The reduction of xylose to xylitol by Candida guilliermondii and Candida parapsilosis: Incidence of oxygen and pH

Summary The ability of C. guilliermondii and C. parapsilosis to ferment xylose to xylitol was evaluated under different oxygen transfer rates in order to enhance the xylitol yield. In C. guilliermondii, a maximal xylitol yield of 0.66 g/g was obtained when oxygen transfer rate was 2.2 mmol/l.h. Optimal conditions to produce xylitol by C. parapsilosis (0.75 g/g) arose from cultures at pH 4.75 with 0.4 mmoles of oxygen/l.h. The response of the yeasts to anaerobic conditions has shown that oxygen was required for xylose metabolism.Nomenclature max maximum specific growth rate (per hour) - qSmax maximum specific rate of xylose consumption (g xylose per g dry biomass per hour) - qpmax maximum specific productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per g dry biomass per hour) - Qp average volumetric productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per liter per hour) - Y_P/S xylitol yield (g xylitol per g substrate utilized) - Y_P'/S glycerol yield (g glycerol per g substrate utilized) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized)     

Effect of xylitol on the metabolism and viability of Candida shehatae

Anaerobic D-xylose fermentations were performed with C. shehatate in the presence of 0, 25, and 50 g/L of xylitol. D-Xylose was preferentially utilized over xylitol and ethanol yields (Y _Etoh/S 0.26 g/g) were unaffected by xylitol. Added xylitol did inhibit conversion of xylose to xylitol at an external xylitol concentration of 50 g/L; Y _Xylitol/S was reduced from 0.21 to 0.14. Cell viability declined in all of the fermentations, but was not due to the presence of xylitol. The decline in viability was attributed to oxygen deprivation, since ethanol levels only reached 10.5 g/L and the decline cell viability was the same in each fermentation, regardless of the xylitol concentration.     

Fermentation ofd-xylose,d-glucose andl-arabinose mixture byPichia stipitis Y 7124: sugar tolerance

Summary The effect of substrate concentration (S ₀) on the fermentation parameters of a sugar mixture byPichia stipitis Y 7124 was investigated under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions. Under microaerobiosisP. stipitis maintained high ethanol yield and productivity when initial substrate concentration did not exceed 150 g/l; ethanol yield of about 0.40 g/g and volumetric productivity up to 0.39 g/l per hour were obtained. Optimal specific ethanol productivity (0.2 g/g per hour) was observed withS ₀=110 g/l. Under anaerobic conditionsP. stipitis exhibited the highest fermentative performances atS ₀=20 g/l; it produced ethanol with a yield of 0.42 g/g, with a specific rate of 1.1 g/g per day. When the initial substrate level increased, specific ethanol productivity declined gradually and ethanol yield was dependent on the degree of utilization of each sugar in the mixture.Abbreviations E _m maximum produced ethanol (g/l) - E ₀ initial ethanol (g/l) - E _v evaporated ethanol (g/l) - Q _p volumetric productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/l per hour or g/l per day) - q _p specific productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/g cells per hour) - q _pm maximum specific productivity of ethanol (g/l per hour) - S ₀ initial substrate concentration (g/l) - t _f time at which produced ethanol is maximum (h) - Y _p/s ethanol yield (g ethanol produced/g substrate utilized) - Y _x/s cell yeild (g cells produced/g substrate utilized) - Y _xo/xy xylitol yield (g xylitol produced/g xylose utilized) - probability coefficient - specific growth rate coefficient (h^-1 or d^-1)     

Xylitol formation by Candida boidinii in oxygen limited chemostat culture

Summary Production of xylitol by Candida boidinii NRRL Y-17213 occurs under conditions of an oxygen limitation. The extent to which substrate is converted to xylitol and its coproducts (ethanol, other polyols, acetic acid), and the relative flow rates of substrate to energetic and biosynthetic pathways is controlled by the degree of oxygen limitation.With decrease in oxygen concentration in the inlet gas, for a constant dilution rate of 0.05 1/h. the specific oxygen uptake rate decreased from 1.30 to 0.36 mmol/gh Xylitol was not produced at specific oxygen uptake rates above 0.91 mmol/gh. Upon shift to lower oxygen rates, specific xylitol production rate increased more rapidly than specific ethanol production rate:Nomenclature D dilution rate (1/h) - DOT dissolved oxygen tension (%) - m_o2 maintenance coefficient (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_o2 specific oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_s specific xylose uptake rate (g xylose/g cell mass h) or (mmol xylose/g cell mass h) - q_x specific xylitol production rate (g xylitol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol xylitol/ g cell mass h) - q_e specific ethanol production rate (g ethanol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol ethanol/ g cell mass h) - q_CO2 specific carbon dioxide production rate (mmol CO₂/g cell mass h) - S xylose concentration (g/1) - Y_cm/s cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol xylose) or (g cell mass/ g xylose consumed) - Y_cm/O2 cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol O₂) - Y_X/S xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/g xylose consumed) - Y_x/O2 xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/mmol O₂) - Y_e/s ethanol yield coefficient (g ethanol/g xylose consumed) - OUR oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/1h) - specific growth rate (1/h)     

The effect of pH on kinetic and yield parameters during the ethanolic fermentation of D-xylose with Pachysolen tannophilus

We have studied the ethanolic fermentation of D-xylose with Pachysolen tannophilus in batch cultures. We propose a model to predict variations in D-xylose consumed, and biomass and ethanol produced, in which we include parameters for the specific growth rate, for the consumption of D-xylose and production of ethanol either related or not to growth.The ideal initial pH for ethanol production turned out to be 4.5. At this pH value the net specific growth rate was 0.26 h^–1, biomass yield was 0.16 g.g^–1, the cell-maintenance coefficient was 0.073 g.g^–1.h^–1, the parameter for ethanol production non-related to growth was 0.064 g.g^–1,h^–1 and the maximum ethanol yield was 0.32 g.g^–1.List of Symbols A _c Carbon atomic weight - a _d1/h Specific cell-maintenance rate defined in Eq. (8) - c Mass fraction of carbon in the biomass - E g/l Ethanol concentration - f _x Correction factor defined in Eq. (13) - f _x Correction factor defined in Eq. (13) - f _xi Correction factor defined in Eq. (14) - k _d1/h Death constant - M _E Ethanol molecular weight - M _s Xylose molecular weight - M _xi Xylitol molecular weight - m g xylose/g biomass Maintenance coefficient for substrate - m _dg xylose/g biomass Maintenance coefficient when k _d - q _Eg ethanol/g biomass. Specific ethanol production rate - s g/l Residual xylose concentration - s ₀ g/l Initial xylose concentration - t h Time - x g/l Biomass concentration - x ₀ g/l Initial biomass concentration - Y _E/sg ethanol/g xylose Instantaneous ethanol yield - ¯Y _E/sg ethanol/g xylose Mean ethanol yield - Y _E ^s/T g ethanol/g xylose Theoretical ethanol yield - Y _E ^s/* g ethanol/g xylose Corrected instantaneous ethanol yield - ¯Y _E ^s/* g ethanol/g xylose Corrected mean ethanol yield - Y _x/sg biomass/g xylose Biomass yield - ¯Y _xi/sg xylitol/g xylose Mean xylitol yield Greek Letters g ethanol/g biomass Growth-associated product formation parameter - g ethanol/g biomass.h Non-growth-associated product formation parameter - _dg ethanol/g biomass.h Non-growth-associated product formation parameter when k _d0 - h Variable defined in Eq. (6) or Eq. (7) - 1/h Specific growth rate - _m1/h Maximum specific growth rate     

Batch xylitol production by<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Candida guilliermondii</Emphasis> FTI 20037 from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolyzate at controlled pH values

Batch fermentation of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolyzate by the yeast Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037 was performed using controlled pH values (3.5, 5.5, 7.5). The maximum values of xylitol volumetric productivity (Q _p=0.76 g/l h) and xylose volumetric consumption (Q _s=1.19 g/l h) were attained at pH 5.5. At pH 3.5 and 7.5 the Q _p value decreased by 66 and 72%, respectively. Independently of the pH value, Y _x/s decreased with the increase in Y _p/s suggesting that the xylitol bioconversion improves when the cellular growth is limited. At the highest pH value (7.5), the maximum specific xylitol production value was the lowest (q _pmax=0.085 g/l h.), indicating that the xylose metabolism of the yeast was diverted from xylitol formation to cell growth.List of symbols P _max xylitol concentration (g/l) - Q _x volumetric cell production rate (g/l h) - Q _s volumetric xylose uptake rate (g/l h) - Q _p volumetric xylitol production rate (g/l h) - q _pmax specific xylitol production (g/g h) - q _smax specific xylose uptake rate (g/g h) - _max specific cell growth rate (h^–1) - Y _p/s xylitol yield coefficient, g xylitol per g xylose consumed (g/g) - Y _p/x xylitol yield coefficient, g xylitol per g dry cell mass produced (g/g) - Y _x/s cell yield coefficient, g dry cell mass per g xylose consumed (g/g) - _cell percentage of the cell yield from the theoretical value (%) - _xylitol percentage of xylitol yield from the theoretical value (%)     

Ethanol fermentation using a fructose-negative mutant of Zymomonas mobilis

Summary The fermentation of an equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose into ethanol and sorbitol by a fructose negative mutant of Zymomonas mobilis is analysed using a recently described methodology (Ait-Abdelkader and Baratti, Biotechnol. Tech. 1993,329–334) based on polynomial fitting and calculation of instantaneous and overall parameters. These parameters are utilized to describe this mixed-substrate mixed-product fermentation.Nomenclature X biomass concentration, g/l - S total sugar concentration, g/l - Glu glucose concentration, g/l - Fru fructose concentration, g/l - Sor sorbitol concentration, g/l - P ethanol concentration, g/l - t fermentation time, h - specific growth rate, h^-1 - q_s specific sugar uptake rate, g/g.h - q_g specific glucose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_F specific fructose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_P specific ethanol productivity, g/g.h - q_Sor specific sorbitol productivity, g/g.h - Y_X/S biomass yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_P/S ethanol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/S sorbitol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/F sorbitol yield on fructose, (g/g) - Y_P/G ethanol yield on glucose, (g/g)     

The fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis

Summary The fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis of xylitol and the various sugars which are liberated upon hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass was investigated. Both yeasts produced ethanol from d-glucose, d-mannose, d-galactose and d-xylose. Only P. stipitis fermented d-cellobiose, producing 6.5 g·l^-1 ethanol from 20 g·l^-1 cellobiose within 48 h. No ethanol was produced from l-arabinose, l-rhamnose or xylitol. Diauxie was evident during the fermentation of a sugar mixture. Following the depletion of glucose, P. stipitis fermented galactose, mannose, xylose and cellobiose simultaneously with no noticeable preceding lag period. A similar fermentation pattern was observed with C. shehatae, except that it failed to utilize cellobiose even though it grew on cellobiose when supplied as the sole sugar. P. stipitis produced considerably more ethanol from the sugar mixture than C. shehatae, primarily due to its ability to ferment cellobiose. In general P. stipitis exhibited a higher volumetric rate and yield of ethanol production. This yeast fermented glucose 30–50% more rapidly than xylose, whereas the rates of ethanol production from these two sugars by C. shehatae were similar. P. stipitis had no absolute vitamin requirement for xylose fermentation, but biotin and thiamine enhanced the rate and yield of ethanol production significantly.Nomenclature _max Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - Q _p Maximum volumetric rate of ethanol production, calculated from the slope of the ethanol vs. time curve, g·(l·h)^-1 - q _p Maximum specific rate of ethanol production, g·(g cells·h) - Y _p/s Ethanol yield coefficient, g ethanol·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - Y _x/s Cell yield coefficient, g biomass·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - E Efficiency of substrate utilization, g substrate consumed·(g initial substrate)^-1·100     

Ethanol fermentation using a glucose negative mutant ofZymomonas mobilis

Summary The fermentation of an equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose into ethanol and sorbitol by a glucose negative mutant ofZymomonas mobilis was monitored. The results were analyzed using a recently described method based on polynomial fitting and calculation of intantaneous and overall parameters. These parameters described well the physiology of this mixed-substrate mixed-product fermentation. Growth of the mutant was greatly inhibited on this medium. Fructose was quantitatively converted into sorbitol while glucose was oxidized into gluconic acid .This latter product was utilized as substrate for cell growth and ethanol production.Nomenclature X biomass concentration, g/l - S total sugar concentration, g/l - Glu glucose concentration, g/l - Fru fructose concentration, g/l - Sor sorbitol concentration, g/l - P ethanol concentration, g/l - t fermentation time, h - specific growth rate, h^-1 - q_s specific sugar uptake rate, g/g.h - q_G specific glucose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_F specific fructose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_P specific ethanol productivity, g/g.h - q_Sor specific sorbitol productivity, g/g.h - Y_X/S biomass yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_P/S ethanol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/S sorbitol yield on total sugar, g/g - y_Sor/f sorbitol yield on fructose, g/g - Y_P/G ethanol yield on glucose, g/g     

Combined alcoholic fermentation of D-xylose and D-glucose by four selected microbial strains: Process considerations in relation to ethanol tolerance

Summary As components of combined fermentation of both glucose and xylose to ethanol by separated or coculture processes, the effects of initial sugar concentrations on the fermentative performances ofPichia stipitis Y7124,Candida shehatae ATCC 22984,Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS1200 andZymomonas mobilis ATCC10988 were investigated. From the characteristics of sugar and produced ethanol tolerances the most suitable microorganisms for the achievement of glucose and xylose fermentations have been selected with respect to different fermentation schemes.Nomenclature Tf fermentation time (hours) - Ef ethanol concentration (g/l) - Y_P/S ethanol yield (g of ethanol produced/g of sugar used) - qp average specific productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/g of cells per hour) - max maximum specific growth rate (h^–1)     

Comparing the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase and xylose isomerase pathways in arabinose and xylose fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

Background

Ethanolic fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass is a sustainable option for the production of bioethanol. This process would greatly benefit from recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains also able to ferment, besides the hexose sugar fraction, the pentose sugars, arabinose and xylose. Different pathways can be introduced in S. cerevisiae to provide arabinose and xylose utilisation. In this study, the bacterial arabinose isomerase pathway was combined with two different xylose utilisation pathways: the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase and xylose isomerase pathways, respectively, in genetically identical strains. The strains were compared with respect to aerobic growth in arabinose and xylose batch culture and in anaerobic batch fermentation of a mixture of glucose, arabinose and xylose.

Results

The specific aerobic arabinose growth rate was identical, 0.03 h^-1, for the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase and xylose isomerase strain. The xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strain displayed higher aerobic growth rate on xylose, 0.14 h^-1, and higher specific xylose consumption rate in anaerobic batch fermentation, 0.09 g (g cells)^-1 h^-1 than the xylose isomerase strain, which only reached 0.03 h^-1 and 0.02 g (g cells)^-1h^-1, respectively. Whereas the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strain produced higher ethanol yield on total sugars, 0.23 g g^-1 compared with 0.18 g g^-1 for the xylose isomerase strain, the xylose isomerase strain achieved higher ethanol yield on consumed sugars, 0.41 g g^-1 compared with 0.32 g g^-1 for the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strain. Anaerobic fermentation of a mixture of glucose, arabinose and xylose resulted in higher final ethanol concentration, 14.7 g l^-1 for the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strain compared with 11.8 g l^-1 for the xylose isomerase strain, and in higher specific ethanol productivity, 0.024 g (g cells)^-1 h^-1 compared with 0.01 g (g cells)^-1 h^-1 for the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strain and the xylose isomerase strain, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase pathway and the bacterial arabinose isomerase pathway resulted in both higher pentose sugar uptake and higher overall ethanol production than the combination of the xylose isomerase pathway and the bacterial arabinose isomerase pathway. Moreover, the flux through the bacterial arabinose pathway did not increase when combined with the xylose isomerase pathway. This suggests that the low activity of the bacterial arabinose pathway cannot be ascribed to arabitol formation via the xylose reductase enzyme.     

The oxygen requirements of yeasts for the fermentation of d-xylose and d-glucose to ethanol

Summary The effect of oxygen availability on d-xylose and D-glucose metabolism by Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus was investigated. Oxygen was not required for fermentation of d-xylose or d-glucose, but stimulated the ethanol production rate from both sugars. Under oxygen-limited conditions, the highest ethanol yield coefficient (Y_e/s) of 0.47 was obtained on d-xylose with. P. stipitis, while under similar conditions C. shehatae fermented d-xylose most rapidly with a specific productivity (q_pmax) of 0.32 h^-1. Both of these yeasts fermented d-xylose better and produced less xylitol than. P. tannophilus. Synthesis of polyols such as xylitol, arabitol, glycerol and ribitol reduced the ethanol yield in some instances and was related to the yeast strain, carbon source and oxygen availability. In general, these yeasts fermented d-glucose more rapidly than d-xylose. By contrast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermented d-glucose at least three-fold faster under similar conditions.Nomenclature q_pmax maximum specific rate of ethanol production (g ethanol per g dry biomass per hour) - Y_e/s ethanol yield (g ethanol per g substrate utilized) - Y_p/s polyol yield (g polyol per g substrate utilized) - Y_x/s biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized) - _max maximum specific growth rate (per hour)     

Simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of xylose

Summary Ethanol was produced from xylose by converting the sugar to xylulose, using commercial xylose isomerases, and simultaneously converting the xylulose to ethanol by anaerobic fermentation using different yeast strains. The process was optimized with the yeast strain Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Y-164). The data show that the simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of 6% xylose can produce final ethanol concentrations of 2.1% w/v within 2 days at temperatures as high as 39°C.Nomenclature SFIX simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of xylose - V _p volumetric production (g ethanol·l^-1 per hour) - Q _p specific rate (g ethanol·g^-1 cells per hour) - Y _s yield from substrate consumed (g ethanol, g^-1 xylose) - ET ethanol concentration (% wt/vol) - XT xylitol concentration (% wt/vol) - Glu glucose - Xyl xylose - --m maximum - --f final     

Role of Glycerol Addition on Xylose-to-Xylitol Bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii

The effect of glycerol on xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii was evaluated by its addition (0.7 and 6.5 g/l) to semidefined media (xylose as a substrate). The glycerol concentrations were chosen based on the amounts produced during previous studies on xylitol production by C. guilliermondii. Medium without glycerol addition (control) and medium containing glycerol (53 g/l) in substitution to xylose were also evaluated. According to the results, the addition of 0.7 g/l glycerol to the fermentation medium favored not only the yield (Y _P/S = 0.78 g/g) but also the xylitol productivity (Q _P = 1.13 g/l/h). During the xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion, the formation of byproducts (glycerol and ethanol) was observed for all conditions employed. In relation to the cellular growth, glycerol as the only carbon source for C. guilliermondii was better than xylose or xylose and glycerol mixtures, resulting in a maximum cellular concentration (5.34 g/l).     

Performance,kinetics, and substrate utilization in a continuous yeast fermentation with cell recycle by ultrafiltration membranes

Summary A continuous single stage yeast fermentation with cell recycle by ultrafiltration membranes was operated at various recycle ratios. Cell concentration was increased 10.6 times, and ethanol concentration and fermentor productivity both 5.3 times with 97% recycle as compared to no recycle. Both specific growth rate and specific ethanol productivity followed the exponential ethanol inhibition form (specific productivity was constant up to 37.5 g/l of ethanol before decreasing), similar to that obtained without recycle, but with greater inhibition constants most likely due to toxins retained in the system at hight recycle ratios.By analyzing steady state data, the fractions of substrate used for cell growth, ethanol formation, and what which were wasted were accounted for. Yeast metabolism varied from mostly aerobic at low recycle ratios to mostly anaerobic at high recycle ratios at a constant dissolved oxygen concentration of 0.8 mg/kg. By increasing the cell recycle ratio, wasted substrate was reduced. When applied to ethanol fermentation, the familiar terminology of substrate used for Maintenance must be used with caution: it is not the same as the wasted substrate reported here.A general method for determining the best recycle ratio is presented; a balance among fermentor productivity, specific productivity, and wasted substrate needs to be made in recycle systems to approach an optimal design.Nomenclature B Bleed flow rate, l/h - C _T Concentration of toxins, arbitrary units - D Dilution rate, h^-1 - F Filtrate or permeate flow rate, removed from system, l/h - F _o Total feed flow rate to system, l/h - K _s Monod form constant, g/l - P Product (ethanol) concentration, g/l - P _o Ethanol concentration in feed, g/l - PP} Adjusted product concentration, g/l - PD Fermentor productivity, g/l-h - R Recycle ratio, F/F _o - S Substrate concentration in fermentor, g/l - S _o Substrate concentration in feed, g/l - V Working volume of fermentor, l - V _MB Viability based on methylene blue test - X Cell concentration, g dry cell/l - X _o Cell concentration in feed, g/l - Y _ATP Cellular yield from ATP, g cells/mol ATP - Y _ATPS Yield of ATP from substrate, mole ATP/mole glucose - Y _G True growth yield or maximum yield of cells from substrate, g cell/g glucose - Y _P Maximum theoretical yield of ethanol from glucose, 0.511 g ethanol/g glucose - Y _P/S Experimental yield of product from substrate, g ethanol/g glucose - Y _x/s Experimental yield of cells from substrate, g cell/g glucose - S _NP/X Non-product associated substrate utilization, g glucose/g cell - k ₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ Constants - k ₁ ^APP , k ₂ ^APP Apparent k ₁, k₃ - k ₁ ^TRUE True k ₁ - m Maintenance coefficient, g glucose/g cell-h - m ^* Coefficient of substrate not used for growth nor for ethanol formation, g glucose/g cell-h - Specific growth rate, g cells/g cells-h, reported as h^-1 - _m Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - v Specific productivity, g ethanol/g cell-h, reported as h^-1 - v _m Maximum specific productivity, h^-1     

Effect of substrate concentration on ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis on cellulose hydrolysate

Summary A cellulose hydrolysate from Aspen wood, containing mainly glucose, was fermented into ethanol by a thermotolerant strain MSN77 of Zymomonas mobilis. The effect of the hydrolysate concentration on fermentation parameters was investigated. Growth parameters (specific growth rate and biomass yield) were inhibited at high hydrolysate concentrations. Catabolic parameters (specific glucose uptake rate, specific ethanol productivity and ethanol yield) were not affected. These effects could be explained by the increase in medium osmolality. The results are similar to those described for molasses based media. Strain MSN77 could efficiently ferment glucose from Aspen wood up to a concentration of 60 g/l. At higher concentration, growth was inhibited.Nomenclature S glucose concentration (g/l) - X biomass concentration (g/l) - P ethanol concentration (g/l) - C conversion of glucose (%) - t fermentation time (h) - q_S specific glucose uptake rate (g/g.h) - q_p specific ethanol productivity (g/g.h) - YINX/S biomass yield (g/g) - Y_p/S ethanol yield (g/g) - specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Ethanol fermentation by flocculating yeast: Performance and stability dependence on a critical fermentation rate

Summary A system coupling fermentor and decantor permitted strong accumulation of yeast flocs that were homogeneously suspended in the reactional volume. At 100–190 g/l glucose feed practically total substrate conversion was attained. At 130 g/l glucose feed the highest productivity (18.4 g.l.h) and the highest ethanol yield (90.6%) were reached with biomass levels of 80–90 g/l. We observed that the stability of this system is limited when a critical fermentation rate (D.S_o) close to 39–40 g/l.h (with corresponding ethanol productivities of 19–20 g/l.h) is reached. Higher fermentation rates provoked de-flocculation and lost of biomass.Symbols D dilution rate (h^–1) - E ethanol (g/l) - S_r residual substrate (g/l) - S_o substrate in the feed (g/l) - X biomass (g/l) - ethanol yield (%) - DS_o fermentation rate (g/l.h) (for S_r0) - P_E ethanol productivity (g/l.h)     

Fermentation of hexoses and pentoses from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates into ethanol by Spathaspora hagerdaliae

The present study evaluated 13 strains of yeast for ethanol and xylitol production from xylose. Among them, Spathaspora hagerdaliae UFMG-CM-Y303 produced ethanol yields (Y_P/S) of 0.25 g g^− 1 and 0.39 g g^− 1 under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions, respectively, from a mixture of glucose and xylose in flasks. A pH of 5.0 and an inoculum of 3.0 × 10⁸ cells mL^− 1r resulted in the highest ethanol yields. These conditions were tested in a bioreactor for fermenting a medium containing an enzymatic hydrolysate of sugarcane bagasse with 15.5 g L^− 1 of glucose and 3 g L^− 1 of xylose, and achieved a Y_P/S of 0.47 g g^− 1, in relation to total available sugar. These results suggest that S. hagerdaliae UFMG-CM-Y303 has potential for use in second-generation ethanol studies.

     

Batch fermentation kinetics of ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis on cellulose hydrolysate

Summary Growth and ethanol production by three strains (MSN77, thermotolerant, SBE15, osmotolerant and wild type ZM4) of the bacterium Zymomonas mobilis were tested in a rich medium containing the hexose fraction from a cellulose hydrolysate (Aspen wood). The variations of yield and kinetic parameters with fermentation time revealed an inhibition of growth by the ethanol produced. This inhibition may result from the increase in medium osmolality due to ethanol formation from glucose.Nomenclature S glucose concentration (g/L) - C conversion of glucose (%) - t fermentation time (h) - q_S specific glucose uptake rate (g/g.h) - q_p specific ethanol productivity (g/g.h) - Q_p volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L.h) - Q_X volumetric biomass productivity (g/L.h) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g/g) - Y_p/S ethanol yield (g/g) - specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Performance assessment of two patent strains ofZymomonas mobilis in batch and continuous fermentations

Summary The performance ofZymomonas mobilis strains ATCC 31821 and ATCC 31823 was assessed in batch and continuous culture. In batch culture using a medium containing 250 g/l glucose, identical maximum specific growth rates of 0.16/h were found, though final biomass concentration and growth yield were significantly lower for ATCC 31 823 than for ATCC 31 821. Final ethanol concentrations in this medium were about 110 g/l vor both organisms. In continuous culture at increasing dilution rates using a medium containing 100 g/l glucose, no significant differences were seen between the two strains with respect to the fermentation parameters studied. For ATCC 31 821, maximum rates of glucose uptake (Q_s) and ethanol produktion (Q_p) of 8.7 g glu/g/h and 4.4 g eth/g/h, respectively, were found. Both strains showed a similar performance at a fixed dilution rate of 0.1/h, where maximum ethanol concentrations of about 68 g/l were reached at a feed glucose concentration of about 139 g/l. At this dilution rate the maximum values of Q_s and Q_p were about 5.8 g glu/g/h and 2.8 g eth/g/h, respectively. Test tube experiments showed that growth, measured as optical density, decreased with increasing concentrations of exogenous ethanol with complete inhibition of growth at ethanol concentrations >8% (v/v). As evidenced by the results presented here, we have been unable to practice the invention as described in U.S. Patent 4,403,034 (Rogers and Tribe 1983).Nomenclature D Dilution rate, 1/h - _max maximum specific growth rate, 1/h - S_R Initial substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S Residual substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S₀ Effluent substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - X Blomass concentration; g cells/l - OD₆₂₀ Optical density at 620 nm, dimensionless - [P] Product concentration, g ethanol/1 - Y_x/s Growth yield, g cells/g glucose used - Y_p/s Product yield, g ethanol/g glucose used - %, Yield Percentage yield, Y_p/sx100/Y _p ^s/max =Y_p/sx100/0.51 - Q_s Specific rate of glucose uptake, g glucose/g cells/h - Q_p Specific rate of ethanol formation, g ethanol/g cells/h - m_e Maintenance energy coefficient, g glucose/g cells/h - VP Volumetric productivity, g ethanol/l/h - t Fermentation time, h