首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
This study focuses on two representatives of experimentally uncharacterized haloalkane dehalogenases from the subfamily HLD-III. We report biochemical characterization of the expression products of haloalkane dehalogenase genes drbA from Rhodopirellula baltica SH1 and dmbC from Mycobacterium bovis 5033/66. The DrbA and DmbC enzymes show highly oligomeric structures and very low activities with typical substrates of haloalkane dehalogenases.Haloalkane dehalogenases (EC 3.8.1.5.) acting on halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons catalyze carbon-halogen bond cleavage, leading to an alcohol, a halide ion, and a proton as the reaction products (7). Haloalkane dehalogenases originating from various bacterial strains have potential for application in bioremediation technologies (4, 6, 22), construction of biosensors (2), decontamination of warfare agents (17), and synthesis of optically pure compounds (19). Recent evolutionary study of haloalkane dehalogenase sequences revealed the existence of three subfamilies, denoted HLD-I, HLD-II, and HLD-III (3). In contrast to subfamilies HLD-I and HLD-II, the subfamily HLD-III is currently lacking experimentally characterized proteins. We have therefore focused on the isolation and study of two selected representatives of the HLD-III subfamily, DrbA and DmbC.The drbA gene was amplified by PCR using the cosmid pircos.a3g10 originating from marine bacterium Rhodopirellula baltica SH1, and the dmbC gene was amplified from DNA originating from obligatory pathogen Mycobacterium bovis 5033/66. Six-histidine tails were added to the C termini of DrbA and DmbC in a cloning step, enabling single-step purification using Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid resin. Haloalkane dehalogenase DrbA was expressed under the T7 promoter and purified, with a resulting yield of 0.1 mg of protein per gram of cell mass. Haloalkane dehalogenase DmbC was obtained by expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis, with a yield of 0.07 mg of purified protein per gram of cell mass.The correct folding and secondary structures of the newly prepared enzymes were verified by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Far-UV CD spectra were recorded for DrbA and DmbC enzymes and other, related haloalkane dehalogenases. All enzymes tested exhibited CD spectra with two negative features at 208 and 222 nm and one positive peak at 195 nm, which are characteristic of α-helical content (Fig. (Fig.1).1). This suggested that both new enzymes, DrbA and DmbC, were folded correctly. However, DmbC exhibited more intense negative maxima which differed from other haloalkane dehalogenases in the θ222208 ratio. This finding indicated a slight variation in the arrangement of secondary structure elements of the DmbC enzyme. Thermally induced denaturations of DrbA and DmbC were tested in parallel. Both enzymes showed changes in ellipticity during increasing temperature. The melting temperatures calculated from these curves were 45.8 ± 0.4°C for DmbC and 39.4 ± 0.1°C for DrbA. The thermostability results obtained for DrbA and DmbC were in good agreement with the range of melting temperatures determined for other, related haloalkane dehalogenases.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Far-UV CD spectra of DrbA, DmbC, and seven different biochemically characterized haloalkane dehalogenases. Protein concentration used for far-UV CD spectrum measurement was 0.2 mg/ml.The sizes of the purified proteins were estimated by electrophoresis under native conditions conducted using a 10% polyacrylamide gel (Fig. (Fig.2).2). More precise determination of the sizes of DrbA and DmbC was achieved by gel filtration chromatography performed on Sephacryl S-500 HR (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), calibrated with blue dextran 2000, thyroglobulin (669 kDa), ferritin (440 kDa), catalase (240 kDa), conalbumin (75 kDa), and ovalbumin (43 kDa) (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). Both DrbA and DmbC were eluted from the column in the fraction prior to blue dextran, indicating that both enzymes form oligomeric complexes of a size larger than 2,000 kDa (Fig. 3B and C). The haloalkane dehalogenases which have been biochemically characterized so far form monomers, except for DbjA isolated from Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 (21), which shows monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric forms according to the pH of the buffer (R. Chaloupkova, submitted for publication).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Native protein electrophoresis of DrbA and DmbC. Lane 1, carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa); lane 2, ovalbumin (43 kDa); lane 3, bovine albumin (67 kDa); lane 4, conalbumin (75 kDa); lane 5, catalase (240 kDa); lane 6, ferritin (440 kDa); lane 7, DrbA; lane 8, DmbC.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Gel filtration chromatogram of DrbA and DmbC. (A) The following calibration kit samples (0.5 ml of a concentration of 2 mg/ml protein loaded) were analyzed using 50 mM Tris-HCl with 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, as elution buffer: blue dextran (line 1, 9.6-ml fraction), thyroglobulin (line 2, 15.95-ml fraction), ferritin (line 3, 16.78-ml fraction), ovalbumin (line 4, 18.55-ml fraction), and RNase A (line 5, 20.08-ml fraction). (B and C) Haloalkane dehalogenase DrbA eluted in the 9.03-ml fraction (B), and haloalkane dehalogenase DmbC in the 9.31-ml fraction (C).The substrate specificities of DrbA and DmbC were investigated with a set of 30 selected chlorinated, brominated, and iodinated hydrocarbons. Standardized specific activities related to 1-chlorobutane (summarized in Table Table1)1) were compared with the activity profiles of other haloalkane dehalogenases (Fig. (Fig.4).4). DrbA and DmbC displayed similar activity patterns, with catalytic activities approximately two orders of magnitude lower than those of other known haloalkane dehalogenases (1, 5, 8-11, 13-16, 18, 20, 23). HLD-III subfamily enzymes showed a restricted specificity range and a preference for iodinated short-chain hydrocarbons. Both phenomena may be related to the composition of the catalytic pentad Asp-His-Asp+Asn-Trp, which is unique to the members of the HLD-III subfamily (3). The preference for substrates carrying an iodine substituent can be related to a pair of halide-binding residues and their spatial arrangement with the catalytic triad. These residues make up the catalytic pentad, playing a critical role in substrate binding, formation of the transition states, and the reaction intermediates of the dehalogenation reaction (12).Open in a separate windowFIG. 4.Substrate specificity profiles of DrbA, DmbC, and seven different biochemically characterized haloalkane dehalogenases. Activities were determined using a consistent set of 30 halogenated substrates (see Table Table1).1). Data were standardized by dividing each value by the sum of all activities determined for individual enzymes in order to mask the differences in absolute activities. Specific activities (in μmol·s−1·mg−1) with 1-chlorobutane are 0.0003 (DrbA), 0.0001 (DmbC), 0.0003 (DatA), 0.0133 (DbjA), 0.0010 (DbeA), 0.0128 (DhaA), 0.0231 (LinB), 0.0171 (DmbA), and 0.0117 (DhlA).

TABLE 1.

Specific activities of haloalkane dehalogenases DrbA and DmbC toward a set of 30 halogenated hydrocarbonsa
SubstrateDrbA
DmbC
Sp act (nmol product·s−1· mg−1 protein)Relative activity (%)Sp act (nmol product·s−1· mg−1 protein)Relative activity (%)
1-Chlorobutane0.2911000.122100
1-Chlorohexane0.129440.122100
1-Bromobutane0.081281.2211,000
1-Bromohexane0.181620.977800
1-Iodopropane0.143492.1981,800
1-Iodobutane0.5061742.5642,100
1-Iodohexane0.095330.244200
1,2-DichloroethaneNANANANA
1,3-DichloropropaneNANA0.01210
1,5-DichloropentaneNANA0.06150
1,2-Dibromoethane0.098340.855700
1,3-DibromopropaneNANA5.0074,100
1-Bromo-3-chloropropane0.00101.4651,200
1,3-Diiodopropane0.3581236.7165,500
2-Iodobutane0.0289NANA
1,2-DichloropropaneNANANANA
1,2-Dibromopropane0.148510.244200
2-Bromo-1-chloropropane0.091310.488400
1,2,3-TrichloropropaneNANANANA
Bis-(2-chloroethyl) etherNANANANA
ChlorocyclohexaneNANANANA
Bromocyclohexane0.0269NANA
(1-Bromomethyl)-cyclohexaneNANA0.08973
1-Bromo-2-chloroethane0.167570.11191
ChlorocyclopentaneNANANANA
4-Bromobutyronitrile0.200690.444364
1,2,3-TribromopropaneNANA0.222182
3-Chloro-2-methyl propeneNANANANA
2,3-Dichloropropene0.27695NANA
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane0.01030.04436
Open in a separate windowaNA, no activity detected.Substrates 1-iodobutane and 1,3-diiodopropane, identified as the best substrates for haloalkane dehalogenases DrbA and DmbC, were used for measuring the dependency of enzyme activity on temperature and for determination of the pH optima. DrbA exhibited the highest activity with 1-iodobutane at 50°C, although above this temperature, the enzyme rapidly became inactivated. DmbC showed the highest activity toward 1,3-diiodopropane at 40°C, which is similar to the temperature determined with the haloalkane dehalogenases DmbA and DmbB (45°C), isolated from the same species (10). Irrespective of the reaction temperature, DrbA showed the maximum activity at pH 9.15. DrbA kept 80% of its activity throughout a relatively wide range of pH values (pH 7.00 and 9.91) compared to DmbC, which showed a sharp maximum at pH 8.30. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics of DrbA and DmbC determined by isothermal titration microcalorimetry were investigated with 1-iodobutane, which is an iodinated analogue of 1-chlorobutane routinely used for characterization of haloalkane dehalogenases. The low magnitudes of the Michaelis constants (Km = 0.063 ± 0.003 mM for DrbA and 0.018 ± 0.001 mM for DmbC) suggest a high affinity of both enzymes for 1-iodobutane. The catalytic constants determined with 1-iodobutane (kcat = 0.128 ± 0.002 s−1 for DrbA and 0.0715 ± 0.0004 s−1 for DmbC) suggest that the low specific activities observed during substrate screening are not due to poor affinity but are instead due to a low conversion rate.The biochemical characteristics of purified DrbA and DmbC suggest that these proteins represent novel enzymes differing from previously characterized haloalkane dehalogenases by (i) their unique ability to form oligomers and (ii) low levels of dehalogenating activity with typical substrates of haloalkane dehalogenases. This study further illustrates how genome sequencing projects and phylogenetic analyses contribute to the identification of novel enzymes. Characterization of DrbA and DmbC, belonging to the subfamily HLD-III, partially filled a gap in the knowledge of the haloalkane dehalogenase family and provided an additional insight into evolutionary relationships among its members.  相似文献   

5.
Escherichia coli isolates (72 commensal and 10 O157:H7 isolates) were compared with regard to physiological and growth parameters related to their ability to survive and persist in the gastrointestinal tract and found to be similar. We propose that nonhuman hosts in E. coli O157:H7 strains function similarly to other E. coli strains in regard to attributes relevant to gastrointestinal colonization.Escherichia coli is well known for its ecological versatility (15). A life cycle which includes both gastrointestinal and environmental stages has been stressed by both Savageau (15) and Adamowicz et al. (1). The gastrointestinal stage would be subjected to acid and detergent stress. The environmental stage is implicit in E. coli having transport systems for fungal siderophores (4) as well as pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent periplasmic glucose utilization (1) because their presence indicates evolution in a location containing fungal siderophores and pyrroloquinoline quinone (1).Since its recognition as a food-borne pathogen, there have been numerous outbreaks of food-borne infection due to E. coli O157:H7, in both ground beef and vegetable crops (6, 13). Cattle are widely considered to be the primary reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 (14), but E. coli O157:H7 does not appear to cause disease in cattle. To what extent is E. coli O157:H7 physiologically unique compared to the other naturally occurring E. coli strains? We feel that the uniqueness of E. coli O157:H7 should be evaluated against a backdrop of other wild-type E. coli strains, and in this regard, we chose the 72-strain ECOR reference collection originally described by Ochman and Selander (10). These strains were chosen from a collection of 2,600 E. coli isolates to provide diversity with regard to host species, geographical distribution, and electromorph profiles at 11 enzyme loci (10).In our study we compared the 72 strains of the ECOR collection against 10 strains of E. coli O157:H7 and six strains of E. coli which had been in laboratory use for many years (Table (Table1).1). The in vitro comparisons were made with regard to factors potentially relevant to the bacteria''s ability to colonize animal guts, i.e., acid tolerance, detergent tolerance, and the presence of the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway (Table (Table2).2). Our longstanding interest in the ED pathway (11) derives in part from work by Paul Cohen''s group (16, 17) showing that the ED pathway is important for E. coli colonization of the mouse large intestine. Growth was assessed by replica plating 88 strains of E. coli under 40 conditions (Table (Table2).2). These included two LB controls (aerobic and anaerobic), 14 for detergent stress (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide [CTAB], and benzalkonium chloride, both aerobic and anaerobic), 16 for acid stress (pH 6.5, 6.0, 5.0, 4.6, 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, and 4.0), four for the ability to grow in a defined minimal medium (M63 glucose salts with and without thiamine), and four for the presence or absence of a functional ED pathway (M63 with gluconate or glucuronate). All tests were done with duplicate plates in two or three separate trials. The data are available in Tables S1 to S14 in the supplemental material, and they are summarized in Table Table22.

TABLE 1.

E. coli strains used in this study
E. coli strain (n)Source
ECOR strains (72)Thomas Whittman
Laboratory adapted (6)
    K-12 DavisPaul Blum
    CG5C 4401Paul Blum
    K-12 StanfordPaul Blum
    W3110Paul Blum
    BTyler Kokjohn
    AB 1157Tyler Kokjohn
O157:H7 (10)
    FRIK 528Andrew Benson
    ATCC 43895Andrew Benson
    MC 1061Andrew Benson
    C536Tim Cebula
    C503Tim Cebula
    C535Tim Cebula
    ATCC 43889William Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43890William Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43888Willaim Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43894William Cray, Jr.
Open in a separate window

TABLE 2.

Physiological comparison of 88 strains of Escherichia coli
Growth medium or conditionOxygencNo. of strains with type of growthb
ECOR strains (n = 72)
Laboratory strains (n = 6)
O157:H7 strains (n = 10)
GoodPoorNoneVariableGoodPoorNoneVariableGoodPoorNoneVariable
LB controlaBoth72000600010000
1% SDSAerobic6930060008002
5% SDSAerobic6840060008200
1% SDSAnaerobic53154023101702
5% SDSAnaerobic0684004200704
CTABd (all)Both00720006000100
0.05% BACAerobic31158202220091
0.2% BACAerobic01710105000100
0.05% BACAnaerobic2367001500091
0.2% BACAnaerobic00720006000100
pH 6.5Both72000600010000
pH 6Both72000600010000
pH 5Both7020060009001
pH 4.6Both70200600010000
pH 4.3Aerobic14015731203205
pH 4.3Anaerobic6930031201100
pH 4.1 or 4.2Aerobic00720NDgND
pH 4.0Both0072000600091
M63 with supplemente
    GlucoseAerobicf6912050109010
    GlucoseAnaerobicf7002050109010
    GluconateBoth6912050109010
    GlucuronateAerobic6822050109010
    GlucuronateAnaerobic6912050109010
Open in a separate windowaEight LB controls were run, two for each set of LB experiments: SDS, CTAB, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), and pH stress.bGrowth was measured as either +++, +, or 0 (good, poor, and none, respectively), with +++ being the growth achieved on the LB control plates. “Variable” means that two or three replicates did not agree. All experiments were done at 37°C.c“Anaerobic” refers to use of an Oxoid anaerobic chamber. Aerobic and anaerobic growth data are presented together when the results were identical and separately when the results were not the same or the anaerobic set had not been done. LB plates were measured after 1 (aerobic) or 2 (anaerobic) days, and the M63 plates were measured after 2 or 3 days.dCTAB used at 0.05, 0.2%, and 0.4%.eM63 defined medium (3) was supplemented with glucose, gluconate, or glucuronate, all at 0.2%.fIdentical results were obtained with and without 0.0001% thiamine.gND, not determined.  相似文献   

6.
7.
8.
All cultivated Thermotogales are thermophiles or hyperthermophiles. However, optimized 16S rRNA primers successfully amplified Thermotogales sequences from temperate hydrocarbon-impacted sites, mesothermic oil reservoirs, and enrichment cultures incubated at <46°C. We conclude that distinct Thermotogales lineages commonly inhabit low-temperature environments but may be underreported, likely due to “universal” 16S rRNA gene primer bias.Thermotogales, a bacterial group in which all cultivated members are anaerobic thermophiles or hyperthermophiles (5), are rarely detected in anoxic mesothermic environments, yet their presence in corresponding enrichment cultures, bioreactors, and fermentors has been observed using metagenomic methods and 16S rRNA gene amplification (6) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The most commonly detected lineage is informally designated here “mesotoga M1” (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). PCR experiments indicated that mesotoga M1 sequences amplified inconsistently using “universal” 16S rRNA gene primers, perhaps explaining their poor detection in DNA isolated from environmental samples (see text and Table S2 in the supplemental material). We therefore designed three 16S rRNA PCR primer sets (Table (Table1)1) targeting mesotoga M1 bacteria and their closest cultivated relative, Kosmotoga olearia. Primer set A was the most successful set, detecting a wider diversity of Thermotogales sequences than set B and being more Thermotogales-specific than primer set C (Table (Table22).

TABLE 1.

Primers targeting mesotoga M1 bacteria constructed and used in this study
PrimerSequence (5′ to 3′)Position in mesotoga 16S rRNA geneNo. of heterogeneity hot spotsaPotential primer match in other Thermotogales lineages
Primer set A1 (helix 17)
    NMes16S.286FCGGCCACAAGGAYACTGAGA286Perfect match in Kosmotoga olearia. The last 7 or 8 nucleotides at the 3′ end are conserved in other Thermotogales lineages.
    NMes16S.786RTGAACATCGTTTAGGGCCAG786One 5′ mismatch in Kosmotoga olearia and Petrotoga mobilis; 2-4 internal and 5′ mismatches in other lineages
Primer set BNone
    BaltD.42FATCACTGGGCGTAAAGGGAG540Perfect match in Kosmotoga olearia; one or two 3′ mismatches in most other Thermotogales lineages
    BaltD.494RGTGGTCGTTCCTCTTTCAAT992No match in other Thermotogaleslineages. The primer is located in heterogeneity hot spot helices 33 and 34. This primer also fails to amplify some mesotoga M1 sequences.
Primer set C9 (all 9 regions)
    TSSU-3FTATGGAGGGTTTGATCCTGG3Perfect match in Thermotoga spp., Kosmotoga olearia, and Petrotoga mobilis; two or three 5′ mismatches in other Thermotogales lineages; one 5′ mismatch to mesotoga M1 16S rRNA genes
    Mes16S.RACCAACTCGGGTGGCTTGAC1390One 5′ mismatch in Kosmotoga olearia; 1-3 internal or 5′ mismatches in other Thermotogales lineages
Open in a separate windowaHeterogeneity hot spots identified in reference 1.

TABLE 2.

Mesotoga clade sequences detected in environmental samples and enrichment cultures screened in this studya
Site (abbreviation)Temp in situ(°C)WaterfloodedEnvironmental samplesb
Enrichment cultures
Primer set A
Primer set B
Primer set C
Thermotogalesdetected by primer setc:
Lineage(s) detected
No. of OTUs (no. of clones)LineageNo. of OTUs (no. of clones)LineageNo. of OTUs (no. of clones)LineageABC
Sidney Tar Ponds sediment (TAR)TemperateNA1 (5)M11M1+++M1, M2, M5
Oil sands settling basin tailings (05mlsb)∼12dNA1 (6)M1+M1
Grosmont A produced water (GrosA)20No1 (15)M11 (22)M12 (14)M1+++M1
Foster Creek produced water (FC)14No1 (21)M11 (23)M11 (1)M1+NDM1
Oil field D wellhead water (DWH)e,f52-53gYes1 (14)Kosmotogai1 (6)M1i1 (1)KosmotogaiNANANANA
Oil field D FWKO water (DF)f,h20-30Yes1 (45)Kosmotogai1 (17)M1i++M1, Kosmotoga, Petrotoga
Oil field H FWKO water (HF)j30-32Yes7 (59)M1, M2, M3, M4, Kosmotoga1 (29)M1++M1, Petrotoga
Oil field H satellite water (HSAT)e,j41 and 50gYes1 (8)M12 (16)Kosmotoga, ThermotogaNANANANA
Oil field H wellhead water (HWH)e,j41 and 50gYesNANANANA+++M1, Petrotoga
Open in a separate windowaSee the supplemental material for site and methodological details. NA, not applicable; ND, not determined.bThe number of OTUs observed at a 0.01 distance cutoff is given for each primer set. The numbers of clones with Thermotogales sequences are in parentheses. —, PCR was attempted but no Thermotogales sequences were obtained or the PCR consistently failed.c+, sequence(s) detected; −, not detected. For more information on the enrichments, see the text and Table S3 in the supplemental material.dFrom April to May 2004, the temperature at the depth where the sample was taken was 12°C (7).eThere were no water samples from DWH and HSAT available for enrichment cultures, and no DNA was available from HWH.fThis reservoir has been treated with biocides; moreover, at this site, the water is filtered before being reinjected into the reservoir.gTemperatures of the oil pool where the water sample was obtained. The HSAT facility receives water from two oil pools, one at 41°C and one at 50°C.hWe screened DNA from samples taken in 2006 and 2008 but detected the same sequences in both, so sequences from the two samples were pooled.iThe mesotoga M1 and Kosmotoga sequences from DWH and DF were >99% similar and were assembled into one sequence in Fig. Fig.11.jThis reservoir has been injected with water from a neighboring oil reservoir.Since the putative mesophilic Thermotogales have been overwhelmingly associated with polluted and hydrocarbon-impacted environments and mesothermic oil reservoirs are the only natural environments where mesotoga M1 sequences previously were detected (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), we selected four oil reservoirs with in situ temperatures of 14°C to 53°C and two temperate, chronically hydrocarbon-impacted sites for analysis (Table (Table2).2). Total community DNA was extracted, the 16S rRNA genes were amplified, cloned, and sequenced as described in the supplemental material.  相似文献   

9.
10.
11.
Twelve cluster groups of Escherichia coli O26 isolates found in three cattle farms were monitored in space and time. Cluster analysis suggests that only some O26:H11 strains had the potential for long-term persistence in hosts and farms. As judged by their virulence markers, bovine enterohemorrhagic O26:H11 isolates may represent a considerable risk for human infection.Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains comprise a group of zoonotic enteric pathogens (42). In humans, infections with some STEC serotypes result in hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic diarrhea, which can be complicated by hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) (49). These STEC strains are also designated “enterohemorrhagic E. coli” (EHEC). Consequently, EHEC strains represent a subgroup of STEC with a high pathogenic potential for humans. Strains of the E. coli serogroup O26 were originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli due to their association with outbreaks of infantile diarrhea in the 1940s. In 1977, Konowalchuk et al. (37) recognized that these bacteria produced Stx, and 10 years later, the Stx-producing E. coli O26:H11/H− strains were classified as EHEC. EHEC O26 strains constitute the most common non-O157 EHEC group associated with diarrhea and HUS in Europe (12, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 55, 60). Reports on an association between EHEC O26 and HUS or diarrhea from North America including the United States (15, 30, 33), South America (51, 57), Australia (22), and Asia (31, 32) provide further evidence for the worldwide spread of these organisms. Studies in Germany and Austria (26, 27) on sporadic HUS cases between 1996 and 2003 found that EHEC O26 accounted for 14% of all EHEC strains and for ∼40% of non-O157 EHEC strains obtained from these patients. A proportion of 11% EHEC O26 strains was detected in a case-control study in Germany (59) between 2001 and 2003. In the age group <3 years, the number of EHEC O26 cases was nearly equal to that of EHEC O157 cases, although the incidence of EHEC O26-associated disease is probably underestimated because of diagnostic limitations in comparison to the diagnosis of O157:H7/H− (18, 34). Moreover, EHEC O26 has spread globally (35). Beutin (6) described EHEC O26:H11/H−, among O103:H2, O111:H, O145:H28/H−, and O157:H7/H−, as the well-known pathogenic “gang of five,” and Bettelheim (5) warned that we ignore the non-O157 STEC strains at our peril.EHEC O26 strains produce Stx1, Stx2, or both (15, 63). Moreover, these strains contain the intimin-encoding eae gene (11, 63), a characteristic feature of EHEC (44). In addition, EHEC strains possess other markers associated with virulence, such as a large plasmid that carries further potential virulence genes, e.g., genes coding for EHEC hemolysin (EHEC-hlyA), a catalase-peroxidase (katP), and an extracellular serine protease (espP) (17, 52). The efa1 (E. coli factor for adherence 1) gene was identified as an intestinal colonization factor in EHEC (43). EHEC O26 represents a highly dynamic group of organisms that rapidly generate new pathogenic clones (7, 8, 63).Ruminants, especially cattle, are considered the primary reservoir for human infections with EHEC. Therefore, the aim of this study was the molecular characterization of bovine E. coli field isolates of serogroup O26 using a panel of typical virulence markers. The epidemiological situation in the beef herds from which the isolates were obtained and the spatial and temporal behavior of the clonal distribution of E. coli serogroup O26 were analyzed during the observation period. The potential risk of the isolates inducing disease in humans was assessed.In our study, 56 bovine E. coli O26:H11 isolates and one bovine O26:H32 isolate were analyzed for EHEC virulence-associated factors. The isolates had been obtained from three different beef farms during a long-term study. They were detected in eight different cattle in farm A over a period of 15 months (detected on 10 sampling days), in 3 different animals in farm C over a period of 8 months (detected on 3 sampling days), and in one cow on one sampling day in farm D (Table (Table1)1) (28).

TABLE 1.

Typing of E. coli O26 isolates
Sampling day, source, and isolateSerotypeVirulence profile by:
fliC PCR-RFLPstx1 genestx2 geneStx1 (toxin)Stx2 (toxin)Subtype(s)
efa1 genebEHEC-hlyA genekatP geneespP genePlasmid size(s) in kbCluster
stx1/stx2eaetirespAespB
Day 15
    Animal 6 (farm A)
        WH-01/06/002-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/06/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/06/002-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
    Animal 8 (farm A)
        WH-01/08/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
    Animal 26 (farm A)
        WH-01/26/001-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 127
        WH-01/26/001-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/26/001-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/26/001-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+++110, 127
Day 29
    Animal 2 (farm A)
        WH-01/02/003-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ−/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-9O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++1106
        WH-01/02/003-10O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++1106
    Animal 26 (farm A)
        WH-01/26/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-9O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++110, 125
        WH-01/26/002-10O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
Day 64
    Animal 20 (farm A)
        WH-01/20/005-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+130, 2.52
Day 78
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/002-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++130, 12, 2.54
Day 106
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/005-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+++145, 110, 123
        WH-01/27/005-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.55
        WH-01/27/005-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+130, 12, 2.55
Day 113
    Animal 7 (farm C)
        WH-04/07/001-2O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/+++55, 35, 2.511
        WH-04/07/001-4O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++5512
        WH-04/07/001-6O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++5512
Day 170
    Animal 22 (farm C)
        WH-04/22/001-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
        WH-04/22/001-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
        WH-04/22/001-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
Day 176
    Animal 14 (farm D)
        WH-03/14/004-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+++11010
Day 218
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/009-1O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/009-2O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/009-3O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/009-8O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++110, 128
        WH-01/27/009-9O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
Day 309
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/010-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 35, 124
        WH-01/29/010-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++130, 55, 358
        WH-01/29/010-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 35, 128
Day 365
    Animal 8 (farm C)
        WH-04/08/008-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 5512
Day 379
    Animal 9 (farm A)
        WH-01/09/016-2O26:H32H32++stx1/stx2−/−145, 130, 1.81
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/014-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/014-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/014-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 128
Day 407
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/013-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 2.58
        WH-01/29/013-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 2.58
Day 478
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/017-1O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/017-5O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/017-6O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++1108
        WH-01/27/017-7O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++1108
        WH-01/27/017-10O26:H11H11+++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.58
Open in a separate windowastx1/stx2, gene stx1 or stx2.befa1 was detected by two hybridizations (with lifA1-lifA2 and lifA3-lifA4 probes). +/+, complete gene; +/− or −/+, incomplete gene; −/−, efa1 negative.The serotyping of the O26 isolates was confirmed by the results of the fliC PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis performed according to Fields et al. (25), with slight modifications described by Zhang et al. (62). All O26:H11 isolates showed the H11 pattern described by Zhang et al. (62). In contrast, the O26:H32 isolate demonstrated a different fliC RFLP pattern that was identical to the H32 pattern described by the same authors. It has been demonstrated that EHEC O26:H11 strains belong to at least four different sequence types (STs) in the common clone complex 29 (39). In the multilocus sequence typing analysis for E. coli (61), the tested five EHEC O26:H11 isolates (WH-01/02/003-1, WH-01/20/005-3, WH-01/27/009-9, WH-03/14/004-8, and WH-04/22/001-1) of different farms and clusters were characterized as two sequence types (ST 21 and ST 396). The isolates from farms A and C belong to ST 21, the most frequent ST of EHEC O26:H11 isolates found in humans and animals (39), but the single isolate from farm D was characterized as ST 396.Typing and subtyping of genes (stx1 and/or stx2, eae, tir, espA, espB, EHEC-hlyA, katP, and espP) associated with EHEC were performed with LightCycler fluorescence PCR (48) and different block-cycler PCRs. To identify the subtypes of the stx2 genes and of the locus of enterocyte effacement-encoding genes eae, tir, espA, and espB, the PCR products were digested by different restriction endonucleases (19, 26, 46). The complete pattern of virulence markers was detected in most bovine isolates examined in our study. An stx1 gene was present in all O26 isolates. In addition, an stx2 gene was found in nine O26:H11 isolates in farm A and in three isolates of the same type in farm C, as well as in the O26:H32 isolate. Both Stx1 and Stx2 were closely related to families of Stx1 and Stx2 variants or alleles. EHEC isolates with stx2 genes are significantly more often associated with HUS and other severe disease manifestations than isolates with an stx1 gene, which are more frequently associated with uncomplicated diarrhea and healthy individuals (13). In contrast to STEC strains harboring stx2 gene variants, however, STEC strains of the stx2 genotype were statistically significantly associated with HUS (26). The stx2 genotype was found in all O26 isolates with an stx2 gene, while the GK3/GK4 amplification products after digestion with HaeIII and FokI restriction enzymes showed the typical pattern for this genotype described by Friedrich et al. (26). The nucleotide sequences of the A and B subunits of the stx2 gene of the selected bovine O26:H11 isolate WH-01/27/017-1 (GenBank accession no. EU700491) were identical to the stx2 genes of different sorbitol-fermenting EHEC O157:H− strains associated with human HUS cases and other EHEC infections in Germany (10) and 99.3% identical in their DNA sequences to the stx2 gene of the EHEC type strain EDL933, a typical O157:H7 isolate from an HUS patient. A characteristic stx1 genotype was present in all O26 isolates. The nucleotide sequences of the A and B subunits of the stx1 gene of the tested bovine O26:H11 isolate WH-01/27/017-1 (GenBank accession no. EU700490) were nearly identical to those of the stx1 genes of the EHEC O26:H11 reference type strains H19 and DEC10B, which had been associated with human disease outbreaks in Canada and Australia. Nucleotide exchanges typical for stx1c and stx1d subtypes as described by Kuczius et al. (38) were not found. All bovine O26:H11 strains produced an Stx1 with high cytotoxicity for Vero cells tested by Stx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Vero cell neutralization assay (53). The Stx2 cytotoxicity for Vero cells was also very high in the O26:H11 isolates.Not only factors influencing the basic and inducible Stx production are important in STEC pathogenesis. It has been suggested that the eae and EHEC-hlyA genes are likely contributors to STEC pathogenicity (2, 3, 13, 50). Ritchie et al. (50) found both genes in all analyzed HUS-associated STEC isolates. In all O26:H11 isolates we obtained, stx genes were present in combination with eae genes. Only the O26:H32 isolate lacked an eae gene. To date, 10 distinct variants of eae have been described (1, 19, 36, 45, 47). Some serotypes were closely associated with a particular intimin variant: the O157 serogroup was linked to γ-eae, the O26 serogroup to β-eae, and the O103 serogroup to ɛ-eae (4, 19, 20, 58). Our study confirms these associations. All bovine O26:H11 isolates were also typed as members of the β-eae subgroup. A translocated intimin receptor gene (tir gene) and the type III secreted proteins encoded by the espA and espB genes were found in all 56 O26:H11 isolates but not in the O26:H32 isolate. These other tested locus of enterocyte effacement-associated genes belonged to the β-subgroups. These results are in accord with the results of China et al. (19), who detected the pathotypes β-eae, β-tir, β-espA, and β-espB in all investigated human O26 strains. Like the eae gene, the EHEC-hlyA gene was found in association with severe clinical disease in humans (52). Aldick et al. (2) showed that EHEC hemolysin is toxic (cytolytic) to human microvascular endothelial cells and may thus contribute to the pathogenesis of HUS. In our study, the EHEC-hlyA gene was detected in 50 of the 56 bovine E. coli O26:H11 isolates which harbored virulence-associated plasmids of different sizes (Table (Table1).1). The presence of virulence-associated plasmids corresponded to the occurrence of additional virulence markers such as the espP and katP genes (17). The katP gene and the espP gene were detected in 49 and 50 of the 56 O26:H11 isolates, respectively. The espP gene was missing in six of the seven bovine O26:H11 isolates in which the katP genes were also absent. Both genes were not found in the O26:H32 isolate (Table (Table1).1). Although we found large plasmids of the same size in O26:H11 isolates, they lacked one or more of the plasmid-associated virulence factors (Table (Table1).1). Two DNA probes were used to detect the efa1 genes by colony hybridization. (DNA probes were labeled with digoxigenin [DIG] with lifA1-lifA2 and lifA3-lifA4 primers [14] using the PCR DIG probe synthesis kit [Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany]; DIG Easy Hyb solution [Roche] was used for prehybridization and hybridization.) Positive results with both DNA probes were obtained for 52 of 56 E. coli O26:H11 isolates. A positive signal was only found in three isolates with the lifA1-lifA2 DNA probe and in one isolate with the lifA3-lifA4 probe. An efa1 gene was not detected in the O26:H32 isolate (Table (Table11).We also analyzed the spatial and temporal behavior of the O26:H11/H32 isolates in the beef herds by cluster analysis (conducted in PAUP* for Windows version 4.0, 2008 [http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/about.html]). This was performed with distance matrices using the neighbor-joining algorithm, an agglomerative cluster method which generates a phylogenetic tree. The distance matrices were calculated by pairwise comparisons of the fragmentation patterns produced by genomic typing through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis with four restriction endonucleases (XbaI, NotI, BlnI, and SpeI) and the presence or absence of potential virulence markers (Fig. (Fig.11 and Table Table1).1). To this end, the total character difference was used, which counts the pairwise differences between two given patterns. During a monitoring program of 3 years in four cattle farms (29), different O26:H11 cluster groups and one O26:H32 isolate were detected in three different farms. The genetic distance of the O26:H32 isolate was very high relative to the O26:H11 isolates. Therefore, the O26:H32 isolate was outgrouped. The O26:H11 isolates of each farm represented independent cluster groups. The single isolate from farm D fitted better to the isolates from farm C than to those from farm A. This finding is in accord with the geographical distance between the farms. The fact that the farms were located in neighboring villages may suggest that direct or indirect connections between the farms were possible (e.g., by person contacts or animal trade). However, the isolates from farm C and farm D belonged to different sequence types (ST 21 and ST 396), which may argue against a direct connection. Interestingly, O26:H11 isolates with and without stx2 genes were detected in the same clusters. This phenomenon was observed in both farm A and farm C. In farm A, the isolates with additional stx2 genes were found in animal 27 and were grouped in clusters 8 and 9 (day 218). An stx2 gene was repeatedly found (four isolates) in the same animal (animal 27). The isolates grouped in cluster 8 on a later day of sampling (day 478). All other O26:H11 isolates grouped in the same clusters and obtained from the same animals (27 and 29) on different sampling days lacked an stx2 gene. Also, the isolates obtained from animal 27 on previous sampling days, which grouped in clusters 3 and 5, exhibited no stx2 genes. In farm C, the three isolates with additional stx2 genes obtained from animal 7 grouped in clusters 11 and 12. An stx2 gene was absent from all other O26:H11 isolates grouped in the same cluster 12 on later sampling days, and no other isolates of cluster 11 were found later on. However, we detected members of many clusters over relatively long periods (clusters 5, 8, and 9 in farm A and cluster 12 in farm C), but members of other clusters were only found on single occasions. This patchy temporal pattern is apparently not a unique property of O26:H11, as we found similar results for cluster groups of other EHEC serotypes of bovine origin (28). The isolates grouped in the dominant cluster 8 were found on 5 of 9 sampling days over a period of 10 months. In contrast, we found the members of clusters 4, 5, 9, and 12 only on two nonconsecutive sampling days. The period during which isolates of these groups were not detected was particularly long for cluster 4 (231 days). We also observed the coexistence of different clusters over long periods in the same farm and in the same cattle (clusters 8 and 9), while one of the clusters dominated. Transmission of clusters between cattle was also observed. These results suggest that some of the EHEC O26:H11 strains had the potential for a longer persistence in the host population, while others had not. The reasons for this difference are not yet clear. Perhaps the incomplete efa1 gene found in isolates of clusters which were only detected once might explain why some strains disappeared rapidly. Efa1 has been discussed as a potential E. coli colonization factor for the bovine intestine used by non-O157 STEC, including O26 (54, 56). The O165:H25 cluster detected during a longer period in farm B may have disappeared after it had lost its efa1 gene (28). The precise biological activity of Efa1 in EHEC O26 is not yet known, but it has been demonstrated that the molecule is a non-Stx virulence determinant which can increase the virulence of EHEC O26 in humans (8).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Neighbor-joining tree of bovine E. coli O26:H11/H32 strains based on the restriction pattern obtained after digestion with XbaI, NotI, BlnI, and SpeI.We distinguished 12 different clusters, but complete genetic identity was only found in two isolates. The variations in the O26:H11 clusters may be due to increasing competition between the bacterial populations of the various subtypes in the bovine intestine or to potential interactions between EHEC O26:H11 and the host.The ephemeral occurrence of additional stx2 genes in different clusters and farms may be the result of recombination events due to horizontal gene transfer (16). The loss of stx genes may occur rapidly in the course of an infection, but the reincorporation by induction of an stx-carrying bacteriophage into the O26:H11 strains is possible at any time (9, 40). Nevertheless, an additional stx2 gene may increase the dangerousness of the respective EHEC O26:H11 strains. While all patients involved in an outbreak caused by an EHEC O26:H11 strain harboring the gene encoding Stx2 developed HUS (41), the persons affected by another outbreak caused by an EHEC O26:H11 strain that produced exclusively Stx1 had only uncomplicated diarrhea (60).In conclusion, our results showed that bovine O26:H11 isolates can carry virulence factors of EHEC that are strongly associated with EHEC-related disease in humans, particularly with severe clinical manifestations such as hemorrhagic colitis and HUS. Therefore, strains of bovine origin may represent a considerable risk for human infection. Moreover, some clusters of EHEC O26:H11 persisted in cattle and farms over longer periods, which may increase the risk of transmission to other animals and humans even further.  相似文献   

12.
Vertebrate genomic assemblies were analyzed for endogenous sequences related to any known viruses with single-stranded DNA genomes. Numerous high-confidence examples related to the Circoviridae and two genera in the family Parvoviridae, the parvoviruses and dependoviruses, were found and were broadly distributed among 31 of the 49 vertebrate species tested. Our analyses indicate that the ages of both virus families may exceed 40 to 50 million years. Shared features of the replication strategies of these viruses may explain the high incidence of the integrations.It has long been appreciated that retroviruses can contribute significantly to the genetic makeup of host organisms. Genes related to certain other viruses with single-stranded RNA genomes, formerly considered to be most unlikely candidates for such contribution, have recently been detected throughout the vertebrate phylogenetic tree (1, 6, 13). Here, we report that viruses with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genomes have also contributed to the genetic makeup of many organisms, stretching back as far as the Paleocene period and possibly the late Cretaceous period of evolution.Determining the evolutionary ages of viruses can be problematic, as their mutation rates may be high and their replication may be rapid but also sporadic. To establish a lower age limit for currently circulating ssDNA viruses, we analyzed 49 published vertebrate genomic assemblies for the presence of sequences derived from the NCBI RefSeq database of 2,382 proteins from known viruses in this category, representing a total of 23 classified genera from 7 virus families. Our survey uncovered numerous high-confidence examples of endogenous sequences related to the Circoviridae and to two genera in the family Parvoviridae: the parvoviruses and dependoviruses (Fig. (Fig.11).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Phylogenetic tree of vertebrate organisms and history of ssDNA virus integrations. Times of integration of ancestral dependoviruses (yellow icosahedrons), parvoviruses (blue icosahedrons), and circoviruses (triangles) are approximate.The Dependovirus and Parvovirus genomes are typically 4 to 6 kb in length, include 2 major open reading frames (encoding replicase proteins [Rep and NS1, respectively] and capsid proteins [Cap and VP1, respectively]), and have characteristic hairpin structures at both ends (Fig. (Fig.2).2). For replication, these viruses depend on host enzymes that are recruited by the viral replicase proteins to the hairpin regions, where self-primed viral DNA synthesis is initiated (2). Circovirus genomes are typically ∼2-kb circles. DNA of the type species, porcine circovirus 1 (PCV-1), contains a stem-loop structure within the origin of replication (Fig. (Fig.2),2), and the largest open reading frame includes sequences that are homologous to the Parvovirus replicase open reading frame (9, 11). The circoviruses also depend on host enzymes for replication, and DNA synthesis is self-primed from a 3′-OH end formed by endonucleolytic cleavage of the stem-loop structure (4). The frequency of Dependovirus infection is estimated to be as high as 90% within an individual''s lifetime. None of the dependoviruses have been associated with human disease, but related viruses in the family Parvoviridae (e.g., erythrovirus B19 and possibly human bocavirus) are pathogenic for humans, and members of both the Parvoviridae and the Circoviridae can cause a variety of animal diseases (2, 4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Schematics illustrating the structure and organization of Parvoviridae and Circoviridae genomes and origins of several of the longest-integrated ancestral viral sequences found in vertebrates. Integrations were aligned to the Dependovirus adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2), the Parvovirus minute virus of mice (MVM), and the Circovirus porcine circovirus 1 (PCV-1). The inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences in the Dependovirus and Parvovirus genomes are depicted on an expanded scale. A linear representation of the circular genome of PCV-1 is shown with the 10-bp stem-loop structure on an expanded scale. Horizontal lines beneath the maps indicate the lengths of similar sequences that could be identified by BLAST. The numbers indicate the locations of amino acids in the viral proteins where the sequence similarities in the endogenous insertions start and end. The actual ancestral virus-derived integrated sequences may extend beyond the indicated regions.With some ancestral endogenous sequences that we identified, phylogenetic comparisons can be used to estimate age. For example, as a Dependovirus-like sequence is present at the same location in the genomes of mice and rats, the ancestral virus must have existed before their divergence, more than 20 million years ago. Some Circovirus- and Dependovirus-related integrations also predate the split between dog and panda, about 42 million years ago. However, in most other cases, we rely on an indirect method for estimating age (1). As genomic sequences evolve, they accumulate new stop codons and insertion/deletion-induced frameshifts. The rates of these events can be tied directly to the rates of neutral sequence drift and, therefore, the time of evolution. To apply this method, we first performed a BLAST search of vertebrate genomes for all known ssDNA virus proteins (BLAST options, -p tblastn -M BLOSUM62 -e 1e−4). Candidate sequences were then recorded, along with 5 kb of flanking regions, and then again aligned against the database of ssDNA viruses to find the most complete alignment (BLAST options, -t blastx -F F -w 15 -t 1500 -Z 150 -G 13 -E 1 -e 1e−2). Detected alignments were then compared with a neutral model of genome evolution, as described in the supplemental material, and the numbers of stop codons and frameshifts were converted into the expected genomic drift undergone by the sequences. The age of integration was then estimated from the known phylogeny of vertebrates (7, 10). Using these methods, we discovered that as many as 110 ssDNA virus-related sequences have been integrated into the 49 vertebrate genomes considered, during a time period ranging from the present to over 40 to 60 million years ago (Table (Table1;1; see also Tables S1 to S3 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 1.

Selected endogenous sequences in vertebrate genomes related to single-stranded DNA viruses
Virus group and vertebrate speciesInitial genomic search using TBLASTN
Best sequence homology identified using BLASTX
Predicted nucleotide drift (%)Integration labelAge (million yr) or timing of integration based on sequence aging
Chromosomal or scaffold locationProteinBLAST E value/% sequence identityMost similar virusaProteinCoordinatesNo. of stop codons/frameshifts
Circoviruses
    CatScaffold_62068Rep6E−05/37Canary circovirusRep4-2833/7 in 268 aab14.2fcECLG-182
Scaffold_24038Rep6E−06/51Columbid circovirusRep44-3174/5 in 231 aac15.2fcECLG-287
    DogChr5dRep7E−16/46Raven circovirusRep16-2636/5 in 250 aa17.6cfECLG-198
Chr22Rep1E−14/43Beak and feather disease virusRep7-2642/1 in 261 aac4.5cfECLG-254
    OpossumChr3Rep4E−46/44Finch circovirusRep2-2910/2 in 282 aa2.3mdECLG12
Cap6-360/0 in 30 aa
Dependoviruses
    DogChrXRep6E−05/55AAV5Rep239-4453/4 in 200 aa14.0cfEDLG-178
    DolphinGeneScaffold1475Rep8E−39/39Avian AAV DA1Rep79-4863/4 in 379 aac6.6ttEDLG-255
Cap4E−61/47Cap1-7384/7 in 678 aac
    ElephantScaffold_4Rep0/55AAV5Rep3-5890/0 in 579 aa0.0laEDLGRecent
    HyraxGeneScaffold5020Cap3E−34/53AAV3Cap485-7350/5 in 256 aa7.0pcEDLG-129
Scaffold_19252Rep9E−72/47Bovine AAVRep2-3488/4 in 348 aa14.3pcEDLG-260
    MegabatScaffold_5601Rep2E−13/31AAV2Rep315-4791/5 in 175 aa13.1pvEDLG-376
    MicrobatGeneScaffold2026Rep1E−117/50AAV2Rep1-6172/5 in 612 aa5.8mlEDLG-127
Cap9E−33/51Cap1-7312/9 in 509 aac
Scaffold_146492Cap6E−32/42AAV2Cap479-7320/3 in 252 aa4.2mlEDLG-219
    MouseChr1Rep2E−06/34AAV2Rep4-2063/5 in 191 aa17.1mmEDLG-139
Chr3Rep2E−24/31AAV5Rep71-47812/7 in 389 aa16.5mmEDLG-237
Cap2E−22/45Cap22-72412/10 in 649aac
Chr8Rep1E−08/46AAV2Rep314-4733/3 in 147 aa13.8mmEDLG-331
Cap1-1371/2 in 114 aa
    PandaScaffold2359Rep2E−06/37Bovine AAVRep238-4262/3 in 186 aa10.4amEDLG-159
    PikaScaffold_9941Rep4E−14/28AAV5Rep126-4152/2 in 282 aa5.4opEDLG14
    PlatypusChr2Rep9E−10/35Bovine AAVRep297-4374/3 in 138 aa17.1oaEDLG-179
Cap272-4191/2 in 150 aac
Contig12430Rep2E−09/47Bovine AAVRep353-4503/1 in 123 aa12.0oaEDLG-255
Cap2E−05/32Cap253-3672/1 in 116 aa
    RabbitChr10Rep3E−97/39AAV2Rep1-6193/9 in 613 aa9.3ocEDLG43
Cap5E−50/45Cap1-72310/9 in 675 aa
    RatChr13Rep2E−09/33AAV2Rep4-1752/4 in 177 aa13.3rnEDLG-128
Chr2Rep4E−18/40AAV5Rep1-46112/12 in 454 aa22.7rnEDLG-251
Chr19Rep2E−07/33AAV5Rep329-4642/4 in 136 aa16.1rnEDLG-335
Cap31-1332/1 in 93 aa
    TarsierScaffold_178326Rep4E−14/23AAV5Rep96-4652/3 in 356 aa5.3tsEDLG23
Parvoviruses
    Guinea pigScaffold_188Rep3E−24/46Porcine parvovirusRep313-5675/3 in 250 aa12.3cpEPLG-140
Cap1E−16/36Cap10-68911/12 in 672 aa
Scaffold_27Rep1E−50/39Canine parvovirusRep11-6401/4 in 616 aa5.3cpEPLG-217
Cap1E−38/39Porcine parvovirusCap3-7192/14 in 700 aa
    TenrecScaffold_260946Rep2E−20/38LuIII virusRep406-5984/4 in 190 aa19.0etEPLG-260
Cap11-63916/15 in 595 aa
    RatChr5Rep6E−10/56Canine parvovirusRep1-2820/0 in 312 aa0.6rnEPLGRecent
Cap0/62Cap637-6670/2 in 760 aa
Rep0/631-751
    OpossumChr3Rep2E−39/33LuIII virusRep7-57011/3 in 502 aa10.9mdEPLG-256
Cap7E−8/33Cap11-72914/7 in 704 aa
Chr6Rep6E−58/44Porcine parvovirusRep16-5633/7 in 534 aac4.6mdEPLG-324
Cap6E−60/38Cap10-7152/5 in 707 aac
    WallabyScaffold_108040Rep4E−74/62Canine parvovirusRep341-6450/0 in 287 aa1.3meEPLG-37
Cap8E−37/32Cap35-7380/4 in 687 aa
Scaffold_72496Rep2E−61/42Porcine parvovirusRep23-5674/3 in 531 aa5.7meEPLG-630
Cap2E−31/38Cap10-5326/4 in 514 aa
Scaffold_88340Rep7E−37/55Mouse parvovirus 1Rep344-5660/3 in 223 aa6.7meEPLG-1636
Cap7E−22/33Cap11-7136/9 in 700 aa
Open in a separate windowaSome ambiguity in choosing the most similar virus is possible. We generally used the alignment with the lowest E value in the BLAST results. However, one or two points in the exponent of an E value were sometimes sacrificed to achieve a longer sequence alignment.baa, amino acids.cThese sequences have long insertions compared to the present-day viruses. In all cases tested, these insertions originated from short interspersed elements (SINEs). These insertions were excluded from the counts of stop codons and frameshifts and the estimation of integration age.dChr, chromosome.It is important to recognize that there is an intrinsic limit on how far back in time we can reach to identify ancient endogenous viral sequences. First, the sequences must be identified with confidence by BLAST or similar programs. This requirement places a lower limit on sequence identity at about 20 to 30% of amino acids, or about 75% of nucleotides (nucleotides evolve nearly 2.5 times slower than the amino acid sequence they encode). Second, the related, present-day virus must have evolved at a rate that is not much higher than that of the endogenous sequences. The viruses for which ancestral endogenous sequences were identified in this study exhibit sequence drift similar to that associated with mammalian genomes. Setting this rate at 0.14% per million years of evolution (8), we arrive at 90 million years as the theoretical limit for the oldest sequences that can be identified using our methods. This limit drops to less than 35 million years for endogenous viral sequences in rodents and even lower for sequences related to viruses that evolve faster than mammalian genomes.The most widespread integrations found in our survey are derived from the dependoviruses. These include nearly complete genomes related to adeno-associated virus (AAV) in microbat, wallaby, dolphin, rabbit, mouse, and baboon (Fig. (Fig.2).2). We did not detect inverted terminal repeats in several integrations tested, even though repeats are common in the present-day dependoviruses. This result could be explained by sequence decay or the absence of such structures in the ancestral viruses. However, we do see sequences that resemble degraded hairpin structures to which Dependovirus Rep proteins bind, with an example from microbat integration mlEDLG-1 shown in Fig. Fig.3.3. The second most widespread endogenous sequences are related to the parvoviruses. They are found in 6 of 49 vertebrate species considered, with nearly complete genomes in rat, opossum, wallaby, and guinea pig (Fig. (Fig.22).Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Hairpin structure of the inverted terminal repeat of adeno-associated virus 2 (left) and a candidate degraded hairpin structure located close to the 5′ end of the mlEDLG-1 integration in microbats (right). Structures and mountain plots were generated using default parameters of the RNAfold program (5), with nucleotide coloring representing base-pairing probabilities: blue is below average, green is average, and red is above average. Mountain plots represent hairpin structures based on minimum free energy (mfe) calculations and partition function (pf) calculations, as well as the centroid structure (5). Height is expressed in numbers of nucleotides; position represents nucleotide.The Dependovirus AAV2 has strong bias for integration into human chromosome 19 during infection, driven by a host sequence that is recognized by the viral Rep protein(s). Rep mediates the formation of a synapse between viral and cellular sequences, and the cellular sequences are nicked to serve as an origin of viral replication (14). The related integrations in mice and rats, located in the same chromosomal locations, might be explained by such a mechanism. However, the extent of endogenous sequence decay and the frequency of stop codons indicate that these integrations occurred some 30 to 35 million years ago, implying that they are derived from a single event in a rodent ancestor rather than two independent integration events at the same location. Similarly, integrations EDLG-1 in dog and panda lie in chromosomal regions that can be readily aligned (based on University of California—Santa Cruz [UCSC] genome assemblies) and show sequence decay consistent with the age of the common ancestor, about 42 million years. Endogenous sequences related to the family Parvoviridae can thus be traced to over 40 million years back in time, and viral proteins related to this family have remained over 40% conserved.Sequences related to circoviruses were detected in five vertebrate species (Table (Table11 and Table S1 in the supplemental material). At least one of these sequences, the endogenous sequence in opossum, likely represents a recent integration. Several integrations in dog, cat, and panda, on the other hand, appear to date from at least 42 million years ago, which is the last time when pandas and dogs shared a common ancestor. We see evidence for this age in data from sequence degradation (Table (Table1),1), phylogenetic analyses of endogenous Circovirus-like genomes (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), and genomic synteny where integration ECLG-3 is surrounded by genes MTA3 and ARID5A in both dog and panda and integration ECLG-2 lies 35 to 43 kb downstream of gene UPF3A. In fact, Circovirus integrations may even precede the split between dogs and cats, about 55 million years ago, although the preliminary assembly and short genomic contigs for cats make synteny analysis impossible.The most common Circovirus-related sequences detected in vertebrate genomes are derived from the rep gene. We speculate that, like those of the Parvoviridae, the ancestral Circoviridae sequences might have been copied using a primer sequence in the host DNA that resembled the viral origin and was therefore recognized by the virus Rep protein. Higher incidence of rep gene identifications may represent higher conservation of this gene with time, or alternatively, possession of these sequences may impart some selective advantage to the host species. The largest Circovirus-related integration detected, in the opossum, comprises a short fragment of what may have been the cap gene immediately adjacent to and in the opposite orientation from the rep gene. This organization is similar to that of the present day Circovirus genome in which these genes share a promoter in the hairpin regions but are translated in opposite directions (Fig. (Fig.22).In summary, our results indicate that sequences derived from ancestral members of the families Parvoviridae and Circoviridae were integrated into their host''s genomes over the past 50 million years of evolution. Features of their replication strategies suggest mechanisms by which such integrations may have occurred. It is possible that some of the endogenous viral sequences could offer a selective advantage to the virus or the host. We note that rep open reading frame-derived proteins from some members of these families kill tumor cells selectively (3, 12). The genomic “fossils” we have discovered provide a unique glimpse into virus evolution but can give us only a lower estimate of the actual ages of these families. However, numerous recent integrations suggest that their germ line transfer has been continuing into present times.   相似文献   

13.
14.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific CD8+ T cells in persistent HCV infection are low in frequency and paradoxically show a phenotype associated with controlled infections, expressing the memory marker CD127. We addressed to what extent this phenotype is dependent on the presence of cognate antigen. We analyzed virus-specific responses in acute and chronic HCV infections and sequenced autologous virus. We show that CD127 expression is associated with decreased antigenic stimulation after either viral clearance or viral variation. Our data indicate that most CD8 T-cell responses in chronic HCV infection do not target the circulating virus and that the appearance of HCV-specific CD127+ T cells is driven by viral variation.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) persists in the majority of acutely infected individuals, potentially leading to chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The cellular immune response has been shown to play a significant role in viral control and protection from liver disease. Phenotypic and functional studies of virus-specific T cells have attempted to define the determinants of a successful versus an unsuccessful T-cell response in viral infections (10). So far these studies have failed to identify consistent distinguishing features between a T-cell response that results in self-limiting versus chronic HCV infection; similarly, the impact of viral persistence on HCV-specific memory T-cell formation is poorly understood.Interleukin-7 (IL-7) receptor alpha chain (CD127) is a key molecule associated with the maintenance of memory T-cell populations. Expression of CD127 on CD8 T cells is typically only observed when the respective antigen is controlled and in the presence of significant CD4+ T-cell help (9). Accordingly, cells specific for persistent viruses (e.g., HIV, cytomegalovirus [CMV], and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]) have been shown to express low levels of CD127 (6, 12, 14) and to be dependent on antigen restimulation for their maintenance. In contrast, T cells specific for acute resolving virus infections, such as influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and vaccinia virus typically acquire expression of CD127 rapidly with the control of viremia (5, 12, 14). Results for HCV have been inconclusive. The expected increase in CD127 levels in acute resolving but not acute persisting infection has been found, while a substantial proportion of cells with high CD127 expression have been observed in long-established chronic infection (2). We tried to reconcile these observations by studying both subjects with acute and chronic HCV infection and identified the presence of antigen as the determinant of CD127 expression.Using HLA-peptide multimers we analyzed CD8+ HCV-specific T-cell responses and CD127 expression levels in acute and chronic HCV infection. We assessed a cohort of 18 chronically infected subjects as well as 9 individuals with previously resolved infection. In addition, we longitudinally studied 9 acutely infected subjects (5 individuals who resolved infection spontaneously and 4 individuals who remain chronically infected) (Tables (Tables11 and and2).2). Informed consent in writing was obtained from each patient, and the study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as reflected in a priori approval from the local institutional review boards. HLA-multimeric complexes were obtained commercially from Proimmune (Oxford, United Kingdom) and Beckman Coulter (CA). The staining and analysis procedure was as described previously (10). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were stained with the following antibodies: CD3 from Caltag; CD8, CD27, CCR7, CD127, and CD38 from BD Pharmingen; and PD-1 (kindly provided by Gordon Freeman). Primer sets were designed for different genotypes based on alignments of all available sequences from the public HCV database (http://hcvpub.ibcp.fr). Sequence analysis was performed as previously described (8).

TABLE 1.

Patient information and autologous sequence analysis for patients with chronic and resolved HCV infection
CodeGenotypeStatusEpitope(s) targetedSequencea
02-031bChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
A: no sequence
00-261bChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
A: no sequence
99-242aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
No recognitionA: S-S--L---
A2 NS3 1406-1415P: KLVALGINAV
No recognitionA: A-RGM-L---
A2 NS5B 2594-2602P: ALYDVVTKL
A: no sequence
1111aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
A2 NS5 2594-2602P: ALYDVVTKL
A: ---------
00X3aChronicA2 NS5 2594-2602P: ALYDVVTKL
No recognitionA: -----IQ--
O3Qb1aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
03Sb1aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
02A1aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
A: no sequence
01N1aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
03H1aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
Full recognitionA: ----A----
01-391aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
03-45b1aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
06P3aChronicA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
DiminishedA: --------F
GS127-11aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
GS127-61aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
GS127-81bChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
GS127-161aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
GS127-201aChronicA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
A: ---------
04D4ResolvedA2 NS5 1987-1996P: VLSDFKTWKL
01-49b1ResolvedA2 NS5 1987-1996P: VLSDFKTWKL
A2 NS3 1406-1415P: KLVALGINAV
01-311ResolvedA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
B57 NS5 2629-2637P: KSKKTPMGF
04N1ResolvedA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
01E4ResolvedA2 NS5 1987-1996P: VLSDFKTWKL
98A1ResolvedA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
00-10c1ResolvedA24 NS4 1745-1754P: VIAPAVQTNW
O2Z1ResolvedA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
99-211ResolvedB7 CORE 41-49P: GPRLGVRAT
OOR1ResolvedB35 NS3 1359-1367P: HPNIEEVAL
Open in a separate windowaP, prototype; A, autologous. Identical residues are shown by dashes.bHIV coinfection.cHBV coinfection.

TABLE 2.

Patient information and autologous sequence analysis for patients with acute HCV infection
CodeGenotypeOutcomeEpitope targeted and time analyzedSequencea
5541aPersistingA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
wk 8A: ---------
wk 30A: ---------
03-321aPersistingB35 NS3 1359-1367P: HPNIEEVAL
wk 8A: ---------
No recognition (wk 36)A: S--------
04-111a (1st)Persisting (1st) Resolving (2nd)A2 NS5 2594-2602P: ALYDVVTKL
1b (2nd)A: no sequence
00231bPersistingA1 NS3 1436-1444P: ATDALMTGY
Diminished (wk 7)A: --------F
Diminished (wk 38)A: --------F
A2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
wk 7A: ---------
wk 38A: ---------
A2 NS3 1406-1415P: KLVALGINAV
Full recognition (wk 7)A: --S-------
Full recognition (wk 38)A: --S-------
3201ResolvingA2 NS3 1273-1282P: GIDPNIRTGV
5991ResolvingA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
11441ResolvingA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
B35 NS3 1359-1367P: HPNIEEVAL
06L3aResolvingB7 CORE 41-49P: GPRLGVRAT
05Y1ResolvingA2 NS3 1073-1083P: CINGVCWTV
Open in a separate windowaP, prototype; A, autologous. Identical residues are shown by dashes.In established persistent infection, CD8+ T-cell responses against HCV are infrequently detected in blood using major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I tetramers and are only observed in a small fraction of those sampled (10). We were able to examine the expression of CD127 on antigen-specific T cells in such a group of 18 individuals. We observed mostly high levels of CD127 expression (median, 66%) on these populations (Fig. (Fig.1a),1a), although expression was higher on HCV-specific T-cell populations from individuals with resolved infection (median, 97%; P = 0.0003) (Fig. 1a and c). Importantly, chronically infected individuals displayed CD127 expression levels over a much broader range than resolved individuals (9.5% to 100% versus 92 to 100%) (Fig. (Fig.1a1a).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Chronically infected individuals express a range of CD127 levels on HCV-specific T cells. (a) CD127 expression levels on HCV-specific T-cell populations in individuals with established chronic or resolved infection. While individuals with resolved infection (11 tetramer stains in 9 subjects) uniformly express high levels of CD127, chronically infected individuals (21 tetramer stains in 18 subjects) express a wide range of CD127 expression levels. (b) CD127 expression levels are seen to be highly dependent on sequence match with the autologous virus, based on analysis of 9 responses with diminished recognition of the autologous virus and 8 responses with intact epitopes. (c) CD127 expression levels on HCV-specific T-cell B7 CORE 41-49-specific T cells from individual 01-49 with resolved HCV infection (left-hand panel). Lower CD127 expression levels are observed on an EBV-specific T-cell population from the same individual (right-hand panel). APC-A, allophycocyanin-conjugated antibody. (d) Low CD127 levels are observed on A2 NS3 1073-1083 HCV-specific T cells from individual 111 with chronic HCV infection in whom sequencing revealed an intact autologous sequence.Given the relationship between CD127 expression and antigenic stimulation as well as the potential of HCV to escape the CD8 T-cell response through viral mutation, we sequenced the autologous circulating virus in subjects with chronic infection (Table (Table1).1). A perfect match between the optimal epitope sequence and the autologous virus was found for only 8 responses. These were the only T-cell populations with lower levels of CD127 expression (Fig. (Fig.1a,1a, b, and d). In contrast, HCV T-cell responses with CD127 expression levels comparable to those observed in resolved infection (>85%) were typically mismatched with the viral sequence, with some variants compatible with viral escape and others suggesting infection with a non-genotype 1 strain (10) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays using T-cell lines confirmed the complete abrogation of T-cell recognition and thus antigenic stimulation in cases of cross-genotype mismatch (10). Responses targeting the epitope A1-143D expressed somewhat lower levels of CD127 (between 70% and 85%). Viral escape (Y to F at position 9) in this epitope has been shown to be associated with significantly diminished but not fully abolished recognition (11a), and was found in all chronically infected subjects whose T cells targeted this epitope. Thus, expression of CD127 in the presence of viremia is closely associated with the capacity of the T cell to recognize the circulating virus.That a decrease in antigenic stimulation is indeed associated with the emergence of CD127-expressing CD8 T cells is further demonstrated in subject 111. This subject with chronic infection targeted fully conserved epitopes with T cells with low CD127 expression; with clearance of viremia under antiviral therapy, CD127-negative HCV-specific CD8 T cells were no longer detectable and were replaced by populations expressing CD127 (data not shown). Overall these data support the notion that CD127 expression on HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell populations is dependent on an absence of ongoing antigenic stimulation.To further evaluate the dynamic relationship between antigenic stimulation and CD127 expression, we also analyzed HCV-specific T-cell responses longitudinally during acute HCV infection (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). CD127 expression was generally low or absent during the earliest time points. After resolution of infection, we see a contraction of the HCV-specific T-cell response together with a continuous increase in CD127 expression, until virtually all tetramer-positive cells express CD127 approximately 6 months after the onset of disease (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). A similar increase in CD127 expression was not seen in one subject (no. 554) with untreated persisting infection that maintained a significant tetramer-positive T-cell population for an extended period of time (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). Importantly, sequence analysis of the autologous virus demonstrated the conservation of this epitope throughout persistent infection (8). In contrast, subject 03-32 (with untreated persisting infection) developed a CD8 T-cell response targeting a B35-restricted epitope in NS3 from which the virus escaped (8). The T cells specific for this epitope acquired CD127 expression in a comparable manner to those controlling infection (Fig. (Fig.2a).2a). In other subjects with persisting infection, HCV-specific T-cells usually disappeared from blood before the time frame in which CD127 upregulation was observed in the other subjects.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.CD127 expression levels during acute HCV infection. (a) CD127 expression levels on HCV-specific T cells during the acute phase of HCV infection (data shown for 5 individuals who resolve and two individuals who remain chronically infected). (b) HCV RNA viral load and CD127 expression levels on HCV-specific T cells (A2 NS3 1073-1083 and A1 NS3 1436-1444) for chronically infected individual 00-23. PEG-IFN-α, pegylated alpha interferon. (c) Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) plots showing longitudinal CD127 expression levels on HCV-specific T cells (A2 NS3 1073-1083 and A1 NS3 1436-1444) from individual 00-23.We also characterized the levels of CD127 expression on HCV-specific CD4+ T-cell populations with similar results: low levels were observed during the acute phase of infection and increased levels in individuals after infection was cleared (data not shown). CD127 expression on CD4 T cells could not be assessed in viral persistence since we failed to detect significant numbers of HCV-specific CD4+ T cells, in agreement with other reports.In our cohort of subjects with acute HCV infection, we had the opportunity to study the effect of reencounter with antigen on T cells with high CD127 expression in 3 subjects in whom HCV viremia returned after a period of viral control. Subject 00-23 experienced viral relapse after interferon treatment (11), while subjects 05-13 and 04-11 were reinfected with distinct viral isolates. In all subjects, reappearance of HCV antigen that corresponded to the HCV-specific T-cell population was associated with massive expansion of HCV-specific T-cell populations and a decrease in CD127 expression on these T cells (Fig. (Fig.22 and and3)3) (data not shown). In contrast, T-cell responses that did not recognize the current viral isolate did not respond with an expansion of the population or the downregulation of CD127. This was observed in 00-23, where the sequence of the A1-restricted epitope 143D was identical to the frequent escape mutation described above in chronically infected subjects associated with diminished T-cell recognition (Fig. (Fig.2b2b and and3a).3a). In 05-13, the viral isolate during the second episode of viremia contained a variant in one of the anchor residues of the epitope A2-61 (Fig. (Fig.2d).2d). These results show that CD127 expression on HCV-specific T cells follows the established principles observed in other viral infections.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Longitudinal phenotypic changes on HCV-specific T cells. (a) HCV RNA viral load and CD127 expression (%) levels on A2 NS5B 2594-2602 HCV-specific T cells for individual 04-11. This individual was administered antiviral therapy, which resulted in a sustained virological response. Following reinfection, the individual spontaneously cleared the virus. (b) Longitudinal frequency of A2 NS5B 2594-2602 HCV-specific T cells and PD-1 expression levels (mean fluorescent intensity [MFI]) for individual 04-11. (c) Longitudinal analysis of 04-11 reveals the progressive differentiation of HCV-specific A2 259F CD8+ T cells following repetitive antigenic stimulation. FACS plots show longitudinal CD127, CD27, CD57, and CCR7 expression levels on A2 NS5B 2594-2602 tetramer-positive cells from individual 04-11. PE-A, phycoerthrin-conjugated antibody.In addition to the changes in CD127 expression for T cells during reencounter with antigen, we detected comparable changes in other phenotypic markers shortly after exposure to viremia. First, we detected an increase in PD-1 and CD38 expression—both associated with recent T-cell activation. Additionally, we observed a loss of CD27 expression, a feature of repetitive antigenic stimulation (Fig. (Fig.3).3). The correlation of CD127 and CD27 expression further supports the notion that CD127 downregulation is a marker of continuous antigenic stimulation (1, 7).In conclusion we confirm that high CD127 expression levels are common for detectable HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell populations in chronic infection and find that this phenotype is based on the existence of viral sequence variants rather than on unique properties of HCV-specific T cells. This is further demonstrated by our data from acute HCV infection showing that viral escape as well as viral resolution is driving the upregulation of CD127. We also show that some, but not all, markers typically used to phenotypically describe virus-specific T cells show a similar dependence on cognate HCV antigen. Our data further highlight that sequencing of autologous virus is vital when interpreting data obtained in chronic HCV infection and raise the possibility that previous studies, focused on individuals with established chronic infection, may have been confounded by antigenic variation within epitopes or superinfection with different non-cross-reactive genotypes. Interestingly, it should be pointed out that this finding is supported by previous data from both the chimpanzee model of HCV and from human HBV infection (3, 13).Overall our data clearly demonstrate that the phenotype of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells is determined by the level of antigen-specific stimulation. The high number of CD127 positive virus-specific CD8+ T cells that is associated with the presence of viral escape mutations is a hallmark of chronic HCV infection that clearly separates HCV from other chronic viral infections (4, 14).  相似文献   

15.
The effects of the challenge dose and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class IB alleles were analyzed in 112 Mauritian cynomolgus monkeys vaccinated (n = 67) or not vaccinated (n = 45) with Tat and challenged with simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6Pcy243. In the controls, the challenge dose (10 to 20 50% monkey infectious doses [MID50]) or MHC did not affect susceptibility to infection, peak viral load, or acute CD4 T-cell loss, whereas in the chronic phase of infection, the H1 haplotype correlated with a high viral load (P = 0.0280) and CD4 loss (P = 0.0343). Vaccination reduced the rate of infection acquisition at 10 MID50 (P < 0.0001), and contained acute CD4 loss at 15 MID50 (P = 0.0099). Haplotypes H2 and H6 were correlated with increased susceptibility (P = 0.0199) and resistance (P = 0.0087) to infection, respectively. Vaccination also contained CD4 depletion (P = 0.0391) during chronic infection, independently of the challenge dose or haplotype.Advances in typing of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of Mauritian cynomolgus macaques (14, 20, 26) have provided the opportunity to address the influence of host factors on vaccine studies (13). Retrospective analysis of 22 macaques vaccinated with Tat or a Tat-expressing adenoviral vector revealed that monkeys with the H6 or H3 MHC class IB haplotype were overrepresented among aviremic or controller animals, whereas macaques with the H2 or H5 haplotype clustered in the noncontrollers (12). More recently, the H6 haplotype was reported to correlate with control of chronic infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) mac251, regardless of vaccination (18).Here, we performed a retrospective analysis of 112 Mauritian cynomolgus macaques, which included the 22 animals studied previously (12), to evaluate the impact of the challenge dose and class IB haplotype on the acquisition and severity of simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6Pcy243 infection in 45 control monkeys and 67 monkeys vaccinated with Tat from different protocols (Table (Table11).

TABLE 1.

Summary of treatment, challenge dose, and outcome of infection in cynomolgus monkeys
Protocol codeNo. of monkeysImmunogen (dose)aAdjuvantbSchedule of immunization (wk)RoutecChallenged (MID50)Virological outcomee
Reference(s) or source
ACV
ISS-ST6Tat (10)Alum or RIBI0, 2, 6, 12, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.m.104114, 17
ISS-ST1Tat (6)None0, 5, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, 42, 48i.d.101004, 17
ISS-PCV3pCV-tat (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben0, 2, 6, 11, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36i.m.103006
ISS-ID3Tat (6)none0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 39, 43, 60i.d.10111B. Ensoli, unpublished data
ISS-TR6Tat (10)Alum-Iscom0, 2, 6, 11, 16, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.d., i.m.10420Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TGf3Tat (10)Alum0, 4, 12, 22s.c.1503Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG3Tatcys22 (10)Alum1503Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG4Tatcys22 (10) + Gag (60)Alum1504Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG4Tat (10) + Gag (60)Alum1504Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-MP3Tat (10)H1D-Alum0, 4, 12, 18, 21, 38s.c., i.m.15021Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-MP3Tat (10)Alums.c.15003Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-GS6Tat (10)H1D-Alum0, 4, 12, 18, 21, 36s.c., i.m.15132Ensoli, unpublished
NCI-Ad-tat/Tat7Ad-tat (5 × 108 PFU), Tat (10)Alum0, 12, 24, 36i.n., i.t., s.c.15232Ensoli, unpublished
NCI-Tat9Tat (6 and 10)Alum/Iscom0, 2, 6, 11, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.d., i.m.1524312
ISS-NPT3pCV-tat (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscom0, 2, 8, 13, 17, 22, 28, 46, 71i.m.20003Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-NPT3pCV-tatcys22 (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscom0, 2, 8, 13, 17, 22, 28, 46, 71i.m.20111
    Total vaccinated67191731
        Naive11NoneNoneNAgNA10 or 15137
        Control34None, Ad, or pCV-0Alum, RIBI, H1D, Iscom or bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscoms.c., i.d., i.n., i.t., i.m.10, 15, or 2051316
    Total controls4561623
    Total112253354
Open in a separate windowaAll animals were inoculated with the indicated dose of Tat plasmid DNA (pCV-tat [8], adenovirus-tat [Ad-tat] [27]) or protein, Gag protein, or empty vectors (pCV-0, adenovirus [Ad]) by the indicated route. Doses are in micrograms unless indicated otherwise.bAlum, aluminum phosphate (4); RIBI oil-in-water emulsions containing squalene, bacterial monophosphoryl lipid A, and refined mycobacterial products (4); Iscom, immune-stimulating complex (4); H1D are biocompatible anionic polymeric microparticles used for vaccine delivery (10, 12, 25a).cs.c., subcutaneous; i.m., intramuscular; i.d., intradermal; i.n., intranasal; i.t., intratracheal.dAll animals were inoculated intravenously with the indicated dose of the same SHIV89.6.Pcy243 stock.eAccording to the virological outcome upon challenge, monkeys were grouped as aviremic (A), controllers (C), or viremic (V).fBecause of the short follow-up, controller status could not be determined and all infected monkeys of the ISS-TG protocol were therefore considered viremic.gNA, not applicable.  相似文献   

16.
Cj0859c variants fspA1 and fspA2 from 669 human, poultry, and bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains were associated with certain hosts and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) types. Among the human and poultry strains, fspA1 was significantly (P < 0.001) more common than fspA2. FspA2 amino acid sequences were the most diverse and were often truncated.Campylobacter jejuni is the leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide and responsible for more than 90% of Campylobacter infections (7). Case-control studies have identified consumption or handling of raw and undercooked poultry meat, drinking unpasteurized milk, and swimming in natural water sources as risk factors for acquiring domestic campylobacteriosis in Finland (7, 9). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has been employed to study the molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter (4) and can contribute to virulotyping when combined with known virulence factors (5). FspA proteins are small, acidic, flagellum-secreted nonflagellar proteins of C. jejuni that are encoded by Cj0859c, which is expressed by a σ28 promoter (8). Both FspA1 and FspA2 were shown to be immunogenic in mice and protected against disease after challenge with a homologous strain (1). However, FspA1 also protected against illness after challenge with a heterologous strain, whereas FspA2 failed to do the same at a significant level. Neither FspA1 nor FspA2 protected against colonization (1). On the other hand, FspA2 has been shown to induce apoptosis in INT407 cells, a feature not exhibited by FspA1 (8). Therefore, our aim was to study the distributions of fspA1 and fspA2 among MLST types of Finnish human, chicken, and bovine strains.In total, 367 human isolates, 183 chicken isolates, and 119 bovine isolates (n = 669) were included in the analyses (3). PCR primers for Cj0859c were used as described previously (8). Primer pgo6.13 (5′-TTGTTGCAGTTCCAGCATCGGT-3′) was designed to sequence fspA1. Fisher''s exact test or a chi-square test was used to assess the associations between sequence types (STs) and Cj0859c. The SignalP 3.0 server was used for prediction of signal peptides (2).The fspA1 and fspA2 variants were found in 62.6% and 37.4% of the strains, respectively. In 0.3% of the strains, neither isoform was found. Among the human and chicken strains, fspA1 was significantly more common, whereas fspA2 was significantly more frequent among the bovine isolates (Table (Table1).1). Among the MLST clonal complexes (CCs), fspA1 was associated with the ST-22, ST-45, ST-283, and ST-677 CCs and fspA2 was associated with the ST-21, ST-52, ST-61, ST-206, ST-692, and ST-1332 CCs and ST-58, ST-475, and ST-4001. Although strong CC associations of fspA1 and fspA2 were found, the ST-48 complex showed a heterogeneous distribution of fspA1 and fspA2. Most isolates carried fspA2, and ST-475 was associated with fspA2. On the contrary, ST-48 commonly carried fspA1 (Table (Table1).1). In our previous studies, ST-48 was found in human isolates only (6), while ST-475 was found in both human and bovine isolates (3, 6). The strict host associations and striking difference between fspA variants in human ST-48 isolates and human/bovine ST-475 isolates suggest that fspA could be important in host adaptation.

TABLE 1.

Percent distributions of fspA1 and fspA2 variants among 669 human, poultry, and bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains and their associations with hosts, STs, and CCs
Host or ST complex/ST (no. of isolates)% of strains witha:
P valueb
fspA1fspA2
Host
    All (669)64.335.4
    Human (367)69.530.0<0.001
    Poultry (183)79.220.8<0.001
    Bovine (119)25.274.8<0.0001
ST complex and STs
    ST-21 complex (151)2.697.4<0.0001
        ST-50 (76)NF100<0.0001
        ST-53 (19)NF100<0.0001
        ST-451 (9)NF100<0.0001
        ST-883 (11)NF100<0.0001
    ST-22 complex (22)100NF<0.0001
        ST-22 (11)100NF<0.01
        ST-1947 (9)100NF0.03
    ST-45 complex (268)99.30.7<0.0001
        ST-11 (7)100NFNA
        ST-45 (173)99.40.6<0.0001
        ST-137 (22)95.54.50.001
        ST-230 (14)100NF<0.0001
    ST-48 complex (18)44.455.6NA
        ST-48 (7)100NFNA
        ST-475 (8)NF100<0.001
    ST-52 complex (5)NF100<0.01
        ST-52 (4)NF1000.02
    ST-61 complex (21)NF100<0.0001
        ST-61 (11)NF100<0.0001
        ST-618 (3)NF1000.04
    ST-206 complex (5)NF100<0.01
    ST-283 complex (24)100NF<0.0001
        ST-267 (23)100NF<0.0001
    ST-677 complex (59)100NF<0.0001
        ST-677 (48)100NF<0.0001
        ST-794 (11)100NF<0.001
    ST-692 complex (3)NF1000.04
    ST-1034 complex (5)NF80NA
        ST-4001 (3)NF1000.04
    ST-1287 complex/ST-945 (8)100NFNA
    ST-1332 complex/ST-1332 (4)NF1000.02
    Unassigned STs
        ST-58 (6)NF100<0.01
        ST-586 (6)100NFNA
Open in a separate windowaIn 0.3% of the strains, neither isoform was found. NF, not found.bNA, not associated.A total of 28 isolates (representing 6 CCs and 13 STs) were sequenced for fspA1 and compared to reference strains NCTC 11168 and 81-176. All isolates in the ST-22 CC showed the same one-nucleotide (nt) difference with both NCTC 11168 and 81-176 strains, resulting in a Thr→Ala substitution in the predicted protein sequence (represented by isolate FB7437, GenBank accession number HQ104931; Fig. Fig.1).1). Eight other isolates in different CCs showed a 2-nt difference (isolate 1970, GenBank accession number HQ104932; Fig. Fig.1)1) compared to strains NCTC 11168 and 81-176, although this did not result in amino acid substitutions. All 28 isolates were predicted to encode a full-length FspA1 protein.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Comparison of FspA1 and FspA2 isoforms. FspA1 is represented by 81-176, FB7437, and 1970. FspA2 is represented by C. jejuni strains 76763 to 1960 (GenBank accession numbers HQ104933 to HQ104946). Scale bar represents amino acid divergence.In total, 62 isolates (representing 7 CCs and 35 STs) were subjected to fspA2 sequence analysis. Although a 100% sequence similarity between different STs was found for isolates in the ST-21, ST-45, ST-48, ST-61, and ST-206 CCs, fspA2 was generally more heterogeneous than fspA1 and we found 13 predicted FspA2 amino acid sequence variants in total (Fig. (Fig.1).1). In several isolates with uncommon and often unassigned (UA) STs, the proteins were truncated (Fig. (Fig.1),1), with most mutations being ST specific. For example, all ST-58 isolates showed a 13-bp deletion (isolate 3074_2; Fig. Fig.1),1), resulting in a premature stop codon. Also, all ST-1332 CC isolates were predicted to have a premature stop codon by the addition of a nucleotide between nt 112 and nt 113 (isolate 1960; Fig. Fig.1),1), a feature shared with two isolates typed as ST-4002 (UA). A T68A substitution in ST-1960 (isolate T-73494) also resulted in a premature stop codon. Interestingly, ST-1959 and ST-4003 (represented by isolate 4129) both lacked one triplet (nt 235 to 237), resulting in a shorter FspA2 protein. SignalP analysis showed the probability of a signal peptide between nt 22 and 23 (ACA-AA [between the underlined nucleotides]). An A24C substitution in two other strains, represented by isolate 76580, of ST-693 and ST-993 could possibly result in a truncated FspA2 protein as well.In conclusion, our results showed that FspA1 and FspA2 showed host and MLST associations. The immunogenic FspA1 seems to be conserved among C. jejuni strains, in contrast to the heterogeneous apoptosis-inducing FspA2, of which many isoforms were truncated. FspA proteins could serve as virulence factors for C. jejuni, although their roles herein are not clear at this time.  相似文献   

17.
A 30-probe assay was developed for simultaneous classification of Listeria monocytogenes isolates by lineage (I to IV), major serogroup (4b, 1/2b, 1/2a, and 1/2c), and epidemic clone (EC) type (ECI, ECIa, ECII, and ECIII). The assay was designed to facilitate rapid strain characterization and the integration of subtype data into risk-based inspection programs.Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that can cause serious invasive illness (listeriosis) in humans and other animals. L. monocytogenes is responsible for over 25% of food-borne-disease-related deaths attributable to known pathogens and is a leading cause of food recalls due to microbial adulteration (12, 21). However, not all L. monocytogenes subtypes contribute equally to human illness, and substantial differences in the ecologies and virulence attributes of different L. monocytogenes subtypes have been identified (9, 13, 14, 23, 24, 33, 35, 36). Among the four major evolutionary lineages of L. monocytogenes, only lineages I and II are commonly isolated from contaminated food and human listeriosis patients (19, 27, 29, 33). Lineage I strains are overrepresented among human listeriosis isolates, particularly those associated with epidemic outbreaks, whereas lineage II strains are overrepresented in foods and the environment (13, 14, 24). Lineage III strains account for approximately 1% of human listeriosis cases but are common among animal listeriosis isolates and appear to be a host-adapted group that is poorly adapted to food-processing environments (6, 34-36). The ecological and virulence attributes of lineage IV are poorly understood, as this lineage is rare and was only recently described based on a small number of strains (19, 26, 29, 33).L. monocytogenes is differentiated into 13 serotypes; however, four major serogroups (4b, 1/2b, 1/2a, and 1/2c) from within lineages I and II account for more than 98% of human and food isolates (16, 31). Serogroups refer to evolutionary complexes typified by a predominant serotype but which include very rare serotypes that represent minor evolutionary variants (7, 9, 33). Phylogenetic analyses have indicated that rare serotypes may have evolved recently, or even multiple times, from one of the major serotypes (9), and numerous molecular methods fail to discriminate minor serotypes as independent groups (1, 4, 7, 9, 18, 22, 33, 38, 39). Serotyping is one of the most common methods for L. monocytogenes subtyping, and serogroup classifications are a useful component of strain characterization because ecotype divisions appear largely congruent with serogroup distinctions (16, 34). Serogroup 4b strains are of particular public health concern because contamination with these strains appears to increase the probability that a ready-to-eat (RTE) food will be implicated in listeriosis (16, 28). Serogroup 4b strains account for approximately 40% of sporadic listeriosis and also are responsible for the majority of listeriosis outbreaks despite being relatively rare contaminants of food products (9, 13, 17, 30, 34). In addition, serogroup 4b strains are associated with more severe clinical presentations and higher mortality rates than other serogroups (11, 16, 20, 31, 34). Serogroups 1/2a and 1/2b are overrepresented among food isolates but also contribute significantly to human listeriosis, whereas serogroup 1/2c rarely causes human illness and may pose a lower risk of listeriosis for humans (16). Serogroup-specific differences in association with human listeriosis are consistent with the prevalence of virulence-attenuating mutations in inlA within these serogroups (32, 34); however, a number of additional factors likely contribute to these differences.Four previously described epidemic clones (ECs; ECI, ECIa, ECII, and ECIII) of L. monocytogenes have been implicated in numerous listeriosis outbreaks and have contributed significantly to sporadic illness (15, 34). ECI, ECIa, and ECII are distinct groups within serogroup 4b that were each responsible for repeated outbreaks of listeriosis in the United States and Europe. ECIII is a lineage II clone of serotype 1/2a that persisted in the same processing facility for more than a decade prior to causing a multistate outbreak linked to contaminated turkey (15, 25). While there has been speculation that epidemic clones possess unique adaptations that explain their frequent involvement in listeriosis outbreaks (9, 34, 37), it is not clear that epidemic clones are more virulent than other strains with the same serotype. However, contamination of RTE food with EC strains would be cause for increased concern due to the previous involvement of these clones in major outbreaks of listeriosis (16).As a result of the L. monocytogenes subtype-specific differences in ecology, virulence, and association with human illness, molecular subtyping technologies have the potential to inform assessments of relative risk and to improve risk-based inspection programs. The objective of the present study was to develop a single assay for rapid and accurate classification of L. monocytogenes isolates by lineage, major serogroup, and epidemic clone in order to facilitate strain characterization and the integration of subtype data into inspection programs that are based on assessment of relative risk.A database of more than 5.3 Mb of comparative DNA sequences from 238 L. monocytogenes isolates (9, 33-35) was scanned for single nucleotide polymorphisms that could be used to differentiate lineages, major serogroups, and epidemic clones via a targeted multilocus genotyping (TMLGT) approach. The acronym TMLGT is used to distinguish this approach from previously published multilocus genotyping (MLGT) assays that were lineage specific and designed for haplotype discrimination (9, 33). To provide for simultaneous interrogation of the selected polymorphisms via TMLGT, six genomic regions (Table (Table1)1) were coamplified in a multiplex PCR. While the previous MLGT assays were based on three lineage-specific multiplexes and required prior identification of lineage identity, TMLGT was designed to target variation across all of the lineages simultaneously and is based on a unique set of amplicons. PCR was performed in 50-μl volumes with 1× High Fidelity PCR buffer (Invitrogen Life Technologies), 2 mM MgSO4, 100 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 300 nM primer, 1.5 U Platinum Taq high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and 100 ng of genomic DNA. PCR consisted of an initial denaturation of 90 s at 96°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C, and 90 s at 68°C. Amplification products were purified using Montage PCR cleanup filter plates (Millipore) and served as a template for allele-specific primer extension (ASPE) reactions utilizing subtype-specific probes.

TABLE 1.

Primers used in multiplex amplification for the TMLGT assay
AmpliconPositionaGene(s)PrimerSequence (5′-3′)b
INLa455381-456505inlAinl2-a1GTCCTTGATAGTCTACTG
inl2-a2ACCAAATTAGTAATCTAGCAC
INLb457726-458752inlBinl-f1dGAATTRTTTAGYCAAGAATGT
inlb-rCTACCGGRACTTTATAGTAYG
LMO325116-326096lmo0298-lmo0300lmo-a1AAGGCTTACAAGATGGCT
lmo1a-1rAAATAATAYGTGATACCGAC
VGCa205366-206622plcA, hlyplca-fCTCATCGTATCRTGTGTACC
hly-rTCTGGAAGGTCKTGTAGGTTC
VGCb208447-209465mplra_mpl-fGTGGAYAGAACTCATAAAGG
ra_mpl-rACTCCCTCCTYGTGATASGCT
VGCc209728-211239actAvgc1a-2fTTCMATRCCAGCAGAACG
vgc1a-2rGCAGACCTAATAGCAATGTTG
Open in a separate windowaCorresponding nucleotide positions in the complete genome sequence of L. monocytogenes strain EGD-e (GenBank accession number NC_003210).bSee IUPAC codes for definition of degenerate bases.ASPE was performed in multiplex reactions including 30 probes, with each lineage (I to IV), major serogroup (4b, 1/2b, 1/2a, and 1/2c), and epidemic clone (ECI, ECIa, ECII, and ECIII) targeted by two different probes (Table (Table2).2). In addition, positive-control probes were included to confirm the presence of each amplicon in the multiplex PCR. As serogroups and epidemic clones are nested within a particular lineage, probes for these groups were designed to be specific within the appropriate lineage and values for these probes were evaluated only for isolates of the appropriate lineage. For example, serogroup 1/2a probes were evaluated only for isolates that were positive for lineage II probes. ASPE probes were designed with a unique 5′ sequence tag specific to individual sets of xMAP fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (Luminex Corporation) used to sort extension products. Extension and hybridization reactions were performed as described previously (9) except microspheres were twice pelleted by centrifugation (4 min at 2,250 × g) and resuspended in 75 μl 1× TM buffer prior to being pelleted and resuspended in 100 μl 1× TM buffer containing 2 μg/ml streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Samples were incubated for 15 min at 37°C prior to detecting the microsphere complexes with a Luminex 100 flow cytometer (Luminex Corporation). The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) from biotinylated extension products attached to 100 microspheres was measured for each probe. The average MFI from three template-free control samples was also determined and subtracted from the raw MFI of each sample to account for background fluorescence. Probe performance was initially evaluated via the index of discrimination (ID) as described by Ducey et al. (9), and probes with ID values less than 2.0 were redesigned.

TABLE 2.

TMLGT probes and probe performance data
ProbebTarget (n)cProbe sequencedIDeSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
VGCb-21Lineage I (506)AATCCTTTCTTTAATCTCAAATCAgcggaagcttgggaagcggtc7.3100100
VGCa-94Lineage ICTTTCTATCTTTCTACTCAATAATcaacccgatgttcttcctgtc51.7100100
VGCc-8Lineage II (340)AATCCTTTTACATTCATTACTTACattagctgattcgctttcct14.1100100
INLb-51Lineage IITCATTTCAATCAATCATCAACAATagcgccaataaagctggc21.9100100
VGCb-19Lineage III (50)TCAATCAATTACTTACTCAAATACccgctattaaaatgtactcca31.0100100
VGCb-29Lineage IIIAATCTTACTACAAATCCTTTCTTTggtataccgctattaaaatgt45.1100100
LMO-17Lineage IV (10)CTTTAATCCTTTATCACTTTATCAgaaccaaacaatgttattggt11.8100100
VGCa-27Lineage IVCTTTTCAAATCAATACTCAACTTTttaacgacggtaacgtgccac58.3100100
INLb-84Serogroup 4b (213)TCAACTAACTAATCATCTATCAATggtaaaaatatgcgaatattg9.7100100
INLb-85Serogroup 4bATACTACATCATAATCAAACATCActcgtgaacaagctttcc5.5100100
INLb-16Serogroup 1/2b (293)AATCAATCTTCATTCAAATCATCAggtaaaaatatgcgtatctta11.7100100
INLb-100Serogroup 1/2bCTATCTTTAAACTACAAATCTAACgtgaataagctatcggtctat13.0100100
LMO-42Serogroup 1/2a (268)CTATCTTCATATTTCACTATAAACtggcgttgctgrctaagtttg6.6100100
VGCb-40Serogroup 1/2aCTTTCTACATTATTCACAACATTAaatcaagcsgctcatatgaag10.410098.6
LMO-9Serogroup 1/2c (72)TAATCTTCTATATCAACATCTTACtttactggtgaaatggcg13.5100100
VGCb-5Serogroup 1/2cCAATTCAAATCACAATAATCAATCaagattacgaatcgcttccac20.898.6100
LMO-10ECI (111)ATCATACATACATACAAATCTACAatgattaaaagtcagggaaag19.0100100
LMO-28ECICTACAAACAAACAAACATTATCAAaatcgaggcttacgaacgt23.7100100
VGCc-80ECIa (44)CTAACTAACAATAATCTAACTAACactacaacgaaaacagcgc10.7100100
VGCa-35ECIaCAATTTCATCATTCATTCATTTCAgttacttttatgtcgagt9.2100100
LMO-12ECII (35)TACACTTTCTTTCTTTCTTTCTTTataccgattatttggacggtt3.8100100
LMO-30ECIITTACCTTTATACCTTTCTTTTTACgacttgtagcagttgatttcaa7.5100100
VGCc-45ECIII (10)TCATTTCACAATTCAATTACTCAActcttatttgcttttgttggtc21.110099.4
INLa-3ECIIITACACTTTATCAAATCTTACAATCgagcttaatgaaaatcagcta17.010099.4
INLa-1INLa controlCTTTAATCTCAATCAATACAAATCagaagtggaagctgggaaNAaNANA
INLb-13INLb controlCAATAAACTATACTTCTTCACTAAtgcacctaaacctccgacNANANA
LMO-88LMO controlTTACTTCACTTTCTATTTACAATCccgtttccttatgccacaNANANA
VGCa-23VGCa controlTTCAATCATTCAAATCTCAACTTTcaagycctaagacgccaatcgNANANA
VGCb-25VGCb controlCTTTTCAATTACTTCAAATCTTCAgcatgcgttagttcatgrccaNANANA
VGCc-82VGCc controlTACATACACTAATAACATACTCATgactgcatgctagaatctaagNANANA
Open in a separate windowaNA, not applicable for positive amplicon control probes.bLuminex microsphere sets (Luminex Corporation) used for hybridization reactions are indicated following the hyphen.cn, number of isolates representing the target subtype among the 906 tested isolates.dThe 5′ sequence tag portions of extension probes are capitalized. See IUPAC codes for definitions of degenerate bases.eID, index of discrimination.Validation of the TMLGT assay was performed using 906 L. monocytogenes isolates for which the lineage, major serogroup, and epidemic clone type had been determined independently (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). A subset of 92 isolates, including at least five isolates from each lineage, serogroup, and epidemic clone type, was used to evaluate the discriminatory power of subtype-specific probes and the repeatability of the assay (see Table S1). Two independent runs of the 30-probe TMLGT assay produced identical results for these 92 isolates. In addition, genotypes matched expectations for all isolate/probe combinations, and the fluorescence intensities for positive genotypes (those targeted by a particular probe) were 3.8 to 58.3 (mean, 18.5) times as high as background values for isolates with negative genotypes (those not targeted by a particular probe) (Table (Table2).2). The performances of individual probes also were assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity, where sensitivity is defined as the percentage of positive samples that produced positive results and specificity indicates the percentage of negative samples that produce negative results (5). Based on results from all 906 isolates analyzed by TMLGT, probe sensitivity was at least 98.6% and 23 of the 24 subtype-specific probes exhibited 100% sensitivity (Table (Table2).2). The specificities for all probes were also greater than 98.6%, and 21 of the 24 subtype-specific probes exhibited 100% specificity (Table (Table22).All but three of the 906 isolates in the validation panel were fully and accurately typed relative to lineage, serogroup, and epidemic clone by using the TMLGT assay (typeability, 99.9%; accuracy of isolate assignment, 99.8%). One of the lineage II isolates, NRRL B-33880, could not be assigned to a serogroup based on the TMLGT results because this isolate was positive for one of the serogroup 1/2a probes (VGCb-40) and one of the serogroup 1/2c probes (LMO-9). This isolate was previously identified as a member of serogroup 1/2c based on mapping lineage-specific MLGT data onto a multilocus phylogeny (34) but produced a serogroup 1/2a-specific banding pattern (data not shown) with the multiplex PCR assay described by Doumith et al. (7). Similar strains, including the common laboratory strain EGD-e, were found to have genomes that are more similar to serogroup 1/2c strains than to strains from the 1/2a serogroup (8, 33) and likely represent intermediates in the evolution of the 1/2c clade from 1/2a ancestors. There is a poor correlation between genomic and antigenic variation for such isolates (34), consistent with the ambiguous results produced by application of the TMLGT assay to NRRL B-33880. The two other problematic isolates, NRRL B-33555 and NRRL B-33559, were accurately identified based on TMLGT data as lineage II isolates from the 1/2a serogroup. However, these two isolates were positive for both ECIII-specific probes in the TMLGT assay but have lineage-specific MLGT haplotypes (Lm2.46), indicating that they are representatives of a sister group closely related to ECIII (33).In 2005, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) implemented an approach to inspection that includes consideration of relative risk in order to determine L. monocytogenes sampling frequency among establishments that produce certain RTE products. This approach incorporates information on production volume, outgrowth potential in the product, steps taken to prevent postlethality contamination, and FSIS sampling history. However, L. monocytogenes subtype-specific variation in ecology and virulence indicates that information on the lineage, major serogroup, and epidemic clone identities of isolates could be used to inform assessments of relative risk and to improve inspection programs that are based on consideration of risk. Several PCR-based methods have been described for differentiation of various combinations of these subgroups (1-3, 5, 7, 10, 35, 37); however, these approaches have focused on a single subgroup or a smaller set of subgroups than is differentiated by TMLGT analysis. Although we previously developed a set of three MLGT assays that can be used to differentiate all of the major serogroups and epidemic clones of L. monocytogenes (9, 33, 34), those assays did not include probes for lineage discrimination and require identification of the lineage prior to application of one of three unique sets of probes. In addition, the MLGT assays were designed to maximize strain discrimination, as opposed to subgroup identification, and require the use of at least twice as many probes as is needed for TMLGT analysis. MLGT data analysis is also more complicated than analysis of TMLGT data, and serogroup or epidemic clone type identification via MLGT requires phylogenetic analyses to place novel haplotypes within an established phylogenetic framework.In the present study, we developed the first assay for simultaneous discrimination of the four lineages, the four major serogroups, and the four previously described epidemic clones of L. monocytogenes. The assay includes multiple markers for each of these subtype probes as well as control probes to ensure that negative probe data were not the result of amplification failure, providing a high degree of internal validation required for use in inspection programs that consider risk in making sampling decisions. In addition, the utility of the assay has been validated with a large and diverse panel of 906 isolates, including 567 isolates from FSIS surveillance of RTE products and processing facilities (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Data produced by the TMLGT assay are amenable to high-throughput analysis, and a simple spreadsheet utility has been developed to semiautomate subtype identifications and to alert investigators to potentially conflicting probe data (available upon request). In addition to having a potential application in inspection programs, the TMLGT assay provides a rapid and accurate means of characterizing L. monocytogenes isolates from different environments, which would facilitate pathogen tracking and improve understanding of L. monocytogenes ecology.   相似文献   

18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号