The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has a crucial role in the complete remodeler set for yeast PHO5 promoter opening

Although yeast PHO5 promoter chromatin opening is a founding model for chromatin remodeling, the complete set of involved remodelers remained unknown for a long time. The SWI/SNF and INO80 remodelers cooperate here, but nonessentially, and none of the many tested single or combined remodeler gene mutations could prevent PHO5 promoter opening. RSC, the most abundant and only remodeler essential for viability, was a controversial candidate for the unrecognized remodeling activity but unassessed in vivo. Now we show that remodels the structure of chromatin (RSC) is crucially involved in PHO5 promoter opening. Further, the isw1 chd1 double deletion also delayed chromatin remodeling. Strikingly, combined absence of RSC and Isw1/Chd1 or Snf2 abolished for the first time promoter opening on otherwise sufficient induction in vivo. Together with previous findings, we recognize now a surprisingly complex network of five remodelers (RSC, SWI/SNF, INO80, Isw1 and Chd1) from four subfamilies (SWI/SNF, INO80, ISWI and CHD) as involved in PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling. This is likely the first described complete remodeler set for a physiological chromatin transition. RSC was hardly involved at the coregulated PHO8 or PHO84 promoters despite cofactor recruitment by the same transactivator and RSC’s presence at all three promoters. Therefore, promoter-specific chromatin rather than transactivators determine remodeler requirements.     

Nucleosome stability at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters correlates with differential cofactor requirements for chromatin opening

The coregulated PHO5 and PHO8 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide typical examples for the role of chromatin in promoter regulation. It has been a long-standing question why the cofactors Snf2 and Gcn5 are essential for full induction of PHO8 but dispensable for opening of the PHO5 promoter. We show that this discrepancy may result from different stabilities of the two promoter chromatin structures. To test this hypothesis, we used our recently established yeast extract in vitro chromatin assembly system, which generates the characteristic PHO5 promoter chromatin. Here we show that this system also assembles the native PHO8 promoter nucleosome pattern. Remarkably, the positioning information for both native patterns is specific to the yeast extract. Salt gradient dialysis or Drosophila embryo extract does not support proper nucleosome positioning unless supplemented with yeast extract. By competitive assemblies in the yeast extract system we show that the PHO8 promoter has greater nucleosome positioning power and that the properly positioned nucleosomes are more stable than those at the PHO5 promoter. Thus we provide evidence for the correlation of inherently more stable chromatin with stricter cofactor requirements.     

Chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter requires SWI-SNF and SAGA at a step subsequent to activator binding

The SWI-SNF and SAGA complexes possess ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling activity and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, respectively. Mutations that eliminate the ATPase activity of the SWI-SNF complex, or the HAT activity of SAGA, abolish proper chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter in vivo. These effects are mechanistically distinct, since the absence of SWI-SNF freezes chromatin in the repressed state, while the absence of Gcn5 permits a localized perturbation of chromatin structure immediately adjacent to the upstream transactivator binding site. However, this remodelling is not propagated to the proximal promoter, and no activation is observed under all conditions. Furthermore, Pho4 is bound to the PHO8 promoter in the absence of Snf2 or Gcn5, confirming a role for SWI-SNF and SAGA in chromatin remodelling independent of activator binding. These data provide new insights into the roles of the SWI-SNF and SAGA complexes in chromatin remodelling in vivo.     

Global role for chromatin remodeling enzymes in mitotic gene expression

Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes, such as SWI/SNF, and histone acetyltransferases, such as Gcn5p. Here we show that SWI/SNF remodeling controls recruitment of Gcn5p HAT activity to many genes in late mitosis and that these chromatin remodeling enzymes play a role in regulating mitotic exit. In contrast, interphase expression of GAL1, HIS3, PHO5, and PHO8 is accompanied by SWI/SNF-independent recruitment of Gcn5p HAT activity. Surprisingly, prearresting cells in late mitosis imposes a requirement for SWI/SNF in recruiting Gcn5p HAT activity to the GAL1 promoter, and GAL1 expression also becomes dependent on both chromatin remodeling enzymes. We propose that SWI/SNF and Gcn5p are globally required for mitotic gene expression due to the condensed state of mitotic chromatin.