Adding VFA to DXA Identifies Fracture Risk in a Way Not Duplicated by Other Measures

Objective: Published studies have demonstrated that adding vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) identifies more patients with increased fracture risk than DXA alone. But who needs VFA? This study attempts to determine if some test other than VFA could duplicate the additional information obtained by performing VFA on all first-time patients. This study looked at the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), height loss, age, documented back pain, and nonvertebral fragility fractures.Methods: VFA was performed on 1,259 (all) DXA patients at their first visit from March 2010 through September 2013. All DXA and VFA results were read by the same International Society for Clinical Densitometry–certified clinician.Results: By DXA alone, 44% were osteoporosis. Adding VFA increased clinical osteoporosis by 36% of the original total patients. Eighty-three “normal bone mineral density” patients were changed to clinical osteoporosis. FRAX identified 53% of the patients with diagnosis changes. Historical height loss was not reliable. Increasing age correlated only weakly with clinical osteoporosis.Conclusion: These are modest numbers from a nonacademic referral practice and may not be typical of other populations. Thirty-six percent of our patients were misclassified by DXA alone, with fragility fractures already taken into account for T-scores of -1.5 and lower. FRAX, height loss, age, back pain, and fragility fractures all failed to identify many of the patients identified by VFA. Seeing the lateral spine images obtained by VFA influenced patients and families. VFA on all first-time patients should be reconsidered.Abbreviations:BMD = bone mineral density; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; FRAX = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; HL = height loss; ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; VF = vertebral fracture; VFA = vertebral fracture assessment     

Transculturalization Recommendations For Developing Latin American Clinical Practice Algorithms In Endocrinology Proceedings Of The 2015 Pan-American Workshop By The American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) convened their first Workshop for recommendations to optimize Clinical Practice Algorithm (CPA) development for Latin America (LA) in diabetes (focusing on glycemic control), obesity (focusing on weight loss), thyroid (focusing on thyroid nodule diagnostics), and bone (focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis) on February 28, 2015, in San Jose, Costa Rica. A standardized methodology is presented incorporating various transculturalization factors: resource availability (including imaging equipment and approved pharmaceuticals), health care professional and patient preferences, lifestyle variables, socio-economic parameters, web-based global accessibility, electronic implementation, and need for validation protocols. A standardized CPA template with node-specific recommendations to assist the local transculturalization process is provided. Participants unanimously agreed on the following five overarching principles for LA: (1) there is only one level of optimal endocrine care, (2) hemoglobin A1C should be utilized at every level of diabetes care, (3) nutrition education and increased pharmaceutical options are necessary to optimize the obesity care model, (4) quality neck ultrasound must be part of an optimal thyroid nodule care model, and (5) more scientific evidence is needed on osteoporosis prevalence and cost to justify intervention by governmental health care authorities. This 2015 AACE/ACE Workshop marks the beginning of a structured activity that assists local experts in creating culturally sensitive, evidence-based, and easy-to-implement tools for optimizing endocrine care on a global scale.Abbreviations:A1C = glycated hemoglobinAACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsACE = American College of EndocrinologyBG = blood glucoseBMI = body mass indexCPA = Clinical Practice AlgorithmCPG = Clinical Practice GuidelineCVD = cardiovascular diseaseDXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryEDC = endocrine-disrupting compoundFBG = fasting blood glucoseFNA = fine-needle aspirationHCP = health care professionalLA = Latin AmericaPAACE = Pan-American AACESU = sulfonylureaT2D = type 2 diabetestDNA = transcultural Diabetes Nutrition AlgorithmTSH = thyroid-stimulating hormoneWC = waist circumferenceWHO = World Health Organization     

Transient Osteoporosis: Clinical Spectrum in Adults and Associated Risk Factors

Objective: We aimed to describe the natural history of the rare clinical syndrome of transient osteoporosis (TO) and ascertain potential risk factors.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adults with TO at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, over 15 years. Adults with acute-onset joint pain worsened by weight bearing and bone marrow edema on magnetic resonance imaging were included; exclusion criteria were trauma, tumors, rheumatic diseases, avascular necrosis, infection, and hyperesthesia.Results: Thirty-three patients with TO were identified: 20 males, median age at diagnosis 47 years, and median body mass index 28 kg/m². Median time to diagnosis was 2 months, and time to symptom resolution was 4 months. All cases involved the lower extremity, with the majority affecting the hip. Most patients (79%) had at least one possible identified risk factor. The most frequent risk factor was low bone mineral density (BMD) in 13 patients (39% of cohort). Of the 16 patients with BMD measure, 8 had low BMD at a site other than TO. The next most frequent risk factors were sudden limb overuse and more than one episode of TO, observed in 30%, followed by a disorder of bone and mineral metabolism in 27%.Conclusion: TO affects middle-age men more than women, primarily involves weight-bearing joints, and usually resolves with conservative management. Its etiology remains unclear; however, the common presence of risk factors, abnormalities in bone and mineral laboratories, and decrease in BMD suggest that systemic factors may be important in its development.Abbreviations: AVN = avascular necrosis; BMD = bone mineral density; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; TO = transient osteoporosis     

Opportunistic Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density By Pet-Ct in Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Objective: Bone density loss and increased risk for osteoporosis are of concern in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Routinely performed positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans could be informative in assessing bone mineral density (BMD).Methods: This retrospective study included 80 adults with newly diagnosed HL treated with standard first-line chemotherapy regimens. PET-CT scans performed at diagnosis (PET-CT₁), at the end of chemotherapy (PET-CT₂), and at follow-up after remission (PET-CT₃) were used to assess BMD changes by measuring lumbar vertebrae CT attenuation. A CT attenuation threshold of 160 Hounsfield units was used to define abnormal BMD.Results: Following chemotherapy, comparison of PET-CT₂ with PET-CT₁ revealed a mean (standard deviation) 14.2% (10.4%) BMD reduction (P<.001). On PET-CT₃ performed at 14.6 (3.25) months after the last course of chemotherapy, a slight improvement (4.6% &lsqb;10.4%]) in comparison to PET-CT₂ was noted. Twelve patients (15%) converted from normal baseline BMD on PET-CT₁ to abnormal BMD after chemotherapy on PET-CT₂. Age, baseline BMD, and steroid cumulative dose were associated with BMD decline and risk for abnormal BMD after chemotherapy. No clinical fractures were reported, and only one rib fracture was incidentally captured (1.25%).Conclusion: HL patients treated with common first-line chemotherapies demonstrate a significant decline in bone density on routine PET-CT scans. Opportunistic use of PET-CT scan has the potential to detect HL patients at high risk for developing osteoporosis and to guide clinicians regarding monitoring and intervention.Abbreviations: BMD = bone mineral density; CT = computed tomography; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; HL = Hodgkin lymphoma; HU = Hounsfield units; L = lumbarvertebra; PET-CT = positron emission tomography-computed tomography; T = thoracic vertebra     

Beyond Dxa: Advances in Clinical Applications of New Bone Imaging Technology

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is generally a very useful tool for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. However, observational studies have shown that in certain instances, BMD as measured by DXA systematically over- or underestimates fracture risk. We herein describe the clinical conundrums encountered when assessing fracture risk by DXA in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or type 2 diabetes and those of Chinese ethnicity. Furthermore, we discuss how advanced imaging technology that examines skeletal microarchitecture is furthering our understanding of fracture risk in these clinical situations.Abbreviations:BMD = bone mineral densityBMI = body mass indexBMS = bone material strengthBMT = bone microindentation testing3D = 3-dimensionalDM2 = type 2 diabetes mellitusDXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryμFEA = microstructural finite element analysisFRAX = fracture risk assessment toolHRpQCT = high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographyID = indentation distanceIDI = indentation distance increaseITS = individual trabecular segmentationPHPT = primary hyperparathyroidismPTH = parathyroid hormoneTBS = trabecular bone score     

The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition

The introduction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the 1980s for the assessment of areal bone mineral density (BMD) greatly benefited the field of bone imaging and the ability to diagnose and monitor osteoporosis. The additional capability of DXA to differentiate between bone mineral, fat tissue, and lean tissue has contributed to its emergence as a popular tool to assess body composition. Throughout the past 2 decades, technological advancements such as the transition from the original pencil-beam densitometers to the most recent narrow fan-beam densitometers have allowed for faster scan times and better resolution. The majority of reports that have compared DXA-derived body composition measurements to the gold standard method of body composition appraisal, the four-compartment model, have observed significant differences with this criterion method; however, the extent to which the technological advancements of the DXA have impacted its ability to accurately assess body composition remains unclear. Thus, this paper reviews the evidence regarding the trueness and precision of DXA body composition measurements from the pencil-beam to the narrow fan-beam densitometers.     

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Consensus Conference of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology

Objective/Methods: Barriers to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use continue to hamper adoption of this valuable technology for the management of diabetes. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology convened a public consensus conference February 20, 2016, to review available CGM data and propose strategies for expanding CGM access.Results: Conference participants agreed that evidence supports the benefits of CGM in type 1 diabetes and that these benefits are likely to apply whenever intensive insulin therapy is used, regardless of diabetes type. CGM is likely to reduce healthcare resource utilization for acute and chronic complications, although real-world analyses are needed to confirm potential cost savings and quality of life improvements. Ongoing technological advances have improved CGM accuracy and usability, but more innovations in human factors, data delivery, reporting, and interpretation are needed to foster expanded use. The development of a standardized data report using similar metrics across all devices would facilitate clinician and patient understanding and utilization of CGM. Expanded CGM coverage by government and private payers is an urgent need.Conclusion: CGM improves glycemic control, reduces hypoglycemia, and may reduce overall costs of diabetes management. Expanding CGM coverage and utilization is likely to improve the health outcomes of people with diabetes.Abbreviations:A1C = glycated hemoglobinAACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsACE = American College of EndocrinologyASPIRE = Automation to Simulate Pancreatic Insulin ResponseCGM = continuous glucose monitoringHRQOL = health-related quality of lifeICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratioJDRF = Juvenile Diabetes Research FoundationMARD = mean absolute relative differenceMDI = multiple daily injectionsQALY = quality-adjusted life yearsRCT = randomized, controlled trialSAP = sensor-augmented pumpSMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucoseSTAR = Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C ReductionT1D = type 1 diabetesT2D = type 2 diabetes     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults and Patients Transitioning from Pediatric to Adult Care

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols.Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence).Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH–stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document.LAY ABSTRACTThis updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH–stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH–stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH–stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone–releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor–binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test     

Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Ambulatory Postmenopausal Women from A Semiurban Region in Southern India: Relationship to Calcium Nutrition and Vitamin D Status

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of osteoporosis in healthy ambulatory postmenopausal Indian women as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and to study the dietary calcium intake and vitamin D status and their influence on bone mineral density (BMD).MethodsWe conducted a community-based crosssectional study in a semiurban region. A randomized cluster sampling technique was used. The study cohort consisted of 150 ambulatory postmenopausal women (≥ 50 years old). Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for BMD was performed at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Dietary calcium intake and biochemical variables were assessed.ResultsThe prevalence of osteoporosis was 48% at the lumbar spine, 16.7% at the femoral neck, and 50% at any site. The mean dietary calcium intake was much lower than the recommended intake for this age-group. There was a significant positive correlation between body mass index and BMD at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck (r = 0.4; P = .0001). BMD at the femoral neck was significantly less (mean, 0.657 versus 0.694 g/cm²) in the vitamin D-insufficient study subjects in comparison with the vitamin D-sufficient women (P = .03).ConclusionThe high prevalence of osteoporosis and vitamin D insufficiency in this semiurban group of postmenopausal women in India is a major health concern. Measures such as adequate calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation in women of this age-group may be beneficial. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:665-671)     

Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis - prevalence, risk factors and methods of assessment

Introduction

Osteoporosis can be a complication of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but diagnosing spinal osteoporosis can be difficult since pathologic new bone formation interferes with the assessment of the bone mineral density (BMD). The aims of the current study were to investigate prevalence and risk factors for reduced BMD in a Swedish cohort of AS patients, and to examine how progressive ankylosis influences BMD with the use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in different projections.

Methods

Methods of assessment were questionnaires, back mobility tests, blood samples, lateral spine radiographs for syndesmophyte grading (mSASSS), DXA of the hip, radius and lumbar spine in anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections with estimation of volumetric BMD (vBMD).

Results

AS patients (modified New York criteria), 87 women and 117 men, mean age 50 ± 13 years and disease duration 15 ± 11 years were included. According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria 21% osteoporosis and 44% osteopenia was diagnosed in patients > = 50 years. Under age 50 BMD below expected range for age was found in 5%. Interestingly lateral lumbar DXA showed significantly lower BMD and revealed significantly more cases with osteoporosis as compared with AP DXA. Lumbar vBMD was not different between sexes, but women had significantly more lumbar osteoporosis measured with AP DXA (P < 0.001). Men had significantly higher mSASSS (P < 0.001). Low BMD was associated with high age, disease duration, mSASSS, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), inflammatory parameters and low body mass index (BMI). Increasing mSASSS correlated significantly with decreasing lateral and volumetric lumbar BMD, while AP lumbar BMD showed tendency to increase.

Conclusions

Osteoporosis and osteopenia is common in AS and associated with high disease burden. Lateral and volumetric lumbar DXA are more sensitive than AP DXA in detecting osteoporosis and are less affected by syndesmophyte formation.     

Correlation Between Bone Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

ObjectiveTo study the relationship between bone markers and bone mineral density (BMD) in an effort to identify their utility in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.MethodsEighty-two consecutive postmenopausal women with untreated osteoporosis were included in the study. Forearm, spinal, and femoral BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and markers of bone formation (serum osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (urinary free deoxypyridinoline) were measured in all patients. Patients with low serum vitamin D levels, secondary osteoporosis, or clinically significant systemic disease were excluded from the study. The patients were classified on the basis of BMD of the lumbar spine into the following 3 groups: mild (n = 23) (T score -2.5 through -3), moderate (n = 42) (T score -3.1 through -4), or severe (n = 17) (T score ≤-4.1) osteoporosis. One-way analysis of variance and Pearson correlation were used for statistical analysis, with a P value < .05 being considered significant.ResultsSerum osteocalcin was significantly different among the 3 study groups (4.1 ± 2.7, 4.5 ± 3.1, and 6.7 ± 5.6 ng/mL, respectively; P = .0349) and had a significant negative correlation with BMD (r² = -0.0779; P = .0168). Other bone markers such as bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary free deoxypyridinoline did not correlate with the underlying BMD.ConclusionIn our study, osteocalcin was significantly correlated with BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Other bone markers did not correlate with BMD. Further large-scale population data and analyses are needed to confirm these findings. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:1102-1107)     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive Clinical Practice Guidelines for Medical Care of Patients with Obesity

Objective: Development of these guidelines is mandated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres to published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent review of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors.Results: There are 9 broad clinical questions with 123 recommendation numbers that include 160 specific statements (85 [53.1%] strong [Grade A], 48 [30.0%] intermediate [Grade B], and 11 [6.9%] weak [Grade C], with 16 [10.0%] based on expert opinion [Grade D]) that build a comprehensive medical care plan for obesity. There were 133 (83.1%) statements based on strong (best evidence level [BEL] 1 = 79 [49.4%]) or intermediate (BEL 2 = 54 [33.7%]) levels of scientific substantiation. There were 34 (23.6%) evidence-based recommendation grades (Grades A-C = 144) that were adjusted based on subjective factors. Among the 1,788 reference citations used in this CPG, 524 (29.3%) were based on strong (evidence level [EL] 1), 605 (33.8%) were based on intermediate (EL 2), and 308 (17.2%) were based on weak (EL 3) scientific studies, with 351 (19.6%) based on reviews and opinions (EL 4).Conclusion: The final recommendations recognize that obesity is a complex, adiposity-based chronic disease, where management targets both weight-related complications and adiposity to improve overall health and quality of life. The detailed evidence-based recommendations allow for nuanced clinical decision-making that addresses real-world medical care of patients with obesity, including screening, diagnosis, evaluation, selection of therapy, treatment goals, and individualization of care. The goal is to facilitate high-quality care of patients with obesity and provide a rational, scientific approach to management that optimizes health outcomes and safety.Abbreviations:A1C = hemoglobin A1cAACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsACE = American College of EndocrinologyAMA = American Medical AssociationBEL = best evidence levelBMI = body mass indexCCO = Consensus Conference on ObesityCPG = clinical practice guidelineCSS = cross-sectional studyCVD = cardiovascular diseaseEL = evidence levelFDA = Food and Drug AdministrationGERD = gastroesophageal reflux diseaseHDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterolIFG = impaired fasting glucoseIGT = impaired glucose toleranceLDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterolMNRCT = meta-analysis of non-randomized prospective or case-controlled trialsNE = no evidencePCOS = polycystic ovary syndromeRCT = randomized controlled trialSS = surveillance studyU.S = United States     

Double Dipper: Comorbid Depression and Diabetes,from a Biomarker to Treatment. Should Endocrinologists be Educated to be at the Forefront of Depression Treatment

Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; GDNF = glial cell–derived neurotrophic factor; GFLs = GDNF family of ligands; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire–9; SSRI = selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Associations of Serum Ionized Calcium,Phosphate, and Pth Levels with Parathyroid Scan in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between various biochemical parameters in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) with positive and negative technetium-99 sestamibi (Tc) parathyroid scans performed with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT).Methods: This retrospective analysis was used to develop a logistic probability model. It included 218 patients with PHPT. The main outcome measures were serum total calcium, ionized calcium, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), albumin, alkaline phosphatase, phosphate, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D, 24-h urinary calcium levels, and parathyroid adenoma weight.Results: Individually, using cut-off levels of 6.0 mg/dL for ionized calcium, 3.0 mg/dL for phosphate, and 90 pg/mL for intact PTH, we found that 91.3% (P = .005), 70.7% (P = .004) and 87.90% (P = .023) of the patients had a positive Tc scan with their corresponding strengths of associations in the parentheses. Similar significant associations were sustained in multivariate setting for serum ionized calcium (P = .015), phosphate (P = .016), and intact PTH (P = .028). A logistic probability model was designed to predict the probability of being positive for Tc scan given a set of covariates.Conclusion: There are significant associations between the levels of serum ionized calcium, phosphate, intact PTH, and Tc scan positivity. Further studies with larger patient populations are needed.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CT = computed tomography; CV = coefficient variation; DXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PHPT = primary hyperparathyroidism; PPV = positive predictive value; PTH = parathyroid hormone; SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography; Tc = technetium-99 sestamibi     

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry And Calculated Frax Risk Scores May Underestimate Osteoporotic Fracture Risk In Vitamin D-Deficient Veterans With Hiv Infection

Objective: We evaluated the utility of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) in assessing fracture risk in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and vitamin D deficiency.Methods: This was a retrospective study of HIV-infected patients with co-existing vitamin D deficiency at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the 10-year fracture risk was calculated by the FRAX algorithm. Two independent radiologists reviewed lateral chest radiographs for the presence of subclinical vertebral fractures.Results: We identified 232 patients with HIV and vitamin D deficiency. Overall, 15.5% of patients met diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis on DEXA, and 58% had low BMD (T-score between -1 and -2.5). The median risk of any major osteoporotic and hip fracture by FRAX score was 1.45 and 0.10%, respectively. Subclinical vertebral fractures were detected in 46.6% of patients. Compared to those without fractures, those with fractures had similar prevalence of osteoporosis (15.3% versus 15.7%; P>.999), low BMD (53.2% versus 59.3%; P = .419), and similar FRAX hip scores (0.10% versus 0.10%; P = .412). While the FRAX major score was lower in the nonfracture group versus fracture group (1.30% versus 1.60%; P = .025), this was not clinically significant.Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of subclinical vertebral fractures among vitamin D–deficient HIV patients; however, DEXA and FRAX failed to predict those with fractures. Our results suggest that traditional screening tools for fragility fractures may not be applicable to this high-risk patient population.Abbreviations:25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin DBMD = bone mineral densityBMI = body mass indexDEXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryFRAX = Fracture Risk Assessment ToolHIV = human immunodeficiency virusIQR = interquartile rangePTH = parathyroid hormoneVA = Veterans AffairsWHO = World Health Organization     

An Italian Survey of Compliance With Major Guidelines for L-Thyroxine of Primary Hypothyroidism

Objective: The adherence by endocrinologists to guideline regarding levothyroxine (LT4) therapy and the compliance of patients may impact the management of hypothyroidism. The aim of this study was to compare the adherence of Italian endocrinologists to the ATA/AACE and ETA guidelines on the management of newly diagnosed primary hypothyroidism and to validate the Italian version of the Morisky-Green Medical Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) questionnaire as applied to the evaluation of the adherence of patients with hypothyroidism to LT4 treatment.Methods: This was an observational, longitudinal, multicenter, cohort study, involving 12 Italian Units of Endocrinology.Results: The study enrolled 1,039 consecutive outpatients (mean age 48 years; 855 women, 184 men). The concordance of Italian endocrinologists with American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American Thyroid Association (AACE/ATA) and European Thyroid Association (ETA) recommendations was comparable (77.1% and 71.7%) and increased (86.7 and 88.6%) after the recommendations on LT4 dose were excluded, considering only the remaining recommendations on diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up. The MMAS-8 was filled out by 293 patients. The mean score was 6.71 with 23.9% low (score <6), 38.6% medium (6 to <8), 37.5% highly (= 8) adherers; the internal validation coefficient was 0.613. Highly adherent patients were not more likely to have good control of hypothyroidism compared with either medium (69% versus 72%, P = .878) or low (69% versus 43%, P = .861) adherers.Conclusion: Clinical management of hypothyroidism in Italy demonstrated an observance of international guidelines by Italian endocrinologists. Validation of the Italian version of the MMAS-8 questionnaire provides clinicians with a reliable and simple tool for assessing the adherence of patients to LT4 treatment.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ATA = American Thyroid Association; EDIPO = Endotrial SIE: DIagnosis and clinical management of Primitive hypothyrOidism in Italy; eCRF = electronic case report form; ETA = European Thyroid Association; fT3 = free triiodothyronine; fT4 = free thyroxine; LT4 = levothyroxine; MMAS-8 = Morisky-Green Medical Adherence Scale-8; PH = primary hypothyroidism; T3 = triiodothyronine; T4 = thyroxine; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone; US = ultrasonography     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis— 2020 Update Executive Summary

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols.Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options.Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.