Role of the response regulator RssB in σS recognition and initiation of σS proteolysis in Escherichia coli

In growing Escherichia coli cells, the master regulator of the general stress response, sigmaS (RpoS), is subject to rapid proteolysis. In response to stresses such as sudden carbon starvation, osmotic upshift or shift to acidic pH, sigmaS degradation is inhibited, sigmaS accumulates and numerous sigmaS-dependent genes with stress-protective functions are activated. sigmaS proteolysis is dependent on ClpXP protease and the response regulator RssB, whose phosphorylated form binds directly to sigmaS in vitro. Here, we show that substitutions of aspartate 58 (D58) in RssB, which result in higher sigmaS levels in vivo, produce RssB variants unable to bind sigmaS in vitro. Thus, RssB is the direct substrate recognition factor in sigmaS proteolysis, whose affinity for sigmaS depends on phosphorylation of its D58 residue. RssB does not dimerize or oligomerize upon this phosphorylation and sigmaS binding, and RssB and sigmaS exhibit a 1:1 stoichiometry in the complex. The receiver as well as the output domain of RssB are required for sigmaS binding (as shown in vivo and in vitro) and for complementation of an rssB null mutation. Thus, the N-terminal receiver domain plays an active and positive role in RssB function. Finally, we demonstrate that RssB is not co-degraded with sigmaS, i.e. RssB has a catalytic role in the initiation of sigmaS turnover. A model is presented that integrates the details of RssB-sigmaS interaction, the RssB catalytic cycle and potential stress signal input in the control of sigmaS proteolysis.     

Back to log phase: σS as a global regulator in the osmotic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli

It is now well established that the σ^S subunit of RNA polymerase is a master regulator in a complex regulatory network that governs the expression of many stationary-phase-inducible genes in Escherichiacoli. In this review, more recent findings will be summarized that demonstrate that σ^S also acts as a global regulator for the osmotic control of gene expression, and actually does so in exponentially growing cells. Thus, many σ^S-dependent genes are induced during entry into stationary phase as well as in response to osmotic upshift. K⁺ glutamate, which accumulates in hyperosmotically stressed cells, seems to specifically stimulate the activity of σ^S-containing RNA polymerase at σ^S-dependent promoters. Moreover, osmotic upshift results in an elevated cellular σ^S level similar to that observed in stationary-phase cells. This increase is the result of a stimulation of rpoS translation as well as an inhibition of the turnover of σ^S, which in exponentially growing non-stressed cells is a highly unstable protein. Whereas the RNA-binding protein HF-I, previously known as a host factor for the replication of phage Qβ RNA, is essential for rpoS translation, the recently discovered response regulator RssB, and ClpXP protease, have been shown to be required for σ^S degradation. The finding that the histone-like protein H-NS is also involved in the control of rpoS translation and σ^S turnover, sheds new light on the function of this protein in osmoregulation. Finally, preliminary evidence suggests that additional stresses, such as heat shock and acid shock, also result in increased cellular σ^S levels in exponentially growing cells. Taken together, σ^S function is clearly not confined to stationary phase. Rather, σ^S may be regarded as a sigma factor associated with general stress conditions.     

Cassette mutagenesis implicates a helix-turn-helix motif in promoter recognition by the novel RNA polymerase Sigma factor σ54

Cassette mutagenesis has been used to study the role of a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif in the novel RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma 54 of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of the four residues which are predicted to be solvent-exposed in the second helix, the first (Glu-378) tolerated all substitutions, and some mutations of this residue increased expression from sigma 54-dependent promoters. Certain substitutions in the third exposed residue (Ser-382) produced a promoter-specific phenotype and all substitutions in the fourth residue (Arg-383) inactivated the protein, identifying this residue as being likely to be involved in base-specific interactions with the promoter. In vivo footprinting indicated that the inactive HTH mutants of sigma 54 were defective in interaction with both the -24 and -12 regions of the glnAp2 promoter.