Characterization of sequence contexts that favor alternative end joining at Cas9-induced double-strand breaks

Alternative end joining (alt-EJ) mechanisms, such as polymerase theta-mediated end joining, are increasingly recognized as important contributors to inaccurate double-strand break repair. We previously proposed an alt-EJ model whereby short DNA repeats near a double-strand break anneal to form secondary structures that prime limited DNA synthesis. The nascent DNA then pairs with microhomologous sequences on the other break end. This synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining (SD-MMEJ) explains many of the alt-EJ repair products recovered following I-SceI nuclease cutting in Drosophila. However, sequence-specific factors that influence SD-MMEJ repair remain to be fully characterized. Here, we expand the utility of the SD-MMEJ model through computational analysis of repair products at Cas9-induced double-strand breaks for 1100 different sequence contexts. We find evidence at single nucleotide resolution for sequence characteristics that drive successful SD-MMEJ repair. These include optimal primer repeat length, distance of repeats from the break, flexibility of DNA sequence between primer repeats, and positioning of microhomology templates relative to preferred primer repeats. In addition, we show that DNA polymerase theta is necessary for most SD-MMEJ repair at Cas9 breaks. The analysis described here includes a computational pipeline that can be utilized to characterize preferred mechanisms of alt-EJ repair in any sequence context.     

Dual Roles for DNA Polymerase Theta in Alternative End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by multiple mechanisms that are roughly grouped into the categories of homology-directed repair and non-homologous end joining. End-joining repair can be further classified as either classical non-homologous end joining, which requires DNA ligase 4, or “alternative” end joining, which does not. Alternative end joining has been associated with genomic deletions and translocations, but its molecular mechanism(s) are largely uncharacterized. Here, we report that Drosophila melanogaster DNA polymerase theta (pol theta), encoded by the mus308 gene and previously implicated in DNA interstrand crosslink repair, plays a crucial role in DNA ligase 4-independent alternative end joining. In the absence of pol theta, end joining is impaired and residual repair often creates large deletions flanking the break site. Analysis of break repair junctions from flies with mus308 separation-of-function alleles suggests that pol theta promotes the use of long microhomologies during alternative end joining and increases the likelihood of complex insertion events. Our results establish pol theta as a key protein in alternative end joining in Drosophila and suggest a potential mechanistic link between alternative end joining and interstrand crosslink repair.     

Biochemical evidence for Ku-independent backup pathways of NHEJ

Cells of higher eukaryotes process within minutes double strand breaks (DSBs) in their genome using a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) apparatus that engages DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4 and other as of yet unidentified factors. Although chemical inhibition, or mutation, in any of these factors delays processing, cells ultimately remove the majority of DNA DSBs using an alternative pathway operating with an order of magnitude slower kinetics. This alternative pathway is active in mutants deficient in genes of the RAD52 epistasis group and frequently joins incorrect ends. We proposed, therefore, that it reflects an alternative form of NHEJ that operates as a backup (B-NHEJ) to the DNA-PK-dependent (D-NHEJ) pathway, rather than homology directed repair of DSBs. The present study investigates the role of Ku in the coordination of these pathways using as a model end joining of restriction endonuclease linearized plasmid DNA in whole cell extracts. Efficient, error-free, end joining observed in such in vitro reactions is strongly inhibited by anti-Ku antibodies. The inhibition requires DNA-PKcs, despite the fact that Ku efficiently binds DNA ends in the presence of antibodies, or in the absence of DNA-PKcs. Strong inhibition of DNA end joining is also mediated by wortmannin, an inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in the presence but not in the absence of Ku, and this inhibition can be rescued by pre-incubating the reaction with double stranded oligonucleotides. The results are compatible with a role of Ku in directing end joining to a DNA-PK dependent pathway, mediated by efficient end binding and productive interactions with DNA-PKcs. On the other hand, efficient end joining is observed in extracts of cells lacking DNA-PKcs, as well as in Ku-depleted extracts in line with the operation of alternative pathways. Extracts depleted of Ku and DNA-PKcs rejoin blunt ends, as well as homologous ends with 3′ or 5′ protruding single strands with similar efficiency, but addition of Ku suppresses joining of blunt ends and homologous ends with 3′ overhangs. We propose that the affinity of Ku for DNA ends, particularly when cooperating with DNA-PKcs, suppresses B-NHEJ by quickly and efficiently binding DNA ends and directing them to D-NHEJ for rapid joining. A chromatin-based model of DNA DSB rejoining accommodating biochemical and genetic results is presented and deviations between in vitro and in vivo results discussed.     

T-DNA integration in Arabidopsis chromosomes. Presence and origin of filler DNA sequences

To investigate the relationship between T-DNA integration and double-stranded break (DSB) repair in Arabidopsis, we studied 67 T-DNA/plant DNA junctions and 13 T-DNA/T-DNA junctions derived from transgenic plants. Three different types of T-DNA-associated joining could be distinguished. A minority of T-DNA/plant DNA junctions were joined by a simple ligation-like mechanism, resulting in a junction without microhomology or filler DNA insertions. For about one-half of all analyzed junctions, joining of the two ends occurred without insertion of filler sequences. For these junctions, microhomology was strikingly combined with deletions of the T-DNA ends. For the remaining plant DNA/T-DNA junctions, up to 51-bp-long filler sequences were present between plant DNA and T-DNA contiguous sequences. These filler segments are built from several short sequence motifs, identical to sequence blocks that occur in the T-DNA ends and/or the plant DNA close to the integration site. Mutual microhomologies among the sequence motifs that constitute a filler segment were frequently observed. When T-DNA integration and DSB repair were compared, the most conspicuous difference was the frequency and the structural organization of the filler insertions. In Arabidopsis, no filler insertions were found at DSB repair junctions. In maize (Zea mays) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), DSB repair-associated filler was normally composed of simple, uninterrupted sequence blocks. Thus, although DSB repair and T-DNA integration are probably closely related, both mechanisms have some exclusive and specific characteristics.     

The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex functions in resection-based DNA end joining in Xenopus laevis

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential to maintain genomic integrity. In higher eukaryotes, DNA DSBs are predominantly repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but DNA ends can also be joined by an alternative error-prone mechanism termed microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). In MMEJ, the repair of DNA breaks is mediated by annealing at regions of microhomology and is always associated with deletions at the break site. In budding yeast, the Mre11/Rad5/Xrs2 complex has been demonstrated to play a role in both classical NHEJ and MMEJ, but the involvement of the analogous MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 (MRN) complex in end joining in higher eukaryotes is less certain. Here we demonstrate that in Xenopus laevis egg extracts, the MRN complex is not required for classical DNA-PK-dependent NHEJ. However, the XMRN complex is necessary for resection-based end joining of mismatched DNA ends. This XMRN-dependent end joining process is independent of the core NHEJ components Ku70 and DNA-PK, occurs with delayed kinetics relative to classical NHEJ and brings about repair at sites of microhomology. These data indicate a role for the X. laevis MRN complex in MMEJ.     

Microhomology-mediated deletion and gene conversion in African trypanosomes

Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes is induced by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In these protozoan parasites, DSB repair (DSBR) is dominated by homologous recombination (HR) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), while non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) has not been reported. To facilitate the analysis of chromosomal end-joining, we established a system whereby inter-allelic repair by HR is lethal due to loss of an essential gene. Analysis of intrachromosomal end joining in individual DSBR survivors exclusively revealed MMEJ-based deletions but no NHEJ. A survey of microhomologies typically revealed sequences of between 5 and 20 bp in length with several mismatches tolerated in longer stretches. Mean deletions were of 54 bp on the side closest to the break and 284 bp in total. Break proximity, microhomology length and GC-content all favored repair and the pattern of MMEJ described above was similar at several different loci across the genome. We also identified interchromosomal gene conversion involving HR and MMEJ at different ends of a duplicated sequence. While MMEJ-based deletions were RAD51-independent, one-sided MMEJ was RAD51 dependent. Thus, we describe the features of MMEJ in Trypanosoma brucei, which is analogous to micro single-strand annealing; and RAD51 dependent, one-sided MMEJ. We discuss the contribution of MMEJ pathways to genome evolution, subtelomere recombination and antigenic variation.     

Effect of Ku86 and DNA-PKcs deficiency on non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination using a transient transfection assay

In mammalian cells, DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination, both pathways being essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. We determined the effect of mutations in Ku86 and DNA-PK on the efficiency and the accuracy of double-strand break repair by non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in mammalian cells. We used an assay, based on the transient transfection of a linearized plasmid DNA, designed to simultaneously detect transfection and recombination markers. In agreement with previous results non-homologous end-joining was largely compromised in Ku86 deficient cells, and returned to normal in the Ku86-complemented isogenic cell line. In addition, analysis of DNA plasmids recovered from Ku86 mutant cells showed an increased use of microhomologies at the nonhomologous end joining junctions, and displayed a significantly higher frequency of DNA insertions compared to control cells. On the other hand, the DNA-PKcs deficient cell lines showed efficient double-strand break repair by both mechanisms.     

DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining

Non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) is considered the major pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells and depends, among other things, on the DNA end-binding Ku70/80 heterodimer. To investigate the function of Ku in NHEJ we have compared the ability of cell-free extracts from wild-type CHO-K1 cells, Ku80-deficient xrs6 cells and Ku80-cDNA-complemented xrs6 cells (xrs6-Ku80) to rejoin different types of DSB in vitro. While the two Ku80-proficient extracts were highly efficient and accurate in rejoining all types of DNA ends, the xrs6 extract displayed strongly decreased NHEJ efficiency and accuracy. The lack of accuracy is most evident in non-homologous terminus configurations containing 3′-overhangs that abut a 5′-overhang or blunt end. While the sequences of the 3′-overhangs are mostly preserved by fill-in DNA synthesis in the Ku80-proficient extracts, they are always completely lost in the xrs6 extract so that, instead, small deletions displaying microhomology patches at their breakpoints arise. In summary, our results are consistent with previous results from Ku-deficient yeast strains and indicate that Ku may serve as an alignment factor that not only increases NHEJ efficiency but also accuracy. Furthermore, a secondary NHEJ activity is present in the absence of Ku which is error-prone and possibly assisted by base pairing interactions.     

Requirement for the SRS2 DNA helicase gene in non-homologous end joining in yeast

Mitotic cells experience double-strand breaks (DSBs) from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Since unrepaired DSBs can result in genome rearrangements or cell death, cells mobilize multiple pathways to repair the DNA damage. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitotic cells preferentially use a homologous recombination repair pathway. However, when no significant homology to the DSB ends is available, cells utilize a repair process called non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which can join ends with no homology through resection to uncover microhomologies of a few nucleotides. Although components of the homologous recombination repair system are also involved in NHEJ, the rejoining does not involve all of the homologous recombination repair genes. The SRS2 DNA helicase has been shown to be required for DSB repair when the homologous single-stranded regions are short. Here it is shown that SRS2 is also required for NHEJ, regardless of the cell mating type. Efficient NHEJ of sticky ends requires the Ku70 and Ku80 proteins and the silencing genes SIR2, SIR3 and SIR4. However, NHEJ of blunt ends, while very inefficient, is not further reduced by mutations in YKU70, SIR2, SIR3, SIR4 or SRS2, suggesting that this rejoining process occurs by a different mechanism.     

Single-stranded DNA oligomers stimulate error-prone alternative repair of DNA double-strand breaks through hijacking Ku protein

In humans, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by two mutually-exclusive mechanisms, homologous recombination or end-joining. Among end-joining mechanisms, the main process is classical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) which relies on Ku binding to DNA ends and DNA Ligase IV (Lig4)-mediated ligation. Mostly under Ku- or Lig4-defective conditions, an alternative end-joining process (A-EJ) can operate and exhibits a trend toward microhomology usage at the break junction. Homologous recombination relies on an initial MRN-dependent nucleolytic degradation of one strand at DNA ends. This process, named DNA resection generates 3′ single-stranded tails necessary for homologous pairing with the sister chromatid. While it is believed from the current literature that the balance between joining and recombination processes at DSBs ends is mainly dependent on the initiation of resection, it has also been shown that MRN activity can generate short single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssO) that may also be implicated in repair regulation. Here, we evaluate the effect of ssO on end-joining at DSB sites both in vitro and in cells. We report that under both conditions, ssO inhibit C-NHEJ through binding to Ku and favor repair by the Lig4-independent microhomology-mediated A-EJ process.     

XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate incompatible DNA ends and can ligate across gaps

XRCC4 and DNA ligase IV form a complex that is essential for the repair of all double-strand DNA breaks by the nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway in eukaryotes. We find here that human XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate two double-strand DNA ends that have fully incompatible short 3' overhang configurations with no potential for base pairing. Moreover, at DNA ends that share 1-4 annealed base pairs, XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate across gaps of 1 nt. Ku can stimulate the joining, but is not essential when there is some terminal annealing. Polymerase mu can add nucleotides in a template-independent manner under physiological conditions; and the subset of ends that thereby gain some terminal microhomology can then be ligated. Hence, annealing at sites of microhomology is very important, but the flexibility of the ligase complex is paramount in nonhomologous DNA end joining. These observations provide an explanation for several in vivo observations that were difficult to understand previously.     

Double-strand break repair in Ku86- and XRCC4-deficient cells.

The Ku86 and XRCC4 proteins perform critical but poorly understood functions in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Both Ku 86- and XRCC4-deficient cells exhibit profound radiosensitivity and severe defects in V(D)J recombination, including excessive deletions at recombinant junctions. Previous workers have suggested that these phenomena may reflect defects in joining of the broken DNA ends or in protection of the ends from nucleases. However, end joining in XRCC4-deficient cells has not been examined. Here we show that joining of both matched and mismatched DNA ends occurs efficiently in XRCC4-deficient cells. Furthermore, analysis of junctions shows that XRCC4 is not required to protect the ends from degradation. However, nucleotide sequence analysis of junctions derived from joining of mismatched DNA ends in XRCC4-deficient cells revealed a strong preference for a junction containing a 7 nt homology. Similar results were obtained in Ku86-deficient cells. These data suggest that in the absence of XRCC4 or Ku86, joining is assisted by base pairing interactions, supporting the hypothesis that these proteins may participate in aligning or stabilizing intermediates in end joining.     

Multiple end joining mechanisms repair a chromosomal DNA break in fission yeast

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is an important mechanism for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a conserved set of NHEJ factors including Ku, DNA ligase IV, Xlf1, and Pol4. Their roles in chromosomal DSB repair have not been directly characterized before. Here we used HO endonuclease to create a specific chromosomal DSB in fission yeast and examined the imprecise end joining events allowing cells to survive the continuous expression of HO. Our analysis showed that cell survival was significantly reduced in mutants defective for Ku, ligase IV, or Xlf1. Using Sanger sequencing and Illumina sequencing, we have characterized in depth the repair junction sequences in HO survivors. In wild type cells the majority of repair events were one-nucleotide insertions dependent on Ku, ligase IV, and Pol4. Our data suggest that fission yeast Pol4 is important for gap filling during NHEJ repair and can extend primers in the absence of terminal base pairing with the templates. In Ku and ligase IV mutants, the survivors mainly resulted from two types of alternative end joining events: one used microhomology flanking the HO site to delete sequences of hundreds to thousands of base pairs, the other rejoined the break using the HO-generated overhangs but also introduced one- or two-nucleotide base substitutions. The chromosomal repair assay we describe here should provide a useful tool for further exploration of the end joining repair mechanisms in fission yeast.     

DNA double strand break repair in human bladder cancer is error prone and involves microhomology-associated end-joining

In human cells DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. In a background of NHEJ deficiency, DSBs with mismatched ends can be joined by an error-prone mechanism involving joining between regions of nucleotide microhomology. The majority of joins formed from a DSB with partially incompatible 3′ overhangs by cell-free extracts from human glioblastoma (MO59K) and urothelial (NHU) cell lines were accurate and produced by the overlap/fill-in of mismatched termini by NHEJ. However, repair of DSBs by extracts using tissue from four high-grade bladder carcinomas resulted in no accurate join formation. Junctions were formed by the non-random deletion of terminal nucleotides and showed a preference for annealing at a microhomology of 8 nt buried within the DNA substrate; this process was not dependent on functional Ku70, DNA-PK or XRCC4. Junctions were repaired in the same manner in MO59K extracts in which accurate NHEJ was inactivated by inhibition of Ku70 or DNA-PK_cs. These data indicate that bladder tumour extracts are unable to perform accurate NHEJ such that error-prone joining predominates. Therefore, in high-grade tumours mismatched DSBs are repaired by a highly mutagenic, microhomology-mediated, alternative end-joining pathway, a process that may contribute to genomic instability observed in bladder cancer.     

Repair of a minimal DNA double-strand break by NHEJ requires DNA-PKcs and is controlled by the ATM/ATR checkpoint

Mammalian cells primarily rejoin DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. The joining of the broken DNA ends appears directly without template and accuracy is ensured by the NHEJ factors that are under ATM/ATR regulated checkpoint control. In the current study we report the engineering of a mono-specific DNA damaging agent. This was used to study the molecular requirements for the repair of the least complex DSB in vivo. Single-chain PvuII restriction enzymes fused to protein delivery sequences transduce cells efficiently and induce blunt end DSBs in vivo. We demonstrate that beside XRCC4/LigaseIV and KU, the DNA-PK catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is also essential for the joining of this low complex DSB in vivo. The appearance of blunt end 3′-hydroxyl and 5′-phosphate DNA DSBs induces a significantly higher frequency of anaphase bridges in cells that do not contain functional DNA-PKcs, suggesting an absolute requirement for DNA-PKcs in the control of chromosomal stability during end joining. Moreover, these minimal blunt end DSBs are sufficient to induce a p53 and ATM/ATR checkpoint function.     

Different DNA End Configurations Dictate Which NHEJ Components Are Most Important for Joining Efficiency

The nonhomologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ) pathway is a key mechanism for repairing dsDNA breaks that occur often in eukaryotic cells. In the simplest model, these breaks are first recognized by Ku, which then interacts with other NHEJ proteins to improve their affinity at DNA ends. These include DNA-PK_cs and Artemis for trimming the DNA ends; DNA polymerase μ and λ to add nucleotides; and the DNA ligase IV complex to ligate the ends with the additional factors, XRCC4 (X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 4), XLF (XRCC4-like factor/Cernunos), and PAXX (paralog of XRCC4 and XLF). In vivo studies have demonstrated the degrees of importance of these NHEJ proteins in the mechanism of repair of dsDNA breaks, but interpretations can be confounded by other cellular processes. In vitro studies with NHEJ proteins have been performed to evaluate the nucleolytic resection, polymerization, and ligation steps, but a complete system has been elusive. Here we have developed a NHEJ reconstitution system that includes the nuclease, polymerase, and ligase components to evaluate relative NHEJ efficiency and analyze ligated junctional sequences for various types of DNA ends, including blunt, 5′ overhangs, and 3′ overhangs. We find that different dsDNA end structures have differential dependence on these enzymatic components. The dependence of some end joining on only Ku and XRCC4·DNA ligase IV allows us to formulate a physical model that incorporates nuclease and polymerase components as needed.     

Regulation of repair choice: Cdk1 suppresses recruitment of end joining factors at DNA breaks

Cell cycle plays a crucial role in regulating the pathway used to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, homologous recombination is primarily limited to non-G₁ cells as the formation of recombinogenic single-stranded DNA requires CDK1-dependent 5′ to 3′ resection of DNA ends. However, the effect of cell cycle on non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is not yet clearly defined. Using an assay to quantitatively measure the contributions of each repair pathway to repair product formation and cellular survival after DSB induction, we found that NHEJ is most efficient at G₁, and markedly repressed at G₂. Repression of NHEJ at G₂ is achieved by efficient end resection and by the reduced association of core NHEJ proteins with DNA breaks, both of which depend on the CDK1 activity. Importantly, repression of 5′ end resection by CDK1 inhibition at G₂ alone did not fully restore either physical association of Ku/Dnl4-Lif1 with DSBs or NHEJ proficiency to the level at G₁. Expression of excess Ku can partially offset the inhibition of end joining at G₂. The results suggest that regulation of Ku/Dnl4-Lif1 affinity for DNA ends may contribute to the cell cycle-dependent modulation of NHEJ efficiency.     

Gap Filling Activities of Pseudomonas DNA Ligase D (LigD) Polymerase and Functional Interactions of LigD with the DNA End-binding Ku Protein

Many bacterial pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, have a nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) system of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair driven by Ku and DNA ligase D (LigD). LigD is a multifunctional enzyme composed of a ligase domain fused to an autonomous polymerase module (POL) that adds ribonucleotides or deoxyribonucleotides to DSB ends and primer-templates. LigD POL and the eukaryal NHEJ polymerase λ are thought to bridge broken DNA ends via contacts with a duplex DNA segment downstream of the primer terminus, a scenario analogous to gap repair. Here, we characterized the gap repair activity of Pseudomonas LigD POL, which is more efficient than simple templated primer extension and relies on a 5′-phosphate group on the distal gap strand end to confer apparent processivity in filling gaps of 3 or 4 nucleotides. Mutations of the His-553, Arg-556, and Lys-566 side chains implicated in DNA 5′-phosphate binding eliminate the preferential filling of 5′-phosphate gaps. Mutating Phe-603, which is imputed to stack on the nucleobase of the template strand that includes the 1st bp of the downstream gap duplex segment, selectively affects incorporation of the final gap-closing nucleotide. We find that Pseudomonas Ku stimulates POL-catalyzed ribonucleotide addition to a plasmid DSB end and promotes plasmid end joining by full-length Pseudomonas LigD. A series of incremental truncations from the C terminus of the 293-amino acid Ku polypeptide identifies Ku-(1–229) as sufficient for homodimerization and LigD stimulation. The slightly longer Ku-(1–253) homodimer forms stable complexes at both ends of linear plasmid DNA that protect the DSBs from digestion by 5′- and 3′-exonucleases.     

Distinct mechanisms of nonhomologous end joining in the repair of site-directed chromosomal breaks with noncomplementary and complementary ends

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most important type of DNA damage inflicted by ionizing radiation. The molecular mechanisms of DSB repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) have not been well studied in live mammalian cells, due in part to the lack of suitable chromosomal repair assays. We previously introduced a novel plasmid-based assay to monitor NHEJ of site-directed chromosomal I-SceI breaks. In the current study, we expanded the analysis of chromosomal NHEJ products in murine fibroblasts to focus on the error-prone rejoining of DSBs with noncomplementary ends, which may serve as a model for radiation damage repair. We found that noncomplementary ends were efficiently repaired using microhomologies of 1-2 nucleotides (nt) present in the single-stranded overhangs, thereby keeping repair-associated end degradation to a minimum (2-3 nt). Microhomology-mediated end joining was disrupted by Wortmannin, a known inhibitor of DNA-PKcs. However, Wortmannin did not significantly impair the proficiency of end joining. In contrast to noncomplementary ends, the rejoining of cohesive ends showed only a minor dependence on microhomologies but produced fivefold larger deletions than the repair of noncomplementary ends. Together, these data suggest the presence of several distinct NHEJ mechanisms in live cells, which are characterized by the degree of sequence deletion and microhomology use. Our NHEJ assay should prove a useful system to further elucidate the genetic determinants and molecular mechanisms of site-directed DSBs in living cells.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a serious threat for the cell and when not repaired or misrepaired can result in mutations or chromosome rearrangements and eventually in cell death. Therefore, cells have evolved a number of pathways to deal with DSB including homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In mammals DSBs are primarily repaired by NHEJ and HR, while HR repair dominates in yeast, but this depends also on the phase of the cell cycle. NHEJ functions in all kinds of cells, from bacteria to man, and depends on the structure of DSB termini. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. The usage of microhomology is common in DNA end-joining of physiological DSBs, such as at the coding ends in V(D)J (variable(diversity) joining) recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK(cs)), which is recruited by DNA Ku protein, a heterodimer of Ku70 and Ku80, as well as XRCC4 protein and DNA ligase IV. A complex of Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2, a family of Sir proteins and probably other yet unidentified proteins can be also involved in this process. NHEJ and HR may play overlapping roles in the repair of DSBs produced in the S phase of the cell cycle or at replication forks. Aside from DNA repair, NHEJ may play a role in many different processes, including the maintenance of telomeres and integration of HIV-1 genome into a host genome, as well as the insertion of pseudogenes and repetitive sequences into the genome of mammalian cells. Inhibition of NHEJ can be exploited in cancer therapy in radio-sensitizing cancer cells. Identification of all key players and fundamental mechanisms underlying NHEJ still requires further research.