproline motifs in Bni1 is eIF5A dependent and this translation dependency is lost upon deletion of the polyprolines. Moreover, an exogenous increase in Bni1 protein levels partially restores the defect in shmoo formation seen in eIF5A mutants. Overall, our results identify eIF5A as a novel and essential regulator of yeast mating through formin translation. Since eIF5A and polyproline formins are conserved across species, our results also suggest that eIF5A-dependent translation of formins could regulate polarized growth in such processes as fertility and cancer in higher eukaryotes.     

Genetic Analysis of the Ribosome Biogenesis Factor Ltv1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ribosome biogenesis has been studied extensively in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast Ltv1 is a conserved 40S-associated biogenesis factor that has been proposed to function in small subunit nuclear export. Here we show that Ltv1 has a canonical leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) at its extreme C terminus that is both necessary for Crm1 interaction and Ltv1 export. The C terminus of Ltv1 can substitute for the NES in the 60S-export adapter Nmd3, demonstrating that it is a functional NES. Overexpression of an Ltv1 lacking its NES (Ltv1∆C13) was strongly dominant negative and resulted in the nuclear accumulation of RpS3-GFP; however, export of the pre-40S was not affected. In addition, expression of endogenous levels of Ltv1∆C protein complemented both the slow-growth phenotype and the 40S biogenesis defect of an ltv1 deletion mutant. Thus, if Ltv1 is a nuclear export adapter for the pre-40S subunit, its function must be fully redundant with additional export factors. The dominant negative phenotype of Ltv1∆NES overexpression was suppressed by co-overexpressing RpS3 and its chaperone, Yar1, or by deletion of the RpS3-binding site in Ltv1∆NES, suggesting that titration of RpS3 by Ltv1∆NES is deleterious in yeast. The dominant-negative phenotype did not correlate with a decrease in 40S levels but rather with a reduction in the polysome-to-monosome ratio, indicating reduced rates of translation. We suggest that titration of RpS3 by excess nuclear Ltv1 interferes with 40S function or with a nonribosomal function of RpS3.     

Autophagy Competes for a Common Phosphatidylethanolamine Pool with Major Cellular PE-Consuming Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Autophagy is a highly regulated pathway that selectively degrades cellular constituents such as protein aggregates and excessive or damaged organelles. This transport route is characterized by engulfment of the targeted cargo by autophagosomes. The formation of these double-membrane vesicles requires the covalent conjugation of the ubiquitin-like protein Atg8 to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). However, the origin of PE and the regulation of lipid flux required for autophagy remain poorly understood. Using a genetic screen, we found that the temperature-sensitive growth and intracellular membrane organization defects of mcd4-174 and mcd4-P301L mutants are suppressed by deletion of essential autophagy genes such as ATG1 or ATG7. MCD4 encodes an ethanolamine phosphate transferase that uses PE as a precursor for an essential step in the synthesis of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor used to link a subset of plasma membrane proteins to lipid bilayers. Similar to the deletion of CHO2, a gene encoding the enzyme converting PE to phosphatidylcholine (PC), deletion of ATG7 was able to restore lipidation and plasma membrane localization of the GPI-anchored protein Gas1 and normal organization of intracellular membranes. Conversely, overexpression of Cho2 was lethal in mcd4-174 cells grown at restrictive temperature. Quantitative lipid analysis revealed that PE levels are substantially reduced in the mcd4-174 mutant but can be restored by deletion of ATG7 or CHO2. Taken together, these data suggest that autophagy competes for a common PE pool with major cellular PE-consuming pathways such as the GPI anchor and PC synthesis, highlighting the possible interplay between these pathways and the existence of signals that may coordinate PE flux.     

Changes in the Nuclear Envelope Environment Affect Spindle Pole Body Duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear membrane is part of a complex nuclear envelope environment also containing chromatin, integral and peripheral membrane proteins, and large structures such as nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and the spindle pole body. To study how properties of the nuclear membrane affect nuclear envelope processes, we altered the nuclear membrane by deleting the SPO7 gene. We found that spo7Δ cells were sickened by the mutation of genes coding for spindle pole body components and that spo7Δ was synthetically lethal with mutations in the SUN domain gene MPS3. Mps3p is required for spindle pole body duplication and for a variety of other nuclear envelope processes. In spo7Δ cells, the spindle pole body defect of mps3 mutants was exacerbated, suggesting that nuclear membrane composition affects spindle pole body function. The synthetic lethality between spo7Δ and mps3 mutants was suppressed by deletion of specific nucleoporin genes. In fact, these gene deletions bypassed the requirement for Mps3p entirely, suggesting that under certain conditions spindle pole body duplication can occur via an Mps3p-independent pathway. These data point to an antagonistic relationship between nuclear pore complexes and the spindle pole body. We propose a model whereby nuclear pore complexes either compete with the spindle pole body for insertion into the nuclear membrane or affect spindle pole body duplication by altering the nuclear envelope environment.THE nuclear envelope is composed of distinct outer and inner nuclear membranes. The outer nuclear membrane is continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum. The inner nuclear membrane is associated with a unique set of proteins, some of which mediate interactions between the nuclear envelope and chromatin (reviewed in Zhao et al. 2009). Nuclear pore complexes traverse both membranes and allow transport of proteins and solutes between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The inner and outer nuclear membranes fuse in the region surrounding each nuclear pore complex.In animal cells, the nuclear envelope disassembles as cells enter mitosis and reassembles upon mitotic exit. Nuclear envelope breakdown allows the association of chromosomes with spindle microtubules, which are nucleated from centrosomes that reside in the cytoplasm. In contrast, certain types of fungi, such as the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, undergo closed mitosis, where the nuclear envelope remains intact throughout the entire cell cycle. Closed mitosis is possible because the yeast centrosome-equivalent, the spindle pole body (SPB), is embedded in the nuclear envelope, allowing the SPB to nucleate both cytoplasmic and nuclear microtubules.SPB duplication requires a mechanism for inserting the new SPB into the nuclear envelope (reviewed in Jaspersen and Winey 2004). The new SPB begins to form in late G₁/early S phase as satellite material deposited on the cytoplasmic face of an electron-dense region of the nuclear envelope, called the half-bridge. The satellite material matures into a duplication plaque, which is then inserted into the nuclear membrane and becomes the daughter SPB. Many genes are known to be required for SPB duplication, and this process has been carefully examined cytologically (Rose and Fink 1987; Winey et al. 1991, 1993; Spang et al. 1995; Bullitt et al. 1997; Adams and Kilmartin 1999; Elliott et al. 1999; Schramm et al. 2000; Jaspersen et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2003; Araki et al. 2006). However, the exact mechanisms by which SPB duplication and insertion occur remain a mystery.Equally unclear is how nuclear pore complexes are inserted into an intact nuclear envelope (reviewed in Hetzer and Wente 2009). For both the SPB and nuclear pore complexes, the inner and outer nuclear membranes must fuse to allow insertion into the nuclear envelope. Yeast and vertebrate nuclear pore complexes each have four pore membrane (POM) nucleoporins containing transmembrane domains. Other nucleoporins have motifs with potential for bending membranes or sensing membrane curvature. Thus, certain nuclear pore complex components may have the ability to alter the nuclear membrane or stabilize particular membrane conformations (Devos et al. 2004, 2006; Alber et al. 2007; Drin et al. 2007). It is interesting to note that, in S. cerevisiae, nuclear pore complexes are enriched in the vicinity of the SPB (Heath et al. 1995; Winey et al. 1997; Adams and Kilmartin 1999), but the significance of this phenomenon is not known. The SPB and nuclear pore complexes share at least two common components, the integral membrane protein Ndc1p and the small calcium-binding protein Cdc31p (Chial et al. 1998; Fischer et al. 2004). Ndc1p is thought to play a role in insertion of both SPBs and nuclear pore complexes into the nuclear membrane.SUN domain proteins are a conserved family of inner nuclear membrane proteins that interact with specific outer nuclear membrane proteins to form a physical bridge across the nuclear envelope (reviewed in Hiraoka and Dernburg 2009; Razafsky and Hodzic 2009). One of the components of the S. cerevisiae SPB is the SUN domain protein Mps3p. The N terminus of Mps3p is in the nucleoplasm, while the C terminus, containing the SUN domain, is found in the space between the inner and outer nuclear membranes. In addition to the SPB, Mps3p localizes to multiple foci at the nuclear periphery, and these two pools of Mps3p have distinct functions (Jaspersen et al. 2002, 2006; Nishikawa et al. 2003). At the SPB, Mps3p is required for half-bridge formation and early steps of SPB duplication, and cells compromised for Mps3p function accumulate in mitosis with a single SPB and a monopolar spindle (Jaspersen et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2003). At the nuclear periphery, Mps3p is involved in tethering telomeres to the nuclear envelope in mitosis and meiosis, sequestering DNA double-strand breaks away from recombination factors, and associating with soluble chromatin proteins (Antoniacci et al. 2004, 2007; Bupp et al. 2007; Conrad et al. 2007, 2008; Oza et al. 2009; Schober et al. 2009).While many structural features of the yeast nucleus have been identified, little is known about how the physical properties of the nuclear membrane contribute to processes that occur at the nuclear envelope. As noted above, resident proteins of the nuclear envelope may affect nuclear membrane properties. In addition, the nuclear membrane is affected by altering lipid biosynthesis, for example, by inactivating the phosphatidic acid (PA) phosphohydrolase Pah1p or by inactivating the phosphates complex, made of Spo7p and Nem1p, which activates Pah1p. In the absence of Spo7p, Nem1p, or Pah1p, cells exhibit nuclear envelope extensions and extensive ER membrane sheets, and they also have altered membrane lipid composition, including a decrease in phosphatidylcholine and an increase in PA, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphatidylinositol (Siniossoglou et al. 1998; Santos-Rosa et al. 2005; Campbell et al. 2006; Han et al. 2006). These three proteins are unique among phospholipid biosynthesis proteins in their ability to affect nuclear morphology upon gene disruption (Han et al. 2008). A similar phenotype was seen upon overexpression of DGK1, which counteracts the activity of Pah1p by converting diacylglycerol to PA, leading to an increase in PA levels at the nuclear envelope (Han et al. 2008). Consistent with a conserved role for Pah1p in regulating nuclear envelope processes, deletion of either NEM1 or SPO7 is synthetically lethal with deletions of certain nucleoporin genes (Siniossoglou et al. 1998), and inactivation of the PAH1 homolog in Caenorhabditis elegans, LPIN-1, results in defects in nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly (Golden et al. 2009; Gorjanacz and Mattaj 2009).To identify processes that are affected by altered nuclear membrane properties, we screened for pathways that are compromised in spo7Δ cells. We found that SPO7 inactivation strongly influences the SPB. By screening for proteins that could alleviate spo7Δ-induced SPB defects, we uncovered an unexpected inhibitory role for nucleoporins in SPB function, revealing that nuclear pore complexes, or components thereof, act antagonistically to the SPB in the nuclear envelope. Taken together, our findings indicate that the nuclear envelope environment is important for the function of protein complexes and biological processes occurring at the nuclear periphery.