Relationship Between the Environmental Endocrine Disruptor Bisphenol a and Dyslipidemia: A Five-Year Prospective Study

Objective: To investigate whether serum bisphenol A (BPA) concentration is related to the occurrence of dyslipidemia.Methods: A total of 574 adults were enrolled at baseline and followed up for 5 years. Concentrations of serum BPA, triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured. Dyslipidemia was defined as the existence of one or more of the following conditions: high-LDL-cholesterolemia (LDL ≥140 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia (TGs ≥150 mg/dL), or low-HDL-cholesterolemia (HDL <40 mg/dL). Participants were stratified into tertiles according to low, median, and high baseline serum BPA levels. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used. Data from baseline and follow-up were used for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively.Results: In the cross-sectional analysis, compared to subjects in the low BPA tertile, those in the high BPA tertile showed a higher level of LDL cholesterol (108.1 ± 24.4 mg/dL versus 119.5 ± 26.9 mg/dL; P<.05) and a lower level of HDL cholesterol (46.2 ± 11.7 mg/dL versus 39.5 ± 7.5 mg/dL; P<.05). In multivariable linear regression models, Z-transformed BPA was positively associated with LDL cholesterol (β= 0.13, P = .002) and negatively associated with HDL cholesterol (β= -0.28; P<.001). After cross-sectionally adjusting for confounders, subjects in higher BPA exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, in subjects without low-HDL-cholesterolemia at baseline, each SD increment in baseline BPA was associated with a higher incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio [95% confidence interval; CI] 2.76, 95% CI 1.21, 6.29).Conclusion: Cross-sectionally, higher BPA exposure is associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, baseline BPA is an independent predictor of the 5-year incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; BPA = bisphenol A; CI = confidence interval; CVD = cardiovascular disease; EIMDS = environment, inflammation and metabolic diseases study; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein; OR = odds ratio; PPAR = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SBP = systolic blood pressure; TG = triglyceride; Z-BPA = Z-transformed bisphenol A     

Inpatient Hypoglycemic Events in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Glycemic Control in a High-Risk Population

Objective: Inpatient hypoglycemia (glucose ≤70 mg/dL) is a limitation of intensive control with insulin. Causes of hypoglycemia were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial examining intensive glycemic control (IG, target 140 mg/dL) versus moderate glycemic control (MG, target 180 mg/dL) on post–liver transplant outcomes.Methods: Hypoglycemic episodes were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team to calculate and identify contributing pathophysiologic and operational factors. A subsequent subgroup case control (1:1) analysis (with/without) hypoglycemia was completed to further delineate factors. A total of 164 participants were enrolled, and 155 patients were examined in depth.Results: Overall, insulin-related hypoglycemia was experienced in 24 of 82 patients in IG (episodes: 20 drip, 36 subcutaneous [SQ]) and 4 of 82 in MG (episodes: 2 drip, 2 SQ). Most episodes occurred at night (41 of 60), with high insulin amounts (44 of 60), and during a protocol deviation (51 of 60). Compared to those without hypoglycemia (n = 127 vs. n = 28), hypoglycemic patients had significantly longer hospital stays (13.6 ± 12.6 days vs. 7.4 ± 6.1 days; P = .002), higher peak insulin drip rates (17.4 ± 10.3 U/h vs. 13.1 ± 9.9 U/h; P = .044), and higher peak insulin glargine doses (36.8 ± 21.4 U vs. 26.2 ± 24.3 U; P = .035). In the case-matched analysis (24 cases, 24 controls), those with insulin-related hypoglycemia had higher median peak insulin drip rates (17 U/h vs. 11 U/h; P = .04) and protocol deviations (92% vs. 50%; P = .004).Conclusion: Peak insulin requirements and protocol deviations were correlated with hypoglycemia.Abbreviations:DM = diabetes mellitusICU = intensive care unitIG = intensive glycemic controlMELD = Model for End-stage Liver DiseaseMG = moderate glycemic controlSQ = subcutaneous     

Glycemic Control and Outcomes of Hospitalization in Noncritically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Admitted With Cardiac Problems or Infections

ObjectiveAlthough the importance of glycemic control is well established for patients with diabetes hospitalized for surgical problems, it has not been supported by clinical studies for patients with diabetes hospitalized on the medical floors.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 378 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for cardiac or infectious disease (ID) diagnosis between September 1, 2011, and August 1, 2012. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital stay shorter than 3 days, and daily glucocorticoid dose > 20 mg of methylprednisolone. The primary composite outcome included death during hospitalization, ICU transfer, initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition, line infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, rise in plasma creatinine by 1 or > 2 mg/dL, new infection, an infection lasting for more than 20 days, and readmission within 30 days and between 1 and 10 months after discharge.ResultsPatients were stratified by mean blood glucose (BG) level: group 1 had mean BG of < 180 mg/dL (n = 286; mean BG, 142 ± 23 mg/dL), whereas group 2 had mean BG levels > 181 mg/dL (n = 92; mean BG, 218 ± 34 mg/dL; P < .0001). Group 2 had a 46% higher occurrence of the primary outcome (P < .0004). The rate of unfavorable events was greater in cardiac and ID patients with worse glycemic control (group 2).ConclusionOur data strongly support a positive influence of better glycemic control (average glycemia < 180 mg/dL or 10 mmol/L) on outcomes of hospitaliza-tion in patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014; 20:1303-1308)     

Hospital Insulin Protocol Aims For Glucose Control In Glucocorticoid-Induced Hyperglycemia

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 2 insulin protocols to treat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia in the nonintensive care hospital setting.Methods: A randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study was conducted comparing standard recommended care of complete insulin orders (CIO) (i.e., 3-part insulin regimen of long-acting basal [background], rapid-acting bolus [mealtime], and rapid-acting correction factor) to an experimental group following a regimen of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) plus CIO (NPH-CIO). The primary outcome was mean blood glucose (BG), and the secondary outcome was percent of BG in target range of 70 to 180 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia was also evaluated.Results: Sixty-one patients completed 2 to 5 consecutive inpatient days (31 CIO; 30 NPH-CIO). Baseline mean BG results were 237.2 ± 50.2 and 221.9 ± 35.8 mg/dL (P = .30) in the CIO and NPH-CIO groups, respectively. No significant difference in overall mean BG between the 2 groups was detected; however, a significant difference arose on day 3: mean BG 181.8 ± 32.6 mg/dL (CIO) versus 157.2 ± 6.1 mg/dL (NPH-CIO) (P = .03). Moreover, the total daily doses (TDDs) of insulin did not differ: 34.8 ± 43.0 units (CIO) versus 35.8 ± 25.0 units (NPH-CIO) (P = .13). Percent of BG in target was 54.6% (CIO) and 62% (NPH-CIO) (P = .24). Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dL) was the same in both groups (0.1%).Conclusion: NPH added to 3-part insulin regimen (CIO) may be an effective way to a combat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia, though further research is needed in a larger population.Abbreviations:A1C = hemoglobin A1CBG = blood glucoseCIO = complete insulin ordersDM = diabetes mellitusNPH = neutral protamine HagedornNPH-CIO = neutral protamine Hagedorn plus CIOTDD = total daily dose     

Association of Glycemic Control Parameters with Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Critical Illness

ObjectiveChronic critical illness (CCI) is a term used to designate patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy with associated poor outcomes. The present study assessed the impact of glycemic parameters on outcomes in a CCI population.MethodsA retrospective case series was performed including 148 patients in The Mount Sinai Hospital Respiratory Care Unit (2009-2010). Utilizing a semi-parametric mixture model, trajectories for the daily mean blood glucose (BG), BG range, and hypoglycemia rate over time identified low- (n = 87) and high-risk (n = 61) hyperglycemia groups and low- (n = 90) and high-risk (n = 58) hypoglycemia groups. The cohort was also classified into diabetes (DM, n = 48), stress hyperglycemia (SH, n = 85), and normal glucose (n = 15) groups.ResultsHospital- (28% vs. 13%, P = .0199) and 1-year mortality (66% vs. 46%, P = .0185) rates were significantly greater in the high- versus low-risk hyperglycemia groups, respectively. The hypoglycemia rate (< 70 mg/dL) was lower among ventilator-liberated patients compared to those who failed to liberate (0.092 vs. 0.130, P < .0001). In the SH group, both hospital mortality (high-risk hyperglycemia 48% and low-risk hyperglycemia 15%, P = .0013) and 1-year mortality (high-risk 74% and low-risk 50%, P = .0482) remained significantly different, while no significant difference in the diabetes group was observed. There were lower hypoglycemia rates with SH compared to diabetes (< 70 mg/dL: 0.086 vs. 0.182, P < .0001; < 40 mg/dL: 0.012 vs. 0.022, P = .0118, respectively).ConclusionTighter glycemic control was associated with improved outcomes in CCI patients with SH but not in CCI patients with diabetes. Confirmation of these findings may lead to stratified glycemic control protocols in CCI patients based on the presence or absence of diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:884-893)     

High-Dose Glucocorticoid Treatment Does Not Induce Severe Hyperglycemia in Young Patients with Autoimmune Diseases by Cgms

Objective: High-dose glucocorticoids (HDG) are used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Glucocorticoids-induced hyperglycemia (GIH) is often described in elderly patients. In young patients with autoimmune diseases, however, the risk for GIH has not been well characterized.Methods: We recruited 24 inpatients (median age, 32 years; interquartile range, 25–42) with exacerbations of autoimmune diseases, receiving 1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent methylprednisone. Fourteen subjects were naïve to glucocorticoids (group 1) and 10 subjects were on glucocorticoid maintenance (≤15 mg/day prednisone at least 3 months) (group 2) prior to HDG. All subjects were monitored by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) for 3 days.Results: GIH developed in 21 (91%) subjects, 11/13 in group 1 and 10/10 in group 2. The main peak of glucose excursion (128.7 ± 6.4 mg/dL, group 1; 143.9 ± 10.0 mg/dL, group 2) occurred at 2 to 3 pm. Another peak occurred before sleep. Two-hour mean postprandial glucose levels were normal in both groups: breakfast, 105.0 ± 28.4 versus 125.6 ± 24.4 mg/dL, P = .065; lunch, 115.7 ± 21.1 versus 135.9 ± 29.0 mg/dL, P = .082; dinner, 122.8 ± 18.5 versus 137.8 ± 26.4 mg/dL, P = .144 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was a positive association between pretreatment hemoglobin A1C and peak glucose levels (P<.0001). Notably, 35% of our subjects experienced early morning hypoglycemia (65.2 ± 2.8 mg/dL).Conclusion: In hospitalized young patients with auto-immune diseases, CGMS data revealed that short-term consistent HDG treatment induced mild hyperglycemia, peaking in the early afternoon and before sleep. Early morning hypoglycemia was found in 35%.Abbreviations: A1C = hemoglobin A1C; AUC = the area under the curve; BG = blood glucose; BMI = body mass index; CGMS = continuous glucose monitoring system; DM = diabetes mellitus; FBG = fasting blood glucose; GA = glycated albumin; GCs = glucocorticoids; GIH = glucocorticoids-induced hyperglycemia; HDG = high-dose glucocorticoids; HOMA-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance; IG = interstitial glucose; IQR = interquartile range; PUMCH = Peking Union Medical College Hospital; SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus     

Basal-Bolus Regimen With Insulin Analogues Versus Human Insulin in Medical Patients with type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Latin America

Objective: Few randomized studies have focused on the optimal management of non–intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes in Latin America. We compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus regimen with analogues and human insulins in general medicine patients admitted to a University Hospital in Asunción, Paraguay.Methods: In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized 134 nonsurgical patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 66) or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) twice daily and regular insulin before meals (n = 68). Major outcomes included differences in daily BG levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events between treatment groups.Results: There were no differences in the mean daily BG (157 ± 37 mg/dL versus 158 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .90) or in the number of BG readings within target <140 mg/dL before meals (76% versus 74%) between the glargine/glulisine and NPH/regular regimens. The mean insulin dose in the glargine/glulisine group was 0.76 ± 0.3 units/kg/day (glargine, 22 ± 9 units/day; glulisine, 31 ± 12 units/day) and was not different compared with NPH/regular group (0.75 ± 0.3 units/kg/day [NPH, 28 ± 12 units/day; regular, 23 ± 9 units/day]). The overall prevalence of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was similar between patients treated with NPH/regular and glargine/glulisine (38% versus 35%; P = .68), but more patients treated with human insulin had severe (<40 mg/dL) hypoglycemia (7.6% versus 25%; P = .08). There were no differences in length of hospital stay or mortality between groups.Conclusion: The basal-bolus regimen with insulin analogues resulted in equivalent glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia compared to treatment with human insulin in hospitalized patients with diabetes.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin NPH = Neutral Protamine Hagedorn T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Glucose Variability is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients Treated with Total Parenteral Nutrition

ObjectiveHyperglycemia is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients treated with total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The role of glucose variability (GV) in predicting outcomes in these patients is not known.MethodsThis retrospective study included medical and surgical patients receiving TPN in a community teaching hospital. GV was calculated by standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose (BG) values and by mean BG daily (Δ) change (daily max – daily minimum).ResultsA total of 276 medical and surgical patients (mean age: 51 ± 18 years), 19% with a history of diabetes mellitus (DM), and 74% with intensive care unit (ICU) admission were treated with TPN. During TPN, the mean daily BG was 142.9 ± 33 mg/dL; frequencies of hypoglycemia < 70 and < 40 mg/dL were 41% and 3%, respectively; and hospital mortality was 27.2%. The mean GV by SD was 38 ± 21 mg/dL and by mean (Δ) change 58 ± 34 mg/dL. GV was significantly higher in deceased patients (SD: 48 ± 25 vs. 34 ± 18 mg/dL and Δ change: 75 ± 39 vs. 51 ± 29 mg/dL, both P < .01) than surviving patients. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, DM status, gender, APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score, mean daily glucose, and hypoglycemia revealed that GV was an independent predictor of hospital mortality (P < .05). The association between GV and mortality was limited to patients without a history of DM and was not present in patients with DM.ConclusionHigh GV is associated with increased hospital mortality independent of the presence and severity of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia during TPN therapy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine if reduction in GV with intensive glycemic control improves clinical outcomes in patients treated with TPN. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:41-45)     

Serum Free Cortisol During Glucagon Stimulation Test In Healthy Short-Statured Children And Adolescents

Objective: The total cortisol (TC) response may be measured during the glucagon stimulation test (GST) for growth hormone (GH) reserve in order to assess the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Measurements of TC are unreliable in conditions of albumin and cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) alterations (e.g., hypoproteinemia or CBG deficiency). We aimed to measure the serum free cortisol (sFC) response to the GST in children and adolescents and determine whether it could predict the GH response to glucagon stimulation.Methods: Infants and children with either short stature or growth attenuation who were referred for evaluation of GH reserve underwent the GST.Results: The study population consisted of 103 subjects (62 females), median age 3.9 years (range, 0.5–14). The mean basal and peak TC levels were 13.3 ± 6.7 μg/dL and 29.6 ± 8.8 μg/dL, respectively. The mean basal and peak sFC levels were 0.7 ± 0.8 μg/dL and 1.7 ± 1.1 μg/dL, respectively. There was a negative correlation between peak TC and age (r = -0.3, P = .007) but not between peak sFC and age (r = -0.09, P = .36). Ninety-five percent of the patients had peak TC levels >15.8 μg/dL and peak sFC levels >0.6 μg/dL.Conclusion: Our results on a cohort of healthy short-statured children can serve as reference values for the sFC response during GST. Based on these results, we propose peak TC levels >15.8 μg/dL and peak sFC levels >0.6 μg/dL for defining normalcy of the HPA axis during the GST in children and adolescents.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotrophic hormoneBMI = body mass indexCBG = cortisol-binding globulinGH = growth hormoneGST = glucagon stimulation testHPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalSDS = standard deviation scoresFC = serum free cortisolTC = total cortisol     

Influence Of Diabetes And Hyperglycemia On Duration Of Stay In Patients Hospitalized With Congestive Heart Failure

ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of diabetes and hyperglycemia on duration of stay in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure (CHF).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of data for patients admitted during a 6-month period with CHF to a community teaching hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. Patients were divided into diabetic and nondiabetic groups, and patients with diabetes were stratified by mean fasting plasma glucose levels into the following groups: < 110 mg/dL, 110 to 180 mg/dL, and > 180 mg/dL. The primary outcome was duration of hospitalization. Other variables included sex, age, ejection fraction, admission glucose, brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, and other comorbidities.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 142 patients, 49% of whom had diabetes. The duration of hospitalization was 3.23 days in the patients with diabetes versus 3.11 days in those without diabetes (P = .875). Patients with diabetes were significantly younger (71.8 versus 76.6 years; P = .027) and had a higher baseline mean creatinine level (1.4 versus 1.2 mg/dL; P = .010). Patients with diabetes in the 110 to 180 mg/dL blood glucose group had shorter hospitalizations than did those in the < 110 mg/dL group (2.94 versus 3.41 days; P = .259). Only 9 patients had blood glucose levels > 180 mg/dL, and these patients had the longest hospitalizations (mean duration, 3.78 days).ConclusionThe prevalence of diabetes was higher in our study than in previously published studies of patients with CHF. Although patients with diabetes did not have significantly longer hospitalizations than those without diabetes, they were significantly younger and had higher baseline creatinine values. Hyperglycemia was an infrequent phenomenon among patients without diabetes. The patients with diabetes in the 110 to 180 mg/dL blood glucose group had shorter hospitalizations than did those in the < 110 mg/dL group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Many of the initial studies of tight glucose control were conducted in the surgical intensive care unit, but recently published evidence has raised doubt about applying these results to medical patients. We conclude that there may be no significant benefit in terms of duration of hospitalization in assigning patients with diabetes who have CHF exacerbations to tight glucose control regimens. A more liberal approach of maintaining glucose levels at 110 to 180 mg/dL may be acceptable. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:691-696)     

Prevalence of Diabetes,Prediabetes, and Stress Hyperglycemia: Insulin Therapy and Metabolic Control in Patients on Total Parenteral Nutrition (Prospective Multicenter Study)

ObjectiveThe prevalence of carbohydrate metabolism disorders in patients who receive total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is not well known. These disorders can affect the treatment, metabolic control, and prognosis of affected patients. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence in noncritically ill patients on TPN of diabetes, prediabetes, and stress hyperglycemia; the factors affecting hyperglycemia during TPN; and the insulin therapy provided and the metabolic control achieved.MethodsWe undertook a prospective multicenter study involving 19 Spanish hospitals. Noncritically ill patients who were prescribed TPN were included, and data were collected on demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables (glycated hemoglobin, C-reactive protein [CRP], capillary blood glucose) as well as insulin treatment.ResultsThe study included 605 patients. Before initiation of TPN, the prevalence of known diabetes was 17.4%, unknown diabetes 4.3%, stress hyperglycemia 7.1%, and prediabetes 27.8%. During TPN therapy, 50.9% of patients had at least one capillary blood glucose of > 180 mg/dL. Predisposing factors were age, levels of CRP and glycated hemoglobin, the presence of diabetes, infectious complications, the number of grams of carbohydrates infused, and the administration of glucose-elevating drugs. Most (71.6%) patients were treated with insulin. The mean capillary blood glucose levels during TPN were: known diabetes (178.6 ± 46.5 mg/dL), unknown diabetes (173.9 ± 51.9), prediabetes (136.0 ± 25.4), stress hyperglycemia (146.0 ± 29.3), and normal (123.2 ± 19.9) (P < .001).ConclusionThe prevalence of carbohydrate metabolism disorders is very high in noncritically ill patients on TPN. These disorders affect insulin treatment and the degree of metabolic control achieved. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:59-67)     

Daily Inpatient Glycemic Survey (DINGS): A Process to Remotely Identify and Assist in the Management of Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes and Hyperglycemia

Objective: Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability have been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and overall costs of care in hospitalized patients. At the Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, New York, a process aimed to improve inpatient glycemic control by remotely assisting primary care teams in the management of hyperglycemia and diabetes was designed.Methods: An electronic query comprised of hospitalized patients with glucose values <70 mg/dL or >350 mg/dL is generated daily. Electronic medical records (EMRs) are individually reviewed by diabetes specialist providers, and management recommendations are sent to primary care teams when applicable. Glucose data was retrospectively examined before and after the establishment of the daily inpatient glycemic survey (DINGS) process, and rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia were compared.Results: Patient-day mean glucose slightly but significantly decreased from 177.6 ± 64.4 to 173.2 ± 59.4 mg/dL (P<.001). The percentage of patient-days with any value >350 mg/dL also decreased from 9.69 to 7.36% (P<.001), while the percentage of patient-days with mean glucose values in the range of 90 to 180 mg/dL increased from 58.1 to 61.4% (P<.001). Glycemic variability, assessed by the SD of glucose, significantly decreased from 53.9 to 49.8 mg/dL (P<.001). Moreover, rates of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) decreased significantly by 41% (P<.001).Conclusion: Quality metrics of inpatient glycemic control improved significantly after the establishment of the DINGS process within our facility. Prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm a causal association.Abbreviations: DINGS = daily inpatient glycemic survey EMR = electronic medical record HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin ICU = intensive care unit VA = Veterans Affairs     

Markedly Delayed Insulin Secretion and a High Rate of Undetected Overt Diabetes Characterize Glucose Metabolism in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis After Lung Transplantation

Objective: Cystic fibrosis–related diabetes (CFRD) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and should be screened for by an annual oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Since pathophysiologic studies have mainly been performed in a pediatric/adolescent, nontransplanted collective, we aimed to assess parameters of insulin secretion and sensitivity in adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients after lung transplantation (LT).Methods: Twelve adult CF patients after LT without known diabetes (33.3 ± 11.5 years; body mass index &lsqb;BMI] 21.5 ± 3.3 kg/m²) and 8 control subjects matched by age (36.0 ± 6.6 years; P>.05), BMI (22.3 ± 1.5 kg/m²; P>.05), and gender (CON group) underwent a 3-hour OGTT with glucose, insulin, and C-peptide measurements. Parameters of insulin secretion and sensitivity as well as lipid profiles were assessed.Results: In the CF group, 4 patients were diagnosed with overt diabetes (CFRD) compared to CF patients without diabetes (CF-noDM), of whom 6 had indeterminate glycemia with 1-h glucose values >200 mg/dL. The insulin peak after glucose load occurred after 30 minutes in CON, after 90 minutes in CF-noDM, and was missing in CFRD. Insulin sensitivity was comparable between the groups. Beta-cell glucose sensitivity was markedly reduced in CFRD (10.7 ± 5.8 pmol/min*m²*mM), higher in CF-noDM (39.9 ± 23.4 pmol/min*m²*mM), but still significantly lower compared to CON (108.3 ± 53.9 pmol/min*m²*mM; P = .0008). CFRD patients exhibited increased triglyceride levels and decreased high-density lipoprotein levels.Conclusion: Adult CF patients after LT have profound disturbances in glucose metabolism, with a high rate of undetected diabetes and markedly delayed insulin secretion. Curbed beta-cell glucose sensitivity rather than insulin resistance explains postprandial hyperglycemia and is accompanied by abnormalities in lipid metabolism.Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; BMI = body mass index; CF = cystic fibrosis; CFRD = cystic fibrosis–related diabetes; CFTR = cystic fibrosis transmembrane-conductance regulator; CF-TX = cystic fibrosis patients who underwent lung transplantation; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; INDET = indeterminate glycemia; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LT = lung transplantation; OGIS = oral glucose sensitivity index; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; QUICKI = quantitative insulin sensitivity check index     

Initial Combination Therapy with Metformin and Colesevelam for Achievement of Glycemic and Lipid Goals Min Early Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with metformin plus colesevelam in patients with early type 2 diabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [A1C] values of 6.5% to 10.0%) and hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] levels ≥ 100 mg/dL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo in combination with open-label metformin (850 mg/d; uptitrated at week 2 to 1, 700 mg/d). The primary efficacy evaluation was change in A1C from baseline to study end (week 16 with last observation carried forward).ResultsIn total, 286 patients were randomized: metformin/colesevelam (n = 145) or metformin/placebo (n = 141). Mean A1C was reduced by 1.1% with metformin/ colesevelam (from 7.8% at baseline to 6.6% at study end) and by 0.8% with metformin/placebo (from 7.5% to 6.7%), resulting in a treatment difference of -0.3% at study end (P = .0035). In addition, metformin/colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (-16.3%), total cholesterol (-6.1%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-8.3%), apolipoprotein B (-8.0%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-17%) and increased apolipoprotein A-I (+ 4.4%) and triglycerides (+ 18.6%) versus metformin/placebo (P < .01 for all). The proportions of patients who achieved recommended goals with metformin/colesevelam versus metformin/placebo, respectively, were as follows: A1C < 7.0% (67% versus 56% [P = .0092]), LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (48% versus 18% [P < .0001]), and composite A1C < 7.0% + LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (40% versus 12% [P < .0001]). Safety and tolerability were similar between the treatment groups.ConclusionMetformin plus colesevelam may be a valid option for initial therapy to achieve glycemic and lipid goals safely in early type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:629-640)     

Eating and Glycemic Control Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Intravenous Insulin

Objective: Consensus guidelines recommend that intensive care unit (ICU) patients with blood glucose (BG) levels >180 mg/dL receive continuous intravenous insulin (CII). The effectiveness of CII at controlling BG levels among patients who are eating relative to those who are eating nothing by mouth (nil per os; NPO) has not been described.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 260 adult patients (156 eating, 104 NPO) admitted to an ICU between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who received CII. Patients were excluded for a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, admission to an obstetrics service, or receiving continuous enteral or parenteral nutrition.Results: Among 22 baseline characteristics, the proportion of patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment (GCTx) (17.3% eating, 37.5% NPO; P<.001) and APACHE II score (15.0 ± 7.5 eating, 17.9 ± 7.9 NPO; P = .004) were significantly different between eating and NPO patients. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of patient-day weighted mean BG overall (153 ± 8 mg/dL eating, 156 ± 7 mg/dL NPO; P = .73), or day-by-day BG (P = .37) adjusted for GCTx and APACHE score. Surprisingly, there was a significant difference in the distribution of BG values, with eating patients having a higher percentage of BG readings in the recommended range of 140 to 180 mg/dL. However, eating patients showed greater glucose variability (coefficient of variation 23.1 ± 1.0 eating, 21.2 ± 1.0 NPO; P = .034).Conclusion: Eating may not adversely affect BG levels of ICU patients receiving CII. Whether or not prandial insulin improves glycemic control in this setting should be studied.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; CII = continuous insulin infusion; CV = coefficient of variation; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; ICU = intensive care unit; NPO = nil per os; PDWMBG = patient day weighted mean blood glucose     

Vitamin D-Binding Protein in Healthy Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: Relationship with Estradiol Concentrations

Objective: To examine the relationship between endogenous serum estradiol and vitamin D–binding protein (DBP) and total, free, and bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations in pre- and postmenopausal women.Methods: In 165 healthy women (ages, 26 to 75 years) not taking any form of exogenous estrogen, the serum concentrations of estradiol, 25OHD, DBP, parathyroid hormone, and albumin were measured. Free and bioavailable 25OHD (free + albumin-bound) levels were calculated from total 25OHD, DBP, and serum albumin levels.Results: Premenopausal women had higher serum 25OHD (31.5 ± 7.9 ng/mL), DBP (45.3 ± 6.2 mg/dL), and estradiol (52.8 ± 35.0 pg/mL) levels than postmenopausal women (26.5 ± 4.9 ng/mL, 41.7 ± 5.7 mg/dL, and 12.9 ± 4.9 pg/mL), respectively. In addition, the calculated free and bioavailable 25OHD levels were higher in prethan postmenopausal women (P<.05). Serum estradiol correlated with DBP (r = 0.22; P<.01) and total 25OHD (r = 0.27; P<.01). In multivariate regression models (with or without serum 25OHD), estradiol was independently associated with DBP (P<.05).Conclusion: Lower estradiol level is one of the factors that contribute to lower DBP levels in older women. Our data indicate that besides well-known factors such as age, gender, and race, serum estradiol concentrations are also a physiologic predictor of DBP concentration.Abbreviations: 25OHD = 25-hydroxyvitamin D BMI = body mass index CV = coefficient of variation DBP = vitamin D–binding protein PTH = parathyroid hormone SHBG = sex hormone–binding globulin     

Colesevelam Hydrochloride to Treat Hypercholesterolemia and Improve Glycemia in Prediabetes: A Randomized,Prospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind study, adults with untreated prediabetes (2-hour postoral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] glucose ≥ 140 to 199 mg/dL, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 110 to 125 mg/ dL, or both), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL, and triglycerides < 500 mg/dL were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 16 with last observation carried forward. Secondary end points included change in FPG, hemoglobin A1c (A1C), and 2-hour post-OGTT glucose level from baseline to week 16 and attainment of LDL-C and FPG targets.ResultsIn total, 216 patients were randomized (colesevelam, 108; placebo, 108). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (mean treatment difference, -15.6%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.1%), total cholesterol (-7.2%), apolipoprotein B (-8.1%) (P < .001 for all the foregoing), FPG (median, -2.0 mg/dL; P = .02), and A1C (mean, -0.10%; P = .02). Colesevelam did not significantly change 2-hour post-OGTT glucose (-1.9 mg/dL; P = .75) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.5%; P = .80). In addition, colesevelam significantly increased triglyceride levels relative to placebo (median, 14.3%; P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving target levels with colesevelam versus placebo, respectively, was as follows: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (29% versus 11%; P < .001), A1C < 6.0% (37% versus 25%; P = .05), FPG < 110 mg/dL (48% versus 56%; P = .97), and normalization of glucose (FPG < 100 mg/dL [40% versus 23%; P = .06]). Colesevelam had a weight-neutral effect and was well tolerated.ConclusionColesevelam is an option for managing the lipid profile and normalizing glucose levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes. Further study is warranted to determine whether colesevelam slows or prevents progression of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:617-628)     

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Continued on Oral Antidiabetes Medications in the Hospital

Objective: Basal/basal-bolus insulin with discontinuation of home oral antidiabetes medications (OADs) is the preferred method to achieve glycemic control in many hospitalized patients. We hypothesized that a subset of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can achieve an acceptable level of blood sugar control without cessation of their OADs when hospitalized.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with T2DM who were only on OADs at home, admitted to Fairview Hospital, a community hospital in the Cleveland Clinic Health System. We divided patients into those whose OADs were continued (group 1) and those whose OADs were discontinued (group 2), with or without the addition of insulin in the hospital. Blood glucose (BG) levels and patient characteristics were compared.Results: There were 175 patients, 73 in group 1 and 102 in group 2. The percentage of patients achieving all BG values within 100 to 180 mg/dL was the same between group 1 (21.9%) and group 2 (23.8%) (P = .78). Mean BG was similar between group 1 and group 2 (146.1 ± 41.4 mg/dL versus 152.1 ± 38.9 mg/dL; P = .33), with no significant difference in terms of percentage of patients with hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. A greater proportion of patients in group 1 had an uninterrupted feeding status, nonintensive care unit admission and no contrast dye exposure, and a shorter length of stay.Conclusion: Our study shows that patients with certain characteristics could achieve an acceptable level of glycemic control without cessation of their home OADs.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl dipeptidase 4; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; ICU = intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay; NPO = nil per os; OAD = oral antidiabetes medication; POC = point of care; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Gender Determines Serum Free Cortisol: Higher Levels in Men

Objective: Because only the free fraction of serum cortisol can readily access glucocorticoid receptors, we investigated whether or not a gender-related difference in serum free cortisol (FC) exists in the basal and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-stimulated state.Methods: Serum total cortisol (TC) and FC were measured in 323 subjects (175 men; 148 women). Additionally, the low-dose 1-μg ACTH test was performed in 56 subjects (30 women, 26 men). Subjects were healthy volunteers, recruited in a preventive medicine screening program and an outpatient clinic.Results: Overall, basal serum TC and FC level were ~18 and ~33%, respectively, higher in men than in women (TC, 14.5 ± 0.33 μg/dL vs. 12.3 ± 0.33 μg/dL; P<.0001; FC, 0.68 ± 0.02 μg/dL vs. 0.51 ± 0.02 μg/dL; P<.0001). The higher FC in men relative to women was apparent across a wide age range (17 to 86 years) and persisted after adjustment for age and body mass index. The FC fraction (%FC, out of TC) was concordantly higher in men (5.4 ± 0.09% vs. 4.8 ± 0.3%; P = .046). FC was not related to the estimated menopausal status (women age below and above 47, 50, or 53 years). ACTH-stimulated FC levels were significantly higher in men compared to women, as reflected by the area under the response curve (49.4 ± 3.4 μg × min vs. 39.6 ± 2.2 μg × min; P = .0014).Conclusion: Gender is an unrecognized determinant of serum FC in humans. The possibility of lifelong exposure to the higher bioactive fraction of cortisol under basal conditions or daily stress involving ACTH stimulation should be further investigated in the context of gender-related phenotypic features such as “android” (visceral) fat deposition and longevity.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneBMI = body mass indexCBG = cortisol-binding globulinFC = free cortisolHPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalTC = total cortisol     

The Association of Decreased Serum Gdnf Level with Hyperglycemia and Depression in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Comorbidity of diabetes and depression is a critical problem. Decreased glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been demonstrated in depression, but no evidence of a relationship between GDNF and diabetes has been shown. The present studies were designed to investigate the relationship between GDNF and metabolism.Methods: In Study 1, we performed a case-control study in which subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), prediabetes (p-DM), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included. In Study 2, we performed a cross-sectional study in 296 patients having pre-existing diabetes in whom the levels of serum GDNF, blood glucose, blood lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the EuroQol-5 scale, and the diabetes distress scale were measured, as well as single-nucleotide polymorphisms of GDNF including rs884344, rs3812047, and rs2075680.Results: In Study 1, serum GDNF concentration was significantly lower in the T2DM group than in the NGT group (NGT: 11.706 ± 3.918 pg/mL; p-DM: 10.736 ± 3.722 pg/mL; type 2 diabetes mellitus &lsqb;T2DM group]: 9.884 ± 2.804 pg/mL, P = .008). In Study 2, significantly decreased serum GDNF levels were observed in subjects with poor glycemic control or depression (glycated hemoglobin &lsqb;HbA1c] <7.0% without depression: 11.524 ± 2.903 pg/mL; HbA1c ≥7.0% without depression: 10.625 ± 2.577 pg/mL; HbA1c <7.0% with depression: 10.355 ± 2.432 pg/mL; HbA1c ≥7.0% with depression: 8.824 ± 2.102 pg/mL, P = .008). Double-factor variance analysis showed that glycemic control and depression were independent factors for the GDNF level. Moreover, the serum GDNF level was significantly inversely associated with the fasting plasma glucose, 2 hours postprandial plasma glucose, HbA1c, and PHQ-9 score.Conclusion: Glycemic dysregulation was an independent factor for the GDNF level. These findings suggest that GDNF level might be involved in the pathophysiology of T2DM and depression through various pathways.Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure; CHO = cholesterol; DDS = diabetes distress scale; DM = diabetes mellitus; EQ-5D = the health-related dimensions of the EuroQol-5 scale; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; GDNF = glial-derived neurotrophic factor; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; NGT = normal glucose tolerance; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire; p-DM = prediabetes; PPG = postprandial plasma glucose; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG = triglyceride