Assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk: binding of P1 proteins is required for the interaction of P2 proteins

The yeast ribosomal stalk is formed by a protein pentamer made of the 38 kDa P0 and four 12 kDa acidic P1/P2. The interaction of recombinant acidic proteins P1 alpha and P2 beta with ribosomes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4567, lacking all the 12 kDa stalk components, has been used to study the in vitro assembly of this important ribosomal structure. Stimulation of the ribosome activity was obtained by incubating simultaneously the particles with both proteins, which were nonphosphorylated initially and remained unmodified afterward. The N-terminus state, free or blocked, did not affect either the binding or reactivating activity of both proteins. Independent incubation with each protein did not affect the activity of the particles, however, protein P2 beta alone was unable to bind the ribosome whereas P1 alpha could. The binding of P1 alpha alone is a saturable process in acidic-protein-deficient ribosomes and does not take place in complete wild-type particles. Binding of P1 proteins in the absence of P2 proteins takes also place in vivo, when protein P1 beta is overexpressed in S. cerevisiae. In contrast, protein P2 beta is not detected in the ribosome in the P1-deficient D67 strain despite being accumulated in the cytoplasm. The results confirm that neither phosphorylation nor N-terminal blocking of the 12 kDa acidic proteins is required for the assembly and function of the yeast stalk. More importantly, and regardless of the involvement of other elements, they indicate that stalk assembling is a coordinated process, in which P1 proteins would provide a ribosomal anchorage to P2 proteins, and P2 components would confer functionality to the complex.     

Mass spectrometry of ribosomes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for assembly of the stalk complex

The acidic ribosomal P proteins form a distinct protuberance on the 60 S subunit of eukaryotic ribosomes. In yeast this structure is composed of two heterodimers (P1alpha-P2beta and P1beta-P2alpha) attached to the ribosome via P0. Although for prokaryotic ribosomes the isolation of a pentameric stalk complex comprising the analogous proteins is well established, its observation has not been reported for eukaryotic ribosomes. We used mass spectrometry to examine the composition of the stalk proteins on ribosomes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The resulting mass spectra reveal a noncovalent complex of mass 77,291 +/- 7 Da assigned to the pentameric stalk. Tandem mass spectrometry confirms this assignment and is consistent with the location of the P2 proteins on the periphery of the stalk complex, shielding the P1 proteins, which in turn interact with P0. No other oligomers are observed, confirming the specificity of the pentameric complex. At lower m/z values the spectra are dominated by individual proteins, largely from the stalk complex, giving rise to many overlapping peaks. To define the composition of the stalk proteins in detail we compared spectra of ribosomes from strains in which genes encoding either or both of the interacting stalk proteins P1alpha or P2beta are deleted. This enables us to define novel post-translational modifications at very low levels, including a population of P2alpha molecules with both phosphorylation and trimethylation. The deletion mutants also reveal interactions within the heterodimers, specifically that the absence of P1alpha or P2beta destabilizes binding of the partner protein on the ribosome. This implies that assembly of the stalk complex is not governed solely by interactions with P0 but is a cooperative process involving binding to partner proteins for additional stability on the ribosome.     

In vivo analysis of the acidic ribosomal proteins BmP1 and BmP2 of the silkworm Bombyx mori in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In the silkworm Bombyx mori the ribosomal stalk P-protein family consists of two low MW acidic proteins, BmP1 and BmP2, and of one higher MW protein, BmP0, as shown by electrophoretical and immunoblotting western blot analysis of purified ribosomes. Treatment of ribosomes with alkaline phosphatase followed by electrofocusing shifted the isoelectric points to higher pH, implying phosphorylation of the proteins. The cDNAs encoding BmP1 and BmP2 proteins were constructed and expressed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strains defective in either the endogenous P1 or P2 proteins. The recombinant silkworm proteins could complement the absence of the homologous yeast proteins and were incorporated to the ribosomes of the transformed strains, helping the binding of the remaining endogenous acidic proteins, present in the cytoplasm in different extent. Thus, BmP1 was able to replace YP1alpha, preferentially binding YP2beta to the ribosome, while BmP2 replaced both yeast P2 proteins and induced the binding of both YP1alpha and YP1beta.     

Stable binding of the eukaryotic acidic phosphoproteins to the ribosome is not an absolute requirement for in vivo protein synthesis.

The genes encoding the four acidic ribosomal phosphoproteins have been inactivated in Saccharomyces cerevisae by recombination with truncated genes carrying different genetic markers. By crossing single haploid disruptants, strains harboring two simultaneously inactivated acidic protein genes were constructed. None of the six possible double disruptions was lethal, but the simultaneous inactivation of either YP1 alpha and YP1 beta(L44') or YP2 alpha(L44) and YP2 beta(L45) caused an important decrease in the cell growth rate. Ribosomes isolated from these slow-growing strains did not contain acidic proteins, not even the two polypeptides whose genes were still intact, although these proteins were present in the cell extracts and they seem to be able to form high-molecular weight protein complexes. Transformation of a slow-growing double transformant with a plasmid containing one of the disrupted genes restored the presence of the acidic proteins in the ribosomes and normal growth rates. The particles of the slow-growing strains were active in an in vitro amino acid polymerizing system, although their activity could be stimulated by the exogenous addition of the missing proteins. These results indicate that in the absence of either YP1 alpha and YP1 beta(L44') or YP2 alpha (L44) and YP2 beta(L45), the remaining acidic proteins are unable to interact with the ribosome in a stable manner, but that a strong interaction of these ribosomal components with the particle is not an absolute requirement for in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis.     

Pentameric organization of the ribosomal stalk accelerates recruitment of ricin a chain to the ribosome for depurination

Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) depurinate a universally conserved adenine in the α-sarcin/ricin loop (SRL) and inhibit protein synthesis at the translation elongation step. We previously showed that ribosomal stalk is required for depurination of the SRL by ricin toxin A chain (RTA). The interaction between RTA and ribosomes was characterized by a two-step binding model, where the stalk structure could be considered as an important interacting element. Here, using purified yeast ribosomal stalk complexes assembled in vivo, we show a direct interaction between RTA and the isolated stalk complex. Detailed kinetic analysis of these interactions in real time using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) indicated that there is only one type of interaction between RTA and the ribosomal stalk, which represents one of the two binding steps of the interaction with ribosomes. Interactions of RTA with the isolated stalk were relatively insensitive to salt, indicating that nonelectrostatic interactions were dominant. We compared the interaction of RTA with the full pentameric stalk complex containing two pairs of P1/P2 proteins with its interaction with the trimeric stalk complexes containing only one pair of P1/P2 and found that the rate of association of RTA with the pentamer was higher than with either trimer. These results demonstrate that the stalk is the main landing platform for RTA on the ribosome and that pentameric organization of the stalk accelerates recruitment of RTA to the ribosome for depurination. Our results suggest that multiple copies of the stalk proteins might also increase the scavenging ability of the ribosome for the translational GTPases.     

Asymmetric interactions between the acidic P1 and P2 proteins in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk is made of five components, the 32-kDa P0 and four 12-kDa acidic proteins, P1alpha, P1beta, P2alpha, and P2beta. The P0 carboxyl-terminal domain is involved in the interaction with the acidic proteins and resembles their structure. Protein chimeras were constructed in which the last 112 amino acids of P0 were replaced by the sequence of each acidic protein, yielding four fusion proteins, P0-1alpha, P0-1beta, P0-2alpha, and P0-2beta. The chimeras were expressed in P0 conditional null mutant strains in which wild-type P0 is not present. In S. cerevisiae D4567, which is totally deprived of acidic proteins, the four fusion proteins can replace the wild-type P0 with little effect on cell growth. In other genetic backgrounds, the chimeras either reduce or increase cell growth because of their effect on the ribosomal stalk composition. An analysis of the stalk proteins showed that each P0 chimera is able to strongly interact with only one acidic protein. The following associations were found: P0-1alpha.P2beta, P0-1beta.P2alpha, P0-2alpha.P1beta, and P0-2beta.P1alpha. These results indicate that the four acidic proteins do not form dimers in the yeast ribosomal stalk but interact with each other forming two specific associations, P1alpha.P2beta and P1beta.P2alpha, which have different structural and functional roles.     

Characterization of interaction sites in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk components

The interactions among the yeast stalk components (P0, P1alpha, P1beta, P2alpha and P2beta) and with EF-2 have been explored using immunoprecipitation, affinity chromatography and the two-hybrid system. No stable association was detected between acidic proteins of the same type. In contrast, P1alpha and P1beta were found to interact with P2beta and P2alpha respectively. An interaction of P0 with P1 proteins, but not with P2 proteins, was also detected. This interaction is strongly increased with the P0 carboxyl end, which is able to form a pentameric complex with the four acidic proteins. The P1/P2 binding site has been located between residues 212 and 262 using different C-terminal P0 fragments. Immunoprecipitation shows the association of EF-2 with protein P0. However, the interaction is stronger with the P1/P2 proteins than with P0 in the two-hybrid assay. This interaction improves using the 100-amino-acid-long C-end of P0 and is even higher with the last 50 amino acids. The data indicate a specific association of P1alpha with P2beta and of P1beta with P2alpha rather than the dimerization of the acidic proteins found in prokaryotes. In addition, they suggest that stalk assembly begins by the interaction of the P1 proteins with P0. Moreover, as functional interactions of the complete P0 were found to increase using protein fragments, the data suggest that some active sites are exposed in the ribosome as a result of conformational changes that take place during stalk assembly and function.     

The RNA interacting domain but not the protein interacting domain is highly conserved in ribosomal protein P0

Protein P0 interacts with proteins P1alpha, P1beta, P2alpha, and P2beta, and forms the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk. The capacity of RPP0 genes from Aspergillus fumigatus, Dictyostelium discoideum, Rattus norvegicus, Homo sapiens, and Leishmania infantum to complement the absence of the homologous gene has been tested. In S. cerevisiae W303dGP0, a strain containing standard amounts of the four P1/P2 protein types, all heterologous genes were functional except the one from L. infantum, some of them inducing an osmosensitive phenotype at 37 degrees C. The polymerizing activity and the elongation factor-dependent functions but not the peptide bond formation capacity is affected in the heterologous P0 containing ribosomes. The heterologous P0 proteins bind to the yeast ribosomes but the composition of the ribosomal stalk is altered. Only proteins P1alpha and P2beta are found in ribosomes carrying the A. fumigatus, R. norvegicus, and H. sapiens proteins. When the heterologous genes are expressed in a conditional null-P0 mutant whose ribosomes are totally deprived of P1/P2 proteins, none of the heterologous P0 proteins complemented the conditional phenotype. In contrast, chimeric P0 proteins made of different amino-terminal fragments from mammalian origin and the complementary carboxyl-terminal fragments from yeast allow W303dGP0 and D67dGP0 growth at restrictive conditions. These results indicate that while the P0 protein RNA-binding domain is functionally conserved in eukaryotes, the regions involved in protein-protein interactions with either the other stalk proteins or the elongation factors have notably evolved.     

Ribosomal acidic phosphoproteins P1 and P2 are not required for cell viability but regulate the pattern of protein expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with either three inactivated genes (triple disruptants) or four inactivated genes (quadruple disruptants) encoding the four acidic ribosomal phosphoproteins, YP1 alpha, YP1 beta, YP2 alpha, and YP2 beta, present in this species have been obtained. Ribosomes from the triple disruptants and, obviously, those from the quadruple strain do not have bound P proteins. All disrupted strains are viable; however, they show a cold-sensitive phenotype, growing very poorly at 23 degrees C. Cell extracts from the quadruple-disruptant strain are about 30% as active as the control in protein synthesis assays and are stimulated by the addition of free acidic P proteins. Strains lacking acidic proteins do not have a higher suppressor activity than the parental strains, and cell extracts derived from the quadruple disruptant do not show a higher degree of misreading, indicating that the absence of acidic proteins does not affect the accuracy of the ribosomes. However, the patterns of protein expressed in the cells as well as in the cell-free protein system are affected by the absence of P proteins from the particles; a wild-type pattern is restored upon addition of exogenous P proteins to the cell extract. In addition, strains carrying P-protein-deficient ribosomes are unable to sporulate but recover this capacity upon transformation with one of the missing genes. These results indicate that acidic proteins are not an absolute requirement for protein synthesis but regulate the activity of the 60S subunit, affecting the translation of certain mRNAs differently.     

The acidic protein binding site is partially hidden in the free Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk protein P0

The ribosomal stalk is essential for translation; however, its overall structure is poorly understood. Characterization of the region involved in the interactions between protein P0 and the 12 kDa acidic proteins P1 and P2 is fundamental to understand the assembly and function of this structure in the eukaryotic ribosome. The acidic protein content is important for the ribosome efficiency and affects the translation of specific mRNAs. By usage of a series of progressively truncated fragments of protein P0 in the two-hybrid test, a region between positions 213 and 250 was identified as the minimal protein part able to interact with the acidic proteins. Extensions at either end affect the binding capacity of the fragment either positively or negatively depending on the number of added amino acids. Deletions inside the binding region confirm its in vivo relevance since they drastically reduce the P0 interacting capacity with the 12 kDa acidic proteins, which are severely reduced in the ribosome when the truncated protein is expressed in the cell. Moreover, recombinant His-tagged P0 fragments containing the binding site and bound to Ni(2+)-NTA columns can form a complex with the P1 and P2 proteins, which is able to bind elongation factor EF2. The results indicate the existence of a region in P0 that specifically interacts with the acidic proteins. These interactions are, however, hindered by the presence of neighbor protein domains, suggesting the need for conformational changes in the complete P0 to allow the assembly of the ribosomal stalk.     

Role of the ribosomal stalk components in the resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to the sordarin antifungals

Aspergillus fumigatus, an important human nosocomial pathogen, is resistant to sordarin derivatives, a new family of antifungals that inhibit protein synthesis by interaction with the EF-2-ribosomal stalk complex. To explore the role of the A. fumigatus ribosome in the resistance mechanism, the fungal stalk proteins were biochemically and genetically characterized and expressed in the sensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Two acidic phosphoproteins homologous to the 12 kDa P1 and P2 proteins described in other organisms were found together with the 34 kDa P0 protein, the third stalk component. The genes encoding each fungal stalk protein were expressed in mutant S. cerevisiae strains lacking the equivalent proteins. Both AfP1 and AfP2 proteins interact with their yeast counterparts of the opposite type and bind to the ribosomal particles in the presence of either the S. cerevisiae or the A. fumigatus P0 protein. The A. fumigatus acidic phosphoproteins did not alter the yeast ribosome sordarin sensitivity. On the contrary, the presence of the fungal P0 induces in vivo and in vitro resistance to sordarin derivatives when present in the yeast ribosome. The mutations A117-->E, P122-->R and G124-->V in A. fumigatus P0 reduce the resistance capacity of the protein. An S. cerevisiae strain with the complete ribosomal stalk of A. fumigatus was obtained, which could be useful for the screening of new antifungals against this pathogenic fungus.     

The ribosomal stalk is required for ribosome binding,depurination of the rRNA and cytotoxicity of ricin A chain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) like ricin, pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP) and Shiga‐like toxins 1 and 2 (Stx1 and Stx2) share the same substrate, the α‐sarcin/ricin loop, but differ in their specificities towards prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. Ricin depurinates the eukaryotic ribosomes more efficiently than the prokaryotic ribosomes, while PAP can depurinate both types of ribosomes. Accumulating evidence suggests that different docking sites on the ribosome might be used by different RIPs, providing a basis for understanding the mechanism underlying their kingdom specificity. Our previous results demonstrated that PAP binds to the ribosomal protein L3 to depurinate the α‐sarcin/ricin loop and binding of PAP to L3 was critical for its cytotoxicity. Here, we used surface plasmon resonance to demonstrate that ricin toxin A chain (RTA) binds to the P1 and P2 proteins of the ribosomal stalk in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ribosomes from the P protein mutants were depurinated less than the wild‐type ribosomes when treated with RTA in vitro. Ribosome depurination was reduced when RTA was expressed in the ΔP1 and ΔP2 mutants in vivo and these mutants were more resistant to the cytotoxicity of RTA than the wild‐type cells. We further show that while RTA, Stx1 and Stx2 have similar requirements for ribosome depurination, PAP has different requirements, providing evidence that the interaction of RIPs with different ribosomal proteins is responsible for their ribosome specificity.     

Structural differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal stalk proteins P1 and P2 support their functional diversity

The eukaryotic acidic P1 and P2 proteins modulate the activity of the ribosomal stalk but playing distinct roles. The aim of this work was to analyze the structural features that are behind their different function. A structural characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisaie P1 alpha and P2 beta proteins was performed by circular dichroism, nuclear magnetic resonance, fluorescence spectroscopy, thermal denaturation, and protease sensitivity. The results confirm the low structure present in both proteins but reveal clear differences between them. P1 alpha shows a virtually unordered secondary structure with a residual helical content that disappears below 30 degrees C and a clear tendency to acquire secondary structure at low pH and in the presence of trifluoroethanol. In agreement with this higher disorder P1 alpha has a fully solvent-accessible tryptophan residue and, in contrast to P2 beta, is highly sensitive to protease degradation. An interaction between both proteins was observed, which induces an increase in the global secondary structure content of both proteins. Moreover, mixing of both proteins causes a shift of the P1 alpha tryptophan 40 signal, pointing to an involvement of this region in the interaction. This evidence directly proves an interaction between P1 alpha and P2 beta before ribosome binding and suggests a functional complementation between them. On a whole, the results provide structural support for the different functional roles played by the proteins of the two groups showing, at the same time, that relatively small structural differences between the two stalk acidic protein types can result in significant functional changes.     

Yeast ribosomal stalk heterogeneity in vivo shown by two-photon FCS and molecular brightness analysis

The stalk of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomes contains, on average, five distinct proteins, namely P0 and four acidic proteins, P1α, P1β, P2α, and P2β. Each ribosome contains only one copy of P0, but the distribution of the acidic proteins among the ribosome population in vivo has not been determined. Using two-photon fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and scanning FCS, on cells expressing EGFP-tagged P0, P1, and P2 proteins, we show, with brightness analysis, that individual yeast ribosomes in vivo are compositionally heterogeneous in regard to P1α, P1β, P2α, and P2β. These results are relevant to the hypothesis, based on in vitro studies, that the overall cellular pattern of expressed proteins can be determined by the distribution of the stalk proteins among the ribosome population.     

Shiga toxin 1 is more dependent on the P proteins of the ribosomal stalk for depurination activity than Shiga toxin 2

Shiga toxins produced by Escherichia coli O157:H7 are responsible for food poisoning and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). The A subunits of Shiga toxins (Stx1A and Stx2A) inhibit translation by depurinating a specific adenine in the large rRNA. To determine if Stx1A and Stx2A require the ribosomal stalk for depurination, their activity and cytotoxicity were examined in the yeast P protein deletion mutants. Stx1A and Stx2A were less toxic and depurinated ribosomes less in a strain lacking P1/P2 on the ribosome and in the cytosol (ΔP2) than in a strain lacking P1/P2 on the ribosome, but containing free P2 in the cytosol (ΔP1). To determine if cytoplasmic P proteins facilitated depurination, Stx1A and Stx2A were expressed in the P0ΔAB mutant, in which the binding sites for P1/P2 were deleted on the ribosome, and P1/P2 accumulated in the cytosol. Stx1A was less toxic and depurinated ribosomes less in P0ΔAB, suggesting that intact binding sites for P1/P2 were critical. In contrast, Stx2A was toxic and depurinated ribosomes in P0ΔAB as in wild type, suggesting that it did not require the P1/P2 binding sites. Depurination of ΔP1, but not P0ΔAB ribosomes increased upon addition of purified P1α/P2βin vitro, and the increase was greater for Stx1 than for Stx2. We conclude that cytoplasmic P proteins stimulate depurination by Stx1 by facilitating the access of the toxin to the ribosome. Although ribosomal stalk is important for Stx1 and Stx2 to depurinate the ribosome, Stx2 is less dependent on the stalk proteins for activity than Stx1 and can depurinate ribosomes with an incomplete stalk better than Stx1.     

The acidic ribosomal proteins as regulators of the eukaryotic ribosomal activity

The acidic proteins, A-proteins, from the large ribosomal subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown under different conditions have been quantitatively estimated by ELISA tests using rabbit sera specific for these polypeptides. It has been found that the amount of A-protein present in the ribosome is not constant and depends on the metabolic state of the cell. Ribosomes from exponentially growing cultures have about 40% more of these proteins than those from stationary phase. Similarly, the particles forming part of the polysomes are enriched in A-proteins as compared with the free 80 S ribosomes. The cytoplasmic pool of A-protein is considerably high, containing as a whole as much protein as the total ribosome population. These results are compatible with an exchanging process of the acidic proteins during protein synthesis that can regulate the activity of the ribosome. On the other hand, cells inhibited with different metabolic inhibitors produce a very low yield of ribosomes that contain, however, a surprisingly high amount of acidic proteins while the cytoplasmic pool is considerably reduced, suggesting that under stress conditions the ribosome and the A-protein may aggregate, forming complex structures that are not recovered by the standard preparation methods.     

The amino terminal domain from Mrt4 protein can functionally replace the RNA binding domain of the ribosomal P0 protein

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mrt4 protein is a component of the ribosome assembly machinery that shares notable sequence homology to the P0 ribosomal stalk protein. Here, we show that these proteins can not bind simultaneously to ribosomes and moreover, a chimera containing the first 137 amino acids of Mrt4 and the last 190 amino acids from P0 can partially complement the absence of the ribosomal protein in a conditional P0 null mutant. This chimera is associated with ribosomes isolated from this strain when grown under restrictive conditions, although its binding is weaker than that of P0. These ribosomes contain less P1 and P2 proteins, the other ribosomal stalk components. Similarly, the interaction of the L12 protein, a stalk base component, is affected by the presence of the chimera. These results indicate that Mrt4 and P0 bind to the same site in the 25S rRNA. Indeed, molecular dynamics simulations using modelled Mrt4 and P0 complexes provide further evidence that both proteins bind similarly to rRNA, although their interaction with L12 displays notable differences. Together, these data support the participation of the Mrt4 protein in the assembly of the P0 protein into the ribosome and probably, that also of the L12 protein.     

Structure and function of the stalk, a putative regulatory element of the yeast ribosome. Role of stalk protein phosphorylation

The ribosomal stalk is involved directly in the interaction of the elongation factors with the ribosome during protein synthesis. The stalk is formed by a complex of five proteins, four small acidic polypepties and a larger protein which directly interacts with the rRNA at the GTPase center. In eukaryotes, the acidic components correspond to the 12 kDa P1 and P2 proteins, and the RNA binding component is protein P0. All these proteins are found to be phosphorylated in eukaryotic organisms. Previousin vitro data suggested this modification was involved in the activity of this structure. To confirm this possibility a mutational study has shown that phosphorylation takes place at a serine residue close to the carboxyl end of proteins P1, P2 and P0. This serine is part of a consensus casein kinase II phosphorylation site. However, by using a yeast strain carrying a temperature sensitive mutant, it has been shown that CKII is probably not the only enzyme responsible for this modification. Three new protein kinases, RAPI, RAPII and RAPIII, have been purified and compared with CKII and PK60, a previously reported enzyme that phosphorylates the stalk proteins. Differences among the five enzymes have been studied. It has also been found that some typical effects of the PKC kinase stimulate thein vitro phosphorylation of the stalk proteins. All the data available suggest that phosphorylation, although it is not involved in the interaction of the acidic proteins with the ribosome, affects ribosome activity and might participate in some ribosome regulatory mechanism. Presented at theSymposium on Regulation of Translation of Genetic Information by Protein Phosphorylation, 21st Congress of the Czechoslovak Society for Microbiology, Hradec Králové (Czech Republic), September 6–10, 1998.     

Ribosomal stalk protein phosphorylating activities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

With ribosomal P protein as a substrate, five peaks of protein kinase activity are eluted after chromatography of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae cellular extract on DEAE-cellulose. Two of them correspond to CK-II and the other three have been called RAP-1, RAP-II, and RAP-III. RAP-I was previously characterized. RAP-III is present in a very small amount, which hindered its purification. RAP-II was further purified on phosphocellulose, heparin-Sepharose, and P protein-Sepharose, studied in detail, and compared with other acidic protein kinases, including RAP-I, CK-II, and PK60. RAP-II is shown by SDS-PAGE and centrifugation on glycerol linear density gradients to have a molecular mass of around 62 kDa and it is immunologically different from RAP-I and PK60. RAP-II phosphorylates the P proteins in the last serine residue at the highly conserved carboxyl terminal domain as other P-protein kinases. The ribosome-bound stalk P proteins are not equally phosphorylated by the different kinases. Thus, RAP-II and PK60 mainly phosphorylate P1beta and P2alpha whereas RAP-I and CK-II modify all of them. A comparative study of the K(m) and V(max) of the phosphorylation reaction by the different kinases using individual purified acidic proteins suggests changes in the substrate susceptibility upon binding to the ribosome. All the data available reveal clear differences in the characteristics of the various P protein kinases and suggest that the cell may use them to differentially modify the stalk depending, perhaps, on metabolic requirements.     

P1 and P2 protein heterodimer binding to the P0 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is relatively non-specific and a source of ribosomal heterogeneity

The ribosomal stalk is formed by four acidic phosphoproteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, P1α, P1β, P2α and P2β, which form two heterodimers, P1α/P2β and P1β/P2α, that preferentially bind to sites A and B of the P0 protein, respectively. Using mutant strains carrying only one of the four possible P1/P2 combinations, we found a specific phenotype associated to each P1/P2 pair, indicating that not all acidic P proteins play the same role. The absence of one P1/P2 heterodimer reduced the rate of cell growth by varying degrees, depending on the proteins missing. Synthesis of the 60S ribosomal subunit also decreased, particularly in strains carrying the unusual P1α-P2α or P1β-P2β heterodimers, although the distinct P1/P2 dimers are bound with similar affinity to the mutant ribosome. While in wild-type strains the B site bound P1β/P2α in a highly specific manner and the A site bound the four P proteins similarly, both the A and B binding sites efficiently bound practically any P1/P2 pair in mutant strains expressing truncated P0 proteins. The reported results support that while most ribosomes contain a P1α/P2β-P0-P1β/P2α structure in normal conditions, the stalk assembly mechanism can generate alternative compositions, which have been previously detected in the cell.