Initial rate kinetic analysis of the mechanism of initiation complex formation and the role of initiation factor IF-3.

Initial rate kinetics of the formation of ternary complexes of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits, poly(uridylic acid), and N-acetylphenylalanyl transfer ribonucleic acid in the presence and in the absence of IF-3 are consistent with the hypothesis that the ternary complex is formed through a random order of addition of polynucleotide and aminoacyl-tRNA to separate and independent binding sites on the 30S ribosomes. The transformation of an intermediate into a stable ternary complex which probably entails a rearrangement of the ribosome structure leading to a codon-anticodon interaction represents the rate-limiting step in the formation of the ternary complex. The rate constant of this transformation, as well as the association constants for the formation of the 30S-poly(U) and 30S-N-AcPhe-tRNA binary complexes, are enhanced by the presence of IF-3 which acts as a kinetic effector on reactions which are intrinsic properties of the 30S ribosome. The IF-3-induced modification of these kinetic parameters of the 30S ribosomal subunit can per se explain the effect of IF-3 on protein synthesis without invoking a specific action at the level of the mRNA-ribosome interaction. This seems to be confirmed by the finding that IF-3 can stimulate several-fold the formation of a ternary complex even if one by-passes the ribosome-template binding step by starting with a covalent 30S-polynucleotide binary complex. Furthermore, the above-mentioned changes induced by IF-3 appear to be compatible with the previously proposed idea that the binding of the factor modifies the conformation of the 30S subunit. The random order of addition of substrates determined for the 30S-N-AcPhe-tRNA-poly(U) model system was found to be valid also for the more physiological 30S initiation complex containing poly(A,U.G) and (fMet-tRNA formed at low Mg2+ concentration in the presence of GTP and all three initiation factors.     

Function of initiation factor 1 in the binding and release of initiation factor 2 from ribosomal initiation complexes in Escherichia coli.

1. Studies on the function of initiation factor 1 (IF-1) in the formation of 30 S initiation complexes have been carried out. IF-1 appears to prevent the dissociation of initiation factor 2 (IF-2) from the 30 S initiation complex. The factor has no effect on either the initial binding of IF-2 nor does it increase the amount of IF-2 dependent fMet-tRNA and GTP bound to the 30 S subunit. Bound fMet-tRNA remains stable to sucrose gradient centrifugation even in the absence of IF-1. 2. It is postulated that the presence of IF-2 on the 30 S complex is necessary so that at the time of junction with the 50 S subunit to form a 70 S complex, the 70 S-dependent GTPase activity of IF-2 can hydrolyze GTP. This hydrolysis provides a means by which GTP can be removed to facilitate formation of a 70 S initiation complex active in peptidyl transfer. In support of this postulate, it was observed that 30 S initiation complexes formed in the absence of IF-1 could be depleted of their complexes were still able to accept 50 S subunits to form 70 S complexes which could still donate fMet-tRNA into peptide linkages. These results indicate that 30 S complexes lacking GTP do not require IF-2 for formation of active 70 S complexes. 3. IF-1, which is required to prevent dissociation of IF-2 from the 30 S initiation complex, is also required for release of IF-2 from ribosomes following 70 S initiation complex formation. The mechanisms of the release of IF-2 has been studied in greater detail. Evidence is presented which rules out the presence of a stable IF-2 GDP complex on the surface of the 70 S ribosome following GTP hydrolysis and of any exchange reactions between IF-1 and guanine nucleotides necessary for effecting the release of IF-2. IF-2 remains on the 70 S initiation complexes after release of guanine nucleotides and can be liberated solely by addition of IF-1.     

Release and recycling of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 in the formation of an 80 S ribosomal polypeptide chain initiation complex.

The eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-5 mediates hydrolysis of GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex in the absence of 60 S ribosomal subunits. The eIF-2.GDP formed under these conditions is released from the 40 S ribosomal subunit while initiator Met-tRNA(f) remains bound. The released eIF-2.GDP can participate in an eIF-2B-catalyzed GDP/GTP exchange reaction to reform the Met-tRNA(f).eIF-2.GTP ternary complex. In contrast, when 60 S ribosomal subunits were also present in an eIF-5-catalyzed reaction, the eIF-2.GDP produced remained bound to the 60 S ribosomal subunit of the 80 S initiation complex. When such an 80 S initiation complex, containing bound eIF-2.GDP, was incubated with GTP and eIF-2B, GDP was released. However, eIF-2 still remained bound to the ribosomes and was unable to form a Met-tRNA(f)l.eIF-2.GTP ternary complex. In contrast, when 60 S ribosomal subunits were preincubated with either free eIF-2 or with eIF-2.eIF-2B complex and then added to a reaction containing both the 40 S initiation complex and eIF-5, the eIF-2.GDP produced did not bind to the 60 S ribosomal subunits but was released from the ribosomes. Thus, the 80 S initiation complex formed under these conditions did not contain bound eIF-2.GDP. Under similar experimental conditions, preincubation of 60 S ribosomal subunits with purified eIF-2B (free of eIF-2) failed to cause release of eIF-2.GDP from the ribosomal initiation complex. These results suggest that 60 S ribosome-bound eIF-2.GDP does not act as a direct substrate for eIF-2B-mediated release of eIF-2 from ribosomes. Rather, the affinity of 60 S ribosomal subunits for either eIF-2, or the eIF-2 moiety of the eIF-2.eIF-2B complex, prevents association of 60 S ribosomal subunits with eIF-2.GDP formed in the initiation reaction. This ensures release of eIF-2 from ribosomes following hydrolysis of GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex.     

Specific binding of Excherichia coli chain Initiation factor 2 to fMet-tRnafMet.

A stable Escherichia coli IF-2-fMet-tRNAfMet complex is formed upon incubation of IF-2 (prokaryotic initiation factor) with fMet-tRNAfMet is the presence of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 100 mM NH4Cl, and 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The complex thus formed is retained on a Millipore filter and is assayed accordingly. Complex formation does dot require GTP, is unstable in the presence of 5 mM Mg2+, and is specific for fMet-tRNAfMet. Other amino acyl-tRNAs or deacylated tRNAs do not form such a complex with IF-2. A crude ribosomal high salt wash preparation contains other protein factors which bind unspecifically to RNAs under the above binding conditions. One of these factors elute similarly to IF-1 on DEAE-cellulose chromatography. Extensively purified IF-1 and IF-3 show weak and unspecific RNA-binding activities. The RNA-protein complex formed in each of the above cases, like the IF-2-fMet-tRNAfMet complex, is retained on Millipore filter and is sensitive to Mg2+.     

Binding and release of radiolabeled eukaryotic initiation factors 2 and 3 during 80 S initiation complex formation.

The AUG-dependent formation of an 80 S ribosomal initiation complex was studied using purified rabbit reticulocyte initiation factors radiolabeled by reductive methylation. The radiolabeled initiation factors were as biologically active as untreated factors. Reaction mixtures containing a variety of components (AUG, GTP, Met-tRNAf, initiation factors, and 40 S and 60 S ribosomal subunits) were incubated at 30 degrees C and then analyzed on linear sucrose gradients for the formation of ribosomal complexes. The results show that both eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-3 and the ternary complex (eIF-2.GTP.Met-tRNAf) bind independently to the 40 S subunit and each of these components enhances the binding of the other. All of the polypeptides of eIF-2 and eIF-3 participate in this binding. Formation of an 80 S ribosomal complex requires eIF-5 and 60 S subunits in a reaction that is stimulated by eIF-4C. Both eIF-2 and eIF-3 are released from the 40 S preinitiation complex during formation of the 80 S initiation complex. Release of eIF-2 and eIF-3 does not occur and 80 S ribosomal complexes are not formed if GTP is replaced by a nonhydrolyzable analog such as guanosine 5'-O3-(1,2-mu-imido)triphosphate. Despite a variety of attempts, it has not yet been possible to demonstrate binding of eIF-4C, eIF-4D, or eIF-5 to either 40 S or 80 S ribosomal complexes.     

The involvement of a complex between formylmethionyl-tRNA and initiation factor IF-2 in prokaryotic initiation.

A complex between initiation factor IF-2 and fMet-tRNA can be formed under ionic conditions, which are optimal for initiation complex formation. The complex can be retained on cellulose nitrate filters after fixing with glutaraldehyde. The IF-2 - FMet-tRNA complex formation is not influenced by GTP and GDP. Other nucleoside di of triphosphates also have no effect. Evidence is presented that this complex acts as an intermediate in polypeptide chain initiation. The IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex formation is not influenced by initiation factors IF-1 and IF-3. The binary complex can be bound to the 30-S subunit in the absence of GTP, which indicates that there is no concomittant binding of the IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex and the nucleotide moiety to the 30-S subunit. The binding of the binary complex is stimulated by GTP. The influence of some inhibitors of initiation on the IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex formation has been tested. Aurin tricarboxylic acid appeared to be a strong inhibitor, whereas the sulfhydryl reagents N-ethylmaleimide and p-chloromercuribenzoate had no effect.     

Function of eukaryotic initiation factor 5 in the formation of an 80 S ribosomal polypeptide chain initiation complex.

Eukaryotic initiation factor 5 (eIF-5), isolated from rabbit reticulocyte lysates, is a monomeric protein of 58-62 kDa. The function of eIF-5 in the formation of an 80 S polypeptide chain initiation complex from a 40 S initiation complex has been investigated. Incubation of the isolated 40 S initiation complex (40 S.AUG.Met.tRNAf.eIF-2 GTP) with eIF-5 resulted in the rapid and quantitative hydrolysis of GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex. The rate of this reaction was unaffected by the presence of 60 S ribosomal subunits. Analysis of eIF-5-catalyzed reaction products by gel filtration indicated that both eIF-2.GDP binary complex and Pi formed were released from the ribosomal complex whereas Met-tRNAf remained bound to 40 S ribosomes as a Met-tRNAf.40 S.AUG complex. Reactions carried out with biologically active 32P-labeled eIF-5 indicated that this protein was not associated with the 40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf complex; similar results were obtained by immunological methods using monospecific anti-eIF-5 antibodies. The isolated 40 S.AUG.Met-RNAf complex, free of eIF-2.GDP binary complex and eIF-5, readily interacted with 60 S ribosomal subunits in the absence of exogenously added eIF-5 to form the 80 S initiation complex capable of transferring Met-tRNAf into peptide linkages. These results indicate that the sole function of eIF-5 in the initiation of protein synthesis is to mediate hydrolysis of GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex in the absence of 60 S ribosomal subunits. This leads to formation of the intermediate 40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf and dissociation of the eIF-2.GDP binary complex. Subsequent joining of 60 S ribosomal subunits to the intermediate 40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf complex does not require participation of eIF-5. Thus, the formation of an 80 S ribosomal polypeptide chain initiation complex from a 40 S ribosomal initiation complex can be summarized by the following sequence of partial reactions. (40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf.eIF-2.GTP) eIF-5----(40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf) + (eIF-2.GDP) + Pi (1) (40 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf) + 60 S----(80 S.AUG.Met-tRNAf) (2) 80 S initiation complex.     

Preparation and properties of a Met-tRNAf binding factor from rat liver and rat hepatoma.

A Met-tRNAf binding factor (IF-2) from the microsomal fraction of rat liver and rat hepatoma ascites cells was partially purified by ammonium sulphate fractionation, DEAE-cellulose and phosphocellulose chromatography. The factor binds [3H]Met-tRNAf only in the presence of either GTP or GMPPCP. Maximal binding takes place at 37 degrees C and in the absence of Mg++. The factor is specific for Met-tRNAf and does not bind Phe-tRNA from rat liver or from E. coli. The ternary complex [Met-tRNAf . IF-2 . GTP1 binds to 40 S ribosomal subunits from rat liver in the absence of mRNA or poly(A, G, U) without GTP hydrolysis. GDP as well as aurintricarboxylic acid inhibit the ternary complex formation. Both factors are rapidly inactivated by N-ethylmaleimide treatment and by preincubation at 45 degrees C. Heat inactivation is partially prevented by GTP and GDP. With regard to the functional properties there are no significant differences between IF-2 from normal liver and hepatoma cells. On the other hand heat denaturation compared to the rat liver factor, which may be due to differences in contaminating proteins.     

Late events of translation initiation in bacteria: a kinetic analysis

Binding of the 50S ribosomal subunit to the 30S initiation complex and the subsequent transition from the initiation to the elongation phase up to the synthesis of the first peptide bond represent crucial steps in the translation pathway. The reactions that characterize these transitions were analyzed by quench-flow and fluorescence stopped-flow kinetic techniques. IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis was fast (30/s) followed by slow P(i) release from the complex (1.5/s). The latter step was rate limiting for subsequent A-site binding of EF-Tu small middle dotGTP small middle dotPhe-tRNA(Phe) ternary complex. Most of the elemental rate constants of A-site binding were similar to those measured on poly(U), with the notable exception of the formation of the first peptide bond which occurred at a rate of 0.2/s. Omission of GTP or its replacement with GDP had no effect, indicating that neither the adjustment of fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the P site nor the release of IF2 from the ribosome required GTP hydrolysis.     

Structure-function relationship in Escherichia coli initiation factors. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the interaction between IF-2 and guanosine nucleotides

Equilibrium dialysis and protection from heat inactivation and proteolysis show that initiation factor 2 (IF-2) interacts not only with GTP but also with GDP and that its conformation is changed upon binding of either nucleotide. The apparent Ka (at 25 degrees C) for the IF-2 X GDP and IF-2 X GTP complexes was 8.0 X 10(4) and 7.0 X 10(3) M(-1), respectively. The lower affinity for GTP is associated with a more negative delta S0. The interaction, monitored by 1HNMR spectroscopy, is characterized by fast exchange and results in line broadening and downfield shift of the purine C-8 and ribose C-1' protons of GTP as well as of the beta, gamma-methylene protons of (beta-gamma-methylene)guanosine 5'-triphosphate. The interaction of guanosine nucleotides with IF-2 requires an H bond donor (or acceptor) group at position C-2 of the purine and involves the beta- and/or gamma-phosphate of the nucleotide while the ribose 2'-OH group or the integrity of the furan ring are less critical. IF-2 binds to ribosomal particles with decreasing affinity: 30 S greater than 70 S greater than 50 S. GTP and GDP have no effect on the binding to 70 S. GTP stimulates the binding to the 30 S and depresses somewhat the binding to the 50 S subunits; GDP has the opposite effect. These results seem to rule out that the release of IF 2 from 70 S is due to a "GDP-conformation" of the factor incompatible with its permanence on the ribosome. The rate and the extent of 30 S initiation complex formation are approximately 2-fold higher with IF-2 X GTP than with IF-2 alone. At low concentrations of IF-2 and 30 S subunits, GDP inhibits this reaction, acting as a strong competitive inhibitor of GTP (Ki = 1.25 X 10(-5)m) and preventing IF-2 from binding to the ribosomal subunit.     

Preparation and characterization of eukaryotic initiation factor EIF-3. Formation of binary (EIF-3-Met-tRNAf) and ternary (EIF-3-Met-tRNAf-GTP) complexes.

The 133,000 X g supernatant fraction prepared from ascites cells in 20 mM KCl (low CKl supernatant) contained the initiation factors EIF-1 and EIF-2 (and the elongation factore EF-1 and EF-2) but lacked EIF-3; thus, low KCl supernatant could be used to assay for EIF-3. EIF-3 was prepared from a crude initiation factor perparation (a 250 mM KCl extract of ascites cell ribosomes precipitated with 70% saturated ammonium sulfate) by chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex A-50 and hydroxylapatite. The EIF-O had no detectable EIF-1 and little or no EIF-2. Factor EIF-3 was required fro translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA. The molecular weight of EIF-3 was estimated by Sephadex G-200 filtration to be 139,000; the sedimentation coefficient was calculated to be about 5.8. EIF-3 formed a binary complex specifically with the initiator tRNA, Met-tRNAf, and if GTP was present the factor formed a ternary complex (EIF-3-Met-tRNAf-GTP). The EIF-3 preparation had no methionyl-tRNA synthetase activity to account for binding. Complex-formation was with eukaryotic Met-tRNAf and no other aminoacyl-tRNA. The binary and ternary complexes were retained quantitatively on Millipore filters (which was the most convenient assay), but they could also be demonstrated by filtration through Sephadex G-100 or by glycerol gradient centrifugation. GTP increased the rate, the amount, and the stability of complex formed; the ration of GTP to Met-tRNAf in the ternary complex appeared to be 1. The binary and the ternary complexes transferred Met-tRNAf to the 40 S ribosomal subunits, but not to 60 S subparticles. The factor-dependent binding of Met-tRNAf to the 40 S subunit did not require mRNA (or GTP). In the presence of 60 S subunits, the initiator tRNA bound to 40 S subunits was not transferred to 80 S ribosomes even if mRNA was added--that reaction may require another initiation factor. Treatment of EIF-3 with N-ethylmaleimide led to loss of its activity in complex formation and in support of the translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA. In addition to forming the binary and ternary complexes, and supporting the translation of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA, EIF-3 also increases the number of free ribosomal subunits by either preventing their association or causing dissociation of 80 S couples.     

Distinct functions of eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1A and eIF3 in the formation of the 40 S ribosomal preinitiation complex.

We have used an in vitro translation initiation assay to investigate the requirements for the efficient transfer of Met-tRNAf (as Met-tRNAf.eIF2.GTP ternary complex) to 40 S ribosomal subunits in the absence of mRNA (or an AUG codon) to form the 40 S preinitiation complex. We observed that the 17-kDa initiation factor eIF1A is necessary and sufficient to mediate nearly quantitative transfer of Met-tRNAf to isolated 40 S ribosomal subunits. However, the addition of 60 S ribosomal subunits to the 40 S preinitiation complex formed under these conditions disrupted the 40 S complex resulting in dissociation of Met-tRNAf from the 40 S subunit. When the eIF1A-dependent preinitiation reaction was carried out with 40 S ribosomal subunits that had been preincubated with eIF3, the 40 S preinitiation complex formed included bound eIF3 (40 S.eIF3. Met-tRNAf.eIF2.GTP). In contrast to the complex lacking eIF3, this complex was not disrupted by the addition of 60 S ribosomal subunits. These results suggest that in vivo, both eIF1A and eIF3 are required to form a stable 40 S preinitiation complex, eIF1A catalyzing the transfer of Met-tRNAf.eIF2.GTP to 40 S subunits, and eIF3 stabilizing the resulting complex and preventing its disruption by 60 S ribosomal subunits.     

Consequences of a specific cleavage in situ of 16-S ribosomal RNA for polypeptide chain initiation.

The effect of bacteriocin (cloacin DF13) treatment of Escherichia coli ribosomes on initiation of protein synthesis has been studied in detail. In agreement with our previous findings [Baan et al. (1976) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 702--706] it is shown that 70-S initiation complexes can be formed with cloacin-treated ribosomes, but that the initiation factor IF-1 does not function properly. The following pleiotropic effects of this factor have been studied: (a) the acceleration of ribosomal subunit exchange with 70-S couples; (b) the stimulation of the IF-3-mediated dissociation of 70-S ribosomes; (c) the stimulation of 30-S initiation complex formation; (d) the enhancement of the rate of release of IF-2 from 70-S initiation complexes. The effects (a) and (b) are virtually abolished after cleavage of 16-S rRNA. The effect (d) is only partially reduced whereas effect (c) seems to be unimpaired. It is concluded that 70-S initiation complex formation with cloacin-treated ribosomes suffers from improper functioning of IF-1 in the generation of active subunits from 70-S tight couples. This is the only effect on initiation. It can be compensated for by adding more IF-3. The data provide functional evidence that 16-S rRNA is involved in ribosomal subunit interaction.     

Effect of polypeptide initiation factors on the spermidine stimulation of initiation complex formation

The AUG- and MS2 RNA-dependent fMet-tRNA binding to 30S ribosomal subunits was stimulated by spermidine with any individual or combination of initiation factors capable of participating in the formation of an initiation complex. When 70S ribosomes were used instead of 30S ribosomal subunits, IF-3 was necessary for spermidine stimulation of the complex formation.     

Initiation of protein synthesis in animal mitochondria. Purification and characterization of translational initiation factor 2

Bovine liver mitochondrial translational initiation factor 2 (IF-2mt) has been purified to near homogeneity. The scheme developed results in a 24,000-fold purification of the factor with about 26% recovery of activity. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicates that IF-2mt has a subunit molecular mass of 85 kDa. IF-2mt promotes the binding of formyl(f)Met-tRNA to mitochondrial ribosomes but is inactive with the nonformylated derivative. IF-2mt is active on chloroplast 30 S ribosomal subunits, but IF-2chl has no activity in promoting fMet-tRNA binding to animal mitochondrial ribosomes. IF-2mt is sensitive to elevated temperatures and is inactivated by treatment with N-ethylmaleimide. It is partially protected from heat and N-ethylmaleimide inactivation by the presence of either GTP or GDP suggesting that guanine nucleotides may bind to this factor directly. The binding of fMet-tRNA to mitochondrial ribosomes requires the presence of GTP and is inhibited by GDP. DeoxyGTP is very effective in replacing GTP in promoting fMet-tRNA binding to ribosomes and some activity is also observed with ITP. No activity is observed with ATP, CTP, or UTP. Nonhydrolyzable analogs of GTP can promote formation of both 28 S and 55 S initiation complexes indicating that GTP hydrolysis is not required for subunit joining in the animal mitochondrial system.     

Affinity modification of Escherichia coli ribosomes with 2',3'-O-[4-(N-2-chloroethyl)-N-methylamino]-benzylidene derivative of AUGU3 in the 70S initiation complexes

Affinity labelling of the Escherichia coli ribosomes with the 2',3'-O-[4-(N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-methylamino]benzylidene derivative of AUGU3(AUGU3[14C]CHRCl) has been studied within 70S initiation complexes ribosome.AUGU3[14C]CHRCl.fMet-tRNA(Metf) and binary complex ribosome.AUGU3[14C]CHRCl. Various ways of the 70S initiation complex formation resulted in differently labelled products. Proteins S5, S7, S9, L1, L16 were thus identified as cross-linked with AUGU3[14C]CHRCl within an initiation complex obtained in the presence of initiation factors IF-1, IF-2, IF-3, whereas only proteins S5 and S7 were cross-linked within the complex obtained with the sole factor IF-2. Proteins S1, S3, L1 and L33 were labelled within the initiation complex obtained nonenzymatically but only protein S1 within the binary complex. In all complexes formed with use of initiation factors labelling of IF-2 factor was invariably observed.     

Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system

To provide a bridge between in vivo and in vitro studies of eukaryotic translation initiation, we have developed a reconstituted translation initiation system using components from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have purified a minimal set of initiation factors (elFs) that, together with yeast 80S ribosomes, GTP, and initiator methionyl-tRNA, are sufficient to assemble active initiation complexes on a minimal mRNA template. The kinetics of various steps in the pathway of initiation complex assembly and the formation of the first peptide bond in vitro have been explored. The formation of active initiation complexes in this system is dependent on ribosomes, mRNA, Met-tRNAi, GTP hydrolysis, elF1, elF1A, elF2, elF5, and elF5B. Our data indicate that elF1 and elF1A both facilitate the binding of the elF2 x GTP x Met-tRNAi complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit to form the 43S complex. elF5 stimulates a step after 43S complex formation, consistent with its proposed role in activating GTP hydrolysis by elF2 upon initiation codon recognition. The presence of elF5B is required for the joining of the 40S and 60S subunits to form the 80S initiation complex. The step at which each of these factors acts in this reconstituted system is in agreement with previous data from in vivo studies and work using reconstituted mammalian systems, indicating that the system recapitulates fundamental events in translation initiation in eukaryotic cells. This system should allow us to couple powerful yeast genetic and molecular biological experiments with in vitro kinetic and biophysical experiments, yielding a better understanding of the molecular mechanics of this central, complex process.     

Activity of Euglena gracilis chloroplast ribosomes with procaryotic and eucaryotic initiation factors

A method that permits the preparation of Euglena gracilis chloroplast 30 S ribosomal subunits that are largely free of endogenous initiation factors and that are active in the binding of fMet-tRNA in response to poly(A, U, G), has been developed. These 30 S subunits have been tested for activity in initiation complex formation with initiation factors from both procaryotes and eucaryotes. We have observed that Escherichia coli IF-2 binds fMet-tRNA nearly as well to Euglena chloroplast ribosomal subunits as it does to its homologous subunits. Neither wheat germ eIF-2 nor Euglena eIF-2A can bind fMet-tRNA efficiently to Euglena chloroplast or E. coli 30 S subunits although both are active with wheat germ 40 S ribosomal subunits. Euglena chloroplast 68 S ribosomes will also bind the initiator tRNA. Both E. coli IF-2 and E. coli IF-3 stimulate this reaction on chloroplast ribosomes with approximately the same efficiency as they do on their homologous ribosomes. E. coli IF-1 enhances the binding of fMet-tRNA to the chloroplast 68 S ribosomes when either IF-2 or IF-3 is limiting. The chloroplast ribosomes unlike E. coli ribosomes show considerable activity over a broad range of Mg2+ ion concentrations.     

Formation and release of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 X GDP complex during eukaryotic ribosomal polypeptide chain initiation complex formation

The formation and release of an eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-2 X GDP binary complex during eIF-5-mediated assembly of an 80 S ribosomal polypeptide chain initiation complex have been studied by sucrose gradient centrifugation analysis. Isolated 40 S initiation complex reacts with eIF-5 and 60 S ribosomal subunits to form an 80 S ribosomal initiation complex with concomitant hydrolysis of an equimolar amount of bound GTP to GDP and Pi. Sucrose gradient analysis of reaction products revealed that GDP was released from ribosomes as an eIF-2 X GDP complex. Evidence is presented that eIF-5-mediated hydrolysis releases the GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex as an intact eIF-2 X GDP complex rather than as free GDP and eIF-2 which subsequently recombine to form the binary complex. Furthermore, formation and release of eIF-2 X GDP from the ribosomal complex do not require concomitant formation of an 80 S initiation complex since both reactions occur efficiently when the 40 S initiation complex reacts with eIF-5 in the absence of 60 S ribosomal subunits. These results, along with the observation that the 40 S initiation complex formed with the nonhydrolyzable analogue of GTP, 5'-guanylylmethylene diphosphonate, can neither join a 60 S ribosomal subunit nor releases ribosome-bound eIF-2, suggest that following eIF-5-mediated hydrolysis of GTP bound to the 40 S initiation complex, both Pi and eIF-2 X GDP complex are released from ribosomes prior to the joining of 60 S ribosomal subunits to the 40 S initiation complex.