Biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine in bacteria

Phosphatidylcholine (PC) is the major membrane-forming phospholipid in eukaryotes and can be synthesized by either of two pathways, the methylation pathway or the CDP-choline pathway. Many prokaryotes lack PC, but it can be found in significant amounts in membranes of rather diverse bacteria and based on genomic data, we estimate that more than 10% of all bacteria possess PC. Enzymatic methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine via the methylation pathway was thought to be the only biosynthetic pathway to yield PC in bacteria. However, a choline-dependent pathway for PC biosynthesis has been discovered in Sinorhizobium meliloti. In this pathway, PC synthase, condenses choline directly with CDP-diacylglyceride to form PC in one step. A number of symbiotic (Rhizobium leguminosarum, Mesorhizobium loti) and pathogenic (Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Brucella melitensis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Borrelia burgdorferi and Legionella pneumophila) bacteria seem to possess the PC synthase pathway and we suggest that the respective eukaryotic host functions as the provider of choline for this pathway. Pathogens entering their hosts through epithelia (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae) require phosphocholine substitutions on their cell surface components that are biosynthetically also derived from choline supplied by the host. However, the incorporation of choline in these latter cases proceeds via choline phosphate and CDP-choline as intermediates. The occurrence of two intermediates in prokaryotes usually found as intermediates in the eukaryotic CDP-choline pathway for PC biosynthesis raises the question whether some bacteria might form PC via a CDP-choline pathway.     

Two-component signal-transduction systems in budding yeast MAP a different pathway?

Until recently, two-component signal-transduction pathways were thought to be exclusively found in bacteria. Some eukaryotic examples have now been characterized but, at least in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it appears that this type of signal-transduction pathway is not utilized as extensively as in bacteria. Further, the few eukaryotic examples described suggest that two-component signal-transduction pathways might not be freestanding, as in prokaryotes, but might effect gene expression by regulating eukaryotic mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways.     

Bioinformatic Characterization of the Trimeric Intracellular Cation-Specific Channel Protein Family

Trimeric intracellular cation-specific (TRIC) channels are integral to muscle excitation–contraction coupling. TRIC channels provide counter-ionic flux when calcium is rapidly transported from intracellular stores to the cell cytoplasm. Until recently, knowledge of the presence of these proteins was limited to animals. We analyzed the TRIC family and identified a profusion of prokaryotic family members with topologies and motifs similar to those of their eukaryotic counterparts. Prokaryotic members far outnumber eukaryotic members, and although none has been functionally characterized, the evidence suggests that they function as secondary carriers. The presence of fused N- or C-terminal domains of known biochemical functions as well as genomic context analyses provide clues about the functions of these prokaryotic homologs. They are proposed to function in metabolite (e.g., amino acid/nucleotide) efflux. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that TRIC channel homologs diverged relatively early during evolutionary history and that horizontal gene transfer was frequent in prokaryotes but not in eukaryotes. Topological analyses of TRIC channels revealed that these proteins possess seven putative transmembrane segments (TMSs), which arose by intragenic duplication of a three-TMS polypeptide-encoding genetic element followed by addition of a seventh TMS at the C terminus to give the precursor of all current TRIC family homologs. We propose that this family arose in prokaryotes.     

Seeking the determinants of the elusive functions of Sco proteins

Sco proteins are present in all types of organisms, including the vast majority of eukaryotes and many prokaryotes. It is well established that Sco proteins in eukaryotes are involved in the assembly of the Cu(A) cofactor of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase; however their precise role in this process has not yet been elucidated at the molecular level. In particular, some but not all eukaryotes including humans possess two Sco proteins whose individual functions remain unclear. There is evidence that eukaryotic Sco proteins are also implicated in other cellular processes such as redox signalling and regulation of copper homeostasis. The range of physiological functions of Sco proteins appears to be even wider in prokaryotes, where Sco-encoding genes have been duplicated many times during evolution. While some prokaryotic Sco proteins are required for the biosynthesis of cytochrome c oxidase, others are most likely to take part in different processes such as copper delivery to other enzymes and protection against oxidative stress. The detailed understanding of the multiplicity of roles ascribed to Sco proteins requires the identification of the subtle determinants that modulate the two properties central to their known and potential functions, i.e. copper binding and redox properties. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge on Sco proteins gained by genetic, structural and functional studies on both eukaryotic and prokaryotic homologues, and propose some hints to unveil the elusive molecular mechanisms underlying their functions.     

Ancient Fungal Life in North Pacific Eocene Oceanic Crust

We present evidence that eukaryotic life has existed in an extreme environment, inside the oceanic crust. Up to now only prokaryotes have been discovered within deep marine sediments and glass-rims of pillow basalts, no higher life forms are described as yet. This study demonstrates unique filamentous fossil structures observed within carbonate-filled vesicles of a massive lava flow unit from the upper oceanic crust in the North Pacific (ODP Site 1224). Based on morphological traits including branching, septa and central pores, the filaments are interpreted as fungi. The chemical composition of the fungal structures differs from the surrounding crystalline carbonate matrix in the deep basaltic rocks. Small open space between the fungi and the carbonate cement and undisturbed filamentous growth through different calcite crystals indicate endolithic fungal growth after the calcium carbonate filling. The presence of euhedral pyrite crystals within the carbonate cements points out anaerobic conditions in this habitat. Our results provide for the first time evidence for eukaryotic, fungal life in deep ocean basaltic rocks.     

Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes and between prokaryotes and eukaryotes

The evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes and between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is examined based on protein sequence data. Phylogenies and common signature sequences in some of the most conserved proteins point to a close evolutionary relationship between Archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria. The monophyletic nature and distinctness of the Archaebacterial domain is not supported by many of the phylogenies. Within Gram-negative bacteria, cyanobacteria are indicated as the deepest branching lineage, and a clade consisting of Archaebacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and cyanobacteria is supported by signature sequences in many proteins. However, the division within the prokaryotic species viz. Archaebacteria Gram-positive bacteria Cyanobacteria other groups of Gram-negative bacteria, is indicated to be not very rigid but, instead is an evolutionary continuum. It is expected that certain species will be found which represent intermediates in the above transitions. By contrast to the evolutionary relationships within prokaryotes, the eukaryotic species, which are structurally very different, appear to have originated by a very different mechanism. Protein phylogenies and signature sequences provide evidence that the eukaryotic nuclear genome is a chimera which has received major contributions from both an Archaebacterium and a Gram-negative bacterium. To explain these observations, it is suggested that the ancestral eukaryotic cell arose by a symbiotic fusion event between the above parents and that this fusion event led to the origin of both nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum. The monophyletic nature of all extant eukaryotic species further suggests that a 'successful primary fusion' between the prokaryotic species that gave rise to the ancestral eukaryotic cell took place only once in the history of this planet.     

The Compartmentalized Bacteria of the Planctomycetes-Verrucomicrobia-Chlamydiae Superphylum Have Membrane Coat-Like Proteins

The development of the endomembrane system was a major step in eukaryotic evolution. Membrane coats, which exhibit a unique arrangement of β-propeller and α-helical repeat domains, play key roles in shaping eukaryotic membranes. Such proteins are likely to have been present in the ancestral eukaryote but cannot be detected in prokaryotes using sequence-only searches. We have used a structure-based detection protocol to search all proteomes for proteins with this domain architecture. Apart from the eukaryotes, we identified this protein architecture only in the Planctomycetes-Verrucomicrobia-Chlamydiae (PVC) bacterial superphylum, many members of which share a compartmentalized cell plan. We determined that one such protein is partly localized at the membranes of vesicles formed inside the cells in the planctomycete Gemmata obscuriglobus. Our results demonstrate similarities between bacterial and eukaryotic compartmentalization machinery, suggesting that the bacterial PVC superphylum contributed significantly to eukaryogenesis.     

Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements

Background  

In eukaryotes, RNA interference (RNAi) is a major mechanism of defense against viruses and transposable elements as well of regulating translation of endogenous mRNAs. The RNAi systems recognize the target RNA molecules via small guide RNAs that are completely or partially complementary to a region of the target. Key components of the RNAi systems are proteins of the Argonaute-PIWI family some of which function as slicers, the nucleases that cleave the target RNA that is base-paired to a guide RNA. Numerous prokaryotes possess the CRISPR-associated system (CASS) of defense against phages and plasmids that is, in part, mechanistically analogous but not homologous to eukaryotic RNAi systems. Many prokaryotes also encode homologs of Argonaute-PIWI proteins but their functions remain unknown.     

Evidence for the symbiotic origin of mitochondria

There are numerous characteristics in which mitochondria resemble bacteria and differ from the enveloping eukaryotic cell. These similarities and differences have been offered in support of the symbiotic origin of mitochondria. Such evidence, no matter how striking, can be faulted as representing retained primitive genome if the characteristics being compared evolved prior to the divergence of protoeukaryotes from prokaryotes. In contrast, if a characteristic evolved after this evolutionary divergence, in response to a relatively recent environmental change, it could serve as a clear marker of the symbiotic event. The enzyme superoxide dismutase, which serves as a defense against oxygen toxicity, need not have existed prior to the accumulation of photosynthetic oxygen. It probably evolved after the appearance of blue-green algae and it was apparently evolved independently by prokaryotes and by protoeukaryotes. The superoxide dismutases found in prokaryotes and in mitochondria are remarkably similar in gross properties and in amino acid sequence; whereas the corresponding enzyme of the eukaryotic cytoplasm is entirely different. This represents support for the symbiotic origin of mitochondria which is not easily argued away.     

Structural and genetic relationships between cytosolic and mitochondrial isoenzymes

The most common type of genetic relationship between cytosolic and mitochondrial isoenzymes will probably be found to be divergent evolution from a common ancestral form. This is firmly established for the aspartate aminotransferases and less directly so in other cases. The two isoenzymes of aspartate aminotransferase have evolved at roughly equal rates at the level of total amino acid sequence but certain limited surface regions of the mitochondrial form have been much more highly conserved than corresponding regions in the cytosolic protein; these regions probably play a role in topogenesis of the mitochondrial isoenzyme. It is of interest that nearly all mitochondrial proteins are initially synthesised as precursors of molecular weight greater than the mature forms. In the case of aspartate aminotransferase, and possibly of other such isoenzymes, the N-terminus of the mature protein is nearly coincident with that of the cytosolic isoenzyme. Hence during evolution either the gene for the mitochondrial isoenzyme has gained an extra coding region for this N-terminal extension or, less likely, the structural gene for the cytosolic form has suffered a sizeable terminal deletion. Cytosolic and mitochondrial superoxide dismutases have not shared a common ancestral form as shown by the fact that their primary structures are completely unrelated. On the other hand, the mitochondrial and prokaryotic enzymes are clearly related. There is now, however, evidence to suggest that some prokaryotes possess a copper/zinc enzyme related to the eukaryotic cytosolic form. Hence the possibility arises that primitive prokaryotes possessed both proteins. The copper/zinc superoxide dismutase has been retained in the cytosol of eukaryotic cells and a few bacterial species.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Bioenergetic Constraints on the Evolution of Complex Life

All morphologically complex life on Earth, beyond the level of cyanobacteria, is eukaryotic. All eukaryotes share a common ancestor that was already a complex cell. Despite their biochemical virtuosity, prokaryotes show little tendency to evolve eukaryotic traits or large genomes. Here I argue that prokaryotes are constrained by their membrane bioenergetics, for fundamental reasons relating to the origin of life. Eukaryotes arose in a rare endosymbiosis between two prokaryotes, which broke the energetic constraints on prokaryotes and gave rise to mitochondria. Loss of almost all mitochondrial genes produced an extreme genomic asymmetry, in which tiny mitochondrial genomes support, energetically, a massive nuclear genome, giving eukaryotes three to five orders of magnitude more energy per gene than prokaryotes. The requirement for endosymbiosis radically altered selection on eukaryotes, potentially explaining the evolution of unique traits, including the nucleus, sex, two sexes, speciation, and aging.Evolutionary theory has enormous explanatory power and is understood in detail at the molecular genetic level, yet it cannot easily predict even the past. The history of life on Earth is troubling. Life apparently arose very early, perhaps 4 billion years ago, but then remained essentially bacterial for probably some 2–3 billion years. Bacteria and archaea explored almost every conceivable metabolic niche and still dominate in terms of biomass. Yet, in morphological diversity and genomic complexity, bacteria barely begin to compare with eukaryotes, even at the level of cells, let alone multicellular plants and animals. Eukaryotes are monophyletic and share a common ancestor that by definition arose only once, probably between 1.5 and 2 billion years ago, although the dates are poorly constrained (Knoll et al. 2006; Parfrey et al. 2011). The eukaryotic common ancestor already had a nucleus, nuclear pore complexes, introns and exons, straight chromosomes, mitosis and meiotic sex, a dynamic cytoskeleton, an endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria, making it difficult to trace the evolution of these traits from a prokaryotic state (Koonin 2010). The “eukaryotic niche”—limited metabolic diversity but enormous morphological complexity—was never invaded by prokaryotes. In short, life arose early, stagnated in morphological complexity for several billion years, and then rather abruptly gave rise to a single group—the eukaryotes—which explored the morphological realm of life in ways never seen in bacteria or archaea.Consider the possibility of life evolving on other planets. Would it follow a similar trajectory? If not, why not? Evolutionary theory gives little insight. The perplexing history of life on Earth conceals a paradox relating to natural selection. If basal eukaryotic traits such as the nucleus, meiotic sex, and phagocytosis arose by selection, starting with a prokaryotic ancestor, and each step offered some small advantage over the last, then why don’t the same traits arise repeatedly in prokaryotes too? Prokaryotes made many a start. There are examples of bacteria or archaea with nucleus-like structures (Lindsay et al. 2001), recombination (Smith et al. 1993), linear chromosomes (Bentley et al. 2002), internal membranes (Pinevich 1997), multiple replicons (Robinson and Bell 2007), giant size (Schulz and Jorgensen 2001), extreme polyploidy (Mendell et al. 2008), a dynamic cytoskeleton (Vats and Rothfield 2009), predation (Davidov and Jurkevitch 2009), parasitism (Moran 2007), introns and exons (Simon and Zimmerly 2008), intercellular signaling (Waters and Bassler 2005), endocytosis-like processes (Lonhienne et al. 2010), and even endosymbionts (Wujek 1979; von Dohlen et al. 2001). Yet, for each of these traits, bacteria and archaea stopped well short of the baroque complexity of eukaryotes. Compare this with the evolution of eyes. From a simple, light-sensitive spot in an early metazoan, morphologically disparate eyes arose on scores of occasions (Vopalensky and Kozmic 2009). This is exactly what evolutionary theory predicts. Each step offers an advantage in its own ecological setting, so morphologically different eyes arise on multiple occasions. Why is this not the case for traits such as the nucleus, meiotic sex, and phagocytosis? To suggest that lateral gene transfer (LGT) or bacterial conjugation is equivalent to meiotic sex will not do: Neither involves a systematic and reciprocal exchange of alleles across the entire genome.The simplest explanation is a bottleneck. The “big bang” radiation of major eukaryotic supergroups, combined with the apparent absence of surviving evolutionary intermediates between prokaryotes and the last eukaryotic common ancestor, does indeed hint at a bottleneck at the origin of eukaryotes. There is no shortage of environmental possibilities, from snowball glaciations to rising atmospheric oxygen. The most widely held explanation contends that when oxygen levels rose after the great oxidation event, some proto-eukaryotic cells acquired mitochondria, which protected them against oxygen toxicity (Andersson and Kurland 1999) and enabled them to exploit oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor in respiration (Sagan 1967), giving the first eukaryotes an enormous competitive advantage. They swiftly occupied new niches made available by oxygen, outcompeting to extinction any other prokaryotes that tried subsequently to invade this niche (de Duve 2007; Gross and Bhattacharya 2010). But this is an evolutionary “just-so story” and has no evidence to support it. The idea that mitochondria might protect against oxygen toxicity is nonsense: The single-electron donors of respiratory chains are among the most potent free-radical generators known. And what was to stop facultatively aerobic bacteria—from which the mitochondria evolved, hence already present—from occupying the aerobic niche first?In fact, the limited evidence available suggests that oxygen had little to do with it (Müller et al. 2012; van der Giezen and Lenton 2012). A large, diverse group of morphologically simple protists dubbed archezoa are the key here. The archezoa appear to lack mitochondria; and three decades ago, looked to branch deeply in the eukaryotic tree. Cavalier-Smith postulated that some archezoa might be primitively amitochondriate: surviving evolutionary intermediates between prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Cavalier-Smith 1987, 1989). But 20 years of careful molecular biology and phylogenetics have shown that all known archezoa possess specialized organelles that derive from mitochondria, namely hydrogenosomes or mitosomes (Keeling 1998; Embley and Martin 2006; van der Giezen 2009; Archibald 2011). The archezoa are obviously not real evolutionary intermediates, and radical developments in phylogenomics have transformed the eukaryotic tree to a “big-bang” radiation with no early branching archezoa (Koonin 2010). The archezoa remain significant not because they are genuine evolutionary intermediates, but because they are true ecological intermediates. Critically, they were not outcompeted to extinction by more sophisticated aerobic eukaryotes. On the contrary, they lost their capacity for aerobic respiration and depend instead on anaerobic fermentations, yet remain, morphologically, more complex than bacteria or archaea.The fact that the archezoa are a phylogenetically disparate group that arose on multiple occasions is equally significant. The “intermediate” niche is viable and was invaded many times, without the new arrivals being outcompeted to extinction by existing cells, or vice versa. Yet each time the invader was an anaerobic eukaryote, which adapted by reductive evolution to the niche—not bacteria or archaea evolving slightly greater complexity. What is the likelihood of this bias? Given at least 20 independent origins of archezoa (van der Giezen 2009; Müller et al. 2012), the probability of these ecological intermediates arising each time from the eukaryotes rather than prokaryotes is less than one in a million. It is far more parsimonious to assume that there was something about the structure of eukaryotes that facilitated their invasion of this intermediate niche; and, conversely, something about the structure of prokaryotes that tended to preclude their evolution of greater morphological complexity. But this quite reasonable statement is loaded because it implies that prokaryotes existed for nearly 4 billion years, and throughout that time showed no tendency to evolve greater morphological complexity. In stark contrast, eukaryotes arose just once, a seemingly improbable event.Here I argue that the constraint on prokaryotes was bioenergetic. There was, indeed, a bottleneck at the origin of eukaryotes, but it was biological (restrictive), not environmental (selective). It related to the physical structure of prokaryotic cells: Both bacteria and archaea respire across their plasma membrane. I make three key points, which arguably apply to life elsewhere in the universe, and are therefore proposed as biological principles that could guide our understanding of life generally: (1) chemiosmotic coupling is as universal as the genetic code, for fundamental reasons relating to the origin of life; (2) prokaryotes are constrained by chemiosmotic coupling across their plasma membrane, but eukaryotes escaped this constraint through a rare and stochastic endosymbiosis between two prokaryotes, giving them orders of magnitude more energy per gene; and (3) this endosymbiosis, in turn, produced a unique genomic asymmetry, transforming the selection pressures acting on eukaryotes and driving the evolution of unique eukaryotic traits.     

Principles of macromolecular organization and cell function in bacteria and archaea

Structural organization of the cytoplasm by compartmentation is a well established fact for the eukaryotic cell. In prokaryotes, compartmentation is less obvious. Most prokaryotes do not need intracytoplasmic membranes to maintain their vital functions. This review, especially dealing with prokaryotes, will point out that compartmentation in prokaryotes is present, but not only achieved by membranes. Besides membranes, the nucleoid, multienzyme complexes and metabolons, storage granules, and cytoskeletal elements are involved in compartmentation. In this respect, the organization of the cytoplasm of prokaryotes is similar to that in the eukaryotic cell. Compartmentation influences properties of water in cells.     

Microtubule Dynamics may Embody a Stationary Bipolarity Forming Mechanism Related to the Prokaryotic Division Site Mechanism (Pole-to-Pole Oscillations)

Cell division mechanisms in eukaryotes and prokaryotes have until recently been seen as being widely different. However, pole-to-pole oscillations of proteins like MinE in prokaryotes are now known to determine the division plane. These protein waves arise through spontaneous pattern forming reaction—diffusion mechanisms, based on cooperative binding of the proteins to a quasistationary matrix (like the cell membrane or DNA). Rather than waves, stationary bipolar pattern formation may arise as well. Some of the involved proteins have eukaryotic homologs (e.g. FtsZ and tubulin), pointing to a possible ancient shared mechanism. Tubulin polymerizes to microtubules in the spindle. Mitotic microtubules are in a highly dynamical state, frequently undergoing rapid shortening (catastrophe), and fragments formed from the microtubule ends are inferred to enhance the destabilization. Here, we show that cooperative binding of such fragments to microtubules may set up a similar pattern forming mechanism as seen in prokaryotes. The result is a spontaneously formed, well controllable, bipolar state of microtubule dynamics in the cell, which may contribute to defining the bipolar spindle.     

Cellular differentiation in the process of generation of the eukaryotic cell

Primitive atmosphere of the earth did not contain oxygen gas (O₂) when the proto-cells were generated successfully as the resut of chemical evolution and then evolved. Therefore, they first had acquired anaerobic energy metabolism, fermentation. The cellular metabolisms have often been formed by reorganizing to combine or recombinate between pre-existing metabolisms and newly born bioreactions. Photosynthetic metabolism in eukaryotic chloroplast consists of an electron-transfer photosystem and a fermentative reductive pentose phosphate cycle. On the other hand, O₂-respiration of eukaryotic mitochondrion is made of Embden-Meyerhof (EM) pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle, which originate from a connection of fermentative metabolisms, and an electron-transfer respiratory chain, which has been derived from the photosystem. These metabolisms already are completed in some evolved prokaryotes, for example the cyanobacteriumChlorogloea fritschii and aerobic photosynthetic bacteriaRhodospirillum rubrum andErythrobacter sp. Therefore, it can be reasonably presumed that the eukaryotic chloroplast and mitochondrion have once been formed as the result of metabolic (and genetic) differentiations in most evolved cyanobacterium. Symbiotic theory has explained the origin of eukaryotic cell as that in which the mitochondrion and chloroplast have been derived from endosymbionts of aerobic bacterium and cyanobacterium, respectively, and has mentioned as one of the most potent supportive evidences that amino acid sequences of the photosynthetic and O₂ -respiratory enzymes show similarities to corresponding prokaryotic enzymes. However, as will be shown in this discussion, many examples have shown currently that prokaryotic sequences of informative molecules are conserved well not only in those of the mitochondrial and chloroplast molecules but also in the nuclear molecules. In fact, the similarities in sequence of informative molecules are preserved well among the organisms not only in phylogenetically close relationships but also under highly selective pressure, that is under a physiological constraint for the species in their habitats. Therefore, the similarities in amino acid sequences of proteins between the prokaryotes and the organelles are not necessarily direct evidence for their phylogenetical closeness: it gives still less evidence for a symbiotic relationship between the prokaryotes and the organelles. The metabolic compartmentalization of the membranes is an important tendency in cellular evolution to guarantee high specificity and rate of the metabolisms. It is suggested from the data that the intracellular membranes are not static but undergo dynamic turnover. Furthermore, these facts strongly support the Membrane Evolution Theory which was proposed by one of the authors in 1975.     

Development of structural organization of protein-synthesizing machinery from prokaryotes to eukaryotes

Though the mechanisms of protein biosynthesis are similar in the cells of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the eukaryotic translational machinery in the cell is arranged more intricately. One of the most striking characteristic features of the eukaryotic translational machinery is that the eukaryotic proteins involved in the translational process, such as initiation factors, elongation factors and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, in contrast to their prokaryotic analogs, possess a non-specific affinity for RNA. Due to the RNA-binding ability, these eukaryotic proteins can be compartmentalized on polyribosomes. In addition to the proteins of the translational apparatus, several other eukaryotic RNA-binding proteins can be also compartmentalized on polyribosomes; these proteins include glycolytic enzymes, steroid hormone receptors and intermediate filament proteins. Thus, the eukaryotic polyribosome is an element of the cytoplasmic labile structure on which various proteins can be compartmentalized and, consequently, different biochemical pathways can be integrated.     

Characterization of the DNA from the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii and implications for nuclear organization.

Although dinoflagellates are eucaryotes, they possess many bacterial nuclear traits. For this reason they are thought by some to be evolutionary intermediates. Dinoflagellates also possess some unusual nuclear traits not seen in either bacteria or higher eucaryotes, such as a very large number of identical appearing, permanently condensed chromosomes suggesting polyteny or polyploidy. We have studied the DNA of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii with respect to DNA per cell, chromosome counts, and renaturation kinetics. The renaturation kinetic results tend to refute extreme polyteny and polyploidy as the mode of nuclear organization. This organism contains 55-60% repeated, interspersed DNA typical of higher eucaryotes. These results, along with the fact that dinoflagellate chromatin contains practically no basic protein, indicate that dinoflagellates may be organisms with a combination of both bacterial and eucaryotic traits.     

Adaptive Significance and Long-Term Survival of Asexual Lineages

Important questions remain about the long-term survival and adaptive significance of eukaryotic asexual lineages. Numerous papers dealing with sex advantages still continued to compare parthenogenetic populations versus sexual populations arguing that sex demonstrates a better fitness. Because asexual lineages do not possess any recombination mechanisms favoring rapid changes in the face of severe environmental conditions, they should be considered as an evolutionary dead-end. Nevertheless, reviewing literature dealing with asexual reproduction, it is possible to draw three stimulating conclusions. (1) Asexual reproduction in eukaryotes considerably differs from prokaryotes which experience recombination but neither meiosis nor syngamy. Recombination and meiosis would be a driving force for sexual reproduction. Eukaryotes should therefore be considered as a continuum of sexual organisms that are more or less capable (and sometimes incapable) of sexual reproduction. (2) Rather than revealing ancestral eukaryotic forms, most known lineages of asexual eukaryotes have lost sex due to a genomic conflict affecting their sexual capacity. Thus, it could be argued that hybridization is a major cause of their asexuality. Asexuality may have evolved as a reproductive mechanism reducing conflict within organisms. (3) It could be proposed that, rather than being generalists, parthenogenetic hybrid lineages could be favored when exploiting peculiar restricted ecological niches, following the “frozen niche variation” model. Although hybrid events may result in sex loss, probably caused by genomic conflict, asexual hybrids could display new original adaptive traits, and the rapid colonization of environments through clonal reproduction could favor their long-term survival, leading to evolutionary changes and hybrid speciation. Examination of the evolutionary history of asexual lineages reveals that evolutionary processes act through transitional stages in which even very small temporary benefits may be enough to counter the expected selective disadvantages.     

Binding preferential of chickpea cold shock protein during nucleic acid interactions

Cold shock proteins (CSPs) have a widespread occurrence from prokaryotes to eukaryotes including plants. These proteins are known to possess nucleic acid binding properties. CSPs have a single cold shock domain in prokaryotes while N-terminal and C-terminal flanking regions are present in eukaryotic CSPs. The objective of this study was to investigate nucleic acid binding preferential for the chickpea CSP. Full cDNA of chickpea CSP was cloned and sequenced. The sequence was submitted to GenBank (accession no. KM036036) at NCBI. Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis further revealed that the inferred amino acid sequence belongs to CSP family. Molecular docking was performed between the CSP and variety of nucleic acids entities. These results suggest that CSPs of chickpea possess preferential binding affinity for single stranded nucleic acids. Docking results suggest that homo-polymer entities of RNA polyU RNA (20mer) form most stable complex.     

Functional diversification of the RING finger and other binuclear treble clef domains in prokaryotes and the early evolution of the ubiquitin system

Recent studies point to a diverse assemblage of prokaryotic cognates of the eukaryotic ubiquitin (Ub) system. These systems span an entire spectrum, ranging from those catalyzing cofactor and amino acid biosynthesis, with only adenylating E1-like enzymes and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls), to those that are closer to eukaryotic systems by virtue of possessing E2 enzymes. Until recently E3 enzymes were unknown in such prokaryotic systems. Using contextual information from comparative genomics, we uncover a diverse group of RING finger E3s in prokaryotes that are likely to function with E1s, E2s, JAB domain peptidases and Ubls. These E1s, E2s and RING fingers suggest that features hitherto believed to be unique to eukaryotic versions of these proteins emerged progressively in such prokaryotic systems. These include the specific configuration of residues associated with oxyanion-hole formation in E2s and the C-terminal UFD in the E1 enzyme, which presents the E2 to its active site. Our study suggests for the first time that YukD-like Ubls might be conjugated by some of these systems in a manner similar to eukaryotic Ubls. We also show that prokaryotic RING fingers possess considerable functional diversity and that not all of them are involved in Ub-related functions. In eukaryotes, other than RING fingers, a number of distinct binuclear (chelating two Zn atoms) and mononuclear (chelating one zinc atom) treble clef domains are involved in Ub-related functions. Through detailed structural analysis we delineated the higher order relationships and interaction modes of binuclear treble clef domains. This indicated that the FYVE domain acquired the binuclear state independently of the other binuclear forms and that different treble clef domains have convergently acquired Ub-related functions independently of the RING finger. Among these, we uncover evidence for notable prokaryotic radiations of the ZF-UBP, B-box, AN1 and LIM clades of treble clef domains and present contextual evidence to support their role in functions unrelated to the Ub-system in prokaryotes. In particular, we show that bacterial ZF-UBP domains are part of a novel cyclic nucleotide-dependent redox signaling system, whereas prokaryotic B-box, AN1 and LIM domains have related functions as partners of diverse membrane-associated peptidases in processing proteins. This information, in conjunction with structural analysis, suggests that these treble clef domains might have been independently recruited to the eukaryotic Ub-system due to an ancient conserved mode of interaction with peptides.