Geometry of interaction of the histidine ring with other planar and basic residues

Among the aromatic residues in protein structures, histidine (His) is unique, as it can exist in the neutral or positively charged form at the physiological pH. As such, it can interact with other aromatic residues as well as form hydrogen bonds with polar and charged (both negative and positive) residues. We have analyzed the geometry of interaction of His residues with nine other planar side chains containing aromatic (residues Phe, Tyr, Trp, and His), carboxylate (Asp and Glu), carboxamide (Asn and Gln) and guanidinium (Arg) groups in 432 polypeptide chains. With the exception of the aspartic (Asp) and glutamic (Glu) acid side-chains, all other residues prefer to interact in a face-to-face or offset-face-stacked orientation with the His ring. Such a geometry is different from the edge-to-face relative orientation normally associated with the aromatic-aromatic interaction. His-His pair prefers to interact in a face-to-face orientation; however, when both the residues bind the same metal ion, the interplanar angle is close to 90 degrees. The occurrence of different interactions (including the nonconventional N-H...pi and C-H...pi hydrogen bonds) have been correlated with the relative orientations between the interacting residues. Several structural motifs, mostly involved in binding metal ions, have been identified by considering the cases where His residues are in contact with four other planar moieties. About 10% of His residues used here are also found in sequence patterns in PROSITE database. There are examples of the amino end of the Lys side chain interacting with His residues in such a way that it is located on an arc around a ring nitrogen atom.     

Stereospecific interactions of proline residues in protein structures and complexes

The constrained backbone torsion angle of a proline (Pro) residue has usually been invoked to explain its three-dimensional context in proteins. Here we show that specific interactions involving the pyrrolidine ring atoms also contribute to its location in a given secondary structure and its binding to another molecule. It is adept at participating in two rather non-conventional interactions, C-H...pi and C-H...O. The geometry of interaction between the pyrrolidine and aromatic rings, vis-à-vis the occurrence of the C-H...pi interactions has been elucidated. Some of the secondary structural elements stabilized by Pro-aromatic interactions are beta-turns, where a Pro can interact with an adjacent aromatic residue, and in antiparallel beta-sheet, where a Pro in an edge strand can interact with an aromatic residue in the adjacent strand at a non-hydrogen-bonded site. The C-H groups at the Calpha and Cdelta positions can form strong C-H...O interactions (as seen from the clustering of points) and such interactions involving a Pro residue at C' position relative to an alpha-helix can cap the hydrogen bond forming potentials of the free carbonyl groups at the helix C terminus. Functionally important Pro residues occurring at the binding site of a protein almost invariably engage aromatic residues (with one of them being held by C-H...pi interaction) from the partner molecule in the complex, and such aromatic residues are highly conserved during evolution.     

Geometry of nonbonded interactions involving planar groups in proteins

Although hydrophobic interaction is the main contributing factor to the stability of the protein fold, the specificity of the folding process depends on many directional interactions. An analysis has been carried out on the geometry of interaction between planar moieties of ten side chains (Phe, Tyr, Trp, His, Arg, Pro, Asp, Glu, Asn and Gln), the aromatic residues and the sulfide planes (of Met and cystine), and the aromatic residues and the peptide planes within the protein tertiary structures available in the Protein Data Bank. The occurrence of hydrogen bonds and other nonconventional interactions such as C-H...pi, C-H...O, electrophile-nucleophile interactions involving the planar moieties has been elucidated. The specific nature of the interactions constraints many of the residue pairs to occur with a fixed sequence difference, maintaining a sequential order, when located in secondary structural elements, such as alpha-helices and beta-turns. The importance of many of these interactions (for example, aromatic residues interacting with Pro or cystine sulfur atom) is revealed by the higher degree of conservation observed for them in protein structures and binding regions. The planar residues are well represented in the active sites, and the geometry of their interactions does not deviate from the general distribution. The geometrical relationship between interacting residues provides valuable insights into the process of protein folding and would be useful for the design of protein molecules and modulation of their binding properties.     

Geometry of interaction of metal ions with histidine residues in protein structures

An analysis of the geometry and the orientation of metal ions bound to histidine residues in proteins is presented. Cations are found to lie in the imidazole plane along the lone pair on the nitrogen atom. Out of the two tautomeric forms of the imidazole ring, the NE2-protonated form is normally preferred. However, when bound to a metal ion the ND1-protonated form is predominant and NE2 is the ligand atom. When the metal coordination is through ND1, steric interactions shift the side chain torsional angle, chi 2 from its preferred value of 90 or 270 degrees. The orientation of histidine residues is usually stabilized through hydrogen bonding; ND1-protonated form of a helical residue can form a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen atom in the preceding turn of the helix. A considerable number of ligands are found in helices and beta-sheets. A helical residue bound to a heme group is usually found near the C-terminus of the helix. Two ligand groups four residues apart in a helix, or two residues apart in a beta-strand are used in many proteins to bind metal ions.     

Pi-turns in proteins and peptides: Classification, conformation, occurrence, hydration and sequence.

The i + 5-->i hydrogen bonded turn conformation (pi-turn) with the fifth residue adopting alpha L conformation is frequently found at the C-terminus of helices in proteins and hence is speculated to be a "helix termination signal." An analysis of the occurrence of i + 5-->i hydrogen bonded turn conformation at any general position in proteins (not specifically at the helix C-terminus), using coordinates of 228 protein crystal structures determined by X-ray crystallography to better than 2.5 A resolution is reported in this paper. Of 486 detected pi-turn conformations, 367 have the (i + 4)th residue in alpha L conformation, generally occurring at the C-terminus of alpha-helices, consistent with previous observations. However, a significant number (111) of pi-turn conformations occur with (i + 4)th residue in alpha R conformation also, generally occurring in alpha-helices as distortions either at the terminii or at the middle, a novel finding. These two sets of pi-turn conformations are referred to by the names pi alpha L and pi alpha R-turns, respectively, depending upon whether the (i + 4)th residue adopts alpha L or alpha R conformations. Four pi-turns, named pi alpha L'-turns, were noticed to be mirror images of pi alpha L-turns, and four more pi-turns, which have the (i + 4)th residue in beta conformation and denoted as pi beta-turns, occur as a part of hairpin bend connecting twisted beta-strands. Consecutive pi-turns occur, but only with pi alpha R-turns. The preference for amino acid residues is different in pi alpha L and pi alpha R-turns. However, both show a preference for Pro after the C-termini. Hydrophilic residues are preferred at positions i + 1, i + 2, and i + 3 of pi alpha L-turns, whereas positions i and i + 5 prefer hydrophobic residues. Residue i + 4 in pi alpha L-turns is mainly Gly and less often Asn. Although pi alpha R-turns generally occur as distortions in helices, their amino acid preference is different from that of helices. Poor helix formers, such as His, Tyr, and Asn, also were found to be preferred for pi alpha R-turns, whereas good helix former Ala is not preferred. pi-Turns in peptides provide a picture of the pi-turn at atomic resolution. Only nine peptide-based pi-turns are reported so far, and all of them belong to pi alpha L-turn type with an achiral residue in position i + 4. The results are of importance for structure prediction, modeling, and de novo design of proteins.     

The occurrence of C--H...O hydrogen bonds in alpha-helices and helix termini in globular proteins

A comprehensive database analysis of C--H...O hydrogen bonds in 3124 alpha-helices and their corresponding helix termini has been carried out from a nonredundant data set of high-resolution globular protein structures resolved at better than 2.0 A in order to investigate their role in the helix, the important protein secondary structural element. The possible occurrence of 5 --> 1 C--H...O hydrogen bond between the ith residue CH group and (i - 4)th residue C==O with C...O < or = 3.8 A is studied, considering as potential donors the main-chain Calpha and the side-chain carbon atoms Cbeta, Cgamma, Cdelta and Cepsilon. Similar analysis has been carried out for 4 --> 1 C--H...O hydrogen bonds, since the C--H...O hydrogen bonds found in helices are predominantly of type 5 --> 1 or 4 --> 1. A total of 17,367 (9310 of type 5 --> 1 and 8057 of type 4 --> 1) C--H...O hydrogen bonds are found to satisfy the selected criteria. The average stereochemical parameters for the data set suggest that the observed C--H...O hydrogen bonds are attractive interactions. Our analysis reveals that the Cgamma and Cbeta hydrogen atom(s) are frequently involved in such hydrogen bonds. A marked preference is noticed for aliphatic beta-branched residue Ile to participate in 5 --> 1 C--H...O hydrogen bonds involving methylene Cgamma 1 atom as donor in alpha-helices. This may be an enthalpic compensation for the greater loss of side-chain conformational entropy for beta-branched amino acids due to the constraint on side-chain torsion angle, namely, chi1, when they occur in helices. The preference of amino acids for 4 --> 1 C--H...O hydrogen bonds is found to be more for Asp, Cys, and for aromatic residues Trp, Phe, and His. Interestingly, overall propensity for C--H...O hydrogen bonds shows that a majority of the helix favoring residues such as Met, Glu, Arg, Lys, Leu, and Gln, which also have large side-chains, prefer to be involved in such types of weak attractive interactions in helices. The amino acid side-chains that participate in C--H...O interactions are found to shield the acceptor carbonyl oxygen atom from the solvent. In addition, C--H...O hydrogen bonds are present along with helix stabilizing salt bridges. A novel helix terminating interaction motif, X-Gly with Gly at C(cap) position having 5 --> 1 Calpha--H...O, and a chain reversal structural motif having 1 --> 5 Calpha-H...O have been identified and discussed. Our analysis highlights that a multitude of local C--H...O hydrogen bonds formed by a variety of amino acid side-chains and Calpha hydrogen atoms occur in helices and more so at the helix termini. It may be surmised that the main-chain Calpha and the side-chain CH that participate in C--H...O hydrogen bonds collectively augment the cohesive energy and thereby contribute together with the classical N--H...O hydrogen bonds and other interactions to the overall stability of helix and therefore of proteins.     

Spatial structure of gramicidin A in organic solvents. 1H-NMR analysis of conformation heterogeneity in ethanol

Structural features of double helices formed by polypeptides with alternating L- and D-amino acid residues were analysed. It was found that the map of short distances (less than 4 A) between protons of the two backbones is unique for each double helix type and even its fragment implies unambiguously parameters of the helix (i.e. parallel or antiparallel, handedness, pitch of helix, relative shift of polypeptide chains). By analysis of two-dimensional 1H-NMR spectra (COSY, RELSY, HOHAHA, NOESY), proton resonances of [Val1]gramicidin A (GA) in the ethanol solution were assigned. The results obtained show that the solution contains five stable conformations of GA in comparable concentrations. Monomer of GA is in a random coil conformation. Specific maps of short interproton distances for the other four species (1-4) were obtained by means of two dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy. The maps as well as spin-spin couplings of the H-NC alpha-H protons and solvent accessibilities of the individual amide groups correspond to four types of double helices pi pi LD 5,6 with 5.6 residues per turn. The double helices are related to the Veatch species 1-4 of GA. Species 1 and 2 are left-handed parallel double helices increase increase pi pi LD 5,6 with different relative shift of polypeptide chains. Species 3 is a left-handed antiparallel double helix increase decrease pi pi LD 5,6 and species 4 is a right-handed parallel double helix increase increase LD 5,6. In the dimers helices are fixed by the maximum number (28) of interbackbone hydrogen bonds NH...O = C possible for these structures. Species 1, 3 and 4 have C2 symmetry axes. Relationship between gramicidin A spatial structures induced by various media is discussed.     

Alpha helix capping in synthetic model peptides by reciprocal side chain–main chain interactions: Evidence for an N terminal “capping box”

A significant fraction of the amino acids in proteins are alpha helical in conformation. Alpha helices in globular proteins are short, with an average length of about twelve residues, so that residues at the ends of helices make up an important fraction of all helical residues. In the middle of a helix, H-bonds connect the NH and CO groups of each residue to partners four residues along the chain. At the ends of a helix, the H-bond potential of the main chain remains unfulfilled, and helix capping interactions involving bonds from polar side chains to the NH or CO of the backbone have been proposed and detected. In a study of synthetic helical peptides, we have found that the sequence Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu stabilizes the alpha helix in a series of helical peptides with consensus sequences. Following the report by Harper and Rose, which identifies SerXaaXaaGlu as a member of a class of common motifs at the N termini of alpha helices in proteins that they refer to as “capping boxes,” we have reexamined the side chain–main chain interactions in a varient sequence using ¹H NMR, and find that the postulated reciprocal side chain-backbone bonding between the first Ser and last Glu side chains and their peptide NH partners can be resolved: Deletion of two residues N terminal to the Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu sequence in these peptides has no effect on the initiation of helical structure, as defined by two-dimensional (2D) NMR experiments on this variant. Thus the capping box sequence Ser-Glu-Asp-Glu inhibits N terminal fraying of the N terminus of alpha helix in these peptides, and shows the side chain–main chain interactions proposed by Harper and Rose. It thus acts as a helix initiating signal. Since normal a helix cannot propagate beyond the N terminus of this structure, the box acts as a termination signal in this direction as well. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Solution structure of the sixth transmembrane helix of the G-protein-coupled receptor, rhodopsin

Low resolution electron density maps have revealed the general orientation of the transmembrane helices of rhodopsin. However, high resolution structural information for the transmembrane domain of the G-protein-coupled receptor, rhodopsin, is as yet unavailable. In this study, a high resolution solution structure is reported for a 15 residue portion of the sixth transmembrane helix of rhodopsin (rhovih) as a free peptide. Helix 6 is one of the transmembrane helices of rhodopsin that contains a proline (amino acid residue 267) and the influence of this proline on the structure of this transmembrane domain was unknown. The structure obtained shows an alpha-helix through most of the sequence. The proline apparently induces only a modest distortion in the helix. Previously, the structure of the intradiskal loop connected to helix 6 was solved. The sequence of this loop contained five residues in common (residues 268-272) with the peptide reported here from the rhovih. The five residues in common between these two structures were superimposed to connect these two structures. The superposition showed a root mean square deviation of 0.2 A. Thus, this five residue sequence formed the same structure in both peptides, indicating that the structure of this region is governed primarily by short range interactions.     

Contributions of cation-π interactions to the collagen triple helix stability

Cation–π interactions are found to be an important noncovalent force in proteins. Collagen is a right-handed triple helix composed of three left-handed PPII helices, in which (X–Y-Gly) repeats dominate in the sequence. Molecular modeling indicates that cation–π interactions could be formed between the X and Y positions in adjacent collagen strands. Here, we used a host–guest peptide system: (Pro-Hyp-Gly)₃-(Pro-Y-Gly-X-Hyp-Gly)-(Pro-Hyp-Gly)₃, where X is an aromatic residue and Y is a cationic residue, to study the cation–π interaction in the collagen triple helix. Circular dichroism (CD) measurements and T_m data analysis show that the cation–π interactions involving Arg have a larger contribution to the conformational stability than do those involving Lys, and Trp forms a weaker cation–π interaction with cationic residues than expected as a result of steric effects. The results also show that the formation of cation–π interactions between Arg and Phe depends on their relative positions in the strand. Moreover, the fluorinated and methylated Phe substitutions show that an electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituent on the aromatic ring can modulate its π–electron density and the cation–π interaction in collagen. Our data demonstrate that the cation–π interaction could play an important role in stabilizing the collagen triple helix.     

Helix packing motif common to the crystal structures of two undecapeptides containing dehydrophenylalanine residues: implications for the de novo design of helical bundle super secondary structural modules

De novo designed peptide based super secondary structures are expected to provide scaffolds for the incorporation of functional sites as in proteins. Self-association of peptide helices of similar screw sense, mediated by weak interactions, has been probed by the crystal structure determination of two closely related peptides: Ac-Gly1-Ala2-Delta Phe3-Leu4-Val5-DeltaPhe6-Leu7-Val8-DeltaPhe9-Ala10-Gly11-NH2 (I) and Ac-Gly1-Ala2-DeltaPhe3-Leu4-Ala5-DeltaPhe6-Leu7-Ala8-DeltaPhe9-Ala10-Gly11-NH2 (II). The crystal structures determined to atomic resolution and refined to R factors 8.12 and 4.01%, respectively, reveal right-handed 3(10)-helical conformations for both peptides. CD has also revealed the preferential formation of right-handed 3(10)-helical conformations for both molecules. Our aim was to critically analyze the packing of the helices in the solid state with a view to elicit clues for the design of super secondary structural motifs such as two, three, and four helical bundles based on helix-helix interactions. An important finding is that a packing motif could be identified common to both the structures, in which a given peptide helix is surrounded by six other helices reminiscent of transmembrane seven helical bundles. The outer helices are oriented either parallel or antiparallel to the central helix. The helices interact laterally through a combination of N--H...O, C--H...O, and C--H...pi hydrogen bonds. Layers of interacting leucine residues are seen in both peptide crystal structures. The packing of the peptide helices in the solid state appears to provide valuable leads for the design of super secondary structural modules such as two, three, or four helix bundles by connecting adjacent antiparallel helices through suitable linkers such as tetraglycine segments.     

The G protein-coupled 5-HT1A receptor causes suppression of caspase-3 through MAPK and protein kinase Calpha

Several studies have analysed aromatic interactions, involving mostly phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. Only a few studies have considered histidine as an interacting aromatic residue. An extensive analysis of aromatic His-X interactions is performed here on a data set of 593 PDB structures: 68% of the histidine are involved in aromatic pairs and 1271 non-redundant His-X pairs were analysed. Thirty percent of these pairs involve an aromatic partner less than 6 apart in the sequence. These near-sequence pairs correspond to conformations which stabilise secondary structures, mainly alpha-helices when the residues are 4 apart and beta-strands when they are 2 apart in the sequence. The partners of the other His-X pairs (887, 70%) are more than 5 apart in the sequence. Of these far-sequence pairs, 35% bridge beta strands and only 9% helices. The near-sequence pairs are sterically constrained as supported by conformer distribution. The X partners of far-sequence His-X pairs are mainly "above" the histidine ring with tilted and normal rings, corresponding to a "T shape; face to edge" orientation. Phenylalanine, the only aromatic residue with no heteroatom, is a disfavoured partner, whereas histidine is the preferred one. Heteroatom-heteroatom interactions are favoured in near-sequence as well as in far-sequence His-His, His-Trp and His-Tyr pairs.     

Peptide design using alpha,beta-dehydro amino acids: from beta-turns to helical hairpins

Incorporation of alpha,beta-dehydrophenylalanine (DeltaPhe) residue in peptides induces folded conformations: beta-turns in short peptides and 3(10)-helices in larger ones. A few exceptions-namely, alpha-helix or flat beta-bend ribbon structures-have also been reported in a few cases. The most favorable conformation of DeltaPhe residues are (phi,psi) approximately (-60 degrees, -30 degrees ), (-60 degrees, 150 degrees ), (80 degrees, 0 degrees ) or their enantiomers. DeltaPhe is an achiral and planar residue. These features have been exploited in designing DeltaPhe zippers and helix-turn-helix motifs. DeltaPhe can be incorporated in both right and left-handed helices. In fact, consecutive occurrence of three or more DeltaPhe amino acids induce left-handed screw sense in peptides containing L-amino acids. Weak interactions involving the DeltaPhe residue play an important role in molecular association. The C--H.O==C hydrogen bond between the DeltaPhe side-chain and backbone carboxyl moiety, pi-pi stacking interactions between DeltaPhe side chains belonging to enantiomeric helices have shown to stabilize folding. The unusual capability of a DeltaPhe ring to form the hub of multicentered interactions namely, a donor in aromatic C--H.pi and C--H.O==C and an acceptor in a CH(3).pi interaction suggests its exploitation in introducing long-range interactions in the folding of supersecondary structures.     

Hydrogen bonds with pi-acceptors in proteins: frequencies and role in stabilizing local 3D structures

A comprehensive structural analysis of X--H...pi hydrogen bonding in proteins is performed based on 592 published high-resolution crystal structures (< or = 1.6 A). All potential donors and acceptors are considered, including acidic C--H groups. The sample contains 1311 putative X--H...pi hydrogen bonds with N--H, O--H or S--H donors, that is about one per 10.8 aromatic residues. By far the most efficient pi-acceptor is the side-chain of Trp, which accepts one X--H...pi hydrogen bond per 5.7 residues. The focus of the analysis is on recurrent structural patterns involving regular secondary structure elements. Numerous examples are found where peptide X--H...pi interactions are functional in stabilization of helix termini, strand ends, strand edges, beta-bulges and regular turns. Side-chain X--H...pi hydrogen bonds are formed in considerable numbers in alpha-helices and beta-sheets. Geometrical data on various types of X--H...pi hydrogen bonds are given.     

Interaction of transmembrane helices by a knobs-into-holes packing characteristic of soluble coiled coils

Membrane-embedded protein domains frequently exist as α-helical bundles, as exemplified by photosynthetic reaction centers, bacteriorhodopsin, and cytochrome C oxidase. The sidechain packing between their transmembrane helices was investigated by a nearest-neighbor analysis which identified sets of interfacial residues for each analyzed helix–helix interface. For the left-handed helix–helix pairs, the interfacial residues almost exclusively occupy positions a, d, e, or g within a heptad motif (abcdefg) which is repeated two to three times for each interacting helical surface. The connectivity between the interfacial residues of adjacent helices conforms to the knobs-into-holes type of sidechain packing known from soluble coiled coils. These results demonstrate on a quantitative basis that the geometry of sidechain packing is similar for left-handed helix–helix pairs embedded in membranes and coiled coils of soluble proteins. The transmembrane helix–helix interfaces studied are somewhat less compact and regular as compared to soluble coiled coils and tolerate all hydrophobic amino acid types to similar degrees. The results are discussed with respect to previous experimental findings which demonstrate that specific interactions between transmembrane helices are important for membrane protein folding and/or oligomerization. Proteins 31:150–159, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Conformational dynamics is more important than helical propensity for the folding of the all α‐helical protein Im7

Im7 folds via an on‐pathway intermediate that contains three of the four native α‐helices. The missing helix, helix III, is the shortest and its failure to be formed until late in the pathway is related to frustration in the structure. Im7H3M3, a 94‐residue variant of the 87‐residue Im7 in which helix III is the longest of the four native helices, also folds via an intermediate. To investigate the structural basis for this we calculated the frustration in the structure of Im7H3M3 and used NMR to investigate its dynamics. We found that the native state of Im7H3M3 is highly frustrated and in equilibrium with an intermediate state that lacks helix III, similar to Im7. Model‐free analysis identified residues with chemical exchange contributions to their relaxation that aligned with the residues predicted to have highly frustrated interactions, also like Im7. Finally, we determined properties of urea‐denatured Im7H3M3 and identified four clusters of interacting residues that corresponded to the α‐helices of the native protein. In Im7 the cluster sizes were related to the lengths of the α‐helices with cluster III being the smallest but in Im7H3M3 cluster III was also the smallest, despite this region forming the longest helix in the native state. These results suggest that the conformational properties of the urea‐denatured states promote formation of a three‐helix intermediate in which the residues that form helix III remain non‐helical. Thus it appears that features of the native structure are formed early in folding linked to collapse of the unfolded state.     

Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins. Near- and far-sequence His–X pairs

Several studies have analysed aromatic interactions, involving mostly phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. Only a few studies have considered histidine as an interacting aromatic residue. An extensive analysis of aromatic His–X interactions is performed here on a data set of 593 PDB structures: 68% of the histidine are involved in aromatic pairs and 1271 non-redundant His–X pairs were analysed. Thirty percent of these pairs involve an aromatic partner less than 6 apart in the sequence. These near-sequence pairs correspond to conformations which stabilise secondary structures, mainly α-helices when the residues are 4 apart and β-strands when they are 2 apart in the sequence. The partners of the other His–X pairs (887, 70%) are more than 5 apart in the sequence. Of these far-sequence pairs, 35% bridge beta strands and only 9% helices. The near-sequence pairs are sterically constrained as supported by conformer distribution. The X partners of far-sequence His–X pairs are mainly “above” the histidine ring with tilted and normal rings, corresponding to a “T shape; face to edge” orientation. Phenylalanine, the only aromatic residue with no heteroatom, is a disfavoured partner, whereas histidine is the preferred one. Heteroatom–heteroatom interactions are favoured in near-sequence as well as in far-sequence His–His, His–Trp and His–Tyr pairs.     

Geometry of nonbonded interactions involving planar groups in proteins

Although hydrophobic interaction is the main contributing factor to the stability of the protein fold, the specificity of the folding process depends on many directional interactions. An analysis has been carried out on the geometry of interaction between planar moieties of ten side chains (Phe, Tyr, Trp, His, Arg, Pro, Asp, Glu, Asn and Gln), the aromatic residues and the sulfide planes (of Met and cystine), and the aromatic residues and the peptide planes within the protein tertiary structures available in the Protein Data Bank. The occurrence of hydrogen bonds and other nonconventional interactions such as C–H⋯π, C–H⋯O, electrophile–nucleophile interactions involving the planar moieties has been elucidated. The specific nature of the interactions constraints many of the residue pairs to occur with a fixed sequence difference, maintaining a sequential order, when located in secondary structural elements, such as α-helices and β-turns. The importance of many of these interactions (for example, aromatic residues interacting with Pro or cystine sulfur atom) is revealed by the higher degree of conservation observed for them in protein structures and binding regions. The planar residues are well represented in the active sites, and the geometry of their interactions does not deviate from the general distribution. The geometrical relationship between interacting residues provides valuable insights into the process of protein folding and would be useful for the design of protein molecules and modulation of their binding properties.     

Conformational and sequence signatures in beta helix proteins

beta helix proteins are characterized by a repetitive fold, in which the repeating unit is a beta-helical coil formed by three strand segments linked by three loop segments. Using a data set of left- and right-handed beta helix proteins, we have examined conformational features at equivalent positions in successive coils. This has provided insights into the conformational rules that the proteins employ to fold into beta helices. Left-handed beta helices attain their equilateral prism fold by incorporating "corners" with the conformational sequence P(II)-P(II)-alpha(L)-P(II), which imposes sequence restrictions, resulting in the first and third P(II) residues often being G and a small, uncharged residue (V, A, S, T, C), respectively. Right-handed beta helices feature mid-sized loops (4, 5, or 6 residues) of conserved conformation, but not of conserved sequence; they also display an alpha-helical residue at the C-terminal end of L2 loops. Backbone conformational parameters (phi,psi) that permit the formation of continuous, loopless beta helices (Perutz nanotubes) have also been investigated.