RNA Structures Required for Production of Subgenomic Flavivirus RNA

Flaviviruses are a group of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses causing ∼100 million infections per year. We have recently shown that flaviviruses produce a unique, small, noncoding RNA (∼0.5 kb) derived from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the genomic RNA (gRNA), which is required for flavivirus-induced cytopathicity and pathogenicity (G. P. Pijlman et al., Cell Host Microbe, 4: 579-591, 2008). This RNA (subgenomic flavivirus RNA [sfRNA]) is a product of incomplete degradation of gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, which stalls on the rigid secondary structure stem-loop II (SL-II) located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR. Mutations or deletions of various secondary structures in the 3′ UTR resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3). Here, we investigated in detail the importance of West Nile virus Kunjin (WNV_KUN) 3′ UTR secondary structures as well as tertiary interactions for sfRNA formation. We show that secondary structures SL-IV and dumbbell 1 (DB1) downstream of SL-II are able to prevent further degradation of gRNA when the SL-II structure is deleted, leading to production of sfRNA2 and sfRNA3, respectively. We also show that a number of pseudoknot (PK) interactions, in particular PK1 stabilizing SL-II and PK3 stabilizing DB1, are required for protection of gRNA from nuclease degradation and production of sfRNA. Our results show that PK interactions play a vital role in the production of nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is essential for viral cytopathicity in cells and pathogenicity in mice.Arthropod-borne flaviviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) cause major outbreaks of potentially fatal disease and affect over 50 million people every year. The highly pathogenic North American strain of WNV (WNV_NY99) has already claimed more than 1,000 lives with over 27,000 cases reported since its emergence in New York in 1999 and has raised global public health concerns (9). In contrast, the closely related Australian strain of WNV, WNV_KUN, is highly attenuated and does not cause overt disease in humans and animals (11). WNV_KUN has been used extensively as a model virus to study flavivirus replication and flavivirus-host interactions (13, 14, 16-19, 26, 38, 39).The ∼11-kb positive-stranded, capped WNV genomic RNA (gRNA) lacks a poly(A) tail and consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) flanking one open reading frame, which encodes the viral proteins required for the viral life cycle (6, 15, 38, 39). Flavivirus UTRs are involved in translation and initiation of RNA replication and likely determine genome packaging (13, 14, 16, 21, 30, 39-41). Both the 5′ UTR (∼100 nucleotides [nt] in size) and the 3′ UTR (from ∼400 to 700 nucleotides) can form secondary and tertiary structures which are highly conserved among mosquito-borne flaviviruses (1, 8, 10, 14, 29, 32, 34). More specifically, the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR consists of several conserved regions and secondary structures (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) which were previously predicted or shown to exist in various flaviviruses by computational and chemical analyses, respectively (4, 10, 25, 26, 29-32). The 5′ end of the 3′ UTR starts with an AU-rich region which can form stem-loop structure I (SL-I) followed by SL-II, which we previously showed to be vitally important for subgenomic flavivirus RNA (sfRNA) production (26; see also below). SL-II is followed by a short, repeated conserved hairpin (RCS3) and SL-III (26). Further downstream of SL-III are the SL-IV and CS3 structures, which are remarkably similar to the preceding SL-II-RCS3 structure (26, 29). Further downstream of the SL-IV-CS3 structure are dumbbells 1 and 2 (DB1 and DB2, respectively) followed by a short SL and the 3′ SL (25, 26).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Model of the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR RNA structure. Highlighted in bold are the secondary structures investigated here. Dashed lines indicate putative PKs. The two sites of the putative PK interactions are shown in open boxes. sfRNA1, -2, -3, and -4 start sites are indicated by arrows. (R)CS, (repeated) conserved sequence; DB, dumbbell structure; PK, pseudoknot; SL, stem-loop. (B) Structural model of PK1 in SL-II with disruptive mutations. Nucleotide numbering is from the end of the 3′ UTR. The sfRNA1 start is indicated by an arrow. Nucleotides forming PK1 are on a gray background, and mutated nucleotides are white on a black background. (C) Sequences mutated in the different constructs. Nucleotides in the wt PK sequences used for mutations are bold and underlined. Introduced mutations are shown under the corresponding nucleotides in the wt sequence.The described structures have been investigated in some detail for their requirement in RNA replication and translation. Generally, a progressive negative effect on viral growth was shown with progressive deletions into the 3′-proximal region of the JEV 3′ UTR (41). However, only a relatively short region of the JEV 3′ UTR, consisting of the 3′-terminal 193 nt, was shown to be absolutely essential for gRNA replication (41). The minimal region for DENV replication was reported to be even shorter (23). Extensive analysis has shown that the most 3′-terminal, essential regions of the 3′ UTR include the cyclization sequence and 3′ SL, which are required for efficient RNA replication (2, 14, 16, 23, 35). As we showed, deletion of SL-II or SL-I did not overtly affect WNV_KUN replication (26). However, deletion of CS2, RCS2, CS3, or RCS3 in WNV replicon RNA significantly reduced RNA replication but not translation (20), indicating that these elements facilitate but are not essential for RNA replication. In addition, it was shown that deletion of DB1 or DB2 resulted in a viable mutant virus that was reduced in growth efficiency, while deletion of both DB structures resulted in a nonviable mutant (23).In addition to the above-mentioned secondary stem-loop structures, computational and chemical analysis of the flavivirus 3′ UTR suggested the presence of 5 pseudoknot (PK) interactions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 26, 32). A PK is a structure formed upon base pairing of a single-stranded region of RNA in the loop of a hairpin to a stretch of complementary nucleotides elsewhere in the RNA chain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). These structures are referred to as hairpin type (H-type) PKs (3), and they usually stabilize secondary RNA structures. Typically, the final tertiary structure does not significantly alter the preformed secondary structure (5). In general, PK interactions have been shown to be important in biological processes such as initiation and/or elongation of translation, initiation of gRNA replication, and ribosomal frameshifting for a number of different viruses, including flaviviruses (reviewed in references 3 and 22). The first PK in the WNV 3′ UTR was predicted to form in SL-II, followed by a similar PK in SL-IV (26) (PK1 and PK2 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). For the DENV, yellow fever virus (YFV), and JEV subgroup of flaviviruses, two PKs further downstream were predicted to form between DB1 and DB2 and corresponding single-stranded RNA regions located further downstream (25) (PK3 and PK4 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). The formation of these structures is supported by covariations in the WNV RNAs. In addition, a PK was proposed to form between a short SL and the 3′ SL at the 3′ terminus of the viral genome (32) (PK5 in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A).Importantly, in addition to its role in viral replication and translation, we have shown that the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR is important for the production of a small noncoding RNA fragment designated sfRNA (26). This short RNA fragment of ∼0.5 kb is derived from the 3′ UTR of the gRNA and exclusively produced by the members of the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, where it is required for efficient viral replication, cytopathicity, and pathogenicity (26). Our studies suggested that sfRNA is a product of incomplete degradation of the gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, resulting from XRN1 stalling on the rigid secondary/tertiary structures located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR (26). XRN1 is an exoribonuclease which usually degrades mRNA from the 5′ to the 3′ end as part of cellular mRNA decay and turnover (33), and it was shown previously that XRN1 can be stalled by SL structures (28). Mutations or deletions of WNV 3′ UTR secondary structures resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3) (26). In particular, SL-II (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) was shown to be important for sfRNA1 production; deletion of this structure either alone or in conjunction with other structures located downstream of SL-II abolished sfRNA1 production, leading to the production of the smaller RNA fragments sfRNA2 and sfRNA3.Here, we extended our investigation and studied the importance of several predicted 3′ UTR secondary structures and PK interactions for the production of sfRNA. To further understand the generation mechanism of sfRNA and its requirements, we deleted or mutated a number of RNA structures in the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR and investigated the size and amount of sfRNA generated from these mutant RNAs. The results show that not only SLs but also PK interactions play a vital role in stabilizing the 3′ UTR RNA and preventing complete degradation of viral gRNA to produce nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is required for efficient virus replication and cytopathicity in cells and virulence in mice.     

3′ cis-Acting Elements That Contribute to the Competence and Efficiency of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genome Replication: Functional Importance of Sequence Duplications,Deletions, and Substitutions

The positive-strand RNA genome of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) terminates in a highly conserved 3′-noncoding region (3′NCR) of six domains (V, X, I, II-1, II-2, and III in the 5′-to-3′ direction). By manipulating the JEV genomic RNA, we have identified important roles for RNA elements present within the 574-nucleotide 3′NCR in viral replication. The two 3′-proximal domains (II-2 and III) were sufficient for RNA replication and virus production, whereas the remaining four (V, X, I, and II-1) were dispensable for RNA replication competence but required for maximal replication efficiency. Surprisingly, a lethal mutant lacking all of the 3′NCR except domain III regained viability through pseudoreversion by duplicating an 83-nucleotide sequence from the 3′-terminal region of the viral open reading frame. Also, two viable mutants displayed severe genetic instability; these two mutants rapidly developed 12 point mutations in domain II-2 in the mutant lacking domains V, X, I, and II-1 and showed the duplication of seven upstream sequences of various sizes at the junction between domains II-1 and II-2 in the mutant lacking domains V, X, and I. In all cases, the introduction of these spontaneous mutations led to an increase in RNA production that paralleled the level of protein accumulation and virus yield. Interestingly, the mutant lacking domains V, X, I, and II-1 was able to replicate in hamster BHK-21 and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells but not in mosquito C6/36 cells, indicating a cell type-specific restriction of its viral replication. Thus, our findings provide the basis for a detailed map of the 3′ cis-acting elements in JEV genomic RNA, which play an essential role in viral replication. They also provide experimental evidence for the function of 3′ direct repeat sequences and suggest possible mechanisms for the emergence of these sequences in the 3′NCR of JEV and perhaps in other flaviviruses.Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a mosquito-borne flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae, is serologically related to several significant human pathogens, including West Nile virus (WNV), Kunjin virus (KUNV), St. Louis encephalitis virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. It is also phylogenetically close to other clinically important human pathogens, including yellow fever virus (YFV) and dengue virus (DENV) (11, 67). JEV is the leading cause of viral encephalitis in Southeast Asia, including China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and India, and it has begun to expand throughout the Indonesian archipelago and as far as Australia (21, 43). Despite the fact that JEV is generally asymptomatic, ∼50,000 cases are reported annually, and the disease has a mortality rate of ∼25%, mainly in children and young adults (29, 63). Thus, the geographic expansion and clinical importance of JEV infection have drawn increasing attention from the international public health community (44, 71).Like other flaviviruses, JEV is a spherical enveloped virus (∼50 nm diameter) with a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome that contains a 5′ cap structure but lacks a 3′ polyadenylated tail. Its genomic RNA of ∼11,000 nucleotides (nt) consists of a single long open reading frame (ORF) with two noncoding regions (NCRs) at the 5′ and 3′ ends (41, 84). The ORF is translated into an ∼3,400-amino acid polyprotein precursor, which is co- or posttranslationally cleaved by a cellular protease(s) or a viral protease complex into 10 mature proteins: (i) three structural proteins, the capsid (C), premembrane (prM; which is further processed into pr and M), and envelope (E) proteins; and (ii) seven nonstructural proteins, NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5, as arranged in the genome (13, 41, 84). The nonstructural proteins, together with cellular factors, form a viral replicase complex that directs the replication of the genomic RNA in the cytoplasm of the host cell in association with perinuclear membranes (40, 74). For the synthesis of the genomic RNA to take place, this replicase complex must specifically recognize viral cis-acting RNA elements, defined by primary sequences or secondary/tertiary structures. These RNA elements are found in various locations within the genome but most frequently are located in the 5′- and 3′NCRs (23, 47). The identification and characterization of these cis-acting RNA elements is critical for understanding the complete cycle of JEV genome replication.The availability of the complete nucleotide sequence of YFV genomic RNA (57) has led to the identification of three major conserved elements in the 5′- and 3′-terminal regions of the genomic RNA that contain the short primary sequences and secondary structures required for flavivirus RNA replication. (i) Both ends of the genomic RNA terminate with the conserved dinucleotides 5′-AG and CU-3′ (9, 10, 32, 45, 57, 72, 73) in all flaviviruses except an insect cell fusing agent virus (12). Mutations substituting another nucleotide for one of these four nucleotides in KUNV or WNV replicon RNA are known to abolish or compromise RNA replication (35, 69). (ii) A 3′ stem-loop structure (3′SL) has been recognized in all flaviviruses within the ∼90-nt 3′-terminal region of the genomic RNA (9, 45, 57). The structural and functional importance of this 3′SL in RNA replication has been demonstrated in several flaviviruses (9, 18, 49, 50, 61, 70, 82, 86). (iii) The presence of short 5′ and 3′ cyclization sequences (5′CYC and 3′CYC, respectively) in all mosquito-borne flaviviruses suggests that flavivirus genomes can cyclize via 5′-3′ long-range base-pairing interaction, since the 3′CYC upstream of the 3′SL is complementary to the 5′CYC in the 5′ coding region of the C protein (30). The role of these CYC motifs in RNA replication has been well characterized via cell-based assays in many mosquito-borne flaviviruses, including KUNV (34), WNV (42), YFV (8, 14), and DENV (2, 22, 49), and in cell-free systems in the case of WNV (51) and DENV (1, 3, 79, 80). Other RNA elements that have recently been shown to be important for RNA replication in DENV and WNV include an additional pair of complementary sequences (designated 5′- and 3′UARs) that participate in genome cyclization (3, 4, 17, 87) and a 5′ stem-loop structure (designated 5′SLA) present within the 5′NCR that promotes RNA synthesis in association with the 3′NCR (22).In all flaviviruses, the 3′NCR of the genomic RNA is relatively long (∼400 to ∼800 nt), with an array of conserved primary sequences and secondary structures. Although significant progress has been made in identifying cis-acting elements within the 3′NCRs that are essential for RNA replication, most of these elements (i.e., the 3′CYC, 3′SL, and CU-3′) are limited to the ∼100-nt 3′-terminal region that is highly conserved in these viruses (see recent reviews in references 23 and 47). However, the functional importance of the remaining 5′-proximal region of the 3′NCR, which differs in sequence between the various serological groups, is poorly understood. In particular, comparative sequence analyses and genetic algorithm-based computer modeling have suggested that in addition to the well-studied ∼100-nt 3′-proximal region, the remaining ∼474-nt 5′-proximal region of the 574-nt JEV 3′NCR also contains several RNA elements that may play critical roles in the viral life cycle (52, 55, 56, 68). To date, however, experimental evidence for the functional importance of these potential RNA elements in JEV genomic RNA replication is lacking.In the present study, we have identified and characterized the 3′ cis-acting RNA elements within the JEV 3′NCR and shown that they play an essential and/or regulatory role in genomic RNA replication. In particular, we have constructed and functionally characterized genome-length JEV mutant cDNAs with a series of 5′-to-3′ or 3′-to-5′ progressive deletions within the 3′NCR. In addition to identifying particular mutations within this region that affect either the competence or efficiency of genomic RNA replication, we found that the serial passaging of these mutants in susceptible BHK-21 cells produced a large number of pseudorevertants bearing a wide variety of spontaneous point mutations and sequence duplications, some of which were capable of restoring the replication competence of the defective mutants or enhancing replication efficiency. In addition, we assessed the replication of these mutants in three different cell types (BHK-21, SH-SY5Y, and C6/36 cells). Collectively, these data offer new insights into the functional importance of 3′ cis-acting RNA elements that regulate the cell type-dependent replication of JEV and perhaps other closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses. Our findings also provide experimental evidence for the emergence of functional 3′ direct repeat sequences that are duplicated from the coding region and 3′NCR of JEV genomic RNA.     

Bovine Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 1 (p28) Is an RNA Binding Protein That Binds Terminal Genomic cis-Replication Elements

Nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a 28-kDa protein in the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and closely related mouse hepatitis coronavirus, is the first protein cleaved from the open reading frame 1 (ORF 1) polyprotein product of genome translation. Recently, a 30-nucleotide (nt) cis-replication stem-loop VI (SLVI) has been mapped at nt 101 to 130 within a 288-nt 5′-terminal segment of the 738-nt nsp1 cistron in a BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA. Since a similar nsp1 coding region appears in all characterized groups 1 and 2 coronavirus DI RNAs and must be translated in cis for BCoV DI RNA replication, we hypothesized that nsp1 might regulate ORF 1 expression by binding this intra-nsp1 cistronic element. Here, we (i) establish by mutation analysis that the 72-nt intracistronic SLV immediately upstream of SLVI is also a DI RNA cis-replication signal, (ii) show by gel shift and UV-cross-linking analyses that cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa, but not viral proteins, bind SLV and SLVI, (SLV-VI) and (iii) demonstrate by gel shift analysis that nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind three 5′ untranslated region (UTR)- and one 3′ UTR-located cis-replication SLs. Notably, nsp1 specifically binds SLIII and its flanking sequences in the 5′ UTR with ∼2.5 μM affinity. Additionally, under conditions enabling expression of nsp1 from DI RNA-encoded subgenomic mRNA, DI RNA levels were greatly reduced, but there was only a slight transient reduction in viral RNA levels. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function to regulate viral genome translation or replication but not by binding SLV-VI within its own coding region.Coronaviruses (CoVs) (59) cause primarily respiratory and gastroenteric diseases in birds and mammals (35, 71). In humans, they most commonly cause mild upper respiratory disease, but the recently discovered human CoVs (HCoVs), HCoV-NL63 (65), HCoV-HKU1 (73), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV (40) cause serious diseases in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. The SARS-CoV causes pneumonia with an accompanying high (∼10%) mortality rate (69). The ∼30-kb positive-strand CoV genome, the largest known among RNA viruses, is 5′ capped and 3′ polyadenylated and replicates in the cytoplasm (41). As with other characterized cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses (3), translation of the CoV genome is an early step in replication, and terminally located cis-acting RNA signals regulate translation and direct genome replication (41). How these happen mechanistically in CoVs is only beginning to be understood.In the highly studied group 2 mouse hepatitis coronavirus model (MHV A59 strain) and its close relative the bovine CoV (BCoV Mebus strain), five higher-order cis-replication signals have been identified in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). These include two in the 5′ UTR required for BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA replication (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) described as stem-loop III (SLIII) (50) and SLIV (51). Recently, the SLI region in BCoV (15) has been reanalyzed along with the homologous region in MHV and is now described as comprising SL1 and SL2 (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), of which SL2 has been shown to be a cis-replication structure in the context of the MHV genome (38). In the 3′ UTR, two higher-order cis-replication structures have been identified that function in both DI RNA and the MHV genome. These are a 5′-proximal bulged SL and adjacent pseudoknot that potentially act together as a unit (23, 27, 28, 72) and a 3′-proximal octamer-associated bulged SL (39, 76) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). In addition, the 5′-terminal 65-nucleotide (nt) leader and the 3′-terminal poly(A) tail have been shown to be cis-replication signals for BCoV DI RNA (15, 60).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.RNA structures in the BCoV genome tested for nsp1 binding. (A) BCoV 5′-terminal and 3′-terminal cis-acting RNA SL structures and flanking sequences identified for BCoV DI RNA replication. Regions of the genome are identified and SL cis-replication elements are identified schematically. Open boxes at nt 100 and 211 identify AUG start codons for the short upstream ORF and ORF 1, respectively. A closed box at nt 124 identifies the UAG stop codon for the short upstream ORF. Shown below the SL structures are the RNA segments used as ³²P-labeled probes in the gel shift assays. BSL-PK, bulged SL-pseudoknot; 8mer-BSL, octamer-associated bulged SL. (B) Gel shift assays for probes when used with purified nsp1. Protein-RNA complexes identifying a shifted probe are labeled C.In CoVs, the 5′-proximal open reading frame (ORF) of ∼20 kb (called ORF 1) comprising the 5′ two-thirds of the genome is translated to overlapping polyproteins of ∼500 and ∼700 kDa, named pp1a and pp1ab (41). pp1ab is formed by a −1 ribosomal frameshift event at the ORF1a-ORF1b junction during translation (41). pp1a and pp1ab are proteolytically processed into potentially 16 nonstructural protein (nsp) end products or partial end products that are proposed to function together as the replicase (24). ORF 1a encodes nsps 1 to 11 which include papain-like proteases (nsp3), a 3C-like main protease (nsp5), membrane-anchoring proteins (nsps 4 and 6), a potential primase (nsp8), and RNA-binding proteins (nsp 7/nsp 8 complex and nsps 9 and 10) of imprecisely understood function (19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 43, 49, 77). ORF 1b encodes nsps 12 to 16 which function as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a helicase, an exonuclease, an endonuclease, and a 2′-O-methyltransferase, respectively (6, 17, 24, 44). 3′ Proximal genomic ORFs encoding structural and accessory proteins are translated from a 3′-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs) (41).The N-terminal ORF 1a protein, nsp1, in the case of BCoV and MHV is also named p28 to identify the cleaved 28-kDa product (18). The precise role of nsp1 in virus replication has not been determined, but it is known that a sequence encoding an N-proximal nsp1 region in MHV (nt 255 to 369 in the 738-nt coding sequence) cannot be deleted from the genome without loss of productive infection (10). nsp1 also directly binds nsp7 and nsp10 (11) and by confocal microscopy is found associated with the membranous replication complex (10, 66) and virus assembly sites (11). The amino acid sequence of nsp1 is poorly conserved among CoVs, indicating that it may be a protein that interacts with cellular components (1, 58). In the absence of other viral proteins, MHV nsp1 induces general host mRNA degradation (79) and cell cycle arrest (16). The SARS-CoV nsp1 homolog, a 20-kDa protein, has been reported to cause mRNA degradation (30, 45), inhibition of host protein synthesis (30, 45, 70), inhibition of interferon signaling (70, 79), and cytokine dysregulation in lung cells (36).In this study, we examine the RNA-binding properties of BCoV nsp1 with the hypothesis that it is a potential regulator of translation or replication through its binding of SLVI mapping within its coding region. The rationale for this hypothesis stems from five observations. (i) In the BCoV DI RNA, the 5′-terminal one-third (approximately) of the nsp1 cistron and the entire nucleocapsid (N) protein cistron together comprise the single contiguous ORF in the DI RNA, and most of both coding regions appear required for DI RNA replication (15). (ii) The partial nsp1 cistron in the DI RNA must be translated in cis for DI RNA replication in helper virus-infected cells (12, 14). (iii) A similar part of the nsp1 cistron is found in the genome of all characterized naturally occurring group 1 and 2 CoV DI RNAs described to date (7, 8). (iv) A cis-acting SL named SLVI is found within the partial nsp1 cistron in the BCoV DI RNA (12). (v) Translation, which involves a 5′→3′ transit of ribosomes, and negative-strand synthesis, which involves a 3′→5′ transit of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, cannot simultaneously occur on the same molecule with a single ORF (4, 31). Thus, to enable genome replication an inhibition of translation at least early in infection for cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses is required (4, 5, 22, 32). Mechanisms of translation inhibition have been described for the Qβ viral genome, wherein the viral replicase autoregulates translation by binding an intracistronic cis-replication element (32), and for the polio virus genome, wherein genome circularization inhibits the early translation step (5, 22). Therefore, since nsp1 is synthesized early and also contains an intracistronic cis-replication element, we postulated that it is autoregulatory with RNA binding properties.Here, we do the following: (i) demonstrate by mutagenesis analysis that the 72-nt SLV, mapping immediately upstream of SLVI and within the partial nsp1 cistron, is also a cis-acting DI RNA replication element; (ii) show by gel shift and UV cross-linking analyses that there is likely no binding of an intracellular viral protein to SLV and SLVI (SLV-VI), but there is binding of unidentified cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa; and (iii) show by gel shift analysis that recombinant nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind SLs I to IV in the 5′ UTR and also the 3′-terminal bulged SL in the 3′ UTR, suggesting a possible regulatory role at these sites. Notably, specific binding with ∼2.5 μM affinity of nsp1 to SLIII and its flanking regions in the 5′ UTR was observed. Additionally, we show that, under conditions that would express nsp1 from a DI RNA-encoded sgmRNA, DI RNA levels are greatly reduced; viral RNA species levels, however, are reduced only slightly, and this reduction is transient. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function as a regulator of viral translation or replication but not through its binding of cis-acting SLs V and VI within its own cistron.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Structural and Functional Elements of the Promoter Encoded by the 5′ Untranslated Region of the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus Genome

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is one of the most pathogenic members of the Alphavirus genus in the Togaviridae family. The pathogenesis of this virus depends strongly on the sequences of the structural proteins and on the mutations in the RNA promoter encoded by the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the viral genome. In this study, we performed a detailed investigation of the structural and functional elements of the 5′-terminal promoter and analyzed the effect of multiple mutations introduced into the VEEV 5′UTR on virus and RNA replication. The results of this study demonstrate that RNA replication is determined by two synergistically functioning RNA elements. One of them is a very 5′-terminal AU dinucleotide, which is not involved in the stable RNA secondary structure, and the second is a short, G-C-rich RNA stem. An increase or decrease in the stem''s stability has deleterious effects on virus and RNA replication. In response to mutations in these RNA elements, VEEV replicative machinery was capable of developing new, compensatory sequences in the 5′UTR either containing 5′-terminal AUG or AU repeats or leading to the formation of new, heterologous stem-loops. Analysis of the numerous compensatory mutations suggested that at least two different mechanisms are involved in their generation. Some of the modifications introduced into the 5′ terminus of the viral genome led to an accumulation of the mutations in the VEEV nsPs, which suggested to us that there is a direct involvement of these proteins in promoter recognition. Furthermore, our data provide new evidence that the 3′ terminus of the negative-strand viral genome in the double-stranded RNA replicative intermediate is represented by a single-stranded RNA. Both the overall folding and the sequence determine its efficient function as a promoter for VEEV positive-strand RNA genome synthesis.Alphaviruses are a group of important human and animal pathogens. They are widely distributed both in the New and the Old Worlds and circulate between mosquito vectors and vertebrate hosts (45). In mosquitoes, they cause a persistent, life-long infection characterized by virus accumulation in salivary glands, which is required for infecting vertebrate hosts during a blood meal (50). In vertebrates, alphaviruses develop high-titer viremia, and their replication induces a variety of diseases with symptoms depending on both the host and the causative virus (11). Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), the New World alphavirus, is one of the most pathogenic members of the genus (16, 45). Representatives of the VEEV serocomplex circulate in Central, South, and North America and cause severe, and sometimes fatal, encephalitis in humans and horses (3, 11, 16, 24). Accordingly, VEEV represents a serious public health threat in the United States (39, 48, 51, 53), and during VEEV epizootics, equine mortality can reach 83%, and in humans, neurological diseases can be detected in up to 14% of all infected individuals, especially children (15). The overall mortality rate for humans is below 1%, but it is usually higher among children, the elderly, and, most likely, immunocompromised individuals (49). In spite of the continuous threat of VEEV epidemics, the biology of this virus, its pathogenesis, and the mechanism of replication are insufficiently understood. To date, no safe and efficient vaccine and therapeutic means have been developed for this pathogen.The VEEV genome is represented by a single-stranded, almost 11.5-kb-long RNA molecule of positive polarity. This RNA mimics the structure of cellular mRNAs by containing a cap at the 5′ ends and a poly(A) tail at the 3′ ends of the genome (18). The genomic RNA encodes two polyproteins: the 5′-terminal open reading frame (ORF) is translated into viral nonstructural proteins (nsP1 to nsP4), forming the replication enzyme complex (RC). The second ORF corresponds to the 3′-terminal one-third of the genome and encodes all of the viral structural proteins, C, E2, and E1. The latter proteins are translated from the subgenomic RNA synthesized during virus replication (45).The replication of the alphavirus genome is a highly regulated, multistep process, which includes the synthesis of three different RNA species (45). The regulation of their synthesis is achieved by differential processing of viral nsPs (22, 23, 43). First, the initially synthesized nonstructural polyprotein is partially processed by the nsP2-associated protease into P123 and nsP4, and this complex is active in negative-strand RNA synthesis (22). The latter RNA is present in the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) replicative intermediate and is associated with plasma membrane and endosome-like vesicular organelles (8). Further processing of the polyproteins into individual nsP1 to nsP4 makes the RC capable of the synthesis of the positive-strand genome and subgenomic RNA but not of negative-strand RNA (23, 41, 42). Thus, the completely processed nsPs utilize only the promoters located on the negative strand of the viral genome.The defined promoters in the alphavirus genomes include (i) a 3′-terminal 19-nucleotide (nt)-long, conserved sequence element (CSE) adjacent to the poly(A) tail (12, 13, 19); (ii) the subgenomic promoter in the negative-strand copy of the viral genome (25); and (iii) the promoter for the synthesis of the positive-strand viral genome (45). The latter promoter is located at the 3′ end of the negative strand of the viral genome and has a complex structure. The two identified elements include the sequence, encoded by the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) (a core promoter) (5, 9, 32), and a 51-nt CSE, found ∼150 nt downstream of the genome''s 5′ terminus in the nsP1-encoding sequence. Our previous results and those of other research groups demonstrated that the 51-nt CSE functions as a replication enhancer in a virus- and cell-dependent mode (4, 33). Clustered mutations in the VEEV 51-nt CSE or its complete deletion either had deleterious effects on RNA replication or completely abolished RNA synthesis (30). However, RNA replication was ultimately recovered due to an accumulation of compensatory, adaptive mutations in either VEEV nsP2 or nsP3 (30). Thus, the 51-nt CSE in the VEEV genome is not absolutely essential for virus replication, but its presence is highly beneficial for achieving the most efficient growth rates in cells of both vertebrate and invertebrate origins. Alphavirus core promoters demonstrate a very low level of sequence conservation and also function in cell- and virus-specific modes (9). Previous studies suggested that the sequence and/or secondary structure of the VEEV core promoter plays a critical role in virus pathogenesis, and the G3→A (A3) mutation, found in an attenuated strain of VEEV TC-83, is one of the determinants of its less pathogenic phenotype (17, 55). However, information about functional elements of the VEEV core promoter remains incomplete, and its structural and functional elements have not yet been dissected.In this study, we applied a combination of molecular approaches to further define the functional components of the VEEV 5′UTR-specific core promoter, which mediates positive-strand genome synthesis. Our results demonstrate the presence of three structural RNA elements, two of which synergistically determine promoter activity. The first element of the promoter is a very short, 5′-terminal sequence, which is not involved in a stable secondary structure. Point mutations in the very 5′-terminal nucleotides have a deleterious effect on genome RNA replication. The second element is the short RNA stem, located in close proximity to the 5′ end of the genome. Mutations changing either the stability or sequence of the stem strongly affect virus replication and cause its rapid evolution, leading to the appearance of heterologous repeating elements in the unpaired 5′ terminus or the generation of other sequences that might potentially fold into stem structures. Surprisingly, the third structural RNA element, the loop, appears to play no important role in RNA replication and can be replaced either by a shorter loop or by the loop having a heterologous sequence without a detectable effect on virus and RNA replication.